Limbaugh rips Steele for calling his show “ugly”; Update: Longer excerpt added; Update: Audio added
posted at 3:30 pm on March 2, 2009 by Allahpundit
No transcript or audio yet, but Matt Lewis has bits and pieces. The media’s going to wet itself at the prospect of a conservative civil war, so here’s the first post of doubtless many more to come.
“The Republican National Committee and Michael Steele need a little leadership … we’re going to have to drag them kicking and screaming back to our core,” Limbaugh said. “They are caught up in so much fear because of where they live and work in Washington, DC,” he said.
Responding to Steele’s argument that he is the “de facto” head of the GOP, Limbaugh warned: “Michael Steele — you are head of the RNC — you are not head of the Republican Party.” Limbaugh went on to say Steele would have to become President for that to happen. He also noted: “… I’m not in charge of the Republican Party, and I don’t want to be.”
There’s more at the link, although you’d benefit from watching the video of Steele criticizing him first if you missed it yesterday. My point then, and Ace’s point today, is that pandering to centrists is a political fact of life for politicians. Steele and Cantor, when forced to choose between criticizing Limbaugh and having to explain his “I hope he fails” rhetoric over and over again, will take the former every time: Right-wing partisans will turn out against Obama anyway in four years but the middle has to be wooed, and defending a sentiment about failure in the current political climate while The One’s busy framing himself as Mr. Nonpartisan does not a winning “moderate” message make. No wonder Gibbs is urging the media to keep asking Republicans whether they agree with Limbaugh. If they say yes, they’re vindictive partisans and if they say no they’ll get hammered by Rush on his show. The upshot:
“Steele is playing with fire,” said one longtime Republican adviser close to House Republicans and both Bush families. Of concern is that Steele, the party’s first black chairman, will be attacked by Limbaugh and other talk show hosts, further splitting the party…
Republicans are concerned that a feud between the national party and conservative talk radio would upset donors, who would stop giving to the party. “One possible outcome is that giving by the base, sickly for the last few years, could get even worse,” said a key GOP donor. Steele’s supporters, however, say that he is not trying to pick a fight with conservative radio and is just trying to counter Democratic charges that Limbaugh—who has engaged in a verbal war with President Obama—is the de facto boss of the party. He is also trying to put the word out there that the GOP is open to other viewpoints.
Exit question via Ace: Why is Rush taking this personally? He knows the political game that’s being played here and why Steele, in his leadership role, has to navigate away from hyperpartisan rhetoric. For that matter, why is he so insistent on challenging Steele’s claim to be the current head of the GOP? Who else is it if not him?
Update: With all due love and respect for the boss, I think she’s in the extreme minority of the conservative base these days if she truly believes “there’s nothing wrong with criticizing Rush Limbaugh.” I’m not sure why she’s reading Steele labeling Rush an “entertainer” so derisively, either. Hugh Hewitt, among others, also calls him that. Steele’s point, I thought, wasn’t that there’s something wrong with entertainers but merely that our expectations of their rhetoric have to be calibrated accordingly. Part of being an entertainer is being provocative or “incendiary.” That’s all he was saying.
Update: The Plum Line has an extended passage from the show. A taste:
When you send those fundraising requests out, Mr. Steele, make sure you say, we — we — we want Obama to succeed. So people understand your compassion. Republicans, conservatives are sick and tired of being talked down to, sick and tired of being lectured to. And until you show some understanding and respect for who they are, you’re going to have a tough time rebuilding your party.
Update: Matt Lewis has the audio.










Blowback
Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.
Trackbacks/Pings
Trackback URL
Comments
Comment pages: 1 2 3 … 6 Next »
300+
artist on March 2, 2009 at 3:31 PM
Thanks Steele.
blatantblue on March 2, 2009 at 3:32 PM
The media’s going to wet itself at the prospect of a conservative civil war
…….
And that would be Rush vs. who?
artist on March 2, 2009 at 3:32 PM
‘the middle has to be wooed”
Yeah- because that always works so well for us.
ExTex on March 2, 2009 at 3:34 PM
Stop it guys – save it for Obama and the dems.
Mr. Steele – LEAD, FOLLOW or GET THE HELL OUT OF THE WAY
We are coming and we want heads!!!
izoneguy on March 2, 2009 at 3:34 PM
because, again, Steele is NOT the head of the GOP….. just the RNC. If Steele continues his light weight leadership, the conservative cause is damaged. I never liked Steele and never will. He is a traitor , it appears, to the conservative members..
MNDavenotPC on March 2, 2009 at 3:35 PM
yeah
except when he is trashing Limbaugh who has the ear of 22 million people a day
you know … the people who donate money, knock on door and otherwise pour their heart and soul into Republican campaigns
I think Rush’s best point was that conservatives are tired of the beltway folk talking down to us
joey24007 on March 2, 2009 at 3:35 PM
Close the primaries Steele- then you can suck up to people who would shove us in railway cars if they thought they could.
jjshaka on March 2, 2009 at 3:36 PM
Why should Steele and Cantor explain what Limbaugh says? Are the Democrats dragged to explain every insane rant that moonbat commentators spew? Steele and Cantor should have just made it clear that Limbaugh is not a GOP official(no matter what Barry says) and his thoughts are his and no way GOP’s. Why can’t they do that simple thing?
promachus on March 2, 2009 at 3:36 PM
Of course they will. Funny thing, seems you are too. Especially with your headline of this post. Youre as bad as how the liberal media will treat this.
bucsox79 on March 2, 2009 at 3:36 PM
All the more reason why I want to disband Capital Hill.
Require representatives and senators to spend at least 95% of their time in their district/state.
All meetings can be held electronically, as can voting.
MarkTheGreat on March 2, 2009 at 3:36 PM
My best guess is that Rush is trying to toughen Steele up. Steele needs to no be pulled into a “agree with Rush” debate. He needs to explain how he will stengthen the GOP and tell the press to talk to Limbaugh if they want further explanation. I would love to see Rush more on the TV news circuit to see these talking heads get torn to shreads.
WashJeff on March 2, 2009 at 3:36 PM
The msm duped Cantor and Steele.
That is all.
artist on March 2, 2009 at 3:37 PM
I listened to him and yes, Steele got served.
Simply put, you cannot say one thing and then back away from it. The perfect chance to get this together has come and Steele has to take advantage of it. Meaning, change your strategy or another defeat will come.
ProudPalinFan on March 2, 2009 at 3:38 PM
Such a shame about this GOP mess. Oh well.
Looks like trying to figure out how conservative principles will translate into policies will take a back seat while egos fly.
What the conservatives need to realize is that Rush is NOT MSAINSTREAM. His ideas can be.
If people truly start looking at Rush as the head of the GOP then you are in trouble, big time. Too bad it is heading in that direction.
ckoeber on March 2, 2009 at 3:38 PM
I changed my party affiliation to (I) independent today. I also had the RNC remove me from their mailing list.
Disgusted former Republican
OmahaConservative on March 2, 2009 at 3:38 PM
Wow, that sounds so…dare I say it…McCain like. Yeah that’s a winning strategy. Let’s all take a knee for Mr. “non-partisan” /s/
What’s a spineless jellyfish pubbie to do? Keep rubbing your worry beads and hope it blows over? Pick a damned side and plant your flag, you wimps.
Fletch54 on March 2, 2009 at 3:38 PM
Give me a break – who do Cantor and Steele think they are? They are like Montessori kids way over their heads in the what the Dems have sucked them into. Rush Limbaugh is on target and crucial to Conservatives coming back from so many past errors in judgment (Mac Attack – and “reaching across the aisle to my Democrat friends” etc.). I had just sent a check to the RNC and now I’m stopping payment on it…….Steele needs to understand that this country is a stake – this is NOT just a game he’s so dumbly playing…..and Cantor went from Hero to Zero in 2 weeks…
Cinday Blackburn on March 2, 2009 at 3:39 PM
It’s a feud that has been a long time coming and needs to be resolved. Does the party stand for the principles so clearly articulated by Reagan or does it stand for the Democrat-lite principles of rat bastard political traitors like McCain, Collins, and Specter.
Does the GOP want Obama’s agenda to succeed like the McCain wing of traitor’s claim or do they want it to fail as Limbaugh so clearly has stated?
Steele is ill-advised to make this a public fight but, IMO, the base of the GOP is on Limbaugh’s side of this debate. Steele can spend his time at the RNC propping up rat bastard traitors like Specter or he can provide new leadership and vision that calls for smaller government, lower taxes, and all the other hallmarks of conservatism. The choice is Steele’s but he will be sadly disappointed if he opts for finding common cause with the filthy liar’s agenda instead of standing up for the values of the GOP’s base.
highhopes on March 2, 2009 at 3:39 PM
Come on Steele . . . Neville Chamberlain was also open to other viewpoints. Now, get off that crap and get into the fight so we can win some elections.
rplat on March 2, 2009 at 3:39 PM
I think Steele’s comments are being misinterpreted by the media, and Rush’s comments are likely to be misinterpreted as well. Steele was not attacking Rush, he was trying to ‘play nice’ with the liberals. Rush was not declaring war on Steele, but was admonishing him to get tougher and to refocus his priorities. Neither man has said that the other is not a conservative, neither man has challenged the other as a spokesman for our cause. They just disagree about the strategies and tactics we should pursue (and in this, I think Rush is right.)
joe_doufu on March 2, 2009 at 3:39 PM
Steele – call your office – ASAP.
Fuquay Steve on March 2, 2009 at 3:39 PM
Well I never liked Steele or Cantor, and living in DC I know them better than most. So while they are taking on fire, I’m just going to pull out my fiddle.
Between both of those jokes you wouldn’t find one spine. I’ll take the purge any way I can get it.
LevStrauss on March 2, 2009 at 3:39 PM
Right on. Most of the 22 million listeners sat out the election. We are tired of being undermined and ridiculed by the MSM and the Washingtonians who suppose to represent us. The republican party is in shambles and the leadership is not doing much to help it.
No donations from my family, friends, nor me to the RNC. We’re giving it to SarahPAC.
jencab on March 2, 2009 at 3:39 PM
Heard Rush’s take live and it was quite a tour-de-force; I hope you guys post the transcript when his website is updated as he made many great points obviously left out of this article.
He’s not– not the way the media will make it out to be, ie, “Steele attacked me, no one attacks me, I’m fighting back.” He even said he wasn’t planning on talking about it, but he talked about how, ostensibly, the RNC works to defeat the Dem agenda, yet doesn’t have the guts to say, ergo, that they’re working towards their [the Dems] failure? I just think he’s had it with weak-kneed Repubs, and he went nuclear today.
Pasalubong on March 2, 2009 at 3:40 PM
In fairness, they don’t have to worry about people actually listening to them in the first place. Olbermann’s 17 viewers are all on the same page. :-)
amerpundit on March 2, 2009 at 3:40 PM
I’ve said it before and I’ll say it again and again…
I am not loyal to the GOP. I left during Shamnesty. I’m a Conservative, and will remain a Conservative, even at the death of the Republican Party. Make no mistake, I will ONLY support those espousing my principles. GOP be damned.
If we need a new Party, one that will represent US, then that’s where I will go. You’re on notice, Michael Steele.
tickleddragon on March 2, 2009 at 3:40 PM
Mr Steele, you’re making a mistake.
We are coming and we want heads!!!
(thx izoneguy)
JoeAvg on March 2, 2009 at 3:40 PM
I know most of HA readers and commentators are big Rush fans, but seriously, Rush knock it off. I’m tried of Rush excommunicated people who don’t follow him lock and key (Spector well he’s different).
Instead of yapping your mouth behind your protective mic, run for Congress, run for Governor, run for something. It’s easy yell and scream about how everyone is doing it wrong when Rush himself has never actually ran anything in his life expect for his mouth.
Let the bashing of me begin…
Lance Murdock on March 2, 2009 at 3:40 PM
Ask, and ye shall recieve…..how’d you do that BigD?
Rovin on March 2, 2009 at 3:40 PM
Steele needs to STFU and worry about his job, as if he does not have enough to do but mouth off about conservatives. My check remains ripped up and in a frame on my wall as a remembrance the day the party died.
Wade on March 2, 2009 at 3:41 PM
I was listening to Rush’s show and heard it – please do not miss hearing it. He ripped Steele a new one. Steele claimed that “he, himself” is the head of the Republican Party, which he is not – Rush pointed out that he is the head of the RNC and that his job is to change the primary process so democrats don’t pick our candidate again. There was tons more, but it was awesome.
Don’t worry too much about the libs wetting themselves over it because Rush addressed that too. I knew that when they elected Michael Steele, it was a mistake. He’s a pretty boy and is not a conservative.
Be sure to listen to it. Allah, you bug me.
suzyk on March 2, 2009 at 3:41 PM
I watched Steele at some “State of the Black Union” conference on CSPAN. When I saw him give that crook, “Rev.” Al Sharpton a standing ovation for some bullcrap statement he made, that was it. I am so tired of people not standing up to crooks and race hustlers like Sharpton and Jackson. He may be the head of the RNC, but he’s no conservative leader, for sure.
Babino on March 2, 2009 at 3:41 PM
Mr. Steele should have said, when dems apologize for Chrissy Matthews, HuffPo and DailyKos support, and when they apologize for the MoveOn Gen Betrayus and George Soros front groups, then I’d be happy to answer your question (or rather Rahm Emmanuel’s talking points and coordinated questions) on Rush Limbaugh and the conservative movement.
eaglewingz08 on March 2, 2009 at 3:41 PM
Congratulations, OmahaConservative, you’ve done exactly what the liberal reporters who write these stories wanted you to do. Why don’t you go join Hillary’s blog or something?
joe_doufu on March 2, 2009 at 3:42 PM
Because he’s a showman, he’s an entertainer. . . and because if he didn’t take it personally, you wouldn’t be talking about it.
Why does Rush SAY he’s taking this personally? $
ThackerAgency on March 2, 2009 at 3:42 PM
Unless they actually listened to Rush’s speech, or his radio show……
……….. or want the MSM to pick the Republican candiates in the next round of elections.
Seven Percent Solution on March 2, 2009 at 3:42 PM
I watched Rush’s speech and he blew me away. Especially the points about conservatives taking the pary back from those a$$-clown RINO’s and Beltway stooges who want to “change” what we stand for.
Well, if there is an internecine fight for the soul of the Republican-Conservative movement, so be it.
For RINO’s and their ilk, off with their heads (figuratively, yet con mucho gusto).
J.J. Sefton on March 2, 2009 at 3:42 PM
Exit question via Ace: Why is Rush taking this personally? He knows the political game that’s being played here and why Steele, in his leadership role, has to navigate away from hyperpartisan rhetoric.
Right off the top of my head they change the topic in the news cycle to Republicans and their issues. Which also allows both Steele and Limbaugh to hammer The President and his administration on any number of his policy decisions. I mean I would want people out in TV land to be listening to the Republicans stressing their core Principles. I would rather hear it from Michael Steele and Rush Limbaugh ect…then listen to Rahm Emanuel, and others distort perception in the MSM. Isn’t better to have all eyes trained on the Republicans? While they are having discussions about substance, instead of The Democrats discussions about “Style”
Dr Evil on March 2, 2009 at 3:42 PM
Did Nancy Pelosi, Howard Dean, or Harry Reid ever ask themselves if they needed to change their message to appeal to moderates? Hell no. Why should Conservatives including Cantor and Steele change their message to be nice guys?
IMHO, I’m tired of pussy and weak Conservative talking heads, including Michael Steele. Get a spine already and quit backing down.
smartsy on March 2, 2009 at 3:43 PM
You know the answers to these questions, why not just come out and say what we’re all thinking. Limbaugh 100% believes that the GOP runs through him, his little “aside” that the party doesn’t run through him doens’t fool a damn person. What other figure in the Republican party has the ability to cause politicians to utter apologies the *moment* they deign to criticize him. Even Erica Cantor’s supposed “repudiation” of Rush did not mention the guy by name. He gave a self indulgent 90 minute speech at CPAC, by far the longest one and gleefully proclaimed it was his first “address to the nation” yet feigns ignorance when people frame him as the head of the GOP.
Most obviously, how can someone who supposedly isn’t the head of the GOP tell the head of the RNC that he’s NOT the head of the Republican party. Who is Rush? Is there no “head” unless their is a Presidency. Howard Dean certainly didn’t act like anything but the head of the DNC and he was given the respect by Dem operatives and look at what happened in 2006 and again this year. I’ve said it before, and I’ll say it again, next to Obama NO ONE has a cult of personality and blindly loyal, worshipful followering in this country like Rush Limbaugh.
DeathToMediaHacks on March 2, 2009 at 3:43 PM
You be da man, Steele. You be da man.
benny shakar on March 2, 2009 at 3:43 PM
Very disappointed in Steele.
rollthedice on March 2, 2009 at 3:43 PM
Actually Cantor and Steele are dupes. Take Cantor for instance, you know the guy who didn’t vote for the bailout because Pelosi hurt his wittle feewings and not because it was just a flat out horrible bill. We should have no time for that nonsense. Reaching across the aisle is one thing, but just being a mindless, superficial, dolt is one of the things that helped drive this party into the ground. And sorry folks but its the same problem I have with Palin, though she is nowhere near the same league as these bums.
LevStrauss on March 2, 2009 at 3:43 PM
I agree, suzyk. He was spot on what he said about Steele. I expect everyone to at least read the transcript. It is worth a note. He had awesome points!
deidre on March 2, 2009 at 3:44 PM
When talk show hosts ask questions about talk show hosts, Republicans should reply:
1. “The people are worried about their futures being mortgaged to enormous debt and their savings wiped out by rampant inflation when the government has to run the printing presses because they cannot tax enough to pay the debt service. Why are you talking about talk show hosts.”
2. “If you want to talk about what is wrong with talk show hosts, lets talk about you and why you are asking Rahm Emmanual’s talking points for him rather than doing some useful informing of the public about the problems we are facing.”
3. “Why don’t you play his entire speech and ask your viewers if they agree with him.”
4. “I usually don’t get into arguments with talk show hosts but if you keep arguing that this is important, I will make an exception and argue with you.”
KW64 on March 2, 2009 at 3:44 PM
Calling Rush’s comments incendiary and ugly is way out of line. I expect that from the left, not the chairman of the RNC.
JammieWearingFool on March 2, 2009 at 3:44 PM
DTMH, since you’re not a conservative, what qualifies you to psychoanalyze Rush or his listeners?
joe_doufu on March 2, 2009 at 3:44 PM
The boss b*tch-slaps Michael Steele here.
My collie says:
CyberCipher on March 2, 2009 at 3:45 PM
I agree with Rush. Steele needs to spend less time on-camera, and more time on the nuts and bolts of the voting system, etc.
marklmail on March 2, 2009 at 3:45 PM
All Steele had to say was…”Rush leading our party is the lefts creation not ours…he speaks to our Party not for our party.”
tomas on March 2, 2009 at 3:46 PM
How many pro-life Democrats are their in congress? How many pro-gun rights Democrats are their in the house? How many Democrats openly advocate gay marriage? Blue dogs aren’t hypotheticals they were an explicit stratefy by Pelosi, Dean and Emanuel to bring the Democrats back into the south and it has worked. It doesn’t lead to 100% loyalty on all issues, note some house Dems voted against the stimulus. But Democrats majorities have come precisely from their willingness to run moderate conservatives against Bush in 2006 and 2008. No doubt many of them will point out certain votes against Obama in 2010 to show they are loyal to local values first meanwhile making sure the Dem majority is large enough that the GOP is shut out of conference and committees. It’s smart politics, the GOP is fooish for trying to ignore it.
DeathToMediaHacks on March 2, 2009 at 3:46 PM
Besides, who said Rush is taking it personally? I listened to the show and he was criticizing Steele on the way he performs his job, not on his principles or character or any kind of ad hominem attack.
joe_doufu on March 2, 2009 at 3:46 PM
In a nutshell, this is the substance of an e-mail I sent to Michael Steele first thing this morning.
The pandering that went on during the Hughley “show”…a comedian is now a news commentator…and Steele failing to stand up and say, “if you don’t like what Rush is saying, then tell me what about a more effective and much much smaller method of government, a strong national defense, and embracing the values of our founding fathers you truly find offensive?”
That, Mr. Steele is leadership…backing down and apologizing for an American standing up and voicing these principles is not leadership…nor demonstrating conviction.
coldwarrior on March 2, 2009 at 3:46 PM
No, they just lied through their noses according to Kanjorski. And Obama, you’ll recall, talked up cutting the deficit, tax cuts for everyone, opposition to gay marriage, and other typically-conservative positions. He never had any intention of keeping most of them, but he did send a different message than, say, John Kerry.
amerpundit on March 2, 2009 at 3:46 PM
Steele, Cantor, and others in the GOP need to deal with this one of two ways:
1) Refuse to comment on Rush when asked. No need to be defensive or condescending. Just simply tell the reporter or journalist to direct any questions about his remarks to Rush himself. Perfectly reasonable response.
2) Explain the context of Rush’s remarks. He was pretty clear that he wanted Obama to fail if his policies were big government and socialist. Well, it’s pretty obvious Obama is no pragmatist or centrist. Also, throw it back in the media’s face that none of them and no one in the Dem party(except for Lieberman who was thrown out) supported Bush during virtually his entire time in office.
Doughboy on March 2, 2009 at 3:47 PM
a dolt would be somebody making the democrat-liberal claim of 1,000,000 casualties in Iraq at CPAC
that dolt is Ron Paul
joey24007 on March 2, 2009 at 3:47 PM
*grabs popcorn*
benny shakar on March 2, 2009 at 3:47 PM
They are not “forced”: they take the bait. Are they too slow to turn the question around?:
“Barack Obama is a socialist, [questioner]. Even leaders of socialist countries like Russia urge America not to do what they did. Do you want America to be a socialist country, when even socialists say ‘Don’t go there’?”
“Barack Obama wants to send this country trillions of dollars deeper in debt. Do you support bankrupting the country, [questioner]?”
“You don’t want America to be a bankrupt socialist country? Then you hope Obama fails, too, right?”
This is not rocket science.
__________
RJGatorEsq. on March 2, 2009 at 3:47 PM
Meanwhile
The Dow is -303.
Distraction?
artist on March 2, 2009 at 3:47 PM
The same authority that qualifies conservatives to psychoanalyze Nancy Pelosi, Obama or Clinton I suppose.
DeathToMediaHacks on March 2, 2009 at 3:48 PM
Two-and-a-half words: Ratings & ego.
calbear on March 2, 2009 at 3:48 PM
Newt Gingrich just made a great point. The Democrats are the party of Bill Ayers.
JammieWearingFool on March 2, 2009 at 3:48 PM
Allahpundit, if you had any guts, you would have included Rush’s piece de resistance, which was to suggest to Steele that he include in his next fundraising letter all the reasons he wanted Obama to “succeed.”
Is it really so hard for the Repubs to say they want Obama’s policies to fail? If it is, they deserve to lose, and you can’t blame Rush.
BigD on March 2, 2009 at 3:48 PM
You accuse most of us at HA of liking Rush. You betcha. He tells the truth. We know he is only right 98.6% of the time, but we’d rather live with Rush’s batting average than Obama being right 100% in his implementation of socialism.
technopeasant on March 2, 2009 at 3:48 PM
As an owner of Montessori school and the parent of children educated in that school – I hope you will explain this comment?
jake-the-goose on March 2, 2009 at 3:48 PM
I agree that DTMH has no right to psychoanalyze Rush…
But what gives you the right to insult Conservatives for leaving a party that doesn’t represent them?
tickleddragon on March 2, 2009 at 3:48 PM
Why is it so hard for Steele and Cantor to clearly say that we don’t want the country to fail so that is why we don’t want Obama to succeed in getting his agenda passed because it is bad for the country? Why is this so hard?
Mark1971 on March 2, 2009 at 3:49 PM
*Pours a beer, turns up the volume*
DeathToMediaHacks on March 2, 2009 at 3:49 PM
What are you going to wash that down with?
Be_Aware on March 2, 2009 at 3:49 PM
I like Rush, but I do cringe occasionally at some of his satire that can border on cruel; in that sense, he is an entertainer. It may be funny and he may be saying the thing that you are thinking but can’t say, but Steele wisely needs to not embrace everything Rush says that is meant to be provocative.
deedledee on March 2, 2009 at 3:49 PM
Part of being an entertainer is being provocative or “incendiary.” That’s all he was saying.
NO IT IS NOT! Those adjectives also mean you are to be dismissed as not serious…nothing is further from the truth…entertainers are to be enjoyed and forgotten…Rush says it the way the country feels it…Playing nice got us in this mess…it’s for p**sies…loser p**sies
winston on March 2, 2009 at 3:49 PM
++1000 =)
canditaylor68 on March 2, 2009 at 3:49 PM
A landslide 365-173 electoral college victory last November seems to suggest otherwise.
benny shakar on March 2, 2009 at 3:49 PM
Mike Allen at Politico was just on Fox and saying (paraphrasing), “This is not good for the Republican Party to follow Rush’s “leadership/commentary”. What Allen’s failing to understand is 90% of what Rush said at CPAC should be coming from our Republican “leaders”, and it’s not the case. Does something Rush says, (if its a true conservative principal) have less credibility than the rhetorical crap the liberal morons running this country into the ground?
Rovin on March 2, 2009 at 3:49 PM
Agreed.
Does Steele not have enough to do, that he feels his time is best spent attacking our own side?
I was pleased with the selection of Steele. I am SO over that now.
__________
RJGatorEsq. on March 2, 2009 at 3:50 PM
Wrong – Wrong – Wrong
Rush went out of his way to defend Steele on many occasions.
Steele just FLAT OUT fuc-ed up here – now way around it.
He owes Rush a private phone call.
And I do mean private.
jake-the-goose on March 2, 2009 at 3:50 PM
How much is Sarah paying you? Or do you just spend your time in between writing Weekly Standard columns scouring the internet for any instance of Palin.
The only thing more pathetic than following me around the internet…is…well…following you around the internet.
LevStrauss on March 2, 2009 at 3:51 PM
Tried to warn folks, people close to D.C. and MD know Michael Steele as a do-nothing, low talent buffoon who couldn’t hack it against more talented people in the Democrats and became a Republican because his race made him a bit of a rarety. He then did zip, zero, as Lieutenant Governor of the state and ran an atrocious senate campaign. The guy has, and always will be, an embarassment and he’s the head of the RNC. HA! Good luck.
DeathToMediaHacks on March 2, 2009 at 3:51 PM
I sent this letter to Steele over the weekend.
genso on March 2, 2009 at 3:51 PM
Dow under 7000, Dear Leader is about to massively expand government, and the Republicans are having a pissing contest?
Dear Leader has successfully made Rush the issue, and not His policies.
rbj on March 2, 2009 at 3:52 PM
Well this sure drops my support of Steele by, oh say 90%. I thought he was smart.
tarpon on March 2, 2009 at 3:52 PM
I’m a big Rush fan and Steele better learn a few things.
1. When you make a statement about Rush make sure you know what you are talking about.
2. Whatever you attribute to Rush you are saying about his fan base, in effect Steele just called everyone that agrees with Rush “Ugly”
3. This is supposed to get me to donate and support the republican party???
lanesmerge on March 2, 2009 at 3:52 PM
Allah, I love you, man, but how is “I want him to fail”, “incendiary”? We all know what he meant. And if we pull the, “well, the tone could’ve been nicer” card, we fall into the slippery slope of kowtowing to “correct” speech. Please. It’s not hard to explain to “moderates” what our beliefs are, why they’re better for society, and why we want Obama’s to fail. For Steele to call that “incendiary” while he’s been hired to make sure the Democrats fail, is what’s making all of us– boss included– bang our heads against the wall.
Pasalubong on March 2, 2009 at 3:52 PM
i’m from france, and that in itself says a lot, and i find there is nothing wrong with what Limbaugh said at CPAC, actually it’s a whole lot of common sense… the problem with politician on the Right everywhere is that they’re always on the defensive, it’s almost as if they feel guilty or something…
R.Limbaugh speech was nor offensive, nor ugly, it wasn’t even entertainment, it’s just what the principle on the right is and should be, no wonder he is a success, he connects with people on the Right, politicians on the Right keeps failing to do so… it’s a freaking nightmare.
Obama’s policies is going to wreck the USA and the rest of the world will follow, i want him to Fail (with a big F).
sun on March 2, 2009 at 3:52 PM
I’m not sure any of them will be effective until you have another person stand up and take the help as the chief spokesperson for the RNC.
I must admit, Rush is one of the few, perhaps ONLY, person who actually is trying to lay down strategy and explicitly offer different policies, etc. publically.
Everyone else seems to be just throwing rocks from the sidelines.
ckoeber on March 2, 2009 at 3:53 PM
I don’t know. Rush was killin’ em this afternoon; I have to be off the board by about 4:30. I figured I might as well ask.
BigD on March 2, 2009 at 3:53 PM
Steele and Cantor trying to suck up to the msm by disparaging Rush is a big mistake. If they want to be more like democrats just change your party affiliation.
apoole on March 2, 2009 at 3:53 PM
xit question via Ace: Why is Rush taking this personally? He knows the political game that’s being played here and why Steele, in his leadership role, has to navigate away from hyper partisan rhetoric.
Ratings? Rush Limbaugh has an audience, and we are in the middle of the Obama Media Love Affair. Would the Media pay attention if Rush and Steele were kissy face? I have a feeling this is about Rush manipulating the MSM. It isn’t like he doesn’t know how:) The ending should result in raising donations for the Republican Party…..just sayin don’t bother if it is just for the exercise GUYS, the Dow’s dropping like a prom queen’s skirt on prom night!
Dr Evil on March 2, 2009 at 3:53 PM
Steele is an empty suit, a BOZO. He can’t lead jack. We need to replace him pronto, with a a conservative as devout to our principles as the socialists are to theirs and some plasma hot fire in his gut.
dogsoldier on March 2, 2009 at 3:53 PM
I think Rush really think he speaks for all the conservative movement. But doing so he makes Steele’s life harder in a difficult moment for the GOP. I rather have the republicans in Congress oppose Obama’s plans and coming with alternative initiatives than trying to explain that Rush is not the party leader.
clemycali on March 2, 2009 at 3:53 PM
And another thing…my phone rings every night and the ID says RNC…I haven’t answered in months and will not start now…Rush made that point too…entertaining isn’t it???
winston on March 2, 2009 at 3:53 PM
Neither Rush nor Steele is “leader of the GOP”.
Rush is leader of the Conservative Movement. He was named that by none other than Ronald Reagan in 1993. Noone since has come close to challenge him from that position.
Steele is leader of the RNC. Although in recent weeks it appears that he is not the right man for the job.
Obama has framed himself as anything but “Mr. Nonpartisan”, but more like “Mr. Hyperpartisan”. That became clear after he named Rahm Emmanuel as his chief-of-staff, and had just been even more crystal clear in the months since.
Norwegian on March 2, 2009 at 3:54 PM
There is no civil war. The full context of what Rush was saying is that the sleeping giant has awakened. The Conservative Movement is now going to focus on the second word, movement, and it’s up to Republicans if they fall in line or not. A force of nature has been unleashed and the Left is about to get hammered.
Strength and honor.
EMD on March 2, 2009 at 3:54 PM
joe_doufu on March 2, 2009 at 3:42 PM
Kiss my arse, Rino.
OmahaConservative on March 2, 2009 at 3:54 PM
Glad to see Newt didn’t abandon Rush especially after making the movie about Reagan.
Again Sean is not stupid. He hasn’t mentioned Michael Steele once. May this teach him a lesson. Never endorse anybody. It’s too easy to get burned. Let the universe unfold naturally.
technopeasant on March 2, 2009 at 3:54 PM
STOP PANDERING TO THE BLACKS. Say what WE mean.
marklmail on March 2, 2009 at 3:54 PM
Comment pages: 1 2 3 … 6 Next »