The Man who Fell to Earth from the Sky
posted at 11:55 am on March 13, 2009 by Ed Morrissey
When critics of Obama administration policy speak to public skepticism, Obama apologists point to his approval numbers in various polls. One of those pollsters now says not to pay as much attention to the general approval number, but the motion in the underlying numbers. Douglas Schoen and Scott Rasmussen explain that Obama’s support has quickly declined to just his own party, and even that may be at risk:
It is simply wrong for commentators to continue to focus on President Barack Obama’s high levels of popularity, and to conclude that these are indicative of high levels of public confidence in the work of his administration. Indeed, a detailed look at recent survey data shows that the opposite is most likely true. The American people are coming to express increasingly significant doubts about his initiatives, and most likely support a different agenda and different policies from those that the Obama administration has advanced.
Polling data show that Mr. Obama’s approval rating is dropping and is below where George W. Bush was in an analogous period in 2001. Rasmussen Reports data shows that Mr. Obama’s net presidential approval rating — which is calculated by subtracting the number who strongly disapprove from the number who strongly approve — is just six, his lowest rating to date.
That number bounced upward a little to 9 in today’s tracking poll, but the trend has certainly been a sharp decline. When Obama took office in January, he had a 30-point gap in this measurement. The trend line for strong approval shows a shallow decline from the 40% level to the mid-30s, but the problem comes in the strong disapproval number. It has risen sharply from a honeymoon 10% to the low 30s, as independents peel away from Obama.
Rasmussen notes this as an indicator of a confidence drain:
Overall, Rasmussen Reports shows a 56%-43% approval, with a third strongly disapproving of the president’s performance. This is a substantial degree of polarization so early in the administration. Mr. Obama has lost virtually all of his Republican support and a good part of his Independent support, and the trend is decidedly negative.
The American people as a whole tends to give new administrations some time to find their footing, which is usually referred to as the “honeymoon” period. The polling shows that Obama has rapidly depleted that store of goodwill, and that voters have begun taking a hard look at the massive amounts of spending and government expansion, as well as the fumbling response to the financial crisis. Rasmussen notes that taxes have become a big concern, with most voters no longer buying the line that Obama can fund his programs merely by taxing the top 5% of earners. Over eighty percent — a hefty bipartisan majority — worry that the deficit spending Obama has proposed will make the situation worse, not better.
The top-line tracking poll measures whether people like Obama. In general, they still do — but the leading indicators show that they’re beginning to re-evalute his policies to the detriment of Obama and the Democrats helping him ram them through Congress.










Blowback
Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.
Trackbacks/Pings
Trackback URL
Comments
Comment pages: 1 2 3 4 Next »
So what? His poll numbers haven’t even stabilized yet. It’s not fair to cite this yet. I’d say 6 months would be reasonable.
RWLA on March 13, 2009 at 11:56 AM
Popularity.
Wasn’t Hitler popular with his people at one time?
Badger40 on March 13, 2009 at 11:57 AM
Saw Dick Morris yesterday; he predicted that Obama would fall below 50 by early summer.
Oh, and the markets are starting to tank again.
Norwegian on March 13, 2009 at 11:57 AM
/sings: “I’m freeeee! Free-falllllin’”
Vic on March 13, 2009 at 11:57 AM
So was Caballero.
PimFortuynsGhost on March 13, 2009 at 11:58 AM
the way he got elected(the MSM shilling, covering up, etc.) almost assures some sort of backlash
jp on March 13, 2009 at 11:58 AM
his approval will never get low like Bush. Who by the way has the lowest approval ratings ever in history
nice343 on March 13, 2009 at 11:58 AM
RWLA on March 13, 2009 at 11:56 AM
Fairness has nothing to do with it. When a president forces through so many policy’s that Barry has in the first 50 days he deserves to be judged quicker than usual. Fairness, bleah
Jack Daniels on March 13, 2009 at 11:59 AM
Well that’s a standard of excellence he can hope for.
Who cares about poll numbers in 3/2009, though. Come on.
lorien1973 on March 13, 2009 at 12:00 PM
Who, by the way, kept your whiny ass safe for eight years.
CDeb on March 13, 2009 at 12:00 PM
“See, uhhh, I — I — eh — Just one thing that, uhh, I was thinking about as I was, uhh, — as I was — getting off the, uhhh, copter ’cause, I — uhhh — you know, it was hard for me to believe you were entirely serious about that socialist question.” – Barack Obama (un-teleprompted)
kirkill on March 13, 2009 at 12:00 PM
His disapproval ratings are almost perfectly tracking Ronald Reagan’s approval ratings in the first 50 days!
He’s the anti-Christ!
jeff_from_mpls on March 13, 2009 at 12:00 PM
We do need more time before we start using polls as evidence from the public they don’t like the guy.
What does it matter anyway? This guy has another three years and ten months to F up the country. By then, it won’t really matter what his poll numbers are…
catmman on March 13, 2009 at 12:00 PM
After four years of Barry Lightworker, Jimmy Carter will seem like Abraham Lincoln by comparison.
Cicero43 on March 13, 2009 at 12:01 PM
nice343 on March 13, 2009 at 11:58 AM
The thread is not about Boooosh, Scooter. Please catch up.
The numbers starting to decline just shows that people are starting to realize that the water hitting the top of their heads is not rain. Rain has no color.
kingsjester on March 13, 2009 at 12:01 PM
Everyone of the people publicly criticizing him start off by saying how much they love the guy. They just don’t love what he is or is not doing.
Kind of like how a parent can love their kid even after the kid strangles the neighbor’s dog.
People are emotionally invested in him and that is going to be hard to reconcile with his failures.
myrenovations on March 13, 2009 at 12:01 PM
shocka – the apathetic peeps are waking up from their hypnotic trance, even b-4 the oceans recede
Ris4victory on March 13, 2009 at 12:02 PM
The sheeple are finally seeing what the MSM hid from them for an entire year… Barry is an incompetent empty suit who is highly mis-educated and who’s ideology is polar opposite of what is good for the country.
phreshone on March 13, 2009 at 12:02 PM
November ’08:
We’re not worthy!
We’re below your pay grade!
June ’09:
Throw the bum out!
jgapinoy on March 13, 2009 at 12:02 PM
Truman had numbers below bush, considered great today however because what the public hated him for he turned out to be right on
jp on March 13, 2009 at 12:03 PM
Give it time. Your boy will undoubtedly break that record.
Guardian on March 13, 2009 at 12:03 PM
RACIST!
eea on March 13, 2009 at 12:04 PM
Just wait until the food riots start.
Vashta.Nerada on March 13, 2009 at 12:04 PM
Give it Time. Obahmbo strives to break all records…high or low.
portlandon on March 13, 2009 at 12:04 PM
Ha! Once his “programs” start taking effect in two years, like cap & trade, and no one can afford to pay their utility bills, I’ll remember you saying this.
moonsbreath on March 13, 2009 at 12:05 PM
Obama doesn’t care. He will try to ram his agenda thru anyway possible.
Lest people forget, we are no longer a representative government. The people we elect have stopped representing our will, and instead work only for themselves and their agendas.
darwin on March 13, 2009 at 12:05 PM
Not fair? What the hell are you talking about?
You keep using this word “fair”. I don’t think it means what you think it means.
connertown on March 13, 2009 at 12:05 PM
Really? I don’t think so, but if you want to play that game, Bush’s ratings weren’t even near as low as the gutter-sphere of the Democrat Congress ratings. The lowest in history.
But anyway, if you rank success by these polls then you are the ignorant troll that I thought you were.
kirkill on March 13, 2009 at 12:05 PM
Just wait until the food riots start.
And the food STAMP riots will be worse!!!
RWLA on March 13, 2009 at 12:06 PM
You’re right it won’t … his guard dog media will lie about and distort every poll. The true number will never be revealed.
darwin on March 13, 2009 at 12:07 PM
Up-ding!! +1
Cicero43 on March 13, 2009 at 12:07 PM
Back to history class, nice moron. Carter had lower ratings, and we’ll talk about Obama’s ratings after his 4 year term ends; yes, he’ll serve one term.
Now we’ll call you a waaaaaambulance so that you’ll feel better.
Richard Romano on March 13, 2009 at 12:08 PM
Bush is the only thing a democrat can say
Tremmy on March 13, 2009 at 12:08 PM
Where is DTMH in this thread to tell us how biased Rasmussen is? Did he get enough of a drubbing in the last one with real facts to keep him away for the rest of the day?
Kelligan on March 13, 2009 at 12:09 PM
So,it means, that Hopey/Changeys numbers are actually
lower than they appear!!
canopfor on March 13, 2009 at 12:09 PM
his approval will never get low like Bush. Who by the way has the lowest approval ratings ever in history
nice343 on March 13, 2009 at 11:58 AM
What are the winning numbers for tomorrow’s Powerball lottery, I mean you are able to tell the future, right?
*eyes rolling so much they popped out of my head, fell on the floor and rolled under the desk*
This guy actually makes me miss Noneya.
Bishop on March 13, 2009 at 12:09 PM
Truman’s approval rating when leaving office: 23%
Don’t make idiotic statements with no proof.
By the way, Truman is considered a very good president now.
carbon_footprint on March 13, 2009 at 12:09 PM
In related news, the approval ratings for Obama’s teleprompter remain high.
Y-not on March 13, 2009 at 12:10 PM
Sarah Palin and Joe the Plumber said Obama was a socialist.
Obama-Media, 2008: Nah, that’s just fear-mongering from Republicans.
American Voters, 2009: OMG–we elected a socialist! What are we gonna DO?
Steve Z on March 13, 2009 at 12:12 PM
It’s a little early to break out the bubbly as the other polls are not in sync with Rasmussen.
MB4 on March 13, 2009 at 12:12 PM
Despite the delusions of the paid trolls here, this country does not want socialism. Why are some Democrat Senators suddenly balking at Cap and trade and Card Check?
And like others have said, people are slowly but surely getting wise to the media apologists.
jjshaka on March 13, 2009 at 12:12 PM
If we are on a honeymoon, who did we go to lower Slobovia?
notagool on March 13, 2009 at 12:13 PM
countdown ’till Barack joins the cast of Dancing with teh Stars in a lame effort at improving his polling #s
Fall season … mark my words
gatorboy on March 13, 2009 at 12:13 PM
The problem with popularity polling is how people respond to it. Reporters feel uncomfortable criticizing the policy proposals of a popular politician. Ditto other politicians.
They feel too comfortable criticizing the policy proposals of unpopular politicians.
A problem is created where a popular politician must be torn down so people feel comfortable criticizing his policies (witness Katrina reporting in retaliation for Iraq).
I wish everyone would keep in mind the Iraq war was a popular choice made by a popular politician. That obviously didn’t last.
The surge, on the other hand, was an unpopular choice made by an unpopular President.
In short, I’d love it if political popularity polls were outlawed.
MayBee on March 13, 2009 at 12:13 PM
Don’t make idiotic statements with no proof.
carbon_footprint on March 13, 2009 at 12:09 PM
But you don’t understand. That’s what Trolls do.
Famous assessment: The Economy’s not that bad. Barack Obama. Dow at 11:12 a.m. Down -46.60
kingsjester on March 13, 2009 at 12:13 PM
I don’t think it is any individual policy per se, but dems and reps in congress are realizing what an incompetent fool Barry is, and are planning to sideline him for the rest of his single term.
Vashta.Nerada on March 13, 2009 at 12:14 PM
You’re either with Obama, or you’re against Obama.
/lib
JohnJ on March 13, 2009 at 12:15 PM
Unless the Republicans take back the House in 2010 and Obama gets impeached.
Steve Z on March 13, 2009 at 12:15 PM
Wrong, just wrong. Need I say “Once again”.
Oldnuke on March 13, 2009 at 12:15 PM
nice343
lol Liberals cling to Bush’s poll numbers like a pacifier. One day, you’ll be a real boy!
Fish on March 13, 2009 at 12:16 PM
Mark to market rally.
Angry Dumbo on March 13, 2009 at 12:16 PM
OT, but I have a favor to ask of the readers here.
If you appreciate art, could you please click this link and vote 10 stars for this art? Afterward, you can browse more art from other new and breaking artists via the Saatchi Gallery.
My husband worked so hard on this piece, which is fiberglass and urethane interlocking modules, 30 pieces in all. The process is labor-intensive and takes a lot of time; it’s rather like making a surfboard.
The prize is a show with a prestigious gallery, and he is at a disadvantage, since whole art schools are spamming the vote.
Thank you, if you took the time to vote here.
chunderroad on March 13, 2009 at 12:17 PM
I don’t think it is any individual policy per se, but dems and reps in congress are realizing what an incompetent fool Barry is, and are planning to sideline him for the rest of his single term.
Vashta.Nerada on March 13, 2009 at 12:14 PM
Six of one, half dozen of the other. Ogabe is sidelined and we still get screwed by Congress.
Bishop on March 13, 2009 at 12:17 PM
So what? His poll numbers haven’t even stabilized yet. It’s not fair to cite this yet. I’d say 6 months would be reasonable.
RWLA on March 13, 2009 at 11:56 AM
Ya you hold out for fair,i’ll stick with reality.
heshtesh on March 13, 2009 at 12:18 PM
Too risky politically. Just make sure his policies do not get implemented and throw deficit reduction bills at him until we, hopefully, have the white house in 2012.
WashJeff on March 13, 2009 at 12:18 PM
News flash: world has resumed being partisan. Call me when the dems desert The One.
Trent1289 on March 13, 2009 at 12:18 PM
It’s okay to spend your political capital, but not if you don’t accomplish anything with it. So far, he’s just spending it to dig himself a deeper hole.
RBMN on March 13, 2009 at 12:19 PM
I just like to point out hypocrisy. When Bush’s approval rating was in the toilet. Hotair and freepers said approval ratings mean nothing, now that Obama’s numbers have dropped just a couple of single points it means something??
make up your minds HYPOCRITES
nice343 on March 13, 2009 at 12:20 PM
Well first of all, 100 days is the standard…but can we afford to wait 6 months.
This is the most disastrous transition ever made…more appointments have been denied, and resigned, and more on the way apparently, then ever in the history.
And the most incredible overlooked item, he had the most co-operative administration in the history helping him transition…now I see why, President Bush knew and was worried.
More corruption of tax evasion, fraud, illegal billing is surfacing…it isn’t going to get better.
Meanwhile, rest assured that he has convened a group of men everyday to concern themselves with radio talk show hosts…just where you want your presidents efforts to be focused on, a radio talk show host…unbelievable.
And for your buddy…
You are hoping that Obama hits what; 5% better then Bush? And that will make you feel good….HAHAHAHA!
Talk about setting the bar low…classic liberal, hoping for low expectations, and when reaching it, considers that a win.
right2bright on March 13, 2009 at 12:20 PM
My worry is he’s “peaking too soon” so to speak. Yes, the numbers will probably keep going down as Morris says, but they really need to be down in 2010 and 2012.
Gawd, I wish the clueless blind independents which supported him in droves would have paid attention and listened. Not that McCain would have been light years better, but at least we’d have Cuda waiting in the wings.
davek70 on March 13, 2009 at 12:20 PM
Not only did W not have the lowest ratings in history, ironically, he had the highest ratings ever recorded.
“President George W. Bush also holds the record high approval rating, over 93%.”
Fish on March 13, 2009 at 12:20 PM
True. But, given examples like the amnesty vote last year, at least we have a fighting chance to stop some of the crap. Since Barry thinks he is immaculate, nobody can change his mind.
Vashta.Nerada on March 13, 2009 at 12:20 PM
Love the Bowie references….
misslizzi on March 13, 2009 at 12:22 PM
A body hitting a ledge on the way to the pavement will bounce too.
Akzed on March 13, 2009 at 12:22 PM
Done. 10 stars.
carbon_footprint on March 13, 2009 at 12:22 PM
If he replaces Geithner, he’ll get a little poll bounce till reality sets back in. Hope will only carry you so far and increasing our indebtedness isn’t going to cure this mess. Obama owns all of this and just repainting the walls won’t fool Wall Street.
a capella on March 13, 2009 at 12:22 PM
But..but..but…Lego Obama had proven to solve all our problems!!
portlandon on March 13, 2009 at 12:23 PM
I always love to look at new art and went to the link. The module is very impressive and I cast my vote as a 10. Good luck!
sherry on March 13, 2009 at 12:24 PM
looks like its time to make another
FalseHope andPocketChange speech to reenergize the sheeple…alexraye on March 13, 2009 at 12:24 PM
The problem is Obama has never advanced because of his performance. He is obviously a smart man and was probably a smart boy. Therefore he was advanced without having to prove by himself by labor. That leaves him at a disadvantage to understand our market system and to think, falsely, it is possible for everyone to advance the way he has done.
Only a select group can be handed sucess the way he was and our economy survive. I only hope he can see this weakness in himself and do some studying to try and understand the tradeoff regular people in a market economy make to keep their own lives advancing and the greater economy advancing.
America cannot survive the false way of living life that Obama has learned from experience. This is more the way kings come to power than Presidents.
On the job training. Wow it has far more dimensions when talking about Obama lack of experience. Not just executive experience is lacking but general success versus failure and how that affects most of our decisions. Obama has been a spectator in life never a real participant. Then he just took the next advancement.
Never has anyone so inexperienced been given this much power. At least monacharies usally have bureaucrats that are constant and understand economies.
petunia on March 13, 2009 at 12:25 PM
Imagine waking up after the wedding and finding out that
Prince Charmingthe creature in bed with you is really just a frog with good PR… Let’s hope the MSM get their share of the blame as the spell breaks.RalphyBoy on March 13, 2009 at 12:25 PM
Isn’t a good part of the stimulus money being held for influencing those voters at that time?
a capella on March 13, 2009 at 12:25 PM
Yes, he does have the lowest in history. Why? Because Bush quickly took us down the socialism path. Obama is continuing Bush’s policies at even greater speed so why would/should his approval numbers be any different?
If there is any variance in numbers it only goes to show that there are other variables at play (media support or lack thereof, partisan thinking, and others). If people were truly looking only at the FACTS, they would have to come to the same conclusions for both men.
PrincipledPilgrim on March 13, 2009 at 12:26 PM
I also maintain that without the constant insanity and negative reporting that Bush’s final approval numbers would’ve been about 15% higher than they were.
The Big Lie and all that.
crazy_legs on March 13, 2009 at 12:26 PM
Yawn.
Now post a credible poll.
getalife on March 13, 2009 at 12:26 PM
Yes, but that is a great opportunity for the Republicans to campaign on a contract to quell most of the timed stimulus dollars.
carbon_footprint on March 13, 2009 at 12:27 PM
Schoen’s a Democratic pollster.
BuckeyeSam on March 13, 2009 at 12:27 PM
Better look again at what we said:
We were upset at his low numbers, brought on by his lack of veto over the dems spending (you do know that the dems controlled the spending didn’t you?), and we were upset at his lack of border protection…we also understood the low numbers for some of the mistakes in the war, but distressed that when the war “turned”, when we made the major breakthroughs that have brought us to where we are today (a place where your leaders said we would never, ever be), the MSM stopped reporting.
No, we weren’t happy about President Bush and some of his spending policies, and we understand how he got those low numbers.
We never stated they were wrong, we stated how to correct them.
Stop spending
Secure the borders
Better information on the winning war in Iraq
You lack of comprehension is not an excuse for your stupidity…but it is an excuse for buying into Obama, who is now leading the worst transition in history.
right2bright on March 13, 2009 at 12:27 PM
Alternate headline: “Republicans dream of Obama being unpopular.”
Jazz Shaw on March 13, 2009 at 12:28 PM
Voted. I wouldn’t normally vote 10 stars just because someone asked me to, but that piece deserved it – that is cool.
Vashta.Nerada on March 13, 2009 at 12:28 PM
Yawn.
Now post a credible poll.
getalife on March 13, 2009 at 12:26 PM
That was as predictable as Michelle ma belle be3ing on the cover of Oprah’s magazine…and just as credible.
kingsjester on March 13, 2009 at 12:28 PM
FIFY
crazy_legs on March 13, 2009 at 12:29 PM
BuckeyeSam on March 13, 2009 at 12:27 PM
Yeah, here is another one.
http://www.dailykos.com/weeklytrends
getalife on March 13, 2009 at 12:29 PM
Time to send Michelle out to show her bare upper arms on the cover of People, Time and Popular Mechanics!
Or move up the date of getting their new dog so they can get the “feel good family of the year” PR off that.
Even better, send “Sheriff” Joe Biden out to tell everyone how good a job his boss is doing.
albill on March 13, 2009 at 12:29 PM
Don’t you know it is not polite for ladies to yawn in public?
myrenovations on March 13, 2009 at 12:30 PM
getalife on March 13, 2009 at 12:29 PM
That’s Credible? Not coming for Daily Kos, it’s not.
kingsjester on March 13, 2009 at 12:31 PM
Good point, except that by when that $$ floods the market we’ll also have massive inflation. So maybe he rebounds a little bit in the short term, but I think the coming inflation will kill him like the Jimster. Oh but wait, I just remembered, he’ll just keep blaming Bush.
davek70 on March 13, 2009 at 12:31 PM
I don’t think that’s true, although I don’t feel like taking the time to look it up, just to argue with a troll. Somebody else will settle your hash on this anyway.
Plus, if you had any sense of history, you would know never to say never. You think the negatives of the Iraq War are the worst thing that could ever happen to a president? How about a 444 day hostage crisis? How about 15% interest rates on mortgages? How about 10% inflation? That’s a lot harder for your average Joe to live with than having to turn on the TV and listen to a drumbeat of negative coverage from a war, which, by the way, we won. If Obama really tanks this economy, devaluates the currency to the point where we end up with hyper-inflation, leaving NYC looking like Bagdhad, he’ll be lucky not to end up like Mussolini. And it could happen–so never say never.
What do you think another 9/11 would do this economy, giving what it did to the last one? Or maybe a failed state in Mexico–if the government there can’t get up on the drug-lords–with millions of Mexican refugees pouring across the southern border? Or another major oil shock, Straits of Hormuz closed following an exchange of tactical nukes betw Israel and Iran, giving us $8/gal gasoline prices? These are all things that could happen, and if they were to happen, Obama’s poll numbers would drop so low, he’d have to go to a deep well and fish them out with bucket.
You think Bush was a moron? How many months did it take him to staff his treasury department? Obambi can’t find his a$$ with both hands.
smellthecoffee on March 13, 2009 at 12:31 PM
kingsjester on March 13, 2009 at 12:31 PM
It is as credible as this poll.
getalife on March 13, 2009 at 12:32 PM
Wow, a DKos poll? Well that must be pretty legitimate.
carbon_footprint on March 13, 2009 at 12:32 PM
carbon_footprint on March 13, 2009 at 12:32 PM
As legitimate as this poll.
getalife on March 13, 2009 at 12:33 PM
Del Dolemonte on March 13, 2009 at 12:33 PM
They’re just haters.
It’ll be interesting to see how President Teleprompter responds to falling numbers and the (long-delayed) examination that will bring. He’s pretty thin-skinned so it’s easy to imagine him making a ginormous PR gaffe when he eventually goes off.
landshark on March 13, 2009 at 12:33 PM
Um, generally speaking, I agree with you. But Bush’s Trasury wasn’t fully staffed untilo August of his first year. And he initially chose that douchebag Paul O’Neil as his first Treasury Secretary, who spent all of his time hanging out with Bono in Africa.
myrenovations on March 13, 2009 at 12:35 PM
Sorry, sis, but Rasmussen was the most accurate pollster in the 2008 election cycle. Better have Carville fax you some better talking points, as he’s not getting his money’s worth out of you.
Or is he paying you in beer and bongs?
Del Dolemonte on March 13, 2009 at 12:35 PM
Yawn.
Check his numbers at the end of his second term, compare that to w and then judge him.
getalife on March 13, 2009 at 12:35 PM
And yeah, I totally should have “previewed” that last post…
myrenovations on March 13, 2009 at 12:36 PM
Perhaps you would agree, then, than polls are at best, useless, no matter where they come from.
Instead of focusing on polls, Congress & other politicians should seek out accurate information with which to base their decisions upon.
Badger40 on March 13, 2009 at 12:36 PM
Comment pages: 1 2 3 4 Next »