But what does Obama want?

posted at 8:57 am on March 9, 2009 by Ed Morrissey

My friend Kevin McCullough offers some red meat in his weekly syndicated column by reversing the Rush controversy.  Forget what a radio talk show host wants; does Barack Obama want America to fail?  Does the new President want to use a series of crises to fundamentally change the nature of America?  Kevin thinks so:

President Obama knows the history of recessions and how Americans get out of them. He knows, for example, that if he gave back to the American family in just pure cash handouts what he is instead planning on taxing them (with interest) in the days to come, that the number would loom between $25,000-$65,000 per family, for every family in America.

But pretending to be doing something about the problem is only half the strategy for Obama. He truly intends to see socialized health care, and European styled labor agreements become reality in America. He knows the consequences of doing such things, he’s seen all the projections and what the outcomes would be, but he’s doing it anyway.

But there is one tiny problem standing in his way to getting there–”We The People!”

He knows that in order to be forced down paths that we don’t wish to go, the only way he gets us to change our mind is to create abject suffering and misery.

Then in Venezuelan styled cries for help, he can promise to take America to a better place economically, a place of greater care, a place of true serenity. A place like Venezuela.

I’m not sure I’d say that Obama wants America to fail, as much as I’d credit this to a belief that America had already failed.  Obama is a typical liberal ideologue who thinks that America has failed in the sense of equality of result.  He sees inequities and thinks that government exists to eliminate all of them.  My guess is that he’s aiming much more for France than Venezuela, but neither are particularly palatable destinations for a national economy.  Obama seems to see our entire 230-year history as a long crisis that his statist policies will end.

What we’re seeing is the policy playbook of the Left.  We predicted this all along, while the media hailed Obama as some sort of centrist without a shred of evidence for that.  He has a long history, though, of alliances with the Left, and it comes as no shock that Obama has shown his true colors in the first days of his presidency.  Massive government spending, reductions in defense, and preparation for nationalization of health care, banks, and other private industries fit well as a pattern with those policy goals.

Eventually, this agenda will sour Americans on Obama, and according to Rasmussen, that process may have already started.  His approval ratings have begun to slide, now at 56% after spending most of the last few months in the high 60s or above.  The difference between those who strongly approve and strongly disapprove has dropped to 8 points.  Obama has scored as high as 30 points on that measure, and its quick drop has to have a few people at the White House wondering how much farther Obama can afford to go.  Bill Clinton lost Congress in his first mid-terms even while remaining personally popular, and the GOP will have a good shot of at least winning back the House.

Kevin and I will talk more about this on today’s Ed Morrissey Show at 3 pm ET.

Blowback

Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.

Trackbacks/Pings

Trackback URL

Comments

Comment pages: 1 2 3

The Organizer hates the United States of America with every fiber of his being, and is working fast so that whatever damage he does will be irreversible by 2010.

The head-up-their-ass American sheeple are much too far behind the curve to see what is really happening, and by the time enough do catch on to what Obama has done, it will be too late to reverse it.

-Dave

Dave R. on March 9, 2009 at 1:56 PM

I’m in software development (probably worked on your OS and browser). I can assure you old computers do NOT have minds of their own. It’s your fingers.

DarkCurrent on March 9, 2009 at 1:47 PM

Now, now, allow me to think I am perfect and it this machine screwing up:<)

Jvette on March 9, 2009 at 1:57 PM

But what if he were aiming for Canada?

ernesto on March 9, 2009 at 9:01 AM

Stephen Harper has already told Obama he will not enact carbon taxes, and the sand oil from Alberta is a take-it-or-leave-it deal. Unless, another agreement was worked out during the recent Canadian visit, but Harper is to the right of Obama and made of pretty stern stuff.

The Canadian immigration system is more orderly and efficient than ours. The penalties are harsh, if you break their laws. There are strictly enforced guest worker programs. The income taxes are double ours. All for a barely workable health care system. Canada is no utopia, but their bureaucracy functions more efficiently than ours does with a significantly smaller population and while the government is twice the size. If that sounds appealing to you, move there.

chunderroad on March 9, 2009 at 1:58 PM

Uh what country is it again?

DeathToMediaHacks on March 9, 2009 at 1:25 PM

China

DarkCurrent on March 9, 2009 at 2:02 PM

He wants to save the country from the bush depression.

Can you wait 100 days before blaming him for bush failures?

Geez.

getalife on March 9, 2009 at 2:06 PM

WE ARE THE PEOPLE WHO CAN MAKE A DIFFERENCE!!!

Please visit these websites:

http://taxdayteaparty.com/

http://shop.cafepress.com/anti-obama

WE HAVE TO MAKE OUR VOICES HEARD!

Ltlgeneral64 on March 9, 2009 at 2:07 PM

Either he’s the biggest moron to come down the pike or he is purposely trying to bankrupt America and turn it into a socialist state, that much is obvious. It could be a combination of both, but as a puppet for George Soros, I’m thinking it’s socialism that’s the main topic on the agenda.

flytier on March 9, 2009 at 2:08 PM

How anyone can think that such an ethos unAmerican doesn’t know this nation’s history. Here’s my question for the folks on this board. At what point did Americans need top stop criticizing the status quo and just accept things as they are… after Reagan got elected?

DeathToMediaHacks on March 9, 2009 at 9:15 AM

How about 1964? The first black Supreme Court justice was nominated in 1967, yet the left makes such a big deal about Obama (raised by whites and educated in private schools) becoming president of the Harvard Law Review. That was his best-selling book and chief qualification for POTUS.

Civil rights and equal opportunity are one thing. The Constitution was explicit in which rights are derived from our Creator — human rights — and which are derived from government. Therefore, government allowing for the social contract which would allow us to decide our own rights was fair for everyone concerned. Obama wants a new “Constitution” where the government decides your rights, “for a livable working wage, for healthcare, for education.” Then you are answerable to the government for how much you earn, how you think and whether you live or die even.

chunderroad on March 9, 2009 at 2:10 PM

Furthermore, I look back on the struggles America has endured, and I am proud of a nation that has grown together. I am not ashamed of a dark past. I love my country as it is, because it provides opportunity for everyone.

chunderroad on March 9, 2009 at 2:12 PM

Either he’s the biggest moron to come down the pike or he is purposely trying to bankrupt America and turn it into a socialist state

I disagree with the “or” here, I think he’s BOTH the bigggest moron to come down the pike AND he is purposely trying to bankrupt America.

Although you could make the argument that the Bed Crapper in Chief is the second biggest moron, as everyone who VOTED for him is tied for first.

NoDonkey on March 9, 2009 at 2:12 PM

But what does Obama want?

Your money.

Your obedience.

Montana on March 9, 2009 at 2:16 PM

More like a gradual move towards improvement that his policies will continue. When this country began only landed men could vote, women and black people were property, and only Anglo-Saxons were eligible for citizenship. And it took about two hundred years for most of those to get sorted out legally. Did the people who wanted universal male suffrage critique the history of only landed men having the right to vote? yes. Were women who wanted to vote critical of America’s history of male privelige? Of course. Were workers who organized the first unions critical of the legacy of an aristocratic planter/baron class? Yes. Indeed, America as a project IS a project of: 1. Criticism of history/status quo 2. Aggressive moves to correct those problems. Lest we forget the Revolutionary War.

How anyone can think that such an ethos unAmerican doesn’t know this nation’s history. Here’s my question for the folks on this board. At what point did Americans need top stop criticizing the status quo and just accept things as they are…after Reagan got elected?

DeathToMediaHacks on March 9, 2009 at 9:15 AM

You do not mention that women during the past were mostly unmotivated to procure ‘voting rights’.They were happy, along with Abby Adams herself, to share their ‘vote’ with their husbands.
Indentured servants were property too & lots of them were ‘Anglo-Saxon’ (which as a modern racial term really means nothing).
I’m not sure your claim of only ‘Anglo-Saxons’ were allowed to vote is necessarily true of early America. I’d have to check on that, but I am pretty sure there were a decent amount of exceptions to that rule.
When we criticize Obama were ARE questioning the status quo.
The problems we have now are a direct result of too much taxation without representation & the federal government supplanting states’ rights to govern themselves.
The federal govt should only exist at the pleasure of the states.

That it clearly not the case.
We are a Republic that has been restructured to resemble a Democracy & the ideology Obama has about achieving social justice is astonishingly corrupt & wrong & does NOT fit the model for a Republic.
I do agree that America is an experiment in govt-but if it goes wrong-it’s going to be bad.
And going ‘socialist’ is bad.

Badger40 on March 9, 2009 at 2:21 PM

Obama is a typical liberal ideologue who thinks that America has failed in the sense of equality of result. He sees inequities and thinks that government exists to eliminate all of them.

I think that is accurate

However, I would go further. His wife, and his church have exhibited visceral dislike for America as it stands, and I sense the dislike goes deeper than inequality.

I am trying to read Obama. The whoopie parties at the White House, and the blatant snubs appear to be simple acting out. Revenge, not reverence is the subliminal message being broadcast

He is controlled with his followers (the very white MSM) and he gets in trouble when he is not staged with teleprompter. The unstaged remarks with the British PM were revealing.

The insult of the gifts was deliberate

Obama’s crew is now taking the credit (i.e. trasferring the blame) by announcing all over the MSM it was their plan all along to target Limbaugh after the unchained Obama repeatedly told America not to listen to one man. At the least, Obama was using the power of his office to ruin the lawful livelihood of one man.

My teacher used to say, watch the quiet ones. Obama kept quiet a long time. He stayed low in the Senate. He has some big handlers but when Obama is unleashed it isn’t a pretty sight. I rate him childish, petty, and mean. Under the niceness

entagor on March 9, 2009 at 2:21 PM

Imagine, instead of tax cuts, we had used the Clinton surplus to shore up social security and medicaire? Sure, the Bush tax policies lead to economic growth and wealth creation, nearly all of which has now been wiped away and the problem of the uninsured has grown, not fallen.

DeathToMediaHacks on March 9, 2009 at 10:30 AM

The Clinton surplus was projected; it was never realized. Fact.

The Bush supply side economics led to 52 months of job growth. The housing bubble was artificially created by our government. Every attempt by the Bush administration to reform the GSEs was either blocked in committee by House Democrats or filibustered in the Senate. The problem was totally ignored when Democrats took Congress in 2006.

Insurance has nothing to do with the economy, and it does nothing about the rising unemployment that will continue to erode consumer confidence. It is a spending program that will delay economic recovery — if not tip the scales.

chunderroad on March 9, 2009 at 2:21 PM

Can you wait 100 days before blaming him for bush failures?

Geez.

getalife on March 9, 2009 at 2:06 PM

Is the deal that we can start blaming Obama for everything after 100 days and you’ll agree? I’ll take that. Bush failures will be long forgotten and insignificant before day 100 of Obama.

DarkCurrent on March 9, 2009 at 2:25 PM

Furthermore, I look back on the struggles America has endured, and I am proud of a nation that has grown together. I am not ashamed of a dark past. I love my country as it is, because it provides opportunity for everyone.

chunderroad on March 9, 2009 at 2:12 PM

+ 1 trillion

DarkCurrent on March 9, 2009 at 2:27 PM

Furthermore, I look back on the struggles America has endured, and I am proud of a nation that has grown together. I am not ashamed of a dark past. I love my country as it is, because it provides opportunity for everyone.

chunderroad on March 9, 2009 at 2:12 PM

Brilliantly said chunderroad! Liberals should be ashamed of enabling a dark future

jbtripp on March 9, 2009 at 2:32 PM

Furthermore, I look back on the struggles America has endured, and I am proud of a nation that has grown together. I am not ashamed of a dark past. I love my country as it is, because it provides opportunity for everyone.

chunderroad on March 9, 2009 at 2:12 PM

Here! Here!

Jvette on March 9, 2009 at 2:35 PM

 
Maybe he does want a total train wreck so he can win his spurs as total savior.
 
…and we get TOTAL government.
 

ElRonaldo on March 9, 2009 at 2:42 PM

Well, I have been here longer than I should. Have a great day all you great Americans.

Jvette on March 9, 2009 at 2:43 PM

But what does Obama want?

To exact REVENGE on whites, the rich, the smart, and Western civilization, in general. That is it. The idiot messiah cares about nothing else but making these groups pay, and pay dearly. And he won’t stop until he’s thrown out.

progressoverpeace on March 9, 2009 at 3:06 PM

Leftists believe that out of Chaos comes order. I guess Right wing extremists believe the same as well…but they have a snowball’s chance in hell for the foreseeable future.

The Communists believe that you have to tear it down in order to build it back up…in Karl Marx’s image of course.

Pol Pot was an extreme example of this mentality.

Dr. ZhivBlago on March 9, 2009 at 5:05 PM

punish the rich for working,shame on you rich people ,get in the wefare line like everybody else.maybe are grandchildren can grow in a country that acts like france they can burn cars at night to fight global cooling.

wade underhile on March 9, 2009 at 5:26 PM

I’m thinking this idiot has a global case of Munchausen’s Syndrome by Proxy:

MUNCHAUSEN BY PROXY (MBP) (also called Munchausen Syndrome by Proxy, Munchausen by Proxy Syndrome, and Factitious Disorder by Proxy) is a label for a pattern of behavior in which caretakers deliberately exaggerate and/or fabricate and/or induce physical and/or psychological-behavioral-mental health problems in others.

This pattern of behavior constitutes a separate kind of maltreatment (abuse/neglect) that manifests as physical abuse, sexual abuse, emotional abuse, neglect, or a combination. The primary purpose of this behavior is to gain some form of internal gratification, such as attention, for the perpetrator.

Fork up the economy, foreign policy, national security (yikes!), blame it on Bush, and then…..SWOOP in to save the day. Except – he’s not smart enough to save a ball of twine, let alone the economy.

uncivilized on March 9, 2009 at 5:42 PM

I don’t think Obama wants to destroy America..even if that is what he does..he wants to save us from ourselves. Typical liberal do gooderism. He will just love us to death by Golly.

gag me.

Terrye on March 9, 2009 at 6:22 PM

The Organizer hates the United States of America with every fiber of his being, and is working fast so that whatever damage he does will be irreversible by 2010.

The head-up-their-ass American sheeple are much too far behind the curve to see what is really happening, and by the time enough do catch on to what Obama has done, it will be too late to reverse it.

-Dave

Dave R. on March 9, 2009 at 1:56 PM

AHMEN BROTHER. Totally agree!

JeffVader on March 9, 2009 at 6:49 PM

I don’t think Obama wants to destroy America..even if that is what he does..he wants to save us from ourselves. Typical liberal do gooderism. He will just love us to death by Golly.

gag me.

Terrye on March 9, 2009 at 6:22 PM

Sorry, Terrye. It’s far more sinister than that. We are only lucky that they are such morons. otherwise this country wouldn’t even have a fighting chance.

progressoverpeace on March 9, 2009 at 7:31 PM

What does he-whose-middle-name-must-not-be-spoken want?

Socialism.

What better way than to create the biggest mob possible through an abject failure of leadership.

Chains we can believe in.

Mojave Mark on March 9, 2009 at 10:16 PM

The question isn’t ‘what he wants’…


The question we have to ask is: Are we going to let him do what he wants?

This is not a dictatorship. The president works for us. Congress works for us. I am sick and fed up with the leaders of our country ignoring the will of the PEOPLE! Leaders that cheat on taxes and expect me to pay extra.

This is MY country too! I refuse to stand idly by. I will fight. Whatever it takes. Tea Party, here I come!

TN Mom on March 9, 2009 at 11:52 PM

Obama never thought he had a chance to win the Presidency.

He was swept along on a tide of white guilt and BDS and race-baiting, and is now stranded like a turtle on a fence post wondering what the hell to do.

He got more than he bargained for or even wanted.

And we’re all going to have to live through his pathetic attempts at pretending he knows what he’s doing.

And that he really wanted the job this time.

He’s like a kid who learned one two-finger tune on the keyboards and who then jokingly put in an appplication for Concert Pianist at Carneie Hall …and, though a colossal technical fluke, actually got the position.

Get ready for four frikkin’years of “Chopsticks”.

profitsbeard on March 10, 2009 at 1:16 AM

profitsbeard on March 10, 2009 at 1:16 AM

Very well put, profits.

progressoverpeace on March 10, 2009 at 1:51 AM

Uncertainty is whats screwing things up. He and Hillary running off busting up the joint with no real plan other promoting Communism is running us into the ground. This guy’s going in all directions and even reaching back into a past Presidency to screw up past elected officials work. Whats being done is not American in my opinion. I’m just waiting for one of our Allies or interests to get attacked and that’s gonna piss off a lot of people when nothing gets done about it or seeing how it could have been avoided.

Personally I’d like to close one China factory at a time by seeing us offer things in the USA, making U.S. jobs and putting ‘Made in the USA’ back on our labels. China just takes and takes and is just a big Buddah baby. Sure prices of said items will be up there a little, but these geniuses can figure a way to reciprocate that money back into OUR system instead of Chinas. Now he’s opening up Cuba. What the hell if to be gained doing that?

johnnyU on March 10, 2009 at 4:44 AM

What does Obama Want?

Kill all the babies, Send Obama all your money, Remove Rush from the air, Make us all communists…

sabbott on March 10, 2009 at 5:15 AM

All are problems very much fixable. The wrong remedies are being put forth. Too many hands in the till.

johnnyU on March 10, 2009 at 10:13 AM

What I have read on this thread and many others is the enactment of the European socialist mentality by the current MSM and administration.

In America, in the recent past, if you listened to someone on a street corner see someone being chauffeured in a Mercedes limo you were likely to hear them say, “One day I will be in that limo!”. The European says,” One day that person will be down here with us!”.

Quite a different view and one that has permeated the MSM for several years. The fact that achievers are berated, competition is squelched in our schools and local sports activities, all point to the European mentality of the public. If you want to be European, immigrate! The founders of this country decided a long time ago that they didn’t want to European, they wanted to be free and to make sure the federal government was crippled enough that it wouldn’t become the tyrant they were trying to get away from.

It is quite plain that we have allowed ourselves to become complacent in our diligence to keep the federal government at bay. When, and only when the masses see the government as a corrupted tyrant, will there be a shift back to the founders’ country. As long as the masses can be duped by way of public largess, the government will continue to become more totalitarian. When the government can not fill the outstretched hand, the masses will revolt. Its coming and you had better have a plan in place to deal with it. The urban areas will be first and then it will fan out to the suburbs.

The logical conclusion to this is a split nation, both politically and physically. The only way to achieve this is through armed conflict because those that want freedom will not be shackled to the socialist agenda and will not be subjugated to it.

Soon we will all have to decide whether we choose sides and take up arms or we throw away the ideologues and extremists that have taken us from the path the founding fathers set forth nearly 250 years ago, and cast off the bonds of the central government. This will be a time when everyone will have to take responsibility for their choice and live with the consequences of that decision.

belad on March 10, 2009 at 10:40 AM

Comment pages: 1 2 3