<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Steele reverses himself on choice</title>
	<atom:link href="http://hotair.com/archives/2009/03/12/steele-reverses-himself-on-choice/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/03/12/steele-reverses-himself-on-choice/</link>
	<description>The world’s first, full-service conservative Internet broadcast network</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2012 06:55:04 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Can we please impeach Michael Steele? Pretty please?- The Right Scoop</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/03/12/steele-reverses-himself-on-choice/comment-page-4/#comment-3441867</link>
		<dc:creator>Can we please impeach Michael Steele? Pretty please?- The Right Scoop</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Apr 2010 00:29:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=46574#comment-3441867</guid>
		<description>[...] the choice is. The individual choice rests in the states. Let them decide. March 12, 2009: Steele reverses himself on being [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] the choice is. The individual choice rests in the states. Let them decide. March 12, 2009: Steele reverses himself on being [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hot Air &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Video: Are you ready for President Steele?</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/03/12/steele-reverses-himself-on-choice/comment-page-4/#comment-2026090</link>
		<dc:creator>Hot Air &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Video: Are you ready for President Steele?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Mar 2009 00:05:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=46574#comment-2026090</guid>
		<description>[...] I kid. But I would like to know how a guy who&#8217;s now even more suspect on abortion than Mitt Romney plans to rally the Republican base to his side in a primary. His answer, [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] I kid. But I would like to know how a guy who&#8217;s now even more suspect on abortion than Mitt Romney plans to rally the Republican base to his side in a primary. His answer, [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Losing patience with Michael Steele &#124; conservativeintelligencer.com</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/03/12/steele-reverses-himself-on-choice/comment-page-4/#comment-1990010</link>
		<dc:creator>Losing patience with Michael Steele &#124; conservativeintelligencer.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Mar 2009 03:17:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=46574#comment-1990010</guid>
		<description>[...] Ed Morrissey has more over at Hot Air.   These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Ed Morrissey has more over at Hot Air.   These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jwesleybush.com &#124; Losing patience with Michael Steele</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/03/12/steele-reverses-himself-on-choice/comment-page-4/#comment-1985713</link>
		<dc:creator>jwesleybush.com &#124; Losing patience with Michael Steele</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Mar 2009 21:08:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=46574#comment-1985713</guid>
		<description>[...] Ed Morrissey has more over at Hot [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Ed Morrissey has more over at Hot [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jwesleybush.com &#124; Losing patience with Michael Steele - 34th Edition</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/03/12/steele-reverses-himself-on-choice/comment-page-4/#comment-1985654</link>
		<dc:creator>jwesleybush.com &#124; Losing patience with Michael Steele - 34th Edition</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Mar 2009 20:39:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=46574#comment-1985654</guid>
		<description>[...] Ed Morrissey has more over at Hot [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Ed Morrissey has more over at Hot [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jwesleybush.com &#124; Losing patience with Michael Steele - 21th Edition</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/03/12/steele-reverses-himself-on-choice/comment-page-4/#comment-1985639</link>
		<dc:creator>jwesleybush.com &#124; Losing patience with Michael Steele - 21th Edition</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Mar 2009 20:33:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=46574#comment-1985639</guid>
		<description>[...] Ed Morrissey has more over at Hot [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Ed Morrissey has more over at Hot [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jwesleybush.com &#124; Losing patience with Michael Steele - 8th Edition</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/03/12/steele-reverses-himself-on-choice/comment-page-4/#comment-1985606</link>
		<dc:creator>jwesleybush.com &#124; Losing patience with Michael Steele - 8th Edition</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Mar 2009 20:06:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=46574#comment-1985606</guid>
		<description>[...] Ed Morrissey has more over at Hot [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Ed Morrissey has more over at Hot [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hot Air &#187; Blog Archive &#187; NARN, The Biology 101 Edition!</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/03/12/steele-reverses-himself-on-choice/comment-page-4/#comment-1983652</link>
		<dc:creator>Hot Air &#187; Blog Archive &#187; NARN, The Biology 101 Edition!</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Mar 2009 19:59:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=46574#comment-1983652</guid>
		<description>[...] is now on indefinite leave, after failing to detect ghost employees at his old job. Michael Steele fumbled again this week, and we&#8217;ll explain how. Plus, which radical terrorist murderer will be returning to [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] is now on indefinite leave, after failing to detect ghost employees at his old job. Michael Steele fumbled again this week, and we&#8217;ll explain how. Plus, which radical terrorist murderer will be returning to [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Get off Steele’s Back! &#171; The TrogloPundit</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/03/12/steele-reverses-himself-on-choice/comment-page-4/#comment-1981942</link>
		<dc:creator>Get off Steele’s Back! &#171; The TrogloPundit</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Mar 2009 01:54:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=46574#comment-1981942</guid>
		<description>[...] Ed is similarly critical while wanting to be supportive. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Ed is similarly critical while wanting to be supportive. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: holygoat</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/03/12/steele-reverses-himself-on-choice/comment-page-4/#comment-1979316</link>
		<dc:creator>holygoat</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Mar 2009 14:34:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=46574#comment-1979316</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;

I’m a pro-choice conservative, and I don’t think I’m the only one. If for the only reason that you can make all abortions illegal and they will still happen. Look how well the Drug War is going for an example. We have enough government in our lives. On the other hand, I don’t think the government should be paying for them either…….

adamsmith on March 13, 2009 at 10:29 AM
&lt;/blockquote&gt;

I agree with all of this, but Steele looks like an idiot trying to play both sides of this fence. He needs to go, IMO, not because he voiced a pro-choice opinion, but that he didn&#039;t stand by it. I understand that most conservatives disagree with me about abortion -- although I agree with Steele&#039;s comment about Roe -- but for Christ&#039;s sake, take a position and stand by it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote>
<p>I’m a pro-choice conservative, and I don’t think I’m the only one. If for the only reason that you can make all abortions illegal and they will still happen. Look how well the Drug War is going for an example. We have enough government in our lives. On the other hand, I don’t think the government should be paying for them either…….</p>
<p>adamsmith on March 13, 2009 at 10:29 AM
</p></blockquote>
<p>I agree with all of this, but Steele looks like an idiot trying to play both sides of this fence. He needs to go, IMO, not because he voiced a pro-choice opinion, but that he didn&#8217;t stand by it. I understand that most conservatives disagree with me about abortion &#8212; although I agree with Steele&#8217;s comment about Roe &#8212; but for Christ&#8217;s sake, take a position and stand by it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: adamsmith</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/03/12/steele-reverses-himself-on-choice/comment-page-4/#comment-1979301</link>
		<dc:creator>adamsmith</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Mar 2009 14:29:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=46574#comment-1979301</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m a pro-choice conservative, and I don&#039;t think I&#039;m the only one. If for the only reason that you can make all abortions illegal and they will still happen. Look how well the Drug War is going for an example. We have enough government in our lives. On the other hand, I don&#039;t think the government should be paying for them either.......</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m a pro-choice conservative, and I don&#8217;t think I&#8217;m the only one. If for the only reason that you can make all abortions illegal and they will still happen. Look how well the Drug War is going for an example. We have enough government in our lives. On the other hand, I don&#8217;t think the government should be paying for them either&#8230;&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gaunilon</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/03/12/steele-reverses-himself-on-choice/comment-page-4/#comment-1979290</link>
		<dc:creator>Gaunilon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Mar 2009 14:27:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=46574#comment-1979290</guid>
		<description>If &quot;what is&quot; vs. &quot;what ought to be&quot; was the distinction he was trying to make then he should have, and would have, made it.

Get him out.  I nominate Mary Katherine Ham to replace him.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If &#8220;what is&#8221; vs. &#8220;what ought to be&#8221; was the distinction he was trying to make then he should have, and would have, made it.</p>
<p>Get him out.  I nominate Mary Katherine Ham to replace him.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chekote</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/03/12/steele-reverses-himself-on-choice/comment-page-4/#comment-1979166</link>
		<dc:creator>Chekote</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Mar 2009 13:50:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=46574#comment-1979166</guid>
		<description>The problem with Steele is that he constantly reverses himself. I am losing confidence in him too. I supported him because of his media savyness, communication skills. He clearly wants to move the party in a more moderate direction when it comes to social issues. I agree with that. But he has to stick to his positions. These 180s are really hurting him.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The problem with Steele is that he constantly reverses himself. I am losing confidence in him too. I supported him because of his media savyness, communication skills. He clearly wants to move the party in a more moderate direction when it comes to social issues. I agree with that. But he has to stick to his positions. These 180s are really hurting him.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Terrye</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/03/12/steele-reverses-himself-on-choice/comment-page-4/#comment-1978826</link>
		<dc:creator>Terrye</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Mar 2009 11:16:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=46574#comment-1978826</guid>
		<description>Oh come on people, you are nitpicking. I happen to agree with Steele. I think abortion should be decided by the states, just like a lot of other issues. I also think that while I myself do not support an abortion, it is obviously a choice women have.

This is getting ridiculous. We have a demagogue running the country and all conservatives can think to do is take endless pot shots at the RNC chairmen. No doubt they will run him off and start working on the next one.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh come on people, you are nitpicking. I happen to agree with Steele. I think abortion should be decided by the states, just like a lot of other issues. I also think that while I myself do not support an abortion, it is obviously a choice women have.</p>
<p>This is getting ridiculous. We have a demagogue running the country and all conservatives can think to do is take endless pot shots at the RNC chairmen. No doubt they will run him off and start working on the next one.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: willamettevalley</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/03/12/steele-reverses-himself-on-choice/comment-page-4/#comment-1978718</link>
		<dc:creator>willamettevalley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Mar 2009 07:04:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=46574#comment-1978718</guid>
		<description>I hate to say it, I really tend to dislike all the Republican infighting.  But after carefully watching Steele for the past month or two, I think it is time for him to go.  He has completely lost my confidence.  And it&#039;s not one specific case.  It is almost every time I see him on television.  He rarely makes a good strong conservative argument, and frequently says thing that make me go, &quot;Huh?!&quot;

For instance, in that GQ article, he acts like he is speaking positively oof Rush Limbaugh by saying, &quot;Rush is a friend. I like Rush. Rush is a bomb-thrower extraordinaire. And we need him. We need him because what he does is, he stimulates debate.&quot;

Or how about, &quot;And because you have a black man as president doesn’t mean that tomorrow morning a black business is not gonna get redlined or a black family’s gonna be able to get their house.&quot;

Or this one:  &quot;uh, you just can’t simply say, oh, like, “Tomorrow morning I’m gonna stop being gay.” It’s like saying, “Tomorrow morning I’m gonna stop being black.” &quot;

I could point to about 15 things in that one article that I strongly disagree with him on, where his answers implicitly agree with liberal positions.  He&#039;s trying to sound like them to win them over, but all he&#039;s doing is making it seem like he agrees with them.  How does that win them over in any way?!  He never makes the case!  He just says he&#039;s going to change things to make minorities see that he cares about them like the mean Republican party never has.  He goes out of his way to point out that there were only a handful of black faces at the Republican National Convention.  Never mind that the RNC has wide open arms tto minorities, but the main deterrent to blacks showing up is that they get ostracized within the black community.  

Instead of chastising the Republicans because there are not enough blacks there, why not speak directly to all blacks watching and say, &quot;Wade on in.  The water&#039;s warm.  I can vouch that the Republican party cares about blacks and has their arms wide open for all who care about strong families, opportunities to succeed, a choice on where to send your kids to school, etc.&quot;  Why not promote the party within the black community instead of constantly apologizing for it?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I hate to say it, I really tend to dislike all the Republican infighting.  But after carefully watching Steele for the past month or two, I think it is time for him to go.  He has completely lost my confidence.  And it&#8217;s not one specific case.  It is almost every time I see him on television.  He rarely makes a good strong conservative argument, and frequently says thing that make me go, &#8220;Huh?!&#8221;</p>
<p>For instance, in that GQ article, he acts like he is speaking positively oof Rush Limbaugh by saying, &#8220;Rush is a friend. I like Rush. Rush is a bomb-thrower extraordinaire. And we need him. We need him because what he does is, he stimulates debate.&#8221;</p>
<p>Or how about, &#8220;And because you have a black man as president doesn’t mean that tomorrow morning a black business is not gonna get redlined or a black family’s gonna be able to get their house.&#8221;</p>
<p>Or this one:  &#8220;uh, you just can’t simply say, oh, like, “Tomorrow morning I’m gonna stop being gay.” It’s like saying, “Tomorrow morning I’m gonna stop being black.” &#8221;</p>
<p>I could point to about 15 things in that one article that I strongly disagree with him on, where his answers implicitly agree with liberal positions.  He&#8217;s trying to sound like them to win them over, but all he&#8217;s doing is making it seem like he agrees with them.  How does that win them over in any way?!  He never makes the case!  He just says he&#8217;s going to change things to make minorities see that he cares about them like the mean Republican party never has.  He goes out of his way to point out that there were only a handful of black faces at the Republican National Convention.  Never mind that the RNC has wide open arms tto minorities, but the main deterrent to blacks showing up is that they get ostracized within the black community.  </p>
<p>Instead of chastising the Republicans because there are not enough blacks there, why not speak directly to all blacks watching and say, &#8220;Wade on in.  The water&#8217;s warm.  I can vouch that the Republican party cares about blacks and has their arms wide open for all who care about strong families, opportunities to succeed, a choice on where to send your kids to school, etc.&#8221;  Why not promote the party within the black community instead of constantly apologizing for it?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: profitsbeard</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/03/12/steele-reverses-himself-on-choice/comment-page-4/#comment-1978695</link>
		<dc:creator>profitsbeard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Mar 2009 06:26:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=46574#comment-1978695</guid>
		<description>Let Steele answer an easy question for a change:

&lt;em&gt;Should a lesbian woman, impregnated by a gay man&#039;s donated sperm, be allowed to have an abortion ~without the gay man&#039;s permission~ if he attends a Christian seminar on renouncing homosexuality and goes straight?&lt;/em&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Let Steele answer an easy question for a change:</p>
<p><em>Should a lesbian woman, impregnated by a gay man&#8217;s donated sperm, be allowed to have an abortion ~without the gay man&#8217;s permission~ if he attends a Christian seminar on renouncing homosexuality and goes straight?</em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: radiofreevillage</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/03/12/steele-reverses-himself-on-choice/comment-page-4/#comment-1978671</link>
		<dc:creator>radiofreevillage</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Mar 2009 05:37:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=46574#comment-1978671</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t know it this has been mentioned above. &lt;a href=&quot;http://andrewsullivan.theatlantic.com/the_daily_dish/2009/03/quote-for-th-15.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Apparently&lt;/a&gt;, Steele has two diametrically opposed positions on gay marriage/civil unions, too. 

Was he on drugs that day?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t know it this has been mentioned above. <a href="http://andrewsullivan.theatlantic.com/the_daily_dish/2009/03/quote-for-th-15.html" rel="nofollow">Apparently</a>, Steele has two diametrically opposed positions on gay marriage/civil unions, too. </p>
<p>Was he on drugs that day?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: radiofreevillage</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/03/12/steele-reverses-himself-on-choice/comment-page-4/#comment-1978564</link>
		<dc:creator>radiofreevillage</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Mar 2009 04:15:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=46574#comment-1978564</guid>
		<description>I have just noticed this. This is indeed pretty bad. I&#039;m pro-choice and anti-religion. But the realm of acceptable positions on this issue is really not singular. You gotta pick one and stick with it. 

&lt;blockquote&gt;The media needs to simply be told “none of your damn business, that has nothing to do with running a government”.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

When the Republican Party starts saying that, it&#039;ll be the dan of the new era. The problem is this is all they are running on.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have just noticed this. This is indeed pretty bad. I&#8217;m pro-choice and anti-religion. But the realm of acceptable positions on this issue is really not singular. You gotta pick one and stick with it. </p>
<blockquote><p>The media needs to simply be told “none of your damn business, that has nothing to do with running a government”.</p></blockquote>
<p>When the Republican Party starts saying that, it&#8217;ll be the dan of the new era. The problem is this is all they are running on.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: crosspatch</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/03/12/steele-reverses-himself-on-choice/comment-page-4/#comment-1978330</link>
		<dc:creator>crosspatch</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Mar 2009 02:48:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=46574#comment-1978330</guid>
		<description>This is what happens every time.  Understand that a good portion of the population of the US (and practically everyone under 30) views Republicans as some group of social tyrants who are going to go around stamping scarlet letters on people&#039;s heads and legislating morality.

And Republicans allow news media to draw them into those discussions.  The first thing out of a reporter&#039;s mouth when interviewing a Republican are going to be the standard issues .. homosexuality, abortion, etc.  The focus needs to be directed back to things like fiscal responsibility, taxes, trade issues, defense issues.  The media needs to simply be told &quot;none of your damn business, that has nothing to do with running a government&quot;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is what happens every time.  Understand that a good portion of the population of the US (and practically everyone under 30) views Republicans as some group of social tyrants who are going to go around stamping scarlet letters on people&#8217;s heads and legislating morality.</p>
<p>And Republicans allow news media to draw them into those discussions.  The first thing out of a reporter&#8217;s mouth when interviewing a Republican are going to be the standard issues .. homosexuality, abortion, etc.  The focus needs to be directed back to things like fiscal responsibility, taxes, trade issues, defense issues.  The media needs to simply be told &#8220;none of your damn business, that has nothing to do with running a government&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MadisonConservative</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/03/12/steele-reverses-himself-on-choice/comment-page-4/#comment-1978246</link>
		<dc:creator>MadisonConservative</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Mar 2009 02:26:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=46574#comment-1978246</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;Benny is too young to know what a Pinto is!

Knucklehead on March 12, 2009 at 7:46 PM&lt;/blockquote&gt;

So am I. Maybe I read too much.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Benny is too young to know what a Pinto is!</p>
<p>Knucklehead on March 12, 2009 at 7:46 PM</p></blockquote>
<p>So am I. Maybe I read too much.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jamson64</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/03/12/steele-reverses-himself-on-choice/comment-page-4/#comment-1978231</link>
		<dc:creator>Jamson64</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Mar 2009 02:22:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=46574#comment-1978231</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;

    Has Laura Bush been driving again???

    capitulus on March 12, 2009 at 4:16 PM

No, Ted Kennedy.

MadisonConservative on March 12, 2009 at 4:24 PM

    No, Ted Kennedy.

    MadisonConservative on March 12, 2009 at 4:24 PM

Ted’s more drive-off-the-bridge. Laura’s the real highway-carnage-maker.

capitulus on March 12, 2009 at 4:28 PM
&lt;/blockquote&gt;


Capitulus..how old was Laura B at the time? you dickwad she was a minor. so fuc+ yourself. How old was your boy Kennedy...you truly are an as+hole.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote>
<p>    Has Laura Bush been driving again???</p>
<p>    capitulus on March 12, 2009 at 4:16 PM</p>
<p>No, Ted Kennedy.</p>
<p>MadisonConservative on March 12, 2009 at 4:24 PM</p>
<p>    No, Ted Kennedy.</p>
<p>    MadisonConservative on March 12, 2009 at 4:24 PM</p>
<p>Ted’s more drive-off-the-bridge. Laura’s the real highway-carnage-maker.</p>
<p>capitulus on March 12, 2009 at 4:28 PM
</p></blockquote>
<p>Capitulus..how old was Laura B at the time? you dickwad she was a minor. so fuc+ yourself. How old was your boy Kennedy&#8230;you truly are an as+hole.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: crosspatch</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/03/12/steele-reverses-himself-on-choice/comment-page-4/#comment-1978212</link>
		<dc:creator>crosspatch</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Mar 2009 02:17:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=46574#comment-1978212</guid>
		<description>This is exactly why Republicans are never going to make it unless they can get their focus back on government issues and get off the moral agenda issues.  The interview should have gone like this to begin with:

Q: Do you think homosexuality is a choice?
A: That&#039;s none of your damned business and has nothing to do with governing a country.  Next question, please.

Q: Are you saying you think women have the right to choose abortion?
A: That&#039;s none of your damned business and has nothing to do with governing a country.

Q: Are you saying you don’t want to overturn Roe v. Wade?
A: Only the supreme court can overturn Roe V. Wade, not a political party. I am chairman of the republican Party.  Hey, lets talk economic and trade policy!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is exactly why Republicans are never going to make it unless they can get their focus back on government issues and get off the moral agenda issues.  The interview should have gone like this to begin with:</p>
<p>Q: Do you think homosexuality is a choice?<br />
A: That&#8217;s none of your damned business and has nothing to do with governing a country.  Next question, please.</p>
<p>Q: Are you saying you think women have the right to choose abortion?<br />
A: That&#8217;s none of your damned business and has nothing to do with governing a country.</p>
<p>Q: Are you saying you don’t want to overturn Roe v. Wade?<br />
A: Only the supreme court can overturn Roe V. Wade, not a political party. I am chairman of the republican Party.  Hey, lets talk economic and trade policy!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: OneGyT</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/03/12/steele-reverses-himself-on-choice/comment-page-4/#comment-1977733</link>
		<dc:creator>OneGyT</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Mar 2009 00:18:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=46574#comment-1977733</guid>
		<description>If I had a time machine I&#039;d go back and make sure we elect Blackwell instead. But since I don&#039;t have a time machine I guess I&#039;ll just have to wait it out.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If I had a time machine I&#8217;d go back and make sure we elect Blackwell instead. But since I don&#8217;t have a time machine I guess I&#8217;ll just have to wait it out.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: race42008.com &#187; Blog Archive &#187; More Steele Reaction</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/03/12/steele-reverses-himself-on-choice/comment-page-4/#comment-1977706</link>
		<dc:creator>race42008.com &#187; Blog Archive &#187; More Steele Reaction</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Mar 2009 00:14:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=46574#comment-1977706</guid>
		<description>[...] I was asked on a previous thread) works for neither Focus on the Family gives his view of Steele based on recent controversies: However, the problem with Steele isn’t the GQ interview.  It’s the fact that he can’t seem [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] I was asked on a previous thread) works for neither Focus on the Family gives his view of Steele based on recent controversies: However, the problem with Steele isn’t the GQ interview.  It’s the fact that he can’t seem [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: race42008.com &#187; Blog Archive &#187; More Steele Reaction</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/03/12/steele-reverses-himself-on-choice/comment-page-4/#comment-1977707</link>
		<dc:creator>race42008.com &#187; Blog Archive &#187; More Steele Reaction</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Mar 2009 00:14:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=46574#comment-1977707</guid>
		<description>[...] I was asked on a previous thread) works for neither Focus on the Family gives his view of Steele based on recent controversies: However, the problem with Steele isn’t the GQ interview.  It’s the fact that he can’t seem [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] I was asked on a previous thread) works for neither Focus on the Family gives his view of Steele based on recent controversies: However, the problem with Steele isn’t the GQ interview.  It’s the fact that he can’t seem [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
