Quotes of the day
posted at 10:35 pm on March 2, 2009 by Allahpundit
“The fact is that the GOP has been doing precisely what it claims it wants to do now – helping moderate and liberal Republicans it sees as more electable, at the expense of conservatives. Cornyn’s plan is nothing new. It has been tried and it has failed.
It is non-conservative Republicans who have gotten the party to where it is today. It is the massive spending and government enlargement that have forced a significant part of the base to abandon the GOP. It is the pork projects and the related corruption of ‘moderates’ that have dragged down the Republican brand. The people who have decidedly not been the downfall of the Republican Party are its conservatives.”
***
“What Limbaugh fails to understand is that any successful political movement is built of both true believers and evangelizers. True believers, like Limbaugh and Sean Hannity, fire up the troops. They tell their followers exactly what they want to hear, and they instinctively resist any compromise of their hallowed principles. As a general rule, true believers live and work and worship among other true believers, and they like it that way…
It should hardly come as a surprise that true believers aren’t always fond of evangelizers. After all, evangelizers tell true believers things they don’t want to hear. Just as devout Saudi Muslims are quick to question the Islamic credentials of Bengali and Malay and American Muslims who mingle freely with nonbelievers, Limbaugh is enraged by the likes of David Brooks and David Frum and Jim Manzi and Ramesh Ponnuru, conservatives who consort with the liberal enemy. Though all of these writers and thinkers disagree amongst themselves about a great deal, they share a basic belief that the party needs to do more than just promise tax cuts we can’t afford. And they recognize that a healthy political movement is always open to new ideas, and to questioning old convictions.”
***
“Rush knows what he is doing. The worse conservatives do, the more important Rush becomes as leader of the ardent remnant. The better conservatives succeed, the more we become a broad national governing coalition, the more Rush will be sidelined.
But do the rest of us understand what we are doing to ourselves by accepting this leadership? Rush is to the Republicanism of the 2000s what Jesse Jackson was to the Democratic party in the 1980s. He plays an important role in our coalition, and of course he and his supporters have to be treated with respect. But he cannot be allowed to be the public face of the enterprise – and we have to find ways of assuring the public that he is just one Republican voice among many, and very far from the most important.”









Blowback
Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.
Trackbacks/Pings
Trackback URL
Comments
Comment pages: « Previous 1 2 3
This is a classic “Alinsky Style” attack on Rush, and on Conservatives. Dems, along with their partners (the MSM) are trying to define Republicans to America. Unfortunately, the definition they are feeding to the public is THEIR version of what Conservatism is and not the true definition.
Great article HERE.
Conservative_SAHM on March 3, 2009 at 7:51 AM
Cold Warrior, excellent post. You nailed it. Hope you don’t mind me sharing it with others.
americanpatriot on March 3, 2009 at 7:55 AM
David Frum is a retarded Clymer!
sabbott on March 3, 2009 at 7:58 AM
This is a pretty transparent “claim him or shame him” move against Limbaugh by the White House. If they can reduce a political movement to a caricature of a man, they don’t have to deal with the ideas and principles the movement represents.
I’m a libertarian-leaning guy who voted Republican in the last election, and I suspect by the lights of some of the commenters here I’d fall in the dreaded “moderate” camp, especially since I’m not a social conservative at all. But let me put a stake in the ground for those of us here who fit that general description: I have motivations for my political philosophy other than fear of what liberals think of me.
Frum, on the other hand, is a stomach-turning coward who would rather use the Republican guy or gal sitting next to him as an ideological human shield than call out a sniping liberal. And for all his comments about conservatism having to return to its basis in ideas, I can’t think of a good policy idea he’s ever had. Brooks and Parker are exactly the same way. Conservatism is not going to be intellectually revived or politically rebranded as low-calorie liberalism.
“What do we want?”
“A 24.7 percent increase in the federal budget rather than a 27.9 percent increase!”
“When do we want it?”
“Over eight years instead of seven.”
Get it, Mr. Frum?
DrSteve on March 3, 2009 at 8:23 AM
I find this comparison offensive.
Not that it matters since I will not riot or decapitate anyone in response.
Disturb the Universe on March 3, 2009 at 8:25 AM
As much as I respect Rush, I feel he did us a great disservice, he should have held his own party accountable in a substantive way when he had a chance.
I too feel a sense of responsibility since I was not as politically aware at the time as I am now.
True_King on March 3, 2009 at 8:51 AM
Obama’s Orwellian thugs would like nothing better than to finish off the Republicans and cap them with a smug epitaph.
Never will that happen. The Republicans might finish off themselves but there will always be a strong conservative heartbeat in America–a heartbeat that can become the drumbeat of revolution when its survival is threatened.
RandyChandler on March 3, 2009 at 8:52 AM
What a joke. This administration acts like their major concern right now is an influential conservative radio talk show host. Seriously, haven’t they got more important issues on their plate right now? It seems they’re using Mr. Limbaugh as a smoke screen to cover up the fact their economic policies haven’t done anything positive and the radio show host is making that abundantly clear. They’d best channel their energies towards doing what they were elected to do, or they will fail. And they’ll have no one to blame but themselves.
scalleywag on March 3, 2009 at 9:05 AM
True_King, I think one of Rush’s points was that conservatism works every time it’s tried. That he wants the government to support individual liberty and oppose redistribution. He said a lot of stuff that probably stung if you’re a tax-and-spend Republican.
hawksruleva on March 3, 2009 at 9:09 AM
Feel free…and thanks for that.
coldwarrior on March 3, 2009 at 9:37 AM
Look…the last election was the political equivalent of the extinction event at the K-T boundary for conservative dinosaurs.
Failure to evolve is not an option.
strangelet on March 3, 2009 at 10:18 AM
it’s begining to look like Allahpundit has an deep obsession with Rush. It’s more than mere jealousy.
notagool on March 3, 2009 at 10:27 AM
Coldwarrior amazing post. Thank you for sharing.
Your story of the Marxist and Capitalist viewing the mansion was spot on and your analogy using Bill Gates supported the assertion perfectly.
I see Athensboy hasn’t responded to that thrashing either.
Pattosensei on March 3, 2009 at 10:28 AM
Strangelet, don’t look now but it appears that your savior’s grand scheme is crashing and burning on Wall Street and Main Street. Obama’s grandiose plan is the only thing heading for eventual extinction. The sad thing is that it will have a very high casualty count.
RandyChandler on March 3, 2009 at 10:32 AM
(Click)
Kralizec on March 3, 2009 at 10:47 AM
Allah? I read that twice…it’s half baked, put that one back in the oven and turn back on the timer. Jackson = Rush…wth? Jackson represented allot less of the Dem party compaired to what Rush currently represents to Con/rep. Your anti-Rush slip is showing a bit. Might be a little TP hangin out too. // ~B
Brian on March 3, 2009 at 10:55 AM
Randy, the stimulus bill isn’t your problem.
This is your problem.
strangelet on March 3, 2009 at 11:45 AM
Actually, yes we regulars at HotAir do have the power to express our dislike of Allahpundt’s snarky RINOism. I intend to bring this up with Michelle in person next time she comes for a book-signing or event in my area (I have met her 3 times before). And no, I am not alone in feeling this way.
Allah is unecessarily antagonistic towards a majority of his readers. And as the declining webratings suggests, it is not some ingenious way to generate traffic, rather the opposite.
Norwegian on March 3, 2009 at 11:47 AM
Wrong, strangelet, a shrinking Republican base isn’t my problem. Conservatives aren’t going to suddenly drop off the earth, no matter what silliness those whacky Republicans get up to.
However, you may have a language problem in calling a behemoth spending bill a stimulus bill. That Orwellian newspeak says it all, doesn’t it?
RandyChandler on March 3, 2009 at 12:01 PM
By the way, I wouldn’t rule out the sudden rise of a viable third party, given the teetering state of the world. If a slick-talking no-experience novice like Obama can win the presidency, then anything is possible. A real political revolution may be in the cards–after the chaos Obama will create.
RandyChandler on March 3, 2009 at 12:07 PM
My guess? Torx screwdriver.
MadisonConservative on March 3, 2009 at 12:11 PM
+1
I needed the laugh!
Al in St. Lou on March 3, 2009 at 1:39 PM
That’s what I’m talking about. ((Are we supposed to get out the vote for Specter like when Bush begged us the last time?)) We get here time and again. Who REALLY controls the RNC? This is PRECISELY why they won’t see my dollars for a long, long, long, long, long time. There’s way too much cleaning up to do around there.
Sultry Beauty on March 3, 2009 at 6:35 PM
Comment pages: « Previous 1 2 3