<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: McCain goes nuclear on Obama over earmarks: &#8220;So much for the promise of change&#8221;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://hotair.com/archives/2009/03/03/mccain-goes-nuclear-on-obama-over-earmarks-so-much-for-the-promise-of-change/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/03/03/mccain-goes-nuclear-on-obama-over-earmarks-so-much-for-the-promise-of-change/</link>
	<description>The world’s first, full-service conservative Internet broadcast network</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 30 May 2012 19:17:52 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chronicles of Obama: Captain Earmark and the Sea of Debt &#124;</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/03/03/mccain-goes-nuclear-on-obama-over-earmarks-so-much-for-the-promise-of-change/comment-page-2/#comment-1947367</link>
		<dc:creator>Chronicles of Obama: Captain Earmark and the Sea of Debt &#124;</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Mar 2009 07:55:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=45656#comment-1947367</guid>
		<description>[...] Again, the real issue is not the earmarks of the republicans or the democrats but the silence of Obama during McCain&#8217;s question to the Senate, &#8220;How does anyone justify some of these earmarks: $1.7 million for pig odor research in Iowa; $2 million &#8216;for the promotion of astronomy&#8217; in Hawaii; $6.6 million for termite research in New Orleans; $2.1 million for the Center for Grape Genetics in New York.&#8221; (see video click here) [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Again, the real issue is not the earmarks of the republicans or the democrats but the silence of Obama during McCain&#8217;s question to the Senate, &#8220;How does anyone justify some of these earmarks: $1.7 million for pig odor research in Iowa; $2 million &#8216;for the promotion of astronomy&#8217; in Hawaii; $6.6 million for termite research in New Orleans; $2.1 million for the Center for Grape Genetics in New York.&#8221; (see video click here) [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ernest</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/03/03/mccain-goes-nuclear-on-obama-over-earmarks-so-much-for-the-promise-of-change/comment-page-2/#comment-1944047</link>
		<dc:creator>Ernest</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Mar 2009 17:16:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=45656#comment-1944047</guid>
		<description>Too little, too late McCain. You were tepid when you ran against him and now you talk tough? Where were your balls &lt;em&gt;then&lt;/em&gt;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Too little, too late McCain. You were tepid when you ran against him and now you talk tough? Where were your balls <em>then</em>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ex-Democrat</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/03/03/mccain-goes-nuclear-on-obama-over-earmarks-so-much-for-the-promise-of-change/comment-page-2/#comment-1943777</link>
		<dc:creator>ex-Democrat</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Mar 2009 16:14:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=45656#comment-1943777</guid>
		<description>Back on thread-topic:

Isn&#039;t McCain up for re-election in 2010?

He&#039;s just making campaign ads.

He is a JOKE. Don&#039;t forget McCain-Feingold, and the worst, that gang of 16 or whatever it was that was put together to cave to Dhimms on SCOTUS.

And then there&#039;s his TARP vote....the ONE TIME during the election campaign, when it&#039;s ALL on the table----the maverick-----votes for the biggest wasteful, lying, pile of manure in American history.

He&#039;s just trying now to hold on any conservative challenger for his Senate seat.

And yeah, I voted for &lt;strike&gt;him&lt;/strike&gt; her. Sarah is &lt;em&gt;still&lt;/em&gt; my girl.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Back on thread-topic:</p>
<p>Isn&#8217;t McCain up for re-election in 2010?</p>
<p>He&#8217;s just making campaign ads.</p>
<p>He is a JOKE. Don&#8217;t forget McCain-Feingold, and the worst, that gang of 16 or whatever it was that was put together to cave to Dhimms on SCOTUS.</p>
<p>And then there&#8217;s his TARP vote&#8230;.the ONE TIME during the election campaign, when it&#8217;s ALL on the table&#8212;-the maverick&#8212;&#8211;votes for the biggest wasteful, lying, pile of manure in American history.</p>
<p>He&#8217;s just trying now to hold on any conservative challenger for his Senate seat.</p>
<p>And yeah, I voted for <strike>him</strike> her. Sarah is <em>still</em> my girl.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ex-Democrat</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/03/03/mccain-goes-nuclear-on-obama-over-earmarks-so-much-for-the-promise-of-change/comment-page-2/#comment-1943769</link>
		<dc:creator>ex-Democrat</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Mar 2009 16:10:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=45656#comment-1943769</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;But it seems that some people think that abortion is a winning subject. &lt;/blockquote&gt;

I&#039;ve been pro-choice (propagandized) most of my life. Abortion will go the way of slavery and generations from now people will wonder how anyone could do it, let alone legalize and pay for it. It will need a very large holocaust museum on the Mall.

That is, of course, assuming the Obama administration is destroyed.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>But it seems that some people think that abortion is a winning subject. </p></blockquote>
<p>I&#8217;ve been pro-choice (propagandized) most of my life. Abortion will go the way of slavery and generations from now people will wonder how anyone could do it, let alone legalize and pay for it. It will need a very large holocaust museum on the Mall.</p>
<p>That is, of course, assuming the Obama administration is destroyed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Easydoesit</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/03/03/mccain-goes-nuclear-on-obama-over-earmarks-so-much-for-the-promise-of-change/comment-page-2/#comment-1943160</link>
		<dc:creator>Easydoesit</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Mar 2009 13:22:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=45656#comment-1943160</guid>
		<description>LOL!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>LOL!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: searcher484</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/03/03/mccain-goes-nuclear-on-obama-over-earmarks-so-much-for-the-promise-of-change/comment-page-2/#comment-1942486</link>
		<dc:creator>searcher484</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Mar 2009 03:21:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=45656#comment-1942486</guid>
		<description>PARTIAL LIST OF DOCUMENTS THAT BARACK OBAMA REFUSES TO RELEASE -. OBAMA’S  SECRECY AND “CLOSED RECORDS” POLICY 
Indonesian Passport – Not released
Application for U.S. Citizenship (as former citizen of Indonesia) – Not released
Immigration Records – Not released
Original Vault Copy Birth Certificate – Not released
Certificate of Live Birth – Counterfeit Version on Obama Web Site
Obama / Dunham Marriage License – Not released
Soetoro / Dunham Marriage License – Not released
Soetoro Adoption Records – Not Released
Fransiskus Assisi School Application – Not released
Punahou School Records – Not released
Selective Service Registration – Counterfeit version generated
Occidental College records – Not released
Columbia College Records – Not released 
Columbia Thesis – Not released
Harvard College Records – Not released
Baptism Certificate – None
Medical Records – Not released
Illinois State Senate Records – Not released
Law Practice Client List – Not released
University of Chicago Scholarly Articles – None</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>PARTIAL LIST OF DOCUMENTS THAT BARACK OBAMA REFUSES TO RELEASE -. OBAMA’S  SECRECY AND “CLOSED RECORDS” POLICY<br />
Indonesian Passport – Not released<br />
Application for U.S. Citizenship (as former citizen of Indonesia) – Not released<br />
Immigration Records – Not released<br />
Original Vault Copy Birth Certificate – Not released<br />
Certificate of Live Birth – Counterfeit Version on Obama Web Site<br />
Obama / Dunham Marriage License – Not released<br />
Soetoro / Dunham Marriage License – Not released<br />
Soetoro Adoption Records – Not Released<br />
Fransiskus Assisi School Application – Not released<br />
Punahou School Records – Not released<br />
Selective Service Registration – Counterfeit version generated<br />
Occidental College records – Not released<br />
Columbia College Records – Not released<br />
Columbia Thesis – Not released<br />
Harvard College Records – Not released<br />
Baptism Certificate – None<br />
Medical Records – Not released<br />
Illinois State Senate Records – Not released<br />
Law Practice Client List – Not released<br />
University of Chicago Scholarly Articles – None</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kooziegirl</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/03/03/mccain-goes-nuclear-on-obama-over-earmarks-so-much-for-the-promise-of-change/comment-page-2/#comment-1942278</link>
		<dc:creator>kooziegirl</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Mar 2009 02:27:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=45656#comment-1942278</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;why is anyone surprised by this?
obama LIES he is a laywer and all laywers LIE for a living..

jcila on March 3, 2009 at 7:24 PM&lt;/blockquote&gt;

But we are supposed to believe Baracko is the only politician to emerge from the swamp of Chicago politics with integrity intact.  Right.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>why is anyone surprised by this?<br />
obama LIES he is a laywer and all laywers LIE for a living..</p>
<p>jcila on March 3, 2009 at 7:24 PM</p></blockquote>
<p>But we are supposed to believe Baracko is the only politician to emerge from the swamp of Chicago politics with integrity intact.  Right.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kooziegirl</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/03/03/mccain-goes-nuclear-on-obama-over-earmarks-so-much-for-the-promise-of-change/comment-page-2/#comment-1942255</link>
		<dc:creator>kooziegirl</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Mar 2009 02:23:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=45656#comment-1942255</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;Your attempt at making illegal abortions immoral, is pathetic when compared to the lives that are taken by abortion.

right2bright on March 3, 2009 at 4:51 PM&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Pathetic and ignorant. 

Leftists are forced to steer the conversation about abortion away from the issue of killing human beings so any port in a storm will do. They cant bear the reality of it. Now that I think about it leftist libtards are emotionally retarded to the point they cant bear reality period.

&lt;blockquote&gt;Abortion is a dead issue and I don’t understand why on Earth conservatives choose to keep it alive.

 
Oh it’s alive. And it will be on your new electronic health record for your entire life. Instead of trying to forget a procedure you may have done at age 18 you get to see it again and again for the rest of your life. You can’t change doctors or move to another town…there it is on your record. It follows you. Like that stack of money you could be saving if you had switched to geico.

Rockygold on March 3, 2009 at 7:26 PM&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Yep they will have to deal with that decision their entire lives and that fact has little to do with electronic records. 

I know several women now in their 40&#039;s who still regret their decision to abort their babies over 20 years ago. Even now one who is a dear friend compares her precious children to the first one she never knew. Its sad to watch someone go through this kind of hell on earth. There is no way to hide from the fact that she killed her own child.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Your attempt at making illegal abortions immoral, is pathetic when compared to the lives that are taken by abortion.</p>
<p>right2bright on March 3, 2009 at 4:51 PM</p></blockquote>
<p>Pathetic and ignorant. </p>
<p>Leftists are forced to steer the conversation about abortion away from the issue of killing human beings so any port in a storm will do. They cant bear the reality of it. Now that I think about it leftist libtards are emotionally retarded to the point they cant bear reality period.</p>
<blockquote><p>Abortion is a dead issue and I don’t understand why on Earth conservatives choose to keep it alive.</p>
<p>Oh it’s alive. And it will be on your new electronic health record for your entire life. Instead of trying to forget a procedure you may have done at age 18 you get to see it again and again for the rest of your life. You can’t change doctors or move to another town…there it is on your record. It follows you. Like that stack of money you could be saving if you had switched to geico.</p>
<p>Rockygold on March 3, 2009 at 7:26 PM</p></blockquote>
<p>Yep they will have to deal with that decision their entire lives and that fact has little to do with electronic records. </p>
<p>I know several women now in their 40&#8242;s who still regret their decision to abort their babies over 20 years ago. Even now one who is a dear friend compares her precious children to the first one she never knew. Its sad to watch someone go through this kind of hell on earth. There is no way to hide from the fact that she killed her own child.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: patrick neid</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/03/03/mccain-goes-nuclear-on-obama-over-earmarks-so-much-for-the-promise-of-change/comment-page-2/#comment-1942194</link>
		<dc:creator>patrick neid</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Mar 2009 02:09:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=45656#comment-1942194</guid>
		<description>Until Snowe, Collins and Specter are publicly thrown out of the party the Repubs have no chance of a coherent policy that will attract others.

John McCain can rant all he wants. It&#039;s just hot air. Snowe, Collins and Specter will make certain that he/we have no voice.

Throw them out now. Mock them in the public square. There has to be a line that can&#039;t be crossed.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Until Snowe, Collins and Specter are publicly thrown out of the party the Repubs have no chance of a coherent policy that will attract others.</p>
<p>John McCain can rant all he wants. It&#8217;s just hot air. Snowe, Collins and Specter will make certain that he/we have no voice.</p>
<p>Throw them out now. Mock them in the public square. There has to be a line that can&#8217;t be crossed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Barrack</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/03/03/mccain-goes-nuclear-on-obama-over-earmarks-so-much-for-the-promise-of-change/comment-page-2/#comment-1941929</link>
		<dc:creator>Barrack</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Mar 2009 01:00:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=45656#comment-1941929</guid>
		<description>&quot;I have to tell you that he (Obama) is a decent person and a person you do not have to be scared of as president of the United States.&quot;

 - John McCain 10/10/08

Hey, Senator McCain.  Hate to say &#039;we told you so&#039; but......</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;I have to tell you that he (Obama) is a decent person and a person you do not have to be scared of as president of the United States.&#8221;</p>
<p> &#8211; John McCain 10/10/08</p>
<p>Hey, Senator McCain.  Hate to say &#8216;we told you so&#8217; but&#8230;&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: NoDonkey</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/03/03/mccain-goes-nuclear-on-obama-over-earmarks-so-much-for-the-promise-of-change/comment-page-2/#comment-1941876</link>
		<dc:creator>NoDonkey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Mar 2009 00:47:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=45656#comment-1941876</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;Your beloved tax cuts for individuals&lt;/blockquote&gt; 

For individuals who don&#039;t pay taxes. 

&lt;blockquote&gt;AND businesses are in the act.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

The ones that haven&#039;t gone out of business, due to the idiocies the Democrat Congress has been passing since 2006 and the further idiocies that our idiot President has been proposing since he unfortunately took office.  

&lt;blockquote&gt;The bill was never supposed to be JUST stimulus.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Super, because unless it was supposed to stimulate a market crash, that part is hard broke.  

&lt;blockquote&gt;In case you haven’t noticed, job losses are still happening. &lt;/blockquote&gt;

Really?  Could that possibly be because business owners have realized that our political leaders, Democrats most, are completely hostile to business and it&#039;s getting worse?  

Our recovery begins the moment Barack Obama is thrown out of the White House on his ass.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Your beloved tax cuts for individuals</p></blockquote>
<p>For individuals who don&#8217;t pay taxes. </p>
<blockquote><p>AND businesses are in the act.</p></blockquote>
<p>The ones that haven&#8217;t gone out of business, due to the idiocies the Democrat Congress has been passing since 2006 and the further idiocies that our idiot President has been proposing since he unfortunately took office.  </p>
<blockquote><p>The bill was never supposed to be JUST stimulus.</p></blockquote>
<p>Super, because unless it was supposed to stimulate a market crash, that part is hard broke.  </p>
<blockquote><p>In case you haven’t noticed, job losses are still happening. </p></blockquote>
<p>Really?  Could that possibly be because business owners have realized that our political leaders, Democrats most, are completely hostile to business and it&#8217;s getting worse?  </p>
<p>Our recovery begins the moment Barack Obama is thrown out of the White House on his ass.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: chunderroad</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/03/03/mccain-goes-nuclear-on-obama-over-earmarks-so-much-for-the-promise-of-change/comment-page-2/#comment-1941872</link>
		<dc:creator>chunderroad</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Mar 2009 00:47:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=45656#comment-1941872</guid>
		<description>This is a good time for Michelle&#039;s &quot;switch to decaf&quot; comment.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is a good time for Michelle&#8217;s &#8220;switch to decaf&#8221; comment.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rockygold</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/03/03/mccain-goes-nuclear-on-obama-over-earmarks-so-much-for-the-promise-of-change/comment-page-2/#comment-1941782</link>
		<dc:creator>Rockygold</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Mar 2009 00:26:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=45656#comment-1941782</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;Abortion is a dead issue and I don’t understand why on Earth conservatives choose to keep it alive.
&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Oh it&#039;s alive. And it will be on your new electronic health record for your entire life. Instead of trying to forget a procedure you may have done at age 18 you get to see it again and again for the rest of your life. You can&#039;t change doctors or move to another town...there it is on your record. It follows you. Like that stack of money you could be saving if you had switched to geico.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Abortion is a dead issue and I don’t understand why on Earth conservatives choose to keep it alive.
</p></blockquote>
<p>Oh it&#8217;s alive. And it will be on your new electronic health record for your entire life. Instead of trying to forget a procedure you may have done at age 18 you get to see it again and again for the rest of your life. You can&#8217;t change doctors or move to another town&#8230;there it is on your record. It follows you. Like that stack of money you could be saving if you had switched to geico.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jcila</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/03/03/mccain-goes-nuclear-on-obama-over-earmarks-so-much-for-the-promise-of-change/comment-page-2/#comment-1941775</link>
		<dc:creator>jcila</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Mar 2009 00:24:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=45656#comment-1941775</guid>
		<description>why is anyone surprised by this?
obama LIES he is a laywer and all laywers LIE for a living..

Sheesh come on people its just like social security
forget about it its gone..
your moeny was stolen get over it..</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>why is anyone surprised by this?<br />
obama LIES he is a laywer and all laywers LIE for a living..</p>
<p>Sheesh come on people its just like social security<br />
forget about it its gone..<br />
your moeny was stolen get over it..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: GarandFan</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/03/03/mccain-goes-nuclear-on-obama-over-earmarks-so-much-for-the-promise-of-change/comment-page-2/#comment-1941762</link>
		<dc:creator>GarandFan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Mar 2009 00:23:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=45656#comment-1941762</guid>
		<description>Gots to have that pork.

Guess McCain, as well as a couple of news columnists are finally beginning to wake up.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Gots to have that pork.</p>
<p>Guess McCain, as well as a couple of news columnists are finally beginning to wake up.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Entelechy</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/03/03/mccain-goes-nuclear-on-obama-over-earmarks-so-much-for-the-promise-of-change/comment-page-2/#comment-1941650</link>
		<dc:creator>Entelechy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Mar 2009 23:58:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=45656#comment-1941650</guid>
		<description>“American Recovery AND Reinvestment Act”

It should be named ADDA, the American Devastation and Destruction Act.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>“American Recovery AND Reinvestment Act”</p>
<p>It should be named ADDA, the American Devastation and Destruction Act.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Entelechy</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/03/03/mccain-goes-nuclear-on-obama-over-earmarks-so-much-for-the-promise-of-change/comment-page-2/#comment-1941641</link>
		<dc:creator>Entelechy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Mar 2009 23:56:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=45656#comment-1941641</guid>
		<description>&lt;a href=&quot;http://porkbusters.org/scorecard.php&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Pigs, in descending order&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://porkbusters.org/scorecard.php" rel="nofollow">Pigs, in descending order</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: OneConservative</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/03/03/mccain-goes-nuclear-on-obama-over-earmarks-so-much-for-the-promise-of-change/comment-page-2/#comment-1941561</link>
		<dc:creator>OneConservative</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Mar 2009 23:34:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=45656#comment-1941561</guid>
		<description>It is TOOOOOOOOO LATE senator! 


You had a great pick in Sarah. You should have become the prez, but, somehow you found The One to be handled with kid gloves. See what you did?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It is TOOOOOOOOO LATE senator! </p>
<p>You had a great pick in Sarah. You should have become the prez, but, somehow you found The One to be handled with kid gloves. See what you did?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jcrue</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/03/03/mccain-goes-nuclear-on-obama-over-earmarks-so-much-for-the-promise-of-change/comment-page-2/#comment-1941469</link>
		<dc:creator>jcrue</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Mar 2009 23:11:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=45656#comment-1941469</guid>
		<description>presidential McCain showed up six months too late....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>presidential McCain showed up six months too late&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ckoeber</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/03/03/mccain-goes-nuclear-on-obama-over-earmarks-so-much-for-the-promise-of-change/comment-page-2/#comment-1941330</link>
		<dc:creator>ckoeber</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Mar 2009 22:42:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=45656#comment-1941330</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;blockquote&gt;Barack Obama EASILY counters with a DIRECT reference to jobs, education, healthcare, etc.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

I see you ignored my earlier answer to your question, so I’ll post it again.

&lt;blockquote&gt;the Republicans said they would vote for actual “stimulus” in the “stimulus Bill”. They would work with Obama to do so.

They asked him to get Pelosi to separate out all the social spending, earmarks, etc., and give them a clean stimulus Bill to vote on.

He didn’t do that.

So now we have a bloated piece of crap, that increases spending so much that it obviates any possible stimulative effect of the spending.
&lt;/blockquote&gt;
How much attention did that get?

The media completely ignored it.

Republicans will get NOTHING for working with this inept incompetent, except kicked in the groin.

If they do help, he’ll claim all of the credit and do everything possible to minimize their participation, if things go well.

If anything goes wrong, they’ll get blamed.

That’s how Barry rolls.

NoDonkey on March 3, 2009 at 4:53 PM&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Incorrect. The bill was never supposed to be JUST stimulus. That&#039;s why it is named the &quot;American Recovery AND Reinvestment Act&quot;.

Everyone here can point to a portion of the act THEY feel won&#039;t do enough to fix the economy right now. The bill, however, was not meant to just stimulate the economy for six months and then fall flat like the previous administration&#039;s tax rebates/cuts.

INSTEAD, the Act voted into law is meant to work on a variety of sectors of society that need help right now.

In case you haven&#039;t noticed, job losses are still happening. That&#039;s why unemployment benefits are in the act.

Your beloved tax cuts for individuals AND businesses are in the act.

Expanded healthcare for people who need it NOW is in the act.

You mean to tell me that out of all of the good items in the act the GOP/Conservatives couldn&#039;t vote for the bill because less than 3% of it they disagree with?

Let&#039;s get serious.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><blockquote>Barack Obama EASILY counters with a DIRECT reference to jobs, education, healthcare, etc.</p></blockquote>
<p>I see you ignored my earlier answer to your question, so I’ll post it again.</p>
<blockquote><p>the Republicans said they would vote for actual “stimulus” in the “stimulus Bill”. They would work with Obama to do so.</p>
<p>They asked him to get Pelosi to separate out all the social spending, earmarks, etc., and give them a clean stimulus Bill to vote on.</p>
<p>He didn’t do that.</p>
<p>So now we have a bloated piece of crap, that increases spending so much that it obviates any possible stimulative effect of the spending.
</p></blockquote>
<p>How much attention did that get?</p>
<p>The media completely ignored it.</p>
<p>Republicans will get NOTHING for working with this inept incompetent, except kicked in the groin.</p>
<p>If they do help, he’ll claim all of the credit and do everything possible to minimize their participation, if things go well.</p>
<p>If anything goes wrong, they’ll get blamed.</p>
<p>That’s how Barry rolls.</p>
<p>NoDonkey on March 3, 2009 at 4:53 PM</p></blockquote>
<p>Incorrect. The bill was never supposed to be JUST stimulus. That&#8217;s why it is named the &#8220;American Recovery AND Reinvestment Act&#8221;.</p>
<p>Everyone here can point to a portion of the act THEY feel won&#8217;t do enough to fix the economy right now. The bill, however, was not meant to just stimulate the economy for six months and then fall flat like the previous administration&#8217;s tax rebates/cuts.</p>
<p>INSTEAD, the Act voted into law is meant to work on a variety of sectors of society that need help right now.</p>
<p>In case you haven&#8217;t noticed, job losses are still happening. That&#8217;s why unemployment benefits are in the act.</p>
<p>Your beloved tax cuts for individuals AND businesses are in the act.</p>
<p>Expanded healthcare for people who need it NOW is in the act.</p>
<p>You mean to tell me that out of all of the good items in the act the GOP/Conservatives couldn&#8217;t vote for the bill because less than 3% of it they disagree with?</p>
<p>Let&#8217;s get serious.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JeffinOrlando</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/03/03/mccain-goes-nuclear-on-obama-over-earmarks-so-much-for-the-promise-of-change/comment-page-2/#comment-1941291</link>
		<dc:creator>JeffinOrlando</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Mar 2009 22:32:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=45656#comment-1941291</guid>
		<description>I know I should listen to the Mav before commenting but I don&#039;t listen to John McModerate anymore. EVAH! So let me just say to the Senator, IT&#039;S YOUR FAULT DIPPITY. 
I feel better........</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I know I should listen to the Mav before commenting but I don&#8217;t listen to John McModerate anymore. EVAH! So let me just say to the Senator, IT&#8217;S YOUR FAULT DIPPITY.<br />
I feel better&#8230;&#8230;..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: clemycali</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/03/03/mccain-goes-nuclear-on-obama-over-earmarks-so-much-for-the-promise-of-change/comment-page-2/#comment-1941181</link>
		<dc:creator>clemycali</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Mar 2009 22:07:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=45656#comment-1941181</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;Did more females die trying to obtain illegal abortions, then were aborted?
Your attempt at making illegal abortions immoral, is pathetic when compared to the lives that are taken by abortion.&lt;/blockquote&gt;
I don&#039;t attempt to do anything. I don&#039;t evan try to say that abortion is moral or imoral, I simply can&#039;t understand the fixation about this issue. I just stated some things from my own experience and dared to say that abortion is not something that can gain votes for the conservative movement or the GOP. It&#039;s a sacrad cow for the conservative base but it&#039;s a looser with more moderate voters, with women in general with young people. If the ideea of banning abortion would be so popular South Dakota wouldn&#039;t have overurned on november ballot the ban imposed by the state congress. And South Dakota is not a liberal state as far as I remember. And of course you have to answer the judicial question:if you make abortion illegal what is the punishment for it? But who cares about such small things.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Did more females die trying to obtain illegal abortions, then were aborted?<br />
Your attempt at making illegal abortions immoral, is pathetic when compared to the lives that are taken by abortion.</p></blockquote>
<p>I don&#8217;t attempt to do anything. I don&#8217;t evan try to say that abortion is moral or imoral, I simply can&#8217;t understand the fixation about this issue. I just stated some things from my own experience and dared to say that abortion is not something that can gain votes for the conservative movement or the GOP. It&#8217;s a sacrad cow for the conservative base but it&#8217;s a looser with more moderate voters, with women in general with young people. If the ideea of banning abortion would be so popular South Dakota wouldn&#8217;t have overurned on november ballot the ban imposed by the state congress. And South Dakota is not a liberal state as far as I remember. And of course you have to answer the judicial question:if you make abortion illegal what is the punishment for it? But who cares about such small things.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: cannonball</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/03/03/mccain-goes-nuclear-on-obama-over-earmarks-so-much-for-the-promise-of-change/comment-page-2/#comment-1941176</link>
		<dc:creator>cannonball</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Mar 2009 22:06:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=45656#comment-1941176</guid>
		<description>This is not the John McCain I knew. The John McCain I knew was not passionate and only got cranky at other Conservatives. 

Mr. McCain, my friend, I appreciate your comments and passion, I thank you for your dedication to American, but you jumped the shark eight years ago.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is not the John McCain I knew. The John McCain I knew was not passionate and only got cranky at other Conservatives. </p>
<p>Mr. McCain, my friend, I appreciate your comments and passion, I thank you for your dedication to American, but you jumped the shark eight years ago.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: HornetSting</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/03/03/mccain-goes-nuclear-on-obama-over-earmarks-so-much-for-the-promise-of-change/comment-page-2/#comment-1941160</link>
		<dc:creator>HornetSting</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Mar 2009 22:04:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=45656#comment-1941160</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;
NYC :-)

ernesto on March 3, 2009 at 5:00 PM
&lt;/blockquote&gt;

SUX :&gt;)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>
NYC :-)</p>
<p>ernesto on March 3, 2009 at 5:00 PM
</p></blockquote>
<p>SUX :&gt;)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ernesto</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/03/03/mccain-goes-nuclear-on-obama-over-earmarks-so-much-for-the-promise-of-change/comment-page-2/#comment-1941139</link>
		<dc:creator>ernesto</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Mar 2009 22:00:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=45656#comment-1941139</guid>
		<description>NYC :-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>NYC :-)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
