Hot Air Mobile
Home The Vault Gear About
Hot Air -- get your fill


Good news: Fed pumps another $1 trillion into economy

posted at 9:30 pm on March 18, 2009 by Allahpundit
Share on Facebook | printer-friendly

I was confused when I saw the headline. Was this the same $1 trillion Michelle blogged about this morning? No, it turns out: That was $1.5 trillion for health care plus $2 trillion to fight climate change, both estimated expenses over the next decade. This $1 trillion is to cash out mortgage-backed securities and long-term Treasuries.

It’s important to keep your trillions straight.

As expected, the Fed kept its benchmark interest rate virtually at zero. But in a surprise, it drastically increased the amount of money it will create out of thin air to thaw out the still-frozen credit markets that have cramped lending to consumers and businesses alike.

The Fed said it would purchase an additional $750 billion worth of government-guaranteed mortgage-backed securities, on top of the $500 billion that it is currently in the process of buying. In addition, the Fed said it would buy up to $300 billion worth of longer-term Treasury securities over the next six months. That would tend to push down longer-term interest rates on loans of all types.

All of these measures would come in addition to what has already been an unprecedented expansion of lending by the Fed. Since last September, the central bank has roughly doubled the size of its balance sheet to nearly $2 trillion from $900 billion — even before the action Wednesday — mainly because of its efforts to rescue credit markets…

Starting last September, the new lending programs — including money for bailouts of individual companies like Citigroup, American International Group and Bank of America — have caused the Fed to print new money at the fastest pace in history. But much of that money has remained dormant, because the economic downturn has made banks reluctant to lend and businesses and consumers either reluctant or unable to borrow.

Below you’ll find some completely unrelated viewing. Exit question for amateur (and non-amateur) economists: What’s the bigger risk, deflation or inflation?


Blowback

Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.

Trackbacks/Pings

Trackback URL

Comments

Comment pages: 1 2

getalife on March 18, 2009 at 11:11 PM

Your man is sinking the ship.

Johan Klaus on March 18, 2009 at 11:31 PM

The thermometer is going lower, more than it went higher before.
Time there was warmth and plenty, but that cup soon runneth no more.
Though we could not caution all, we still might warn a few:
Dont lend your hand to raise no flag atop no ship of fools.

Ship of fools on a cold cruel sea
Ship of fools sail away from we.
It was later than we thought, when we still might have believed, getalife, as you,
Now we cannot share your delusions, ship of fools.

MB4 on March 18, 2009 at 11:37 PM

I see right now they sell uncut sheets of the one dollar bill. Soon we will probably all be carrying around tubes of uncut sheets of 1000 dollar bills the way they are going.

boomer on March 18, 2009 at 11:46 PM

The Weimer Republic (Weimarer Republik).

Johan Klaus on March 18, 2009 at 11:58 PM

boomer on March 18, 2009 at 11:46 PM

I had a relative, who was in the Navy, and he would put a ten dollar bill around a big roll of Chinese Yen to try to impress the girls.

Johan Klaus on March 19, 2009 at 12:02 AM

“Money for nothing.”

Chicks for free.

Always look on the bright side of life (or death.)

notropis on March 19, 2009 at 12:23 AM

“Money for nothing.”

Chicks for free.

Always look on the bright side of life (or death.)

notropis on March 19, 2009 at 12:23 AM

Welfare madness.

Johan Klaus on March 19, 2009 at 12:25 AM

How much more does the Fed have to spend before it becomes cheaper to just give every taxpayer a million bucks and we all retire?
Guardian on March 18, 2009 at 9:52 PM

Well, now, that’s just silly. The people that will be given a million bucks will be the people who DON’T pay taxes…..
In the name of ‘economic justice’.

Them, and incompetent financiers who pay off politicians. There has got to be several of those people who haven’t gotten their several million each of taxpayer paid bonuses yet.

But regular old taxpayers? Pfaw. They DESERVE to be punished for having the audacity to achieve.
/sarc

LegendHasIt on March 19, 2009 at 12:30 AM

A trillion here, a trillion there. Pretty soon we’re talking serious money!

miron on March 19, 2009 at 12:30 AM

The thing that has frozen the markets is that everyone is waiting for BO to pick the next winner in the formerly free market. They’re waiting to see who the socialists will favor before moving.

We’re so screwed. Thanks, ignorant Barry-O voters.

Mojave Mark on March 19, 2009 at 12:31 AM

On the good ship Axiom
Its a quick trip to the candy shop
Where democrats play
On the money beach at Stimulus Bay!

Limerick on March 19, 2009 at 12:35 AM

Exit question for amateur (and non-amateur) economists: What’s the bigger risk, deflation or inflation?

Well, we’ll have another 3 trillion dollars or so of cash chasing around assets. Will we have another 3 trillion worth of new assets? No? In fact projections are showing decreased manufacturing and less things to buy?

So, more money, less things to buy. Will money in this situation be more or less valuable? Um, is this a trick question?

I may be an amateur economist, but I think I’ll stake my reputaton on “inflation”; and I’m looking to shift around some assets accordingly.

gekkobear on March 19, 2009 at 12:37 AM

How could my college economics professors be so wrong.

Johan Klaus on March 19, 2009 at 12:45 AM

In addition, the Fed said it would buy up to $300 billion worth of longer-term Treasury securities over the next six months. That would tend to push down longer-term interest rates on loans of all types.

As I understand it, it would also tend to cause this.

Rae on March 19, 2009 at 1:20 AM

Your representatives pigs in Washington, D.C., all branches.

Entelechy on March 19, 2009 at 1:45 AM

This is almost too damn depressing to see.

Chaz706 on March 19, 2009 at 2:08 AM

Can someone help me please?

Brain is functioning even worse than usual, and I just can’t keep track…

All total: (to the nearest hundred billion or so) Just today (or yesterday, depending on which time zone you are in) How much money did those assorted and collective idiots and crooks in Washington spend / promise / steal / give away / waste / create fiat out of nothingness etc.????

Not counting debt service and inflationary effects, it looks like around five trillion… But I may be duplicating a couple of things because of differing nomenclatures.

LegendHasIt on March 19, 2009 at 2:19 AM

Let’s see…

Carbon Tax: 2,000,000,000,000
Printing Money outta nowhere: 1,000,000,000,000
Socialized Health Care: 1,500,000,000,000

Yeah, that’s 4,500,000,000,000

Not bad for a day’s “work”!

gmoonster on March 19, 2009 at 2:44 AM

Starting last September, the new lending programs — including money for bailouts of individual companies like Citigroup, American International Group and Bank of America — have caused the Fed to print new money at the fastest pace in history

The cool part is they are not printing money. These dollars are electronic transactions installed into a system without being deducted from elsewhere, such as the total tax revenues available line in Treasury reports.

Effectively, the U.S. is financing its own debt by purchasings its own debt notes, Treasuries, by simply filling in the ‘amount paid’ line with a number created out of thin air. Very like buying groceries without adding money to the cash register. Once the debt note is issued, I suppose the Treasury can actually talk itself into printing paper dollars to represent the ‘loan’

I had an argument with an economist (for a big three company) some years ago. He argued that we should simply cancel our national debt instead of trying to pay it. Effectively we are doing that. The elementary way to accomplish this would be to cancel currency outstanding and issue new currency but that is so ‘Weimar Republic’. Instead, we add a few decimal places to the total revenue line at Treasury and declare ourselves solvent which de facto cancels our currency by inflation.

Right now, they are betting correctly that inflation will not be rampant like Venezuala or Eastern Europe because those nations are in so much worse shape the American dollar is still a safe haven. That does not mean foreigners will buy our Treasuries. They must have slowed down for the agency to start buying it’s own notes, but it does mean many foreigners may still prefer to barter for U.S. dollars than their own totally dead paper

If we bought every toaster made in China, while GE would garner some profits, our own citizens would have received only toasters, and not paychecks, and be out the price of a toaster. The system is currently self depleting, minus the value of our assets, which still exceed Venezuala’s assets

I can understand printing dollars to end a credit crunch, but the Obama spending spree is exceeding the credit crunch and is directed to create gigantic perpetuating debt, not to pay off the old balances or fill the gap of deflated asset values.

China has to be gasping because as we buy our own Treasuries with mythical dollars their U.S. Treasuries are shrinking. I can feel the nuclear fallout already

entagor on March 19, 2009 at 3:21 AM

Thats Trillion with a T!

Damn what comes after that? Flazillion?

johnnyU on March 19, 2009 at 5:12 AM

Let’s see…

Carbon Tax: 2,000,000,000,000
Printing Money outta nowhere: 1,000,000,000,000
Socialized Health Care: 1,500,000,000,000

Yeah, that’s 4,500,000,000,000

Not bad for a day’s “work”!

gmoonster on March 19, 2009 at 2:44 AM

Its so corrupt we don’t have politicians to prosecute the politicians! You laugh, but its true!

johnnyU on March 19, 2009 at 5:16 AM

Thats Trillion with a T!
Damn what comes after that? Flazillion?

Um no, but close. That would be quadrillion, and quadrillion is the true notional value of all the derivatives floating around the balance sheets of the world. All paper will burn, that is why China is targeting hard assets for their strategic positioning going forward. The developing (intelligent) world never was going to follow us into CO2icide, so oil will still be a player, large as ever.

rhodeymark on March 19, 2009 at 5:56 AM

End the Fed.

The Dean on March 19, 2009 at 6:59 AM

Heard some commentator on CNBC SquawkBox show give a sigh of relief (pehaps being sarcastic) while saying “Now we don’t have to worry about China not wanting to buy our long-term debt, we buy it ourselves!”

The U.S. issues bonds, then “prints” money to buy its own bonds.
So why don’t they do this all the time?
Issue bonds, then buy them themselves?
What could possibly go wrong?

albill on March 19, 2009 at 7:23 AM

Well on the bright side, we have death to look forward to.

TheSitRep on March 19, 2009 at 7:31 AM

The U.S. issues bonds, then “prints” money to buy its own bonds.
So why don’t they do this all the time?
Issue bonds, then buy them themselves?
What could possibly go wrong?

albill on March 19, 2009 at 7:23 AM

We don’t print anything! The private corporation, the Federal Reserve, that we have indebted our children too (that we will never be able to pay back) does the printing. These effing politicians are selling us out!

“I believe that banking institutions are more dangerous to our liberties than standing armies . . . If the American people ever allow private banks to control the issue of their currency, first by inflation, then by deflation, the banks and corporations that will grow up around [the banks] . . . will deprive the people of all property until their children wake-up homeless on the continent their fathers conquered . . . The issuing power should be taken from the banks and restored to the people, to whom it properly belongs.” — Thomas Jefferson — The Debate Over The Recharter Of The Bank Bill, (1809)

True_King on March 19, 2009 at 7:35 AM

The cool part is they are not printing money. These dollars are electronic transactions installed into a system without being deducted from elsewhere, such as the total tax revenues available line in Treasury reports.

Effectively, the U.S. is financing its own debt by purchasings its own debt notes.

entagor

This looks like a Ponzi scheme. For which Bernie Madoff is going to jail for a long time.

But when the One’s hero FDR does it with Social Security, and LBJ takes the SS money and “invests” it in Treasuries to finance his grand plans….

Wethal on March 19, 2009 at 7:41 AM

The old AIG Bonus misdirection play.

marklmail on March 19, 2009 at 7:48 AM

There is mounting evidence that China’s central bank is undertaking the process of divesting itself of longer-dated US Treasuries in favor of shorter-dated ones.

There is also mounting evidence that China’s increasingly energetic new campaign of capitalizing on the global crisis by making resource buys across the globe may be (1) helping its central bank to decrease exposure to the dollar, while (2) simultaneously positioning China to make much greater profit on its investment of its reserves into hard assets whose prices are now greatly beaten down, while (3) also affording it greatly increased control of strategic resources and the geopolitical clout that goes with it. This is turning out to be a win-win-win situation for China as it capitalizes upon the important opportunities afforded it by the present global crisis.

HT: Instapundit.

Time for more “smart diplomacy” by Hillary?

Wethal on March 19, 2009 at 7:52 AM

This looks like a Ponzi scheme. For which Bernie Madoff is going to jail for a long time.

But when the One’s hero FDR does it with Social Security, and LBJ takes the SS money and “invests” it in Treasuries to finance his grand plans….

Wethal on March 19, 2009 at 7:41 AM

When the US was declared bankrupt in 1933 FDR needed collateral to borrow from the Fed Res, he created SS as collateral. In essence, you and your children were used as collateral for the international bankers.

All this time both political parties have known this and done very little to address it.

True_King on March 19, 2009 at 8:09 AM

wait, these trillions for “healthcare”reform (socialized medicine) & “green” initiatives (cap ‘n trade)–don’t they have to be voted on by Congress?

did Congress vote on these things?

kelley in virginia on March 19, 2009 at 8:10 AM

True_King on March 19, 2009 at 8:09 AM

Just before 9/11, I recall the Dems chanting “Lockbox, lockbox,” Tom Daschle in particular. It was about Social Security. 9/11 took priority.

Wethal on March 19, 2009 at 8:12 AM

HT: Instapundit.

Time for more “smart diplomacy” by Hillary?

Wethal on March 19, 2009 at 7:52 AM

Peter Schiff predicted this years ago.

Just to clarify again. We are NOT financing our own debt, we are simply creating treasuries and the Federal Reserve is creating the money. We don’t create money, the banksters do, we just agree to take on the debt.

True_King on March 19, 2009 at 8:12 AM

it drastically increased the amount of money it will create out of thin air

Looks like we will have Zimbabwe money soon.

JeffinSac on March 19, 2009 at 8:18 AM

This movie gives a good rundown of how things are organized in Washington, the UN, and the Federal Reserve. Don’t let the title deceive you, remember that Bush is equally if not more responsible for selling us out to the Reserve and their NWO cronies.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eAaQNACwaLw

True_King on March 19, 2009 at 8:19 AM

I wouldn’t call it completely unrelated.

Jamewah on March 19, 2009 at 9:06 AM

The Fed can pretty much do whatever the hell it wants because it doesn’t have to answer to anybody, nor is it a public institution. The banking oligarchs, who have funded every side of every conflict since this country has existed, create the booms and the busts that help enact “emergency” legislation that fleeces the public. The next time a fed chairman comes to us and puts a gun to our head saying give us 700 billion or else, we should just return the favor. And people wonder why Andrew Jackson created such a fuss over this stuff.

LevStrauss on March 19, 2009 at 9:09 AM

The more that I study our situation the more I’m beginning to think that our economic destruction is a coordinated effort. Take the monetization of our debt, the powers that be know that this has never worked. Why then do it?

Either they are that stupid or there is a group behind the curtain trying to bring this nation down, and I don’t mean the Democrats.

The new world order is at the door. We can still stop it though, we need to coordinate!

True_King on March 19, 2009 at 9:13 AM

The more that I study our situation the more I’m beginning to think that our economic destruction is a coordinated effort. Take the monetization of our debt, the powers that be know that this has never worked. Why then do it?

Either they are that stupid or there is a group behind the curtain trying to bring this nation down, and I don’t mean the Democrats.

Because it’s the coward’s way out. It feels good to begin with and puts off the pain until later. The alternative is to cut spending, but that brings the pain today, with the advantages being realized only in the future. Cowards monetize.

That explains, to my satisfaction, the reason why most are monetizing the debt. The Precedent, however, wants this fire to burn the US to the ground, which is all he’s wanted to do for a very long time. It is an evil symbiotic relationship of the cowards and The Precedent (and his fellow, true American-hating comrades).

The new world order is at the door. We can still stop it though, we need to coordinate!

True_King on March 19, 2009 at 9:13 AM

There is an utterly insane push for globalism, mostly coming out of the lunatic left, along with a few fools on the “right”, like Bush.

progressoverpeace on March 19, 2009 at 9:26 AM

Here is Karl Denninger’s response to the FED announcement.

Karl’s predictions over the past two years have been closer to right than anyone else I am aware of, including Peter Schiff. Allah won’t like him because he has been a Beck guest. But Karl’s speech at CPAC was one ever conservative needed to hear.

flyfisher on March 19, 2009 at 10:09 AM

Thank god they put more money in, my dog was wondering where we would go to catch a frisbee, and apparently he will be getting his dog park, he will be excited.

workingforpigs on March 19, 2009 at 10:29 AM

Karl’s predictions over the past two years have been closer to right than anyone else I am aware of

flyfisher on March 19, 2009 at 10:09 AM

Denninger has had some very good predictions, but sometimes I don’t know what to think about his writings. A couple of days ago he reacted with great excitement to the news that Barney Frank (!) would be investigating any wrongdoers that helped cause the current financial situation. It’s like the fox launching an investigation into who attacked the chicken coop, but Denninger actually seemed to think that this could somehow save the system. Of course, this makes no sense and left me really doubting his handle on some aspects of the big picture.

Ever since that, I’ve viewed his writings with some skepticism, though I do agree that he has made some very good calls and deserves credit.

Beatnik Joe on March 19, 2009 at 11:16 AM

BTW, this will depress the dollar, so look for stories about how oil is climbing. The fact that oil is a commodity that trades in dollars, so as the dollar decreases in value, oil rises, will be overlooked. Better to blame the evil oil companies.

Vashta.Nerada on March 19, 2009 at 11:20 AM

Allah

Have you seen this Barack Obama’s Teleprompter has a Blog.

http://baracksteleprompter.blogspot.com/

Dr Evil on March 19, 2009 at 11:22 AM

Have you seen this Barack Obama’s Teleprompter has a Blog.

Love the Teleprompter. Finally, someone with some brains in that Administration.

Wyznowski on March 19, 2009 at 12:58 PM

They are printing money so fast
even communist china is AFRAID..

of loosing their shirts..

they see what happened to zimbabwe
hell even the communists KNOW
communism doesnt work

so they put all their money into the us
and now are shocked as one of their own
TRAINEES – OBAMA
is running all the world into
RUIN.

May God help us all..

you idiots voted for the democraps
you deserve what the hell you get..

jcila on March 19, 2009 at 3:14 PM

PercyB on March 18, 2009 at 11:14 PM

Awesome!!

OneConservative on March 19, 2009 at 5:47 PM

So, what will happen when they cook up another bogus distraction like the AIG bonus “scandal,” sell us out to the Chicoms in another one of those overnight, “emergency” votes?

Oh, wait…

Face it, folks, we’re forked.

-Dave

Dave R. on March 19, 2009 at 6:31 PM

Comment pages: 1 2


You must be logged in to post a comment.