Hope and Change: The Operation Rushbo Distraction
posted at 12:30 pm on March 4, 2009 by Ed Morrissey
If the first six weeks of the Barack Obama administration can be summed up in one sentence, it would be this: Obama fiddled with Rush Limbaugh while Wall Street burned. Politico reports that the demonization of Rush Limbaugh comes as a deliberate strategy by Obama and the Democrats, who hoodwinked people into believing that a Chicago Machine pol really wanted to change the partisan nature of politics. Starting in October, Obama relied on an old hand in attack politics to devise this strategy — and rolled it out even in the middle of an economic meltdown:
Top Democrats believe they have struck political gold by depicting Rush Limbaugh as the new face of the Republican Party, a full-scale effort first hatched by some of the most familiar names in politics and now being guided in part from inside the White House.
The strategy took shape after Democratic strategists Stanley Greenberg and James Carville included Limbaugh’s name in an October poll and learned their longtime tormentor was deeply unpopular with many Americans, especially younger voters. Then the conservative talk-radio host emerged as an unapologetic critic of Barack Obama shortly before his inauguration, when even many Republicans were showering him with praise.
Soon it clicked: Democrats realized they could roll out a new GOP bogeyman for the post-Bush era by turning to an old one in Limbaugh, a polarizing figure since he rose to prominence in the 1990s.
Read all of Jonathan Martin’s report, which makes clear that Carville and Paul Begala coordinated this effort with Obama chief of staff Rahm Emanuel on their morning conference calls. Clearly, Obama wants to use his media contacts to play rough with critics through coordinated personal-attack campaigns. Martin neglects to mention, though, that Obama himself started off this attack by telling Republicans that they can’t listen to Limbaugh any longer if they want to have access to Democratic-controlled agendas on the Hill.
So far, Obama’s attack machine — and there’s no other term for it — has mostly succeeded. While the markets have lost 18% of their value in the six weeks of his leadership, all Democrats can talk about is Rush. Newspapers and media have followed suit, and so have the blogs. Usually excellent sites like The Moderate Voice and Political Machine have turned themselves into almost nothing but anti-Limbaugh sites, where Jazz Shaw’s light satire of the trend gets completely subsumed in the overwhelming focus on someone who has no direct power on policy or enforcement. Instead of focusing attention on the real policy leaders in Washington — all Democrats — whose every move has received a resounding vote of no confidence from investors, they have allowed themselves to get distracted by a deliberate strategy of misdirection originating in the highest levels of the White House.
It’s reminiscent of Nixon’s enemies list, and it comes from the supposed messiah of Hope and Change.
Rush Limbaugh provides commentary, criticism, analysis, and entertainment, not political leadership, as Rush himself would attest. He has an audience of 20 million people, which makes attacks on him by people like Michael Steele and other Republicans rather stupid. Instead of dividing the Right, they would do better to act as Bobby Jindal did and find ways to unite the Right. But with Republicans out of power, this is mere sideshow. It’s a circus provided by Democrats to cover up their economic incompetence and massively ineffective spending programs. It’s also a harbinger of things to come as this administration fumbles one issue after another, as they will only need to expand the personal attacks against critics rather than respond to the criticism itself.
Operation Rushbo only succeeds if people swallow it.
Update (AP): Boehner called it a “distraction” today too but I think that misses the point. Economic ruin will be with us long after this dust-up with Rush has blown away, which is to say, in the long run this won’t distract anyone from anything. What the Democrats are really trying to do is rebrand the GOP. They’re keenly attuned to that sort of thing, as we were reminded again just yesterday. I also wouldn’t call what they’re doing to Rush an “attack.” It’s more like promotion, albeit promotion for their own ends. In fact, if there’s anyone who benefits unambiguously from all this, it’s Rush himself. The Democrats might miscalculate in overestimating his supposed unpopularity, and the GOP leadership will go on squirming at having to defend or reject the idea of wanting Obama to fail, but all Limbaugh has to worry about is an expanding audience. His show has never seemed so vital as it does right now, which is precisely why lefties like Peter Daou are starting to worry.
Update (Ed): We’re going to agree to disagree. I think this article makes the case quite clear that this is an attack policy devised by experienced hands from the Clinton administration at attack politics. Whether that “rebrands” the GOP is probably secondary; as Carville himself once famously noted, “Your opponent can’t hit back when you have your fist in his face.” So much for changing the tone in Washington.










Blowback
Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.
Trackbacks/Pings
Trackback URL
Comments
Comment pages: « Previous 1 2 3 4 … 9 Next »
I’m not worried about Rush’s show, and neither is Rush. This kerfluffle does help his ratings. But for years we heard the Left say “dissent is patriotic”, now we are practically hearing that “dissent is treasonous”.
And when Dear Leader says that Republicans have to stop listening to Rush in order to be invited to the big table, yes I do call that an attack.
rbj on March 4, 2009 at 12:59 PM
Othuga is just another corrupt Chi-town scummy politician.
He and his corrupt uber-liberal cronies are ruining this coutry and shredding the constituion.
Impeach Obama!
VolMagic on March 4, 2009 at 12:59 PM
I listen to Frum on Hugh Hewitt yesterday. It was pathetic. Unlike Rush, Frum is incapable of making “a point”.
Norwegian on March 4, 2009 at 12:59 PM
The fact that it’s so obvious as a strategy makes it all the more incredible that it’s working so unbelievably well. :-p
Jazz Shaw on March 4, 2009 at 12:59 PM
Rush just said Snerdley is being bombarded with Obama voter callers.
OmahaConservative on March 4, 2009 at 12:59 PM
Now that I see it, that could be taken either way…the ‘geniuses’ at HA or the ‘geniuses’ in the WH. If you meant the former, I apologize profusely.
HornetSting on March 4, 2009 at 12:59 PM
How have they “gone after” him? Your argument would really benefit from defining some concrete harm that Rush has been forced to suffer here. All I can see is that he’s gotten a lot of free publicity.
If Gibbs wants to get up at today’s presser and declare Hot Air the most influential conservative blog in the country, I assure you, no tears will be shed.
Allahpundit on March 4, 2009 at 12:59 PM
Disagree with the premise.
A private citizen is responding to an ongoing targeting by the executive branch of the federal government.
You think Gibbs will “respond” before they get all their shill ducks in a row throughout the media, the bureaucracy, the internet operatives, and the DNC?
You’ve got to be kidding me.
Saltysam on March 4, 2009 at 1:00 PM
Good on you, Ed.
Spirit of 1776 on March 4, 2009 at 1:00 PM
Barry: I want Rush to succeed!
Christien on March 4, 2009 at 1:00 PM
Stupid.
jimmy2shoes on March 4, 2009 at 1:00 PM
Don’t think it is long term strategy.
getalife on March 4, 2009 at 12:57 PM
You’re right. His long-term strategy is the Socialization of America through the use of Alinsky’s Rules for Radicals.
Eventually, he wants America to look like a Socialist Democratic European Country.
kingsjester on March 4, 2009 at 1:00 PM
I’m surprised they are awake.
HornetSting on March 4, 2009 at 1:00 PM
Yep…the troops have been mobilized. Its obvious here as well.
genso on March 4, 2009 at 1:00 PM
Well, there is a third way: coming up with a coherent voice of opposition. If it accords with Limbaugh, fine. If it doesn’t, so be it. The GOP is on the horns of that dilemma thanks to its own spinelessness and slavish devotion to opinion polls.
ddrintn on March 4, 2009 at 1:00 PM
GREAT post, Ed!!!!
But I think some more facts need to be brought to this discussion. Jonah Goldberg made a great contribution with his column yesterday. He noted that Emanuel, Carville, and Begala were around when Bill Clinton tried to blame “hate radio” for the Oklahoma City bombing.
Goldberg also recalled Tom Daschle’s attack on Limbaugh in 2002. Many people do not know that Daschle was the original candidate of the progressives for 2008. He already had a campaign operation set up and ready to go after the 2004 election. But he lost his Senate seat and the plan went up in smoke. He anointed Barack Obama to carry the torch for him and gave him his entire campaign operation and staff. Those people are all in the White House now.
This campaign is about Rahm Emanuel’s 15-year obsession with Rush Limbaugh. It is about payback for the 1994 election. It is about Tom Daschle’s defeat in 2004. It’s a petty and stupid and hamhanded attempt at revenge.
rockmom on March 4, 2009 at 1:01 PM
James Carville and Paul Begala are sideshow freaks..look at them.
RobCon on March 4, 2009 at 1:01 PM
What backlash? By now, a majority of Americans want him to fail. Quarterly reports on 401(K)s come out in three weeks – by then it will be overwhelming.
Vashta.Nerada on March 4, 2009 at 1:01 PM
For the same reason it was tough to translate, “I support funding for troops, proper equipment and veterans benefits, but I’m philosophically opposed to war” into a political slogan that had resonance. Especially in response to charges that those who opposed the war “hate/don’t support the troops.”
Before the thread gets diverted, I don’t want to re-fight the march to war debate, I’m merely making a point about the difficulty of nuance and qualification in our current media that emphasizes soundbites, conflict and the easy headline. Whoever said Jindal is the model on how to respond for GOP politicians is correct. But, in case you haven’t noticed, most GOP politicians are DUMB and, it seems, can’t really respond on their feet. Michael Steele, as a warned, is one of the people least able to do that kind of important discursive tango in a way that doesn’t seem politician-weasel. A party that used to be incredibly good about messaging has lost its way.
DeathToMediaHacks on March 4, 2009 at 1:01 PM
Exactly. Rush is taking the WH attack nuclear to put Obama’s plans under maximum scrutiny, and Steele needs to get on board by focusing on the issues. Either that, or get out of the way.
petefrt on March 4, 2009 at 1:02 PM
Yep, according to Nielsen he just reached an all-time high in listenship.
Meanwhile, the GOP is gaining big on Democrats in the Generic Ballot according to Rasmussen.
The losers? Frum and his ilk, who is more marginalized than ever. And eventually, Obama.
Norwegian on March 4, 2009 at 1:02 PM
LOL…Dear Leader is under assualt.
ddrintn on March 4, 2009 at 1:02 PM
Got ours yesterday, lost all of last year’s contributions, plus more…..it’s gonna get ugly.
HornetSting on March 4, 2009 at 1:02 PM
Come on Allah, you’re better than that.
Rush has already been targeted, as this post already demonstrates.
The battle has been engaged, now the fight begins. Targeting is over, war is on!
Jason Coleman on March 4, 2009 at 1:03 PM
er, assault.
ddrintn on March 4, 2009 at 1:03 PM
As I said in a previous thread, Gibbs was purposely misrepresenting the “I want him to fail comment” as “I want America to fail”– meaning, high unemployment, inflation, crappy economy, wars, etc. Rush said a billion times he means he wants Obama to fail implementing his agenda. It is unseemly and a little creepy to have the White House spokesman smear you for political gain. They are not just “elevating” him– they are “elevating” him with a smear, Allah. Why is this so hard for you to admit?
Pasalubong on March 4, 2009 at 1:03 PM
Great article…
This somewhat reminds me of something I heard about the “attack machine” or personal politics/distractions, etc.
“First, you accuse your opponent of screwing chickens…then, you hope he or she comes back and denies it…”
Result: No focus on policies.
TightAggressive on March 4, 2009 at 1:03 PM
If I understand the strategy, it is this: 1/3 of the voters like Rush and they always will. 1/3 of the voters hate Rush and they always will. Polls show that the middle 1/3 don’t have a good opinion of Rush so the plan is to paint him as the head of the Party so that middle 1/3 will move left. Pretty good strategy and, if my belief is true, it’s the middle 1/3 that don’t pay that much attention anyway so if they “feel” that Rush is a bad guy, all the better for the left.
But…what if that middle 1/3 starts to listen to Rush due to the fact that he’s a target? What if they start to take a few minutes to actually pay attention? Might they then start to see that Rush has a perspective that is worth listening to? If so, then maybe those middle 1/3 will start to realize that we are indeed a center-right nation that’s now being led by an ultra-left administration.
There’s always hope
mctowler on March 4, 2009 at 1:03 PM
Rush,
Sweeten the debate deal by throwing in a primo set of steak knives for Rahmmie.
Christien on March 4, 2009 at 1:03 PM
Allah, you say that the GOP will look bad to every day Americans if Rush debates obama. Personally, I think the every day Americans will think bad upon obama that the POTUS is taking time out of his day to debate a so called right wing zealot. Obama has more important issues, to me this only going to bite Obama in the tush!
Jack Daniels on March 4, 2009 at 1:03 PM
I’m hearing legalese here. The attempt by the gov’t to use their official power to silence Rush (pls. don’t ask how they are attempting to do that) threatens me. He has substantial power. I have none.
And I didn’t ask about HOTAIR. I asked about ALLAHPUNDIT personally.
JiangxiDad on March 4, 2009 at 1:03 PM
I meant the ‘geniuses’ at the White House in a strictly ironic fashion. I seldom call anyone a genius for serious.
Does that continue to make sense, or have I still erred?
Frivolous on March 4, 2009 at 1:04 PM
Exactly. This feud is exactly what the GOP needs to get off their collective asses. This needs to get everyone off the bench and lets have it out. Rather to have a death match now than wait for the death by a thousand cuts. I’ll put my money on Rush.
genso on March 4, 2009 at 1:04 PM
Richard Nixon would be proud!
scalleywag on March 4, 2009 at 1:04 PM
Precisely so.
Indeed. I’m just grateful that the GOP has been elevated so much during the last campaign by Obama. The repeated playing of the race card in the media, etc, really elevated the GOP. I don’t know where to start to begin to express my gratitude.
Spirit of 1776 on March 4, 2009 at 1:05 PM
When all you have is a hammer,
everything starts to look like a nailyou go searching for nails when what you really need is a fire bucket.BohicaTwentyTwo on March 4, 2009 at 1:05 PM
If Rush really wants to be like Patton he needs to support the troops
MB4 on March 4, 2009 at 1:05 PM
The people to burn on this are not Carville, Bengala or Emmanuel. They are simply acting true to form. We knew they would pull this crap.
Our fight needs to be with the media, who are the functional arm of this crap. I want Stephanopolis and the rest heads’ on a plate.
Damiano on March 4, 2009 at 1:05 PM
DeathToMediaHacks on March 4, 2009 at 12:55 PM
technopeasant on March 4, 2009 at 1:05 PM
May these people burn in hell.
Alana on March 4, 2009 at 1:05 PM
Really? OK, humor me. Let’s say the primaries are between Rush and… oh, well, I don’t know, let’s take the devil himself Arlen Specter.
Give me your numbers.
Mine are… let’s say, Rush 30% – Specter 70%.
radiofreevillage on March 4, 2009 at 1:05 PM
I’m surprised that people aren’t nearly as concerned at the coordination between the White House and the press – direct, intentional, and organized. This is a conspiracy, though it is all out in the open. Nixon might have had an enemies list, but he didn’t wield the power of network shows and news – quite the opposite.
It was very clear that the Precedent started this. It is also clear that Republican politicians are scared of blaming the Precedent for his own idiotic moves – they blamed the Congressional dems for the Porkulus and let the idiot messiah slide.
GOP politicians ought to be out in front of the cameras hammering home the disgusting nature of the collusion between the White House and media (as if this is something new) and they need to be very clear that BHO is a moron who has not a clue as to what he is doing. They can start with something simple, like pointing out that the Precedent knows so little about the stock market that he spoke about “the price and earnings ratio” during his little answering session with Gordon Brown. This little quote demonstrates so much that it is insane not to hammer it home – it shows that the Precedent doesn’t know what the P/E ratio is, doesn’t know what a ratio is (no one but a total moron uses “and” in describing a ratio), and no concept about any part of economics, finance, or our monetary system. They need to drive home the fact that the Precedent is an idiot, which the Precedent makes so easy and obvious. Playing nice with the nastiest person to ever sit in the Oval Office (just listen to how the idiot messiah lashes out against everyone on the right, at every opportunity, with no problem lying his azz off and smearing people with a straight face) is not a good strategy.
progressoverpeace on March 4, 2009 at 1:06 PM
May these people burn in Hades.
Alana on March 4, 2009 at 1:06 PM
I wonder how different you’d feel if he blew your cover, named you buy name and made you the center of his ire?
TheBigOldDog on March 4, 2009 at 1:06 PM
Has AP answered this yet? Because I can’t seem to find the response and I believe variations of this have been posed to AP previously today. And while I think AP has a point (Rush is hardly a “private” citizen with a daily radio show of 20 million listeners), I think AP is missing the larger picture which is: where do you draw the line? If the White House can respond directly with criticism to Rick Santelli or Rush Limbaugh, why not Allahpundit? Why not me?
LastRick on March 4, 2009 at 1:06 PM
Or they could explain to those who prefer to remain oblivious, the perils of the false dichotomy.
MarkTheGreat on March 4, 2009 at 1:07 PM
You find it incredible that all the TV networks are just broadcasting Rahm’s talking points and doing his dirty work for him?
What’s incredible is that Rahm still can’t get over 1994.
rockmom on March 4, 2009 at 1:07 PM
ROFLMAO!!
Saltysam on March 4, 2009 at 1:07 PM
No ‘erring’, I mistook your irony. And, as above, I apologize profusely.
HornetSting on March 4, 2009 at 1:08 PM
And I see that simultaneously TheBigOldDog posts a better, simpler version of my thoughts. (shakes fist)
LastRick on March 4, 2009 at 1:08 PM
Progressoverpeace, please be a dear and call him by his proper title, President. Precedent means something different.
Or were you making a joke? I can so seldom get jokes over the Internet. :)
Frivolous on March 4, 2009 at 1:08 PM
and any signs of intelligence
MarkTheGreat on March 4, 2009 at 1:08 PM
Fortunately for the conservative movement and party, Rush is more than capable of playing with these idiots.
On two liberal seminar callers he nailed them on their premise.
They are choking on a debate with O’Bama. Gee, I guess debating the merits of all this stuff is hard for them.
Starlink on March 4, 2009 at 1:08 PM
Amen, genso. Amen!
petefrt on March 4, 2009 at 1:08 PM
You know you are heading down a dark dangerous road when your national leader is trying to destroy private citizens who disagree with him.
sonofdy on March 4, 2009 at 1:08 PM
Sigh. The White House doesn’t care about Rush. They care about the GOP. It’s the GOP that’s being targeted; Obama’s trying to stain Republicans with Rush’s (alleged) unpopularity.
Yes, I’m afraid I’m going to have to ask how they’re attempting to “silence” him by keeping his name in the headlines every day. If you mean the Fairness Doctrine, that’s a separate matter. Did you see the comment above, though, about Nielsen giving Rush his best ratings ever? So much for silencing him.
To clarify: If Gibbs gets up today and says Allahpundit is the most influential righty blogger in the country — and yes, I find that idea as comically absurd as all of you do — no tears will be shed, I assure you.
Allahpundit on March 4, 2009 at 1:08 PM
I said this in the headline thread but it bears repeating. Rush himself has ensured that his listener base can only expand so much. He has such a huge monopoly on radio syndication he’s able to reach nearly every possible right leaning American who:
1. Has the time to listen to talk radio
2. Has the personality to sit and listen to talk radio at all.
But because he’s refused to make his show into a free podcast and charges people for audio he has cut off a HUGE potential listener base, especially among young people. And yes I know a dozen posters will jump up and say “but I’m 20 and I listen to Rush.” There are tens of millions of people under 30 in this country and the vast majority of them do not listen to Rush or even like him. He’s so *not* what’s happening right now, in part, because he won’t go to a podcast.
And remember (again) any confrontation Obama has with Rush is going to leave Rush looking the worse, not Obama. Obama is the *master* at rarely publicly “attacking.” He may have mentioned Rush, but it was almost in a jokey way. It wasn’t something that if replayed over and over will make Obama look bad. Replaying Rush saying “I hope he fails” or “meet me at the OK corral or whatever” over and over makes HIM look bad, like the aggressor and (worse) like the opportunistic aggresor. All bad for your side.
DeathToMediaHacks on March 4, 2009 at 1:09 PM
That’s awesome – I’d put it on a T shirt if I could fit it all…
Vashta.Nerada on March 4, 2009 at 1:09 PM
As for the question of Rush’s “suffering” determining whether he is being attacked or not, aren’t the administration’s movtivations for doing so more important than the net effect?
Sometimes attacks fail. Even when an attack is successful, sometimes it leads to a pyrhhic (SP?) victory.
Just because Rush doesn’t lose a single listener, AP, doesn’t mean that he’s not being attacked if the attempt is to margnialize the GOP by associating it with a falsely-visualized boogeyman.
gryphon202 on March 4, 2009 at 1:09 PM
Chicago politics.
Do ANYTHING but the job you were elected to do.
Take bribes. Defeat/kill enemies. Write laws that benefit you directly and those who donate to you.
But don’t waste time being president of the United States.
Because being competent and having any idea what you’re doing, isn’t what got Obama-Mugabe to the White House.
Lying, cheating and stealing did.
NoDonkey on March 4, 2009 at 1:09 PM
Why should anyone care if things become harder for the Grand Old Elites? Can you offer any good reason why Americans should continue to prop-up a party that thinks socialism is okay in smaller doses? Or will it be the same old “lesser of two evils” chestnut?
TMK on March 4, 2009 at 1:09 PM
I am very aware of everything I write and how I write it. It is intentional and it is the most accurate title.
progressoverpeace on March 4, 2009 at 1:09 PM
I’m guessing that sarcasm wasn’t on the itinery at your school.
MarkTheGreat on March 4, 2009 at 1:09 PM
Leave it to Hacks to figure out the strategy, but he’s wrong.
Rush doesn’t mean to put GOP pols in a no-win position and they don’t have to be put there (Witness Steele’s mistakes.)
Because Rush is not an elected official, he can say he wants Zerobama to fail and why.
He is the perfect Beltway outsider for this.
No-one’s wrath is risked besides the White House and GOP politicians certainly don’t have to publicly agree with Rush that they want NObama to fail.
It’s a trap that Steele fell into, but no-one else should.
They should simply say “Rush is a great Conservative and a great American and he cares about our country as do I.” Period. Over.
It was only Steele’s pathetic efforts to make nice that got him into trouble and made him the story.
Otherwise, Rush’s speech would have been the story.
As for the intra-GOP sniping, we’ve all full up here.
Jenfidel on March 4, 2009 at 1:09 PM
And 50% of HotAir follows suit with Carville and Company. Nice.
Montana on March 4, 2009 at 1:10 PM
“If I have a book to have understanding in place of me, a spiritual advisor to have a conscience for me, a doctor to judge my diet for me, and so on, I need not make any efforts at all.” Immanuel Kant
Jamewah on March 4, 2009 at 1:10 PM
No problem. I admire a gentleman or lady who has manners. It’s always very nice to meet such a person.
Frivolous on March 4, 2009 at 1:10 PM
By now a majority of Americans aren’t caring about his politics, one way or another. By now most Americans see very little difference between the trillion signed away in September and the trillion signed away a few weeks ago.
MadisonConservative on March 4, 2009 at 1:10 PM
Lol! Rush just dismissed Slick Willie as a flunkie, and since “they” made Rush the leader, it is 0 or no one whom he will debate.
OmahaConservative on March 4, 2009 at 1:10 PM
That would be an invasion of privacy. How has he similarly invaded Rush’s privacy?
Allahpundit on March 4, 2009 at 1:10 PM
Bad Precedent, you mean? Hahahahaha. :)
Frivolous on March 4, 2009 at 1:11 PM
Lady-my head still hurts after receiving our 401K statement, making me a little edgy.
HornetSting on March 4, 2009 at 1:12 PM
Can you offer any alternative to the big two? Some were proposed some back during the election, and were laughed at for not jumping on the McCain bandwagon.
MadisonConservative on March 4, 2009 at 1:12 PM
Progressoverpeace, please be a dear and call him by his proper title, President. Precedent means something different.
Yes, “dear” PoP, call him by his proper title: Precedent Ogabe.
O-^-O *High five*
Bishop on March 4, 2009 at 1:12 PM
Rush just put it so well: “The Messiah just raised my profile.”
Rush always gets the last laugh. Awesome!
technopeasant on March 4, 2009 at 1:12 PM
What a freaking weak president we have. What a lame excuse for a presidential administration.
AubieJon on March 4, 2009 at 1:12 PM
Repeat of a question asked above: What “harm” has Rush suffered from all this? Presumably the victim of a White House “targeted attack” is suffering because of it. What’s the nature of his suffering?
Allahpundit on March 4, 2009 at 1:13 PM
rush wins listeners and the gop lose elections.
Who needs a fairness doctrine?
The gop.
getalife on March 4, 2009 at 1:13 PM
To clarify: If Gibbs gets up today and says Allahpundit is the most influential righty blogger in the country — and yes, I find that idea as comically absurd as all of you do — no tears will be shed, I assure you.
Allahpundit on March 4, 2009 at 1:08 PM
TheBigOldDog on March 4, 2009 at 1:13 PM
EXACTLY. EXACTLY. EXACTLY.
Allahpundit on March 4, 2009 at 1:13 PM
This isn’t some genius strategy to make Rush Limbaugh the face of the Republican Party. That’s the tactic. The strategy is simply to keep attacking Rush Limbaugh. He’s the flame and Rahm and Co. are the moths. They can’t resist going after him. They can’t make George Bush or Tom DeLay the bad guy anymore. So it’s Rush’s turn in their barrel.
As Ed lays out, this strategy was hatched waaaay before Rush Limbaugh said he hopes Obama fails. They would have jumped on something else he said.
rockmom on March 4, 2009 at 1:13 PM
Which is why calling out Limbaugh is utter idiocy on the part of Democrats. They’ve been down this road before, and it led to GOP majorities in both houses of Congress.
ddrintn on March 4, 2009 at 1:14 PM
You’re right on this AP. The real point is what is happening on the radio right now.
genso on March 4, 2009 at 1:14 PM
MadisonConservative on March 4, 2009 at 1:14 PM
Perhpas you’ve missed what happens to people who have their “profile raised” by the Left. Shall I remind you?
TheBigOldDog on March 4, 2009 at 1:14 PM
Rush is calling them out on it quite forcefully right now.
Libs are going ballistic and calling in.
I bet heads are exploding at Media Smatters for America as they monitor the broadcast through their little pink headphones.
jeff_from_mpls on March 4, 2009 at 1:14 PM
And Rove and Bush never did the same thing? Sorry, Ed, but your sense of outrage seems misguided.
jim m on March 4, 2009 at 1:14 PM
What about when they start to smear you by name?
I agree that this will benefit Rush, but that is because Rush is smarter then they are. Look at the Harry Reid letter – Reid did that with ill intent, and a moderate bought the letter. Rush is the fire they play with, but that doesn’t excuse the intent or the slander.
Spirit of 1776 on March 4, 2009 at 1:15 PM
You’re still ignoring the fact Gibbs has smeared Rush by purposely mispresenting his “I want him to fail” comment. If he tells the American public and has media flackies reinforcing the idea 24/7 that you wrote something incindiary that you didn’t, you might feel differently.
Pasalubong on March 4, 2009 at 1:15 PM
You are wrong Allah. I linked to the story about Obama warning the republicans not to listen to Rush. Does that sound like someone who doesn’t care about Rush?
carbon_footprint on March 4, 2009 at 1:15 PM
I have to disagree with you AP. Why else would Dear Leader specifically mention Rush Limbaugh as someone the GOP has to stop listening to if they want “bipartisanship.” He didn’t stick up for the House GOP when they complained about Pelosi keeping them out of the legislative process. The House GOP is irrelevant, and He only needs a couple of Republican senators to do whatever he wants. Right now the Republican party is virtually irrelevant in toto. So why target Rush, and by extension, Rush’s audience?
Do you recall either Bush, or Reagan ever doing something like this to a liberal media figure? I don’t.
rbj on March 4, 2009 at 1:15 PM
You are either being disingenuous or are not seeing the issue of Big Daddy Oh having a power over Rush he lacks thus far unless you count his text message brigades over you.
The sword of Damocles is the Fairness Doctrine AP…
you’d welcome the attention even negative because your lot in life would improve Limbaugh is being targeted for elimination.
sven10077 on March 4, 2009 at 1:15 PM
I’m very sorry then, HornetSting. I cannot blame you for being irritable. It can suck to watch a person’s life savings or other safety net fall away. Please accept my sympathies.
On the other hand, everyone is living longer these days anyway, so you will probably have years and years of continued life and health to make up for the losses, so long as you don’t get a heart attack from rage at the Obama administration.
Frivolous on March 4, 2009 at 1:15 PM
Yeah… ratings gold.
I think I’ve listened to Rush maybe two times (and only for a few minutes), but I am tempted more and more to listen to him because he is the news.
Abby Adams on March 4, 2009 at 1:15 PM
Um why NOT you? “Responding directly with criticism” is now tantamount to what? A public beating? What are the consequences?
DeathToMediaHacks on March 4, 2009 at 1:15 PM
Could be. I’m sure Rush thinks so. I’m just surprised more Rush fans don’t seem to agree, and are grumbling about his profile being raised instead of celebrating it.
Allahpundit on March 4, 2009 at 1:16 PM
LOL. Truly. Your argument rests on Obama &co. knowing when to stop. I think we’ll just have to disagree as well.
JiangxiDad on March 4, 2009 at 1:16 PM
How so?
ddrintn on March 4, 2009 at 1:16 PM
Comment pages: « Previous 1 2 3 4 … 9 Next »