<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Obamateurism of the Day</title>
	<atom:link href="http://hotair.com/archives/2009/03/22/obamateurism-of-the-day/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/03/22/obamateurism-of-the-day/</link>
	<description>The world’s first, full-service conservative Internet broadcast network</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 30 May 2012 17:05:41 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Amateur anal.</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/03/22/obamateurism-of-the-day/comment-page-4/#comment-2168577</link>
		<dc:creator>Amateur anal.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 03 May 2009 14:23:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=47636#comment-2168577</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Amateur creampie....&lt;/strong&gt;

Amateur sex....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Amateur creampie&#8230;.</strong></p>
<p>Amateur sex&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Free bondage.</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/03/22/obamateurism-of-the-day/comment-page-4/#comment-2165493</link>
		<dc:creator>Free bondage.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 02 May 2009 01:14:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=47636#comment-2165493</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Bondage....&lt;/strong&gt;

Free bondage galleries. Japanese bondage....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Bondage&#8230;.</strong></p>
<p>Free bondage galleries. Japanese bondage&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Free rape video.</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/03/22/obamateurism-of-the-day/comment-page-4/#comment-2162890</link>
		<dc:creator>Free rape video.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 May 2009 13:36:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=47636#comment-2162890</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Rape videos....&lt;/strong&gt;

Rape stories....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Rape videos&#8230;.</strong></p>
<p>Rape stories&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Some Housekeeping &#124; Politics</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/03/22/obamateurism-of-the-day/comment-page-4/#comment-2023554</link>
		<dc:creator>Some Housekeeping &#124; Politics</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Mar 2009 08:58:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=47636#comment-2023554</guid>
		<description>[...] some &#8220;gallows humor&#8221;. Har har. That makes me wager so such better! Don&#8217;t you wager [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] some &#8220;gallows humor&#8221;. Har har. That makes me wager so such better! Don&#8217;t you wager [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Just Words, without his teleprompter &#171; Pecanpii&#8217;s Weblog</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/03/22/obamateurism-of-the-day/comment-page-4/#comment-2017663</link>
		<dc:creator>Just Words, without his teleprompter &#171; Pecanpii&#8217;s Weblog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Mar 2009 05:55:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=47636#comment-2017663</guid>
		<description>[...] For more obamateurisms go here [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] For more obamateurisms go here [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Teleprompt Me, Baby &#124; WTF?! Obama</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/03/22/obamateurism-of-the-day/comment-page-4/#comment-2016411</link>
		<dc:creator>Teleprompt Me, Baby &#124; WTF?! Obama</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Mar 2009 23:24:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=47636#comment-2016411</guid>
		<description>[...] make words happen without his binky. Ed Morrissey calls these &#8220;totally lost&#8221; moments Obamateurisms. With all the noise being made, and even the mainstream press unable to dodge it, I thought [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] make words happen without his binky. Ed Morrissey calls these &#8220;totally lost&#8221; moments Obamateurisms. With all the noise being made, and even the mainstream press unable to dodge it, I thought [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: RedState</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/03/22/obamateurism-of-the-day/comment-page-4/#comment-2015202</link>
		<dc:creator>RedState</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Mar 2009 18:21:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=47636#comment-2015202</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Teleprompt Me, Baby...&lt;/strong&gt;

CLICK TO VIEW FULL
Obama and his teleprompter are big news lately. As Vodka Pundit noted in his weekly summary, the right-o-sphere saw the meteoric rise of a new star, Barack Obama&#8217;s Teleprompter&#8217;s blog last week. Also last week, an hilario...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Teleprompt Me, Baby&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>CLICK TO VIEW FULL<br />
Obama and his teleprompter are big news lately. As Vodka Pundit noted in his weekly summary, the right-o-sphere saw the meteoric rise of a new star, Barack Obama&#8217;s Teleprompter&#8217;s blog last week. Also last week, an hilario&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Intimidator</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/03/22/obamateurism-of-the-day/comment-page-4/#comment-2015070</link>
		<dc:creator>Intimidator</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Mar 2009 17:40:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=47636#comment-2015070</guid>
		<description>The &lt;strong&gt;kid&lt;/strong&gt; needs to &lt;strong&gt;detox&lt;/strong&gt; from the &lt;strong&gt;blanky&lt;/strong&gt; errrr.... ummm..... &lt;strong&gt;teleprompter&lt;/strong&gt;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The <strong>kid</strong> needs to <strong>detox</strong> from the <strong>blanky</strong> errrr&#8230;. ummm&#8230;.. <strong>teleprompter</strong>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tags</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/03/22/obamateurism-of-the-day/comment-page-4/#comment-2014850</link>
		<dc:creator>Tags</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Mar 2009 16:51:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=47636#comment-2014850</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Teleprompt Me, Baby...&lt;/strong&gt;

CLICK TO VIEW FULL
Obama and his teleprompter are big news lately. As Vodka Pundit noted in his weekly summary, the right-o-sphere saw the meteoric rise of a new star, Barack Obama&#8217;s Teleprompter&#8217;s blog last week. Also last week, an hilario...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Teleprompt Me, Baby&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>CLICK TO VIEW FULL<br />
Obama and his teleprompter are big news lately. As Vodka Pundit noted in his weekly summary, the right-o-sphere saw the meteoric rise of a new star, Barack Obama&#8217;s Teleprompter&#8217;s blog last week. Also last week, an hilario&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Teleprompt Me, Baby - absentee&#8217;s blog - RedState</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/03/22/obamateurism-of-the-day/comment-page-4/#comment-2014725</link>
		<dc:creator>Teleprompt Me, Baby - absentee&#8217;s blog - RedState</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Mar 2009 16:08:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=47636#comment-2014725</guid>
		<description>[...] make words happen without his binky. Ed Morrissey calls these &#8220;totally lost&#8221; moments Obamateurisms. With all the noise being made, and even the mainstream press unable to dodge it, I thought [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] make words happen without his binky. Ed Morrissey calls these &#8220;totally lost&#8221; moments Obamateurisms. With all the noise being made, and even the mainstream press unable to dodge it, I thought [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Some Housekeeping &#124; The Anchoress</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/03/22/obamateurism-of-the-day/comment-page-4/#comment-2014623</link>
		<dc:creator>Some Housekeeping &#124; The Anchoress</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Mar 2009 15:18:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=47636#comment-2014623</guid>
		<description>[...] some &#8220;gallows humor&#8221;. Har har. That makes me feel so much better! Don&#8217;t you feel [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] some &#8220;gallows humor&#8221;. Har har. That makes me feel so much better! Don&#8217;t you feel [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve Z</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/03/22/obamateurism-of-the-day/comment-page-4/#comment-2014440</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve Z</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Mar 2009 14:07:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=47636#comment-2014440</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;To say that, uh … they say uh, in the face of challenges, uh, that we face, we should be trying to do less than more.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

This is a sentence fragment. Where is the verb in this sentence? &quot;To say that...we should be trying to do less than more&quot; is a thought or a concept, which Obama intends to criticize, but what does he say about it? 

&quot;In the face of the challenges that we face&quot;--now we have &quot;face&quot; as a noun and a verb--this is a two-faced remark!

Please forgive me for this English grammar analysis--my Mom was a high school English teacher, but probably couldn&#039;t diagram this sentence!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>To say that, uh … they say uh, in the face of challenges, uh, that we face, we should be trying to do less than more.</p></blockquote>
<p>This is a sentence fragment. Where is the verb in this sentence? &#8220;To say that&#8230;we should be trying to do less than more&#8221; is a thought or a concept, which Obama intends to criticize, but what does he say about it? </p>
<p>&#8220;In the face of the challenges that we face&#8221;&#8211;now we have &#8220;face&#8221; as a noun and a verb&#8211;this is a two-faced remark!</p>
<p>Please forgive me for this English grammar analysis&#8211;my Mom was a high school English teacher, but probably couldn&#8217;t diagram this sentence!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Obamateurism of the Day - Southern Maryland Community Forums</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/03/22/obamateurism-of-the-day/comment-page-4/#comment-2014128</link>
		<dc:creator>Obamateurism of the Day - Southern Maryland Community Forums</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Mar 2009 09:45:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=47636#comment-2014128</guid>
		<description>[...] I</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] I</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ladyhawke53</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/03/22/obamateurism-of-the-day/comment-page-4/#comment-2014122</link>
		<dc:creator>ladyhawke53</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Mar 2009 09:23:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=47636#comment-2014122</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;He &lt;strike&gt;was &lt;/strike&gt; &lt;strong&gt;is&lt;/strong&gt; an embarrassment and a failure.

Compare the two in town hall questions without a teleprompter and the &lt;strong&gt;former&lt;/strong&gt; President put&lt;strong&gt;s&lt;/strong&gt; him to shame.

Not even close.

getalife on March 22, 2009 at 9:35 PM&lt;/blockquote&gt;

FIFY</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>He <strike>was </strike> <strong>is</strong> an embarrassment and a failure.</p>
<p>Compare the two in town hall questions without a teleprompter and the <strong>former</strong> President put<strong>s</strong> him to shame.</p>
<p>Not even close.</p>
<p>getalife on March 22, 2009 at 9:35 PM</p></blockquote>
<p>FIFY</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: opusrex</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/03/22/obamateurism-of-the-day/comment-page-3/#comment-2014078</link>
		<dc:creator>opusrex</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Mar 2009 06:24:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=47636#comment-2014078</guid>
		<description>crr6 on March 22, 2009 at 9:36 PM

Never occured to you that it could have been TOTUS on the ear-wig?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>crr6 on March 22, 2009 at 9:36 PM</p>
<p>Never occured to you that it could have been TOTUS on the ear-wig?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: RealDemocrat</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/03/22/obamateurism-of-the-day/comment-page-3/#comment-2014060</link>
		<dc:creator>RealDemocrat</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Mar 2009 06:08:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=47636#comment-2014060</guid>
		<description>This Obama character is a real dufus huh?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This Obama character is a real dufus huh?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: RealDemocrat</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/03/22/obamateurism-of-the-day/comment-page-3/#comment-2014057</link>
		<dc:creator>RealDemocrat</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Mar 2009 06:05:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=47636#comment-2014057</guid>
		<description>Obama talks “down to” people. Seriously, look at him even when he’s being interviewed. He holds his head up and talks down without really looking at the person interviewing him. It’s part of his mannerisms and persona, he is an elitist, snob.

Susanboo on March 23, 2009 at 12:56 AM

Yeah, Michelle and the oldest girl have that same little arrogant sneer about them...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Obama talks “down to” people. Seriously, look at him even when he’s being interviewed. He holds his head up and talks down without really looking at the person interviewing him. It’s part of his mannerisms and persona, he is an elitist, snob.</p>
<p>Susanboo on March 23, 2009 at 12:56 AM</p>
<p>Yeah, Michelle and the oldest girl have that same little arrogant sneer about them&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: RealDemocrat</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/03/22/obamateurism-of-the-day/comment-page-3/#comment-2014053</link>
		<dc:creator>RealDemocrat</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Mar 2009 06:03:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=47636#comment-2014053</guid>
		<description>I grew up around a lot of viciously racist Johnson Democrats. In my adult life, most of the noticably racist people I’ve met have been liberals, believing we should treat someone differently solely because of their race. They’ve been equally prejudiced in their view of homosexuals and those not born to wealth or privilige.

Red State State of Mind on March 22, 2009 at 8:24 PM

You mean like the ones clinging to their guns and their bibles? TOTUS Rules!!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I grew up around a lot of viciously racist Johnson Democrats. In my adult life, most of the noticably racist people I’ve met have been liberals, believing we should treat someone differently solely because of their race. They’ve been equally prejudiced in their view of homosexuals and those not born to wealth or privilige.</p>
<p>Red State State of Mind on March 22, 2009 at 8:24 PM</p>
<p>You mean like the ones clinging to their guns and their bibles? TOTUS Rules!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: What If Bush Had Done That?! &#187; Blog Archive &#187; from the Department of Redundancy Department</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/03/22/obamateurism-of-the-day/comment-page-3/#comment-2014019</link>
		<dc:creator>What If Bush Had Done That?! &#187; Blog Archive &#187; from the Department of Redundancy Department</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Mar 2009 05:39:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=47636#comment-2014019</guid>
		<description>[...] From Ed Morrissey at Hot Air, where he is also keeping track of &#8220;Obamateurisms.&#8221; [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] From Ed Morrissey at Hot Air, where he is also keeping track of &#8220;Obamateurisms.&#8221; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Susanboo</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/03/22/obamateurism-of-the-day/comment-page-3/#comment-2013962</link>
		<dc:creator>Susanboo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Mar 2009 05:10:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=47636#comment-2013962</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;It’s a clever way to make it seem like he’s “connecting” with his audience without actually having to do so.

Daggett on March 23, 2009 at 1:03 AM&lt;/blockquote&gt;


You know, it&#039;s really a pain for him to have to talk to us at all, as we are all beneath him.  He wishes he could just get on with his socialist,  leaning- towards-marxism-agenda without having to consult with all the &quot;little people&quot;. We are just getting in the way.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>It’s a clever way to make it seem like he’s “connecting” with his audience without actually having to do so.</p>
<p>Daggett on March 23, 2009 at 1:03 AM</p></blockquote>
<p>You know, it&#8217;s really a pain for him to have to talk to us at all, as we are all beneath him.  He wishes he could just get on with his socialist,  leaning- towards-marxism-agenda without having to consult with all the &#8220;little people&#8221;. We are just getting in the way.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Susanboo</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/03/22/obamateurism-of-the-day/comment-page-3/#comment-2013953</link>
		<dc:creator>Susanboo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Mar 2009 05:06:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=47636#comment-2013953</guid>
		<description>&lt;em&gt;conservative pilgrim on March 23, 2009 at 12:48 AM:&lt;/em&gt;

My teenage daughter and I have some great fun while we are in the checkout line! We turn all the magazines with Obama&#039;s face on it around so you can&#039;t see them.  It&#039;s really fun at the bookstore where you can go turn all the Obama books around, since there are so many of them and they are always so prominently displayed in the front. We have a great time with this bit of mischievous play, plus we don&#039;t have to look at his &quot;ever present&quot; face looking down on us and it annoys the Libs who put them there in the first place!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em>conservative pilgrim on March 23, 2009 at 12:48 AM:</em></p>
<p>My teenage daughter and I have some great fun while we are in the checkout line! We turn all the magazines with Obama&#8217;s face on it around so you can&#8217;t see them.  It&#8217;s really fun at the bookstore where you can go turn all the Obama books around, since there are so many of them and they are always so prominently displayed in the front. We have a great time with this bit of mischievous play, plus we don&#8217;t have to look at his &#8220;ever present&#8221; face looking down on us and it annoys the Libs who put them there in the first place!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Daggett</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/03/22/obamateurism-of-the-day/comment-page-3/#comment-2013945</link>
		<dc:creator>Daggett</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Mar 2009 05:03:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=47636#comment-2013945</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;Obama talks “down to” people. Seriously, look at him even when he’s being interviewed. He holds his head up and talks down without really looking at the person interviewing him. It’s part of his mannerisms and persona, he is an elitist, snob.

Susanboo on March 23, 2009 at 12:56 AM&lt;/blockquote&gt;

I agree.  

I was just making the point that he doesn&#039;t really talk TO or AT anyone when he gives a speech.  He simply talks in their general direction as a side-effect of having to look alternately at two teleprompters.  It&#039;s a clever way to make it seem like he&#039;s &quot;connecting&quot; with his audience without actually having to do so.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Obama talks “down to” people. Seriously, look at him even when he’s being interviewed. He holds his head up and talks down without really looking at the person interviewing him. It’s part of his mannerisms and persona, he is an elitist, snob.</p>
<p>Susanboo on March 23, 2009 at 12:56 AM</p></blockquote>
<p>I agree.  </p>
<p>I was just making the point that he doesn&#8217;t really talk TO or AT anyone when he gives a speech.  He simply talks in their general direction as a side-effect of having to look alternately at two teleprompters.  It&#8217;s a clever way to make it seem like he&#8217;s &#8220;connecting&#8221; with his audience without actually having to do so.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Susanboo</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/03/22/obamateurism-of-the-day/comment-page-3/#comment-2013920</link>
		<dc:creator>Susanboo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Mar 2009 04:56:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=47636#comment-2013920</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;In a way, you’re right. Bush talked to the people, Obama talked at them.

MadisonConservative on March 22, 2009 at 9:52 PM

Wrong. Obama doesn’t talk TO or AT anyone.

He simply LOOKS like he’s talking TO or AT people, on the left and on the right.

That’s why he has TWO teleprompters.

Daggett on March 23, 2009 at 12:31 AM&lt;/blockquote&gt;


&lt;strong&gt;Obama talks &quot;down to&quot; people&lt;/strong&gt;. Seriously, look at him even when he&#039;s being interviewed. He holds his head up and talks down without really looking at the person interviewing him. It&#039;s part of his mannerisms and persona, he is an elitist, snob.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>In a way, you’re right. Bush talked to the people, Obama talked at them.</p>
<p>MadisonConservative on March 22, 2009 at 9:52 PM</p>
<p>Wrong. Obama doesn’t talk TO or AT anyone.</p>
<p>He simply LOOKS like he’s talking TO or AT people, on the left and on the right.</p>
<p>That’s why he has TWO teleprompters.</p>
<p>Daggett on March 23, 2009 at 12:31 AM</p></blockquote>
<p><strong>Obama talks &#8220;down to&#8221; people</strong>. Seriously, look at him even when he&#8217;s being interviewed. He holds his head up and talks down without really looking at the person interviewing him. It&#8217;s part of his mannerisms and persona, he is an elitist, snob.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Susanboo</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/03/22/obamateurism-of-the-day/comment-page-3/#comment-2013901</link>
		<dc:creator>Susanboo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Mar 2009 04:52:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=47636#comment-2013901</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;Most presidents have pretty good approval ratings once they enter office and Obama is no exception (although if he were performing as horribly everyone here thinks one would assume they would be lower…) but I guarantee you that he won’t be the most unpopular president since polling began like Bush. We’ll just have to wait and see who’s right.

crr6 on March 23, 2009 at 12:10 AM
&lt;/blockquote&gt;

If the press started treating Obama like they did Bush, Barry would be in &lt;strong&gt;negative numbers, (as in -10 etc...)&lt;/strong&gt;, not just in the 20&#039;s and 30&#039;s. He is such a baby faced wimp, he would never make it through four years of treatment like Bush got. Say what you will about Pres. Bush, but the guy has character, and certainly has guts, unlike Obama, who whines about everything, even when someone makes fun of his stupid, giant ears!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Most presidents have pretty good approval ratings once they enter office and Obama is no exception (although if he were performing as horribly everyone here thinks one would assume they would be lower…) but I guarantee you that he won’t be the most unpopular president since polling began like Bush. We’ll just have to wait and see who’s right.</p>
<p>crr6 on March 23, 2009 at 12:10 AM
</p></blockquote>
<p>If the press started treating Obama like they did Bush, Barry would be in <strong>negative numbers, (as in -10 etc&#8230;)</strong>, not just in the 20&#8242;s and 30&#8242;s. He is such a baby faced wimp, he would never make it through four years of treatment like Bush got. Say what you will about Pres. Bush, but the guy has character, and certainly has guts, unlike Obama, who whines about everything, even when someone makes fun of his stupid, giant ears!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: conservative pilgrim</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/03/22/obamateurism-of-the-day/comment-page-3/#comment-2013888</link>
		<dc:creator>conservative pilgrim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Mar 2009 04:49:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=47636#comment-2013888</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;I hope we’re being punked. Otherwise I might have to revisit my view of post-natal abortion.

Daggett on March 23, 2009 at 12:45 AM&lt;/blockquote&gt;

If we aren&#039;t being punked, this is much worse than I thought. Goodness.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>I hope we’re being punked. Otherwise I might have to revisit my view of post-natal abortion.</p>
<p>Daggett on March 23, 2009 at 12:45 AM</p></blockquote>
<p>If we aren&#8217;t being punked, this is much worse than I thought. Goodness.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
