Hot Air Mobile
Home The Vault Gear About
Hot Air -- get your fill


Hey, guess who else has an executive retention bonus plan?

posted at 11:48 am on March 18, 2009 by Ed Morrissey
Share on Facebook | printer-friendly

While everyone assails AIG for using less than 0.1% of the taxpayer-bailout money it received to meet contractual obligations in compensation through retention bonuses, another recipient of government largesse has its own bonus program in operation.  According to their annual report, Freddie Mac has a generous retention bonus plan built into its operation for the next year.  Eligibility includes all of the senior and executive VPs.  It comes in four payouts, and only the last has any connection to company performance.

Exhibit 10-4 on page 414-5 lays out the program:

Objective To retain as many people as possible for 18 months (through March, 2010) in order to:

  • Maintain maximum operational stability
  • Allow time to evaluate the fundamental business model
  • Fulfill Freddie Mac’s goal of re-establishing stability and liquidity to the mortgage market

Retention Period Retention Period runs from September 2008 through March 2010.

General Eligibility All Senior Vice Presidents and Executive Vice Presidents who are employees of Freddie Mac on or after September 1, 2008 are eligible to participate in the program.

Freddie Mac pays the bonus on a quarterly basis for simply sticking around, at least until the final quarter:

Payout Timing The aggregate retention award for each individual will be paid in the regular payroll cycle occurring immediately after the following dates …

  • 1     20%     December 15, 2008
  • 2     20%     August 1, 2009
  • 3     25%     December 15, 2009
  • 4     35%     March 15, 2010

Payment Numbers 1, 2, and 3 will be based solely in the individual’s continued employment with Freddie Mac the through the indicated payment dates.

Performance Requirements Payment Number 4 will be conditioned upon achievement of specific performance objective(s) that will be determined during the upcoming businessplanning process.

That sounds a lot like the AIG retention bonus plan, although Freddie Mac does have a disclaimer stating that they can modify or end the program at their discretion.  Since Freddie Mac and her sister Fannie Mae got over $200 billion in a pre-TARP bailout, more than the private AIG got (at least in the aggregate), one might ask why Freddie Mac built in retention bonuses in this November filing — two months after the taxpayer bailout.

If AIG’s retention bonuses are a problem, why aren’t Freddie Mac’s?

Update: The Wall Street Journal is also on the case:

Fannie Mae is due to pay retention bonuses of as much $470,000 to $611,000 this year to some executives despite enormous losses at the government-backed mortgage company. Fannie’s main rival, Freddie Mac, also plans to pay such bonuses but hasn’t yet provided details.

Fannie’s bonuses are smaller than ones paid by American International Group Inc. that have caused a political firestorm for that company. Many AIG executives got retention payments of more than $1 million recently.

But the Fannie bonuses are still considerable and come at a time when Fannie and Freddie are receiving increasing amounts of funding from the Treasury. For 2008, Fannie and Freddie reported combined losses of about $108 billion, largely stemming from a surge in home-mortgage defaults. The U.S. Treasury has agreed to provide as much as $200 billion of capital apiece to Fannie and Freddie in exchange for senior preferred stock. The two companies already have said they will need a combined $60 billion of that money to cover their losses so far.

Looks like James Hagerty was working on this independently, and did a good job of digging up the actual size of the bonuses.


Blowback

Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.

Trackbacks/Pings

Trackback URL

Comments

Comment pages: 1 2

Because:

“These two entities — Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac — are not facing any kind of financial crisis,” said Representative Barney Frank of Massachusetts, the ranking Democrat on the Financial Services Committee. ”The more people exaggerate these problems, the more pressure there is on these companies, the less we will see in terms of affordable housing.”

lorien1973 on March 18, 2009 at 11:50 AM

Comedy gold!!

WashJeff on March 18, 2009 at 11:52 AM

Hey, Carter -is- in the White House!

I thought it was just a metaphor.

lorien1973 on March 18, 2009 at 11:53 AM

Great find.

Government ownership – the antithesis of King Midas’ touch.

beatcanvas on March 18, 2009 at 11:53 AM

Nice find Ed! If this gets around, those bonuses are gone.

FuriousAmerican on March 18, 2009 at 11:54 AM

Midas? More like Mr. Lube.

MrX on March 18, 2009 at 11:54 AM

Don’t be silly, Ed. It’s only a problem when Obama can use it to distract the public from his administration.

amkun on March 18, 2009 at 11:54 AM

lorien1973 on March 18, 2009 at 11:53 AM

He’s been running the join since January 20th.

amerpundit on March 18, 2009 at 11:56 AM

In fact, I’d bet these bonuses were planned as phase 134 of Operation: Outrage America.

amkun on March 18, 2009 at 11:56 AM

Great job, Ed.

Weight of Glory on March 18, 2009 at 11:57 AM

This adminstration is unraveling… it’s amazing.

stenwin77 on March 18, 2009 at 11:58 AM

This adminstration is unraveling… it’s amazing.

stenwin77 on March 18, 2009 at 11:58 AM

While our enemies watch. And they aren’t watching CNN.

AubieJon on March 18, 2009 at 12:00 PM

Can someone find out the amounts paid by Fannie and Freddie? Added bonus: there is no question that retention bonuses were agreed to while they were government run entities.

Vashta.Nerada on March 18, 2009 at 12:01 PM

I sure hope this administration we are watching is part of a new Zucker brothers (Airplane, Naked Gun, etc.) reality show…that will get cancelled by summer.

WashJeff on March 18, 2009 at 12:02 PM

This is too funny! You cannot make this stuff up!

There is no intellectual honesty in Liberalism and government, so they won’t see a single problem with this. Besides, Freddie and Fannie help the Dems’ constituents, AIG doesn’t.

That is the difference.

http://franklinslocke.blogspot.com/

franklinslocke on March 18, 2009 at 12:03 PM

Because:

“These two entities — Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac — are not facing any kind of financial crisis,” said Representative Barney Frank of Massachusetts, the ranking Democrat on the Financial Services Committee. ”The more people exaggerate these problems, the more pressure there is on these companies, the less we will see in terms of affordable housing.”

lorien1973 on March 18, 2009 at 11:50 AM

I love Frank’s logic – they aren’t facing financial crisis, but here’s 200 billion just in case.

gwelf on March 18, 2009 at 12:03 PM

Good job Ed…

The top polling firms should take a poll asking private citizens if they trust the federal government to make decisions that are in the best interest of the citizens. This Congress has held all time low approval ratings; let’s expand on that and find out exactly where the people stand.

Same question should be asked of the State; State by State basis.

Keemo on March 18, 2009 at 12:04 PM

I swear, every time I see Barney Frank I just want to reach into my computer screen and biatch slap that lying sanctimonious azz-hat!

What a damn POS troll, he and Dodd are acutely aware of whom was most responsible for the banking/housing meltdown yet they continually deflect their blame onto the repubs and talk/act like they’re going to swoop in and save the day by reforming FM/FM!

Seriously, my blood boils whenever I see Frank or Dodd and their sanctimonious BS!!

I think I’ll make me a Frank and Dodd voo-doo doll and roast them over the BBQ tonight, it won’t have any effect on them but it will sure make me feel better!

Liberty or Death on March 18, 2009 at 12:04 PM

Wait a minute folks.. The One and Barney Frank have a point.. Too bad it’s on the top of their heads!!!

Dire Straits on March 18, 2009 at 12:05 PM

Freddie Mac and her sister Fannie Mae

Misplaced gender pronoun?…or deliberate slam?
Or…could Freddie be a female name? Hmmm.

whitetop on March 18, 2009 at 12:05 PM

I think I’ll make me a Frank and Dodd voo-doo doll and roast them over the BBQ tonight, it won’t have any effect on them but it will sure make me feel better!

Liberty or Death on March 18, 2009 at 12:04 PM

Boy does that sound good. Count me in on that one!

Keemo on March 18, 2009 at 12:06 PM

whitetop on March 18, 2009 at 12:05 PM

Businesses, like ships, are usually referred to as feminine.

lorien1973 on March 18, 2009 at 12:08 PM

One the Democrats have fully demonized the word “bonus” what word will we use to describe what used to be called bonuses?

myrenovations on March 18, 2009 at 12:08 PM

whitetop on March 18, 2009 at 12:05 PM

Freddie under went a little gender change recently. She now goes by the name Frederica, but most still know “her” as Freddie.

amerpundit on March 18, 2009 at 12:09 PM

Oh please. It makes it look like \Barney is a better negotiator for his intimate friends than is Dodd. In a closer look, Freddie mac’s are of a pure retention bonus nature and AIG’s are part of a performance bonus structure.

seven on March 18, 2009 at 12:09 PM

Clawback?

Iblis on March 18, 2009 at 12:09 PM

Because:

The money goes to democrat insiders, aka. friends of Da Bama
.

DannoJyd on March 18, 2009 at 12:09 PM

Uh Oh…lmao.

canditaylor68 on March 18, 2009 at 12:11 PM

lorien1973 on March 18, 2009 at 12:08 PM

Yeah, but, it if you’re going to humanize the two by using “sister” (instead of “sister company”), along with the fact that the two are human names, “his” seems appropriate..?

amkun on March 18, 2009 at 12:11 PM

OOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO mmmmmmmmmmmyyyyyyyyyyyy gawd,
FM/FM,have a bonus soap opera as well!!

Wheres the F$##$$^^*&**%%#@$%&*&())(%#kin OUTRAGE!

canopfor on March 18, 2009 at 12:11 PM

This is what happens when the guy in the mail room writes the company mission statement.

Limerick on March 18, 2009 at 12:12 PM

Why isn’t the Banking Queen,having a Drama Queen
meltdown!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

canopfor on March 18, 2009 at 12:13 PM

I swear, every time I see Barney Frank I just want to reach into my computer screen and…

Admittedly, I’m not a master of nuance, but I’m sensing some antipathy toward Frank here.

whitetop on March 18, 2009 at 12:13 PM

Nice one, Ed! :]

bluelightbrigade on March 18, 2009 at 12:13 PM

Freddie under went a little gender change recently. She now goes by the name Frederica, but most still know “her” as Freddie.

amerpundit on March 18, 2009 at 12:09 PM

Barney Frank would say, “Thinking Fweddie is awtomaticawlly a mawe’s name is so hetewonowmative!!

Gway-basher.”

Maybe

amkun on March 18, 2009 at 12:14 PM

I sure hope this administration we are watching is part of a new Zucker brothers (Airplane, Naked Gun, etc.) reality show…that will get cancelled by summer.

WashJeff on March 18, 2009 at 12:02 PM

I doubt it. In those stories the bumblers were the heros, and they succeeded in the end.

Patrick S on March 18, 2009 at 12:16 PM

One the Democrats have fully demonized the word “bonus” what word will we use to describe what used to be called bonuses?

myrenovations on March 18, 2009 at 12:08 PM

Retention rewards.

WashJeff on March 18, 2009 at 12:16 PM

Countdown to when Limbaugh picks this up.

forest on March 18, 2009 at 12:17 PM

I know it’s been said a million times…

…but imagine if Barney Frank, Chris Dodd, and Chuck Schumer were Republicans.

They’d be hanging from lampposts in DC by now.

MadisonConservative on March 18, 2009 at 12:17 PM

Great find! Time to spread this news! lol This ought to shut Bwarney Fwank’s mouth! umm…er, maybe not.

becki51758 on March 18, 2009 at 12:17 PM

If AIG’s retention bonuses are a problem, why aren’t Freddie Mac’s?

Because the Obama administration is using it to deflect from the TRILLIONS they are spending. Heck all of these bonuses are just a drop in the bucket to the Billions wasted in the bailout money that they have no idea on where it went. Of course the Media is playing along with the Obama administration to propagate this deflection from the real issue and problems with the TARP program and money.

Notice no one in the media has asked either President Obama or Treasury Secretary Geithner about the Housing and TARP money plans they promised over a month ago?

JeffinSac on March 18, 2009 at 12:18 PM

Can we find out who got paid on December 15, 2008, the first payout date?

SlimyBill on March 18, 2009 at 12:19 PM

“Lucy! YOU GOT SOME “SPLAININ’” TO DO!!

CynicalOptimist on March 18, 2009 at 12:20 PM

I’m glad that Obama has suceeded.

Da Bama has sucessfully proven, beyond any reasonable doubt, that the Democrat Party stands as the symbol of greed and corruption.

2010, here we come!!!

DannoJyd on March 18, 2009 at 12:22 PM

Boy does that sound good. Count me in on that one!

Keemo on March 18, 2009 at 12:06 PM

You got it my friend, in fact I’ll dub the voo-doo BBQ the HA Frank-n-Dodd roast in honor of all my fellow HA commentors. Also, Frank’s voo-doo doll will be dressed in women’s clothes hugging a weiner!

The BBQ will be set at medium heat as I wouldn’t want my Frank-n-Dodd to burn too quickly, but instead I want it to be slow roasted until it’s a crispy critter!

I’d feed it to my dog afterward but that would be animal cruelty!

Liberty or Death on March 18, 2009 at 12:22 PM

While everyone assails AIG

Clearly not everyone is assailing AIG.

for using less than 0.1% of the taxpayer-bailout money it received to meet contractual obligations in compensation through retention bonuses

The way over $100 million in so called “retention bonuses”, mostly to a relative few of the economic, and probably also criminal given all of AIG’s fraud, morons, is less than 0.1% of the taxpayer-bailout money ONLY because the taxpayer-bailout money is so Gargantuan!!!

MB4 on March 18, 2009 at 12:23 PM

If anyone would know about “retention,” it’d have to be Bahney Fwank….

MrScribbler on March 18, 2009 at 12:23 PM

By the way, if Josef Friztl was in America, instead of being on suicide watch, he’d be running for office. What’s worse is that he’d probably win. I mean, look at what Barney Frank is getting away with…. not to mention, his initials are BF….. hummmm… you fill in the blanks:
B____ F____.

CynicalOptimist on March 18, 2009 at 12:25 PM

FROM PAGE 303:

If we are unable to recruit and retain employees with the necessary skills, our ability to conduct our business activities effectively during the conservatorship may be adversely affected and our ability to return to long-term profitability may be impaired.

Our ability to recruit and retain employees with the necessary skills to conduct our business may be adversely
affected by the conservatorship, the uncertainty regarding its duration and the potential for future legislative or
regulatory actions that could significantly affect our status as a GSE and our role in the secondary mortgage market.

Although we have established a retention program providing for cash awards that are designed to help retain key
employees, we are not currently in a position to offer employees financial incentives that are equity-based and, as a result of this and other factors relating to the conservatorship that may affect our attractiveness as an employer, we may be at a competitive disadvantage compared to other potential employers. Accordingly, we may not be able to retain or replace employees with key skills and our ability to conduct our business effectively could be adversely affected.

Sounds familiar.

SlimyBill on March 18, 2009 at 12:25 PM

Hey, mention on Rush!

Johnson on March 18, 2009 at 12:28 PM

Nice find Ed! If this gets around, those bonuses are gone.

FuriousAmerican on March 18, 2009 at 11:54 AM

Doubt it … The Dems and those beholden to them (and vice versa) NEVER have to answer to corruption, bias, or hypocrisy on their side. They’ll just sweep it under the rug, as will their minions in the media. And if it’s not reported angrily in the mainstream media, it doesn’t exist for 60% of America.

eucher on March 18, 2009 at 12:28 PM

So,I was thinking,does this spill over into

ACORN,and like,are they written into the bailout

as well,maybe buried deep,in the bill,

jus sayin!

canopfor on March 18, 2009 at 12:28 PM

Countdown to when Limbaugh picks this up.

forest on March 18, 2009 at 12:17 PM

11 minutes!

forest on March 18, 2009 at 12:29 PM

Hey, mention on Rush!

Johnson on March 18, 2009 at 12:28 PM

Woot, woot!

rbj on March 18, 2009 at 12:29 PM

Better crank up the bandwidth Ed, Rush just cited this thread on his show!

GrayDog on March 18, 2009 at 12:29 PM

Yep, Rush just named Ed Morrisey & HotAir.com while reading some of Ed’s work…

You were on fire yesterday Ed; as was AP.

Keemo on March 18, 2009 at 12:29 PM

Rush is talking about this article right now. :D

Ortzinator on March 18, 2009 at 12:30 PM

Great find, Ed.

Rush is on this right now.

The more people exaggerate these problems, the more pressure there is on these companies, the less we will see in terms of affordable housing.”

lorien1973 on March 18, 2009 at 11:50 AM

Sounds like a plan to save taxpayers a big chunk of cash:)

Buy Danish on March 18, 2009 at 12:30 PM

Bonus-palooza!

batter on March 18, 2009 at 12:30 PM

Why are there only 2 buzz ups on this? Don’t you posters have yahoo accounts?

Security Mom on March 18, 2009 at 12:30 PM

Whenever something Barney Frank and Chris Dodd have done in Congress blows up, they’re busy looking for the next Richard Jewell to blame it on. That’s the extent of their solution to any problem.

RBMN on March 18, 2009 at 12:31 PM

not to mention, his initials are BF….. hummmm… you fill in the blanks:
B____ F____.

CynicalOptimist on March 18, 2009 at 12:25 PM

Sounds logical, apparently because Frank likes to be BF’d he thinks that American tax payers like it to, after all, what else could explain why Frank and Dodd BF’d America through FM/FM, the difference being however that we American tax payers weren’t even afforded lubrication prior to being BF’d let alone dinner and a movie prior to our BF’ing!

Just sayin…

Liberty or Death on March 18, 2009 at 12:31 PM

“If AIG’s retention bonuses are a problem, why aren’t Freddie Mac’s?”

I don’t know yet. Give us the names of the recipients so we can put them into Newsmeat and then I can tell you.

Dusty on March 18, 2009 at 12:32 PM

Bwahahahaha…. avert your eyes… The Banking Queen has no clothes….

Changucopia on March 18, 2009 at 12:32 PM

Congratulations, Ed.

Rush just plugged this thread on his show. :-)

Dave R. on March 18, 2009 at 12:34 PM

The way over $100 million in so called “retention bonuses”, mostly to a relative few of the economic, and probably also criminal given all of AIG’s fraud, morons,

MB4 on March 18, 2009 at 12:23 PM

You have information that we don’t? If they committed fraud, let’s prosecute. In the meantime, I prefer not to allow the government to override private contracts, especially after the fact.

Vashta.Nerada on March 18, 2009 at 12:34 PM

Eligibility includes all of the senior and executive VPs. It comes in four payouts, and only the last has any connection to company performance.

If it looks like a criminal enterprise, and walks like a criminal enterprise and smells like a criminal enterprise it is probably a ??

The U.S.A. has become a nation of the kleptocrats, by the kleptocrats and for the kleptocrats.

BTW, I just happened to hear el Rusbo talking about the “less than 0.1%”, crediting Hotair. I do think that el Rushbo has lost his “strategery” and this is all so easy!

Do: Connect the detonator to the explosives.
Don’t: Pet the detonator.
Really don’t: Stick the detonator in your mouth!

MB4 on March 18, 2009 at 12:34 PM

Fantastic journalistic work Ed. Now I am sure the MSM will take it from here!

carbon_footprint on March 18, 2009 at 12:35 PM

If AIG’s retention bonuses are a problem, why aren’t Freddie Mac’s?

I’ll take “Skimming from the Top” for 200 Alex.

Kini on March 18, 2009 at 12:35 PM

I ran my own business for 25 years. Bonuses and pay increases were always tied directly to employee performance and the employee’s contribution to the company’s overall performance.

It’s and old tired but true approach, giving employees an incentive to perform well and advance within the organization. I rewarded success. You didn’t perform, you received a nominal raise or none at all, and a bonus was out of the question.

I had a successful and profitable company. And yes, there were lean years but I got through them and never went crying to the government for any help.

These retention bonuses are pure BS, a clever little tool to make huge payouts to corporate hierarchy – irrespective of performance or bottom line profit. It’s outright theft, if you ask me.

fogw on March 18, 2009 at 12:37 PM

Here’s an idea: let us, each and every one, send this story to Drudge. This needs to be shouted!

carbon_footprint on March 18, 2009 at 12:37 PM

Bonus-palooza!

batter on March 18, 2009 at 12:30 PM

Bonulus.

SlimyBill on March 18, 2009 at 12:38 PM

RBMN on March 18, 2009 at 12:31 PM

One of my favorite posters from the CQ era. Comrade, where have you been. Regardless, good to see you here!

Keemo on March 18, 2009 at 12:38 PM

[carbon_footprint on March 18, 2009 at 12:35 PM]

LOL. Yes, but can journolist stop the mobs now?

Dusty on March 18, 2009 at 12:38 PM

We’re dealing with folksy who elected Barry, Bawney, Doddy, Nancy, and Harry. The argument needs to be dumbed-down further, if you hope to even have a chance of denting their thick skulls. They’ll just think, “Why are they blaming Bernie Mac’s relatives?

The argument here should be EPIC FAIL CONGRESS VOTES ITSELF VOLUNTARY PAY RAISE, BLAMES AIG FOR CONTRACTUAL BONUS CONGRESS APPROVED AS PART OF BAILOUT.

Tu quoque, while a logical fallacy, is highly logical in this context.

Christien on March 18, 2009 at 12:40 PM

BTW: One of the funniest Rush lines of the year; I’m challenging Obams’s teleprompter to a national debate.”

Laughed my ass off over that one.

Keemo on March 18, 2009 at 12:41 PM

You have information that we don’t? If they committed fraud, let’s prosecute. In the meantime, I prefer not to allow the government to override private contracts, especially after the fact.

Vashta.Nerada on March 18, 2009 at 12:34 PM

Think derivatives and credit swaps. There is no way on God’s Green Earth that they could possibly have thought they could cover them and the company execs kept telling the stock holders that everything is OK, don’t worry, be happy, while AIG’s stock price was going from tens of dollars to cents. They were a criminal enterprise.

MB4 on March 18, 2009 at 12:43 PM

I prefer not to allow the government to override private contracts, especially after the fact.

Vashta.Nerada on March 18, 2009 at 12:34 PM

Then ergo, you prefer a nation of the kleptocrats, by the kleptocrats and for the kleptocrats.

MB4 on March 18, 2009 at 12:45 PM

Stop! Please stop! I’m getting dizzy and sick to my stomach! Really though, it’s starting to look like a criminal enterprise and every member of the Congress who supported it with their vote is complicit in it.

Let’s start the inquisition!

BTW, “Ol’ Blue Lips” just said that he’s mad. Uh oh. we’re in trouble now…

Mr. Grump on March 18, 2009 at 12:46 PM

Twitters everywhere are exchanging talking points for our HA Fifth Column crew to chime in on. They are trying to decide if Bush will be mentioned in the opening statement.

Limerick on March 18, 2009 at 12:46 PM

Laura Ingraham Weighs in on Today’s Topics including A.I.G. To Big to Fail.

http://youhavetobethistalltogoonthisride.blogspot.com/2009/03/imus-guest-laura-ingraham-weighs-in-on.html

Dr Evil on March 18, 2009 at 12:47 PM

Then ergo, you prefer a nation of the kleptocrats, by the kleptocrats and for the kleptocrats.

MB4 on March 18, 2009 at 12:45 PM

No, I prefer the rule of law as opposed to mob rule. We have a constitution and bill of rights for a reason.

Vashta.Nerada on March 18, 2009 at 12:49 PM

what a bunch of asshats we have in congress.
Ed, I hope you dont mind, but i’m gonna copy and paste to Sen Lugar, (R) IN
thanks

UNREPENTANT CONSERVATIVE CAPITOLIST on March 18, 2009 at 12:50 PM

These retention bonuses are pure BS, a clever little tool to make huge payouts to corporate hierarchy – irrespective of performance or bottom line profit. It’s outright theft, if you ask me.

fogw on March 18, 2009 at 12:37 PM

Clearly so and for anyone not to see that one must close the eyes of his mind and keep them shut by force.

This all so much reminds me of that story about the guy who drowned after praying for God to save him.

MB4 on March 18, 2009 at 12:50 PM

!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!ATTENTION!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

To all H/A crew,since this mission(thread)requires
total concentration,

be advised,that the Rush Limbaugh show will be piped
to all stations,

love it,live it,and listen!

Mega-MegaTon Dittos,that is all,return to commenting,hehe!

canopfor on March 18, 2009 at 12:52 PM

can a private citizen tell the congress to go commit suicide, or is that line reserved only for congress to tell private citizens?

just curious how this all works

gatorboy on March 18, 2009 at 12:52 PM

No, I prefer the rule of law as opposed to mob rule. We have a constitution and bill of rights for a reason.

Vashta.Nerada on March 18, 2009 at 12:49 PM

There is no mob here. Well, other than the AIG/Fanny/Freddie/gooberment mob that is.

MB4 on March 18, 2009 at 12:52 PM

I swear, every time I see Barney Frank I just want to reach into my computer screen and…

Admittedly, I’m not a master of nuance, but I’m sensing some antipathy toward Frank here.

whitetop on March 18, 2009 at 12:13 PM

Was I that obvious in my comment? ;-) Heh, no one has ever accused me of being a subtle wall flower for sure!

Liberty or Death on March 18, 2009 at 12:53 PM

Well done Ed! Barney says its just a little PAY TO PLAY,(least we forget how truely perverted this man is) He’s just so vicious!!!

dmann on March 18, 2009 at 12:55 PM

Can someone explain to me how a sinking ship is supposed to retain people to make some attempt at turning things around WITHOUT incentivizing their workforce?

It’s a farce to pretend that businesses operate in a vaccuum and that these employees weren’t and aren’t bailing out themselves and going to other companies, and speeding the demise of the company.

Ask Chucky Chuck-U Shumer about how this all works after his ‘rumor’ with IndyMac and the ensuing carnage

gatorboy on March 18, 2009 at 12:56 PM

Hey, Carter -is- in the White House!

I thought it was just a metaphor.

lorien1973 on March 18, 2009 at 11:53 AM

That photo shows Carter’s too incompetent to find his own nostril.

Attila (Pillage Idiot) on March 18, 2009 at 12:56 PM

Us: Hey, America, the perps are inserting themselves front-and-center into the investigation!

America: Huh? Wuh? FwankenDodd and Barack don’t work for AIG! When’s Barack on Leno, hun?

Christien on March 18, 2009 at 12:57 PM

American tax payers weren’t even afforded lubrication prior to being BF’d let alone dinner and a movie prior to our BF’ing!

Just sayin…

Liberty or Death on March 18, 2009 at 12:31 PM

You took the vasoline right out of … well… I think we know were this is going and it’s not pretty (especially with the BFmeister….

CynicalOptimist on March 18, 2009 at 12:57 PM

Barney franks gave the entire world banking system
AIDS..
then todd poured gasoline all over it
and democraps set it on fire..

So why am i so shocked they want to reward these incompetent boobs
who barney franks just yesterday was screaming
about ripping oiff the tax payers when the ENTIRE DEMOCRAT CONGRESS APPROVED IT..

These congressmen all need to be taken out
and SHOT.

jcila on March 18, 2009 at 12:58 PM

Somehow I thought watching these guys fail would be more satisfying.

I just feel sad for my country. Maybe after 2012 and we get someone to clean up this mess I will feel like gloating.

Right now I just feel like there is no way out–we just get more and more vulnerable every second Barack Obama is in the Whitehouse.

This is change. Now I feel unsafe.

petunia on March 18, 2009 at 12:59 PM

Comment pages: 1 2


You must be logged in to post a comment.