Fineman: Washington Establishment concluding Obama in over his head

posted at 8:53 am on March 11, 2009 by Ed Morrissey

Newsweek has transformed itself over the past two years into the cheerleading section of the media Obamabots, but Howard Fineman throws a little cold water on the Age of Obama.  The meme of the Greatest Transition Evah has faded away as Barack Obama stumbles from crisis to crisis, and not just in finance.  The impression of incompetence has started to spread, and while his approval numbers still remain average, the DC establishment has begun to lose confidence in him.

Even as he delivers the bad news, Fineman still sounds like an apologist:

Surfer that he is, President Obama should know a riptide when he’s in one. The center usually is the safest, most productive place in politics, but perhaps not now, not in a once-in-a-century economic crisis.

Swimming in the middle, he’s denounced as a socialist by conservatives, criticized as a polite accommodationist by government-is-the-answer liberals, and increasingly, dismissed as being in over his head by technocrats.

Luckily for Obama, the public still likes and trusts him, at least judging by the latest polls, including NEWSWEEK’s.But, in ways both large and small, what’s left of the American establishment is taking his measure and, with surprising swiftness, they are finding him lacking.

They have some reasons to be concerned. I trace them to a central trait of the president’s character: he’s not really an in-your-face guy. By recent standards—and that includes Bill Clinton as well as George Bush—Obama for the most part is seeking to govern from the left, looking to solidify and rely on his own party more than woo Republicans. And yet he is by temperament judicious, even judicial. He’d have made a fine judge. But we don’t need a judge. We need a blunt-spoken coach.

So he’s “swimming in the middle” while “seeking to govern from the left”?  No wonder people have trouble with his competence.  I’m not even sure how Fineman bases his “swimming in the middle” assessment on policy or tone.  He’s allowed Nancy Pelosi to lock Republicans out of the legislative process on Porkulus and the omnibus spending bill, tacitly allowed Congress to pass the pork-filled omnibus spending plan, and has rolled out a half-baked plan to vastly grow government over the next ten years as a supposed economic stimulus.

That’s only swimming in the middle if you write for Newsweek, or Mother Jones.

People find him lacking because he keeps failing on tasks large and small.  Three Cabinet appointments have gone under in less than two months, as have other senior staff assignments.  He promised an economic plan from Tim Geithner during his first press conference, only to have Geithner appear the next day and say that the dog ate his homework.  The administration has still failed to roll out the details of TARP II, the auto bailouts, and the full plans for the mortgage relief plan, despite multiple promises to deliver them.  His failure to understand protocol during Gordon Brown’s visit embarrassed the US and the Washington establishment, which knew full well how insultingly Obama treated the British Prime Minister.

And what does Fineman write about?  What a judicious guy Obama is, and that that’s the problem.

Blowback

Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.

Trackbacks/Pings

Trackback URL

Comments

Comment pages: 1 2 3

Fineman better hurry up and get on the train. It is headed downhill and picking up steam!!!!

Dire Straits on March 11, 2009 at 9:04 AM

Not to be nit-picky but, remember, it’s a BUS and Fineman will be thrown under it in 5…4…3…2…1…

Jarhead68 on March 11, 2009 at 9:42 AM

Swimming in the middle.

Drowning on the left.

fogw on March 11, 2009 at 9:42 AM

Roosevelt has been on the dime since 1946. At that rate we will all be stuck with Barry on the quarter until at least 2072.

Limerick on March 11, 2009 at 9:40 AM

I think you mean the three dollar bill, not the quarter. LOL.

Jarhead68 on March 11, 2009 at 9:43 AM

Clever, those establishment folks. Only took them two years to figure out what I did during his hat in the ring speech.

Vashta.Nerada on March 11, 2009 at 9:44 AM

Camille Paglia, Heads Should Roll, Agrees with Rush about Feminazis and so do I.

Dr Evil on March 11, 2009 at 9:45 AM

Yes – he is “Baracking the Economy”

izoneguy on March 11, 2009 at 9:35 AM

The greatest wealth destruction of our lifetime… compliments of The Obamanator.

petefrt on March 11, 2009 at 9:45 AM

We need to print 3 dollar bills with his face on it.

The only destruction Obama has passion for and we do not have today is inflation. If we have recovery, his methodologies will guarantee the most severe inflation we have had in a century.

seven on March 11, 2009 at 9:47 AM

Yes, I cringe when Rush plays his “Barack the Magic Negro” satire or when he gratuitously racializes the debate over Philadelphia Eagles quarterback Donovan McNabb, who is a constant subject of withering scrutiny for quite different reasons on sports shows here in Philadelphia. On the other hand, I totally agree with Rush about “feminazis,” whose amoral tactics and myopic worldview I as a dissident feminist had to battle for decades. As a student of radio and a longtime listener of Rush’s show, I have gotten a wealth of pleasure and insight from him over the years. To attack Rush Limbaugh is to attack his audience — and to intensify the loyalty of his fan base.

http://www.salon.com/opinion/paglia/2009/03/11/mercury/

Dr Evil on March 11, 2009 at 9:49 AM

Why isn’t Reagan on our money?

OmahaConservative on March 11, 2009 at 9:50 AM

And what does Fineman write about? What a judicious guy Obama is, and that that’s the problem.

It is apparently very hard for some people to get off their knees.

The media went in 100% activists mode for Obama.
They are going to have to be dragged kicking and screaming back to reality.

Baxter Greene on March 11, 2009 at 9:51 AM

seven on March 11, 2009 at 9:47 AM

Not sure if he would like that. An expression from when I was much younger was “as queer as a $3 bill”

txaggie on March 11, 2009 at 9:52 AM

I find Fineman’s analysis incoherent. I do believe Obama is out of his depth. It’s remarkable to me Obama finds the current financial crisis a distraction from his leftist vision of remaking the country. He reminds me of the Custer character in the movie “Little Big Man” when his troops are being slaughtered and he’s still barking orders. Or maybe I should talk about rearranging deck chairs on the Titanic? He finds it annoying he must now create a new set of glib, vague, meaningless rhetoric to talk about the financial crisis. Because when has he ever demonstrated the ability to DO anything? Or to lead.

Paul-Cincy on March 11, 2009 at 9:54 AM

…and I thought that community organizer made the messiah more than qualified to be chief executive. I must withhold most of that I want to say or risk being called unhinged, however, after watching this #@$%$le screw up anything he touches, well let me just say, I can’t be disappointed as I knew this was going to be the case.

grumble, mumble ….

larvcom on March 11, 2009 at 9:55 AM

I said it before and Ill say it a again Obama is a n00b.

His election as President was like picking a five year old to drive a Mack truck down the interstate (even though he doesnt know how to drive and cant even see over the top of the steering wheel) because he seemed cool and promised to act in a responsible and mature fashion.

Dreadnought223 on March 11, 2009 at 9:56 AM

I went looking for the SNL 3am phone call skit because it seems to have hit the mark pretty well. Unfortunately it’s been pulled. You can still catch it within a MSNBC clip. Unfortunately you have to get past Oberman’s intro.

I expect it will be pulled too once they realize what’s on it so catch it while you can… http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OASouvpoS9U

Here is a version WITHOUT Olby

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kvH4rkkbs7M

izoneguy on March 11, 2009 at 10:00 AM

Doughboy on March 11, 2009 at 9:34 AM

More importantly than the format, is the fact that: a) a box of DVD’s is entirely unfitting as a gift to the head of state of our closest ally, who, to top off the insult b) just happens to be going blind.

Fallen Sparrow on March 11, 2009 at 10:00 AM

The guy really is the Midas of Manure. Every thing he touches turns to turds.

Patrick S on March 11, 2009 at 10:00 AM

The $787 billion stimulus, gargantuan as it was, was in fact too small and not aimed clearly enough at only immediate job-creation.

I wonder if Mr. Fineman can point us to that money tree the govt has been hiding and no I don’t mean a printing press either. The inflation that WILL be caused by all of this is bad enough. Consuming, borrowing and spending got us into this mess and for those who insist that more of the same on a much bigger scale is going to get us out of the hole and not in fact dig us deeper then they are simply defying the laws of economics, mathematics and common sense. We need to produce more, save more and consume less but don’t tell our betters in Washington that because it makes you an uncaring bastard who wants America to fail or even a racist.

Yakko77 on March 11, 2009 at 10:02 AM

Generational Theft on a scale never before seen…

And Porkulous II is headed at taxpayers later this month!

When are we going to actualy revolt?

Will we wait till ALL has been taken at the point of a gun by the tax man?

Our children and their childern can NOT pay this bedt off!

Mark Garnett on March 11, 2009 at 10:05 AM

Agrees with Rush about Feminazis and so do I.

Dr Evil on March 11, 2009 at 9:45 AM

ME TOO! That was a good article.

scalleywag on March 11, 2009 at 10:05 AM

This is all irrelevant. After all, it’s a

Bush depression

Bush depression

Bush depression

getalife

Del Dolemonte on March 11, 2009 at 10:09 AM

Do not think that Feinman or any of the other now-worried Democrats who backed Obama like a bunch of teen-age girls watching the Beatles debut on the Ed Sullivan Show are now going to admit they were completely wrong about the 2008 election.

The spin will be that Obama may not be up to the job, but no candidate could have solved the disaster caused by the Bush Administration, and we’re better off letting Barack learn in the White House for the next 3 1/2 years with a supportive Congress than to do anything crazy, like change the House and Senate 2010 and the presidency two years later. (Which of course, by late 2011, they will be saying he’s certainly gained enough gravitas now to earn another four-year term). You can also throw in a gratuitous “Sarah Palin is a fundamentalist idiot/Rush Limbaugh is an evil racist” line or two in there, which would then make the spin palatable to the Frum wing of the Republican Party.

jon1979 on March 11, 2009 at 10:11 AM

Journalism need not be conservative to be good.

ernesto on March 11, 2009 at 9:13 AM

Sorry for the confusion. I see conservatism as the height of the human condition and thus the best possible ideology to disseminate information fairly.

Liberalism is based on lies of the heart. It disguises the lust for power and control over mankind behind the premise that they truly “care” for their fellow man and are the only ones who can fix the worlds ills. It’s evil incarnated in our elected officials.

csdeven on March 11, 2009 at 10:14 AM

Of course, he will lose the support of the gop villagers but he has the American people.

That is all he needs for a second term.

getalife on March 11, 2009 at 10:15 AM

What The One has going for him now (which is showing up as the main reason he is not a leader) is that he has the majority of Democrats in the House and Senate. They are pampering him and pushing through whatever he thinks is good for America (which even the seasoned politicians on left side of the aisle know is not). What would have happened if either the House or Senate were Republican controlled?

Anyone can swim faster when with the tide. He has yet to try and swim against it. From the looks of it, he will be left high and dry just close to the left bank of this political river while still in the muddy waters; and then we all will be ruing election day 2008.

OneConservative on March 11, 2009 at 10:15 AM

That being said, the best journalism in the worlds coming out of the economist these days, and they’re conservative to be sure.

ernesto on March 11, 2009 at 9:13 AM

Hear hear. If you haven’t read it in a while you’ll be shocked to recall how much information they pack between those covers. I’m still reading the EU/Waste Management issue from a couple of weeks ago.

They did not like Obama’s tax plan, BTW!

DrSteve on March 11, 2009 at 10:16 AM

Del Dolemonte on March 11, 2009 at 10:09 AM

Dow up again.

Bush depression saved.

getalife on March 11, 2009 at 10:16 AM

seven on March 11, 2009 at 9:47 AM

That would be the eight dollar bill.

http://www.amazon.com/Barack-Obama-Eight-Dollar-Bill/dp/B001MX6CII/ref=pd_bxgy_misc_text_c?ie=UTF8&qid=1236303512&sr=1-15

Laura in Maryland on March 11, 2009 at 10:19 AM

“as queer as a $3 bill”

txaggie on March 11, 2009 at 9:52 AM

Oslime-a is “strange” and “odd”. Oslime-a may not, but perhaps the next president will make sure Oslime-a is “honored” on a $3 bill?

csdeven on March 11, 2009 at 10:20 AM

Yes – he is “Baracking the Economy”

izoneguy on March 11, 2009 at 9:35 AM

On analogy to “Don’t Tase Me, Bro,” here’s a message to Obama regarding the economy: “Don’t Barack Me, Bro.”

BuckeyeSam on March 11, 2009 at 10:23 AM

Why do we care about Washington insider observations? Our own senses are certainly adequate to the task.

I think he’s having no trouble steering — he’s just having trouble keeping the boat off the rocks since he insists on sailing close to shore.

Well, maybe a little trouble — when the HMS Downing Street pulled alongside and hailed him, he and his crew were asleep on deck.

The recent rise in the Dow shows that when Obama sleeps, and good news from another source is announced, the economy responds positively. The true test will come when Obama again awakes and takes the rudder.

unclesmrgol on March 11, 2009 at 10:23 AM

getalife on March 11, 2009 at 10:16 AM

You’re not even trying any more are you?

Ampersand on March 11, 2009 at 10:23 AM

Del Dolemonte on March 11, 2009 at 10:09 AM

A group of us agreed to a “ban” on getalife yesterday. We’re hoping the movement grows so that this coward doesn’t continue to hijack thread after thread…

Keemo on March 11, 2009 at 10:24 AM

I thought all he had to do was open his mouth, fart some rainbows, and everything would be marvelous. I guess stepping down from being the messiah into the actual job of the presidency is not as easy as we thought.

neuquenguy on March 11, 2009 at 10:26 AM

Bush depression

Bush depression

Bush depression

getalife

Del Dolemonte on March 11, 2009 at 10:09 AM

And on cue, just like in the movie Beetlejuice it shows it’s hidious little self. ( D/D, did you type that real fast?)

thomasaur on March 11, 2009 at 10:27 AM

getalife on March 11, 2009 at 10:16 AM

You’re not even trying any more are you?

Ampersand on March 11, 2009 at 10:23 AM

getalife reminds me of that old computer program “elisa” that tried to resemble conversation with a human. getalife seems to have more limited programming though.

neuquenguy on March 11, 2009 at 10:29 AM

The spin will be that Obama may not be up to the job, but no candidate could have solved the disaster caused by the Bush Administration, and we’re better off letting Barack learn in the White House for the next 3 1/2 years with a supportive Congress than to do anything crazy, like change the House and Senate 2010 and the presidency two years later.

Yep. That’s exactly what I am hearing.

It was too predicitable, wasn’t it?

Bob's Kid on March 11, 2009 at 10:30 AM

Obama swims in the middle about as much as Tony Soprano prefers to socialize with the PTA.

notagool on March 11, 2009 at 10:30 AM

A group of us agreed to a “ban” on getalife yesterday. We’re hoping the movement grows so that this coward doesn’t continue to hijack thread after thread…

We need an “ignore” button.

Bob's Kid on March 11, 2009 at 10:31 AM

Two weeks ago Howard Fineman was giving a speech and said that Keith Olbermann wasn’t a liberal.

Thus, any words Howard Fineman says should be reduced to ridicule, whether or not they appeal to our sensibilities. If that Olbermann statement can’t disqualify him as being a credible person, then the act itself is impossible to accomplish.

rjwest21 on March 11, 2009 at 10:32 AM

Laura in Maryland, that eight dollar bill is borderline illegal. There are places in deep inside Chicago and other large cities where that bill will be accepted without too much persuasion. I guarantee it. I think you know who lives in those “places.”

Pelayo on March 11, 2009 at 10:33 AM

Question:

Does anyone happen to know if the DVD’s the President gifted to the PM of the UK were the correct format for the UK? My understanding is that Europe DVD’s won’t play in North American players and vice versa.

Browncoatone on March 11, 2009 at 9:06 AM

So I guess this settles it.

Browncoatone on March 11, 2009 at 10:33 AM

I think you mean the three thousand dollar bill, not the quarter. LOL.

Jarhead68 on March 11, 2009 at 9:43 AM

There, fixed it for you. The value of the dollar in the post-Obama world being what it will…

Geministorm on March 11, 2009 at 10:36 AM

The Corner mentions more pointed criticism:

Democratic Business Sages Against Obama [Ed Whelan]

In an op-ed in today’s Washington Post“Mr. President, Time to Rein in the Chaos”— former Intel guru (and Obama supporter) Andrew S. Grove finds himself “wringing my hands, not over the goals President Obama has set [to deal with the ‘economic meltdown’] but over the ineffectual ways the administration has pursued them”:

He also mentions Warren Buffet’s criticism and concludes:

If this is what leading Democratic business sages are now saying publicly, imagine what they and others are saying privately. Will President Obama pay attention and dramatically revise his course (rather than just pay lip service to the criticisms)? Not if he’s the hard-core leftist ideologue that many of us have long perceived through the fog of his sweet-sounding rhetoric.

INC on March 11, 2009 at 10:41 AM

I think you mean the three dollar bill, not the quarter. LOL.

Jarhead68 on March 11, 2009 at 9:43 AM

Soon it will take 3 dollars to purchase what a quarter does at the moment… so the BHO $3 bill will be quite appropriate… I believe we need a government subsidy so we can all purchase wheelbarrows to replace our wallets.

Today’s Special: Coffee and a Donut only $4,725!

mankai on March 11, 2009 at 10:42 AM

More on Buffet:

Ignoring Warren Buffett [Mark Hemingway]

I’d read various insubstantive reports of Warren Buffet criticizing Obama — Mickey Kaus wonders if this is the first time the media has ignored Warren Buffet. He’s got a point here. In all of the media coverage, I had no idea how critical Buffett had been until I read the transcript Kaus provided:

If you’re in a war, and we really are on an economic war, there’s a obligation to the majority to behave in ways that don’t go around inflaming the minority. If on December 8th when—maybe it’s December 7th, when Roosevelt convened Congress to have a vote on the war, he didn’t say, `I’m throwing in about 10 of my pet projects…

Oof. There’s a lot more in the transcript, too.

INC on March 11, 2009 at 10:45 AM

I honestly don’t think Obama cares about being competent (or perceived as competent) on the economy, or most other issues. What really matters to him and his ‘advisors’ is getting massive funding handed out to the leftist voter fraud machine – ACORN, SEIU, and various open borders groups. This will guarantee democrat victories in elections from here to doomsday. In that, he has been overwhelmingly competent.

Mr. Pickles on March 11, 2009 at 10:46 AM

Today’s Special: Coffee and a Donut only $4,725!

mankai on March 11, 2009 at 10:42 AM

What will replace the dollar sign in the new Obama currency?
O

neuquenguy on March 11, 2009 at 10:46 AM

Not to mention that Barry would make a terrible judge, as he’s said on more than one occasion that he’s more interested in fairness than Constitutionality and the rule of law.

Too bad we don’t have do-overs; maybe some of the 53% who blindly voted for this fraud would reconsider their poor judgement.

redfoxbluestate on March 11, 2009 at 10:47 AM

He also mentions Warren Buffet’s criticism and concludes:

If this is what leading Democratic business sages are now saying publicly, imagine what they and others are saying privately. Will President Obama pay attention and dramatically revise his course (rather than just pay lip service to the criticisms)? Not if he’s the hard-core leftist ideologue that many of us have long perceived through the fog of his sweet-sounding rhetoric

.

INC on March 11, 2009 at 10:41 AM

It’s not simply that he’s a hard-core Lefty (we know that)… he’s simply incompetent. Have you ever worked with academics who have never run anything? They have a skewed view of how things work.

BHO actually believes that if we increase funding for the National Endowment for the Arts and use taxpayer dollars for embryonic stem cell research (etc.) utopia will ensue.

He has absolutely no idea what he’s doing. He looks at a failed program chock full of “good intentions” and concludes that if we just print money and increase funding it will somehow work. He doesn’t understand that all that garbage is horribly flawed as is the thinking behind it as are the people who concocted them.

Note that no one has tried to make the argument that government spending is a sensible and economically sound way to create wealth… they just do it because if we hand out more condoms and get more people on WIC the Kingdom will come.

mankai on March 11, 2009 at 10:49 AM

Why isn’t Reagan on our money?

OmahaConservative on March 11, 2009 at 9:50 AM

There has been and will continue to be a push to get Ronaldus Maximus on some currency. The last effort was to replace Alexander Hamilton on the $10 bill, which I find disturbing being a Hamilton guy. I think Ron would look great on the $20 bill and remove that arsehole Jackson from it, IMO.

cyclown on March 11, 2009 at 10:51 AM

He’d have made a fine judge.

If you believe that the purpose of the Constitution (which is subordinate to international law) is to redistribute wealth.

But we don’t need a judge. We need a blunt-spoken coach.

Oh, you mean an exucutive? Is this maybe why it’s a bad idea to elect a man who has less executive experience than your average Lieutenant with a year of platoon leadership/command under his belt?

OscarSchneegans on March 11, 2009 at 10:51 AM

I have searched for a list of the 25, but have not been successful. Someone posted on another thread that one of the movies was “Zulu Dawn.” Not only a movie about the worst defeat ever suffered by a colonial army at the hands of natives, but it is not even an American production (UK).

If this is true, it is not Obama’s ineptitude; it shows deep contempt for my British cousins.

Pelayo on March 11, 2009 at 10:53 AM

Have you ever worked with academics who have never run anything? They have a skewed view of how things work.

mankai on March 11, 2009 at 10:49 AM

No, but I’ve known enough to agree.

INC on March 11, 2009 at 10:56 AM

He’d have made a fine judge.

What is this based on? The One’s extensive trail of publications? Or is absolutely fantastic record of making decisions and not voting “present”? He could have followed the lead of the great legal scholar Justice Ginsberg.

The Obama administration is running water in a sinking boat.

cyclown on March 11, 2009 at 10:56 AM

Yakko77 on March 11, 2009 at 10:02 AM

I agree somewhat. really all we need is to produce more. however if we save and consume less at teh same time it will hasten the proccess.

The gov is banking on us growing our way out of the problem. Yet the fundemental difference in today’s economy has compared to reagan’s or FDR or JFK’s recessions is that we have to borrow the money in very larg sums. And pay interest on that money. Since the interest is around 4% that means that unless you know for a fact that the money borrowoed is going to produce growth in excess of that 4% or whatever it is then you will lose money on the process. and it will not work in the long term.

Even with a inflation rate of 10% without the underlying growth there is no way you can grow your way out of the problem since interest will simply increase to match inflation.

that is why people say that the stimulus bill was not big enough. It is not enough to produce growth in excess of the interest rate that is being charged on it.

If the growth rate is not big enough we have effectly made things worse since we are now paying more money then if we just would have done nothing. which is where I agree with you.

what the gov should have done is made a decsion early on wether any stimulus could produce GDP growth in excess of growth if not then they should either refi the debt they have and start paying off that debt or give tax cuts.

It is the same principle as credit cards. If you have an 18% interest payment on your credit card why would you invest in a CD paying 5% you are losing 13% on your investment. You would be better off to take the investment and pay off the debt first. you will get an 18% return on your money

unseen on March 11, 2009 at 10:56 AM

I think Ron would look great on the $20 bill and remove that arsehole Jackson from it, IMO.

cyclown on March 11, 2009 at 10:51 AM

Hear hear!

I have long been confused by historians fascination with Jackson. The man was a disaster. (Actually, I’m not that confused… noting the other “great Presidents” admired by said historians).

mankai on March 11, 2009 at 10:56 AM

Newspeak, er Newsweek has to support their man. It doesn’t have to make sense….to anyone but them.

GarandFan on March 11, 2009 at 10:58 AM

Have you ever worked with academics who have never run anything? They have a skewed view of how things work.

mankai on March 11, 2009 at 10:49 AM

No, but I’ve known enough to agree.

INC on March 11, 2009 at 10:56 AM

Perhaps Fineman doesn’t get it (although I find that hard to imagine). He should hire a group of college professors to run Newsweek for a year and get a taste of what Obama is doing to the country.

mankai on March 11, 2009 at 10:59 AM

I find Fineman’s analysis incoherent. I do believe Obama is out of his depth. It’s remarkable to me Obama finds the current financial crisis a distraction from his leftist vision of remaking the country. He reminds me of the Custer character in the movie “Little Big Man” when his troops are being slaughtered and he’s still barking orders. Or maybe I should talk about rearranging deck chairs on the Titanic? He finds it annoying he must now create a new set of glib, vague, meaningless rhetoric to talk about the financial crisis. Because when has he ever demonstrated the ability to DO anything? Or to lead.

Paul-Cincy on March 11, 2009 at 9:54 AM

Presidenting is hard!

rockmom on March 11, 2009 at 10:59 AM

Perhaps Fineman doesn’t get it (although I find that hard to imagine). He should hire a group of college professors to run Newsweek for a year and get a taste of what Obama is doing to the country.

mankai on March 11, 2009 at 10:59 AM

LOL. Better yet, let them hire Rahm Emanuel and Paul Bagala. They would use half the magazine to attack National Review while their circulation plummets.

rockmom on March 11, 2009 at 11:01 AM

Sorry for the confusion. I see conservatism as the height of the human condition and thus the best possible ideology to disseminate information fairly.

Liberalism is based on lies of the heart. It disguises the lust for power and control over mankind behind the premise that they truly “care” for their fellow man and are the only ones who can fix the worlds ills. It’s evil incarnated in our elected officials.

csdeven on March 11, 2009 at 10:14 AM

Conservative thinking is based on logic and reason. Conversely Liberal thinking is based on emotion, irrational idealism and self loathing.

Dreadnought223 on March 11, 2009 at 11:03 AM

rockmom on March 11, 2009 at 11:01 AM

Their first instinct would be to change over a few of the presses to start printing currency.

mankai on March 11, 2009 at 11:04 AM

getalife reminds me of that old computer program “elisa” that tried to resemble conversation with a human. getalife seems to have more limited programming though.

neuquenguy on March 11, 2009 at 10:29 AM

A wrote a version on a Commodore 64 decades ago. Its output was much more interesting, seemingly intelligent and somewhat original. Maybe I’ll right a new version to simulate a libtard sockpuppet in anticipation the next open registration.

DarkCurrent on March 11, 2009 at 11:07 AM

We’re just blessed and lucky that nothing out of the ordinary is going on these days, otherwise we really couldn’t afford on-the-job training.

We’ve elected the right man for these easy going times.

Dorvillian on March 11, 2009 at 11:09 AM

I trace them to a central trait of the president’s character: he’s not really an in-your-face guy.

Did this author miss Barry calling out Rush? The “President” calling out a private citizen?

Did this guy miss him calling out the Freshman Republican House congressman in FRONT of his own constituents?

Romeo13 on March 11, 2009 at 11:09 AM

Camille Paglia, Heads Should Roll, Agrees with Rush about Feminazis and so do I.

Dr Evil on March 11, 2009 at 9:45 AM

If you have not read Paglia’s article, linked above, I strongly recommend it. She is one of the saner, more contemplative voices of feminism, and her intellect far outweighs her blind loyalty to the Liberal cause. However, after reading this article, I couldn’t help but wonder why she would support Obama, other than reflexively, because that’s what good Liberals do. She totally impugns his staff as a bunch of “drunken frat boys” wreaking havoc on an already tenuous Precendency. She admits that this administration is indeed “in over its head” and the children’s hour is at hand. So, if Obama is injudicious enough to surround himself with these wannabes and hangers on, why would she support him? It would seem that when someone exhibits such horrific judgment over and over and over again, it’s time to admit that the rats need to go down with the ship.

I did enjoy her obviously heartfelt support for Rush and his right to free speech as well as his hard earned wealth and status. And I can agree with her that Rush being elevated to his current status demonstrates a vacuum in the Republican leadership. If we had some truly principled conservatives out there, Rush would not have to assume that mantle, nor be saddled with it de facto.

Kudos to Camille Paglia for daring to speak the truth, and at Salon, no less. How long before the wheels of the bus go round and round, and she gets thrown under them? Can you say “enemies list…?”

College Prof on March 11, 2009 at 11:10 AM

Flounder-In-Chief.

Not waving, but drowning” as the poet put it.

profitsbeard on March 11, 2009 at 11:11 AM

cyclown on March 11, 2009 at 10:51 AM

Agreed. The effort to remove Hamilton from the $10 bill particularly annoyed me: his influence on the founding of our nation is too vast for him to be removed, in my opinion. Journalist, lawyer, soldier, banker, treasury secretary and political philosopher; like him or not, he casts a long shadow across our nation, like his main rival, Jefferson.

Fallen Sparrow on March 11, 2009 at 11:16 AM

We should all be quiet and let President Obama eat his waffle.

gridlock2 on March 11, 2009 at 11:19 AM

Dr Evil

I don’t think Rush racialized the McNabb issue. The fawning sports media did that. Rush just hammered the hypocrisy that runs rampant through their scurrilous screeds. (Poetic, eh?)

SKYFOX on March 11, 2009 at 11:21 AM

This is all irrelevant. After all, it’s a

Bush depression

Bush depression

Bush depression

That’s right…please focus people! This is all Bush’s fault…that and those evil Jooooooooos.

Wyznowski on March 11, 2009 at 11:25 AM

Barry Brah is over his head because he always “pearls.”

Christien on March 11, 2009 at 11:32 AM

As a “fine judge” Obama would have awarded O’s Man (William Ayres) a hundred million dollars as compensation for malicious prosecution.

burt on March 11, 2009 at 11:40 AM

Perhaps Fineman doesn’t get it (although I find that hard to imagine). He should hire a group of college professors to run Newsweek for a year and get a taste of what Obama is doing to the country.

mankai on March 11, 2009 at 10:59 AM

LOL. Better yet, let them hire Rahm Emanuel and Paul Bagala. They would use half the magazine to attack National Review while their circulation plummets.

rockmom on March 11, 2009 at 11:01 AM

:-)

INC on March 11, 2009 at 11:48 AM

getalife on March 11, 2009 at 10:16 AM

You’re not even trying any more are you?

Ampersand on March 11, 2009 at 10:23 AM

Soros cut his pay in anticipation of higher taxes next year.

jjshaka on March 11, 2009 at 11:54 AM

When do we get to say, “I told you so” to our liberal friends? Too soon?

Mallard T. Drake on March 11, 2009 at 11:56 AM

That’s right…please focus people! This is all Bush’s fault…that and those evil Jooooooooos.

Wyznowski on March 11, 2009 at 11:25 AM

bush abandonment of conservatism and free market principles got us into this mess. Obama is digging the hole deeper and wider. Clinton and bush 1 started the added their share to the hole. Regan tried to fill in the hole that FDR and LBJ started.

thing of it as the BIG DIG by gov for the last 200 odd years. Since the founding the gov has been trying to break the bonds we placed on it. The bonds broke with Bush now Obama has free reign to remake the country. Bush was an idiot internationalist who believes in the same things Obama does except he thinks he can do it better.

Look at the reactions of the politicians when you bring up the word socialism. They laugh like its a joke because if people understood what socialism really is than our governemnt has been full on socialist for the last 20 years and quasi socialist for the last 70.

unseen on March 11, 2009 at 11:58 AM

Wow. It’s almost like Obama has no real administrative leadership whatsoever.

Why didn’t someone tell us that during the campaign?

29Victor on March 11, 2009 at 12:06 PM

I was wondering how long it would take for the DC elites to see the Messiah as The Incompetent-in-Chief. This guy has nothing to offer other than he reads what’s put in front of him very, very well. The lack of leadership will only get worse.
By the way, anyone see what the Australians have to say about Geithner?

n0doz on March 11, 2009 at 12:08 PM

Wow. It’s almost like Obama has no real administrative leadership whatsoever.

29Victor on March 11, 2009 at 12:06 PM

Yes, the Seinfeld episode when Kramer is reviewed by his incredulous boss, who says, it’s as if you have no business training whatsoever, and that the reports Kramer produced are “gibberish”. I can’t find the verbatim transcript, but it is hilarious. That’s Obama all right. Zero experience.

Paul-Cincy on March 11, 2009 at 12:17 PM

Obama is worse than I thought he would be, I thought he would atleast try to act moderate for political reasons but no he is a liberal socialist nightmare. He believes its about him and his ego is bigger than any politician i’ve ever seen, now that includes Bubba. The only decent thing is that his foreign policy isn’t as bad as Carter, he hasn’t surrendered yet to the Towel Heads.

lavell12 on March 11, 2009 at 12:19 PM

Bush Obama, Waters, Franks depression saved.

getalife on March 11, 2009 at 10:16 AM

But only because Obama has kept his lip zipped for the past couple of days.

unclesmrgol on March 11, 2009 at 12:20 PM

And from Rasmussen today:

Thirty-one percent (31%) now Strongly Disapprove giving Obama a Presidential Approval Index rating of +6, his lowest rating to date

The sinking ship SS Obama is sinking further every day…

Norwegian on March 11, 2009 at 12:33 PM

Obama is not only in over his head he is about to go down for the third time. The sad thing is that his total lack of experience and radical views were totally obvious to anyone who paid the slightest attention in the run up to his election. Buyers remorse doesn’t solve the problem.

duff65 on March 11, 2009 at 12:35 PM

The only decent thing is that his foreign policy isn’t as bad as Carter, he hasn’t surrendered yet to the Towel Heads esteemed Muslims who worship the one, true God.

lavell12 on March 11, 2009 at 12:19 PM

He hasn’t had a chance to surrender yet… but it will come.

mankai on March 11, 2009 at 12:45 PM

The Obama 3 dollar bill.

http://www.slick.com/obama/

milwife88 on March 11, 2009 at 12:47 PM

The greatest wealth destruction of our lifetime… compliments of The Obamanator.

petefrt on March 11, 2009 at 9:45 AM

The easiest way to make everyone equal, is to make them equally poor.

Of course, Obama does still seem to be feasting on those Waygu steaks…

18-1 on March 11, 2009 at 12:50 PM

There has been and will continue to be a push to get Ronaldus Maximus on some currency. The last effort was to replace Alexander Hamilton on the $10 bill, which I find disturbing being a Hamilton guy. I think Ron would look great on the $20 bill and remove that arsehole Jackson from it, IMO.

cyclown on March 11, 2009 at 10:51 AM

Do you know how much fighting goes on between the Republicans and Democrats each time a memorial or monument to a President is built?

unclesmrgol on March 11, 2009 at 12:53 PM

And yet he is by temperament judicious (Me: Didn’t Rich Lowry satirically describe him yesterday as “calm”?), even judicial. He’d have made a fine judge.

Fineman is wrong that Pres. Obama would be a fine judge. Obama has made it clear that he feels judges should feel free to impose their personal views when they come in conflict with black letter law passed by elected representatives.

Even though Pres. Obama shows signs of being a disaster as President, I submit that it is far better that he be President than judge…at least as President he is elected by someone, and accountable.

Blaise on March 11, 2009 at 12:55 PM

Fineman is such a sycophant.

I have worked for a guy very similar to Obama in so many ways, it´s eerie. Based on that experience, let me guess what the Obama management style is:

He doesn´t lead from the front and tries to avoid making decisions and taking responsibility – unless he figures the risk is very small (which is why he prefers to focus on unimportant, superficial and symbolic stuff). He uses other people and whatever goes wrong will not be his fault. He will tell you what he thinks you need to be told in order to function, true or not. And when you tell him about longterm problems, he will politely ignore you. You will not get clear instructions (in our case, at one point 70 % of all projects had the highest priority) so departments spent a lot of time guessing what he wants and going down blind alleys.

Needless to say, this style doesn´t produce good results. It didn´t produce good results in our company, that´s for sure.

el gordo on March 11, 2009 at 12:56 PM

Just heard Limbaugh relate something by Washington Times guy Bill Sammon, who said that the Louisiana Reptile, James Carville, once told a group of reporters that he hoped that Bush failed.

He said this to them on the morning of September 11, 2001. When they started to hear about the attacks, James shouted out to the reporters that “he didn’t mean it” or some such nonsense.

Del Dolemonte on March 11, 2009 at 1:04 PM

Flashback-Carville said before 9/11 attacks he wanted Bush to fail.

http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2009/03/11/carville-wanted-bush-fail/

Del Dolemonte on March 11, 2009 at 1:08 PM

But Del, we’ve always been at war with EastAsia dissent has always been unpatriotic!

das411 on March 11, 2009 at 1:57 PM

Obama in over his head? I don’t believe it. (insert smiley face here)

- The Cat

MirCat on March 11, 2009 at 2:21 PM

By the by, has anyone heard from Rick Santelli, he seems to have dropped off the radar.

clinker46 on March 11, 2009 at 9:36 AM
Pray to God he’s interviewing with Fox Business. I feared he would reap some harm.

JiangxiDad on March 11, 2009 at 9:40 AM

After his last rant (last week where I caught it in the middle (he was teasing about the “JOBS, JOBS, JOBS” mantra and cut somebody’s credit card that that person did not want anymore.

He saluted and said that he was gonna be off all this week. That’s all I know.

ProudPalinFan on March 11, 2009 at 2:28 PM

Comment pages: 1 2 3