Debbie; I never criticize a Mom for what she names her child. She carried that baby not you. Besides I like the Palin names. Bristol, Willow, and Piper are lovely names. You never heard of Piper Laurie? What is wrong with Trak and Trigg? At least there won’t be 4 or 5 kids named that in their classes at school.

Any name (or word) sounds strange the first time you hear it. If it has connotations such as Rotunda Chandelier (which someone actually named their child after Kennedy’s assassination) then obviously the child is going to be embarrassed later on.

But to make fun of a name simply because you don’t like the mother. That is overreaching.

http://www.sarah-palin-2012.blogspot.com

History Chaser on March 21, 2009 at 11:23 AM

First Obots, NOW PALINBOTS! I do not like these names Palin gave her children. Just give me Mary and Joseph for my children.

I heard that she rejected some of the funds and offered to steer them to you for make-up.

And that name “Debbie” … that is a weirdo name … your family must be weird too

joey24007 on March 20, 2009 at 12:01 PM

AND YOUR POINT IS….?

And another thing Joey, YOU NEED SOME MEDICINE AND LEAVE DEB ALONE! OR DO YOU WANT ME TO TALK SMACK ABOUT YOUR FAMILY?

You know on this site I have been seeing a lot of neo-con talk (with Debbie being the only exception I know of). It’s thoughts like those from the neo-cons or FAUXCONS as I call them that make me wonder what I am in terms of conservatism. And in case any of you need to vet me, I am registered NO AFFILIATION in my town, which in essence makes me independent. Even voted Libertarian in the race that knocked Chris Shays out and gave us ultra-left radical Jim Himes.

Any name (or word) sounds strange the first time you hear it. If it has connotations such as Rotunda Chandelier (which someone actually named their child after Kennedy’s assassination) then obviously the child is going to be embarrassed later on.

But to make fun of a name simply because you don’t like the mother. That is overreaching.

http://www.sarah-palin-2012.blogspot.com

Palin said she would speak with the Legislature on which projects were viable and which were not. That way, nobody can accuse her of using her bully pulpit to turn down “necessary” in an act of political grandstanding.

chunderroad on March 20, 2009 at 11:06 PM

It’s a shrewd political move, maybe. Now we’re finding out that as late as Wednesday Palin let legislators and school officials believe she would be accepting the educational and other funds. She changed her position only after pressure from her SarahPac advisers. It allows her to claim she refused stimulus funds while passing the buck to the legislature. Some pretty nifty political positioning I’ll grant you but not exactly what you would call asserting leadership nor does it tell us anything about her real views, assuming she has any, on the stimulus act.

Also reported today, her Office of Budget and Management sent out an email to all state agencies to go ahead with requests for all stimulus funds. She wouldn’t be playing politics would she?

lowandslow on March 20, 2009 at 8:24 PM

Palin said she would speak with the Legislature on which projects were viable and which were not. That way, nobody can accuse her of using her bully pulpit to turn down “necessary” in an act of political grandstanding.

Also reported today, her Office of Budget and Management sent out an email to all state agencies to go ahead with requests for all stimulus funds. She wouldn’t be playing politics would she?

lowandslow on March 20, 2009 at 8:24 PM

Oh! Then she DOES love the children! LOL Why wouldn’t she play politics with it? The whole stimulus is a Democrat party “gotcha”.

Actually, AllahP got the numbers completely wrong. And she’s 69% prostitute. The 31% is what she rejected. She’s accepting about $642 million and rejecting only about $288 million.

Debbie Schlussel on March 20, 2009 at 11:51 AM

Ah well, maybe the earlier figures will become gospel as much as “she’s a book-burning religious kook” did.

“Lt. Gov. Sean Parnell showed up to deliver Palin’s message – that she’s not necessarily “rejecting” the money, but wants a public debate on how it’s spent and whether it would cost the state in the long run.”

Also reported today, her Office of Budget and Management sent out an email to all state agencies to go ahead with requests for all stimulus funds. She wouldn’t be playing politics would she?

That would be too easy to work into a joke about Palin.

sethstorm on March 20, 2009 at 7:27 PM

You remind me of a turkey I once observed that ran itself into a corner and forgot how it got there. It just kept running forward into that dead end. No wonder you’re an Obama supporter.

Liberal media and Deb S.: “Yeah, but she broke the law because she doesn’t have her bus license and then she left Palin sweat on the wheel! String her up!”

Allahpundit: “It was actually 34, since you really can’t count Palin.”

Deb S.: “Oh, and one of the ‘people’ they counted was actually inside a woman still, so it doesn’t count. 33. Allah loves me :) “

chunderroad on March 20, 2009 at 6:47 PM

That would be too easy to work into a joke about Palin.

sethstorm on March 20, 2009 at 4:29 PM

Talk about class. Chundernoclass or whatever your name is.

Monkei on March 20, 2009 at 5:28 PM

Somebody call this Springsteen fan a Waaaaahmbulance!

You are right chunderwhatever, my lack of class obviously showed in my ignorance, she is 69 percent prostitute not 31.

Monkei on March 20, 2009 at 5:27 PM

Better than 100% in any case.

It is idiotic qualifying how much of an alleged prostitute Palin in comparison to Obama. She is a pearl cast before that swine, no matter how much lipstick you put on him.

chunderroad on March 20, 2009 at 1:23 PM

Talk about class. Chundernoclass or whatever your name is.

Good, she has shown she is only 31 percent prostitute instead of 100 percent prostitute.

Monkei on March 20, 2009 at 9:35 AM

While you’re 100% stupid and 0% class. Nice!

chunderroad on March 20, 2009 at 10:00 AM

You are right chunderwhatever, my lack of class obviously showed in my ignorance, she is 69 percent prostitute not 31.

If she is the nominee in 2012, and she won’t be, Barack will be Prez for 8 years, as a symptom of your blindness.

Debbie Schlussel on March 20, 2009 at 12:08 PM

Why so perturbed, then?

I did read it, and even the Sarahmessiah’s lying press release admits she is ACCEPTING–not rejecting as allahp is claiming–$515 million. She’s no conservative. She’s a fraud. And despite the fact that you blind followers refuse to wake up, she will never be President. If she is the nominee in 2012, and she won’t be, Barack will be Prez for 8 years, as a symptom of your blindness.

Debbie Schlussel on March 20, 2009 at 12:08 PM

It would’ve been “lying” even if it turned out to have been $514 million instead of $515.

If Barack Obama had named his kids 2 Live Crew and Treadmill, I’m sure no conservative would ever say a word.

I couldn’t care less what his kids’ names are. Your disgust with the Palin kids’ names says more about you than either the kids or their parents.

Brian1972 on March 20, 2009 at 4:43 PM

They can send it back and lobby for a bill that would be able to do that at the proper level.

As for the other person:
Face it, she’s damaged goods. But she can feel free to send that money to Michigan and Ohio.

sethstorm on March 20, 2009 at 4:29 PM

Face it, you are now damaged goods, genius. What makes you think any Governor can send Federal funds to another State?
They can’t, dumbass.
What makes you think that the states of Michigan and Ohio deserve more than they have gotten already?
Why should a state that is trying to be responsible with it’s fiscal future be on the hook for another state that keeps electing Governors that enact bad policies, chasing off businesses and residents?
Have you ever heard of the Tenth Amendment to the Constitution?
I don’t expect any answers.

Thankfully, the corpulent pill popper isn’t young, and the other one is damaged goods.

sethstorm on March 20, 2009 at 2:11 AM

Corrected.

The only help he got was to evade convictions because that would be a Bad Thing. We couldn’t have someone convicted in the same manner as their fans. It’d look bad for the advertisers to be sponsoring a convicted felon.

As for the other person:
Face it, she’s damaged goods. But she can feel free to send that money to Michigan and Ohio.