Poll: The best and worst Best Movie of the last 40 years

posted at 9:12 am on March 15, 2009 by Ed Morrissey

A few weeks back, we had a lot of fun choosing the worst of Hollywood’s major releases in conjunction with their annual orgy of self-congratulations, the Oscars.  When I posted that poll, many Hot Air readers criticized the Academy Awards as politically driven in both national politics and industry politics, and that the awards in recent years honor the wrong films for the wrong reasons.  To me, that sounds like a great topic for a poll, especially since I’ll be attending the Little Scribe’s baptism and celebrations today.

What was the worst movie to win Best Picture in the last 40 years?  The list below contains some real snoozers, movies that have definitely not stood the test of time.  Some of them had pretty disappointing competition; after all, picking Platoon from as opposed to The Mission, Hannah and Her Sisters, Children of a Lesser God, and A Room with a View could almost be justified as having been the only nominated movie that kept audiences awake.  Others, like Kramer vs Kramer, are practically footnotes to artistic masterpieces it beat like All That Jazz and Apocalypse Now. Who loves the smell of custody hearings in the morning, after all?

I’ve listed a few nominees myself, but unlike our earlier polls, you can add your own suggestions from the list below.  Be sure to copy and paste to get the title exact:

To be fair, this list contains masterpieces of its own. The Lord of the Rings is one of my favorite movies of all time, and I know Braveheart is favored by many Hot Air readers. Patton may be the best war movie of all time, and one of the best depictions of the thin line between genius and madness. Unforgiven haunts, as does Schindler’s List, for very different reasons.

Again, you’re not just stuck with my Magnificent Seven. If you like another on the list, add it and it will become part of the poll. Be sure to cut and paste the title from below in order to make sure it gets counted properly.

On Thursday, Betty Jo Tucker of Movie Addict Headquarters and Jazz Shaw will appear on The Ed Morrissey Show to discuss the results of both polls. Have fun!

The Academy Award database lists these as the nominees:

  • 1968 – Oliver!
  • 1969 – Midnight Cowboy
  • 1970 – Patton
  • 1971 – The French Connection
  • 1972 – The Godfather
  • 1973 – The Sting
  • 1974 – The Godfather Part II
  • 1975 – One Flew over the Cuckoo’s Nest
  • 1976 – Rocky
  • 1977 – Annie Hall
  • 1978 – The Deer Hunter
  • 1979 – Kramer vs. Kramer
  • 1980 – Ordinary People
  • 1981 – Chariots of Fire
  • 1982 – Gandhi
  • 1983 – Terms of Endearment
  • 1984 – Amadeus
  • 1985 – Out of Africa
  • 1986 – Platoon
  • 1987 – The Last Emperor
  • 1988 – Rain Man
  • 1989 – Driving Miss Daisy
  • 1990 – Dances With Wolves
  • 1991 – The Silence of the Lambs
  • 1992 – Unforgiven
  • 1993 – Schindler’s List
  • 1994 – Forrest Gump
  • 1995 – Braveheart
  • 1996 – The English Patient
  • 1997 – Titanic
  • 1998 – Shakespeare in Love
  • 1999 – American Beauty
  • 2000 – Gladiator
  • 2001 – A Beautiful Mind
  • 2002 – Chicago
  • 2003 – The Lord of the Rings: The Return of the King
  • 2004 – Million Dollar Baby
  • 2005 – Crash
  • 2006 – The Departed
  • 2007 – No Country for Old Men
  • 2008 – Slumdog Millionaire

Blowback

Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.

Trackbacks/Pings

Trackback URL

Comments

Comment pages: 1 2 3 4

Just so we’re clear on the quality of Best Picture Oscars:

Star Wars lost to… Annie Hall.

Raging Bull and The Elephant Man and Breaker Morant lost to… Ordinary People.

Oh, and Song of the Year 1977?
The “Theme from Star Wars” lost to “You Light Up My Life”.

DarthBrooks on March 15, 2009 at 1:52 PM

At the risk of getting laughed at, am I the only one who loved Avalon?

Knucklehead on March 15, 2009 at 1:49 PM

I didn’t love it, but I did enjoy it.

myrenovations on March 15, 2009 at 1:54 PM

None of these should be considered great movies.

1968 – Oliver! – Just because there should be a separate category of musicals
1969 – Midnight Cowboy – Seriously over-acted
1977 – Annie Hall- Woody Allen…boring
1979 – Kramer vs. Kramer – More over-acting
1980 – Ordinary People – MTM bad acting
1981 – Chariots of Fire – This story could have been told in a 1/2 hour
1983 – Terms of Endearment – I was glad when Debra Winger’s character finally died
1985 – Out of Africa – Nice scenery
1990 – Dances With Wolves – Way too long
1994 – Forrest Gump – I really hate that movie
1996 – The English Patient – Pathetically boring
1997 – Titanic – Remove the love story and its characters and it would have been a good movie
1998 – Shakespeare in Love – An insult to The Bard
1999 – American Beauty – Worst movie ever
2001 – A Beautiful Mind – Nothing beautiful about it
2002 – Chicago – See Oliver!
2005 – Crash – Second worst movie ever

I have not seen the last three on the list so I can’t comment. Oh, and in case you’re wondering, I really did see all those movies, I used to be a local so -called movie critic.

Deanna on March 15, 2009 at 1:59 PM

Slumdog Millionaire should have won the Oscar for Best Overrated Movie Ever! Anyone who grew up in Israel during the invasion of Bollywood (early 80s) knows that Slumdog is a typical Indian Soap Movie with a bigger budget. That’s not to say that there are no good Indian movies, there are plenty, but Slumdog Millionaire is not one of them.

The movie that deserved the 2008 Best Picture wasn’t even on the list, I refer of course to The Dark Knight, which wasn’t just another big budget superhero movie, it was a cinematic masterpiece. But I guess the analogies to the War on Terror were too much “on the nose” for Liberal Hollywood: “Some men aren’t looking for anything logical. They can’t be bought, bullied, reasoned or negotiated with. Some men just want to watch the world burn.”

Michelle Dubois on March 15, 2009 at 2:00 PM

How about the Best Movie witht the worst ending.
hawkdriver on March 15, 2009 at 1:46 PM

How about best selling books made into a sub-par movies? Since I read way more than I watch movies, I’ll start with….

The Kite Runner

Fabulous book, so-so movie.

Knucklehead on March 15, 2009 at 2:01 PM

Wow, I’ve watched hardly any of these movies. I feel blessed.

Aronne on March 15, 2009 at 2:03 PM

Oh, and Song of the Year 1977?
The “Theme from Star Wars” lost to “You Light Up My Life”.

DarthBrooks on March 15, 2009 at 1:52 PM

Actually they both won, one for song of the year and one for musical score (and for that John Williams defeated himself by winning for Star Wars and losing for Close Encounters of the Third Kind). For some insane reason, “You Light Up My Life” won a Grammy for song of the year and then was nominated and was a finalist for song of the year the next year!

okonkolo on March 15, 2009 at 2:04 PM

Give me a movie like The Best Years of Our Lives (1946). Well worth finding it and watching. It takes you through the lives of three men once they return from WWII. A reality check about the post-war lives of vets, and this was in a time it was always
honorable to be one.

jcheney on March 15, 2009 at 11:27 AM

I saw this wonderful film for the first time during the height of the anti-Iraq protesting. I was shocked to see a Code Pink-type character in the movie bemoaning the war as a waste of American lives for nothing. I had no idea that there were people at the time who felt this way.

Favorite John Wayne: True Grit

Worst of the Best: Annie Hall – boring, self-indulgent dreck. Not to mention my teenage friends and I were incensed that it won over Star Wars.
Best of the Best: Braveheart, Schindler’s List, LOTR

inmypajamas on March 15, 2009 at 2:04 PM

Fabulous book, so-so movie.

Knucklehead on March 15, 2009 at 2:01 PM

No KH, both were good. Now we have to duel.

hawkdriver on March 15, 2009 at 2:05 PM

Out of that whole list the film I want to see the least are Oliver, Ordinary People, and Terms of Endearment, all overrated, but my vote goes to Kramer because of the films it defeated.

okonkolo on March 15, 2009 at 2:06 PM

The true impact of war can be seen through “Since You Went Away” and “The Fighting Sullivans.” Have a full box of Kleenex for each.

Pelayo on March 15, 2009 at 2:09 PM

Raging Bull and The Elephant Man and Breaker Morant lost to… Ordinary People.

DarthBrooks on March 15, 2009 at 1:52 PM

Amazing. Vote splitting, no doubt, but still….

okonkolo on March 15, 2009 at 2:09 PM

The worst: Too many to list.

The Best:
1: The Outlaw Josey Wales.
2: Unforgiven.
3: The Godfather. (I-II)
4: The Lord of the Rings Trilogy.
5: Full Metal Jacket.
6: Blazing Saddles.

Done. Period.

Claypigeon on March 15, 2009 at 2:11 PM

But the original question was, how many of the people talking about what a piece of crap Milk was actually watched it? Or did you hear that it was a “lefty” film and just decide to trash it and declare that it lacked the cinematic muscle to be in the best film category?

Jazz Shaw on March 15, 2009 at 1:26 PM

Okay, I did see Milk. I thought Penn was horrible. He sounded like his character in I Am Sam, it was disjointed and odd. I question whether Harvey Milk acutally sounded that way. I recall hearing him speak a few times but I don’t recall him sounding that odd. Maybe Penn thought that is how Gay men sound? At any rate, it really put me off. The movie itself was interesting but not something I would classify as great.

Deanna on March 15, 2009 at 2:12 PM

No KH, both were good. Now we have to duel.

hawkdriver on March 15, 2009 at 2:05 PM

You’re on Big Boy!

Fabulous book, Where the Truth Lies and a total bomb of a movie with Kevin Bacon and Colin Firth.

I sure wish Ed would start threads like this one about books.

Knucklehead on March 15, 2009 at 2:13 PM

The Deer Hunter was a great movie, why’d you put it on the worst list?

eski502 on March 15, 2009 at 2:20 PM

There are some good ones there and it’s hard to choose. It would be nice if we could give our own first, second and third choices (which would award them, say, five, three and one votes each).

Tzetzes on March 15, 2009 at 2:23 PM

The ones I’ve seen and liked are:

Patton
Chariots of Fire
Gandhi
Amadeus
The Last Emperor
Schindler’s List
Forrest Gump
Shakespeare in Love
Gladiator
Lord of the Rings

I confess that I really wasn’t moved too much Braveheart. The Godfather was pretty good though. I liked The Silence of the Lambs as a fifteen-year-old when it came out, but couldn’t bear to watch it now (yuck!). We saw Dances With Wolves in high school (sic!). No interest in Chicago or Titanic.

Tzetzes on March 15, 2009 at 2:31 PM

Oh, and Song of the Year 1977?
The “Theme from Star Wars” lost to “You Light Up My Life”.

DarthBrooks on March 15, 2009 at 1:52 PM

Both are loads better than “It’s hard out here fo’ a pimp”.

myrenovations on March 15, 2009 at 2:35 PM

1998 – Shakespeare in Love – An insult to The Bard

Deanna on March 15, 2009 at 1:59 PM

I spent a year in Stratford doing the MA in Shakespeare Studies. And, for what it’s worth, Harold Bloom and I for the most part liked Shakespeare in Love. (At the Shakespeare Institute it’s practically required viewing.)

Tzetzes on March 15, 2009 at 2:37 PM

I agree with stormin1961; Godfather II ekes out The Godfather. Crash is the worst.
No Country for Old Men and The Departed are my favorite recent films.
I just did not understand the hype around There Will Be Blood.

carbon_footprint on March 15, 2009 at 2:41 PM

1985 – Out of Africa – Nice scenery

Deanna on March 15, 2009 at 1:59 PM

I really liked Out of Africa, mainly for the amazing scenic vistas and for the lush evocative soundtrack. The story was pretty interesting, too, but nothing to write home about. Redford was just so-so. But the music & scenery — beautiful.

KS Rex on March 15, 2009 at 2:41 PM

The Deer Hunter was a great movie, why’d you put it on the worst list?

eski502 on March 15, 2009 at 2:20 PM

The first hour or so of that movie seems like 4 hours. Second half though is terrific.

ddrintn on March 15, 2009 at 2:41 PM

I sure wish Ed would start threads like this one about books.

Knucklehead on March 15, 2009 at 2:13 PM

Oh, come on now, everyone knows us conservatives would rather burn books than read them.

Just ask any randomly selected member of AMPAS.

Russ on March 15, 2009 at 2:46 PM

Three comments from me personally:

1. Shakespeare in Love was a great movie…whimsical and very well done, spinning the story behind the story of ‘Romeo and Juli’-er, make that ‘Romeo and Ethel the Pirate’s Daughter’…BUT in NO WAY was that a better film than ‘Saving Private Ryan’. That was the best film BY FAR that year, bar NONE.

2. I’ll say this as a straight man too: anyone out there dissing ‘Titanic’ is fooling themselves and everyone else. Sure a few of the characters were two dimensional and everyone knew what was going to happen in the end, but the characters in this case take second billing to the event itself…the tragedy of the sinking and the loss of life through human error. And yeah, it wasn’t a big complicated character study people would sit around sipping tea and discussing, it in effect was an old school 1930s melodrama retold with modern effects and that to me is a draw…we need more simple, basic, powerful movies like they made in Hollywood’s heyday.

I guarantee even the hardest hardcore guys watching that movie were crying their eyes out when no one was looking. If it wasn’t the poor families trapped in steerage, hugging in their beds waiting to drown…if it wasn’t Leo DiCaprio knowingly freezing himself to death to save Kate Winslet…you HAD to just lose it at the end when Rose passes in her sleep and goes down to rejoin Jack and all the others who died on the ship. If that didn’t get you, you probably laughed your way through ‘Schindler’s List’.

3. They need to create some kind of special award for ‘Last Of The Mohicans’ and give it retroactively to the entire cast/crew of that movie. Call it the Oscar for ‘Best Picture that should’ve been nominated but wasn’t’ award. Never before or since has such a gorgeous movie been made…it was like a living painting, it didn’t even need a script, just the soundtrack, because all the acting spoke for itself. An all-time classic.

MangoDaddy on March 15, 2009 at 2:47 PM

2. I’ll say this as a straight man too: anyone out there dissing ‘Titanic’ is fooling themselves and everyone else. Sure a few of the characters were two dimensional and everyone knew what was going to happen in the end, but the characters in this case take second billing to the event itself…the tragedy of the sinking and the loss of life through human error. And yeah, it wasn’t a big complicated character study people would sit around sipping tea and discussing, it in effect was an old school 1930s melodrama retold with modern effects and that to me is a draw…we need more simple, basic, powerful movies like they made in Hollywood’s heyday.

Bleagh. As someone said earlier, the characters and soapy story weigh the whole movie down.

ddrintn on March 15, 2009 at 2:53 PM

At the risk of getting laughed at, am I the only one who loved Avalon?

Knucklehead on March 15, 2009 at 1:49 PM

Absolutely not! I love Avalon. I show that movie to my students whenever I can remotely make it fit.

DrMagnolias on March 15, 2009 at 2:53 PM

I liked Pan’s Labyrinth.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=n9YD2PFF31E
http://www.panslabyrinth.com/

Mostly because of the message at the end of the movie.
Highly recommended!

Kini on March 15, 2009 at 2:55 PM

^ Compare it with the dramatization of Walter Lord’s A Night to Remember, made sometime in the ’50s.

ddrintn on March 15, 2009 at 2:55 PM

Wow, I guess I don’t see enough movies, I’ve missed most of The Best Pictures Of The Last 40 Years. (That might be good, though.)

The ones I’ve seen (most on teevee):
1973 – The Sting — clever and funny – very enjoyable
1976 – Rocky — dopey, but very feel-good — enjoyable
1977 – Annie Hall — don’t remember much about it, but I do recall enjoying it — Allen can be a hoot
1979 – Kramer vs. Kramer — decent, but Lifetime channel material, not best pic
1981 – Chariots of Fire — one of the best of the best – probably has the distinction of the last overtly Christian best pic
1982 – Gandhi — I’m not sure how historically accurate it was, but I found it fascinating & really enjoyed the peek at British-rule India
1985 – Out of Africa — pretty good story, great music & scenery (see my other post)
1988 – Rain Man — Hoffman was awesome
1990 – Dances With Wolves — dopey, PC, and too long
1994 – Forrest Gump — interesting from the perspective of “could someone really influence history this way”, but not a best pic by any means
1997 – Titanic — clever story line (modern-day Rose remembering) and great special effects
1998 – Shakespeare in Love — interesting period piece
2003 – The Lord of the Rings: The Return of the King — awesome story, acting, special effects, but it ran a little long — well-deserved best pic

KS Rex on March 15, 2009 at 3:02 PM

Tzetzes on March 15, 2009 at 2:37 PM

You know why Shakespeare in Love is the worst Best Movie of all time?

I beat Saving Private Ryan. Not even kidding. So sorry, I mean, I even liked the movie, but it robbed Saving Private Ryan, and I can’t forgive it for that.

apollyonbob on March 15, 2009 at 3:03 PM

Compare it with the dramatization of Walter Lord’s A Night to Remember, made sometime in the ’50s.

ddrintn on March 15, 2009 at 2:55 PM

Absolutely agree! A Night to Remember is a far better movie about the Titanic than the overblown latest soap opera filled, special effects crapola.

There were no tears from this old chick at the end of Titanic, just a sign relief that it was finally over.

Knucklehead on March 15, 2009 at 3:05 PM

My pick for best: Godfather. Worst: Titanic. (I’ve only seen parts of Titanic, and have never been persuaded to continue watching.)

Bill Holden! I’m not for human cloning, unless they could clone him. And Robert Mitchum.

Almost no Out of Africa fans. I love that film. Streep is great, Redford is horrible (as usual – virtually every line sounds wooden and false.) Klaus Maria Brandauer more than makes up for him though.

I liked Crash well enough. A lot of stupid bits, but in the end I felt surprised by some of the storylines, and nowadays just being surprised, even a little bit, makes me feel like I’ve come out ahead.

I think there should be some category that Harry Potter films could win. Like “best visualization of a fictional place”, lol. I thought Hogwarts looked pretty nifty in those films! And the Narnia films could be contenders.

Stella451 on March 15, 2009 at 3:06 PM

Too bad this poll didn’t go back one additional year-1967 had two absolutely great films up for best picture, and neither of them won. Those would be “The Graduate” and “Bonnie and Clyde”.

The winner that year was a compromise-”In The Heat of the Night”. Not a bad film, but it hasn’t aged nearly as well as those other two.

Strangely enough, one of the major stars of “In The Heat of the Night” was Sidney Poitier, and he wasn’t even nominated. Nor was he nominated for the other two films he did the same year, “Guess Who’s Coming to Dinner” and “To Sir With Love”.

Del Dolemonte on March 15, 2009 at 3:06 PM

You know why Shakespeare in Love is the worst Best Movie of all time?

I beat Saving Private Ryan. Not even kidding. So sorry, I mean, I even liked the movie, but it robbed Saving Private Ryan, and I can’t forgive it for that.

apollyonbob on March 15, 2009 at 3:03 PM

Fine, and that wasn’t right (SPR was incredibly good). But that doesn’t make SiL a bad film! :)

Tzetzes on March 15, 2009 at 3:09 PM

Avalon-we’re talking the 1990′s Avalon, right-is my favorite movie of all time.
Speaking of favorites-does anyone remember “My Favorite Year”?
Peter O’Toole was phenomenal !

annoyinglittletwerp on March 15, 2009 at 3:13 PM

I should mention that though I’m “technically” female-LoL-
I’m a big fan of period military movies like: Master & Commander, Gallipoli, Breaker Morant, Patton, etc.
I didn’t like “Saving Private Ryan”. It was a vehicle for Tom Hanks. “Band of Brothers”-I know it wasn’t in theaters-is THE standard when it comes to war flicks.

annoyinglittletwerp on March 15, 2009 at 3:20 PM

This kind of thread is fun, but also depressing. I worry about the movie legacy we are leaving our grandchildren compared to what was left to us. So many of the Best Pictures and other popular flix are so dripping with f-bombs, gratuitous nudity & sex, and totally unnecessary gore. In nearly every case, Hollywood could have made a show that was every bit as enjoyable, artistic, and important without the R-rated material. Look at North By Northwest or Rear Window — edge-of-your seat thrillers without all the baggage of today’s movies. (Or The Great Escape & Sands of Iwo Jima for the war genre.) I can’t imagine sitting down with one of my future grandchildren in 2040 enjoying Crash or even Platoon. It really makes me sad for our future generations.

KS Rex on March 15, 2009 at 3:23 PM

Lord of the Rings, the entire trilogy.

Though in all fairness I’ve been a Tolkien fan for thirty years, so you’ll have to take my opinion with a grain of salt.

For a year and a half before the film’s release, I had worried that the films would be horrible, that my beloved books would be eviscerated.

However, after my first viewing of “Fellowship” it was clear to me that Peter Jackson and company had approached the films with a very respectful and talented hand. I thanked God for Professor Tolkien and Peter Jackson that night, and silently prayed that I wouldn’t get hit by a truck over the next two years so I could see the rest of the films. ;)

And though I do love all three of the films I do consider “Fellowship” to be the strongest and most faithful of the three.

~*~

And Outlaw Josey Wales is just a brilliant movie. Clint Eastwood is a national treasure.

I don’t read much sci-fi but back in college I read Orson Scott Card’s “Ender’s Game” and I think that would make a great film. With the dearth of original movie ideas, I’m curious as to why it’s never been made.

Niere on March 15, 2009 at 3:23 PM

El Laberinto Del Fauno

Kini on March 15, 2009 at 3:55 PM

Best = Annie Hall

Worst = Chicago

It would have been nice if Mad Ed had listed these out as pre-codes, but I just put them into the “Other” category.

No politics here…one movie was great, and the other one sucked.

asc85 on March 15, 2009 at 4:00 PM

It rubs the lotion on its skin
or else it gets the hose again.

classic couplet.

jaime on March 15, 2009 at 4:09 PM

How about best selling books made into a sub-par movies? Since I read way more than I watch movies, I’ll start with….

The Kite Runner

Fabulous book, so-so movie.

Knucklehead on March 15, 2009 at 2:01 PM

“The Sum of All Fears”

Johan Klaus on March 15, 2009 at 4:13 PM

In my mind –

Best

War –
* They were expendable
* Mrs. Minniver

Western –
* High Noon
* Rio Lobo

Comedy –
* Bringing up baby
* Father of the Bride (S. Tracy version)

Chic Flick –
* Titanic (It was about her not him.)
* Driving Miss Daisy

SciFi –
* Forbidden Planet
* Dark Star

Movies I wish I had a refund for –

* Austin Powers
* Tootsie
* Easy Rider
* Tron
* What Women Want
* Kill Bill

Dr. Dog on March 15, 2009 at 4:18 PM

Jurrasic Park was a pretty good book. The movie however lost something in the translation. Andromeda strain the same way.

Dr. Dog on March 15, 2009 at 4:21 PM

There’s been a mistake–LOTR was placed in the wrong list.

exlibris on March 15, 2009 at 4:30 PM

Why is Rocky on the worst movie list? Anyway…

1972 – The Godfather – Incredibly overrated movie
1976 – Rocky – One of the best series (the first 4 anyway)
1978 – The Deer Hunter – Stupid
1986 – Platoon – Laughable
1987 – The Last Emperor – Boring
1988 – Rain Man – Overrated
1989 – Driving Miss Daisy – Depressing
1990 – Dances With Wolves – Overrated
1991 – The Silence of the Lambs – I don’t get the appeal
1992 – Unforgiven – Excellent, one of Clint’s best
1993 – Schindler’s List – Excellent
1994 – Forrest Gump – What a dumb ass movie, this beat The Shawshank Redemption?
1995 – Braveheart – Awesome
1996 – The English Patient – Boring as hell
1997 – Titanic – Good special effects, massively overrated
1999 – American Beauty – Dumb as hell
2000 – Gladiator – Could have been better
2001 – A Beautiful Mind – Overrated
2003 – The Lord of the Rings – The Return of the King – The series was excellent not just this one
2004 – Million Dollar Baby – Depressing
2005 – Crash – Ok but way over hyped
2006 – The Departed – What a pile of crap

Best Movies of all time:

Band of Brothers Series
Black Hawk Down
Braveheart
LOTR Series
Star Wars Series (yeah all of them)
The Shawshank Redemption

Worst Movies of all time:

Brokeback Mountain
Fight Club
Munich
Pulp Fiction
Sin City
The Big Lebowski

Poptech on March 15, 2009 at 4:33 PM

Fame sucked.

Rent sucked.

Any movie with Whoopie sucks!!

madmonkphotog on March 15, 2009 at 4:35 PM

Poptech on March 15, 2009 at 4:33 PM

WHAT?!?!?!?

How can you knock the Dude?

madmonkphotog on March 15, 2009 at 4:35 PM

The Kite Runner

Fabulous book, so-so movie.

Knucklehead on March 15, 2009 at 2:01 PM

Didn’t read the book, but found the film extremely moving.

How can you knock the Dude?

madmonkphotog on March 15, 2009 at 4:35 PM

Lebowski is a work of genius. Why didn’t I think to put that on there?

Tzetzes on March 15, 2009 at 4:55 PM

I liked The Silence of the Lambs as a fifteen-year-old when it came out, but couldn’t bear to watch it now (yuck!).

Tzetzes on March 15, 2009 at 2:31 PM

The Silence of the Lambs seemed like a copy of an earlier movie “Manhunter”.

Johan Klaus on March 15, 2009 at 4:57 PM

Amadeus Amadeus Amadeus

WasatchMan on March 15, 2009 at 5:02 PM

I liked Pan’s Labyrinth.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=n9YD2PFF31E
http://www.panslabyrinth.com/

Mostly because of the message at the end of the movie.
Highly recommended!

Kini on March 15, 2009 at 2:55 PM

I hated the movie, mainly because I kept wanting the “heroes” in movie A to get killed by the villains (movie B was decent, though). It’s a bit like watching a movie about the Iran-Iraq war, and being asked to cheer for either of them. The best that can be said for the Spanish Civil War is that the least objectionable side won, which is not something that can be said of Pan’s Labyrinth.

JSchuler on March 15, 2009 at 5:10 PM

The “Dude” is the re-incarnation of Glen Neighbors, a guy that I know, that was the star in a Japanese motorcycle road movie. No one else could dress like, walk like, talk like, look like or any other way mimic Glen.

Johan Klaus on March 15, 2009 at 5:16 PM

Best: Godfather I – my all-time best
Second: Silence of the Lambs
Third: Crash
Fourth: Patton

Worst: English Patient – boring!
Close seconds: Forest Gump, American Beauty

Beyond worst: Schenectoche New York — Absolutely the most boring useless movie that has ever been made and that will ever be made.

AustinNorth on March 15, 2009 at 5:16 PM

Anyone who says The Big Lebowski sucked should be deported to the Sudan. Or maybe San Francisco.

Percy_Peabody on March 15, 2009 at 5:28 PM

Best ‘best picture’ of all time: tie between Casablanca & Lawrence of Arabia

Worst ‘best’ last 40 yrs: Titanic. My friends were all swooning.
Best ‘best’ last 40 yrs: Can’t decide between ROTK [book was better], Chariots of Fire, & Schindler’s List [book was better]

youngTXcon on March 15, 2009 at 5:30 PM

ROCKY on the list of the worst??? The original Rocky? Are you kidding me? Have you seen that film lately, or are you just going from memory or the aftertaste of Rocky V or something?

Rocky is one of the great American films. Frank Capra even called it one of the only film in the seventies that he would’ve made himself. Great character, great screenplay, great performances, iconic in every way… and also uplifting, positive, and with a really good moral center.

Rocky is one of the best Best PIcture winners – not the worst.

daviddunn on March 15, 2009 at 5:31 PM

Kramer vs. Kramer…even the advertisements they bombarded us with made me gag.

Anything with Meryl Streep in it really blows. The lady can’t act her way out of a speeding ticket, and yet they kissed her behind for decades as being the quintessential actress. Give me a break.

A few others that I think were great in that time period:

A Clockwork Orange
The Wild Geese
A Bridge Too Far
The Day of the Jackal (original)
Goodfellas/Casino
Once Upon A Time In The West
Das Boot
Jeremiah Johnson
True Grit
Jesus Christ Superstar

Dr. ZhivBlago on March 15, 2009 at 5:38 PM

Best John Wayne: The Man Who Shot Liberty Valence

youngTXcon on March 15, 2009 at 5:39 PM

Best John Wayne: The Man Who Shot Liberty Valence

youngTXcon on March 15, 2009 at 5:39 PM

Nah, Jimmy Stewart’s too much of an over-actor in that flick.
Best Wayne movie was The Quiet Man.

Y-not on March 15, 2009 at 6:10 PM

most people don’t, but I include “re-watchability” as the most important factor in judging “best” movies.

that’s why I think “The Matrix” and “The Usual Suspects” are the two best movies.

Opinionnation on March 15, 2009 at 6:14 PM

Worst Ever. Titantic. Only Hollywood could take a unbelievable tragedy and turn it into a flakey love story.

Can we go back a few more years so we can include Humphrey Bogart? Even Bogarts worst movies are better than most of the movies on the “Best” list.

Treasure of the Sierra Madre
Key Largo
The Maltese Falcon
To Have And Have Not
We’re No Angels (Not great, but one of my favorites)

primer on March 15, 2009 at 6:17 PM

Y-not on March 15, 2009 at 6:10 PM
I really like the interaction between the 2 of them in that movie. You also got to see some of Wayne’s true feelings about life, etc. Ford’s idea of also turning the idea of the Western genre on its’ head is also interesting to me.

You’re right that, in terms of classic John Wayne, The Quiet Man is his best film.

youngTXcon on March 15, 2009 at 6:20 PM

Shakespeare in Love. No question.

Seriously, how can anyone claim that this film was better than Saving Private Ryan AND The Big Lebowski?

phelps on March 15, 2009 at 6:23 PM

Crash. Good Lord, I did not get the hype. I thought Brokeback Mountain should have won over Crash. I’ll freely admit I’m gay — and I also thought BBM should not have won best picture either. But out of the field of contenders, BBM was the clear win for cast performance and direction.

Crash was just a series of incredible cliches. Incredible. Cliches. I could not get over how forced it was. I have no idea how it was.

Runner-Up? Tie “Chicago” beating out “The Hours,” and — ironically — “A Beautiful Mind” besting “Moulin Rouge” the year prior. I cannot believe the pedestrian “Chicago” won an AA over “Moulin Rogue,” whereas “A Beautiful Mind” beat out “The Hours” as a dramatic piece. Such imbalance in the force.

Che sera sera.

lansing quaker on March 15, 2009 at 6:23 PM

Deer Hunter is disgustingly bad. Anyone who disagrees needs to sit through it again and question the reality of it.

American Beauty is miserable.

The Godfather is retarded. The best, most realistic Mob movie of all time is GoodFellas.

Patton, Unforgiven, The Sting are damn good movies.

moc23 on March 15, 2009 at 6:30 PM

Glengarry Glenross is one of the greatest movies ever made. Although it is more of a play on film than a movie.

moc23 on March 15, 2009 at 6:31 PM

“The authour of the original novel, Anthony Burgess, hated it too. Kubrick changed the ending to put his own nihilistic spin on it.”

I believe the original US book edition left the last chapter out and Kubrick worked off the US version.

Though I love Malcolm McDowall’s over the top performance every time I watch I notice more and more how he and the other droogies were WAY too old for the parts. It was supposed to be about a 14-year-old leading a gang of 16-year-olds and MM was pushing thirty. Kubrick not changing the language or situations involving ‘little Alex’ being truant, etc. get ever more jarring.

kd6rxl on March 15, 2009 at 6:35 PM

When Out of Africa beat The Color Purple in 85 I looked at it as the ulitmate “formula” best picture.

Out of Africa (1985): On of my all-time biggest best picture complaints. It is the ultimate in formula best picture. That formula can easily be broken down into this:

A + B + C + D + E = Best Picture.

Broken down this way.

Actor: Name male actor (Redford)

Actress: Babe or Box Office draw (Streep)

Cinematgraphy: (gorgeous languid shots of Africa)

Director: Name director (Sydney Pollack)

Supporting Performance Excellent: (Klaus Maria Brandauer)

Teacher in Tejas on March 15, 2009 at 6:47 PM

MangoDaddy on March 15, 2009 at 2:47 PM

Agreed with all your points. Last Of The Mohicans was an incredible movie never seen.

Teacher, I’m with you, Out of Africa was a painfully slow program movie, worthy of a MST3K riff.

For all here, a GREAT movie most have never seen is The Greatest Game Ever Played with Shia LaBeouf as Francis Ouimet and the story of the 1913 U.S. Open. No more said! Watch and enjoy!

itsspideyman on March 15, 2009 at 6:59 PM

One thing a lot of Gen X-Y-Z-whatever types may not realize is how shocking movies like ‘Patton’ and ‘The Godfather’ were considered in their day. I was in high school during that era and I remember plenty of audience gasps, for example, when Moe Green gets shot in the eye. Now such scenes are shown uncut on TV. ‘Clockwork Orange’ (rated X) had such a reputation my crowd balked at trying to sneak in.

kd6rxl on March 15, 2009 at 7:01 PM

It’s just too hard to say “best picture ever”…
My list would include;

The Longest Day
Unforgiven
Million Dollar Baby
Hildalgo
The Last Samurai
Second Hand Lions
Gladiator

sabbott on March 15, 2009 at 7:07 PM

kd6rxl on March 15, 2009 at 7:01 PM

I saw The Godfather in the theatre and remember a shriek from someone when Moe Green got shot, as well gasps from all around.

Interesting fact; The Godfather was the last movie filmed in Technicolor. They needed to make sure to capture the rich earth tones of the first film when they filmed Godfather II.

itsspideyman on March 15, 2009 at 7:07 PM

Another good idea for a poll might be to list several notable movies from each of the years in question, (not just the Oscar nominees), and let people pick which ones they’d give the Oscar to now, in hindsight.

joe_doufu on March 15, 2009 at 7:42 PM

Mango, thanks for agreeing on “Out of ZZZZZZZZZZ” and I totally agree with you and others on Last of the Mohicans, blood stirring, violent, gorgeously shot, well acted, two hours of as perfect movie making as you will ever find. I used to talk about this in my history class and told my kids that the scene where Hawkeye charges accross the battlefield to save Cora DEFINES the word “romance.”

They used to look at me quizzically and then I would tell them to look up romance in the dictionary and get back to me.

Teacher in Tejas on March 15, 2009 at 7:52 PM

I generally don’t like stories that follow a formula, unless that movie is about a true historical event with the formula woven in.

Most movies follow a general forumula such as:

Boy meets girl; relationship develops; something places relationship in jeopardy; great effort required to save relationship; boy and girl together forever. The end.

When a movie comes along that doesn’t follow a formula, meaning I can’t figure it out in the first 30 mins, I tend to like it a lot. There are a few movies that are remarkable to me: Blade Runner, Alien (original only), and perhaps the strangest of all, Cube. These are movies that were so different from the cookie cutter movies they are all but unknown. Except for Alien.

Of course, I am biased towards Sci-Fi when done well. Fantasy storys (like LOTR) are dangerous to commit to film. Some stories just can’t be put on film, like Legend, the epic Tom Cruise failure. If Top Gun hadn’t been his follow-up movie to Legend, he’d be pumping gas in LA somewhere.

BobMbx on March 15, 2009 at 8:04 PM

1997 – Titanic – Remove the love story and its characters and it would have been a good movie

Even that harsh editing wouldn’t save one of the worst movies of the last 20 years. For the time, there were some really neat special effects (that look pretty lame on HDTV) but anybody who thinks DiCapprio has talent deserves a piece of crap like Titanic.

highhopes on March 15, 2009 at 9:06 PM

Teacher, I’m with you, Out of Africa was a painfully slow program movie, worthy of a MST3K riff

IMO, it is one of those movies you almost have to see in a theater because the real star is the landscapes, not the actors.

highhopes on March 15, 2009 at 9:08 PM

I do not expect stupid errors in movies, and when I see them; It spoils the whole experience. In the “Valachi Papers” an incident in Valachi’s life during prohibition is portrayed where he drives a truck off the dock and into what I presume is the Hudson River. In the background is a nice shot of the New York skyline including the World Trade Center! In another scene a camera car is shooting back toward a 1930s Duesebnberg and along side it and slightly behind is a 1966 Mercury Comet. This is sloppy moviemaking.

Braveheart struck me as a movie put together by people who cared for accuracy. Before the invention of gunpowder, what would be the command for a group of archers to release their arrows? “Loose!” certainly is a better word than “Fire!” Although using “fire” instead of “loose” or “shoot” would not disqualify a best picture nominee, it shoud deserve an asterisk.

Pelayo on March 15, 2009 at 9:22 PM

I agree that Band of Brothers set the standard for war movies. It was also as good as Ambrose’s book and that is a rare thing, indeed!

jsanderssr on March 15, 2009 at 9:37 PM

Just saw this at Instapundit – Ron Silver has died from esophegal cancer. Too bad, he really seemed like a good guy. His best role was probably in REVERSAL OF FORTUNE, as Alan Dershowitz.

grahampowell on March 15, 2009 at 9:38 PM

I voted “Shakespeare in Love”, mostly because it went on to win Best Picture from the far superior “Saving Private Ryan”. And of course, today most people don’t remember Shakespeare in Love, however it will be a long time before “Saving Private Ryan” will be forgotten.

risawn on March 15, 2009 at 9:46 PM

Of the 41 movies listed, I have seen exactly two: Patton and Gandhi. Of the remainder, there are only two or three that I would consider watching… eventually. The rest simply do not interest me.

Rusty Bill on March 15, 2009 at 9:53 PM

The best picture ever: “The Lion in Winter”, 1969.

TomJW on March 15, 2009 at 10:01 PM

Unforgiven is one of the most overrated movies ever. I’m a fan of everyone in the movie, but it’s one cliche after another and Gene Hackman and Richard Harris were totally underused in the story. Morgan Freeman was only cast out of the Morgan-Freeman-must-narrate-clause. The adulation thrown it’s way is only because of who is in it, not the movie itself.

Moesart on March 15, 2009 at 10:26 PM

I can’t believe no one mentioned Ben Hur!

I had bought the DVD at Wal-Mart because I was curious enough about the story. By the ending, I was in tears. I lent it to a friend of mine: she saw it with her husband and son, who was about eight at that time. They never knew about it before I showed it to them: in fact, they had ZERO clue that it picked the biggest boatload of Oscars way long before Titanic and LOTR ROTK.

They LOVED it, especially their son.

newton on March 15, 2009 at 10:36 PM

Teacher in Tejas,

Thank you for your kind words…if you’re ever around the NC/SC area, you MUST make a point to go to Chimney Rock National Park in western NC…it’s where they filmed the bulk of ‘Last of The Mohicans’ and you can actually walk the path up the side of the mountain where the final clash happens between Hawkeye and his bro/dad and the Hurons.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5SoeDAPj6gg

You walk right up the whole way, right past where Uncas gets knifed and his girl jumps off the cliff, and through some trees, right up the the jutting overhang and waterfall where in that AWESOME last stand Magwa gets slain in combat by Chingichkook. It literally is as it is in the film…breathtaking.

MangoDaddy on March 15, 2009 at 11:11 PM

Sometimes the true significance of a movie is apparently only in the context of history. Looking back, it seems nothing short of amazing that “Star Wars” was *not* awarded Best Picture in 1977, and naming the movie that beat it is a Trivial Pursuit question that few people under the age of 40 could hope to answer. The Academy is notorious for allowing various political and cultural considerations to distort its view of films, which explains why something like “Kramer vs. Kramer” was seen as Huge and Relevant at the time, or why they just couldn’t bring themselves to acknowledge the highest-grossing film of 2008 was also its Best Picture.

I don’t know if it could ever be seriously viewed as a Best Picture contender, but my favorite example of a relatively unpopular and largely-ignored film that cast a remarkably long shadow was “Blade Runner.” A whole generation of filmmakers had their minds blown by that movie, even though audiences at the time didn’t quite appreciate it.

“Return of the King” probably won a sort of combined award for the entire series, but the earlier films should have been given more recognition in their own right. The “Lord of the Rings” trilogy stands as one of the finest examples of an existing work adapted for the screen, along with “The Godfather” and “Jaws.” The latter movie deserves recognition as one of the best examples of a movie vastly improving on the source material – the book is fat and flabby enough to choke a shark. Spielberg and his team did a superb job of cutting away extraneous subplots, using outstanding direction and visual effects to provide the visceral tension the story required, and using fine actors to bring the characters alive more efficiently than the book did.

I have a special affection for “Return of the King” because of how vividly it brought Tolkien’s world to life – it was awesome in the true meaning of the word. I found myself deeply moved by moments that might not have seemed so powerful in the hands of a lesser director. The first time I saw it in a theater, people nearly wept at the first ride through Minas Tirith, and gasped aloud when Elrond brought out the sword and reminded Aragorn of his destiny. You don’t get enough moments like that in movies, because Hollywood is timid about touching on the eternal truths and primal themes that illuminate the great myths and legends – they’re too invested in manipulation, sarcasm, and political messages.

It speaks volumes about Hollywood that a studio assumed it could hire the same director to adapt a similar work of genre fiction and produce the same kind of success, without pausing to consider that audiences might react to timeless themes of heroism and sacrifice differently than post-modern deconstruction and bitter nihilism… and so, at this very moment, a group of studio execs are shaking their heads and wondering how the guy who made them a bundle with “300″ could lose them a fortune with “Watchmen.”

Doctor Zero on March 15, 2009 at 11:57 PM

Newton,

I SWEAR I was about to say that!

I’ll write what I was going to write anyway : )

My ‘Best’ Best Pic Oscar of all time: ‘Ben Hur’…what else has to be said?

Best Manly Man among Men: Daniel Day Lewis as Hawkeye in ‘Last of The Mohicans’…doctors use clips of him in this movie to treat low testosterone.

Best Soliloqy: Quint recounting the sinking of the USS Indianapolis in ‘Jaws’…absolutely hair raising, and Robert Shaw wrote the lines himself.

Second Best Soliloqy: Anything Al Pacino did, just pick one.

Best Holy Shit Moment #1 tie: The hand coming out of the TV in ‘Poltergeist’…only because a kid my sis was babysitting actually shit himself when this happened. Seriously.

Best Holy Shit Moment #1 tie: When Cheif Brody is shoveling chum and Jaws pops up for a visit.

Best Terrifying Performance Without using Special Effects: Hands down, it’s Reverend Cane from Poltergeist 2 when he walks over to the Freelings house and tries to get an invite in…”You’re all going to die in there!!!!!….good day…God is in, his hol-lee temmmmm-pulllllll”. Damn. Rest of the movie is just OK.

Best Crude Comedy No One Remembers: Porky’s. TELL me this isn’t one of the funniest scenes ever…

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GIcSuyZjjIM

I’d do more, but I’m tired….

MangoDaddy on March 16, 2009 at 12:04 AM

“I ate his liver with fava beans and a nice chianti.”

Was my favorite movie ever for a long time. It helps to have read Thomas Harris’s books.

baldilocks on March 16, 2009 at 12:32 AM

This is going to sound incredibly corny coming from a straight male, but one of my favorite films is “Somewhere in Time.” Knowing Christopher Reeve (it was shortly after his death) only for his role as Superman, I wanted to see some of his other films.

I don’t know why I enjoyed the film. Intellectually, the notion of traveling backward in time via the power of one’s mind is a stretch, to say the least. For the life of me, I cannot figure out the origin of the watch; it seems to be stuck in a time loop.

eaglescout1998 on March 16, 2009 at 12:46 AM

And Rocky is on the “worst” list why, exactly?

I mean, Crash I can understand, but Rocky?

Ryan Gandy on March 16, 2009 at 1:31 AM

The Godfather is retarded. The best, most realistic Mob movie of all time is GoodFellas.

LOL. I don’t know that I’d call the Godfather retarded — I thought the series was entertaining (at least the first two) — but GoodFellas is far and away the best mob movie evah IMO. And a much more realistic picture of what it was like to live “in the life.”

I can’t believe Shawshank didn’t make any of these lists. It is my very favorite movie of all time and I think it certainly merits at least a mention. Actually Morgan Freeman hardly ever does a bad movie, although Wanted was a rare exception to that.

Of those films represented on these lists, I’d have to choose Unforgiven and Schindler’s List as the best. I liked the Deer Hunter as well, but you really have to be in the mood for it and all of it’s ham-handed, liberal, anti-establishment rhetoric. It’s some good acting tho.

No Country for Old Men is probably the best movie I’ve seen recently. It is one that really sticks with you well after you’ve left the theater.

NoLeftTurn on March 16, 2009 at 1:41 AM

What was so bad about American Beauty that its one of the worst of all time?

thecountofincognito on March 16, 2009 at 3:34 AM

The 1936 version of The Last of the Mohicans starring Randoph Scott was the truest to the spirit of the book. Scott was a wonderful Hawkeye. He matched the sparse spare woodsman. The modern Mohicans, IMHO, stunk, but perhaps that is because I love Fenimore Cooper’s Great Tale so much. The old movie looked just like what I read in my mind

Similarly the old version of the Titanic sinking, A Night to Remember is far superior to the politically correct modern Titanic with it’s horrible sappy overplayed stereotypes of class system. I have watched the black and white version more times than I can count and find it simply wonderful for the way it marches you into the disaster. It is similar to watching Jaws, another excellent movie, that can be watched over and over because the presentation and timing are so good they cannot grow old, any more than a repeat ride on a roller coaster could ever become dull. The timing of A Night to Remember, and the low key deliveries make the inevitable much more excitiNG

Ben Hur will always be in my top ten. Mesmerizing The Ten Commandments is good, but Ben Hur is great.

The first Jaws is a classic. As I understand it, a lady editor is responsible for a serious chunk of Jaws success. She controlled the length of scenes, drawing out suspenseful moments perfectly using timing that others would never have considered. An unnamed genius.

The Godfather created an image of the mob that changed the mob’s own perception of itself. The timing (editing) was brilliant and drove the excitement of the story. The music created an aura of tragic romance that cast the mob as tragic heros. A major creation, unfortunately based upon a mixture of true events. The wedding was a depiction of a true wedding and unfortunately, art was imitating life.

Hollywood has created some great and wonderful movies, most of which are not on the list of insipid Oscar movies.

I part with my friends in not enjoying the Lord of the Rings at all. I like stories about Christ much more than stories about Christ figures. Rings is grey and slow which is a joy to Hobbit fans and extends their pleasures but excruciating to people like me who are bored by the story

Add to the list of films I have little regard for, Saving Private Ryan, Schindler’s List (documentaries blow away the pretentious list). I just realized I dislike most of the list. Oh well. I am not a star. Just a consumer

entagor on March 16, 2009 at 3:45 AM

Braveheart struck me as a movie put together by people who cared for accuracy. Before the invention of gunpowder, what would be the command for a group of archers to release their arrows? “Loose!” certainly is a better word than “Fire!” Although using “fire” instead of “loose” or “shoot” would not disqualify a best picture nominee, it shoud deserve an asterisk.

Pelayo on March 15, 2009 at 9:22 PM

Sorry, I loved BH but it is filled with goofs and historical inaccuracies. From the IMDB:

Incorrectly regarded as goofs: This is neither a biopic nor a historical documentary but is, rather, a romantic fiction inspired by true events. Many of the “real” characters and events have been deliberately reinterpreted to suit the story, as have some details of costume and custom.

This is my own. The entire premise of the Battle of Stirling in the movie is incorrect in the manner in which it was fought and won. The battle involved a narrow bridge that the British made the mistake of committing troops to one side of in too small a numbers to adequately present a superior force. Wallace took advantage of that and then advantage of their inability to retreat across the same bridge. In fact the correct title of the engagement is The Battle of Stirling “Bridge”.

Factual errors: King Edward II was almost certainly not gay or bisexual.

Factual errors: King Edward II was always bearded, even when Prince of Wales.

Audio/visual unsynchronized: A man is playing the Highland Pipes at William’s father’s funeral, but they sound like Uillean Pipes. This was a deliberate artistic decision because “they sounded better”.

Revealing mistakes: MacGregor is shown standing in the background at Murron’s funeral, but he doesn’t arrive in Wallace’s town until the next scene.

Anachronisms: When Wallace’s wife’s throat is cut, a white Ford Transit van can be seen briefly in the distance.

Anachronisms: After Wallace makes love to the future queen he rides off and is then part of a group riding down a long and winding road. Far off in the distance (at the bottom of the hill) a car or van can be seen moving towards the camera.

Factual errors: Wallace sleeps with the English princess, Isabella of France, however, at the time this film is set, Isabella was two years old according to many western civilization books. She was not in her teens or early twenties as depicted in the film.

Factual errors: Wallace and Edward I are seen dying at the same time, when in fact, Edward I died 2-3 years after Wallace.

Factual errors: Whenever pipes are heard in the movie, they are never Highland pipes. Highland pipes (characteristic of Scotland) are shown, but what are actually played are Uillean pipes which are Irish.

Factual errors: It is a widely accepted historical fact that woad (the blue face-paint Wallace and his men wear during battle scenes) was not used by Scottish warriors during the 13th century, but was in fact used much earlier by ancient Celtic warriors, and was obsolete by Wallace’s time.

Factual errors: Several costumes in the movie depict Scottish men wearing tartan and other checkered cloth. Tartan and such checkered cloths of this type did not begin to appear until 16th century, and were not worn in battle until the Battle of Culloden in the 1700s. It would not have been worn in the 13th century.

Errors in geography: The landscape in the opening credits and early scenes is the Western Highlands (specifically Glen Nevis) which look utterly unlike the Western Lowlands where Wallace grew up. Wallace never visited the Western Highlands.

Factual errors: At the funeral of Wallace’s father, the child Murron plucks a thistle, the symbol of Scotland, and gives it to the boy Wallace. This is both physically impossible (every species of thistle in the British Isles is so prickly and so tough-stemmed that you could only wrench one from its stem wearing protective gloves) and symbolically absurd (the toughness and prickliness of the thistle is its whole point as a symbol of Scottishness).

Factual errors: Wallace and many other Scottish characters ride horses while dressed in kilts. Even in times and places where the kilt was genuinely worn (it wasn’t worn anywhere in Scotland in Wallace’s time, and at no time in history was it worn in Wallace’s part of Scotland), men who expected to ride anywhere wore trews, not kilts, for the very good reason that it would have been an extremely painful and impractical experience; no underwear was ever worn under the kilt.

hawkdriver on March 16, 2009 at 3:53 AM

Comment pages: 1 2 3 4