CNN: Limbaugh’s angry, sinister speech “crossed a line”
posted at 12:32 pm on March 1, 2009 by Allahpundit
I haven’t had time to watch the speech but doubtless those who have will have plenty to say in response in the comments. I did see that Rush revisited his point about wanting The One to fail, which gives the media ample excuse to run with it, sans context, for another week. Stephanopoulos used it to make Cantor squirm on “This Week” this morning and Rahm Emanuel took full advantage by painting the GOP as a wholly-owned subsidiary of Rush Inc. All part of the strategy to make the party’s approval rating among independents look like Limbaugh’s does.
Blowback
Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.
Trackbacks/Pings
Trackback URL
Comments
Comment pages: « Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 Next »
Meanwhile the Shepard is shooting his dogs, and the wolves are entering the clearing!
conservnut on March 1, 2009 at 2:07 PM
ROTFLMAO…. I’m 48, never been married and even I know that….
doriangrey on March 1, 2009 at 2:08 PM
Every time the media does this, Rush’s listenership goes up!
joe_doufu on March 1, 2009 at 2:08 PM
Get your lips off Allahpundit’s backside. He hasn’t any use for you, either.
Blake on March 1, 2009 at 2:09 PM
I’ve voted straight republican tickets ever since I registered to vote for Reagan.
I hope Huck’s not “our” guy, I might have to waste my vote on a third party candidate. Something about him, don’t think I could bring myself to vote for him
husker3000 on March 1, 2009 at 2:11 PM
Bishop, I have been married to the same lady for thirty nine years. Many times she has emerged from a department store dressing room and I give the thumbs down signal.
Pelayo on March 1, 2009 at 2:11 PM
That’s my theory too, rockmom. Behavior of the new regime has Rahm’s fingerprints all over it.
My bet for #2 in command is Axelrod. Yours?
petefrt on March 1, 2009 at 2:12 PM
I think the military will figure more prominently in our lives than we’ve seen before.
JiangxiDad on March 1, 2009 at 2:12 PM
If I didn’t know better, I’d think you were sneering at me for not agreeing with you.
Nope, you’re just being outright insulting. Again, you’re a hypocrite.
MadisonConservative on March 1, 2009 at 2:13 PM
Rahm Emmanuel? Emmanuel is to Obama as Segal was to Lansky.
Pelayo on March 1, 2009 at 2:15 PM
Scary thought, but you may be right.
conservnut on March 1, 2009 at 2:15 PM
Do you afford the same reasoning to Congress if they don’t read bills they vote upon?
Wade on March 1, 2009 at 2:15 PM
If that’s the case, so will the militia.
MadisonConservative on March 1, 2009 at 2:16 PM
We will hold on, we will get through
We will not abandon the Red and White and Blue
I don’t know how I don’t know when
But we will see our home reborn again
Hold on til then, oh wait and see!
Someday again we will be free!
PercyB on March 1, 2009 at 2:16 PM
Wow. More than thirty years ago, I went with my girlfriend (now my wife) to buy a pair of shoes for her. They were blue. When we got back to the car, I must have said something about not wanting to talk about the shoes anymore, and she burst out into tears. I was stunned, and didn’t know what to do. I didn’t know about happiness and clothing.
Slowly, I learned to read her face. Now I love what makes her happy. It’s such a small thing.
JiangxiDad on March 1, 2009 at 2:17 PM
Heh, what are you smoking? You don’t give a clue to anything I said that’s even remotely connected to anything in your post.
Earth calling Kokonet… come in… come in…
petefrt on March 1, 2009 at 2:17 PM
If I haven’t said so before, great poems–and so quickly!
JiangxiDad on March 1, 2009 at 2:18 PM
-
To be just a hair more specific… Our current Secretary of State is no doubt a laughing stock before, during (text messages during), and after meetings with foreign heads of state et al. Why… She publicly (world wide coverage for years it seemed) defended her lecherous husband (at the time, our President) while he (the smartest man ever (Rhode Scholar… Ha!)) left evidence on the dress of a woman half his age (she tricked him no doubt) and then committed perjury so as to drag him, Hillary, and the American people through one of the countries lowest points in my life time. Scum is insulted when we refer to the Clintons as scum (so please don’t). But the Democrats love them…
-
Just one example of the awesome team that Obama put together for us.
RalphyBoy on March 1, 2009 at 2:18 PM
Did President Bush ever once direct a comment to Randi Rhodes or Al Franken? I don’t remember it, if he did.
These guys can’t stand being criticized by private citizens. That says something, and it isn’t good.
capitalist piglet on March 1, 2009 at 2:21 PM
No, of course not. Is it an analogous situation in your mind?
DarkCurrent on March 1, 2009 at 2:22 PM
-
Then again… they can be put on defense easily because of that too… Just thinking out loud here. Now where is that spray paint?
RalphyBoy on March 1, 2009 at 2:25 PM
This Bill Schneider was a flat out cheerleader for Obama during the campaign so in a speech that nails democrats to the wall he is bound to be upset and talk about an angry tone. Others would call it passionate but that term isn’t reserved for Conservatives especially Rush. It was completely unnecessary in his anaylsis to frame Rush as the leader of the angry “white man vote” in 1994. He tries to change the subject completely. Does anyone think that he would phrase Obama or the Democrats as the “Angry Minority vote”? Would he phrase THEIR victories in derogatory terms? Did he mentioned the joke about Biden’s racist comments? Did he mention Biden’s stupid “we will keep the bridge open comment”? No, he never addresses Rush’s points where he nails Democrats instead he fills the CNN audience with anti-Rush propaganda. What an a$$!!! Why isn’t ever pointed out that he Borger are Democrats instead of political analysts?
Conan on March 1, 2009 at 2:26 PM
John Podesta. Axelrod is their Goebbels, the minister of propaganda, but Emanuel and Podesta are the brains of the operation. They’ve had this coup planned since the day Bill Clinton left office. Barack Obama was a convenient front man for them. The really scary part is that Barack Obama actually believes he is president.
rockmom on March 1, 2009 at 2:27 PM
People were asking what good the tea parties will do. This is part of the answer.
I think a very public display of displeasure with Obama is not only helpful, but necessary – no more punching a chad in a voting booth and keeping our mouths shut in public. This guy doesn’t like us telling him what we think, which is one very good reason why we should do it, and loudly.
capitalist piglet on March 1, 2009 at 2:29 PM
“Obama… Spending your money, so you don’t have to.”
RalphyBoy on March 1, 2009 at 2:30 PM
Here,..a bit off topic but it should make you feel better. This attitude is what made America great. http://www.nytimes.com/2009/03/01/sports/baseball/01maine.html?_r=2&ref=sports
a capella on March 1, 2009 at 2:30 PM
Limbaugh is going to feast on Rahm’s fetid little heart tomorrow.
Jim Treacher on March 1, 2009 at 2:32 PM
-
Zing! We have a winner.
RalphyBoy on March 1, 2009 at 2:32 PM
Limbaugh is puffing on a cigar somewhere and snickering.
DrStock on March 1, 2009 at 2:33 PM
lol, you guyz shud appreciate the Creator of Worlds more.
He’s one of the diminishing brain trust that you have left.
A lot of the conservative intelligentsia jumped ship at the last port, and you and Erick Erickksen seem to be intent on keelhauling the rest.
I should have apppreciated him more when we were friends.
Are we frenemies now?
perhaps…
strangelet on March 1, 2009 at 2:34 PM
Heh, does anyone else see the irony that Chicken Noodle Network probably had its best ratings evah when it ran Rush’s speech?
“Angry”? “Sinister”? What is that pundit smoking? I wonder if he even watched it, only relying on a second-hand critique.
onlineanalyst on March 1, 2009 at 2:34 PM
By the way, Rush didn’t seem angry to me at all – unless he was talking about things like the way the Left tears people at the top down, instead of building people on the bottom up.
And he’s 100% correct about that. It also needs to be said.
What anger he expressed was righteous, I thought. And mostly, his speech was very uplifting. I don’t think we should allow the Left to frame what he said, so if you haven’t watched it, please do so you can discuss it from a position of knowledge.
capitalist piglet on March 1, 2009 at 2:34 PM
All Shcnieder did was show why CNN is irrelevant and Limbaugh is. That was no angry speech. Yeah there was criticism, but it was done with humor and grace.
And what’s really great, is that it helps to shine a spotlight on Obama’s policies.
Iblis on March 1, 2009 at 2:36 PM
You know, I go to Real Clear Politics, I read stuff from the NYT, the LAT, Politico, I watch Cspan, I get a lot of info here at HA, and I still find that the most articulate, valuable information I get is from Rush Limbaugh. I resent libs who try to paint FOX news and Limbaugh as liars- you can go to the source, you can read transcripts of speeches, you do have to appreciate the politics of whoever is imparting the information, but in this day and age there is no excuse for ACCEPTING anything other than actual fact. Everything else is opinion and we’re all entitled to one, but I’m finding more and more that I have no interest in hearing “pundits” give me their opinion. I want the facts, and I get them from Rush Limbaugh.
anniekc on March 1, 2009 at 2:37 PM
Amen Brother! From page 1 of the comments. And it won’t be just the democrats! Stay strong!
Mr_Magoo on March 1, 2009 at 2:37 PM
What a shame that Rush’s speech went right over the head of Bill Schneider’s head. His only analysis of the speech was based on feelings rather than looking at the substance of what was said. I too HOPE that Obama fails with his plans on turning this country into one giant welfare state. Rush was spot on in what he said and it came at the right moment for the Conservative movement. We all need to look to the best among us on a local level to champion the spirit of the constitution. Well done rush and well done to CNN for once again illustrating why they are so out of touch with America.
fazoolius on March 1, 2009 at 2:37 PM
They hear “Limbaugh” and their minds immediately close. That’s because this characterization of him as a “hater” was begun many years ago. They went on a campaign against him, but they couldn’t ruin him…so they’re going to try again.
capitalist piglet on March 1, 2009 at 2:38 PM
Limbaugh is puffing on a cigar somewhere and snickering.
DrStock on March 1, 2009 at 2:33 PM
You betcha he is!
anniekc on March 1, 2009 at 2:38 PM
Sweet. Self-reliance=self-respect.
JiangxiDad on March 1, 2009 at 2:39 PM
I read somewhere that Rush Limbaugh is a homosexual, and that he secretly cruises the public toliets for gay sex. I guess that makes him a “Larry Craig” Republican.
I’m a Ronald Reagan Republican.
Atlanta Voter on March 1, 2009 at 2:40 PM
Oh, BTW, you can totally see CNN’s slant if you watch the little comment box in the bottom left. Rush said, “We hate to see capitalism insulted, I mean, assulted.” The CNN thing stuck with insulted, even though Rush corrected himself. They were not paying attention and they tried hard to pick things out that sounded bad.
PastorJon on March 1, 2009 at 2:40 PM
Bishop, I have been married to the same lady for thirty nine years. Many times she has emerged from a department store dressing room and I give the thumbs down signal.
Pelayo on March 1, 2009 at 2:11 PM
As have I on the thumbs down signal, but with the caveat “It just doesn’t compliment your awesome figure honey” rather than “You look like a frumpy cow in that thing.”
I’m a guy, I’m supposed to be a coarse jerkwad, but I’m just cognizant enough to feel Death’s cold presence surrounding me as I consider my response to “Does this dress make me look fat?”
Bishop on March 1, 2009 at 2:42 PM
Troll quality is way down. Where’s Drywall?
a capella on March 1, 2009 at 2:42 PM
JiangxiDad on March 1, 2009 at 2:42 PM
Schneider has been a cheerleader for Democrats and liberals for twenty years. In the 90s he cranked out a decent article about ‘The Class of ’74′–which lionized the many far-left Demos who took over Congressional seats which had been Republican for a generation. It was like 1964, only worse in some ways.
Nixon and Watergate took a lot of good men down, and some of those seats ( in blue states ) are still held by
The best known of this group is George Miller of Kallyfornia, but the House leadership is rotten with them. Schneider is worthless in analyzing Demos because of his man-crush on them all, and worthless in analyzing Republicans because they’re Those Who Must Be Defeated.
Janos Hunyadi on March 1, 2009 at 2:43 PM
Atlanta Voter on March 1, 2009 at 2:40 PM
Dude, you are clever. CLE-VER. Have you thought about taking it on the road, maybe a stint in Vegas?
Untapped talent? You have it in spades.
Am I still allowed to say “spades?”
Bishop on March 1, 2009 at 2:44 PM
Somehow I was overlooking Podesta. Yep, as soon as you said Podesta, I knew it was right. Podesta is #2 in command, after #1 Rahm Emmanuel, and Axelrod is their Goebbels.
petefrt on March 1, 2009 at 2:47 PM
No, what you are is a typical brain dead liberal troll.
doriangrey on March 1, 2009 at 2:48 PM
Exactly my point in another way piglet. Schneider had to go back and frame the argument as the voice of “angry white men” from 1994. That pkrase is a democrat talking point NOT a point made by a neutral analyst. It is used to demonize the speaker from the right. He had no business other than to try and ruin Rush as you say with the CNN audience. It is intresting that they never analyze Rush as anything but as an extremist with extreme ideas. They really can’t afford to let him be heard because then they would make up their own minds.
Conan on March 1, 2009 at 2:48 PM
Craig or Limbaugh would squeeze your head until it popped, troll–if you ever had to nerve to spew your garbage to them in person
Crawl back to HuffPo–you’re One of Them
Janos Hunyadi on March 1, 2009 at 2:49 PM
Your answer: “No, not at all. It’s more due to your hips and butt that you look fat.”
MadisonConservative on March 1, 2009 at 2:50 PM
Gee, Rush gave a speech that pointed out everything that liberals fear and the libs predictably got their frilly little panties in a twist.
How utterly, utterly shocking.
hachiban on March 1, 2009 at 2:51 PM
Name five examples of “material” and how the Dhimms will have a “field day” with each.
Popping the corn now.
ex-Democrat on March 1, 2009 at 2:51 PM
Whoops, too angry!
Jim Treacher on March 1, 2009 at 2:52 PM
Emanuel still thinks Limbaugh is responsible for the Republican takeover of the House in 1994 and the takedown of Hillarycare and Clinton’s gun control bill – his two favorite policy obsessions. He has had an unnatural obsession with taking down Limbaugh ever since.
Don’t forget that the Clinton years started out almost as radical as this Administration has. That’s no accident. Bill Clinton was not a left-wing ideologue, but his wife was and Rahm Emanuel certainly is. They overreached in their first two years and got their asses handed to them in 1994. Rahm is running the same playbook this time, only he thinks that if he can silence Limbaugh he will get away with it this time around.
Limbaugh’s most important comment yesterday was when he said “this Administration’s agenda is not new, it is not Change, and it is not Hope.” This was direct shot across Rahm’s bow. Limbaugh knows what is really going on here. Obama’s agenda is nothing but the recycled leftist garbage that Emanuel tried to peddle under Bill Clinton.
rockmom on March 1, 2009 at 2:53 PM
Liar…
RalphyBoy on March 1, 2009 at 2:54 PM
Janos Hunyadi on March 1, 2009 at 2:43 PM
I couldn’t even watch him and Gloria Borger and then they would get on at the same time and qithout fail say Obama is so smart he is doing this and this right and then analyzr Republicans and say well they are going to fail because they can’t…fill in the blank.
It is ridiculous it isn’t even informative it is just democrat cheerleading wrapped up as concerned analysis.
Conan on March 1, 2009 at 2:54 PM
I think they may be waiting for a post on that new global thingy the one is wanting to push.
Be_Aware on March 1, 2009 at 2:54 PM
I don’t mind trolls, but Atlanta Voter is not a very good one.
DrStock on March 1, 2009 at 2:54 PM
CNN’s take is the perfect example of why major media shouldn’t be trusted even if our lives depended on it. I posted here that Rush is the gold standard.
That spinmeister Emanuel was out immediately tells me that they know Rush was effective in communicating the conservative message.
LFRGary on March 1, 2009 at 2:55 PM
By field day Atlanta loony obviously means running around like chickens with their heads cut off trying to figure out how to silence Rush before America’s
unwashedbrainwashed masses hear what he is saying.doriangrey on March 1, 2009 at 2:55 PM
Are you kidding? Rham Emmual has been all over the Sunday talk shows lampooning Rush’s insane rant. Look for Obama to get a bump in the polls.
Atlanta Voter on March 1, 2009 at 2:55 PM
be incluuuusive.
DrStock on March 1, 2009 at 2:56 PM
LOL,…I love how Rush has the left going loopy the minute he opens his mouth!!
GO RUSH!!
U.S.A-U.S.A-U.S.A-!!!
christene on March 1, 2009 at 2:56 PM
Presumably you’re such a fan of his that you’re planning to learn how to spell his name.
Jim Treacher on March 1, 2009 at 2:56 PM
Except Bill Clinton only won 43% of the vote. Obama won 53% of the vote, which is a mandate. (Reagan won 51% in 1980.)
Atlanta Voter on March 1, 2009 at 2:59 PM
The same global warming that is about to drop 10 to 14 inches of snow on NY in the next 24 hours????
doriangrey on March 1, 2009 at 2:59 PM
Rush losing 50 pounds would do more for the conservative movement than all the stale “I’m more popular than Reagan” spiels. Think about it. If lefty pundits couldn’t call Rush fat, they might actually have to analyze what hes saying.
Speedwagon82 on March 1, 2009 at 3:01 PM
No, that New Global Economic Deal.
Be_Aware on March 1, 2009 at 3:02 PM
capitalist piglet/hachiban ’12
donnak on March 1, 2009 at 3:02 PM
Especially the CNN poll…
RalphyBoy on March 1, 2009 at 3:02 PM
NAA they would say he has AIDS or is back on the dope or something! You are trying to give the lefties to much credit.
Bicyea on March 1, 2009 at 3:03 PM
Yes, both are jobs in which they are paid. Do you get paid for doing half your job? Nevermind, from your handle it appears you are in school… EOD
Wade on March 1, 2009 at 3:04 PM
Rahm Emanuel is 5’3″. Joseph Goebbels was 5’3″. Coincidence?
InkyBinkyBarleyBoo on March 1, 2009 at 3:04 PM
CNN caught faking the news AGAIN:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YumfuMNM08c
christene on March 1, 2009 at 3:04 PM
Nancy Pelosi is the real leader of the Democratic Party, She writes the bills and Obama is stuck with them. It is a tradgedy that the real source of decisions about the future of America are in the hands of this woman who seems to be utterly clueless about business, economics, markets and what really creates wealth in a country.
The election of 2010 is not against Obama, it is against the radical left Congress. We need to make Pelosi and Reid the face of the opponents; not Obama. 2012 can wait.
KW64 on March 1, 2009 at 3:05 PM
Sure……….
Jindal is skinny; Romney ain’t fat; Rudy, Fred…………..
Try to get your level of analysis above Middle School
Here’s one for ya: Newt was getting a bit pudgy in 94 when he was taking on Clinton–and getting torn apart by the Usual Suspects in the media. Newt DID lose weight, so of course the media totally changed their approach and began treating him fairly and with respect…….
Janos Hunyadi on March 1, 2009 at 3:07 PM
Does Atlanta have lots of pretty, shiny knobs and alphabet blocks in their voting booths now?
hillbillyjim on March 1, 2009 at 3:08 PM
Atlanta Voter since you are living in an obama Twilight Zone let me tell you something. Obama voters don’t really follow politics. They don’t really follow issues. If you were on the right you would know that Nancy Pelosi for instance can say on the Sunday talk shows that she is going to “save the planet” and Obama voters didn’t even know she said it. There are other examples but you are not going to convince people here that the drones on the left are high information voters. See howobamagotelected.com for details.
Conan on March 1, 2009 at 3:08 PM
Treacher to Rush: What’s for lunch today, Rush?
Rush to Treacher: Well, Treacher, how about we have a large bowl of cream of Emanuel soup, maybe with a Schneider salad on the side?
petefrt on March 1, 2009 at 3:10 PM
I heard Geraldo spouting that same crap about the guns and Mexico the other day on FOX. Morons.
Bicyea on March 1, 2009 at 3:10 PM
It’s called an obsession. And he isn’t lampooning anything, he is in dead earnest because he himself has given Limbaugh more power than he deserves. He thinks Limbaugh derailed he previous attempt to remake America and he’s trying to make sure it doesn’t happen again. He’s going to have the same amount of success this time around.
Your failure to see this as a psychotic obsession by Rahm Emanuel will be your downfall, not ours.
rockmom on March 1, 2009 at 3:11 PM
Sounds like first hand knowledge. Tell me, does he at least extend you the courtesy of a reach around?
conservnut on March 1, 2009 at 3:12 PM
So why is Rahm such a sore winner? Why the obsession with Rush Limbaugh?
rockmom on March 1, 2009 at 3:12 PM
So millions of uninformed, one time, racist voters, and yes I said racist, can vote for the “Messiah”, and somehow that equates to a mandate?
Come towards the light……….
donnak on March 1, 2009 at 3:12 PM
Am I the only one who half expects her to say, “Dance Pool Boy”!
Bicyea on March 1, 2009 at 3:13 PM
-
Continually Nincompoopy Network at it again… Awesome link!
RalphyBoy on March 1, 2009 at 3:14 PM
Schneider is a pathetic old hack whose image makes babies cry when they see him on TV.
Never met a person who gives a rip about what Schneider thinks – well, other than CNN and here on HotAir now apparently.
TheMightyQuinn on March 1, 2009 at 3:14 PM
A line from the boot camp scene in “Full Metal Jacket” I like it.
Conan on March 1, 2009 at 3:24 PM
You pay for Congress to conduct your business as a US taxpayer (I presume), but how much do you pay for AllahP? Are you in his management chain? Do you pay a cent to read his daily posts on HA? Perhaps he needed to drive his elderly aunt to the hospital. Do you know?
Btw, how you got “it appears you are in school” from my “handle” is unclear. I suspect you don’t score very well on IQ tests. Am I wrong?
DarkCurrent on March 1, 2009 at 3:24 PM
I hope that a lot of Liberals tune in because they want to see how “angry” Rush’s speech was…maybe we can peel a few of them off the O teat…
CCRWM on March 1, 2009 at 3:32 PM
This is more of what we need….say what you mean, mean what you say.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VsqIQmQsUGQ&eurl
shomegirl on March 1, 2009 at 3:33 PM
CNN….spinning…spinning…spinning. And, playing the race card. Obviously he didn’t listen to Rush’s speech or he couldn’t make the comments he did. But, we know that the Democrats are scared because of Rush’s speech or they would just ignore it…rather than calling it “angry” and trying to spin it. However, most CNN watchers didn’t see it for themselves, so they’ll probably believe this garbage.
njpat on March 1, 2009 at 3:36 PM
It sounds like this guy knows a thing or two about knobs in booths.
Jim Treacher on March 1, 2009 at 3:38 PM
I saw Rush’s speech live and he came nowhere near “crossing a line.” When liberals say that about a speech a conservative has given it just means the conservative knocked it out of the park. And I’m here to tell you RUSH KNOCKED IT OUT OF THE PARK. All I could think while I was watching was “Limbaugh 2012.” Way to go, Rush.
Lizzy on March 1, 2009 at 3:40 PM
Yeah well, attempting to appeal to Independents really worked for us in the last election. That said, personally I think that even Independents want people to stand for something. And the Rinos and many of the Gop have not been able to do that for years. Maybe it was the fact that Obama at least appeared to stand for something that drew Independents to him?
Deanna on March 1, 2009 at 3:43 PM
Did these idiots at cnn not listen to the speech? Angry? He talked about living happy. That conservatives are always happy! What the heck were they listening to?
youngO on March 1, 2009 at 3:46 PM
What’s really frightening is that some huge number, like over 70% of the country, actually approve of Bambi’s shenanigans! With the help of Rush, somehow we’ve got to convince these people that they are IDIOTS.
I’m not embarrassed to have Rush Limbaugh as my conservative leader. He deserves it.
DoctorFeelGood on March 1, 2009 at 3:47 PM
FAR from a Rush ‘Fanboi’ am I, but other than a few personality related things that detracted from his message, His speech is the best socio-political speech I have heard since MLK’s “I Have a Dream” speech.
Anyone who says it was angry, sinister or anything less than the pure truth about real conservativism either didn’t listen to more than a few soundbites taken out of context, or is just a flat out liar. (or both)
But like others said above: Most of the nation will not judge for themselves. They will take the leftist talking heads propaganda as
gospelif it were fact.LegendHasIt on March 1, 2009 at 3:47 PM
You’re right!
What we need are more R’s who’ll go on TV and say exactly that:
Schneider: Rush crossed the line.
Republican: You’re just saying that because he knocked it out of the park and you know it.
This I (and millions of others) would love to see!
INC on March 1, 2009 at 3:48 PM
Comment pages: « Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 Next »