Hot Air Mobile
Home The Vault Gear About
Hot Air -- get your fill


Evan Bayh’s new gang targets Obama agenda; Update: Video added

posted at 10:22 am on March 18, 2009 by Ed Morrissey
Share on Facebook | printer-friendly

Republicans aren’t the only people growing disenchanted by Hope and Change through Incompetence, it seems.  Evan Bayh, who got passed over as Obama’s running mate, has formed a new Gang of 15 in the Senate, only this gang is exclusively Democrats.  They want to put some speed limits on Obama’s agenda:

There is rising doubt among Democrats — particularly moderates already concerned about the big costs and deficits called for in Obama’s budget — that either Obama or Washington have enough bandwidth this year to stimulate the economy, overhaul the failed financial sector and move on to a far-reaching domestic agenda.

“From the standpoint of the Congress, there’s only so much that we can absorb and do at one time,” Sen. Daniel Inouye (D-Hawaii), the chairman of the Appropriations Committee, told POLITICO Tuesday. “To maintain a schedule like the one we’ve got at this moment, throughout the year, I don’t know if it will be healthy.”

Democrats’ comments were muted, with few directly criticizing Obama for being too ambitious. But several lawmakers made clear that they have trouble with Obama’s logic that deep economic troubles make it more urgent, not less, to take on expensive projects such as health care and education reform.

“Everybody has to bring something to the table,” said Indiana Sen. Evan Bayh, a leader of a 15-member caucus of conservative and centrist Democrats. “That doesn’t mean that you have to postpone your aspirations forever. But until we’re through this crisis and growth has resumed, there’s going to be some belt-tightening that’s necessary.”

These doubts reflect conflicting currents in Obama’s political circumstances just 60 days into his administration.

Bayh launched this effort on MS-NBC’s Morning Joe program this morning, telling viewers that concerns have risen about the direction of the administration already.  Coming from Obama’s own party, that’s remarkable in a couple of ways.  First, Democrats have near-total control already of the process, and have already found enough Republicans to get around any procedural roadblocks.  They don’t need to do any outreach to the Republicans or centrists in order to get their agenda through Congress.

Even more surprising is the timing.  The media has engaged in a little self-flaggelation for not giving Obama the supposedly traditional 100 days to demonstrate competence and fully shape the agenda.  Now, even Obama’s own party has called off the honeymoon.  Bayh and his fellow gang members have seen enough already to set off the alarm bells.

This will make it much more difficult for Obama to sell himself as a moderate, both in the midterms and in 2012.  When one’s own party has to have its moderates differentiate themselves from White House policy, it makes the President look extremist and intemperate.  Bayh will also force the media to cover that angle, where (as with the Hamilton appointment) they might prefer to parrot the administration’s self-congratulatory messages of their own moderation.

Perhaps Obama should have selected Bayh for his running mate after all.  It didn’t make a difference in the last election, but it might make a difference in the next.

Update: Here’s the Morning Joe video:

Try to catch all the Mafia references. Dead fishes, Witness Protection Programs, body bags … is this the White House, or a compound on Lake Tahoe?


Blowback

Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.

Trackbacks/Pings

Trackback URL

Comments

Comment pages: 1 2

A reporter just asked him about that. He didn’t answer.
genso on March 18, 2009 at 12:53 PM

How dare you criticize Obama’s patriotism?

Racist!

logis on March 18, 2009 at 1:08 PM

FYI – I just tried calling Bayh’s office (he’s my senator) and his mailbox is full.

Either the GOP’s are calling to cheer him on, or he’s getting death threats from the left!

Oink on March 18, 2009 at 1:13 PM

Yoop on March 18, 2009 at 12:44 PM

Yep, they will regulate to stop these fake outrages.

Here is the real outrage:

The Real AIG Scandal:

http://www.slate.com/id/2213942/

Told ya it was a distraction.

They are using your money to pay the banks back on their gambling losses to keep this corrupt financial system from collapsing.

Then they will regulate to keep it from happening again and these banks will eventually pay back your money.

Now, if your party gets power again, they will deregulate and destroy the economy again.

Why in the world would you want to destroy the economy again?

getalife on March 18, 2009 at 1:19 PM

Try to catch all the Mafia references. Dead fishes, Witness Protection Programs, body bags … is this the White House, or a compound on Lake Tahoe?

Bayh said he hadn’t yet received a mackerel in the mail.

All the same, I’m betting that his name got scratched off the list to be invited to Obama’s party on the night of the NCAA final.

Now, if your party gets power again, they will deregulate and destroy the economy again.

Why in the world would you want to destroy the economy again?

getalife on March 18, 2009 at 1:19 PM

You may consider this a chicken-and-egg problem, but I argue that things started with Democratic insistence on homeownership for people who couldn’t afford to pay their mortgages. Keep chattering about regulation, but it all begins with bad lending demanded by Democrats and accelerated with Fannie and Freddie. These turds are the last third of the puzzle.

BuckeyeSam on March 18, 2009 at 1:29 PM

OMG, he is speaking without a teleprompter to shoot that silly argument down.

Sell it President.

getalife on March 18, 2009 at 12:38 PM

Getalife, please explain why your President would not answer the question about his receiving $101,000+ in campaign contributions from AIG?

Legitimate question.

Knucklehead on March 18, 2009 at 1:49 PM

Knucklehead on March 18, 2009 at 1:49 PM

Because he spent it and won.

getalife on March 18, 2009 at 1:50 PM

Because he spent it and won.
getalife on March 18, 2009 at 1:50 PM

This is an excellent point: liberals worship power SOLELY for the sake of power.

But comitted Communists are always going to be a very small percentage of the American electorate. They can’t win elections without the support of the politically illiterate masses who live their lives in a conservative fashion but are amenable to liberal propaganda. And the average American is getting a very very ugly wake up call about the greed and power-lust they just elected into office.

The 2010 elections are going to be a blood bath. By 2012, this will be a very different America than it is today. Hopefully the incredibly painful and expensive lesson will stick longer than it did last time – but does it ever?

logis on March 18, 2009 at 1:59 PM

but does it ever?

logis on March 18, 2009 at 1:59 PM

No, Americans have short attention spans.

If the economy revovers you will lose, if not you can finish it off.

getalife on March 18, 2009 at 2:02 PM

Because he spent it and won.
getalife on March 18, 2009 at 1:50 PM

Ya, we all know he won, he’s reminded us of that fact more times that we care to hear. So if that’s your answer, why didn’t he answer the question if its as simple as that? Where is his honesty and that transparency he promised?

Knucklehead on March 18, 2009 at 2:02 PM

Knucklehead on March 18, 2009 at 2:02 PM

He is a politician.

Hell, I am surprised he is keeping any promises.

getalife on March 18, 2009 at 2:04 PM

Because he spent it and won.
getalife on March 18, 2009 at 1:50 PM

Ya, we all know he won, he’s reminded us of that fact more times that we care to hear. So if that’s your answer, why didn’t he answer the question if its as simple as that? Where is his honesty and that transparency he promised?
Knucklehead on March 18, 2009 at 2:02 PM

Quit badgering the guy; he answers that question with every post.

Obama ran on the platform of audacity. He demanded (and received) a mandate for unqualified change — of anything he wants, anytime he wants and in any way he wants. In other words: Obama is the Ultimate Liberal Polititian: He is arrogance incarnate.

Hell, if Obama DID deign to acknowledge that it’s possible for a mere mortal to question the actions of a god, that would diminish Him in the eyes of His believers.

logis on March 18, 2009 at 2:44 PM

One of his “gang” is Sen. Begich from my state of Alaska (according to Begich himself and posted in the local newspaper)…it may be the only thing Begich has done right so far. Sorry Alaska couldn’t have done better.

shirk on March 18, 2009 at 3:21 PM

Apparently Democrats have their own John McCain :) Its about time the blue dogs stood up!

Conservative Voice on March 18, 2009 at 3:50 PM

Can’t we get someone to sneak a couple of lines on the Obamaprompter, i.e., “I now tender my resignation, effective immediately.”

joedoe on March 18, 2009 at 10:27 AM

LOL! I thought about that this morning. Great Minds…

” I Barack Obama, hereby admit that I am a failure. I am sorry. I resign. I am going to return to being a successful community organizer in Chicago. Thanks for letting me almost ruin your Country”

Key West Reader on March 18, 2009 at 4:24 PM

I am from Indiana and when Bayh was Governor he governed like a moderate. He was almost conservative when it came to money. He did not make promises for the sake of getting gullible people to vote for him.

Guys like this, who really did try to balance a budget and who said no from time to time probably resent being passed over for some spend thrift incompetent like Obama.

Terrye on March 18, 2009 at 8:00 PM

I hope he’s standing on principle. If he is, I wish him the best of luck, but he won’t need it for he stands on a firm foundation. If not, than nothing and no one will save him!

Chaz706 on March 19, 2009 at 2:18 AM

Evan Bayh was not a “bad” governor (not great, either), and is probably a nice guy, but that (D) makes him radioactive and untrustworthy. I repeat: Trust him at your peril.

SKYFOX on March 19, 2009 at 5:05 AM

I lived in Indiana (went to IU) while Bayh was governor. Compared to my current governor (NJ, Corzine), I love the guy. I thought he wasn’t half bad at governing, and I had high hopes for him as a senator.

Until now, he has been a senatorial disappointment, stridently leftist. I think he has been trying to position himself left of where his heart really is in an endeavor to set himself up for a run at 1600 PA Ave. Of course, with that kind of move, his chances of stealing a vote from me if/when he does make such an announcement go down.

I’m glad to see that Bayh has learned a lesson and is returning to who I believe him to be, a fighter for common sense. That lesson is that, when you’re dealing with the devil, you’re going to get the short end of the stick. My analogy isn’t intended to be 100% direct, although one never knows, I suppose. Bayh threw his support behind Obama, and now he’s understandably nervous. Hoosiers are better, smarter, more morally sound people than what Obama has fed us. He has to think about his own seat, of course, but I think he’s thinking about his country, too.

Way to go, Senator Bayh. In these matters, you have my support. You’ll have to re-earn some of my trust, but you’re off to a good start.

flutejpl on March 19, 2009 at 8:29 AM

Comment pages: 1 2


You must be logged in to post a comment.