<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The bailout backlash problem</title>
	<atom:link href="http://hotair.com/archives/2009/03/16/the-bailout-backlash-problem/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/03/16/the-bailout-backlash-problem/</link>
	<description>The world’s first, full-service conservative Internet broadcast network</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2012 05:58:36 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: The bailout backlash problem &#171; Top Daily Digest Reading</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/03/16/the-bailout-backlash-problem/comment-page-2/#comment-2034923</link>
		<dc:creator>The bailout backlash problem &#171; Top Daily Digest Reading</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Mar 2009 07:25:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=46912#comment-2034923</guid>
		<description>[...] Read more here. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Read more here. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SKYFOX</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/03/16/the-bailout-backlash-problem/comment-page-2/#comment-1990474</link>
		<dc:creator>SKYFOX</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Mar 2009 09:23:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=46912#comment-1990474</guid>
		<description>New posters may come to the conclusion that we are a cynical bunch here at Hotair. They would be right, but they should know that we come by our cynicism honestly.  This young administration, bereft of any foresight, insight or maybe even hindsight, has stoked cynicism.  Hell, it&#039;s fed it like a hungry sumo at a buffet.  
Every act of the messiah has been to calculated to entrench government control over some aspect of our private lives and businesses, weaken the foundational freedoms we thought were sacred and turn us into fearful, timid subjects of a &quot;benevolent&quot; god-king, meekly waiting for the next handout and praying it will be the solution to a disaster we don&#039;t even recognize was of our own making.
I believe that many of us will refuse to go quietly.  Without leadership, some will act rashly.  I choose to wait for that leader, but I won&#039;t wait forever.  Letters and phone calls will hold off torches and pitchforks only so long.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>New posters may come to the conclusion that we are a cynical bunch here at Hotair. They would be right, but they should know that we come by our cynicism honestly.  This young administration, bereft of any foresight, insight or maybe even hindsight, has stoked cynicism.  Hell, it&#8217;s fed it like a hungry sumo at a buffet.<br />
Every act of the messiah has been to calculated to entrench government control over some aspect of our private lives and businesses, weaken the foundational freedoms we thought were sacred and turn us into fearful, timid subjects of a &#8220;benevolent&#8221; god-king, meekly waiting for the next handout and praying it will be the solution to a disaster we don&#8217;t even recognize was of our own making.<br />
I believe that many of us will refuse to go quietly.  Without leadership, some will act rashly.  I choose to wait for that leader, but I won&#8217;t wait forever.  Letters and phone calls will hold off torches and pitchforks only so long.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dr. Charles G. Waugh</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/03/16/the-bailout-backlash-problem/comment-page-2/#comment-1988982</link>
		<dc:creator>Dr. Charles G. Waugh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Mar 2009 23:12:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=46912#comment-1988982</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;. . .class warfare is all Obama has in his arsenal.&lt;/strong&gt;

How about &quot;. . .class warfare is all Obama has up his arsenal.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>. . .class warfare is all Obama has in his arsenal.</strong></p>
<p>How about &#8220;. . .class warfare is all Obama has up his arsenal.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kanda</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/03/16/the-bailout-backlash-problem/comment-page-2/#comment-1988642</link>
		<dc:creator>kanda</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Mar 2009 22:04:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=46912#comment-1988642</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;Old Country Boy on March 16, 2009 at 5:35 PM&lt;/blockquote&gt;

A few years back when Enron died many people lost a lot of money they had invested. Many stockholders were employees who had only Enron stock as a cushion for what life would bring. They lost everything. The same is happening now to many honest men and women. We have no leaders who are bold and decisive. Sometimes we just need a decision even if it is wrong just to right the ship and set it on a course then guide it around the danger spots. An analogy to what we are doing now is like trying to bail out the titanic with a bucket after it hit the iceberg. It&#039;s time for the liferafts and like the titanic we don&#039;t seem to have enough so we continue with the buckets. 

We have not heard yet the true extent of the longer term losses to retirement funds and other accounts from this latest crisis. How much was lost from the pension funds of corporate america or private ones. That is money needed to pay for retirement. When those funds fall below a certain level the a company must make up the difference. How will that affect the bottom line. How many jobs will that cost. What will that mean to the national economy. What about the dividend cuts the government is forcing on the companies taking the bank bailouts. Think of the widows and old couples invested in high grade financial securites that turned to junk overnight. They depend on those dividends to pay for food and shelter. It&#039;s nice to worry about the fat cat corporate executives and how terrible it is they don&#039;t get a bonus but who still they get their 7 figure salary. This isn&#039;t over yet. This is a tremendous wealth drain going on worldwide. I hope the government can turn it around but it has never happened before in history. In America I feel the best we can hope for is the governement can buy time until corporate america can purge itself of the corruption and rebuild our economy on solid ground. It&#039;s going to take years. Maybe even another great depression before we are successful unless we get control of it soon. 
The clowns calling this class warfare have no clue as you pointed out earlier. Most of us here at hot air are capitalists or we would be on huffpo. We are sometimes like nero fiddling while rome burns. Many of us here have no issue until it hits them personally. That is the saddest fact of all. We only care about ourselves. It is time we admit the truth and get this fixed before we lose it all.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Old Country Boy on March 16, 2009 at 5:35 PM</p></blockquote>
<p>A few years back when Enron died many people lost a lot of money they had invested. Many stockholders were employees who had only Enron stock as a cushion for what life would bring. They lost everything. The same is happening now to many honest men and women. We have no leaders who are bold and decisive. Sometimes we just need a decision even if it is wrong just to right the ship and set it on a course then guide it around the danger spots. An analogy to what we are doing now is like trying to bail out the titanic with a bucket after it hit the iceberg. It&#8217;s time for the liferafts and like the titanic we don&#8217;t seem to have enough so we continue with the buckets. </p>
<p>We have not heard yet the true extent of the longer term losses to retirement funds and other accounts from this latest crisis. How much was lost from the pension funds of corporate america or private ones. That is money needed to pay for retirement. When those funds fall below a certain level the a company must make up the difference. How will that affect the bottom line. How many jobs will that cost. What will that mean to the national economy. What about the dividend cuts the government is forcing on the companies taking the bank bailouts. Think of the widows and old couples invested in high grade financial securites that turned to junk overnight. They depend on those dividends to pay for food and shelter. It&#8217;s nice to worry about the fat cat corporate executives and how terrible it is they don&#8217;t get a bonus but who still they get their 7 figure salary. This isn&#8217;t over yet. This is a tremendous wealth drain going on worldwide. I hope the government can turn it around but it has never happened before in history. In America I feel the best we can hope for is the governement can buy time until corporate america can purge itself of the corruption and rebuild our economy on solid ground. It&#8217;s going to take years. Maybe even another great depression before we are successful unless we get control of it soon.<br />
The clowns calling this class warfare have no clue as you pointed out earlier. Most of us here at hot air are capitalists or we would be on huffpo. We are sometimes like nero fiddling while rome burns. Many of us here have no issue until it hits them personally. That is the saddest fact of all. We only care about ourselves. It is time we admit the truth and get this fixed before we lose it all.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Old Country Boy</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/03/16/the-bailout-backlash-problem/comment-page-2/#comment-1988518</link>
		<dc:creator>Old Country Boy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Mar 2009 21:35:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=46912#comment-1988518</guid>
		<description>Kanda, thanks for the link.  I think you are probably right that readers will probably say that it&#039;s that&#039;s business and let it go.  However this &quot;that&#039;s business&quot; caused a lot of good people to pay $4.00 a gallon for gasoline then blame Bush or the oil companies.  This &quot;that&#039;s business&quot; led a lot of good people to stay at congress and protest with a &lt;em&gt;drill now&lt;/em&gt;.  Now that we know that the whole thing was part of a &quot;that&#039;s business&quot; scheme to get rich off the rest of us, what will happen when we really do need to &lt;em&gt;drill now&lt;/em&gt;?  This little bout of avarice is a cry wolf that will hurt even worse next time.  You know, those scurrlious b......., the Hunt brothers accomplished the same thing when they tried to corner the silver market under Carter. Carter got the blame for the failed economy, but it was those &quot;that&#039;s business&quot; men that caused it all.

I believe that the Chinese have it right.  When a capitalist business decision affects and hurts the rest of the economy and the Chinese reputation, it is a Capital crime.  We tend to treat white collar crime as &quot;that&#039;s business&quot; with a slap on the wrist at most.  After all no one was hurt, particualrly those who lost their jobs and insurance, those businesses that closed because of expensive travel, those that could no longer buy food because it became too expensive.

Kanda, you are a wise person and probably right.  That doesn&#039;t make this any easier to swallow.  Not all morons are on the left, the right has plenty of them that don&#039;t know what is important.  I wish Allapundit would take that link and run with it.  I know Ed won&#039;t; he is a true believer.  My God, this is the reason everything has happened for the last year.  We are now chasing phantoms, when we sould be hanging wall street witches.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Kanda, thanks for the link.  I think you are probably right that readers will probably say that it&#8217;s that&#8217;s business and let it go.  However this &#8220;that&#8217;s business&#8221; caused a lot of good people to pay $4.00 a gallon for gasoline then blame Bush or the oil companies.  This &#8220;that&#8217;s business&#8221; led a lot of good people to stay at congress and protest with a <em>drill now</em>.  Now that we know that the whole thing was part of a &#8220;that&#8217;s business&#8221; scheme to get rich off the rest of us, what will happen when we really do need to <em>drill now</em>?  This little bout of avarice is a cry wolf that will hurt even worse next time.  You know, those scurrlious b&#8230;&#8230;., the Hunt brothers accomplished the same thing when they tried to corner the silver market under Carter. Carter got the blame for the failed economy, but it was those &#8220;that&#8217;s business&#8221; men that caused it all.</p>
<p>I believe that the Chinese have it right.  When a capitalist business decision affects and hurts the rest of the economy and the Chinese reputation, it is a Capital crime.  We tend to treat white collar crime as &#8220;that&#8217;s business&#8221; with a slap on the wrist at most.  After all no one was hurt, particualrly those who lost their jobs and insurance, those businesses that closed because of expensive travel, those that could no longer buy food because it became too expensive.</p>
<p>Kanda, you are a wise person and probably right.  That doesn&#8217;t make this any easier to swallow.  Not all morons are on the left, the right has plenty of them that don&#8217;t know what is important.  I wish Allapundit would take that link and run with it.  I know Ed won&#8217;t; he is a true believer.  My God, this is the reason everything has happened for the last year.  We are now chasing phantoms, when we sould be hanging wall street witches.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: OwlorNothing</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/03/16/the-bailout-backlash-problem/comment-page-2/#comment-1988215</link>
		<dc:creator>OwlorNothing</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Mar 2009 20:40:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=46912#comment-1988215</guid>
		<description>Pastor Jon, there is no excuse for using even .25 of MY MONEY to give to bail out this failing business. 

There are no strings attached. The government of the USA gave away billions for NOTHING, and the people that got the money can do whatever they want with it. 

And the more Obama acts like he&#039;s upset, the stupider he looks.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Pastor Jon, there is no excuse for using even .25 of MY MONEY to give to bail out this failing business. </p>
<p>There are no strings attached. The government of the USA gave away billions for NOTHING, and the people that got the money can do whatever they want with it. </p>
<p>And the more Obama acts like he&#8217;s upset, the stupider he looks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kanda</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/03/16/the-bailout-backlash-problem/comment-page-2/#comment-1988211</link>
		<dc:creator>kanda</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Mar 2009 20:39:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=46912#comment-1988211</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;Isn’t this yet another point in favor of forcing these companies through bankruptcy? I’m not sure of how the contracts are structured, and I’m not sure that it matters, but at least the payments made would be heavily scrutinized in terms of who gets paid, when they get paid, and the amount they get paid.

Millions in payments to employees and Billions in payments to foreign banks. Again, what was the justification for bailing out AIG?

Neo-con Artist on March 16, 2009 at 3:00 PM&lt;/blockquote&gt;

You make good points. Sadly I think after the US finally stops bailing AIG out, AIG will still going go bankrupt to get out of paying us back the money the government gave them. What a pickle we are in. Are we in for a penny in for a pound or do we just flush it and call it a day?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Isn’t this yet another point in favor of forcing these companies through bankruptcy? I’m not sure of how the contracts are structured, and I’m not sure that it matters, but at least the payments made would be heavily scrutinized in terms of who gets paid, when they get paid, and the amount they get paid.</p>
<p>Millions in payments to employees and Billions in payments to foreign banks. Again, what was the justification for bailing out AIG?</p>
<p>Neo-con Artist on March 16, 2009 at 3:00 PM</p></blockquote>
<p>You make good points. Sadly I think after the US finally stops bailing AIG out, AIG will still going go bankrupt to get out of paying us back the money the government gave them. What a pickle we are in. Are we in for a penny in for a pound or do we just flush it and call it a day?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kanda</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/03/16/the-bailout-backlash-problem/comment-page-2/#comment-1988115</link>
		<dc:creator>kanda</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Mar 2009 20:23:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=46912#comment-1988115</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;Out of the 8 million people in New York City, a little over 41,000 of them pay 50% of the taxes collected by the city. I’m willing to bet that a huge portion of the AIG people getting bonuses live/work in New York City. Is anybody caring what it would do to New York’s budget if that money was not paid out and thus available to tax? 

They want to tax the rich more so they can pay for their programs, but then they also want to stop the rich from getting paid? 

&lt;strong&gt;And as I pointed out in another comment, this outrage is like being mad at a friend for using 25 cents to buy a gumball after you loaned him $250.&lt;/strong&gt;

&lt;em&gt;Here’s when people are going to wake up to the futility of this class warfare: When their boss comes to them and says “I’m sorry, my taxes are going up so to keep this company’s profit level up, I’m going to have to let you go . . .”&lt;/em&gt;
PastorJon on March 16, 2009 at 3:55 PM&lt;/blockquote&gt;

It&#039;s a bad analogy Pastor Jon. I didn&#039;t loan AIG anything. That company was failing. The Government decided to provide AIG with billions of dollars actually $160 Billion and still climbing in an attempt to save AIG from collapse. The company decided it should pay something like $165 million in bonus money to its empolyees. Where does the government get the vast majority of that money? Of course some will say loans. Well someone has to pay back the government loans and that someone is us, the US Taxpayer. The government should have written the bailout to preclude the bonus payments period or let the company go bankrupt. On any level the taxes paid on the $165 million pale by comparison to what it is costing the rest of us.

You call this class warfare? Who is kidding whom? Some corporate fat cats are ripping us off and laughing all the way to the bank. Should we be bitter about it. You betcha. They destroyed jobs and lives and our wealth. What about them you ask? That&#039;s who they are paying out the bonuses too. I&#039;ll tell you one thing if the big guys didn&#039;t get their bonus they would not pay it to anyone else. You can bet after they lay off the workers they still pay themselves a bonus. It&#039;s a ripoff even may be a crime. NYS Attorney General Andrew Cuomo is going after AIG this afternoon. I hope he puts them all in jail. We&#039;ll see who gets the last laugh.
It not class warfare. Those companies stole from me and you and the rest of us. It&#039;s justice we want...no It&#039;s justice we demand!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Out of the 8 million people in New York City, a little over 41,000 of them pay 50% of the taxes collected by the city. I’m willing to bet that a huge portion of the AIG people getting bonuses live/work in New York City. Is anybody caring what it would do to New York’s budget if that money was not paid out and thus available to tax? </p>
<p>They want to tax the rich more so they can pay for their programs, but then they also want to stop the rich from getting paid? </p>
<p><strong>And as I pointed out in another comment, this outrage is like being mad at a friend for using 25 cents to buy a gumball after you loaned him $250.</strong></p>
<p><em>Here’s when people are going to wake up to the futility of this class warfare: When their boss comes to them and says “I’m sorry, my taxes are going up so to keep this company’s profit level up, I’m going to have to let you go . . .”</em><br />
PastorJon on March 16, 2009 at 3:55 PM</p></blockquote>
<p>It&#8217;s a bad analogy Pastor Jon. I didn&#8217;t loan AIG anything. That company was failing. The Government decided to provide AIG with billions of dollars actually $160 Billion and still climbing in an attempt to save AIG from collapse. The company decided it should pay something like $165 million in bonus money to its empolyees. Where does the government get the vast majority of that money? Of course some will say loans. Well someone has to pay back the government loans and that someone is us, the US Taxpayer. The government should have written the bailout to preclude the bonus payments period or let the company go bankrupt. On any level the taxes paid on the $165 million pale by comparison to what it is costing the rest of us.</p>
<p>You call this class warfare? Who is kidding whom? Some corporate fat cats are ripping us off and laughing all the way to the bank. Should we be bitter about it. You betcha. They destroyed jobs and lives and our wealth. What about them you ask? That&#8217;s who they are paying out the bonuses too. I&#8217;ll tell you one thing if the big guys didn&#8217;t get their bonus they would not pay it to anyone else. You can bet after they lay off the workers they still pay themselves a bonus. It&#8217;s a ripoff even may be a crime. NYS Attorney General Andrew Cuomo is going after AIG this afternoon. I hope he puts them all in jail. We&#8217;ll see who gets the last laugh.<br />
It not class warfare. Those companies stole from me and you and the rest of us. It&#8217;s justice we want&#8230;no It&#8217;s justice we demand!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: (O)ne (B)ig (A)wful (M)istake (A)merica - White House now on alert and getting worried about bailout backlash &#124; Fire Andrea Mitchell!</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/03/16/the-bailout-backlash-problem/comment-page-2/#comment-1988103</link>
		<dc:creator>(O)ne (B)ig (A)wful (M)istake (A)merica - White House now on alert and getting worried about bailout backlash &#124; Fire Andrea Mitchell!</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Mar 2009 20:21:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=46912#comment-1988103</guid>
		<description>[...] media can try and ignore it. The L.A. Times can ignore a 15,000 person protest in Fullerton, but The White House is starting to get worried about a populist backlash against bailout-mania. I would suggest reading this Michelle Malkin article and checking out all [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] media can try and ignore it. The L.A. Times can ignore a 15,000 person protest in Fullerton, but The White House is starting to get worried about a populist backlash against bailout-mania. I would suggest reading this Michelle Malkin article and checking out all [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: PastorJon</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/03/16/the-bailout-backlash-problem/comment-page-2/#comment-1987935</link>
		<dc:creator>PastorJon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Mar 2009 19:55:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=46912#comment-1987935</guid>
		<description>Out of the 8 million people in New York City, a little over 41,000 of them pay 50% of the taxes collected by the city. I&#039;m willing to bet that a huge portion of the AIG people getting bonuses live/work in New York City. Is anybody caring what it would do to New York&#039;s budget if that money was not paid out and thus available to tax? 

They want to tax the rich more so they can pay for their programs, but then they also want to stop the rich from getting paid? 

And as I pointed out in another comment, this outrage is like being mad at a friend for using 25 cents to buy a gumball after you loaned him $250.

Here&#039;s when people are going to wake up to the futility of this class warfare: When their boss comes to them and says &quot;I&#039;m sorry, my taxes are going up so to keep this company&#039;s profit level up, I&#039;m going to have to let you go . . .&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Out of the 8 million people in New York City, a little over 41,000 of them pay 50% of the taxes collected by the city. I&#8217;m willing to bet that a huge portion of the AIG people getting bonuses live/work in New York City. Is anybody caring what it would do to New York&#8217;s budget if that money was not paid out and thus available to tax? </p>
<p>They want to tax the rich more so they can pay for their programs, but then they also want to stop the rich from getting paid? </p>
<p>And as I pointed out in another comment, this outrage is like being mad at a friend for using 25 cents to buy a gumball after you loaned him $250.</p>
<p>Here&#8217;s when people are going to wake up to the futility of this class warfare: When their boss comes to them and says &#8220;I&#8217;m sorry, my taxes are going up so to keep this company&#8217;s profit level up, I&#8217;m going to have to let you go . . .&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Video: Obama outrageously outraged by AIG outrage — But As For Me</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/03/16/the-bailout-backlash-problem/comment-page-2/#comment-1987867</link>
		<dc:creator>Video: Obama outrageously outraged by AIG outrage — But As For Me</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Mar 2009 19:41:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=46912#comment-1987867</guid>
		<description>[...] which The One attempts to douse a populist brushfire with a little heat of his own.  [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] which The One attempts to douse a populist brushfire with a little heat of his own.  [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hot Air &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Video: Obama outrageously outraged by AIG outrage</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/03/16/the-bailout-backlash-problem/comment-page-2/#comment-1987766</link>
		<dc:creator>Hot Air &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Video: Obama outrageously outraged by AIG outrage</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Mar 2009 19:20:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=46912#comment-1987766</guid>
		<description>[...] which The One attempts to douse a populist brushfire with a little heat of his own. Two issues here: Can the feds legally force AIG to break their [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] which The One attempts to douse a populist brushfire with a little heat of his own. Two issues here: Can the feds legally force AIG to break their [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Neo-con Artist</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/03/16/the-bailout-backlash-problem/comment-page-2/#comment-1987694</link>
		<dc:creator>Neo-con Artist</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Mar 2009 19:00:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=46912#comment-1987694</guid>
		<description>Isn&#039;t this yet another point in favor of forcing these companies through bankruptcy?  I&#039;m not sure of how the contracts are structured, and I&#039;m not sure that it matters, but at least the payments made would be heavily scrutinized in terms of who gets paid, when they get paid, and the amount they get paid.


Millions in payments to employees and Billions in payments to foreign banks. Again, what was the justification for bailing out AIG?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Isn&#8217;t this yet another point in favor of forcing these companies through bankruptcy?  I&#8217;m not sure of how the contracts are structured, and I&#8217;m not sure that it matters, but at least the payments made would be heavily scrutinized in terms of who gets paid, when they get paid, and the amount they get paid.</p>
<p>Millions in payments to employees and Billions in payments to foreign banks. Again, what was the justification for bailing out AIG?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kanda</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/03/16/the-bailout-backlash-problem/comment-page-2/#comment-1987478</link>
		<dc:creator>kanda</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Mar 2009 18:06:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=46912#comment-1987478</guid>
		<description>My guess is the readers hear will basically say that&#039;s business. I doubt they will care unless they themselves lost money on the deal. Color me cynical.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My guess is the readers hear will basically say that&#8217;s business. I doubt they will care unless they themselves lost money on the deal. Color me cynical.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bailout Backlash ? &#124; Citizen-Right</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/03/16/the-bailout-backlash-problem/comment-page-2/#comment-1987464</link>
		<dc:creator>Bailout Backlash ? &#124; Citizen-Right</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Mar 2009 18:03:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=46912#comment-1987464</guid>
		<description>[...] Read Full Post &#8211;&gt; [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Read Full Post &#8211;&gt; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kanda</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/03/16/the-bailout-backlash-problem/comment-page-2/#comment-1987462</link>
		<dc:creator>kanda</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Mar 2009 18:02:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=46912#comment-1987462</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;I do wish that some industrious soul would take the link I gave on the oil speculation and make it work. You may have to go back to the original Steve Forbes or KOTV poating. I think the posters here will go postal when they read it.

Old Country Boy on March 16, 2009 at 1:40 PM&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Glad to oblige.



&lt;a href=&quot;http://newson6.com/global/story.asp?s=10007463&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Here is the link read it folks&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>I do wish that some industrious soul would take the link I gave on the oil speculation and make it work. You may have to go back to the original Steve Forbes or KOTV poating. I think the posters here will go postal when they read it.</p>
<p>Old Country Boy on March 16, 2009 at 1:40 PM</p></blockquote>
<p>Glad to oblige.</p>
<p><a href="http://newson6.com/global/story.asp?s=10007463" rel="nofollow">Here is the link read it folks</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DaveL</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/03/16/the-bailout-backlash-problem/comment-page-2/#comment-1987445</link>
		<dc:creator>DaveL</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Mar 2009 17:53:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=46912#comment-1987445</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;A central question for Mr. Obama is whether his cool style — “in a time of crisis, we cannot afford to govern out of anger,” he said in his address to Congress last month — will prove effective when the country may be feeling more emotional.
&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Uhhhhhh, does this mean that Mr. Nagourney is suggesting that America voted for Mr. &quot;Cool Style&quot; out of a sense of rationalism?  Only now that people are beginning to pay attention to the agenda behind the paparazzi Wizard-of-Oz curtain they are &quot;feeling more emotional&quot;??????

Unreal.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>A central question for Mr. Obama is whether his cool style — “in a time of crisis, we cannot afford to govern out of anger,” he said in his address to Congress last month — will prove effective when the country may be feeling more emotional.
</p></blockquote>
<p>Uhhhhhh, does this mean that Mr. Nagourney is suggesting that America voted for Mr. &#8220;Cool Style&#8221; out of a sense of rationalism?  Only now that people are beginning to pay attention to the agenda behind the paparazzi Wizard-of-Oz curtain they are &#8220;feeling more emotional&#8221;??????</p>
<p>Unreal.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Old Country Boy</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/03/16/the-bailout-backlash-problem/comment-page-2/#comment-1987405</link>
		<dc:creator>Old Country Boy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Mar 2009 17:40:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=46912#comment-1987405</guid>
		<description>I do wish that some industrious soul would take the link I gave on the oil speculation and make it work.  You may have to go back to the original Steve Forbes or KOTV poating.  I think the posters here will go postal when they read it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I do wish that some industrious soul would take the link I gave on the oil speculation and make it work.  You may have to go back to the original Steve Forbes or KOTV poating.  I think the posters here will go postal when they read it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kanda</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/03/16/the-bailout-backlash-problem/comment-page-2/#comment-1987378</link>
		<dc:creator>kanda</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Mar 2009 17:32:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=46912#comment-1987378</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;You know folks, most you haven’t got a clue about social security. In the 55 years I have worked, at a 5% interest rate and with my employer’s and at times my own, matching payments, I have contributed almost $600,000 to the government retirement safety net and medical programs. Actuarialy, if the old country girl doesn’t shoot me first, I could live another 20 years. If I saved the money in CDs instead of sending it to the redistributionists, I could be bringing home more than 150% - 200% of what the government is distributing to me, and when I croak, the Old Girl and kids would have $600K. My dad never got a penny, my sister got one year, my mother got 2 years. 

I, by the way, I did without some things I would have liked to have and saved other funds that exceed what ss sends to me. I know I could be a good guy and give my ss to you, but f… you. I paid it, I earned it. If you want to go after somebody, go after the lawyers who are getting the grifters and undeserving the disability payments. Go after those politicians who give our contributions to others for votes. I can see how other senior citizens could be upset if their ss was eliminated or reduced.

Old Country Boy on March 16, 2009 at 12:41 PM&lt;/blockquote&gt;

I agree they have no clue. These folks care only about numero uno. To them hardship is no cable TV for 4 hours or the internet is down. In fact I think the reason they are so indifferent to anything not related to themselves is most of them are spoiled rotten. It&#039;s all I, I ,I ME, ME, ME, screw everyone else. We give many of them educations and advanced degrees and they come out of college like little robots....me me I I. I&#039;m not impressed at all. We were wrong. We should have let them struggle like we did to earn our way. They are hollow in spirit and shortsighted in actions. We were the ones who sacrificed and slaved for them. We are the ones getting screwed...by them. Talk about a generation gap. We of our generation were all fools who believed in a better life for our kids. Now we watch them destroy themselves and everything we stood for in the pursuit of material wealth. They have no clue who built this thing we call the USA or why and could care less what happens to it. They cry woe is me I&#039;ve lost on stocks and bonds after 25 years of straight growth. They will throw us under the bus to enrich themselves. Now they want to take our SS and because they want to get a return but not make the investment. Nothing is free no matter what you were led to believe young folks. Sadly it looks like you&#039;ll get your wish and America will pass into history as a fond memory of what might have been until greed destroyed it all.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>You know folks, most you haven’t got a clue about social security. In the 55 years I have worked, at a 5% interest rate and with my employer’s and at times my own, matching payments, I have contributed almost $600,000 to the government retirement safety net and medical programs. Actuarialy, if the old country girl doesn’t shoot me first, I could live another 20 years. If I saved the money in CDs instead of sending it to the redistributionists, I could be bringing home more than 150% &#8211; 200% of what the government is distributing to me, and when I croak, the Old Girl and kids would have $600K. My dad never got a penny, my sister got one year, my mother got 2 years. </p>
<p>I, by the way, I did without some things I would have liked to have and saved other funds that exceed what ss sends to me. I know I could be a good guy and give my ss to you, but f… you. I paid it, I earned it. If you want to go after somebody, go after the lawyers who are getting the grifters and undeserving the disability payments. Go after those politicians who give our contributions to others for votes. I can see how other senior citizens could be upset if their ss was eliminated or reduced.</p>
<p>Old Country Boy on March 16, 2009 at 12:41 PM</p></blockquote>
<p>I agree they have no clue. These folks care only about numero uno. To them hardship is no cable TV for 4 hours or the internet is down. In fact I think the reason they are so indifferent to anything not related to themselves is most of them are spoiled rotten. It&#8217;s all I, I ,I ME, ME, ME, screw everyone else. We give many of them educations and advanced degrees and they come out of college like little robots&#8230;.me me I I. I&#8217;m not impressed at all. We were wrong. We should have let them struggle like we did to earn our way. They are hollow in spirit and shortsighted in actions. We were the ones who sacrificed and slaved for them. We are the ones getting screwed&#8230;by them. Talk about a generation gap. We of our generation were all fools who believed in a better life for our kids. Now we watch them destroy themselves and everything we stood for in the pursuit of material wealth. They have no clue who built this thing we call the USA or why and could care less what happens to it. They cry woe is me I&#8217;ve lost on stocks and bonds after 25 years of straight growth. They will throw us under the bus to enrich themselves. Now they want to take our SS and because they want to get a return but not make the investment. Nothing is free no matter what you were led to believe young folks. Sadly it looks like you&#8217;ll get your wish and America will pass into history as a fond memory of what might have been until greed destroyed it all.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: anniekc</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/03/16/the-bailout-backlash-problem/comment-page-2/#comment-1987373</link>
		<dc:creator>anniekc</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Mar 2009 17:31:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=46912#comment-1987373</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;Aren’t they being set up for failure under those restrictions?

smellthecoffee on March 16, 2009 at 1:27 PM&lt;/blockquote&gt;


Yes, yes, and oh yeah, yes.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Aren’t they being set up for failure under those restrictions?</p>
<p>smellthecoffee on March 16, 2009 at 1:27 PM</p></blockquote>
<p>Yes, yes, and oh yeah, yes.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Christian Conservative</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/03/16/the-bailout-backlash-problem/comment-page-2/#comment-1987369</link>
		<dc:creator>Christian Conservative</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Mar 2009 17:30:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=46912#comment-1987369</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;I am angry at AIG and the politicians. More so the politicians (Barney Frank, Chris Dodd, Maxine Waters, etc.) who allowed this whole thing to get out of control. I know AIG is a business, but it has now received a bailout and should have a little bit of shame about paying out big bonuses after getting tax payers money.

jcheney on March 16, 2009 at 12:48 PM&lt;/blockquote&gt;

The bonuses are contractual.  They can&#039;t be rescinded without lawsuits.  So other than that, I agree completely with the above quote which amounts to:

I am angry at the politicians. More so the politicians (Barney Frank, Chris Dodd, Maxine Waters, etc.) who allowed this whole thing to get out of control.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>I am angry at AIG and the politicians. More so the politicians (Barney Frank, Chris Dodd, Maxine Waters, etc.) who allowed this whole thing to get out of control. I know AIG is a business, but it has now received a bailout and should have a little bit of shame about paying out big bonuses after getting tax payers money.</p>
<p>jcheney on March 16, 2009 at 12:48 PM</p></blockquote>
<p>The bonuses are contractual.  They can&#8217;t be rescinded without lawsuits.  So other than that, I agree completely with the above quote which amounts to:</p>
<p>I am angry at the politicians. More so the politicians (Barney Frank, Chris Dodd, Maxine Waters, etc.) who allowed this whole thing to get out of control.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: OBQuiet</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/03/16/the-bailout-backlash-problem/comment-page-2/#comment-1987367</link>
		<dc:creator>OBQuiet</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Mar 2009 17:30:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=46912#comment-1987367</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;The Obama administration is increasingly concerned about a populist backlash against banks and Wall Street, worried that anger at financial institutions could also end up being directed at Congress and the White House and could complicate President Obama’s agenda.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

It isn&#039;t the banks and Wall St that I have anger towards. My anger is directed at those in government who didn&#039;t let the market punish the banks and Wall St by letting them fail.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>The Obama administration is increasingly concerned about a populist backlash against banks and Wall Street, worried that anger at financial institutions could also end up being directed at Congress and the White House and could complicate President Obama’s agenda.</p></blockquote>
<p>It isn&#8217;t the banks and Wall St that I have anger towards. My anger is directed at those in government who didn&#8217;t let the market punish the banks and Wall St by letting them fail.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: smellthecoffee</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/03/16/the-bailout-backlash-problem/comment-page-2/#comment-1987361</link>
		<dc:creator>smellthecoffee</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Mar 2009 17:27:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=46912#comment-1987361</guid>
		<description>About these bonuses for the execs. . . To ask the question in the form of an analogy:

If the gov bailed out the Omni Hotel chain (or any other top flight hotel chain), would the gov then say, Now that we&#039;ve bailed you out, you can no longer 

*Have real plants in the lobby (fire your garden/plant person).
*Put chocolates, roses, etc. on the pillows.
*Offer complimentary breakfasts, drinks, happy hour discounts.
*Use bellhops.  Luggage carts will be provided.
*Have an exercise facility.
*Have a swimming pool.

Etc.  The government would be asking them to cut back to a Econolodge kind of hotel.  If they cut back to that extent, then they are no longer a luxury hotel, and can no longer compete for that clientele.  Call chocolates on the pillow extravagant, but hey, if that&#039;s what business at that level looks like, then they need to be able to do it.  If mongo bonuses for execs is what doing business at the level of AIG &lt;strong&gt;&lt;em&gt;and its competition&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/strong&gt; looks like, then how will AIG stay competitive if they can&#039;t match them?  Aren&#039;t they being set up for failure under those restrictions?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>About these bonuses for the execs. . . To ask the question in the form of an analogy:</p>
<p>If the gov bailed out the Omni Hotel chain (or any other top flight hotel chain), would the gov then say, Now that we&#8217;ve bailed you out, you can no longer </p>
<p>*Have real plants in the lobby (fire your garden/plant person).<br />
*Put chocolates, roses, etc. on the pillows.<br />
*Offer complimentary breakfasts, drinks, happy hour discounts.<br />
*Use bellhops.  Luggage carts will be provided.<br />
*Have an exercise facility.<br />
*Have a swimming pool.</p>
<p>Etc.  The government would be asking them to cut back to a Econolodge kind of hotel.  If they cut back to that extent, then they are no longer a luxury hotel, and can no longer compete for that clientele.  Call chocolates on the pillow extravagant, but hey, if that&#8217;s what business at that level looks like, then they need to be able to do it.  If mongo bonuses for execs is what doing business at the level of AIG <strong><em>and its competition</em></strong> looks like, then how will AIG stay competitive if they can&#8217;t match them?  Aren&#8217;t they being set up for failure under those restrictions?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Knucklehead</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/03/16/the-bailout-backlash-problem/comment-page-1/#comment-1987332</link>
		<dc:creator>Knucklehead</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Mar 2009 17:20:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=46912#comment-1987332</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;Don’t worry, Obama has a boogey man waiting in the wings:
from pg. 5 of his budget

While middle-class families have been playing
by the rules, living up to their responsibilities as
neighbors and citizens, those at the commanding
heights of our economy have not.
Enter the evil high earner.

ctmom on March 16, 2009 at 11:49 AM
&lt;/blockquote&gt;

This quote from page 5 of the budget should be quote of the day.  Anyone see Fox News Sunday/Chris Wallace yesterday?  He was pounding Austan Goolsbee about it and Bob Corker did a nice job of making his points about how bad this budget is.

Barney Frank wanted to defend himself against Corker and Chris Wallace asked him if he really wanted to have a food fight.  

It was great, anyone have a video?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Don’t worry, Obama has a boogey man waiting in the wings:<br />
from pg. 5 of his budget</p>
<p>While middle-class families have been playing<br />
by the rules, living up to their responsibilities as<br />
neighbors and citizens, those at the commanding<br />
heights of our economy have not.<br />
Enter the evil high earner.</p>
<p>ctmom on March 16, 2009 at 11:49 AM
</p></blockquote>
<p>This quote from page 5 of the budget should be quote of the day.  Anyone see Fox News Sunday/Chris Wallace yesterday?  He was pounding Austan Goolsbee about it and Bob Corker did a nice job of making his points about how bad this budget is.</p>
<p>Barney Frank wanted to defend himself against Corker and Chris Wallace asked him if he really wanted to have a food fight.  </p>
<p>It was great, anyone have a video?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: thomasaur</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/03/16/the-bailout-backlash-problem/comment-page-1/#comment-1987312</link>
		<dc:creator>thomasaur</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Mar 2009 17:14:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=46912#comment-1987312</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;Old Country Boy on March 16, 2009 at 1:06 PM

&lt;/blockquote&gt;If they pointed that out to the ignorant consumers they would lose the &quot;Big Oil&quot; boogeyman.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Old Country Boy on March 16, 2009 at 1:06 PM</p>
</blockquote>
<p>If they pointed that out to the ignorant consumers they would lose the &#8220;Big Oil&#8221; boogeyman.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
