Quote of the day
posted at 10:30 pm on March 11, 2009 by Allahpundit
Do you think homosexuality is a choice?
Oh, no. I don’t think I’ve ever really subscribed to that view, that you can turn it on and off like a water tap. Um, you know, I think that there’s a whole lot that goes into the makeup of an individual that, uh, you just can’t simply say, oh, like, “Tomorrow morning I’m gonna stop being gay.” It’s like saying, “Tomorrow morning I’m gonna stop being black.”
So your feeling would be that people are born one way or another.
I mean, I think that’s the prevailing view at this point, and I know that there’s some out there who think that you can absolutely make that choice. And maybe some people have. I don’t know, I can’t say. Until we can give a definitive answer one way or the other, I think we should respect that.
*
Explain that.
The choice issue cuts two ways. You can choose life, or you can choose abortion. You know, my mother chose life. So, you know, I think the power of the argument of choice boils down to stating a case for one or the other.
Are you saying you think women have the right to choose abortion?
Yeah. I mean, again, I think that’s an individual choice.
You do?
Yeah. Absolutely.
Are you saying you don’t want to overturn Roe v. Wade?
I think Roe v. Wade—as a legal matter, Roe v. Wade was a wrongly decided matter.
Okay, but if you overturn Roe v. Wade, how do women have the choice you just said they should have?
The states should make that choice. That’s what the choice is. The individual choice rests in the states. Let them decide.
*
So, Rush Limbaugh—good or bad for you guys?
Rush is a friend. I like Rush. Rush is a bomb-thrower extraordinaire. And we need him. We need him because what he does is, he stimulates debate. And I know it drives a lot of folks on the left loony. But so does Al Franken for us. Okay? So don’t give me, “Rush is a bad guy, we need to offset him.” You already have. You got Al Franken, for goodness sakes.
Blowback
Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.
Trackbacks/Pings
Trackback URL
Comments
Comment pages: « Previous 1 2 3 4 5 Next »
Upstate
Steele was the best of the people running. If people don’t get in the race, they don’t count.
Chekote on March 11, 2009 at 11:51 PM
I am staying out of this one other than to say Steele’s comments would mirror my own.
goat on March 11, 2009 at 11:52 PM
And We refers to what? Even if it was the majority of the population, does this mean the government should change the definition (or for that matter regulate marriage altogether)?
Upstater85 on March 11, 2009 at 11:52 PM
A man that has no God has no purpose.
-leetpriest
If you have no God, your life is worthless. Please end your purposeless life so that life with purpose can use the resources that your life is wasting.
leetpriest on March 11, 2009 at 11:52 PM
I will stand up and state that it is scientifically impossible for a newborn to comprehend what A, B, O and A/B blood types are, much less something as complex as RH factor, which therefore disproves the notion that people are born with blood.
MB4 on March 11, 2009 at 11:52 PM
Depression is classified as a mental disorder and so is insanity. What is your point?
You have heard of puberty, are you saying that is not genetic?
I am not bound by my religious beliefs to be unable to comprehend rational scientific thought like yourself.
Poptech on March 11, 2009 at 11:53 PM
LMAO.
I’m happy
I’m sad
I’m happy
I’m sad
I’m happy
I’m sa…..OMG check out the rack…
Medication time!
The Ugly American on March 11, 2009 at 11:54 PM
Upstate
We the people. Who knows maybe future generations will feel differently. I don’t support changing the definition of marriage. It will open a can of worms.
Chekote on March 11, 2009 at 11:54 PM
Again, we aren’t allowed to question Steele’s principles or views?
Upstater85 on March 11, 2009 at 11:54 PM
Obviously you cannot read. Please re-read my comments and at least attempt to comprehend that the point of my statement was to blast Steele for getting caught up in Obama, Carvelle, and Begala’s bag of tricks.
Dumbass.
leetpriest on March 11, 2009 at 11:54 PM
So says the merciful one.
Poptech on March 11, 2009 at 11:55 PM
Was that an initiaive to ban all abortion or to limit abortions? I saw a poll a while back on RCP that showed support for abortion plummet for late term abortions. I can’t believe anyone thinks partial birth abortion is okay.
Laura in Maryland on March 11, 2009 at 11:55 PM
Whenever people talk about making abortion illegal, I wonder how the laws would be enforced. How do you get around HIPA?
Chekote on March 11, 2009 at 11:57 PM
The fact is that there can be no purpose assigned to life unless one subscribes to some meta-physical reality. That’s just how it is. Crudely, this is an application of Goedel’s Incompleteness Theorem.
progressoverpeace on March 11, 2009 at 11:57 PM
I know Rush loves to knock “Country Club Republicans” but there are plenty of good solid Republicans who are in the Country Club circuit. For the most part, the rest of them are Democrats nowadays.
I loathe the class-envy this kind of thinking inspires, and I particularly regret the irrational animus directed towards Mitt.
Buy Danish on March 11, 2009 at 11:57 PM
Those thumpers are just filled to the brim with god’s love ain’t they?
ronsfi on March 11, 2009 at 11:58 PM
I like Juicy Fruit.
The Ugly American on March 11, 2009 at 11:59 PM
Please explain Bisexuality if it is not a choice.
YoungAmerican on March 12, 2009 at 12:00 AM
An RNC leaderhip thread, abortion thread and homosexuality thread all in one.
Allah is the master.
SouthernDem on March 12, 2009 at 12:00 AM
What if you consider the purpose unknown? Or “purpose” as merely a way for the human mind to cope with not knowing.
Poptech on March 12, 2009 at 12:01 AM
POP: This is pretty well put.
I’m not convinced of a gay gene. And I’m unwilling to accept that homosexuality is the equivalent of race or gender. For me, the thought of the act is positively revolting. Further, the act is anatomically unnatural because the pieces just aren’t being used for their intended purpose.
More than anything else, POP, I’m flatly against efforts to legitimize it. Homosexuality shouldn’t be persecuted, but it shouldn’t be celebrated. Contrary to what Obama thinks, I don’t regard it as a suitable subject in school until high school. By that age, given the saturation of society with sex, it’s hard to expect that the subject wouldn’t come up. Still, creating entire courses devoted to the gay lifestyle and to the contributions of gays in society and so forth–spare me. At most, I think I’d limit discussion to two sentences in a high school health class. Period.
BuckeyeSam on March 12, 2009 at 12:01 AM
Laura
In Colorado, the Human Life from the Moment of Conception was defeated by a stunning margin of 73% to 27%. The measure called for the definition the term “person” to include “any human being from the moment of fertilization. This is basically the same language as the pro-life plank in the GOP platform. McCain got 45% of the vote in Colorado which means that many GOP voters also rejected the initiative. In South Dakota, the ballot initiative called for a ban on all abortions in the state except in cases where mother’s life or health is at risk or in cases of rape or incest for pregnancies of less than 20 weeks. It failed 55% to 45%.
Chekote on March 12, 2009 at 12:02 AM
Steel is rather like zero, lot of talk about what he thinks
about everything and does nothing to promote the welfare of the party. The more he talks, the less he says.
dragondrop on March 12, 2009 at 12:02 AM
Depression does not effect newborns, nor does insanity (unclassified as you have written it). What’s YOUR point?
The onset of puberty is caused by a rise in hormones. If you’re comparing homosexuality to puberty, what hormone sets homosexuality in motion? If homosexuality is genetic, what specific genes does it affect?
Please enlighten me, your kind has never been able to prove this since you started your wasteful and inconclusive studies.
If you were truly able to comprehend rational scientific thought, you would require the burden of proof to exist.
Friend, as a network engineer, I am a scientist. More logic passes my brain in a day than does yours in a year.
leetpriest on March 12, 2009 at 12:02 AM
It makes me want to quote scripture.
Poptech on March 12, 2009 at 12:02 AM
Country clubs are not the problem. Exclusionary country clubs are the problem.
Chekote on March 12, 2009 at 12:03 AM
I see your reasoning, and I agree that you crudely applied Gödel’s Theorem. Essentially Positivism has its flaws.
Upstater85 on March 12, 2009 at 12:03 AM
Behold the tolerance of Atheists and Homosexuals.
leetpriest on March 12, 2009 at 12:04 AM
There only two kinds of men: the righteous, who believe themselves sinners; the rest, sinners, who believe themselves righteous.
- Blaise Pascal
AZ_Redneck on March 12, 2009 at 12:04 AM
The existence of a genetic disorder does not eliminate free will.
Poptech on March 12, 2009 at 12:04 AM
Steele is out of his league. Comparing Rush to Franken?
Franken is always wrong and is crazy. Rush is mostly correct and very sane.
Time for you to go away Steele.
csdeven on March 12, 2009 at 12:04 AM
Yes, when Gottlieb Daimler (or whomever it was) invented the automobile he didn’t call it a Ship as the name for that mode of transportation was already taken and when the Wright Bros. invented a flying machine they didn’t call it an automobile as the name for that mode of transportation was already taken, so likewise Gays need to come up with another name for their mode of sex, maybe gayiage or civil union or something!
MB4 on March 12, 2009 at 12:05 AM
must have made you think, perhaps doubt.
AZ_Redneck on March 12, 2009 at 12:05 AM
Who told you I was merciful. Apply some of your scientific reasoning here. Life without purpose is waste. Not a difficult concept to grasp.
leetpriest on March 12, 2009 at 12:05 AM
No problem, but the “purpose” itself cannot reside within the system. At least not by the the methods of reasoning we currently use.
This may well be true, but then there is no purpose, just an attempt to create one in order to motivate oneself to do something. This is a purposeless existence. There’s nothing inherently wrong with it, but I cannot accept it as being true (I have a firm need for a purpose to life, for my own mind), and it will almost surely lead to a society that destroys itself (as most purposeless quests usually lead to destruction, in the end).
progressoverpeace on March 12, 2009 at 12:06 AM
Oh yeah. Totally comparable to wishing people to off themselves for being a waste of resources. What are you all of 12? So young for so much bigotry.
ronsfi on March 12, 2009 at 12:07 AM
Nor does it guarantee it. Retake your science classes.
leetpriest on March 12, 2009 at 12:08 AM
The default answer for a lack of response. Begone, you’re finished after 1 round.
leetpriest on March 12, 2009 at 12:09 AM
That sounds about right to me.
progressoverpeace on March 12, 2009 at 12:09 AM
Re: genes, there’s not only genetics, but the in utero environment that probably impacts sexuality.
The society has a right not to be bullied by judges into having gay marriage (IMHO), but I think it is fair to ask for some legal remedy for gays who want a legal partnership (basically Steele’s position)
r keller on March 12, 2009 at 12:10 AM
Why are you unconvinced of the scientific possibility? How many medical conditions are known?
Homosexuality is clearly not normal sexual behavior as the act of reproduction is clear.
I completely agree that it should not be legitimized as normal behavior but regarded as a disorder, scientifically studied and evaluated. And (gasp) looked at for a cure like any other medical condition.
Poptech on March 12, 2009 at 12:11 AM
Yes we’re all devastated by your towering intellect no doubt gained while retaking your “Science Classes”. Troll. Blech.
ronsfi on March 12, 2009 at 12:11 AM
ROFLMAO, I’m not gay.
Poptech on March 12, 2009 at 12:12 AM
Mr. Scientist aka Network Engineer
http://www.princetonreview.com/Careers.aspx?cid=205
I guess humility didn’t make it into your scripture teachings.
Anyone who tells another human being to end their life because it has no purpose is not a Christian.
budfox on March 12, 2009 at 12:13 AM
There a ton of ex-homosexuals running around that all say it’s a choice. They know something that the pop culture doesn’t.
Mojave Mark on March 12, 2009 at 12:14 AM
I sense massive over compensation. Must be a closet case. Denial. Tragic really.
ronsfi on March 12, 2009 at 12:14 AM
Steele morphs into tin.
Becoming his own foil.
profitsbeard on March 12, 2009 at 12:15 AM
A child cannot be depressed? Hormones are not genetic?
Since I am a computer scientist who fixes problems caused by network engineers who do not know what they are doing, that must make me a logic machine.
Poptech on March 12, 2009 at 12:15 AM
Spank, me, DADDY!
SouthernGent on March 12, 2009 at 12:16 AM
Yet I’m intolerant? I simply think they shouldn’t be allowed to invade the sanctity of marriage, yet you, you’d like to see them wiped out and restrict their freedom by controlling their sexual behavior. Pretty f***ed up if you ask me.
By the way, science boy, you still didn’t specify which genes are the “gay genes” or which hormones set homosexuality in motion. Your credibility is dying.
Nighty night.
leetpriest on March 12, 2009 at 12:16 AM
.
I’m sure it speeds right past. LOL!
ronsfi on March 12, 2009 at 12:17 AM
Turning to Obama…now that he has unleashed unlimited Science to play around with embryos, we can speculate on the future of finding a gay gene, so that future parents can abort it.
So, the logical stance of a progressive has to be, that yes, you can abort your fetus, unless it is gay, in which case you will have to save up a dowry for the marriage.
(btw, not Steele’s position)
r keller on March 12, 2009 at 12:18 AM
Thanks.
*sigh*
Laura in Maryland on March 12, 2009 at 12:19 AM
A man who is that mentally enslaved has no intellectual purpose. If there be a God, He really goofed up.
Maybe Thor is my God.
That kind of thinking is quite similar to that of Hitler, Stalin and Pol Pot.
MB4 on March 12, 2009 at 12:19 AM
I am choosing not to have sex with men (celibate for 11 months). I am still gay, but the choice was mine not to have sex. Speaking soley from experience, I suspect that is what is going on with “ex-gays”. There’s absolutely nothing wrong with that, but it’s not “a cure” for teh gays.
SouthernGent on March 12, 2009 at 12:19 AM
Rather than doing these ridiculous interviews, why doesn’t Steele actually get serious about approaching the block black vote?
Why hasn’t Steele invited Thomas Sowell, Walter Williams, Star Parker, Larry Elder, Ken Blackwell, and any other conservative blacks to a week or weekend panel discussion attended by conservatives (maybe the press) in order to discuss ways of making inroads into the black vote.
Frankly, I feel sorry for blacks because Dems talk a good game, but I think they’ve created an approach to life that enslaves blacks. The only blacks who benefit from Democratic policies are the poverty merchants all around the country who pass themselves off as leaders, but they really do little to improve the lives of blacks.
Steele needs to study the history each party’s treatment of blacks–and then get the word out.
BuckeyeSam on March 12, 2009 at 12:19 AM
Of course it could, it could just be unknown.
You could consider your purpose to seek the true purpose? Or just accept you do not know and hope to find out. I have no problem accepting that I do not know. If society accepts they do not know but wishes to find out, it benefits society to remain intact to reach that end.
Poptech on March 12, 2009 at 12:20 AM
Exactly the reason I’m not for murdering babies.
SouthernGent on March 12, 2009 at 12:23 AM
Oh really? Tell me, logic machine, if you had a network using the OSPF Routing protocol containing a mixture of Cisco, Foundry, and DLink devices, as well as a network using EIGRP with the same mixture of brands, what would be the best routing protocol to use between the two networks.?
You have 5 minutes to answer before your credibility is thrown out the window.
leetpriest on March 12, 2009 at 12:23 AM
Celibate for 11 months! I didn’t know you were married. Congrats.
Laura in Maryland on March 12, 2009 at 12:23 AM
Actual bisexuality (equal amounts attraction to men and women) probably doesn’t exist. People who act “bisexually” are likely just very, shall we say, liberated.
WisCon on March 12, 2009 at 12:24 AM
Seems to me that Steele talks out of the side of his mouth that he thinks his listener wants to hear. He is getting played. Wish he’d stay off the interview circuit and get something done. Seems to me this isn’t helping.
Christian Conservative on March 12, 2009 at 12:24 AM
…or perhaps experiementing with their homosexual feelings, but not quite ready to admit that they are gay?
Laura in Maryland on March 12, 2009 at 12:27 AM
One thing is for sure, if Christ comes back to Earth he certainly will not become a member of your congregation. Mohammad would fit in pretty well however.
Tav on March 12, 2009 at 12:28 AM
Heh! :-D
SouthernGent on March 12, 2009 at 12:28 AM
D’oh! It is way past my bedtime.
Laura in Maryland on March 12, 2009 at 12:29 AM
I usually frame the argument in an even simpler way, as it comes down to the difference between those who believe in the existence of a physical (meta-physical, if need be) infinity versus the finitists. Another crude approximation … though I think it goes right to the heart of the matter.
progressoverpeace on March 12, 2009 at 12:29 AM
teh gay- light is both a particle and a wave.
.
abortion- the only way to get regular people upset enough to limit it is to make it (temporarily) legal to abort a child from conception to puberty.
.
states rights- time to dissolve the union and start over.
.
atheists- light is both a particle and a wave.
AZCON on March 12, 2009 at 12:30 AM
I’m unwilling to consider it an immutable characteristic as race and gender are. I see gays as distinguished by their behavior–what they do–rather than by skin color or genitals. The have every right to do as they wish in the privacy of their homes. But I won’t celebrate it by, say, putting a homosexual relationship on par with heterosexual marriage.
BuckeyeSam on March 12, 2009 at 12:30 AM
Life is a question in the form of an answer.
Tav on March 12, 2009 at 12:31 AM
I think that same-sex marriage would cease to be an issue when state governments get out of the business of issuing marriage licenses. Can anyone cite any reason for the marriage license other than the revenue the government gets from marriage license fees?
eaglescout1998 on March 12, 2009 at 12:32 AM
There are lots of issues involving insurance, inheritance, tax deductions, adoption, and legal decision-making (such as medical care).
Laura in Maryland on March 12, 2009 at 12:35 AM
Okay, now he has to go. Up until now I thought people might have been jumping the gun on calling for his ouster but this just proves that Steele is no more qualified to run the RNC than Obama is qualified to be an IL state senator.
thegreatbeast on March 12, 2009 at 12:35 AM
Since you haven’t answered, allow me to help you, oh great “general field computer scientist that’s probably some desktop pc tech junkie with just an A+ because he didn’t know what the hell he wanted to do in school and wasn’t smart enough to keep up with the network engineers”.
It’s a double trick question. EIGRP is Cisco proprietary, and therefore cannot be configured on Foundry or DLink (as if either had decent enough equipment to hold that much info in the route tables begin with). 2nd off, there is no best protocol, a static route will do, redistribute the statics on the ABR.
You’re no computer scientist, Poptech (at least not a noteworthy one). You’re just some dipshit troll that couldn’t even hope to come close to passing a CCNA, definitely not a CCNP, or so much as being able to comprehend network architecture my level.
Good night, “computer scientist”. What a joke.
leetpriest on March 12, 2009 at 12:36 AM
Most atheists and homosexuals as well as most Christians and Jews have little tolerance for Hitler types, which is what you clearly are as you so clearly demonstrated when you commented earlier.
You are one sick person.
Tav on March 12, 2009 at 12:37 AM
It might benefit such a society to remain intact until they find out, but I think it’s more likely that society would lose interest and dissolve, first. And without knowing, or having an inkling of, this purpose, there is nothing to direct what is good and what is bad. The Golden Rule (and its contrapositive) fall short in these respects, without any greater backing behind them. Without any purpose, everything is acceptable. Societies might exist with such an attitude for some time, but I don’t think they would make it very far. That’s just a judgment call on my part, of course.
progressoverpeace on March 12, 2009 at 12:37 AM
I think there may be a born inclination to homosexuality as there is to many things such a becoming addicted to things, even violence and other human frailties.
But there is always a choice.
And in our society today there is learned sexual behavior of all types. I’m sure in past centuries people lived sexually fulfilled lives without wide spread pornography for instance. I’m absolutely certain that many people who identify themselves as homosexual or bi-sexual would have been happy in past times not knowing that about themselves.
I don’t know if that is “choice” or “learned” or “genetic”. I think some cultures in the past were very nearly entirely bi-sexual. I think that had to be social conditioning as to what was appropriate sexual behavior and what wasn’t.
But this is our society, our traditions, our families, someone will win the arguement over gay marriage. And many will be unhappy. But that is social conditioning too.
So condition yourself to be happy with civil unions and condition yourself to respect other people’s beliefs. Stop trying to force people to accept you. I can respect you as a fellow sojourner on this planet and respect you without having to condone your life style. You cannot control my mind and I can’t control yours. So stop trying. I don’t try to force you to believe like me.
Religous people have made concession after consession to the “if it feels good do it” crowd. But that crowd never never never gets enough consessions to feel satisfied.
petunia on March 12, 2009 at 12:39 AM
So suggesting finding a cure for a genetic condition is intolerance? I made no claims of whiping anyone out or controlling anyone. Finding a cure does not of that.
The scientific evidence exists:
Genetic regions influencing male sexual orientation identified (University Of Illinois At Chicago)
Poptech on March 12, 2009 at 12:39 AM
Pitching………
…………. or Catching?
Seven Percent Solution on March 12, 2009 at 12:41 AM
Didn’t SaintOlaf get banned? If so maybe he came back as leetpriest with even more of Satan in him.
HalJordan on March 12, 2009 at 12:41 AM
A man can do as he wills, but not will as he wills. Everybody acts not only under external compulsion but also in accordance with inner necessity.
- Schopenhauer
MB4 on March 12, 2009 at 12:43 AM
I don’t think so. Leet’s writing seems rather feminine (I was thinking nonya?)
Laura in Maryland on March 12, 2009 at 12:43 AM
I think I have been on when both have posted. But there are some others that would be good canidates for SaintOlaf. I didn’t know he was banned. But he was really annoying. He was going to be a very loney man in Heaven all by himself.
petunia on March 12, 2009 at 12:45 AM
Does anyone else get the feeling that Steele should be doing something other than giving television and magazine interviews?
Where’s the message?
Kini on March 12, 2009 at 12:46 AM
I’VE GOT IT! Leet is actually…
Laura in Maryland on March 12, 2009 at 12:47 AM
Because like a lot of people on the left, he’s a racist. If you’re Republican and black, he has absolutely no problem using race to demean you. Obama, though, well that’s different.
capitalist piglet on March 12, 2009 at 12:48 AM
Steele needs to take a break from interviews. Go back to his office and work on organizational matters. In any case, he needs to stop talking to POLITICO. Those people are out to get him.
Chekote on March 12, 2009 at 12:48 AM
HalJordan on March 12, 2009 at 12:41 AM
I’VE GOT IT! Leet is actually…
http://www.latenightwithjimmyfallon.com/video/clips/nick-burns/858401/
dang that preview button!
Laura in Maryland on March 12, 2009 at 12:49 AM
After re-viewing the Ari Fleisher/Chris Matthews interview, Ari should be sent to every interview Steele has accepted in the future, or take his place period.
Marcus on March 12, 2009 at 12:49 AM
In any case, Laura, there is something terribly wrong with him or her. If I can find my little green ring I will take him or her apart molecule by molecule and then put him or her back together again and maybe I put him or her back together right and maybe I don’t.
HalJordan on March 12, 2009 at 12:50 AM
Amazing. Not a single word that is off-base.
radiofreevillage on March 12, 2009 at 12:51 AM
I think most politicians are doing too much preening for the cameras these days and not enough figuring out good solid financial decisions to forestall disaster. (STOP THE MINDLESS SPENDING SPREE!!!! AND DID YOU REALLY THINK YOU COULD SOLVE THIS BY BUYING EVERY PROJECT THAT EVER CAME ACCROSS YOUR DESK?)
It really is like the band playing while the Titanic sinks. Only lucky us we get to hear politicians drone on and on. I prefer violins.
petunia on March 12, 2009 at 12:53 AM
St. O went on an antisemetic diatribe, Ed and AP confered, and then he got BANNED! We get a lot of rope, but St. O went all Hitlery, good riddance.
Laura in Maryland on March 12, 2009 at 12:53 AM
You have one life, let it be gay
Shouldn’t one do as one’s told to?
No, let the moment enfold you
Grab up your one golden chance
Darlings, life is such romance
Give this world a sweeping glance
Let it set your soul a-dancing night and day
Vivez!
Live, here’s to life, let us be gay
Let go of each inhibition
No one need give you permission
What are you waiting for?
Vivez!
PercyB on March 12, 2009 at 12:55 AM
I really liked Steele before he got the job and it seemed that he was the guy everyone here at HOTAIR wanted to get the job but since he became the chairman he has failed. That said he needs time and should be given time, we can’t let the liberal media win by dividing the GOP.
lavell12 on March 12, 2009 at 12:56 AM
LOL!
Laura in Maryland on March 12, 2009 at 12:56 AM
I’m an Evangelical, and yet I feel that the determination of the beginning of life should reside with science, not the state.
Science states that when a human sperm combines with a human egg, it creates a living organism in the beginning stage of human life.
We know when human life begins. However, some don’t wish to acknowledge it because that would mean that their desire to kill human life would carry consequences… so they play stupid, like this is an unknowable thing.
dominigan on March 12, 2009 at 1:00 AM
Oh my! I used to kinda get a kick out of seeing how crazy we all could make him sound… Thank goodness for the safety of anonymos posting… wouldn’t want to meet him in real life.
petunia on March 12, 2009 at 1:03 AM
Mercy, Percy! That was lovely. I thought I knew my showtunes, but I had to look that one up. How appropriate on so many levels;)
Laura in Maryland on March 12, 2009 at 1:05 AM
Comment pages: « Previous 1 2 3 4 5 Next »