Whose audience is better informed?
posted at 10:44 am on March 8, 2009 by Ed Morrissey
Pew Research did a survey to test the audiences of various media outlets in order to determine how well each informs their listeners or viewers — and came up with some surprising results. They asked three questions based on current events, and then ranked the outlets by the percentage of their audience who got each right, and all three correct. A few surprises hit the top of the market (via Mark Impomeni):
When the Pew Research Center tested the public’s political knowledge earlier this year, the best-informed news audiences crossed the ideological spectrum. Nearly half of regular readers of The New Yorker, The Atlantic and Harper’s Magazine (48%) answered three political knowledge questions correctly. Regular listeners of NPR (44% three correct), and regular viewers of Hardball (43%) and Hannity & Colmes (42%) also fared well compared with other news audiences.
The survey, conducted April 30-June 1 among 3,612 adults ages 18 and over, found that about half of Americans (53%) knew that the Democrats have a majority in the House of Representatives, while 42% could identify the secretary of state (Condoleezza Rice). Fewer than three-in-ten (28%) could name the prime minister of Great Britain (Gordon Brown). Just 18% of the public answered all three questions correctly.
This follows on John Ziegler’s work at How Obama Got Elected, although in a less partisan manner. Ziegler also conducted his surveys of Obama and McCain voters to demonstrate the fecklessness of media coverage, a theme he put together as a documentary in Media Malpractice. Pew essentially finds the same problem working from the other direction — most of the mainstream media outlets fail to inform their audiences properly for political discourse.
Here is the top ten, as an example, with their aggregate scores:
- New Yorker/Atlantic – 48%
- NPR – 44%
- Hardball – 43%
- Hannity & Colmes – 42%
- Political magazines – 39%
- Rush Limbaugh – 36%
- Business magazines – 36%
- BBC – 34%
- Colbert Report – 34%
- News Hour (PBS) – 33%
Hannity and Rush were the only two outlets where over 80% of the audience could correctly identify the majority party in the House. Only a handful of others scored in the 70s. How did we do? Not too bad. “Online news” ranked 14th, with an aggregate score of 29%.
And where were the rest of the American media? In rather poor positions. In fact, ESPN — a sports network — outranked almost all of them:
- MS-NBC: 19th (25%)
- ESPN: 23rd (21%)
- NBC Evening News: 24th (21%)
- ABC News: 27th (19%)
- CNN: 28th (19%)
- Fox: 29th (19%)
- CBS News: 38th (10%)
Of all the listed news outlets above, only CBS failed to inform their audience well enough to get a majority that knew Democrats controlled the House. That’s really pathetic.










Blowback
Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.
Trackbacks/Pings
Trackback URL
Comments
Comment pages: « Previous 1 2
Love it! I hope that was a real letter!!!
JellyToast on March 8, 2009 at 3:40 PM
I remember this story. When it came out in October.
Free Constitution on March 8, 2009 at 4:06 PM
Media matters are the fact checkers? Any and every one that believes that is dumb!
There’s another name for media smatterings — Правда. “The Truth”, now that is indeed a laugh. Here’s another up your alley — Mors Mercurius fictus
AH_C on March 8, 2009 at 4:22 PM
This is not less than 6 months old… this was passed around the blogosphere way back during the campaign.
DaveS on March 8, 2009 at 4:22 PM
I’ve been saying that for years Jvette. I think the media pushed both the story and message from both OIF and OEF and used polls to track their progress in running both theaters into the toilet.
hawkdriver on March 8, 2009 at 4:23 PM
I am best informed by Rush and Levin.
jencab on March 8, 2009 at 4:24 PM
This is pathetic. An old survey is news to discuss? And then there’s the rehash-rehashing of the Rush comment. There must be real news to discuss somewhere.
Deanna on March 8, 2009 at 4:25 PM
Wow. You are the biggest joke of a poster. Media matters has more smear than your undershorts.
No, we will not accept liberal talking points as ‘proof’ that Rush is dishonest. Do your own research and link actual facts, otherwise stfu.
fossten on March 8, 2009 at 4:31 PM
http://www.sundriesshack.com/2009/03/08/rushs-critics-need-to-read-what-he-actually-said/
Mr. Joe on March 8, 2009 at 4:37 PM
Speaking of polls.
hawkdriver on March 8, 2009 at 4:50 PM
I don’t think polls like these mean much. Those shows that scored the highest you typically have to go out of your way to watch or listen to. So they are getting an audience that is more motivated to begin with. While network news is for lazy zombies who just don’t care.
NotCoach on March 8, 2009 at 5:07 PM
LOL
blatantblue on March 8, 2009 at 5:10 PM
You’ve got to understand lefties. A leftist slant is by definition “non-partisan”, since leftism/liberalism is self-evident truth. “Partisan” is only possible for those who are right-of-center.
ddrintn on March 8, 2009 at 5:14 PM
The numbers shouldn’t come as much of a surprise. The top ten are news sources that would tend to be frequented by those who are engaged. Whereas the network news outlets are generally watched by those who are killing time while they wait for American Idol to start.
oldernwiser on March 8, 2009 at 5:26 PM
It’s no wonder what with the propaganda mills springing up daily. This past week Twitter was called to the White House to ‘discuss the economy’. What?! After an incident last night, I wonder if the agenda is more sinister – an attempt to sway Twitter to either post propaganda or collect information for the White House (yeah I know it makes me sound like a conspiracy theorist, but read on). A friend sent me a silly quiz and when I went to take the quiz, a video popped up alongside and started playing. The video resembles some MTV type video with supposedly Obama’s voice narrating. Is it propaganda? You be the judge.
So with every media source just pounding the public with biased views and peeks at the ‘hip’ President and ‘one of the people’ portrayals of Obama and his crew, it’s no wonder the public is ignorant of the real issues.
jusgottabeme on March 8, 2009 at 5:41 PM
NPR??? Most of those I know who still listen to that tedious dreck think the polar bears are drowning because Gorebull Warming is melting the ice floes out from under them.
I tuned out NPR long ago upon noticing that they felt their challenged audience needs to hear faked sound effects of coffee cups clinking together to understand that an interview was taking place in a cafe. Nearly as bright as a weatherman on TV who thinks he has to be blown sideways by a hurricane to convince his audience that one exists.
viking01 on March 8, 2009 at 6:27 PM
Ouch! Better put some ice on that!
Del Dolemonte on March 8, 2009 at 6:28 PM
The big corporations who own the entire news media in America want the population ignorant. They want no competition! They want monopoly control over everything they do. And so to eliminate competition they would like to have a dumbed-down population that can’t compete.
apacalyps on March 8, 2009 at 6:30 PM
NPR actually used to do a decent job with the news. Then in the mid 1990s they entered into a partnership with the BBC.
The resulting marriage destroyed them both.
Del Dolemonte on March 8, 2009 at 6:31 PM
I know a lot of yuppies who like to (very) smugly announce that they only listen to NPR; Like that’s some brilliant badge of honor, or something.
Most disturbing aspect of the survey: 18% of Americans got all three questions correct?! No wonder we ended up with idiot boy.
anniekc on March 8, 2009 at 6:48 PM
Jvette on March 8, 2009 at 7:03 PM
Yes, things grew really intense in 2004 as the election grew closer. The MSM(traitors)demoralized with their news coverage and most definitely influenced opinion polls by reporting only the bad while ignoring the good.
My husband has been on the receiving end of many a rant about this very subject. Got to the point that we couldn’t even discuss the subject civilly. My husband is a Democrat by the way, as was I before becoming a better informed adult. Of course, I mean him no offense, he’s a good man.
Jvette on March 8, 2009 at 7:07 PM
Ed,
That story is from last year.
Slow news day at HotAir?
Yours in Christ,
The Joker.
TheJoker on March 8, 2009 at 7:42 PM
Not as far as Dems are concerned they don’t. The MSM tells you that everything is Bush’s fault and Obama can do no wrong.
angryed on March 8, 2009 at 8:44 PM
Sort of like the “meme”, there are no black racist.
Johan Klaus on March 8, 2009 at 9:03 PM
Five months old, but the data in it doesn’t age rapidly.
In particular, if they couldn’t identify them then, what has changed that they should be able to identify them now?
Oh, I forgot! The Gifts, and The “reset” button. So they ought to get at least two of the questions right now, but I’m betting they keep blaming the Republicans for Stimulus.
unclesmrgol on March 8, 2009 at 10:39 PM
The highest score was 48 percent. Does that mean that the majority don’t know what’s going on in this country and in the world? Pathetic. They probably all voted for Obama.
docdave on March 8, 2009 at 10:45 PM
William, as I am fairly new to politics, (only really been seriously in to it for the last 5 years), I’m learning a LOT from HA commenters. So I guess you are correct as I sure am not learning this information anywhere else.
SerenityFL on March 8, 2009 at 10:56 PM
Old news. Knew this a long time ago.
Ryan Gandy on March 8, 2009 at 11:18 PM
How can you you rate political knowledge in a meaningful way with a grand total of 3 questions? With only 3 questions to ask to attempt a rating, why would one of your questions be to name the current prime minister of England? The U.S. Secretary of State and the party controlling Congress are things everyone should certainly know, but the current prime minister of England for most Americans could almost be classified as trivia.
It’s probably that 3rd question that helped the liberal elitist magazines the most in the rating, since I doubt that Sean or Rush placed high priority in covering British politics during a presidential election year.
I think the poll can usefully highlight some audiences that are up on politics, but I think ranking them all numerically based on 3 questions would be a useless and futile effort.
ThereGoesTheNeighborhood on March 9, 2009 at 12:23 AM
So the conclusion is that the US is pretty much peopled with dumb-fucks. Encouraging.
Drum on March 9, 2009 at 12:50 AM
I agree everytime Obama says he “inheirited” this financial mess it makes me made. Obama was in the Senate… The Dems did the Fannie Fredie stuff and Obama took the money and then hired the crooks as his advisors… He certainly should take a chunk of blame for creating the banking failures… AS should the DEMOCRATIC CONGRESS!!!
This isn’t to say that Repubs didn’t do their part, but they have been held accountable!
So far the Dems have got away with murder! There has got to be some bad Karma in that for them though.
petunia on March 9, 2009 at 1:31 AM
Oh and in April and June of last year I probably would have had a tough time coming up with Gordon Brown’s name. He was new and Charisma is lacking… I regularly read the BBC online and I still don’t know if I would have come up with his name back then.
Sakozy I was following… But British PM not so much. But now under the new administration we don’t need to worry about who runs the UK they aren’t all that important anymore…/s
petunia on March 9, 2009 at 1:35 AM
petunia on March 9, 2009 at 1:35 AM
I just looked up Tony Blair’s bio and it said he served through 27June 2007. This survey ended on 1 Jun 2007 so unless they were asking who the new PM was going to be I am betting most answered Blair and would have been right.
What is important about surveys is what they do with the info- did they make any changes to their news formats to improve their listeners knowledge? Who wants to bet that Rush/Hannity did but the MSM didn’t because dumbing their viewers down IS their goal?
journeyintothewhirlwind on March 9, 2009 at 1:48 AM
Ok, before anyone corrects me I just realized my year mistake-ugh. I should not get out of bed to take the bread out of the breadmaker and try to post at 1am after a time change and after a bad night sleeping because the sump pump is going off every 5 seconds with all the rain and sounds like a child sucking the bottom of a drink through a straw!
Sorry. But if Obama can use the tired excuse, all of us can.
journeyintothewhirlwind on March 9, 2009 at 2:04 AM
How many could actually answer who wrote the Constitution? How many could answer who signed the Iraqi Liberation Act? How many could answer what HR114 is or tell you what the Posse Comitatus act WAS? For that matter, how many could pass the Imigration and Naturalization Test? How many could give you an ACTUAL definition of what the Acronym NAZI means?
By the way, this is ALL taught in JUNIOR HIGH HISTORY.
And we DARE to wonder how Obama managed to get elected?
nelsonknows on March 9, 2009 at 5:53 AM
NPR?? OK…where does one go to get the really cool fake elitist accent used on NPR? It’s kind of British, but they aren’t British so it isn’t British. So it’s kind of…well…fake but yet so “I’m so much smarter than you dumb asses”! It really is stunning to behold! It’s the perfect locution of words. You know the girl in school that everyone hated that pronounced every word perfectly but sounded like a twit? That’s NPR. Then they take the guys that want to work there, send them to the local vet and have their testicles removed, then teach them how to talk this way, add a slight British fake accent and we have NPR! Really quite lovely!
sabbott on March 9, 2009 at 6:15 AM
The audience over at mises.org is more informed than anyone in the world. It’s too bad they’re a minority
Libertarian Joseph on March 9, 2009 at 8:17 AM
Did they include the people that get all their news from SNL’s Weekend Update?
Candy Slice on March 9, 2009 at 8:36 AM
Thanks, now next time you post one of your ridiculous post like stating that Specter had already voted for the card check bill…I know where you got your mis-information.
It makes sense now, media matters is one of the most irresponsible internet sites…right along with dKos, another one of your favorites…yet you post here.
And BTW, the vote still hasn’t been taken…and you still think Specter has voted for it…
right2bright on March 9, 2009 at 9:58 AM
It is a mixture of British and Ivy League.
right2bright on March 9, 2009 at 9:59 AM
It may be even worse. I wonder how many of the MSM audience who got it right did so because they also have other sources (e.g., talk radio, online, etc.)? Unless the poll asked for major source and/or excluded those with additional sources, this might cover even worse MSM performance.
IrishEyes on March 9, 2009 at 3:58 PM
Comment pages: « Previous 1 2