Star power: Palin to keynote big congressional GOP fundraiser
posted at 4:56 pm on March 16, 2009 by Allahpundit
Says NBC, “If there was any doubt whom the Republican Party sees as its biggest fundraiser in the post-Bush era, this news should probably end it.” They needed something strong to help wash the taste of Michael Steele’s blunders out of the base’s mouth, and this is about as strong as it gets.
Looks like Gov. Sarah Palin will continue to have a future as a Republican fundraiser. Palin will deliver the keynote address at the June 8 Senate-House Dinner in Washington, D.C. The annual dinner is a fundraiser for the Republican Party’s congressional re-election efforts.
Here’s a statement from the chairman of the National Republican Senatorial Committee, Sen. John Cornyn, R-Texas:
“Governor Palin has quickly emerged as one of the most popular and recognizable faces in the Republican Party, and we are honored to have her deliver the keynote address at the Senate-House dinner. As a proven leader in her home state of Alaska, Gov. Palin represents a breath of fresh air from the business-as-usual crowd in Washington, and is one of our party’s up-and-coming young governors who will play a critical role in our re-building efforts in the years to come. Last fall, she electrified and energized crowds across the country, and we expect she will generate a similar amount of enthusiasm at this spring’s dinner.”
A lot of powerful people will owe her favors come 2012 if the fundraising’s strong. Question: Given her popularity and money potential with grassroots conservatives, how come Palin’s name wasn’t floated for RNC chair last year? Granted, she’s busy running Alaska, but so what? Mel Martinez was busy with the Senate when he became chair in 2007. The answer then was to give him a co-chair who could handle day to day operations while Martinez served as a public face and fundraiser for the Committee. Palin would probably do gangbusters business in the same capacity. I can only assume she was reluctant to consider it this time around because it would look unseemly to divide her attention while Alaska deals with the recession, but if she’s reelected next year and the economy comes back, she’d be a dynamite prospect to succeed Steele in 2010.
Update: Another benefit to being chair, needless to say, is forming relationships with party movers and shakers at the state level, a useful thing to have for someone planning a national run down the road.










Blowback
Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.
Trackbacks/Pings
Trackback URL
Comments
Comment pages: 1 2 3 4 Next »
hehe…Allah must hurt to know that Palin is still the powerhouse! Are you Parker and Frum going to get together for a hug?
PierreLegrand on March 16, 2009 at 4:58 PM
I’m sending a money order for a quarter to Michael Steele who just sent me a survey and a copy of the 500 buck money order for SarahPac…..
sven10077 on March 16, 2009 at 4:59 PM
Thats the best news I’ve heard today!!
canopfor on March 16, 2009 at 5:00 PM
Too small and (comparatively) insignificant a position, given the far loftier one she’ll be taking on in ’12.
Kent18 on March 16, 2009 at 5:00 PM
She’s still solid 2012 potential, and putting her in the RNC chair will not only wear out her novelty, but it will prevent her adding more meat to her resume.
MadisonConservative on March 16, 2009 at 5:01 PM
Why no RNC chair?
Because future Presidential contenders don’t spend 2 years tying themselves to a Congress with an approval rating of 27%.
Jack M. on March 16, 2009 at 5:01 PM
And you probably have a fat ass too, AP. :|
Patrick S on March 16, 2009 at 5:03 PM
She’s not running in 2012. Being RNC chair for two years would be a great way to keep up national exposure and make friends with the state pols she’ll need for a future run.
Allahpundit on March 16, 2009 at 5:03 PM
Until Steele is gone as RNC Chair; I am donating every dime to SarahPAC instead.
Norwegian on March 16, 2009 at 5:04 PM
Finally the idiots in Capitol Hill realize the star power and importance of Sarah Palin to the party.
I will bet that the money Sarah PAC brings in will embarrass the RNC. We’ll see by the end of this month or the start of next month when the PAC reports its finances.
Sarah brings in the people and the grassroots. I don’t see anyone else in the republican party doing that.
jencab on March 16, 2009 at 5:04 PM
There’s nowhere to go but up and she’ll get the credit when it happens.
Allahpundit on March 16, 2009 at 5:04 PM
Sarah!! 2012 can’t get here fast enough!
AubieJon on March 16, 2009 at 5:04 PM
Just don’t let any of Sen. McCain’s staff get any where near her or her speech writers………..
Seven Percent Solution on March 16, 2009 at 5:05 PM
Yeah, and Mark Sanford is? Whatever you’re smoking Allah, I want some.
Norwegian on March 16, 2009 at 5:05 PM
She’s not running – Yet!
AubieJon on March 16, 2009 at 5:05 PM
Good for GOP $$$.
Not so good for getting votes from the center, where elections are won.
Tinian on March 16, 2009 at 5:06 PM
riiiight
if she doesn’t run in 2012, I believe that being a governor for a second term is more important than being the chair of the RNC
plus, it give her more time to lobby for future stimulus packages
joey24007 on March 16, 2009 at 5:06 PM
Not sure I buy that quite yet.
Esthier on March 16, 2009 at 5:06 PM
The exasct same argument, of course, applies no less to Mitt. Let him do it, then; Sarah has a date with destiny. ;)
Kent18 on March 16, 2009 at 5:06 PM
If that were the case, why has only one RNC chair become president in the last century and a half? Why didn’t those connections help the rest?
MadisonConservative on March 16, 2009 at 5:06 PM
Obama/Palin 2012 !!!! DEM Ticket!
TimeTraveler on March 16, 2009 at 5:06 PM
SUCCEED STEELE IN 2010 MY A$$!!
SOMETHING BETTER HAPPEN BEFORE THEN!!
DamnYankee on March 16, 2009 at 5:07 PM
is it 2012 yet….
id like to see Sarah becoming more involved…as she takes her steps towards the Presidency…however…the RNC is merely using her for publicity…like everyone else…plus they are propably just mad that SarahPAC is making them broke…
alexraye on March 16, 2009 at 5:07 PM
Focus on 2010 or there will be no 2012.
jeff_from_mpls on March 16, 2009 at 5:08 PM
You took the term “smoking some good sh!t” literally, didn’t you?
AubieJon on March 16, 2009 at 5:09 PM
DID ALLAH JUST COMPLIMENT THE CUDA!!!!
excuse me while i collect my jaw from the floor….
alexraye on March 16, 2009 at 5:09 PM
Do not underestimate the powers of Pelosi or suffer David Brook’s fate you will.
MadisonConservative on March 16, 2009 at 5:09 PM
She’s not running in 2012. I’ll bet you.
Allahpundit on March 16, 2009 at 5:09 PM
Thanks Allah, the Palin threads bring out the trolls…
HornetSting on March 16, 2009 at 5:11 PM
I agree Palin won’t run in 2012. The wounds are still too fresh. By staying relevant and shoring up her weaknesses (e.g., the public’s misimpression that she’s a foreign policy lightweight), she still has a chance down the road.
A financial wiz will fit the bill for what ails us though, so I’m putting my early money on Romney.
Blacksheep on March 16, 2009 at 5:11 PM
I likes me some Palin…
AP, got any stock tips?
Gohawgs on March 16, 2009 at 5:11 PM
AP even though you tried to bury the results of the poll you conducted last week to the question
Who is the leader of the Republican Party?
in which 38% of over 9700 respondents chose Governor Palin as the current leader of the party and their number one choice many Republicans made note of that poll as well as other polls that show that Sarah is number one in the hearts and minds of conservatives.
By the way Sarah’s funding arm SarahPAC is going gangbusters. AP, thanks for posting the Meghan McCain thread; it has caused many of her contributors to donate to SarahPAC again and again and again.
technopeasant on March 16, 2009 at 5:13 PM
She is so running in 2012. She’s got the PAC, the grassroot support, she is attending big time events, she still has star power, and Obama’s numbers are going down the rat hole.
jencab on March 16, 2009 at 5:13 PM
I hope you’re right. She needs distance from ’08, and she needs to come back fully prepared. That will take some time. The cramming didn’t work well enough.
Esthier on March 16, 2009 at 5:13 PM
That’s not bad advise. Certainly 2016 would be much easier for her to run than in 2012. She has all these bad news cycles haunting her constantly. Let’s not forget the fact that she needs a lot of time to review massive amounts of policy to prepare her for the presidency.
Hopefully Palin’s star power won’t fade away in the next 8 years.
TimeTraveler on March 16, 2009 at 5:14 PM
Because it’s a waste of time and her talents.
Correct Joey, if she does run though she will be the clear favorite once the GOP sees how much cash she raises and how many favors will have to be repaid.
davek70 on March 16, 2009 at 5:14 PM
I want to see how her PAC is doing in relation to the other big Elephants like Mitt’s.
I’m in her corner – so hopefully she’s smacking them down.
HondaV65 on March 16, 2009 at 5:14 PM
Allahpundit:
If you were sitting with $100m in the bank, would you bow out from running for President in 2012?
The answer is obvious.
technopeasant on March 16, 2009 at 5:15 PM
Exactly.
Allahpundit on March 16, 2009 at 5:15 PM
Palin/McCain (Meghan) in 2016!
lorien1973 on March 16, 2009 at 5:16 PM
Noted for posterity.
MadisonConservative on March 16, 2009 at 5:16 PM
Alaska is probably one the least affected by the recession. Back in November, they were the only state in the Union whose economy expanded.
Mark Sanford’s South Carolina: Second highest unemployment in the nation (Only Michigan is higher)
Bobby Jindal’s Louisina: Every metro area is officially in recession
And so on and so forth. If any potential 2012 GOP contender has “deal with the recession”; it applies more to Sarah’s potential competitors than her.
Norwegian on March 16, 2009 at 5:16 PM
I agree…she will be governor, or accept a cabinet position if a Republican wins.
right2bright on March 16, 2009 at 5:16 PM
Allah, one of Palin’s “political assets” is her “outsider” creds. The minute she becomes RNC Chair, she loses that. So she would assume the negatives of being tied to the GOP in Congress (with very little upside) at the cost of one of her biggest selling points.
Besides, as Obumble’s term carries on, she looks better and better in hindsight. Why risk being tarnished further while the opposition is helping build you back up?
Jack M. on March 16, 2009 at 5:16 PM
I don’t think the GOP will nominate a conservative. We’ll end up with another uncharismatic milquetoast loser; either Huckabee (and he’ll be seen as the lesser evil) or Specter (or a McCain/Specter wannabe)The GOP is not going to be serious until the country has hit rockbottom so we’ll keep nominating middle ground losers that nobody likes.
austinnelly on March 16, 2009 at 5:17 PM
Or it shows she knows how to keep us out of one…
right2bright on March 16, 2009 at 5:17 PM
Ugh, everyone and their Mitt Romney strokin’. Sorry, but I don’t buy that Romney is going to get anything.
A Gen-Xer will become the next President in 2012. Obama is the last of the baby boomer presidents.
Sakaki on March 16, 2009 at 5:17 PM
Please no. They would need an eighteen wheeler instead of a tour bus.
HornetSting on March 16, 2009 at 5:17 PM
I wouldn’t bet against you right now. The MSM hasn’t lost their appetite for negative stories about her, nor will they any time soon, and I’m sure they’ll continue to minimize or flat out not report her successes. She could lay golden eggs and they’d report she has reproductive problems.
Patrick S on March 16, 2009 at 5:17 PM
Agree. She won’t run in 2012.
jeanie on March 16, 2009 at 5:18 PM
Without looking it up I bet she’s kicking their butts. Palin’s got great star power and is a legitimate conservative. I wish her the best however she plays it because she got a seriously raw deal in ’08. That said, she should probably sit this one out IMO.
Blacksheep on March 16, 2009 at 5:18 PM
This news should be enough to drive Manhattan into the ocean… :~)
Jed1899 on March 16, 2009 at 5:18 PM
Why the talk of ’16?!?!!?
Do we just think obama will automatically win reelection? If he’s beaten in ’12, and not by Palin, she won’t run in ’16 against a sitting Republican.
First, 2010…Then 2012 or this country is gonna be messed up for sure.
Gohawgs on March 16, 2009 at 5:18 PM
It all depends on the eventual success of Obama.If he Carters , she’ll run.
the_nile on March 16, 2009 at 5:19 PM
The guy who couldn’t buy his way to victory in the primaries, even after pouring in an additional 42 MILLION DOLLARS of his own money in the attempt?
That “financial wiz,” you mean…?
Right. Think I’ll just stick with Sarah, all the same. ;)
Kent18 on March 16, 2009 at 5:19 PM
If the economy recovers Obama will get credit for it no matter what and ensure his 2012 reelection bid. In order for him to lose the country will probably have to go down the toilet financially.
TimeTraveler on March 16, 2009 at 5:20 PM
Ok guess I will be the one to say it. Governor Palin’s national political career was ruined by her oldest daughter. I think you guys are in denial about how weirded out the middle class soccer moms are about her having a kid and being unmarried. And yes, it would be worse if she had aborted it, but either way it is seen as not something admirable.
Speedwagon82 on March 16, 2009 at 5:21 PM
.
.
AMEN . . . That – in spades!!
Hal-9000 on March 16, 2009 at 5:21 PM
How about Palin/Fumbump 2012!
I would love it, but my wife would hate it!!!
fumpbump on March 16, 2009 at 5:22 PM
Bingo.
Kent18 on March 16, 2009 at 5:22 PM
The odds are Obama will win again in 2012, it has been awhile for a one term president.
Any problems these next four years will be blamed on Bush, and within four years we will be coming out of most any cycle. Obama will be running as the economy is in a cyclical upswing. “Don’t go back to how things were done” will be his theme…we have (or about to) turn the corner on the massive crisis the Republicans have put us in…
It would be a total breakdown of our political system for Obama to not be elected…the way it’s going that is a possibility.
right2bright on March 16, 2009 at 5:22 PM
College Grad Bristol would end those worries in 2016.
TimeTraveler on March 16, 2009 at 5:23 PM
Not running her in 2012 is the equivalent of not bringing in your closer in the top of the ninth when behind by one run.
We have to throw everything we have at Obama by 2012, because if he wins a second term, this country will be changed forever, and not for the better.
If you want to run a “sacrificial lamb” in 2012 I don’t ever want to hear from you again.
doug1981 on March 16, 2009 at 5:23 PM
THANK YOU!!! Obama is an easy guy to defeat. We had a gutless presidential candidate in McLame. He tried his “mavericky” best in not attacking Obama. “There’s nothing to be scared of.” What a dork!
Palin is great in debates and she’ll kick Obama’s ass in 2012 and make him cry to Michelle’s bulky arms.
jencab on March 16, 2009 at 5:23 PM
Yep, you hit the nail on the head.
Norwegian on March 16, 2009 at 5:23 PM
Suggested Topic:
Stable Solvent Banking and Reliable Energy for America after the Age of Obama: How Alaska Can Lead America Back to Sanity and Prosperity.
econavenger on March 16, 2009 at 5:24 PM
That is one of the craziest comments evah! I would like to take an informal poll here….
How many of you either have a family member that was pregnant out of wedlock, were yourselves pregnant out of wedlock (if you are male then got someone pregnant out of wedlock) or know someone who was pregnant out of wedlock?
I will bet that 90%+ of America will be part of the aforementioned group. If anything, it just makes Palin a normal person. She has the same problems as others in America!
fumpbump on March 16, 2009 at 5:25 PM
This is the last thing they care about when their 401(k)’s have been cut in half and government expansion is occurring at an alarming rate.
doug1981 on March 16, 2009 at 5:25 PM
David Frum’s pompous ass is probably preparing another Newsweek piece on why Palin is horrible for the GOP.
therightwinger on March 16, 2009 at 5:25 PM
I think she’s basically invulnerable to “insider” charges thanks to her background. They could sell her as the person who’s coming in from the outside to take over the party on behalf of the grassroots, which would jack up the fundraising further.
Allahpundit on March 16, 2009 at 5:25 PM
I think in a few years it will be “old story”…it will be trotted out by the dems media dogs, but the story will be played out by then.
The ones voting against he now, will have felt the sting of raising a child and understand it can happen to anyone.
right2bright on March 16, 2009 at 5:25 PM
You folks that claim Sarah has been wounded irreparably obviously know nothing about boxing. Opponents open up wounds; boxers lose and ‘lick their wounds’. But you know what-they eventually come back and fight again with their wounds all healed and better prepared for battle after they take the time to review what went wrong last time.
Like the proverbial boxer, Sarah’s wounds have healed and she will have 3 years to review her performance in 2008 and to sharpen it in the future and work on her so-called ‘weaknesses’ as you put it.
And to the ‘foreign policy lightweight’ bogus argument: I guess you folks must have missed her debate with Biden or become Fascists and ignore reality: Sarah mopped the floor with Biden in the foreign affairs part of the debate-a Senator supposedly unbeatable because he had 35 years experience in foreign affairs and national security issues.
Get real. Become intellectually honest. You’re beginning to sound like Obama’s trolls.
technopeasant on March 16, 2009 at 5:25 PM
Good Greif cant Michael Steele do anything right ??
William Amos on March 16, 2009 at 5:25 PM
WRONG!!!!
The media will NEVER like her…when will you all learn…
if she will run it will be in 2012…she is immensely popular, raking in the dough with SarahPAC, and by 2016 who knows who else will be ready to lead *cough* Jindal…NO i think it will work best if she, as Reagan did, fixes the mess of the moronic far left, but inlike Reagan hands over the reigns to someone like Jindal and not Bush Sr…
alexraye on March 16, 2009 at 5:26 PM
Fair enough. Romney ran a poor campaign in ’08 and deserved to lose. On the other hand, the economy hadn’t yet cratered and thus his best talent (turning around large scale financial messes like the Olympic Committee and the state of Massachusetts) was marginalized. He also got got caught in a weird triangulation between McCain and Huckabee that is unlikely to recur.
I’m not a huge Romney guy or anything (and in fact would love to vote for someone with his business sense who is also an actual conservative), and of course it’s hard to predict anything this far out, but he looks like the best of the litter to me right now.
Blacksheep on March 16, 2009 at 5:27 PM
Wondering what it might do for RNC coffers if she brought Arlen Specter up to the podium with her and gave him a wedgie.
whitetop on March 16, 2009 at 5:27 PM
The bottom line is this: Sarah will run when the moment is right. If Obama tanks (and as this moment it looks like he is); she will run in 2012. And she will have a $100+ Million in the bank to finance it + a massive grass roots campaign.
Norwegian on March 16, 2009 at 5:28 PM
At this point no one could beat the great Messiah. The man can steal blocks of gold from a federal bank and the american people will still love him.
TimeTraveler on March 16, 2009 at 5:28 PM
Bull, you are seeing it through the MSM prism. More families identify with her situation than you think. You are already starting to see that these hit pieces on her are not sticking as much.
I find the news of this address especially satisfying today b/c it basically eliminated the Levi hit piece from the news cycle in less than 24 hours.
Bottom line is, people in this country have short memories.
davek70 on March 16, 2009 at 5:30 PM
BWAAAHAHAHHAHAAAA
i think it would be safe to say that every Republican in the country would be flat broke from donating everything they have….but not to the RNC but to SarahPAC
alexraye on March 16, 2009 at 5:30 PM
I wish I could go to this but unfortunately will not be able to. In my opinion, she will run in 2012 only if she thinks her family will not be hurt and I’m not sure that will be the case. I would love for her to run though; I definitely would vote for her.
victoria330 on March 16, 2009 at 5:31 PM
jencab on March 16, 2009 at 5:04 PM
Them that has the gold makes the rules.
The reason ‘they have come to the realization’ is that SarahPAC contributions are skyrocketing as SarahPAC has siphoned off huge amounts of money normally in the past that had gone to the RNC.
Sarah is the new kingmaker or power broker in the GOP. She has been the de facto leader of the GOP ever since November 4, 2008. The GOP members in Congress are just waking up to that fact. Sarah’s core supporters have known that all along.
technopeasant on March 16, 2009 at 5:34 PM
LISTEN TO JEFF!
Conressional seats should be the focus right now, and yes, Sarah can help with that too. (but I’d prefer a Romney/Palin ticket. Moderates and blue dogs will die for a leader with the economic prowess of Romney.)
Rovin on March 16, 2009 at 5:35 PM
Hope N Change!
youngO on March 16, 2009 at 5:35 PM
There is a tide in the affairs of men, which taken at the flood, leads on to fortune. Omitted, all the voyage of their life is bound in shallows and in miseries.
That quoted, no one knows what tide will be flowing in 2010 – 12, when Palin would have to decide. She is in a position to delay a positive decision longer than lesser known candidates.
If you think you know what scenario we’ll be facing politically in 2011, and therefore which candidate should be advanced, then I say you’re deluded.
I think she’s the most likely candidate – but that’s far from saying she’s a probable candidate. Say she gives a knockout speech at this event and begins to develop a national Republican voice, becoming the leader of an increasingly popular opposition to Obamanomics. If so, by 2011-2 Sarah Palin will be a much different Sarah Palin than the one supposedly so wounded by the 2008 campaign (there are a lot of politicians who’d sell their souls for such “wounds”).
On the other hand, she could take a longer view, or could already have decided that she’s never going to run for the top job, but have also realized that her influence begins to dissipate as soon as she makes the Shermanesque statement.
I doubt anyone knows, including the Palins, and, even if they did know, events could change their minds.
CK MacLeod on March 16, 2009 at 5:38 PM
If Romney is finacially savvy…Palin may pick him to put in her cabinet in 2012.
Jed1899 on March 16, 2009 at 5:39 PM
Anyone else hoping for Steele/Palin in 2012?
chansen9 on March 16, 2009 at 5:39 PM
Unless the RNC, (Steel) becomes a solid platform for conservaive values, there will be NO MONEY going into that account. Steel’s wishy-washy statements has already done considerable damage. He either needs a strong co-chair or (if he doesn’t re-define himself soon) needs to resign.
Rovin on March 16, 2009 at 5:40 PM
Political career ended by her child? Ummm, excuse me, Al Gore’s kid has been arrested how many times for drugs? The Kennedy’s??? Funny how their idiot kids never seem to diminish their political fortunes. And this is a girl who got pregnant; last time I checked it isn’t criminal.
Erich66 on March 16, 2009 at 5:40 PM
“There’s nowhere to go but up and she’ll get the credit when it happens.
Allahpundit on March 16, 2009 at 5:04 PM”
Wait, your lovely The One gets credit for doing nothing – can’t we apply that to Palin now!
Not that she’d want it. Or take it. That’s the big difference between the two, don’t you think?
And BTW: Palin will run in 2012 unless your The One becomes the American Stalin I believe him to be.
Liberty is dead.
klickink.wordpress.com on March 16, 2009 at 5:40 PM
alexraye on March 16, 2009 at 5:07 PM
‘the RNC are merely using her for publicity’
You know the Cuda always get the last laugh.
Consider Sarah’s keynote speech as like appearing at the football combine in front of a hundred drooling scouts eager in anticipation to watch a can’t-miss thoroughbred and athletic stud.
technopeasant on March 16, 2009 at 5:40 PM
The “fresh wounds” argument, I’m not buying. A couple of Tina Fey impressions and a bad Katie Couric interview are not make or break moments in a career. I think Palin was hampered by the McCain campaign, and there’s very little actual remedial work that she would have to undertake.
I think if Hillary Clinton had run in 2004, she possibly would be President now. It is a mistake to miss these opportunities and let your name slide into obscurity. Many voters see Sarah Palin as the strongest antidote to Barack Obama, for bad and good. She has more credibility running in 2012.
The only consideration that might delay a Palin’s national run is her pipeline deal. Depending on how much progress has been made, she might want to remain in Alaska and see it through closer to completion, which is estimated to be in 2018.
But Mel Martinez is a man, and he can be an RNC co-chairman and receive acknowledgment for a job well done. Make no mistake that Sarah Palin would be portrayed as an idiot cheerleader for the conservatives while the male she co-chaired with would be the one credited with the heavy lifting.
chunderroad on March 16, 2009 at 5:43 PM
I’m a Palin supporter and I would love to see her go through the primary process in 2012. She would mop the floor with most of the contenders.
joedoe on March 16, 2009 at 5:44 PM
no.
HornetSting on March 16, 2009 at 5:44 PM
’10 has to be the focus, I want Pelosi’s plane just for chuckles. I can’t wait to see her retired to the sidelines. Palin should only run as a VP in 12 if she does anything at all. She will not be a credible alternative to Obama at that point. He is a disaster, mind you, but voters will look for someone to clean up the mess. Romney is a mess cleaner. Palin would be a waste of her shot to run in 12.
msmveritas on March 16, 2009 at 5:44 PM
4 months away? the smart money is on palin backing out
gatorboy on March 16, 2009 at 5:45 PM
austinnelly on March 16, 2009 at 5:17 PM
I disagree with you. By November 2010 and with $100m in the bank SarahPAC will become the Republican Party, and the Messiah’s worse nightmare.
technopeasant on March 16, 2009 at 5:45 PM
Time to send another 25 bucks to SarahPAC.com!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
joedoe on March 16, 2009 at 5:47 PM
The answer is obvious-no. 100 mil. won’t even get you started. barry spent nearly 1 bil. this cycle.
thomasaur on March 16, 2009 at 5:47 PM
Comment pages: 1 2 3 4 Next »