Video: Jindal acts like a party leader

posted at 8:03 am on March 3, 2009 by Ed Morrissey

Bobby Jindal faced off against an unusually hostile Larry King last night over the Steele-Limbaugh contretemps. King kept trying to stuff words into Jindal’s mouth, and Jindal politely but firmly kept spitting them back at King.  King insists that Republicans want the country to fail when it’s clear that not even Rush says that:

Here’s a relevant part of the transcript, which I edited for coherence:

KING: Governor, do you think people are thinking about capitalism now or are they thinking about problems?

JINDAL: Look, clearly, the American people are worried about paying their mortgages, keeping their jobs and paying their health care bills. I think Rush is a great leader for conservatives. I think he articulates what a lot of people are concerned about. And I think it is absolutely true that you can help people keep their jobs, help people afford their health care, help people afford their homes without abandoning the same conservative principles.  For example, Republicans offered ideas like aggressive tax credits to make homes more affordable so people can refinance, can stay in their homes. You’d see more demand for homes. They’ve offered ideas about — instead of nationalizing banks, why not modify the mark … to market rules? …

KING: Do you want him to fail?

JINDAL: I want the — I don’t want those policies to be adopted. I want my country to succeed, but I don’t want policies to be adopted that I think –

KING: But what if the… policies actually work?  What if they work?

JINDAL: This is where we have a fundamental disagreement. I don’t think it’s going work to borrow half a — to spend in excess of our revenues.  If you believed everything that the president — if you believed all of his projections, if you believe the economy starts growing again, you believe that we’re not going be spending all that money fighting overseas…if you believe that all of these temporary programs are truly temporary, he’s still projecting deficits of half a trillion dollars per year, under the best case scenario.  Larry, that’s just not sustainable. We cannot continue to do this as a country. China cannot become — continue to be our largest foreign holders of debt. This addiction to debt is what’s caused so many of our problems. The government is not going to be the answer to every problem.  I want my country to succeed. But what I worry about is that simply spending money on new programs — look at every new bailout. You know, you talked today, you know, about the auto bailouts. Then you had the fourth, I think it’s the fourth — it’s hard to keep track — the AIG bailout today. It seems like every time you turn around, there’s another trillion dollar trillion plan. … I’ve yet to hear a coherent exit plan.

KING: So you hope — you hope it doesn’t hurt?

JINDAL: No. I hope that failed policies don’t get adopted. I want my country to succeed. I want the economy to grow. I want — certainly I want the economy to grow again so people can afford their homes.  But I don’t want the Congress to adopt policies that would make the problem worse, not better. … I think it’s our — I think it’s our obligation as Americans when we don’t agree with a policy to speak up against it and to certainly offer different solutions.

First, no one is saying that they hope the country fails.  King equates country with Barack Obama in a weird way that suggests King has bought into the cult of personality, as though Obama has become King’s personal messiah.  We don’t want Obama’s policies to get adopted because we think they’re going to be disastrous, and so far, Wall Street agrees, since it’s lost 18% since Obama took office and shows no sign of recovery.  People have lost their retirement incomes and stored wealth in this crash, and Obama wants to take even more of it for his so-called stimulus plans.

Jindal explains this very clearly and concisely, and also manages not to throw anyone on the Right under a bus while doing so.  He negotiates the Rush-Steele mixup by supporting both men, attempting to keep together the larger Republican coalition rather than kissing up to the media by trashing allies.  That’s how a party leader should act on national television.

Also, did you notice that King’s microphone went hot a little too soon?  It sounds as though he’s muttering “Christ” when the show comes out of commercial break.

Blowback

Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.

Trackbacks/Pings

Trackback URL

Comments

Comment pages: 1 2 3

Bobby, good, act like a party leader. That means acting authentic and like yourself. I like that competent pragmatic side of Jindal, not the pandering Jindal.

Mr. Joe on March 3, 2009 at 8:06 AM

Did Larry say “Jesus Christ” before the video started?

RadioFreeUSA on March 3, 2009 at 8:07 AM

Jindal explains this very clearly and concisely, and also manages not to throw anyone on the Right under a bus while doing so. He negotiates the Rush-Steele mixup by supporting both men, attempting to keep together the larger Republican coalition rather than kissing up to the media by trashing allies. That’s how a party leader should act on national television.

Totally agree. Michael Steele pay attention. Your job is to drive wedges into the Democrats and to bolster the GOP. You seem to have forgotten that.

Also, did you notice that King’s microphone went hot a little too soon? It sounds as though he’s muttering “Christ” when the show comes out of commercial break.

Maybe Bobby fired up the “spirit” in Larry!

Mr. Joe on March 3, 2009 at 8:10 AM

I heard King saying “Christ”, too. Sounds like he was being ornery, as usual.

PBoilermaker on March 3, 2009 at 8:11 AM

Larry King is irrelevant. He is only still on TV because its CNN, another irrelevant ‘news” channel.

jbh45 on March 3, 2009 at 8:11 AM

Great job by Jindal. He didn’t take the bait.

brogers on March 3, 2009 at 8:11 AM

Bobby Jindal has lost more braincells to aging than any Democrat has ever had. They talk about Obama being smart and we all know that it just aint so. Well I watched Bobby over and over again give press conferences during Gustav that were absolutely mindblowing. Here is a man talking so fast without a teleprompter telling people in different parishes where to pick up food, water, gasoline, and supplies…it was if the information was looking for anyway out of his head. He will smoke Obama in a debate.

PierreLegrand on March 3, 2009 at 8:11 AM

Nice job, Gov. Jindal.

Larry King’s body has outlived his brain.

petefrt on March 3, 2009 at 8:12 AM

More people in the GOP should take a lesson from Jindal. The guy is good.

RadioFreeUSA on March 3, 2009 at 8:13 AM

Jindal was very impressive. Much more so than King with his agitated demeanor where he appears to take any criticism of OBAMA personally, can’t make the distinction between Obama and America (as Ed points out), and can’t stop himself from interrupting his guest in mid-answer. Why do these talk show hosts have guests if all they want to do is talk at them????

ProfessorMiao on March 3, 2009 at 8:14 AM

I’ve yet to hear a coherent exit plan.

It’s good to turn their own language against them.

Disturb the Universe on March 3, 2009 at 8:14 AM

King equates country with Barack Obama in a weird way that suggests King has bought into the cult of personality, as though Obama has become King’s personal messiah.

Maybe King just doesn’t buy into the highly nuanced position of “I want the Patriots to win but Belichick to lose”

e-pirate on March 3, 2009 at 8:14 AM

Also, did you notice that King’s microphone went hot a little too soon? It sounds as though he’s muttering “Christ” when the show comes out of commercial break.

The views of King and his ilk are a given. There is no news there. But thank you for the Jindal news.

JiangxiDad on March 3, 2009 at 8:15 AM

I heard Larry is so old that all of his insides have been replaced with machine organs

blatantblue on March 3, 2009 at 8:15 AM

KING: So you hope — you hope it doesn’t hurt?

JINDAL: No. I hope that failed policies don’t get adopted. I want my country to succeed.

See, this is where it gets stupid. No one knows what will work, if anything. Bush tried tax cuts last year, and obviously they did not work. Obama is trying the other side of the coin, one which MANY economists advocate, which is using the government to inject the economy with money to get it going again.

It’s a tactic. It’s a tactic, and Obama has made it clear that it’s one he feels is necessary and not a blueprint for how to run government under normal conditions.

The only reason people would want this to fail is so they can say there were right. It very well COULD work. Jindal and Rush don’t know that it won’t work.

They hope if fails so they can be right.

Tom_Shipley on March 3, 2009 at 8:15 AM

I heard Larry is so old that all of his insides have been replaced with machine organs

blatantblue on March 3, 2009 at 8:15 AM

If doctors are going to go to all that trouble they should replace the outside, too, for the sake of the viewing audience.

Disturb the Universe on March 3, 2009 at 8:17 AM

Nicely done. I hope all republicans are prepared to handle the BS misdirected ‘fail’ line of questioning so well.

Midas on March 3, 2009 at 8:18 AM

I don’t know who this guy is (got to his site from the “Rush gave a bad speech” link), but he essentially makes the same point I just did:

http://www.scriptoriumdaily.com/2009/03/03/i-hope-president-obama-is-right-on-the-economy/

Tom_Shipley on March 3, 2009 at 8:18 AM

KING: So you hope — you hope it doesn’t hurt?

JINDAL: No. I hope that failed policies don’t get adopted. I want my country to succeed.

Better answer: It doesn’t matter what I hope. I know his socialist policies will hurt the nation.

Disturb the Universe on March 3, 2009 at 8:20 AM

I’m sure Allah will find fault with Jindal’s performance.

John Doe on March 3, 2009 at 8:20 AM

Good work Jindal . Steel is somewhat right when he says Rush is an “entertainer” but he needs to get a lot better of what he wants to say , losing your way in the liberal strawman fest is deadly.

the_nile on March 3, 2009 at 8:20 AM

Good job, Bobby.

I do believe that Michael Steele can learn from his mistakes and from the example of others.

myrenovations on March 3, 2009 at 8:20 AM

Don’t forget folks, he is only 37!

Borislav on March 3, 2009 at 8:20 AM

Tom_Shipley on March 3, 2009 at 8:15 AM

Spending more than you make has never ever worked. Communism has never ever worked. Insanity is trying the same thing over and over and over while expecting a different result.

doriangrey on March 3, 2009 at 8:21 AM

Bush tried tax cuts last year, and obviously they did not work.

That was a tax rebate, not a tax cut.

myrenovations on March 3, 2009 at 8:22 AM

It’s a tactic, and Obama has made it clear that it’s one he feels is necessary and not a blueprint for how to run government under normal conditions.

If you’re talking about Bob Obama at the corner Starbucks, you may be right. If you’re talking about Barack Obama, you’re not paying attention to what he’s saying *or* doing. I don’t even know where to begin with the lengthy list of clear examples where you’re “not a blueprint” comment is patently false or misinformed.

Midas on March 3, 2009 at 8:23 AM

It is amazing that nobody is focusing on a key part of Rush’s statement. The part about liberty. To paraphrase, if liberty is to be eroded we want Obama to fail.” So I guess anybody who does not agree with Rush is OK with the Government infringing on individual rights?

A reporter could just as easily listen to Rush and ask a democrat, “Do you want Obama to succeed at the cost of individual liberty and freedom?” or “Do you believe the Obama efforts are eroding liberty?”

Not going to hold my breath for the question to be asked.

Inzax on March 3, 2009 at 8:24 AM

I see what is going on. Bring every member of the Republican leadership in front of a camera to assassinate them with this easy to demonize “fail” argument. Good on Jindal for not taking the bait but, if you pay attention, King could care less about what Jindal is saying. He simply keeps rephrasing the question in order to get him on the record as being a “fail” guy. When he realizes that Jindal can dance around it, he ends the interview. The assassins on CNN are apparently working overtime; first Hughley and now King. The only thing I wish would emerge, would be a GOP leader to fire questions back at these hosts on their motives.

Levinite on March 3, 2009 at 8:24 AM

Great job Bobby. That’s the conservative I like. Larry got his feelings hurt from the joke Rush said? LOL!

jencab on March 3, 2009 at 8:25 AM

I don’t know who this guy is (got to his site from the “Rush gave a bad speech” link), but he essentially makes the same point I just did:

http://www.scriptoriumdaily.com/2009/03/03/i-hope-president-obama-is-right-on-the-economy/

Tom_Shipley on March 3, 2009 at 8:18 AM

He, too, is clueless as to what’s going on, what’s being proposed, what the effects will be, and what the oft and clearly explained “fail” comment means, even when stated in plain english.

Midas on March 3, 2009 at 8:25 AM

Bush tried tax cuts last year, and obviously they did not work. Obama is trying the other side of the coin, one which MANY economists advocate, which is using the government to inject the economy with money to get it going again.

You’re aware, of course, that Bush actually did both things, right? I’m pretty sure I got a check from Bush, and I’m pretty sure the banks all got a check from Bush.

And when that plan failed, what did we hear? That Bush didn’t flush enough money. And that’s where we are right now: every failed bailout and money injection is followed quickly by “we didn’t flush enough money!!”

Lehosh on March 3, 2009 at 8:25 AM

I see what is going on. Bring every member of the Republican leadership in front of a camera to assassinate them with this easy to demonize “fail” argument.

Just following their marching orders from the White House; I believe Gibbs said as much yesterday, inviting the press to do precisely this?

Midas on March 3, 2009 at 8:26 AM

There is a lot of effort on the Left (and that includes King and the rest of the media) to equate Obama’s policies failing with America failing.

It is so obviously a false equation that it seems to be a calculated and desperate effort to rally support to a floundering Administration.

cruadin on March 3, 2009 at 8:27 AM

Great job Governor!

JeffreyLloyd on March 3, 2009 at 8:27 AM

There’s not a reason on earth wyh Steele and Cantor couldn’t have responded just as well; I think Jindal is genuinely able to think on his feet- Steele and Cantor need to practice.

anniekc on March 3, 2009 at 8:28 AM

A reporter could just as easily listen to Rush and ask a democrat, “Do you want Obama to succeed at the cost of individual liberty and freedom?” or “Do you believe the Obama efforts are eroding liberty?”

The problem is that liberals do no believe that liberty is eroded when they chain a person or a communit or a country to a check from the government. The do not believe there is an erosion of liberty if the government confiscates 40% or more of what a person earns.

Their definition of liberty is different than that of conservatism.

myrenovations on March 3, 2009 at 8:28 AM

Tom_Shipley on March 3, 2009 at 8:18 AM

Hello Tom, may I ask you a few questions?

1) Al Gore yelled “GEORGE BUSH BETRAYED THIS COUNTRY” in a speech on National TV… Did he want Bush to suceed?

2) Harry Reid said the War in Iraq was “LOST” and that the “SURGE FAILED”…. Did he want Bush to suceed?

Can I go on… I have over FOUR DOZEN where your side wish Bush and AMERICA to fail… These where TOP POLITICAL LEADERS of the far left, your party, not a radio talk show guy… POLITICAL LEADERS, wanting AMERICA and Bush to fail.

I have tons more, please explain how these are different…

I can’t wait for this tap dance, oh wait, is that a racial comment, because we all know blacks can tap dance… /sarc

Mark Garnett on March 3, 2009 at 8:29 AM

I like how he sounds and what he delivers, but he looks like a stock boy from 7-11. I’m sorry. I don’t want to say that. He doesn’t appear tough. Its the impression I get when I see him or if he were on ‘closed caption only’ on an airport plasma screen I’d not know how intelligent he comes across. I think he did a fine job fighting the fossilized Larry King and the interruptions and I want to hear more.

johnnyU on March 3, 2009 at 8:29 AM

King was really fishing for a negative sound bite. He wasn’t even paying attention to the answers.

Ampersand on March 3, 2009 at 8:29 AM

It was a mistake for Jindal to act like he was an ordinary good ol’ boy last Tuesday. He isn’t. He is extraordinary. Unlike the Obamessiah, he actually put his degrees to use instead of relying on race politics to get ahead. Hes a smart, albeit boring to the masses, guy.

Speedwagon82 on March 3, 2009 at 8:30 AM

Dear Leader: l’etat, c’est moi.

Not buying it.

rbj on March 3, 2009 at 8:30 AM

Tom_Shipley on March 3, 2009 at 8:15 AM

I understand that in some ways we are in unchartered waters but tell me a single instance of someone in your family or that you think highly of where you would encourage that person drowning in dept to borrow and spend. It defies logic. We, as a government, are doing what we are ridiculing some homeowners for doing, but instead of a home being used as an ATM, we are using our future. Sorry, I just can’t agree with these tactics.

Cindy Munford on March 3, 2009 at 8:30 AM

Their definition of liberty is different than that of conservatism.

Agreed, just very frustrating that it has come to this. People in our own country having stood on the shoulders of liberty, jumping off into the pool of socialism, willingly.

Inzax on March 3, 2009 at 8:31 AM

Larry King must be very pissed at Rush, especially after the Larry King in heaven joke from CPAC. I think Rush has been tweaking him for a year now.

ebrawer on March 3, 2009 at 8:34 AM

Maybe King just doesn’t buy into the highly nuanced position of “I want the Patriots to win but Belichick to lose”

e-pirate on March 3, 2009 at 8:14 AM

False analogy. Try, I want the Patriots to win, but I want Belichick’s game plan–which in this case would involve putting ankle-weights on Tom Brady to “make it fair,” not allowing him to call audibles, not allowing the defensive linemen from deviating from the blocking pattern written on the play chart–to lose. Fixed it for you. To follow your analogy, King thinks there is no game plan, and no “Patriots,” as separate from Belichick–there is only an infallible Belichick who may not be criticized, nor his statements and position even examined.

smellthecoffee on March 3, 2009 at 8:37 AM

not allowing the defensive linemen from deviating to deviate. Grr.

smellthecoffee on March 3, 2009 at 8:38 AM

as separate from Belichick–there is only an infallible Belichick who may not be criticized, nor his statements and position even examined.

Does this mean Obama is going to start wearing baggy sweatshirts with the sleeves cut off in the Oval Office?

myrenovations on March 3, 2009 at 8:39 AM

King was obviously upset because he couldn’t get Jindal to agree with his and Obama’s Communist Party line. King is just another leftist slug spewing liberal talking points.

rplat on March 3, 2009 at 8:39 AM

If Sarah can learn to do better in her weakness (interviews), then Bobby can learn to do better at his (big speeches).

jgapinoy on March 3, 2009 at 8:40 AM

I love this guy (Jindal, obviously, not King). Can’t wait to vote for him.

zeebeach on March 3, 2009 at 8:40 AM

KING: Governor, do you think people are thinking about capitalism now or are they thinking about problems?

Larry’s verbal deceit is in rare form here. His question assumes that the Obama’s assault on capitalism in favor of socialism isn’t a problem. It is the problem!

That’s like Lowell Thomas in 1930′s asking “Governor, do you think people are thinking about the depression now or are they thinking about problems?”
Pravda journalism at it’s very finest. And yes, Jindal saw through it and did a stand-up job.

Crusty on March 3, 2009 at 8:40 AM

Maybe this is why Larry was unusually hostile:

One of the things that is totally erroneous about me — and I just want to get this up front — is that I’m pompous. [Laughter] And that I am arrogant. Neither of these things are remotely true. I can tell you a joke to illustrate this.

Larry King passed away, goes to heaven. He’s greeted by Saint Peter at the gates. Saint Peter says, “Welcome, Mr. King, it’s great to have you here. I want to show you around, give you an idea of what’s here, maybe you can pick a place that you’d like to reside.”

King says, “I just have one question: Is Rush Limbaugh here?”

“No, he’s got a lot of time yet, Mr. King.” So Saint Peter begins the tour. Larry King sees the various places and it’s beyond anything we can imagine in terms of beauty.
Finally, he gets to the biggest room of all, with this giant throne. And over the throne is a flashing beautiful angelic neon sign that says “Rush Limbaugh.” [Laughter]

And Larry King looks at Saint Peter and says: “I thought you said he wasn’t here.”

“He said, he’s not, he’s not. This is God’s room. He just thinks he’s Rush Limbaugh.”

So you see I’m not pompous.

garry on March 3, 2009 at 8:42 AM

Larry King has stained, torn underwear older than Jindal.
Where were these fossils like King asking “Do you want Bush to fail” for eight years. Give me a !#!@ break.

RobCon on March 3, 2009 at 8:43 AM

Q: Do you want President Obama to fail?

A: I want every socialist to fail.

jeff_from_mpls on March 3, 2009 at 8:45 AM

Hey at least Rush had Larry getting into heaven.

billhedrick on March 3, 2009 at 8:46 AM

Where were these fossils like King asking “Do you want Bush to fail” for eight years. Give me a !#!@ break.

RobCon on March 3, 2009 at 8:43 AM

They were far to busy calling for Bush’s impeachment to bother wishing him to fail.

doriangrey on March 3, 2009 at 8:46 AM

First Matthews, now King.

What is it about Bobby Jindal that prods TV commentators to invoke the name of God?

KingGold on March 3, 2009 at 8:47 AM

Tom_Shipley on March 3, 2009 at 8:18 AM

This is not that complicated. Stop playing word games and pay attention to what is actually being said.

In the context of the “I want him to fail” – Obama aleady succeeded with this plan. His success is getting the plan passed. The measurement of failure or success is getting his plans passed in the first place.

This is so annoying.

Obama already succeeded with the Stimulus Plan and the writer in the link agrees that the plan will fail.

That is what Rush was talking about. That is what everyone who agrees with the sentiment is talking about.

We want him to fail at getting his plans passed, because when Obama succeeds, everyone else fails.

The rest is moot and utterly pointless to even discuss. The article in that link is just beyond stupid.

The plan is bad, we know the plan will fail, but hey let’s hope it works out somehow. Huh?

You hope, against all hope, that you were wrong.

Hope won’t make a bad plan work.

Honestly, that was a terrible piece.

reaganaut on March 3, 2009 at 8:48 AM

If Sarah can learn to do better in her weakness (interviews), then Bobby can learn to do better at his (big speeches).

jgapinoy on March 3, 2009 at 8:40 AM

Or we could morph both of them together and get a super candidate. But seriously could someone please get Governor Jindal a speech coach to help him out.

Illinidiva on March 3, 2009 at 8:49 AM

Wow. Great job by Jindal…you can tell by the flicker of amusement in his eyes while Larry rolled tape that he knew this was coming and was adequately prepared. Notice Larry K doesn’t even seem to be listening to Jindal–his agenda was to kneecap the Louisiana governor ala DL Hughly style.

Btw, I believe the has-been host yelped “Christ” because Jindal made him crap in his Depends in total exasperation.

RepubChica on March 3, 2009 at 8:50 AM

Illinidiva on March 3, 2009 at 8:49 AM

Hey Illinidiva, this is off topic, but do you sing?

BigD on March 3, 2009 at 8:50 AM

Maybe King just doesn’t buy into the highly nuanced position of “I want the Patriots to win but Belichick to lose”

e-pirate on March 3, 2009 at 8:14 AM

And do you want the Socialist/communist to win? ” What does it profit a man to win the whole world and lose his own soul”.

Johan Klaus on March 3, 2009 at 8:53 AM

The Democrats have hit on this ‘divide and conquer’ routine to deflect attention from Obama’s disastrous transition, and the stimulus fiasco.

I can’t believe Frum is writing “Look! Rahm Emanuel says Rush is the leader of the Republicans, so we have to distance ourselves from Rush!” Is he really that stupid that he doesn’t see what’s going on?

Any Republican who falls for this should be a Democrat.

EnglishMike on March 3, 2009 at 8:53 AM

Mark Garnett on March 3, 2009 at 8:29 AM

Good points (questions) Mark. We also must not forget the speech Hillary gave where she stated that it is not unpatriotic to question the Bush administration and his motives.

Nicely done Ed… Jindal just showed all Republicans how to handle members of the Democrat Party media outlets. Hopefully Steele was watching and taking notes.

Keemo on March 3, 2009 at 8:53 AM

“The only reason people would want this to fail is so they can say there were right. It very well COULD work. Jindal and Rush don’t know that it won’t work”……Shipley

Tom,

“The Dow Jones industrial average plummeted below 7,000 at the opening bell and kept driving lower all day, finishing at 6,763 — a loss of nearly 300 points. Each of the 30 stocks in the index lost value for the day.”

It is clearly NOT WORKING!

And if you can follow world history, no, (none–zero) government spending policy has EVER rescued a nation’s financial troubles.

Being “right” is BS, and the last thing on the minds of every citizen that gets up in the morning, goes to work, and wonders if they will make ends meet at the end of the month is “who’s right” while Obama experiments with social and fiscal policy.

Rovin on March 3, 2009 at 8:54 AM

Maybe King just doesn’t buy into the highly nuanced position of “I want the Patriots to win but Belichick to lose”

e-pirate on March 3, 2009 at 8:14 AM

There was a program on the History channel, about 2 weeks ago, regarding a group of German conservatives who, in the 1930′s, advocated for the failure of Adolf Hitler.

Those bastards!

BPD on March 3, 2009 at 8:56 AM

Can Larry slam his fist on the desk hard enough? He really detests Limbaugh and Bobby. HA HA!

jencab on March 3, 2009 at 8:56 AM

Can we make Eric Cantor and Mike Steele watch this every morning?

hawksruleva on March 3, 2009 at 8:56 AM

It’s a tactic. It’s a tactic, and Obama has made it clear that it’s one he feels is necessary and not a blueprint for how to run government under normal conditions.

The only reason people would want this to fail is so they can say there were right. It very well COULD work. Jindal and Rush don’t know that it won’t work.

They hope if fails so they can be right.

Tom_Shipley on March 3, 2009 at 8:15 AM

I disagree.

I think Omaba has made it quite clear that this is how Government should work under normal conditions. That’s why his stimulus plan had so much money allocated in later years and why his budget projects deficits as far as the eye can see. Tax the rich, expand entitlements. Don’t see any temporary measures there.

There is no precedent in history where this has worked. If I’m wrong name one. Jindal and Rush only know what history has taught them which is more than you apparently know.

BrianA on March 3, 2009 at 8:56 AM

King: What if the policies work?

Translation: Hope and change!

shick on March 3, 2009 at 8:57 AM

If they were really confident that socialism would work, they wouldn’t be so touchy about our hoping it will fail.

Same thing with their odd obsession to pluck off one or two morally retarded republicans to vote with them in congress.

It’s as if these pygmies fully anticipate failure and are laying groundwork to avoid accepting responsibility for it.

jeff_from_mpls on March 3, 2009 at 8:58 AM

The only reason people would want this to fail is so they can say there were right. It very well COULD work. Jindal and Rush don’t know that it won’t work.

They hope if fails so they can be right.

Tom_Shipley on March 3, 2009 at 8:15 AM

Did it work when FDR tried it?

Johan Klaus on March 3, 2009 at 8:59 AM

Hey Illinidiva, this is off topic, but do you sing?

BigD on March 3, 2009 at 8:50 AM

Nope… Unless singing off key in the shower counts. I guess I’m going for more girl who always gets her way with the name than accomplished opera singer.

Illinidiva on March 3, 2009 at 8:59 AM

Love Jindal,I am glad he didn’t use his Mr Rogers voice.

TheSitRep on March 3, 2009 at 9:00 AM

Silly people. Obama IS our country now. Remember, we are the ones we’ve been waiting for…er… Hope, Change, and a mortgage in every pot… uhhhh….. Yes we can….. uh… Fired Up, Ready to Go…. We’ve got spirit yes we do, we’ve got spirit, how Bout you?… So many chants, I forget which ones are his.

Sugar Land on March 3, 2009 at 9:00 AM

Best answer giving to the Liberal mantra of “Limbaugh is the leader of the Republican Party”:

Rush Limbaugh is the leader of the Conservative Movement. But while we’re on the subject of leaders, what role does William Ayers have in the Democrat Party? Is he the leader, or is it Reverend Wright?

Keemo on March 3, 2009 at 9:01 AM

I think Jindal is showing brains and courage by making the media rounds like this after his poor performance last week.

He’s undoing the damage quite nicely in my opinion.

jeff_from_mpls on March 3, 2009 at 9:01 AM

King: What if the policies work?

Translation: Hope and change!

shick on March 3, 2009 at 8:57 AM

Translation: Hope in change!

TheSitRep on March 3, 2009 at 9:01 AM

Someone needs to get Jindal, Steele, Rush, Romney and maybe some others together, to come up with a coherent strategy for opposing Obama and Congress.

EnglishMike on March 3, 2009 at 9:01 AM

“unusually hostile Larry King”?? The man who features Joy Behr and Bill Mahr every month is known to go easy on Dims and hard on core conservatives. Mr. Softball/not is very partisan.

deedledee on March 3, 2009 at 9:02 AM

I give him a B+. Until each and every one who is interrogated by buffoons like Larry King and have the guts to say “Yes, Larry, I want socialist policies to fail. They have been tried and they never work.” – we will not have a leader of the GOP with the guts to stand up and denounce the Dems in Congress.

Sporty1946 on March 3, 2009 at 9:03 AM

Jindal had an excellent point at the end, where he talked about the markets seeking some predictability. Rule #1 of the stock market is that it doesn’t like uncertainty. This fall, the election built in a certain amount of uncertainty that Bush couldn’t avoid. But Obama has done nothing but increase uncertainty since being elected. Where’s all the plans that he said he had during the election?

All the market knows is that this government will spend tons of money on a bunch of failed companies, and take money from the successful ones. If I was a CEO, I’d be figuring out a way to make my company just BARELY break even, because extra profits are sure to be punished by this White House. The cycle of innovate/profit/expand will get largely stalled as long as the WH and Congress stays in their “evil business” mode.

hawksruleva on March 3, 2009 at 9:05 AM

I know some of you have seen this before, but this is really scary……..

Guess Who?

*I was born in one country, raised in another. My father was born in another country. I was not his only child. He fathered several children with numerous women. *

*I became very close to my mother, as my father showed no interest in me. My mother died at an early age from cancer. *

*Later in life, questions arose over my real name. *

*My birth records were sketchy and no one was able to produce a legitimate,reliable birth certificate. *

*I grew up practicing one faith but converted to Christianity, as it was widely accepted in my country, but *

*I practiced non-traditional beliefs & didn’t follow Christianity, except in the public eye under scrutiny. *

*I worked and lived among lower-class people as a young adult, disguising myself as someone who really cared about them. *

*That was before I decided it was time to get serious about my life and I embarked on a new career. *

*I wrote a book about my struggles growing up. It was clear to those who read my memoirs that I had difficulties accepting that my father abandoned me as a child. *

*I became active in local politics in my 30′s then with help behind the scenes, I literally burst onto the scene as a candidate for national office in my 40s. They said I had a golden tongue and could talk anyone into anything. That reinforced my conceit. *

*I had a virtually non-existent resume, little work history, and no experience in leading a single organization. Yet I was a powerful speaker and citizens were drawn to me as though I were a magnet and they were small roofing tacks. *

*I drew incredibly large crowds during my public appearances. This bolstered my ego. *

*At first, my **political campaign focused on my country’s foreign policy. I was very critical of my country in the last war and seized every opportunity to bash my country. *

*But what launched my rise to national prominence were my views on the country’s economy. I pretended to have a really good plan on how we could do better and every poor person would be fed & housed for free. *

*I knew which group was responsible for getting us into this mess. It was the free market, banks & corporations. I decided to start making citizens hate them and if they were envious of others who did well, the plan was clinched tight. *

*I called mine “A People’s Campaign” and that sounded good to all people. *

*I was the surprise candidate because I emerged from outside the traditional path of politics & was able to gain widespread popular support. *

*I knew that, if I merely offered the people ‘hope’ , together we could change our country and the world. *

*So, I started to make my speeches sound like they were on behalf of the downtrodden, poor, ignorant to include “persecuted minorities” like the Jews. My true views were not widely known & I needed to keep them unknown, until after I became my nation’s leader. *

*I had to carefully guard reality, as anybody could have easily found out what I really believed, if they had simply read my writings and examined those people I associated with. *

*I’m glad they didn’t. Then I became the most powerful man in the world. And the world learned the truth. *

*Who am I? ………*

*ADOLF HITLER. *

Rovin on March 3, 2009 at 9:05 AM

Good on Jindal.

Spirit of 1776 on March 3, 2009 at 9:06 AM

They hope [it] fails so they can be right.

Tom_Shipley on March 3, 2009 at 8:15 AM

All due respect Tom, you’re coming a little late with your concern about this way of thinking.

DrSteve on March 3, 2009 at 9:07 AM

Considering we heard the constant adoration and worship of “The One’s” speaking abilities during the election (teleprompter required ofcourse), it would be nice if someone in the media would pick up on the fact that when Republicans speak they actually do great without a teleprompter…..ie Michael Steele’s RNC chair acceptance speach, Rush’s CPAC address, and everything Jindal has done outside of the Obama rebuttal.
I’ve heard Obamabi stumble and stutter so bad at townhall meetings that he made Bush sound like Shakespeare.

tempestleo on March 3, 2009 at 9:08 AM

Tom_Shipley on March 3, 2009 at 8:15 AM

Your a coward and will not resond to legit questions… As a resident radical left rat troll you should at least have the stones to not be a hit and run poster…

Mark Garnett on March 3, 2009 at 9:11 AM

Now that Jindal has shown he can fend off the stupid Liberal harangue, don’t expect to see him too much on the MSM. Let’s see how long the Dems are going to pursue the “Republicans want the country to fail” line. This Begala-Emanuel concoction is too moronic for words. Careful, Dems: This strategy is going to backfire, because it won’t take long for the folks to realize that it’s the Dems that hope the country fails.

Hey, Rahmbo: This is America, not Potemkin Village. We are not starving for charismatic leaders to lead us through the dark night. We can survive anything. Even the likes of vermin like you.

EMD on March 3, 2009 at 9:13 AM

I heard Larry is so old that all of his insides have been replaced with machine organs

blatantblue on March 3, 2009 at 8:15 AM

I downloaded on my iPod Touch a software of “Yo Mama” jokes…I could pull out some and apply to LK!!!

Me thinks LK is ticked off @Rush for the heaven joke.

ProudPalinFan on March 3, 2009 at 9:14 AM

“What if the policies work”…
And that is where Jindahl can next time say…”I don’t want to gamble with the American peoples money, I want to use a system that has worked in the past, lower tax and business incentives”.
He could add…”The government gambled that Katrina would not do as much damage as it did…I won’t support failed policies that gamble with peoples lives.”
*
We need to do what the dems do, find a word and keep throwing it into the face of the people.
I vote for the word, “GAMBLE”…Tarp is a gamble, the bail out is a gamble, earmarks are a gamble…they are spinning the roulette wheel, throwing the dice, dealing from the bottom of the deck…the dems are addicted to gambling…they are taking the cookie jar money and playing the horses.

right2bright on March 3, 2009 at 9:15 AM

Fearless predictions revisited
Share Post Print
March 3, 2009 Posted by Scott at 6:06 AM (powerline)

In my fearless political predictions for 2009 I offered prediction number 9: “The mainstream media will agonize over the anti-democratic implications of the Senate filibuster.” Thanks to the New York Times for getting the ball rolling on that one so early this year.

Prediction number 4 was a little easier, but it isn’t looking bad either. It provided in part: “Rush Limbaugh will be the most important conservative spokesman.” Chris Cillizza observes the Democrats using Rush to divide and destroy the opposition to Obama. Cillizza quotes Paul Begala: “Rush is the bloated face and drug-addled voice of the Republican Party.” Is it too difficult for Republicans to get a handle on what is happening here? (powerline)

The second to last sentence sounds very familiar; as trolls here have used those words repeatedly when describing Limbaugh. This will be an interesting battle; Obama and the entire Liberal war room versus Rush Limbaugh. Thousands lined up against a single man… Doesn’t sound very fair does it now. Truth is, Rush has my family behind him, in front of him, and beside him; Rush has millions of families just like mine. This is WAR baby, and my family is loaded up and ready for this battle!

Keemo on March 3, 2009 at 9:15 AM

See, this is where it gets stupid. No one knows what will work, if anything. Bush tried tax cuts last year, and obviously they did not work. Obama is trying the other side of the coin, one which MANY economists advocate, which is using the government to inject the economy with money to get it going again.

Those were actually rebate checks.

True_King on March 3, 2009 at 9:16 AM

Speaking of talking points, how about this…

“The Democrats in Congress, under the leadership of President Obama, are spending money at somewhere between twenty and thirty times the annual rate that was spent on the Iraq and Afghanistan wars combined. Twenty to thirty times as much. What are you getting for that? Thirteen dollars a month in your paycheck? Who’s getting the rest? Follow the money folks.”

Immolate on March 3, 2009 at 9:16 AM

This is the new McCarthyism:

“Are you or have you ever been a Conservative?”

The MSM make make old Joe look like…Dr. Phil.

RadioFreeUSA on March 3, 2009 at 9:17 AM

Comment pages: 1 2 3