Obama DoJ bails out of death-penalty case
posted at 11:35 am on March 3, 2009 by Ed Morrissey
Eric Holder reversed the Department of Justice position on a death-penalty case last night in San Francisco, offering a 40-year sentence in a plea agreement for multiple murders. Michael Mukasey had refused to accept a plea bargain for gang leader Emile Fort on three counts of murder and two counts of attempted murder. The mother of one victim, a seven-week-old infant killed in a hail of gunfire intended for his father, objected:
President Obama’s Justice Department halted the death penalty trial of an alleged San Francisco gang leader Monday by accepting a 40-year prison sentence that the Bush administration had vetoed.
The plea agreement for Emile Fort remained on hold after a federal judge heard a tearful plea from a murder victim’s mother for a life sentence and summoned prosecutors to a closed-door session to describe their case against Fort.
Afterward, despite apparent irritation at his lack of authority to change the terms of the plea deal, U.S. District Judge William Alsup indicated he was likely to accept the agreement at a hearing today.
Fort, 27, is accused of committing three murders and attempting two others in 2003 and 2004 as a leader of a gang that fought for control of turf and drug trafficking at the Sunnydale public housing projects in Visitacion Valley. Police said one victim, a 7-week-old infant named Glenn Molex, was killed in his Bayview home in September 2003 by a shot fired from a passing car intended for his father.
Fort was arrested in July 2004 on state charges but was transferred to U.S. custody 16 months later when federal prosecutors obtained racketeering indictments against members of the gang.
I don’t support the death penalty for domestic crimes, but 40 years is not a sufficient sentence for Fort’s assassinations. Three murders from racketeering activities alone should net three consecutive life sentences, not an aggregate of 40 years. Under federal guidelines, Fort will be 63 when he gains eligibility for parole, while Glenn Molex and the other two victims will still be dead.
Ironically, California would have been much harsher on Fort than the feds. First-degree murder carries only two possible penalties in California: death, or life without parole. I doubt that there is a judge in California who would hesitate to make the sentences consecutive rather than concurrent even if a jury didn’t return a death sentence on any of the convictions. The state of California probably regrets conceding jurisdiction to the feds, and may not make that same mistake again in the future, as long as Obama and Holder are in office.
Holder betrayed California’s trust and the safety of its citizens by offering this plea agreements. Three premeditated murders and two attempts at murder make Fort a serial killer, and Holder just guaranteed that we will once again have him on the streets, rather than put away for life. This doesn’t do justice for the victims — which is what a Department of Justice exists to provide.









Blowback
Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.
Trackbacks/Pings
Trackback URL
Comments
Comment pages: 1 2 Next »
What does that mean in practice?
JiangxiDad on March 3, 2009 at 11:39 AM
Well that’s a major malfunction on your part. That scum Emile Fort deserves to die. Shame on Eric Holder for giving him sympathy.
SoulGlo on March 3, 2009 at 11:40 AM
Typical . . . liberals only support the death penalty for the unborn.
rplat on March 3, 2009 at 11:43 AM
So instead, the taxpayers of California have to pay for this POS’s life sentence now? I would think with California in a money crunch, they would just wipe the slate clean as far as the jails go and save the taxpayers alot of money.
So this scumbag who killed 3 people and missed 2 others, gets 3 square meals a day for the rest of his life, a workout gym, TV, and sanitary conditions?
Sometimes I wish for the old school jails with dirt floors and no sanitation. It was much cheaper for the taxpayers then.
TheHat on March 3, 2009 at 11:43 AM
If we cannot execute this scum, who can we execute?
OmahaConservative on March 3, 2009 at 11:44 AM
First the terrorists go free, then a slap down to victimes everywhere of radical gang violence. Welcome to the new USA folks, I hope this is the Administration that people like Allah, Broder, Steele, Snowe, Specter and Coillins along with all the other TRAITORS that want Conservativess to wish the Messiah suceeds instead of FAILS!!!
WTG idiots… Can you finaly see the pattern with this radical? Can you morons finaly see the error of ANY support for the Messiah and his cult followers? Are you jerks connecting the dots yet??? Stupid moderates and centerists and radical Liberals are destroying America… AND FAST!
Mark Garnett on March 3, 2009 at 11:44 AM
I have absolutely NO problem with drug dealers killing each other…but, when an innocent victim is gunned down, I say, drop the needle.
BTW, What the hell does this mean? Are you taking English lessons from Obama, Ed?
HornetSting on March 3, 2009 at 11:45 AM
Eric Holder knows that gang members that commit murder write children books while they are in jail. If we put him on death row, we will miss out on the great educational and falfilling children books that Fort is sure to write. Great foresight Holder!!!
WashJeff on March 3, 2009 at 11:45 AM
40yrs for 3 murders, and 2 attempted murders. Holy shit! That’s like 10 yrs for each murder and 5 for the 2 attempted. A manslaughter charge carries 15 years , i believe. This is disgusting.
MDWNJ on March 3, 2009 at 11:45 AM
But seriously, California has only executed 13 people since 1976. If only this piece of excrement had committed this crime in Texas. Then he would be toast.
carbon_footprint on March 3, 2009 at 11:45 AM
Totally. If anything, the death penalty is not applied enough.
lorien1973 on March 3, 2009 at 11:46 AM
Separate victims = consecutive sentences, preferably the death penalty. It’s unconsciousable that the DOJ would plea bargain this down to 40 years.
So, in obama america does it get pro-rated now? Murder two innocent victims and the sentence is 26 years? One innocent murder victim equals 14 years? Such a deal!
Blake on March 3, 2009 at 11:46 AM
Why do all your comments have a typeface that is impossible to read?
lorien1973 on March 3, 2009 at 11:46 AM
Wow! I mean really, is there anything, just one thing, that is good about the obama administration?
Spectreman on March 3, 2009 at 11:47 AM
Who is suprised?
Theworldisnotenough on March 3, 2009 at 11:47 AM
Oh I see, our government has become Orwellian where the departments take on irony.
Ministry of Love
Department of Justice
carbon_footprint on March 3, 2009 at 11:48 AM
No. He’s a federal prisoner and will be housed in a federal penitentiary. The doj have no say over state criminal cases.
Blake on March 3, 2009 at 11:48 AM
We might as well get used to this sort of ‘justice’.
Look at the rest of his cabinet:
Janet Napolitano, aka, Janet Reno’s long lost sister, has a problem with our law enforcement doing their jobs.
Mr. Turbo Tax doesn’t pay his own taxes, but he will allow the IRS to go after those who do the same.
They complained about Bush’s cabinet…this cabinet is gone full tard in less than three months.
HornetSting on March 3, 2009 at 11:48 AM
Yep, Orwellian. Department of the Treasury and Department of Homeland Security. It all makes sense now.
carbon_footprint on March 3, 2009 at 11:49 AM
AP degraded my membership to HA due to my support of searcher484. /sarc
Seriously, I just use a hidden html tag for sarchasm. Is it really hard to read?
WashJeff on March 3, 2009 at 11:50 AM
Oh, never mind.
Fuquay Steve on March 3, 2009 at 11:51 AM
I got cataracts reading your post.
MDWNJ on March 3, 2009 at 11:52 AM
The Messiah’s Auntie just called me……….she has 4 Felony warrants out for her for being here illegally…….she says that she talked to Blago and Rezko……and to “F-Word” Rahm….she says they all agree with AG Holder…..let the guy walk………..I mean it’s only multiple murder for crying out loud! It’s not like skipping out on your taxes…
Cinday Blackburn on March 3, 2009 at 11:52 AM
40 years? There really shouldn’t be any possibility of this guy ever getting out of prison.
myrenovations on March 3, 2009 at 11:53 AM
No justice. No peace.
Where’s Rev. Al?
Dr.Cwac.Cwac on March 3, 2009 at 11:54 AM
It means Ed is Catholic and takes his Catholicism seriously. I personally believe the Church is mistaken on capital punishment, but acknowledge that my position is based on public policy and not on the text of the Bible.
Outlander on March 3, 2009 at 11:56 AM
I’ll accept the plea if it is for 40 years of daily @nal rape. Sounds reasonable, no?
I know. I’m a sadistic b@stard that looooooooooooves violence!
Dr.Cwac.Cwac on March 3, 2009 at 11:56 AM
God bless the souls departed and grant them eternal peace. What kind of nation are we that devalues life so much? We will suffer the consequences for the thousands we have sent to death for convenience sake. Lord have mercy on us all.
Fuquay Steve on March 3, 2009 at 11:57 AM
I just skip over ‘em, too hard on my eyes.
OmahaConservative on March 3, 2009 at 11:59 AM
Show Pony chose a real good pimp boy to run Justice.
revolution on March 3, 2009 at 12:00 PM
Where was Buffy?
DeathToMediaHacks on March 3, 2009 at 12:01 PM
With time served and over crowding,…look for him to get his walking papers before age 63.
christene on March 3, 2009 at 12:02 PM
I have a somewhat off-topic question: Did Obama clear out all of the Bush appointed USA’s, like Clinton did? I know that Fitzgerald is staying on, but I hadn’t heard about any of the others.
myrenovations on March 3, 2009 at 12:02 PM
I shall take your advice and cease & decist.
WashJeff on March 3, 2009 at 12:03 PM
from what I can understand, but not made clear in this post/link, the 7 month old was killed in gang violence, as in the other victims were involved in gang/drug trafficking too, and there was some sort of turf war over who would control the housing development.
I interpret Ed as saying that when gangs fight and kill one another, not necessarily cause for death penalty… but I could be wrong about his position.
FLKraKa on March 3, 2009 at 12:03 PM
“Where’s Rev. Al?”
HEH
Buckaroo on March 3, 2009 at 12:04 PM
Since the Rev hasn’t made a peep,…I’ll assume the guy is black.
christene on March 3, 2009 at 12:06 PM
Rob a bank – Life in prison,
2 Murders, 3 attempted murders – 40 years.
There’s some logic.
Holder, you sir are a joke.
ammon_of_cs on March 3, 2009 at 12:06 PM
Thanks, but do us a favor and teach getalife & DTMH how to use the code.
OmahaConservative on March 3, 2009 at 12:07 PM
of course, I am what they call a cafeteria Catholic: I pick and choose which positions of the Church I agree with, and leave the others… don’t agree with the no death penalty
FLKraKa on March 3, 2009 at 12:07 PM
Any bets that if one shot at an armed intruder hit him and also hit an innocent there would be a much stiffer penalty from Eric ‘coward’ Holder?
jukin on March 3, 2009 at 12:07 PM
Got ‘ya.
HornetSting on March 3, 2009 at 12:07 PM
Still doesn’t explain the statement. Does the Catholic church have a specific stand for the death penalty depending or where the crime occurs. Also God sanctioned the death penalty for Jesus. So obviously it’s OK for us humans to carry out the death penalty. Just not murder as listed in Commandment # 6.
Zaire67 on March 3, 2009 at 12:08 PM
There is no parole in the Federal system. Where did you get this number?
vdocam on March 3, 2009 at 12:08 PM
Golly, this Administration is off to a great start…
D2Boston on March 3, 2009 at 12:09 PM
LOL, don’t forget capitalus (sp?)
FLKraKa on March 3, 2009 at 12:09 PM
Hanging a serial killer is a horrible crime and must be atoned for, while the murder of the innocent, not so much.
Note how the murder lover freaks barely mention the victims and downplay the number murdered.
Blake on March 3, 2009 at 12:09 PM
Emile Fort
OmahaConservative on March 3, 2009 at 12:09 PM
If you’re using Firefox, just hit “Control” and “+” together to increase font size (go up as many times as you want.)
IrishEi on March 3, 2009 at 12:10 PM
Guess we can forget any state transferring a murder case th the Feds now.
Maybe that’s the intent here. Reduce the criminal case load for DOJ so the lawyers can spend more time chasing down those evil dust producers.
rockmom on March 3, 2009 at 12:10 PM
I am sorry… domestic crime? Ed, honestly that made no sense… a gun shot killing another is domestic crime now?
Capital Punishment is coming back… like it or not.
upinak on March 3, 2009 at 12:11 PM
I wish I could get it through their heads to try to implement their ideas at the state-level instead of imposing them at the federal level.
WashJeff on March 3, 2009 at 12:11 PM
Don’t forget the Bush Administration. They need room to conduct a witchhunt.
HornetSting on March 3, 2009 at 12:12 PM
Is it really hard to read?
[WashJeff on March 3, 2009 at 11:50 AM]
Yes. If you are going to do it, pick a different font or use a larger point.
Dusty on March 3, 2009 at 12:12 PM
just kill this turd already, he deserves it.
can we send rabid emails to this judge?
UNREPENTANT CONSERVATIVE CAPITOLIST on March 3, 2009 at 12:12 PM
Cleveland.
DrSteve on March 3, 2009 at 12:13 PM
Just wonderful. Is Emile Fort being considered for a Cabinet post or something?
Holder and the rest of Osama Obama’s goons are making the nation safer for criminals.
MrScribbler on March 3, 2009 at 12:13 PM
I think my head just exploded.
moonsbreath on March 3, 2009 at 12:13 PM
I say we build Quonset huts on some uninhabited island in the Aleutians for these scum and give them basic survival gear. Problem solved.
Hey, it’s good enough for our brave troops.
IrishEi on March 3, 2009 at 12:13 PM
“I don’t support the death penalty for domestic crimes” recidivism among dead murderers = 0.
This piece of trash should be hanged in the public square.
dogsoldier on March 3, 2009 at 12:13 PM
Why? Why do this? How do the justify it?
Sefton on March 3, 2009 at 12:13 PM
The Catholic Church does not say capital punishment is wrong in toto. The catechism does provide rationale for executions . Sheesh…. will some one, anyone, read the Catechism before spreading misinformation?
MNDavenotPC on March 3, 2009 at 12:14 PM
Isn’t the murder of a seven week old infant just a late term abortion for the Obama-Mugabe regime?
Seriously, every time I think this incompetent, corrupt, scum of the earth administration has hit rock bottom, it digs deeper.
NoDonkey on March 3, 2009 at 12:16 PM
niice impression of KO :)
FLKraKa on March 3, 2009 at 12:18 PM
HA filters all style tage, so this (different fonts, etc.) is not possible. So I will just stop given the information presented.
Or, I could think like a regressive and implicitly claim that I know better than all of you and impose my choice on everyone.
WashJeff on March 3, 2009 at 12:19 PM
Sometimes it is better for all concerned to put down a rabid dog. Doesn’t make it pleasant. But it is necessary.
All the hugs, puppy kibble, and confinement to a cage isn’t going to turn a rabid dog nice.
There is indeed place in civilized society, should they wish to remain a civilized society, for capital punishment.
Emile Fort – rabid dog.
Eric Holder – danger to civilized society.
coldwarrior on March 3, 2009 at 12:20 PM
LOL! Thank you for making it easier to read.
OmahaConservative on March 3, 2009 at 12:21 PM
Awesome! I never knew that.
carbon_footprint on March 3, 2009 at 12:22 PM
phone numbers to contact the judge:
415-522-3684
415-522-2137
UNREPENTANT CONSERVATIVE CAPITOLIST on March 3, 2009 at 12:22 PM
Welcome to Deflation.
Since Pres. Obortion does not value life, at all, why would one expect stiff penalties for those who end the lives of others? Don’t forget, we are all just punishment for our parents mistakes.
Patterns, baby, patterns.
BobMbx on March 3, 2009 at 12:25 PM
Yes. It’s called the 10th month abortion plan, soon to be expanded to cover the cradle-to-grave cycle of human beings, since the pre-cradle term is already covered.
BobMbx on March 3, 2009 at 12:28 PM
This is surprising. In state courts, as far as I know, a judge can reject a plea deal.
Blake on March 3, 2009 at 12:30 PM
And here I thought Obama couldn’t realize any health care savings, he may end up surprising me.
NoDonkey on March 3, 2009 at 12:34 PM
Obama-Mugabe regime…….. thats a new low,even for this forum.
Equanim1ty found on March 3, 2009 at 12:38 PM
OK… I’m confused…
Why were the MURDER charges transfered to Federal Jurisdiction? Its clearly a STATE matter under the Constitution as these did not happen on Federal Property.
Racketeering is a Federal Crime, and should have been prosecuted by the Feds, but why can’t the State go after this guy for MURDER?
Romeo13 on March 3, 2009 at 12:40 PM
The judge does not have to accept the terms of a deal; the judge can hand down an appropriate sentence that is not a part of the plea. This is why, for our younger readers, we call them judges.
“Who are you to sit in judgement of me!”
“I am a judge. It’s my job”.
BobMbx on March 3, 2009 at 12:44 PM
These are not white collar crimes, and therefore they are viewed favorably by the current Administration.
unclesmrgol on March 3, 2009 at 12:46 PM
Such a plan wouldn’t be all that bad, if one clause was included:
3rd Party Abortions. I can think of a few folks who I’d to abort.
BobMbx on March 3, 2009 at 12:47 PM
Federal jurisdiction. Federal prison system. And I’m surprised California “ceded” jurisdiction, since double jeopardy doesn’t apply here — different laws. The Fed charges are racketeering, while the State charges would be murder.
Remember the Rodney King beating case? The officers got off on the State charges, only to be hauled up by the Feds on civil rights charges.
unclesmrgol on March 3, 2009 at 12:50 PM
Is this the same Catholic Church that ran the Spanish Inquisition?
.
Leviticus 24:17
17And he that killeth any man shall surely be put to death.
.
Maybe we’ll get lucky and he’ll annoy the wrong inmate. :-)
darktood on March 3, 2009 at 12:50 PM
You must not spend much time on Internet forums, particularly not any on the left. This is a wiffle ball compared to what they throw over there.
Seems to me, Obama is well on his to emulating Robert Mugabe in Zimbabwe.
They Democrats are already trying to make him President for life, by repealing the 22nd Amendment and by instituting vote rigging schemes led by ACORN. The Obama-Mugabe regime aided by the corrupt and incompetent Congress, is going to shovel billions to ACORN, an organization known for its efforts at vote fraud.
Meanwhile, the Obama-Mugabe regime is doing to our economy, what Robert Mugabe has done to the economy in Zimbabwe.
The sooner Obama-Mugabe is irrelevant and out of power, the better for our country. Obama-Mugabe is a miserable failure.
NoDonkey on March 3, 2009 at 12:52 PM
Well that would qualify him for a cabinet position in Dear Leader’s administration.
The real crime is in not wanting Dear Leader to reshape America into the United Socialist States of America.
rbj on March 3, 2009 at 12:56 PM
Maybe Mr. Fort can get some online counselling while he’s in the slammer from a MN nurse?
andycanuck on March 3, 2009 at 12:57 PM
Uh, no. A judge can reject the plea bargain but he can not change it. If he does, the prosecutor does not have to dismiss any counts and the defendant doesn’t have to accept the offer.
Blake on March 3, 2009 at 12:58 PM
There is a country where convicted murderes are given mandatory life sentences, in practice however this means serving an average of only 8-12 years. Can anyone name that country.
Equanim1ty found on March 3, 2009 at 1:09 PM
I’ll get a ration for this but I’m Catholic and I say put him down. Send the scum sucker on his way for his ultimate judgment.
VikingGoneWild on March 3, 2009 at 1:09 PM
The liberals are finally in charge.
Now we know, they really do believe all the nonsense they spout
Sackett on March 3, 2009 at 1:11 PM
A nation of cowards indeed!
dmann on March 3, 2009 at 1:25 PM
Almost, if not all, of the European countries.
Blake on March 3, 2009 at 1:25 PM
40?
QFT
- The Cat
P.S. Were’s Sam Waterson when you need him.
MirCat on March 3, 2009 at 1:31 PM
Eh. The Catholic Church has yet to put its money where its mouth is on abortion, so one can hardly take them seriously on the death penalty. The pope also said the US was mean to illegal immigrants and we should be more charitable to them, which is not a sign of infallibility.
I have big problems with people who go on and on about the value of cold stone killers and pay short shrift to their victims. Earlier, I posted a link where they are honoring a woman who murdered children and was hung over a hundred years ago. They are offering “forgiveness” Well, it is not theirs to give — it belongs to the children she murdered and they ain’t talking!
Blake on March 3, 2009 at 1:34 PM
Holder is the one who should be locked up for life, preferably in a cell with his buddy, here.
NoDonkey on March 3, 2009 at 1:35 PM
CHANGE!!!
revolutionismyname on March 3, 2009 at 1:36 PM
As a Californian, I’d like to offer the following to the AG: Thanks for nothin’, Tool.
juanito on March 3, 2009 at 1:37 PM
You can look for more of this to come. Holder’s got bigger priorities. Like prosecuting the previous administration.
GarandFan on March 3, 2009 at 1:38 PM
It is not taking long for this administration to prove they are unqualified to administrate this country. When will the American people recognize this, and will it be too late?
afotia on March 3, 2009 at 1:47 PM
Good Grief! That is so lame.
Wade on March 3, 2009 at 1:50 PM
Of course they’re qualified:
1) They’re Democrats
2) Many of them are members of sainted minority groups
What else is there?
Because if there’s anything else, they don’t have it. 1 and 2 are it, so you better be happy with it, because that’s it.
NoDonkey on March 3, 2009 at 1:51 PM
I believe this is just a taste of the anti-death penalty agenda which will slowly start making it’s way into policy. The administration is so drunk with power they either don’t realize people did not vote for this or they just do not care. This is an issue which will go along way in exposing to the masses what this administration is all about.
Howcome on March 3, 2009 at 2:22 PM
Comment pages: 1 2 Next »