Hope and Change: The Operation Rushbo Distraction

posted at 12:30 pm on March 4, 2009 by Ed Morrissey

If the first six weeks of the Barack Obama administration can be summed up in one sentence, it would be this: Obama fiddled with Rush Limbaugh while Wall Street burnedPolitico reports that the demonization of Rush Limbaugh comes as a deliberate strategy by Obama and the Democrats, who hoodwinked people into believing that a Chicago Machine pol really wanted to change the partisan nature of politics.  Starting in October, Obama relied on an old hand in attack politics to devise this strategy — and rolled it out even in the middle of an economic meltdown:

Top Democrats believe they have struck political gold by depicting Rush Limbaugh as the new face of the Republican Party, a full-scale effort first hatched by some of the most familiar names in politics and now being guided in part from inside the White House.

The strategy took shape after Democratic strategists Stanley Greenberg and James Carville included Limbaugh’s name in an October poll and learned their longtime tormentor was deeply unpopular with many Americans, especially younger voters. Then the conservative talk-radio host emerged as an unapologetic critic of Barack Obama shortly before his inauguration, when even many Republicans were showering him with praise.

Soon it clicked: Democrats realized they could roll out a new GOP bogeyman for the post-Bush era by turning to an old one in Limbaugh, a polarizing figure since he rose to prominence in the 1990s.

Read all of Jonathan Martin’s report, which makes clear that Carville and Paul Begala coordinated this effort with Obama chief of staff Rahm Emanuel on their morning conference calls.  Clearly, Obama wants to use his media contacts to play rough with critics through coordinated personal-attack campaigns.  Martin neglects to mention, though, that Obama himself started off this attack by telling Republicans that they can’t listen to Limbaugh any longer if they want to have access to Democratic-controlled agendas on the Hill.

So far, Obama’s attack machine — and there’s no other term for it — has mostly succeeded.  While the markets have lost 18% of their value in the six weeks of his leadership, all Democrats can talk about is Rush.  Newspapers and media have followed suit, and so have the blogs.  Usually excellent sites like The Moderate Voice and Political Machine have turned themselves into almost nothing but anti-Limbaugh sites, where Jazz Shaw’s light satire of the trend gets completely subsumed in the overwhelming focus on someone who has no direct power on policy or enforcement.  Instead of focusing attention on the real policy leaders in Washington — all Democrats — whose every move has received a resounding vote of no confidence from investors, they have allowed themselves to get distracted by a deliberate strategy of misdirection originating in the highest levels of the White House.

It’s reminiscent of Nixon’s enemies list, and it comes from the supposed messiah of Hope and Change.

Rush Limbaugh provides commentary, criticism, analysis, and entertainment, not political leadership, as Rush himself would attest.  He has an audience of 20 million people, which makes attacks on him by people like Michael Steele and other Republicans rather stupid.  Instead of dividing the Right, they would do better to act as Bobby Jindal did and find ways to unite the Right.  But with Republicans out of power, this is mere sideshow.  It’s a circus provided by Democrats to cover up their economic incompetence and massively ineffective spending programs.  It’s also a harbinger of things to come as this administration fumbles one issue after another, as they will only need to expand the personal attacks against critics rather than respond to the criticism itself.

Operation Rushbo only succeeds if people swallow it.

Update (AP): Boehner called it a “distraction” today too but I think that misses the point. Economic ruin will be with us long after this dust-up with Rush has blown away, which is to say, in the long run this won’t distract anyone from anything. What the Democrats are really trying to do is rebrand the GOP. They’re keenly attuned to that sort of thing, as we were reminded again just yesterday. I also wouldn’t call what they’re doing to Rush an “attack.” It’s more like promotion, albeit promotion for their own ends. In fact, if there’s anyone who benefits unambiguously from all this, it’s Rush himself. The Democrats might miscalculate in overestimating his supposed unpopularity, and the GOP leadership will go on squirming at having to defend or reject the idea of wanting Obama to fail, but all Limbaugh has to worry about is an expanding audience. His show has never seemed so vital as it does right now, which is precisely why lefties like Peter Daou are starting to worry.

Update (Ed): We’re going to agree to disagree.  I think this article makes the case quite clear that this is an attack policy devised by experienced hands from the Clinton administration at attack politics.  Whether that “rebrands” the GOP is probably secondary; as Carville himself once famously noted, “Your opponent can’t hit back when you have your fist in his face.”  So much for changing the tone in Washington.

Blowback

Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.

Trackbacks/Pings

Trackback URL

Comments

Comment pages: 1 2 3 4 5 9

Perhpas you’ve missed what happens to people who have their “profile raised” by the Left. Shall I remind you?

TheBigOldDog on March 4, 2009 at 1:14 PM

We needed this to happen. Whether you agree that Rush is the head of our party, he is certainly the voice of it now. We need to get behind him and push this in Dear Leader’s face til he can’t back down. America needs this feud.

genso on March 4, 2009 at 1:16 PM

I have to say Rush is kicking ass today. And this is the very first time I have ever listened to his show online. I can’t imagine how many MORE people are listening to him today than ever before.

If this is a strategy to take him down, it’s a damn strange one.

rockmom on March 4, 2009 at 1:16 PM

Presumably the victim of a White House “targeted attack” is suffering because of it. What’s the nature of his suffering?

I don’t believe he is suffering.

But what the Obama regime has done is to deliver a swift kick in the nuts to anyone whose beliefs align to those of Rush.

If Bush would have ever wasted his time attacking professional liar Michael Moore during the Iraq War, the left would have been apoplectic and rightfully show.

We have a full scale economic meltdown on our hands and the Chief of Staff in the White House is spending his time attacking one private American citizen who has broken no laws.

NoDonkey on March 4, 2009 at 1:16 PM

Nothing is new in politics. The D’s have been trying to turn Rush into Father Coughlin since he first came to prominence. Ultimately it won’t work, but that doesn’t matter to Obama et al. As long as the nation is preoccupied/distracted by this spitball fight, the other more important issues are being ignored.

Mr. D on March 4, 2009 at 1:16 PM

What’s the nature of his suffering?

Allahpundit on March 4, 2009 at 1:13 PM

We are still in preparatory stages. Step one is vilify Limbaugh and others on the right, who are the public voice of conservatism. (Keep in mind that the MSM who are participating in this are the arbiters of what GOP talking points get on the air.) Step two is to use polling to show how majorities don’t want this ‘trash’ on the radio, unanswered. Step three is the fairness doctrine.

Vashta.Nerada on March 4, 2009 at 1:17 PM

Obama’s trying to stain Republicans with Rush’s (alleged) unpopularity.
Allahpundit on March 4, 2009 at 1:08 PM

Nope, it’s designed to keep the public’s eye off the tanking economy while the humongous Omnibus bill gets rammed through Congress…
That’s not working,either, though–Both Sen. Evan Bayh and Russ Feingold–Democrats–are objecting to passing the bill.
This Rush “dirty trick” (a la Nixon) is also designed to stifle any vocal opposition in general and Rush in particular by trying to publicly demonize, shame and ridicule it/him for speaking out.
Needless to say, their attacks dogs, like Carville, have never had to pay a similar price.
If the Democrat Left can get movies stars to bash Bush–which they did by the truckload for 8 years, why can’t we use Rush to bash MaObama?

Jenfidel on March 4, 2009 at 1:17 PM

I think I’ve listened to Rush maybe two times (and only for a few minutes), but I am tempted more and more to listen to him because he is the news.

Indeed. This is a simple bet: The Democrats are betting that that phenomenon will increase their chances in the midterms and Rush is betting that it’ll increase the GOP’s chances. Both agree, though, that the higher Rush’s profile is, the better.

Allahpundit on March 4, 2009 at 1:17 PM

Repeat of a question asked above: What “harm” has Rush suffered from all this? Presumably the victim of a White House “targeted attack” is suffering because of it. What’s the nature of his suffering?

Allahpundit

The believers will not be swayed by obama on this issue, the target here is the moderates. obamas attacks on Rush are aimed at making anyone who opposes obama a “right wing wacko” like Rush. The extremes will not change thier minds. This is an attack on the idea that you can disagree with obama and not be a right wing wacko.

sonofdy on March 4, 2009 at 1:18 PM

Whether you agree that Rush is the head of our party, he is certainly the voice of it now.

Agreed.

I don’t always agree with him, but he’s more of a man, more of American and more of a thinker than the cheap sideshow fraud Obama could ever hope to be.

NoDonkey on March 4, 2009 at 1:18 PM

LOL. Truly. Your argument rests on Obama &co. knowing when to stop. I think we’ll just have to disagree as well.

JiangxiDad on March 4, 2009 at 1:16 PM

loose translation thus far seems to be….

well yeah the White House is playing croquet with media figures while the Street iu taking retirement funds with it in a bonfire of the vanities but by gadfry as long as the calling out stops with hosts who have listner polls of say 15 million or more I fail to see an issue….

“hope”

sven10077 on March 4, 2009 at 1:18 PM

I wish we could channel Rush into our republican leadership….he brought down the house at CPAC, I know, preaching to the choir, but he was concise and articulate about our conservative values and ideals.
He clearly explained what we stand for and demonstrated the differences between conservatives and those that are trying to ruin our country right now.
If our republican leadership, McConnell and Boehner could give the same sort of passion and conviction that Rush gave at CPAC when explaining WHY they oppose the path that Nancy and Harry are taking us down, gave the citizens an alternative that made sense, not just saying that they OPPOSE it and mumble through an answer why, then we could invigorate the silent majority.
We need a mouth like Rush to take back our country. Lead the charge, win in 2010 and 2012.

HornetSting on March 4, 2009 at 1:18 PM

If Gibbs wants to get up at today’s presser and declare Hot Air the most influential conservative blog in the country, I assure you, no tears will be shed.

Allahpundit on March 4, 2009 at 12:59 PM

I wonder how different you’d feel if he blew your cover, named you buy name and made you the center of his ire?

TheBigOldDog on March 4, 2009 at 1:06 PM

This coming from someone who doesn’t disclose his real name or identity. It’s easy to say that while using an anonymous moniker, than to have your real name, picture, location, et. al. disclosed nationally. Think JTP. I wonder if you’d shed tears then?

conservative pilgrim on March 4, 2009 at 1:18 PM

You know you are heading down a dark dangerous road when your national leader is trying to destroy private citizens who disagree with him.

sonofdy on March 4, 2009 at 1:08 PM

You mean like Clinton did, with the IRS and FBI files?

MarkTheGreat on March 4, 2009 at 1:19 PM

MadisonConservative on March 4, 2009 at 1:12 PM

I certainly never laughed at anyone who rejected him, and I doubt you were ever a true supporter of McCain, even though I can appreciate your not wanting Obama enough to vote for him (if you did).

On the matter of alternatives, even while we lambast bloated, stale, failing corporations for taking bailouts instead of closing and making way for new companies, we continue to “bailout” the bloated, failing GOP.

True leaders will never arise in the GOP, because men with integrity would have nothing to do with it.

TMK on March 4, 2009 at 1:19 PM

Both agree, though, that the higher Rush’s profile is, the better.

Allahpundit on March 4, 2009 at 1:17 PM

If I came to believe that Rush is in it only for Rush, as you do, I’d just go away.

JiangxiDad on March 4, 2009 at 1:19 PM

The believers will not be swayed by obama on this issue, the target here is the moderates. obamas attacks on Rush are aimed at making anyone who opposes obama a “right wing wacko” like Rush. The extremes will not change thier minds. This is an attack on the idea that you can disagree with obama and not be a right wing wacko.

sonofdy on March 4, 2009 at 1:18 PM

+1….

we are witnessing everything they ranted about “Disagreeing with Bush is the highest form of Patriotism” turned on its head in less than a month and a half….

“change you can believe in”…

sven10077 on March 4, 2009 at 1:19 PM

That’s awesome – I’d put it on a T shirt if I could fit it all…

Vashta.Nerada on March 4, 2009 at 1:09 PM

Credit where credit is due, it was moxie_neanderthal who caught this back in the idiot messiah/Gordon Brown thread.

And it was even FAR WORSE and dumber than I just said. The Precedent is such a blithering idiot that he didn’t even get the factors of the ratio correct. He replaced “price” with “profit”!! Unreal. Truly unreal.

Profit and Earnings Ratio=Quayle’s “Potatoe” moment but nary a snicker.

moxie_neanderthal on March 3, 2009 at 8:40 PM

“Profit and earnings ratios” … G-d help us with this impenetrable moron.

progressoverpeace on March 4, 2009 at 1:19 PM

Nope, it’s designed to keep the public’s eye off the tanking economy while the humongous Omnibus bill gets rammed through Congress…

This nonsense with Rush isn’t taking anyone’s eye off anything. To believe that it is, you have to explain how (a) they’re going to stretch this out for the next two or three years, and (b) why on earth anyone would care more about what’s happening to Rush Limbaugh than to their 401k. It’s a momentary media diversion but they’ll get tired of it soon enough.

Allahpundit on March 4, 2009 at 1:19 PM

We needed this to happen. Whether you agree that Rush is the head of our party, he is certainly the voice of it now. We need to get behind him and push this in Dear Leader’s face til he can’t back down. America needs this feud.

genso on March 4, 2009 at 1:16 PM

It’s already happened to him. The Dems in FL went after his medical records and then there was the incident with his manhood script. Remember?

TheBigOldDog on March 4, 2009 at 1:19 PM

Could be. I’m sure Rush thinks so. I’m just surprised more Rush fans don’t seem to agree, and are grumbling about his profile being raised instead of celebrating it.

Allahpundit on March 4, 2009 at 1:16 PM

I’m celebrating it and I’m a big, long-time Rush fan.
I have no doubt that he has several million more listeners this week than he did last.

Jenfidel on March 4, 2009 at 1:20 PM

It worked so well for Clinton, right?

When did Clinton start his crusade against Rush? Before or after 1994?

meep on March 4, 2009 at 1:20 PM

…the Precedent knows so little about the stock market that he spoke about “the price and earnings ratio” during his little answering session with Gordon Brown…
progressoverpeace on March 4, 2009 at 1:06 PM

Hahahahaha! I missed that. Did he actually say “price and earnings ratio”? What a poseur. Such hubris. Unbelievable.

Mr. Obama, hot tip for you: Less time playing basketball and a little time on Economics/Finance 101.

Mr. Steel, how about some TV ads spotlighting Obama’s “price and earnings ratio”?

petefrt on March 4, 2009 at 1:20 PM

Rush…a potent force to be dealt with. They made him an issue, now they need to follow through and have the debate. Otherwise they look like the bully who pokes his finger in a guy’s chest and then runs home to hide under mommy’s skirt when the guy takes after him.

scalleywag on March 4, 2009 at 1:21 PM

You mean like Clinton did, with the IRS and FBI files?

MarkTheGreat on March 4, 2009 at 1:19 PM

This has the potiental of being much worse because they don’t seem to give a damn anymore who knows.

sonofdy on March 4, 2009 at 1:21 PM

Allahpundit on March 4, 2009 at 1:19 PM

We agree there. This is simply about control. Everything that challenges his control is under assault.

TheBigOldDog on March 4, 2009 at 1:21 PM

But what the Obama regime has done is to deliver a swift kick in the nuts to anyone whose beliefs align to those of Rush.

LOL a swift kick that would have been avoided if the Dems and Obama weren’t orchestrating this GOP=Obama strategy? It’s astounding the number of conservatives whose political ideology begins and ends with Rush Limbaugh, it’s like they have no other reference point for their beliefs. If Rush is attacked THEY are attacked. The swift kick in the nuts to conservatism isn’t legislation, it’s attacking Rush Limbaugh. This, btw, is the EXACT logic that has caused people like Gingrey and Steele to apologize to Rush. They can’t say “I disagree with Rush Limbaugh and I’m a strong conservative” in the same sentence without a significant portion of the GOP crying foul.

DeathToMediaHacks on March 4, 2009 at 1:21 PM

You mean like Clinton did, with the IRS and FBI files?

MarkTheGreat on March 4, 2009 at 1:19 PM

SSDD

What did you all think was going to happen when Rahm was named Chief of Staff? We’re getting all the thuggery and leftwing radical policies, without Dick Morris to warn about the overreaching.

rockmom on March 4, 2009 at 1:21 PM

Good Lord, do Obama and his thug media henchmen see themselves as modern day Goodfella’s, or what?

anniekc on March 4, 2009 at 1:21 PM

It’s already happened to him. The Dems in FL went after his medical records and then there was the incident with his manhood script. Remember?

TheBigOldDog on March 4, 2009 at 1:19 PM

And they didn’t shut him up. We need to get behind Rush on this. If he’s not afraid, why should we be?

genso on March 4, 2009 at 1:21 PM

Rove’s attack strategy in 2006: http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/01/20/AR2006012001853.html.

The difference is that the dems are going Limbaugh because the rest of the GOP is so weak.

jim m on March 4, 2009 at 1:21 PM

Think JTP. I wonder if you’d shed tears then?

How did JTP enter this discussion? We’re talking about Rush, a guy who’s already nationally famous and well known. In JTP’s case, there was an invasion of privacy; I railed about it multiple times on this blog. Which aspect of Rush’s privacy has been invaded?

Allahpundit on March 4, 2009 at 1:22 PM

Indeed. This is a simple bet: The Democrats are betting that that phenomenon will increase their chances in the midterms and Rush is betting that it’ll increase the GOP’s chances. Both agree, though, that the higher Rush’s profile is, the better.

Allahpundit on March 4, 2009 at 1:17 PM

Of course, it’ll all hinge on where things stand in 2010. In 1994, we’d had the health-care reform fiasco and House scandals, among other things.

I think someone’s mentioned that Pelosi and Reid need to be made the targets, not Obama. I think that’s what needs to be done.

ddrintn on March 4, 2009 at 1:22 PM

What’s the nature of his suffering?

Allahpundit on March 4, 2009 at 1:13 PM

Well he will probably have to hire another tax attorney to make extra sure that his tax return this year is absolutely pristine.

MB4 on March 4, 2009 at 1:22 PM

Both agree, though, that the higher Rush’s profile is, the better.

Allahpundit on March 4, 2009 at 1:17 PM

And if Rush loses, the Dems win.

And if Rush wins, the Dems will push his animosity and public profile as an example of why we need a “fairness doctrine” and all of Obama’s failures will be laid at Rush’ feet and the Dems win.

Calling STEELE!! Calling STEELE!! The phone is ringing…

Skywise on March 4, 2009 at 1:22 PM

Vashta.Nerada on March 4, 2009 at 1:17 PM

Word.

It’s a calculated plan, they aren’t about to fire their wad in one shot.

Bishop on March 4, 2009 at 1:22 PM

We needed this to happen. Whether you agree that Rush is the head of our party, he is certainly the voice of it now. We need to get behind him and push this in Dear Leader’s face til he can’t back down. America needs this feud.

I agree, actually. The only problem with this fight is the stupid comments on the right such as Rush is ugly, etc. It’s best those people just get out of the way.

Spirit of 1776 on March 4, 2009 at 1:22 PM

Well he will probably have to hire another tax attorney to make extra sure that his tax return this year is absolutely pristine.

MB4 on March 4, 2009 at 1:22 PM

And bodyguards.

genso on March 4, 2009 at 1:22 PM

but by gadfry as long as the calling out stops with hosts who have listner polls of say 15 million or more I fail to see an issue….

“hope”

sven10077 on March 4, 2009 at 1:18 PM

have nothing to say.

JiangxiDad on March 4, 2009 at 1:23 PM

one problem we have, and witnessed at CPAC with Paul getting some support.(65% of those at CPAC were under 25) is they too, not just other younger Americans, Hate Rush Limbaugh and conservatives.

though this group thinks its them, and the Paul/Rockwell types, that are the only True Republicans and Conservatives. and Rush Limbaugh and Bush and GOP at large are not Conservatives, hijacked the party and its their duty to take it back.

a fairy tale, but they beleive it. They’ve been told as such at college and on the Internet/youtube with little challenges to the absurd arguments and they are eating it up

jp on March 4, 2009 at 1:23 PM

And Rove and Bush never did the same thing? Sorry, Ed, but your sense of outrage seems misguided.

jim m on March 4, 2009 at 1:14 PM

If you are so convinced that Rove and Bush did the same thing, it should be trivial for you to cite some examples.

I notice that you failed to provide any supporting documentation in this first post.

MarkTheGreat on March 4, 2009 at 1:23 PM

Allahpundit on March 4, 2009 at 1:13 PM

Poor AP. You just can’t seem to get through to people today. At this rate you’ll have to change your name to SisyphusPundit. :P

TheUnrepentantGeek on March 4, 2009 at 1:23 PM

On the matter of alternatives, even while we lambast bloated, stale, failing corporations for taking bailouts instead of closing and making way for new companies, we continue to “bailout” the bloated, failing GOP.

True leaders will never arise in the GOP, because men with integrity would have nothing to do with it.

TMK on March 4, 2009 at 1:19 PM

We’re in total agreement, but proposing to abandon the GOP as a sinking ship will only leave conservatives in a far more vulnerable position. We’re left with two alternatives:

1. Recapture the GOP with conservative values. It’s consistently worked in past.

2. Create a third party, potentially draining the GOP and possibly some blue dogs. This new party will likely be painted as fringe by the media and will take a HELL of a long time to grow to relevance, because the GOP will be working to derail it just as much as the Dems.

Which really seems better to you?

MadisonConservative on March 4, 2009 at 1:23 PM

Gibbs and Obama’s media surrogates (the ones that are directly connected to Obama himself through Emanuel) are using a contorted framing of his viewpoint to marginalize him. They are attacking Rush, the man, as opposed to responding to his arguments. I.e. Rush hates Obama because he is a person that puts partisanship before country. That is the definition of attack politics, to destroy the messenger before his message can be delivered.

That this would redound to Rush’s benefit in terms of ratings does not take away from the fact that they are attacking him.

Obama is using the Oval Office to settle political scores, assure patronage for his cronies and garner wealth for himself. He has the soul of a crook. Now he has the power to make it known to the world.

Too bad he’ll get us all killed in the process of defiling himself.

spmat on March 4, 2009 at 1:23 PM

And they didn’t shut him up. We need to get behind Rush on this. If he’s not afraid, why should we be?

genso on March 4, 2009 at 1:21 PM

They came close but the point is, this isn’t just about verbal jousting. Not when it comes to the Left.

TheBigOldDog on March 4, 2009 at 1:24 PM

Well he will probably have to hire another tax attorney to make extra sure that his tax return this year is absolutely pristine.

If the Clintons didn’t get him, the glue sniffing juvenile delinquents in the Obama-Mugabe administration, sure won’t.

NoDonkey on March 4, 2009 at 1:24 PM

Poor AP. You just can’t seem to get through to people today. At this rate you’ll have to change your name to SisyphusPundit. :P

TheUnrepentantGeek on March 4, 2009 at 1:23 PM

He still can’t admit Gibbs purposely smeared Rush’s comments, what’d you expect?

Pasalubong on March 4, 2009 at 1:24 PM

Obama should learn from the disgraced and impeached Bill Clinton. It was always magical watching Bill’s cheeks ad his little pig-eyes turn red as he mentioned Rush Limbaugh by name.

Two Presidents later, Rush is still more of a man than Clinton ever was.

jeff_from_mpls on March 4, 2009 at 1:24 PM

Obama fiddled with Rush Limbaugh while Wall Street burned.

I swear I just thought this would be a perfect political cartoon. It is the perfect visual for what Obama’s focus has been. Americans lose a couple trillion in wealth in the market and Obama is concerned about nailing Rush Limbaugh. He is in continual campaign mode.

msmveritas on March 4, 2009 at 1:24 PM

“Profit and earnings ratios” … G-d help us with this impenetrable moron.

progressoverpeace on March 4, 2009 at 1:19 PM

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/29502780/

‘Long-term perspective’
Obama urged Americans not to obsess over the stock market, which he likened to a political tracking poll. “You know, it bobs up and down day to day,” the president said. “And if you spend all your time worrying about that, then you’re probably going to get the long-term strategy wrong.”

Video
Bernanke sees increased credit lending
March 3: CNBC’s Erin Burnett reports that Fed. Chair Ben Bernanke sees an increase in consumer lending, and endorsed federal deficit spending while recognizing the risk of such borrowing.

MSNBC

He even seemed to make an unusual foray into investment advice. “What you’re now seeing is profit and earning ratios are starting to get to the point where buying stocks is a potentially good deal if you’ve got a long-term perspective on it,” he said.

and the newsies make narry a peep….

imagine if Bush had made the same error…..

sven10077 on March 4, 2009 at 1:24 PM

This nonsense with Rush isn’t taking anyone’s eye off anything.

Remember when it was conservatives who were accusing progressives and Dems of thinking Americans were too stupid to see issues from our side and called us elitists. This thread (and so many others) are full of people calling the American people too stupid to see the “real” Obama, too stupid to walk and chew gum at the same time and so stupid that they literally think Americans were born yesterday i.e. believe that life/history began in January of 2009. I’ll say it till someone responds, NOW who is the elitist?

DeathToMediaHacks on March 4, 2009 at 1:24 PM

You know, something’s bothered me for a while now. Why in the world would CNN broadcast all of Rush’s CPAC speech??

BigWyo on March 4, 2009 at 1:25 PM

Operation Rushbo only succeeds if people swallow it.

Well, you have to give the Democrats credit: They’ve taken a self-absorbed, drug-addled, loudmouth cow and made him the face of the GOP. That’s smart.

paul006 on March 4, 2009 at 1:25 PM

progressoverpeace on March 4, 2009 at 1:06 PM

Sheesh, prog, the list of Osama Obamaisms is so long now it dwarfs the supply of Bushisms! Put ‘em in 5-point type and they’d fill the NYT.

That’s only malapropisms and instances of total stupidity/ignorance and doesn’t count his plain, everyday lies, of course.

It’s time for the child-president to go.

That said, Rash Fatblob must be feelin’ that old-time tingle running down his leg. You couldn’t buy the kind of attention he’s getting from the Messiah and his stupid Dem lapdogs; it would cost more than “EIB One.”

I can’t stand the guy, though when he voices serious policy opinions — as opposed to the near-constant self-back-patting — he’s pretty much right on.

MrScribbler on March 4, 2009 at 1:25 PM

t worked so well for Clinton, right?

When did Clinton start his crusade against Rush? Before or after 1994?

meep on March 4, 2009 at 1:20 PM

It started when Rush went after Hillarycare in 1993 and helped to kill it. That was Rahm’s baby as muh as Hillary’s. He’s back at it again, he thinks he got a do-over and he wants Limbaugh marginalized so he can’t stop Rahm’s leftwing agenda this time.

rockmom on March 4, 2009 at 1:25 PM

If there is any justice in this world, Joe Biden will weigh in on this soon!

Christien on March 4, 2009 at 1:25 PM

Carville and Begala, what a couple of maroons.

Bic on March 4, 2009 at 1:25 PM

How did JTP enter this discussion? We’re talking about Rush, a guy who’s already nationally famous and well known. In JTP’s case, there was an invasion of privacy; I railed about it multiple times on this blog. Which aspect of Rush’s privacy has been invaded?

Allahpundit on March 4, 2009 at 1:22 PM

His medical records. Can you get any more private than that?

TheBigOldDog on March 4, 2009 at 1:25 PM

They came close but the point is, this isn’t just about verbal jousting. Not when it comes to the Left.

TheBigOldDog on March 4, 2009 at 1:24 PM

Point taken. Obama has legitimized this debate. We may never have another opportunity for this to play out again and just be a battle of words.

genso on March 4, 2009 at 1:25 PM

Rove’s attack strategy in 2006:
jim m on March 4, 2009 at 1:21 PM

Looking at that article, it seems the attack was based on issues. The Democratic response?

Democrats were quick to respond, with Democratic National Committee Chairman Howard Dean challenging Rove’s fitness to serve. “Karl Rove only has a White House job and a security clearance because President Bush has refused to keep his promise to fire anyone involved in revealing the identity of an undercover CIA operative,” Dean said in a statement. Dean added: “The truth is, Karl Rove breached our national security for partisan gain and that is both unpatriotic and wrong.”

Typical.

ddrintn on March 4, 2009 at 1:26 PM

Remember obama really does want the fairness doctrine but probably can’t enforce it openly. It MAYBE a way to get arround that by destroying the radio personalities one by one. Or I could be just paranoid. We will see.

sonofdy on March 4, 2009 at 1:26 PM

It’s like the ‘cool’ kids have taken over the school and they have no clue how to run it. Obama saunters off the plane like he’s too cool for school, Gibbs answers in circles, not really saying anything, and they are jealous that Rush can keep an audience of 20 million listeners tuned in for three hours a day.
Obama and Gibbs have no class and no clue.

HornetSting on March 4, 2009 at 1:26 PM

and are grumbling about his profile being raised instead of celebrating it.

Allahpundit on March 4, 2009 at 1:16 PM

Nice strawman there.

I have yet to see anyone outside the WH object specifically to Rush’s profile being raised.

What I see Rush’s backers objecting to is a conspiracy, headquartered in the WH, to attack Rush.

The fact that the conspiracy seems to be backfiring is just gravy, but it is still underhanded on their part.

MarkTheGreat on March 4, 2009 at 1:26 PM

Skywise on March 4, 2009 at 1:22 PM

This just proves how spineless the GOPers are. How many Republicans could be out right now mocking Obama ans his staff for attacking Rush instead of dealing with government issues that matter?

If every RINO left in washington took up a mic and started mocking these men, not even the Marxist news agencies could ignore it. Furthermore, they do it all without insulting any radio-personalities.

But, per usual, their hiding in their bunkers with champagne and caviar toast points, waiting for the next earmark to pork through.

TMK on March 4, 2009 at 1:27 PM

Well, you have to give the Democrats credit: They’ve taken a self-absorbed, drug-addled, loudmouth cow and made him the face of the GOP. That’s smart.

paul006 on March 4, 2009 at 1:25 PM

Um, you might want to check that Rasmussen poll up in the Headlines. The American people apparently are not going along with the strategy.

rockmom on March 4, 2009 at 1:27 PM

Which aspect of Rush’s privacy has been invaded?

Allahpundit on March 4, 2009 at 1:22 PM

I saw nothing. I heard nothing. I know nothing. I was not at the IRS building with Rahm Emanuel. I do not even no where the IRS building is at. I do not even know who Rahm Emanuel is. I have not even gotten up any morning since all this started.

OberfeldwebelSchultz on March 4, 2009 at 1:27 PM

It’s astounding the number of conservatives whose political ideology begins and ends with Rush Limbaugh, it’s like they have no other reference point for their beliefs.

DeathToMediaHacks on March 4, 2009 at 1:21 PM

What’s an astounding number to you? 11?

DarkCurrent on March 4, 2009 at 1:28 PM

I think someone’s mentioned that Pelosi and Reid need to be made the targets, not Obama. I think that’s what needs to be done.

ddrintn on March 4, 2009 at 1:22 PM

Nah, Pelosi and Reid don’t care what public opinion is- Barry treasures it above all else, that’s why he always has someone else do his dirty work.

anniekc on March 4, 2009 at 1:28 PM

I’m celebrating it and I’m a big, long-time Rush fan.
I have no doubt that he has several million more listeners this week than he did last.

Jenfidel on March 4, 2009 at 1:20 PM

Me too. I have no problem if this ridiculous “strategy” by the WH steers people to Rush. He is one of the few media people (radio and TV) articulating Conservative principles consistently.

We’re dealing with neophytes. They’re running against time. In their minds, the faster they cram their agenda down our throats, the better. They’ll be found out eventually, the question is can we adequately respond to and fix their damage to our country?

conservative pilgrim on March 4, 2009 at 1:28 PM

Judge Reseals Rush’s Medical Records
On Christmas Eve, a judge decides to let the radio star’s medical files stay closed for the next 15 days to allow his lawyers to prepare an appeal to keep ‘em closed.

TheBigOldDog on March 4, 2009 at 1:28 PM

We needed this to happen. Whether you agree that Rush is the head of our party, he is certainly the voice of it now. We need to get behind him and push this in Dear Leader’s face til he can’t back down. America needs this feud.

I agree, actually. The only problem with this fight is the stupid comments on the right such as Rush is ugly, etc. It’s best those people just get out of the way.

Spirit of 1776 on March 4, 2009 at 1:22 PM

What is sad is that no one in the GOP leadership is prepared to take on the Democrats. That’s why Limbaugh is front and center right now.

ddrintn on March 4, 2009 at 1:28 PM

celebrating it.

Allahpundit on March 4, 2009 at 1:16 PM

Cheers!

I celebrate it.

Just don’t believe for one second that the Left’s operative intention is anything other than using the machinations of government to destroy the opposition through the politics of destruction of a private citizen.

Stalin would be proud.

Saltysam on March 4, 2009 at 1:28 PM

Good Lord, do Obama and his thug media henchmen see themselves as modern day Goodfella’s, or what?

anniekc on March 4, 2009 at 1:21 PM

Remember where our President learned how politics work.

scalleywag on March 4, 2009 at 1:28 PM

And Rove and Bush never did the same thing?

jim m on March 4, 2009 at 1:14 PM

Being true in your imagination does not equal being true.

Someone had to tell you.

jeff_from_mpls on March 4, 2009 at 1:29 PM

Poor AP. You just can’t seem to get through to people today. At this rate you’ll have to change your name to SisyphusPundit. :P
TheUnrepentantGeek on March 4, 2009 at 1:23 PM

Heh, don’t feel bad, Rush is just as productive a thread topic as Palin, intelligent design and atheism have been lately.

AP is lovin’ every minute and every post of this.

Bishop on March 4, 2009 at 1:29 PM

Ok, they started on Rush in 93? And that worked so well for them.

So they’re coming back to the well. Kind of like all those pols who hired Shrum. It’ll work this time, we just know it!

meep on March 4, 2009 at 1:29 PM

H

ahahahaha! I missed that. Did he actually say “price and earnings ratio”? What a poseur. Such hubris. Unbelievable.

Mr. Obama, hot tip for you: Less time playing basketball and a little time on Economics/Finance 101.

Mr. Steel, how about some TV ads spotlighting Obama’s “price and earnings ratio”?

petefrt on March 4, 2009 at 1:20 PM

Does the President Know What ‘P/E Ratio’ Stands For?

Obama, today: “On the other hand, what you’re now seeing is profit and earning ratios are starting to get to the point where buying stocks is a potentially good deal if you’ve got a long-term perspective on it.”

Did he mean price-to-earnings ratio? The traditional definition of P/E ratio?

If Bush had said the above, it would be ipso facto evidence of his idiocy.

INC on March 4, 2009 at 1:29 PM

I am betting this will backfire.
Anyone who actually listens with an open mind to Rush understands what he’s all about.
His arrogance is funny & his satire is so subtle sometimes that morons misunderstand it, go on the attack, & reveal themselves as the tools they really are to those of us with half a brain that recognize it.
What a gaff all of this is.
Obama is the real tool here.
I pray the American people (who aren’t welfare panderers & tax cheats) can see what this admin is trying to do-ATTACK A PRIVATE citizen, as NoDonkey said above, who has broken NO laws.
This is truly madness on their part.

Badger40 on March 4, 2009 at 1:29 PM

What is sad is that no one in the GOP leadership is prepared to take on the Democrats. That’s why Limbaugh is front and center right now.

ddrintn on March 4, 2009 at 1:28 PM

That is the saddest thing. This is the perfect opening for all voices to start speaking out.

genso on March 4, 2009 at 1:30 PM

You know, something’s bothered me for a while now. Why in the world would CNN broadcast all of Rush’s CPAC speech??

BigWyo on March 4, 2009 at 1:25 PM

You’re a smart guy!

JiangxiDad on March 4, 2009 at 1:30 PM

Which aspect of Rush’s privacy has been invaded?

Allahpundit on March 4, 2009 at 1:22 PM

How about the annual tax audits Rush has received in NY for the past # years? (He said the number last week, but I can’t remember.) That isn’t an invasion of privacy, but it sure looks like he’s being singled out.

conservative pilgrim on March 4, 2009 at 1:30 PM

I think someone’s mentioned that Pelosi and Reid need to be made the targets, not Obama. I think that’s what needs to be done.

ddrintn on March 4, 2009 at 1:22 PM

Nah, Pelosi and Reid don’t care what public opinion is- Barry treasures it above all else, that’s why he always has someone else do his dirty work.

anniekc on March 4, 2009 at 1:28 PM

Rostenkowski, Wright, and Tom Foley didn’t care, either.

ddrintn on March 4, 2009 at 1:31 PM

Carville’s strategy will work, only if Obama is a good President.

Since that has no chance at all happening, who will the American people look to as Obama continues to crap the bed?

No one on the left and no one who sold us this two-bit Malcolm X knock off, that’s for sure.

NoDonkey on March 4, 2009 at 1:31 PM

Rove’s attack strategy in 2006: http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/01/20/AR2006012001853.html.

jim m on March 4, 2009 at 1:21 PM

LOL! Not even close. Thanks for trying, though. You can do better.

Del Dolemonte on March 4, 2009 at 1:31 PM

Remember when it was conservatives who were accusing progressives and Dems of thinking Americans were too stupid to see issues from our side and called us elitists.
DeathToMediaHacks on March 4, 2009 at 1:24 PM

If that’s true, why does Obama need to orchestrate attacks on Rush to distract from his policies?

Why does Obama have to rush through legislation without proper debate so that NO CONGRESSMAN was able to read the bill?

Checkmate.

Skywise on March 4, 2009 at 1:31 PM

Sheesh, prog, the list of Osama Obamaisms is so long now it dwarfs the supply of Bushisms! Put ‘em in 5-point type and they’d fill the NYT.

That’s only malapropisms and instances of total stupidity/ignorance and doesn’t count his plain, everyday lies, of course.

It is quite amazing. The level of stupidity is only rivaled by his nastiness and outright lies. And there are still people who think he’s smart … it is quite astounding and says more about those idiots than they realize.

It’s time for the child-president to go.

It’s him or the US.

That said, Rash Fatblob must be feelin’ that old-time tingle running down his leg. You couldn’t buy the kind of attention he’s getting from the Messiah and his stupid Dem lapdogs; it would cost more than “EIB One.”

No doubt. And I’m glad that Rush has been pushed forward, too. He espouses a very reasonable conservativism and does a much better job explaining conservative principles than the GOP has done in years. I’ll also go with Mark Steyn, Laura Ingraham, Ann Coulter, …

I can’t stand the guy, though when he voices serious policy opinions — as opposed to the near-constant self-back-patting — he’s pretty much right on.

MrScribbler on March 4, 2009 at 1:25 PM

I like Rush, though I’m not a listener. And I would just say that the self-back-patting seems to be a part of radio culture more than anything personal. Everyone in radio does it (if they have good ratings). I don’t know why this is, but it’s been this way for decades.

And I (obviously) agree with you on Rush’s take on conservativism.

progressoverpeace on March 4, 2009 at 1:32 PM

Good Lord, do Obama and his thug media henchmen see themselves as modern day Goodfella’s, or what?

anniekc on March 4, 2009 at 1:21 PM

The ACORN ain’t falling far from the tree.

MarkTheGreat on March 4, 2009 at 1:32 PM

Well, you have to give the Democrats credit: They’ve taken a self-absorbed, drug-addled, loudmouth cow and made him the face of the GOP. That’s smart.
paul006 on March 4, 2009 at 1:25 PM

I checked various sources and can’t find any information about President Ogabe being the nfew face of the GOP.

Toke it up, Barry, toke it.

Bishop on March 4, 2009 at 1:32 PM

When will Fibbs give his next rebuttal of Rush’s Address to America?

Christien on March 4, 2009 at 1:33 PM

You know, something’s bothered me for a while now. Why in the world would CNN broadcast all of Rush’s CPAC speech??

BigWyo on March 4, 2009 at 1:25 PM

To entice more than the average six viewers they get;

Actually it was because even CNN knows that Rush is gold and there was sure to be a “story” following the speech.

anniekc on March 4, 2009 at 1:34 PM

First they go after poor, little Trig and now they attack a deaf guy… I’m starting to think the Democrats hate people with disabilities.

myrenovations on March 4, 2009 at 1:34 PM

Just going to move my comments from the headline thread here.

But first, spot-on, Ed Morrissey. Spot-on analysis. This is an attack, NOT a “promotion”. When the Left smears Michelle Malkin and misrepresents her views and then “promotes” her as the leader of the Conservative movement with the purpose of discrediting Michelle AND all Conservatives, only the naive would call that a “promotion” that helps her.

*****

When the White House, the mass media, the Democrats and the Left are taking everything you say completely out of context, smearing your message, misrepresenting everything you say and then propping up THAT as representative of you and your message, I don’t see how AllahPundit considers that a help to Rush Limbaugh.

What Rush Limbaugh does is what AllahPundit describes. He shines a light on the Democrats and the Left’s message, he plays their speeches in full context, he reads their idiotic op-eds in full context and then goes on to explain what they mean, using their own words in full context. That is NOT what the Left, mass media, White House and Democrat Party is doing with Rush.

The Left smears their opponents and then presents that message as representative of their opponent.

I’d like to know how AllahPundit would feel if this were the Left, President and Democrats going after Michelle Malkin in the same way. Would he say that smearing Michelle Malkin and misrepresenting her views was propping her up and making her more popular and would be a good thing for her website and reputation? What if the Left-President-Democrats decided to say that everyone on the right was represented by the homophobic, racist, anti-immigrant, anti-Hispanic, Bible-thumping, bigoted Michelle Malkin? Would AllahPundit just turn around and say that Michelle Malkin was not a private citizen and the Left-President-Democrat Party had every right to attack her like that? And then he would blow it off as he is doing with the attack on Rush?

By the way, csdeven, thanks for your comments in this thread. You have expressed much of what I have been thinking about this issue and throughout reading 3/4ths of these comments so far.

Michael in MI on March 4, 2009 at 12:58 PM

Their motivation is nothing more or less than exploiting the fact that MICHELLE MALKIN is unpopular (or so they believe) with most of the country. If that’s true, it’s MICHELLE MALKIN’s fault, not theirs. They’re not insulting HER, they’re simply promoting HER to leverage that unpopularity against the GOP. If it’s untrue, then they’ve shot themselves in the foot by raising the profile of a WOMAN who might turn the country against them.

Here’s the bottom line: The only sure winner in all of this is MICHELLE MALKIN HERSELF, because this is bound to increase HER influence. That’s why it’s bizarre that so many of you are taking offense. If you truly believe that MICHELLE MALKIN is conservatism’s best messenger, then you should be euphoric over the free publicity SHE’s getting out of this. In fact, Peter Daou (a lefty) over at the Huffington Post is wringing his hands for precisely that reason.

Allahpundit on March 4, 2009 at 11:13 AM

Now, consider that statement and consider the way that the Left “promotes” Michelle Malkin and her conservative message. They don’t “promote” her in an intellectually honest way, explaining her beliefs and values and principles in context. They smear her, and then promote THAT as what Michelle Malkin represents. They work to marginalize her and ALL conservatives by putting up a compeletely bastardized version of Michelle’s views — an thus the views of conservatives — and then use that to turn people off to not only Michelle, but to all conservatism in general.

THAT is the effort that is going on now, AllahPundit. And the fact that you and many others cannot see that is very disheartening, to say the least.

Michael in MI on March 4, 2009 at 1:04 PM

Michael in MI on March 4, 2009 at 1:34 PM

“On the other hand, what you’re now seeing is profit and earning ratios are starting to get to the point where buying stocks is a potentially good deal”

They don’t teach economics in Community Organizing school?

I like the “potentially” part, particularly well.

As in, Obama could “potentially” get his head out of his ass, but “potentially”, he may not and you may “potentially” lose every dime you ever had or ever hoped to have.

NoDonkey on March 4, 2009 at 1:34 PM

The DEMs are fools

Rush is being Reaganized.

That is the manner by which Ronald Reagan was popularized by the angry press for free. As the press raged and quoted Reagan’s idiocies in ever increasing details, the message of Reagan’s ‘idiocies’ was passed on to the public and converted enough of them to win Reagan the election

Currently Rush has low approvals among those who listen to him the least. He has the lowest approvals among those who take at face values the reports about his evil. They will be exposed to what he says edited or not, and some of it will take

Deja vu

That is how I converted from liberalism many years ago

entagor on March 4, 2009 at 1:34 PM

Does the President Know What ‘P/E Ratio’ Stands For?

Obama, today: “On the other hand, what you’re now seeing is profit and earning ratios are starting to get to the point where buying stocks is a potentially good deal if you’ve got a long-term perspective on it.”

Did he mean price-to-earnings ratio? The traditional definition of P/E ratio?

If Bush had said the above, it would be ipso facto evidence of his idiocy.

INC on March 4, 2009 at 1:29 PM

But…but…he was editor of the Harvard Law Review!!!! (Right, benny?)

ddrintn on March 4, 2009 at 1:34 PM

Toke it up, Barry, toke it.

Bishop on March 4, 2009 at 1:32 PM

No smoking in the WH. That will have to be “snort.”

JiangxiDad on March 4, 2009 at 1:34 PM

It’s more like promotion, albeit promotion for their own ends. -AP

I think this article makes the case quite clear that this is an attack policy devised by experienced hands from the Clinton administration at attack politics. -Ed

It’s both.

FloatingRock on March 4, 2009 at 1:34 PM

Bishop on March 4, 2009 at 1:32 PM

These guys are here to try to drive a wedge between us all. What they don’t realize, and what Obama doesn’t realize by going after Rush, Santelli et al, is that they are steeling us and giving us someone to rally behind.

genso on March 4, 2009 at 1:35 PM

Comment pages: 1 2 3 4 5 9