Breaking: Chas Freeman out at NIC; Update: Hoekstra statement
posted at 5:10 pm on March 10, 2009 by Ed Morrissey
Share on Facebook | printer-friendly
Another ill-considered appointment in the Barack Obama administration has come to an abrupt halt. Dennis Blair has reconsidered his choice of Chas Freeman as chair of the National Intelligence Council:
Director of National Intelligence Dennis C. Blair announced today that Ambassador Charles W. Freeman Jr. has requested that his selection to be Chairman of the National Intelligence Council not proceed. Director Blair accepted Ambassador Freeman’s decision with regret.
The more people found out about Freeman, the worse he got — and not just among conservative critics. His ties to CNOOC, his remarks about the Tiananmen Square protesters, and his support of a national ID after 9/11 painted a strange picture of the man who would run the process of evaulating our intelligence. That, plus the fact that Freeman had no intelligence experience — when the CIA also has a no-experience political fixer running it — doomed Freeman’s appointment.
Apparently, the Obama administration got the message from the Hill today. Dianne Feinstein requested that Freeman make himself available to the Senate Select Committee on Intelligence, signaling that she was not pleased with Blair’s choice. The White House had let Blair twist in the wind when Freeman started taking flack, first among Israel’s allies in DC and later as more critics began to speak out. They pointed out that the White House had no input on the choice and no opportunity to vet Freeman before Blair announced his pick.
What’s interesting is that Freeman crashed on Capitol Hill even without needing Senate confirmation. That shows how weird this selection was in the first place, and continues the feckless performance of the Obama administration on staffing the senior positions in the new administration.
Update: Pete Hoekstra started off the scrutiny of this pick, at least on Capitol Hill, and now the ranking member on the House Intelligence Commitee just released a response:
“The Director of National Intelligence has informed the committee that Charles Freeman has decided to withdraw his name from further consideration as chairman of the National Intelligence Council. The by Mr. Freeman to withdraw his name is the right decision under the circumstances. decision
“Mr. Freeman’s selection as chairman of the council was a poor choice from the beginning. Given his financial dealings with a Chinese state-run oil company and the backing of his think tank by the government of Saudi Arabia, it raises serious questions about the vetting that was done by the administration. Mr. Freeman’s extensive record of questionable public statements, including those that seemed to defend the Tiananmen Square massacre and raise questions about the American character following the 9/11 attacks, should have been more than enough to give the administration pause.
“This is yet another breakdown in the Obama administration vetting process—one more in a long series of missteps. More fundamentally, on an intelligence matter, it calls into question the essential judgments being made. As with Guantanamo Bay and interrogation, the administration seemingly reached a decision before thinking through all the issues. I hope the administration will show greater consideration in the future.”
Or maybe even some evidence of consideration at all.
Previous posts on Freeman:
- Chas Freeman: 9/11 our fault, and the Israelis’
- Obama loses two more nominees
- Obama national-security choice has foreign conflicts of interest
You must be logged in to post a comment.

















Blowback
Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.
Trackbacks/Pings
Trackback URL
Comments
Comment pages: « Previous 1 2
No he didn’t appoint them he pardoned them.
Dire Straits on March 10, 2009 at 7:52 PM
An improvement.
.
To paraphrase what i have said before, “If Obama nominates me for a cabinet position, I’m suing him for defamation of character.
darktood on March 10, 2009 at 8:11 PM
Chas Freeman’s response, as quoted in the economist:
Some of the text, from Laura Rozen:
The libels on me and their easily traceable email trails show conclusively that there is a powerful lobby determined to prevent any view other than its own from being aired, still less to factor in American understanding of trends and events in the Middle East. The tactics of the Israel Lobby plumb the depths of dishonor and indecency and include character assassination, selective misquotation, the willful distortion of the record, the fabrication of falsehoods, and an utter disregard for the truth. The aim of this Lobby is control of the policy process through the exercise of a veto over the appointment of people who dispute the wisdom of its views, the substitution of political correctness for analysis, and the exclusion of any and all options for decision by Americans and our government other than those that it favors.
Not a lot of subtlety, there.
rob verdi on March 10, 2009 at 8:23 PM
Were this fat loser and Barney Frank separated at birth?
Or just after a few moments in a rest room stall?
NoDonkey on March 10, 2009 at 9:13 PM
Keystone cops.
Starts at the top.
Maybe Mr HopeyChangey should have tried working for a year or two before becoming President. He might have learned a thing or two about running operations.
notagool on March 10, 2009 at 9:16 PM
When Barry fails, the outlook for the country gets better…
phreshone on March 10, 2009 at 9:39 PM
I hear that Ray “Chocolate City” Nagin has a full fleet of slightly soggy buses to lend to Ackbar.
onlineanalyst on March 10, 2009 at 9:41 PM
Steve Z: This is all part of the Master Plan: Obama’s Great Leap Forward. (with a tip of the hat to Mao, his mentor)
Obama has a lot on his plate right now. He is scrutizing, line by line, all of Bush’s signing statements.
This man-child has skewed priorities and a lot of subversiveness to answer for.
onlineanalyst on March 10, 2009 at 9:55 PM
As our Rev once said : “Gotta watch out for the Joooos!”
Fuquay Steve on March 10, 2009 at 9:55 PM
Worst President EVAR!!!?
James on March 10, 2009 at 11:53 PM
People are leaving too. Our cybersecurity chief is stepping down.
http://archive.newsmax.com/archives/articles/2004/10/1/113414.shtml
journeyintothewhirlwind on March 11, 2009 at 12:50 AM
This might be the one I wanted…
http://www.newsmax.com/us/nsa_cybersecurity_/2009/03/09/189832.html
journeyintothewhirlwind on March 11, 2009 at 12:56 AM
How bad is it? he can’t even appoint the undead without a scandal. (:c)
petertheslow on March 11, 2009 at 2:42 AM
The theme song for the Obamanation Administration, Another One Bites the Dust.
eaglewingz08 on March 11, 2009 at 7:35 AM
I hear that the new first potential dog has asked to be taken off the list as well.
DanaSmiles on March 11, 2009 at 8:03 AM
The evil clownulus Obama is trying to lower expectations. Were he to make a modestly competent decision, the plebes will just go nuts over it.
trl on March 11, 2009 at 8:36 AM
Comment pages: « Previous 1 2