Obama can’t break the teleprompter habit, either; Update: Tapper and Sawyer in August
posted at 5:10 pm on March 5, 2009 by Ed Morrissey
Rumors about Barack Obama’s addiction have crept around the capital for the last few weeks, but no one has wanted to explicitly report it until Politico did so this afternoon. Has Obama relapsed on smoking? Do his massive government spending plans indicate an acute gambling problem? No, in this case, Obama has another crutch:
President Barack Obama doesn’t go anywhere without his TelePrompter.
The textbook-sized panes of glass holding the president’s prepared remarks follow him wherever he speaks.
Resting on top of a tall, narrow pole, they flank his podium during speeches in the White House’s stately parlors. They stood next to him on the floor of a manufacturing plant in Indiana as he pitched his economic stimulus plan. They traveled to the Department of Transportation this week and were in the Capitol Rotunda last month when he paid tribute to Abraham Lincoln in six-minute prepared remarks.
Obama’s reliance on the teleprompter is unusual – not only because he is famous for his oratory, but because no other president has used one so consistently and at so many events large and small.
After the teleprompter malfunctioned a few times last summer and Obama delivered some less-than-soaring speeches, reports surfaced that he was training to wean himself off of the device while on vacation in Hawaii. But no luck.
This may be news to the throngs of Obamabots who elected him, but not to those of us who paid attention to Obama on the campaign trail. When he had the TelePrompters, he made crowds swoon. When he didn’t, though, things would go terribly wrong. Most of the fumbles on the campaign trail — such as Iran being a “tiny” and therefore no threat, America not being “what it once was”, came when Obama had to go off script. Once, his TelePrompter failed for a couple of moments and he stammered until someone apparently fixed it.
It’s not exactly news among the media, either, but they didn’t exactly trip all over themselves to report it. Give CNN a small credit for mentioning Obama’s crutch once in the midst of a flurry of criticism of Sarah Palin for her lack of extemporaneous talent:
The Democratic presidential nominee has never tried to hide the fact he delivers speeches off the device, though normally he doesn’t use one at standard campaign rallies and town hall events.
But the Illinois senator used a teleprompter at both his Colorado events Monday — making for a particularly peculiar scene in Pueblo, where the prompter was set up in the middle of what is normally a rodeo ring.
This came two weeks after the Obama campaign derided Palin for using a speechwriter, which CNN failed to mention in its report and which the rest of the media ignored. They liked painting Palin as some sort of empty suit, and heralding Obama as a secular messiah with wisdom rolling off his tongue at every occasion. They swallowed the meme gladly from Team Obama.
Look, a TelePrompter is a tool, like anything else, and using the right tool for the right job is part of competent performance. Using it a press briefings, though, looks more like Obama is helpless without a script than a man relying on technology for success. Had the media paid attention to Obama’s disastrous off-script performances during the campaign, he might not be at the podium at all now.
Update: The video’s been pulled, but Jake Tapper told Diane Sawyer in August about Obama’s TelePrompter crutch. Video here. And while I always enjoy my friend T-Steel’s posts, his criticism about this not being a real story runs a little cold when we count up the I-hate-Rush posts his co-bloggers have piled up over at TMV the last couple of weeks.










Blowback
Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.
Trackbacks/Pings
Trackback URL
Comments
Comment pages: « Previous 1 2 3 4 5 Next »
Nah, just a blindfold.
Y-not on March 5, 2009 at 6:30 PM
He isn’t dumb. He’s a radical leftist, and they have to keep him on a script or else what he really thinks about America will come spilling out and then the game’s over.
“People are bitter and clinging to their guns and their religion”
“We need to spread the wealth around”
The most telling comments he has made were the ones where he didn’t have the Teleprompter.
More prosaically, I wonder if he is farsighted and too vain to use reading glasses to read a speech or notes. The words on a Teleprompter can be made as big as you need them to see them.
rockmom on March 5, 2009 at 6:31 PM
Hey now everyone knows Chimpy only got in because of daddy…of course part of the reason Ogabe sealed his records is that that is actually true in his case…..
*schwing*
sven10077 on March 5, 2009 at 6:32 PM
LOL! You kids for the past 8 years have been telling us that Chimpy was an idiot and couldn’t string two words together without a teleprompter. Your hypocritical double standard is duly noted.
So are Carville and Begala paying you by the word, or what?
Del Dolemonte on March 5, 2009 at 6:32 PM
You mean a legitimate college grad is not a retard.
The consensus is that obama got in because of his grandparents, and his caramel skin, he ingratiated himself with his lefty profs, and was graduated gratuitously for the same reasons. Obama has refused to release his student transcripts. Ditto for his being granted presidency of the Harvard law review. Never wrote an article. The first and only president to have that dubious honor which bespeaks either of laziness or ineptitude.
He’s like Kramer on Seinfeld. A charming, disarming fellow who might schmooze well at cocktail parties, or find himself in front of cameras or in a Woody Allen film by serendipitous mistake, but one who is intellectually challenged and out of his depth wherever he trods. A hipster dufus.
keep the change on March 5, 2009 at 6:33 PM
Wouldn’t it be logical that someone of Barry’s superior intellect should have mastered the ability to speak extemporaneously by now? It IS something you should naturaly get better at, especially with all that “experience” the MSM assured us he had!
anniekc on March 5, 2009 at 6:34 PM
Rovin on March 5, 2009 at 6:25 PM
Disclaimer: My above post was a metaphorical rant and not intended to extract actual physical harm to any party mentioned in the post. (FBI and Secret Service, please knock and come right in, the doors unlocked)….. :)
Rovin on March 5, 2009 at 6:34 PM
…and why did he cancel those town hall debates he said he’d attend…this is why, the weasel.
Plus, will you agree that a Yale graduate is just as smart?
Entelechy on March 5, 2009 at 6:37 PM
You are only allowed to use the teleprompter in fifty states. Wonder which seven the messiah will leave out???
Dire Straits on March 5, 2009 at 6:37 PM
That’s reassuring. Because given the past days performance by Barack “price and earnings” Obama, he could surely have fooled most of us.
Norwegian on March 5, 2009 at 6:38 PM
Bush was not an eloquent speaker, but he wasn’t afraid to speak off the cuff. Obama can’t even do that.
That little comic about the teleprompter blackmailing obama for a raise hits too close to home
gatorboy on March 5, 2009 at 6:38 PM
The MSM and all its branches and factions have been pushing this man since he gave the Keynote speech at the Democrats National Convention is 2004. It was an ordinary speech very partisan in nature which would be expected for this type of event and clearly showed all his liberal socialist tendencies and fundamental beliefs. The myth of great speaker started here with an ordinary Keynote and has never abated since then. It is quite clear now that this was the start of his campaign for the presidency. The media immediately placed him as a man with a future and nary was a word ever uttered to challenge this concept but only to build on it.
The propaganda effort behind this man is unprecedented in American politics. It reaches into preschools, school books, primer brochures and books given to families with children for bedtime reading. Tributes to him appear on childrens’ T.V. and adult channels. An Internet email network is set up to reach millions of citizens over night who think they are just getting email from close friends to alert them of what to say and think on an issue and this is coordinated with what they will hear from the MSM. There are advertisements on Facebook every time he speaks and wants national exposure and easy links to it. No president living or dead has been given the treatment that Obama is getting not since that day many years ago when we stopped celebrating our great Presidents and teaching about them in American History. The organization managing all this cannot have him fumble in public anymore. The teleprompter is a must. You can only cover up slips so many times before even the dimmest bulbs start to notice.
rsl775 on March 5, 2009 at 6:38 PM
Many years ago I sold a home in A2 MI to a Harvard law PROFESSOR, and he was so dim I wouldn’t have trusted him to walk across the street by himself- He might have known law, but he wasn’t too sharp at life.
anniekc on March 5, 2009 at 6:39 PM
Maker’s Mark Bourbon is always therapeutic.
hillbillyjim on March 5, 2009 at 6:41 PM
BEST laugh of the day!
anniekc on March 5, 2009 at 6:41 PM
I love the “it’s 2009 and everyone uses a teleprompter” excuse. I once stood in front of a room of a couple of hundred people, explained pre-existing conditions and how they were determined, and all the processing involved. No notes, no teleprompter.
Yesterday, I explained to a few people how the DJIA works.
I guess if you’re not expected to know stuff, teleprompters are the way to go.
(I still love the term “Teleprompter Jesus” – it’s hilar.)
mjk on March 5, 2009 at 6:41 PM
Hope for a power failure. Wouldn’t it be funny if all of a sudden someone replaced the script with a Dr. Suess book or something.
Terrye on March 5, 2009 at 6:42 PM
DTMH,
A teleprompter for a long, important speech is one thing. Even then you should know the speech well enough to be able to compensate for a technical foul up the way Sarah Palin did.
If you have to have one just to function, it means you really don’t know your topic and furthermore, you know that you don’t know what you’re talking about.
Either that, or you’re so insecure and narcissistic about looking less than perfect you insist on having one there.
My vote is for a mix of the two with a lean towards O’s narcissism.
INC on March 5, 2009 at 6:43 PM
Yeah, you’re right. Only Harvard MBAs are retarded. See “Chimpy” Bush.
BTW, O’bama refused to be interviewed by O’Reilly in a live setting. He set the conditions for the interview. One of the conditions was “not on live tv”.
What was he afraid of?
Del Dolemonte on March 5, 2009 at 6:44 PM
Two-bagger.
hillbillyjim on March 5, 2009 at 6:46 PM
Hell, I’m glad he can’t. Can you imagine what the markets would be down if he spoke off the cuff?
BacaDog on March 5, 2009 at 6:46 PM
That raises a good point — not very “green” of Obama to use a teleprompter, is it?
Energy conservation for thee but not for me.
Then again, I suppose he is creating a whole slew of jobs by using this thing instead of his magnificent Harvard educated loaf.
Y-not on March 5, 2009 at 6:47 PM
Ginsberg and Breyer taught at Columbia and Harvard respectively and they can’t read that the 2nd amendment give the people the right to bear arms…
phreshone on March 5, 2009 at 6:48 PM
dude he keeps the White House at 81 degrees…..
the hypocrisy is almost Gore level…no scratch that he now goes on weekend joyrides to go eat in Chi-town on BarryForce 1…..
so he is either tied with Gore or ahead by an ear….
sven10077 on March 5, 2009 at 6:49 PM
He could reverse the evil greed of Reagan… Dow 953.20
phreshone on March 5, 2009 at 6:50 PM
heh…..part of why I laugh at all the doom and gloom…I’ve lived through worse thus far….now when the Happiness GRU starts up and the gulags start filling I won’t be able to say that….
sven10077 on March 5, 2009 at 6:55 PM
And for her, a flagon of bloodwine.
Jim Treacher on March 5, 2009 at 6:56 PM
He makes Chauncey Gardener look like Einstein.
JohnBissell on March 5, 2009 at 6:58 PM
Interesting that you mention this-there was a story out of O’bama’s “home state” in the Pacific this week about a 4th grader there whose Dad was returning from Iraq. His tour started before B. Hussein was elected, and his scheduled time to return home was also set before then.
This silly kid gave O’bama all of the credit for bringing her Daddy home. Isn’t that precious?
Del Dolemonte on March 5, 2009 at 6:59 PM
there is a decided movement in about 13% of the force to push “O’bambi is maximum leader” meme……
I’ll let you do the math.
sven10077 on March 5, 2009 at 7:03 PM
Iowahawk had some fun with this awhile back.
landshark on March 5, 2009 at 7:05 PM
Blackberry. Teleprompter. Dot Gov websites. You Tube Radio Address to Nation….
All the technology at his fingertips and the best he’s got is: “Gyrations in the market”, “Fits and Starts”; “Ups and Downs”??
TN Mom on March 5, 2009 at 7:05 PM
There is one situatiom where I have absolutely no problem with any President using a teleprompter-when giving a speech to the United Nations. One of our Presidents even used a teleprompter with phonetic prompts, which showed him how to correctly pronounce the names of foreign countries and their leaders.
If O’bama wants to use one when he speaks to the UN General Assembly, no problem.
Del Dolemonte on March 5, 2009 at 7:05 PM
I read this on “ScrappleFace” and had to pass it on . . . I just couldn’t help myself.
——————————————————
“Obama to Drop Shield if Russia Helps with Limbaugh
by Scott Ott for ScrappleFace”
rplat on March 5, 2009 at 7:05 PM
I can’t find the link right now, but there was a story not long ago about the Administration looking into technology to provide information during press conferences (I think one idea was to put a computer screen on the podium, so handlers could feed him information when unexpected questions came up.)
Haven’t seen it since, so I don’t know if it really was put into practice.
cs89 on March 5, 2009 at 7:10 PM
This post highlights a point I have been amazed has received so little comment in the recent Obama vs Rush kerfuffle. At CPAC, Rush stood behind a podium and riffed off the top of his head for a solid hour and a half with no notes, no teleprompter, and , in all probability no preliminary plan. He managed to produce a speech, that at least in segments, was a match, in power of ideas, inspiration and especially humor, for the best crafted political speeches that have been given in my lifetime. Admittedly it did drag on to long, but that seemed to me to be driven mostly by the highly enthusiastic response of the audience. In response, we’ve had Obama, his Democrat hack minions, and assorted Hollywood celebutards attempting to characterize Rush as just a fat, stupid monster. Given that, in similar circumstances, almost none of them could produce more than three consecutive simple declarative sentences without a Bidenlike attempt to floss with their Florschiem, I find their assessment of Rush’s relative intelligence to be highly ironic.
djaces on March 5, 2009 at 7:10 PM
Isn’t the uhbuhma “puzzle” coming together nicely now?
winston on March 5, 2009 at 7:12 PM
Here’s a classic example of the double standard our friends on the Left have regarding the use of teleprompters by the President:
http://articles.marco.org/80
Del Dolemonte on March 5, 2009 at 7:14 PM
Rush will allow Obama the use of a teleprompter if there is a debate.
Birdseye on March 5, 2009 at 7:15 PM
God I miss the 80s…
right4life on March 5, 2009 at 7:20 PM
Good point. I would compare it to those of the recent technology generation who know how to use computer programs and calculators to solve problems, but when asked to calculate something in their head or on a piece of paper when those technology tools are not available, they cannot do it. It’s the difference between understanding a concept and understanding how to use a piece of technology that understands the concept.
There’s a difference between knowing how to press the keypads for 28 + 29 = and getting 57 and actually knowing how to do the long addition of 8+9 = 17 carry the 1 + 2 + 2 = 57.
Back to Obama. He knows how to read and make words sound nice, but he doesn’t really know what he is saying or believe in what he is saying. It’s all empty rhetoric.
Michael in MI on March 5, 2009 at 7:20 PM
Limbaugh’s speech was basically a brilliant improvisation of many of the talking points he has been drilling for the past year. He just strung them all together into a coherent piece. I’m sure he could have recited it in his sleep.
It was almost as good as an extended jazz jam by John Coltrane and his band, or a flawless 6 part Tchaikovsky piece.
Del Dolemonte on March 5, 2009 at 7:22 PM
Obama derangement syndrome is on full display here. A college graduate doesn’t have to prove anything if he has a diploma from an accredited university. I wonder if you demanded to see GWB coarse work from Yale to make him prove that he earned his degree.
Obama graduated Magna Cum Laude from Harvard Law. He passed the bar. He was a college professor. Harvard doesn’t award honors to students because their minorities. What color you are is irrelevant when you take the bar. Irregardless how he got in, he excelled when he did.
Consensus of what, people that hate Obama? Do you have any proof for your ridiculous claims that Harvard professors give people high marks to students because they like them or because their a minority?
For the record, I don’t think Bush is a moron, even though I disagree with his policies. Anyone who has a degree from Yale, and can manage to read over a 100 books a year while president is an intelligent person. Why can’t some conservatives do the same with Obama?
Ric on March 5, 2009 at 7:22 PM
I was told there would be no math.
bookman on March 5, 2009 at 7:23 PM
Nah, Obama’s the tool
bartonbulletin on March 5, 2009 at 7:25 PM
Lightworker’s inability to work off-script certainly explains why his team was convinced that McCain cheated at Saddlerock, doesn’t it? It was apparently inconceivable to them that a candidate could think for himself.
Y-not on March 5, 2009 at 7:26 PM
He was an adjunct. Big whoop!
They certainly do. That’s a huge part of what motivated the changes they made to their grading, encouraging more subjectivity in the grades, along with the eligibility changes to the Law Review staff and President. And Magna Cum Laude is pretty pathetic for the Precedent of the Law Review. Amazingly pathetic.
progressoverpeace on March 5, 2009 at 7:26 PM
“Chimpy” was just a loving nickname and “Death of President” was a farce….
sven10077 on March 5, 2009 at 7:26 PM
Rush called it when he pointed out the filthy liar needed a teleprompter to announce his nominee for HHS. This is nothing more than a ceremonial announcement and the filthy liar couldn’t do it without a crutch.
Here’s hoping that when the next terrorist attack happens his teleprompter buddy is close at hand to tell him what to do.
highhopes on March 5, 2009 at 7:28 PM
Because he is a blithering idiot.
hillbillyjim on March 5, 2009 at 7:30 PM
djaces on March 5, 2009 at 7:10 PM
Limbaugh’s speech was basically a brilliant improvisation of many of the talking points he has been drilling for the past year. He just strung them all together into a coherent piece. I’m sure he could have recited it in his sleep.
It was almost as good as an extended jazz jam by John Coltrane and his band, or a flawless 6 part Tchaikovsky piece.
Del Dolemonte on March 5, 2009 at 7:22 PM
Can you name any politician or Hollywood celeb who could produce a similar improvisation? Certainly not the Won!
djaces on March 5, 2009 at 7:31 PM
We should make it a crime to smoke inside the Whitehouse!
Day after day more horrible news comes out about Obama… can we start saying “we told you so yet?”
petunia on March 5, 2009 at 7:32 PM
. . . Why can’t some conservatives do the same with Obama?
Ric on March 5, 2009 at 7:22 PM”
Outside of academia the man has done nothing of significant import. . . absolutely nothing. Even before Bush was president he was a fighter pilot and anybody that has flown a high performance fighter aircraft is one hell of a man or woman. And by the way, one must always remember to not let their formal schooling interfere with their education.
rplat on March 5, 2009 at 7:33 PM
I think Worf could if she was ever allowed to run totally unchained….
Aunt Esther seems to have a lot to say….
sven10077 on March 5, 2009 at 7:33 PM
he also passed the background check to get qualified on nuclear air to air missiles that were part of the F-102 platform….
Ogabe couldn’t be a clerk in some branches of the Army….
sven10077 on March 5, 2009 at 7:34 PM
President Teleprompter.
White House Chef: Sir, what will you like for dinner this evening?
** WH staffers scramble to assemble teleprompter poles **
awkward.
TN Mom on March 5, 2009 at 7:35 PM
I hadn’t thought of that–it certainly makes sense.
INC on March 5, 2009 at 7:36 PM
Bush’s transcripts are public record. Remember the fuss when it turned out he got better grades than Kerry?
My dear friend Ric, you must at least consider the possibility that Obama is a lunatic. What President in his right mind would day after day do what Obama is doing to the markets and go on and on pretending it is not happening and has nothing to do with him? The man is either a lunatic or he is colapsing the world’s economy on purpose.
petunia on March 5, 2009 at 7:37 PM
Forget the TP Odude,
Just get someone to program you an avatar so you can just ‘mail’ your speeches while you hang out around the corner taking a drag…
droofus on March 5, 2009 at 7:38 PM
Um. President Milli Vanilli? Is he Lip Synching?
/one must ponder the one term wonder. Too bad it sunk a nation in the process. Great job, Obama. Great job.
Key West Reader on March 5, 2009 at 7:38 PM
BacaDog on March 5, 2009 at 6:29 PM
Bush received his history degree at Yale & his MBA at Harvard.
youngTXcon on March 5, 2009 at 7:39 PM
Del Dolemonte on March 5, 2009 at 7:39 PM
As a former academic, I’d like to add that he has done nothing of note inside the ivory tower, either. No publications. No scholarly work. Teaching a few classes is not scholarship.
Y-not on March 5, 2009 at 7:39 PM
Today, the world will change. The oceans will calm. And we will have. Hope.
/Nope!
Key West Reader on March 5, 2009 at 7:40 PM
Aren’t all federal buildings supposed to be tobacco-free already?
bookman on March 5, 2009 at 7:42 PM
Ric on March 5, 2009 at 7:22 PM
He was not a professor, he was a teaching assistant (TA).
youngTXcon on March 5, 2009 at 7:42 PM
which is the academic version of “you want fries with that?”
sven10077 on March 5, 2009 at 7:44 PM
Oh, there are plenty of politicians who can do it. I’ve even seen Jesse Jackson give such speeches. As for Hollywood types, probably only a couple. Robert Redford has done it. But he’s in the minority.
It’s not all skill, a lot of it is passion about the message you’re delivering. As Limbaugh sincerely believed in what he was saying, he didn’t need a script.
Del Dolemonte on March 5, 2009 at 7:46 PM
Question for the scholars:
What happens if a fraud is elected? Meaning, specifically:
1. That his birth records have yet to be produced to show that he is a Natural Born Citizen, despite the power of subpoena served upon the Supreme Court of the USA.
2. That his school records have yet to be produced to refute the allegations that he was a “foreign exchange student from Indonesia”, despite the power of supboeana.
3. That his passport has never been produced, despite supoena.
4. That his adoption records filed by Mr. Obama’s father, Mr. Sotero have never been produced despite the power of subpoena?
What makes this man, usurper, crasher of the markets and destructor of America eligible to hold office?
Can someone answer these questions? What power does he have above the power of the rule of law and the power of subpoena?
Please, answer.
Key West Reader on March 5, 2009 at 7:47 PM
In both Rhetoric I & II, we were deducted a letter grade for relying heavily on notes. Just saying.
youngTXcon on March 5, 2009 at 7:49 PM
My spelling is atrocious. Gah.
Key West Reader on March 5, 2009 at 7:50 PM
As I recall, the evil Nancy Reagan made the White House itself smoke-free.
As for Barry, he told CNN shill Anderson Cooper he does not smoke “on the White House grounds”.
Del Dolemonte on March 5, 2009 at 7:51 PM
Actually, he was a Senior Lecturer. The U of C put out a statement about his appointment.
He was actively recruited for a tenure-track position, despite his lack of scholarly work — or accomplishments as a practicing attorney. Having been on faculty search committees, albeit in other academic fields, I can say that is… unusual.
Y-not on March 5, 2009 at 7:51 PM
No, he didn’t get high marks, he just got by. Proof is not available as obama refuses to disclose his transcripts. But, shall we say, it is the word on the Harvard street.
keep the change on March 5, 2009 at 7:52 PM
but not hard to reverse engineer….
and let’s be honest anyone with a JD is not going to be called a TA….
sven10077 on March 5, 2009 at 7:53 PM
Yeah, and he’s trustworthy and believable.
thomasaur on March 5, 2009 at 7:55 PM
sven10077 on March 5, 2009 at 7:53 PM
At my alma mater, an adjunct & a TA are on the same level. It’s a small private university, though…
youngTXcon on March 5, 2009 at 7:56 PM
We live in the Age of Information. Nearly every fact, idea, or thought that humanity has ever learned or created is almost instantly accessible. The measure of one’s intelligence in such an environment lies in one’s ability to separate the wheat from the chaff in the flood of information we are drowning in daily. Obama has demonstrated an uncanny ability to gather up the chaff while discarding the wheat. Every notion that he has taken to make up his core beliefs have been shown by history to be losers, socialism, moral relativism, and now global warming. His ignorance of history is evident every time he opens his mouth. In this sense our brains are much like computers, Garbage in, Garbage out.
djaces on March 5, 2009 at 7:57 PM
Okay, as much as I hate the filthy liar in the White House, there really needs to be some reason applied here.
If the filthy liar is lighting up in the Oval Office (a public space) it is wrong. But, the White House is also the residence so if the filthy liar wants to light up in the presence of his wife and kids in the private parts of the facility- go for it.
P.S. The only reason why I am against the filthy liar lighting up in the public spaces is because there are so many irreplaceable artifacts that would be damaged by the filthy liar’s addictions. Clinton exercised his addictions in the public spaces too but it was nothing that a steam cleaning couldn’t resolve.
highhopes on March 5, 2009 at 7:57 PM
Just for fun, someone should challenge him to give an important speech without a teleprompter. I’d like to see that.
youngTXcon on March 5, 2009 at 7:59 PM
Adjuncts and TA’s are about the same everywhere. The only difference is that TA’s are grad students and adjuncts are post-grads.
progressoverpeace on March 5, 2009 at 7:59 PM
I loathe the guy (and am unconvinced about his supposed “genius”), but a Senior Lecturer in a professional school (like a law school or a B-school) is a meaningful position… often one that is given to a person who is a leader in their field outside of the ivory tower.
Tenure-track positions are harder to come by. To take a tenure-track job and actually succeed at getting tenure, Obama would have had to actually do some scholarship in law and publish some peer-reviewed papers and/or a scholarly book.
Y-not on March 5, 2009 at 8:00 PM
I went to a really small (state) school. No adjuncts or TAs at all. I realize that this isn’t the norm but what a great education it provided.
highhopes on March 5, 2009 at 8:00 PM
Yeah forget trying to hack his crackberry. Someone should hack the telepromt and do what you suggest. Sh1t that would be funny.
Greed on March 5, 2009 at 8:01 PM
progressoverpeace on March 5, 2009 at 7:59 PM
Aha.
Some private universities have adjuncts that are still grad students. Lack of public funding, you know…
youngTXcon on March 5, 2009 at 8:02 PM
Thanks for the info. So, he was an adjunct-plus.
progressoverpeace on March 5, 2009 at 8:02 PM
highhopes on March 5, 2009 at 8:00 PM
Since it was an engineering school, my university only had TAs for science & math courses. Regardless, it was a better education than what some Ivy League schools have to offer.
youngTXcon on March 5, 2009 at 8:04 PM
Not necessarily. There are schools out there that are not publish/perish. The problem for the filthy liar would actually have to hold a job for a significant period of time. If he were to come into the university setting, he’d only become a professor with the understanding that he would be Dean of the college in a couple of years and President of the whole organization a couple years later.
The filthy liar has never EVER held a position long enough to make an impact. I’m hoping that extends to this evil regime he currently is figureheading.
highhopes on March 5, 2009 at 8:05 PM
I remember people in grad school who were adjuncts at other schools, but I’ll take your word for other places. In any event, we all know what level the idiot messiah was working at.
progressoverpeace on March 5, 2009 at 8:06 PM
indeed as I said it is not hard to reverse engineer…
sven10077 on March 5, 2009 at 8:07 PM
And he still sounds like bumbling buffoon.
SouthernGent on March 5, 2009 at 8:09 PM
Yeah, my background is not in this field, but as I understand it it’s not unusual for former politicians, ex-judges, or whatnot to get these sorts of jobs. If the person was accomplished in their field — but they didn’t publish academic papers or books — then the Senior Lecturer position provides the prestige of a faculty slot and brings prestige to the institution by having that person associated with them.
The part that seems odd to me is that at the time Obama was hired by the U of C (which is my alma mater, incidentally) he had really accomplished very little, either in the legal profession or in politics.
I accept that he may have been good in the classroom, but to be recruited several times for a tenure-track (aka “real”) faculty position without a single scholarly publication is bizarre.
I’m sorry to say that I suspect the U of C’s eagerness to recruit Obama reflects more than even the desire to hire a minority faculty member. It really appears to be because of the “favors” Obama did for the university.
Really disgusting.
Y-not on March 5, 2009 at 8:09 PM
Mmmm. All this talk makes me hungry for pie.
Pie pie pie pie pie pie
Remember on the campaign trail when teleprompter failed he said pie 21 times in one minute because he was completely lost.
pie pie pie pie
Rockygold on March 5, 2009 at 8:10 PM
I want to see Jake Tapper ask Gibbs a question about this. Speaking of Gibbs, maybe he should use Obama’s prompter…
youngTXcon on March 5, 2009 at 8:10 PM
Comment pages: « Previous 1 2 3 4 5 Next »