<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Video: The great Star Trek debate</title>
	<atom:link href="http://hotair.com/archives/2009/02/28/video-the-great-star-trek-debate/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/02/28/video-the-great-star-trek-debate/</link>
	<description>The world’s first, full-service conservative Internet broadcast network</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 30 May 2012 19:06:43 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: CPAC: The Star Trek Debate &#124; Christopher Howell</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/02/28/video-the-great-star-trek-debate/comment-page-1/#comment-1934039</link>
		<dc:creator>CPAC: The Star Trek Debate &#124; Christopher Howell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Mar 2009 03:15:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=45423#comment-1934039</guid>
		<description>[...] Morrissey to a debate on the relative merits of Real Star Trek vs. the sacrileges that followed it. From Hot Air: Tommy notes with some justification that we seem to reverse political roles when it comes to Trek. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Morrissey to a debate on the relative merits of Real Star Trek vs. the sacrileges that followed it. From Hot Air: Tommy notes with some justification that we seem to reverse political roles when it comes to Trek. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: El Coqui</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/02/28/video-the-great-star-trek-debate/comment-page-1/#comment-1933611</link>
		<dc:creator>El Coqui</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Mar 2009 00:10:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=45423#comment-1933611</guid>
		<description>The Federation is a socialist state, pure and simply. That&#039;s why I love DS9 because it started to show the boils under the uniform. Did anyone ever wonder why &lt;strong&gt;Starfleet&lt;/strong&gt; best and brightest were defecting to the Maquis?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Federation is a socialist state, pure and simply. That&#8217;s why I love DS9 because it started to show the boils under the uniform. Did anyone ever wonder why <strong>Starfleet</strong> best and brightest were defecting to the Maquis?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: CyberCipher</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/02/28/video-the-great-star-trek-debate/comment-page-1/#comment-1932035</link>
		<dc:creator>CyberCipher</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Mar 2009 17:34:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=45423#comment-1932035</guid>
		<description>My collie says:
&lt;blockquote&gt;I agreed with the Ferengi when they expressed their outrage about one thing, viz. clothed females?! How ridiculous!&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Which is why we don&#039;t put dogs in charge of things, collie.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My collie says:</p>
<blockquote><p>I agreed with the Ferengi when they expressed their outrage about one thing, viz. clothed females?! How ridiculous!</p></blockquote>
<p>Which is why we don&#8217;t put dogs in charge of things, collie.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: eaglescout1998</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/02/28/video-the-great-star-trek-debate/comment-page-1/#comment-1931728</link>
		<dc:creator>eaglescout1998</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Mar 2009 09:31:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=45423#comment-1931728</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;The problem with Next Generation was that the word diagnostics was used every time something was going wrong.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

You may want to check the Heisenberg compensators. And while you&#039;re at it, reconfigure the deflector dish to emit an inverse tachyon pulse.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>The problem with Next Generation was that the word diagnostics was used every time something was going wrong.</p></blockquote>
<p>You may want to check the Heisenberg compensators. And while you&#8217;re at it, reconfigure the deflector dish to emit an inverse tachyon pulse.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: deewhybee</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/02/28/video-the-great-star-trek-debate/comment-page-1/#comment-1931657</link>
		<dc:creator>deewhybee</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Mar 2009 07:12:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=45423#comment-1931657</guid>
		<description>I like the original series and it has nothing to do with politics or story telling.  I like it because it was campy.  I like it because the women wore revealing clothes and I like cleavage.  It was on when I was a kid and we didn&#039;t have the Internet and we had to take what we could get.  I wonder how many of you other guys agree but don&#039;t want to admit it.  

The problem with Next Generation was that the word diagnostics was used every time something was going wrong.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I like the original series and it has nothing to do with politics or story telling.  I like it because it was campy.  I like it because the women wore revealing clothes and I like cleavage.  It was on when I was a kid and we didn&#8217;t have the Internet and we had to take what we could get.  I wonder how many of you other guys agree but don&#8217;t want to admit it.  </p>
<p>The problem with Next Generation was that the word diagnostics was used every time something was going wrong.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sulla</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/02/28/video-the-great-star-trek-debate/comment-page-1/#comment-1931560</link>
		<dc:creator>sulla</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Mar 2009 06:08:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=45423#comment-1931560</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;eaglescout1998 on February 28, 2009 at 11:08 PM&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Heh.  The USS Scarface.  &quot;Arm photon torpedoes!  Kahless, say hallo to my leeetle friends!&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>eaglescout1998 on February 28, 2009 at 11:08 PM</p></blockquote>
<p>Heh.  The USS Scarface.  &#8220;Arm photon torpedoes!  Kahless, say hallo to my leeetle friends!&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: baldilocks</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/02/28/video-the-great-star-trek-debate/comment-page-1/#comment-1931502</link>
		<dc:creator>baldilocks</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Mar 2009 05:41:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=45423#comment-1931502</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;DS9 had great plot arcs and fun villians (Weyoun, Gul Dukat).

Gideon7 on February 28, 2009 at 6:35 PM&lt;/blockquote&gt;DS9 was my favorite too, though Avery Brooks&#039; (Sisko) acting performances were spotty.  DS9 had the best violence and intrigue.

And, yes, the villains were fun, especially Garak. You never knew what was up with that guy.

And DS9 was the first of the series to feature an enlisted man in the regular cast.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>DS9 had great plot arcs and fun villians (Weyoun, Gul Dukat).</p>
<p>Gideon7 on February 28, 2009 at 6:35 PM</p></blockquote>
<p>DS9 was my favorite too, though Avery Brooks&#8217; (Sisko) acting performances were spotty.  DS9 had the best violence and intrigue.</p>
<p>And, yes, the villains were fun, especially Garak. You never knew what was up with that guy.</p>
<p>And DS9 was the first of the series to feature an enlisted man in the regular cast.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ScottMcC</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/02/28/video-the-great-star-trek-debate/comment-page-1/#comment-1931432</link>
		<dc:creator>ScottMcC</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Mar 2009 05:11:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=45423#comment-1931432</guid>
		<description>Remember: 
Even numbered &lt;em&gt;Star Trek&lt;/em&gt; movies
Odd numbered &lt;em&gt;Planet of the Apes&lt;/em&gt; movies</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Remember:<br />
Even numbered <em>Star Trek</em> movies<br />
Odd numbered <em>Planet of the Apes</em> movies</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: eaglescout1998</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/02/28/video-the-great-star-trek-debate/comment-page-1/#comment-1931270</link>
		<dc:creator>eaglescout1998</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Mar 2009 04:08:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=45423#comment-1931270</guid>
		<description>I just had the disturbing image of Al Pacino playing the captain of a Federation starship. Ahead Warp Factor 5 . . . who ha!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I just had the disturbing image of Al Pacino playing the captain of a Federation starship. Ahead Warp Factor 5 . . . who ha!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Al in St. Lou</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/02/28/video-the-great-star-trek-debate/comment-page-1/#comment-1930980</link>
		<dc:creator>Al in St. Lou</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Mar 2009 02:52:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=45423#comment-1930980</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;eaglescout1998 on February 28, 2009 at 7:38 PM&lt;/blockquote&gt;

That was done already. It was called &lt;em&gt;Blake&#039;s 7.&lt;/em&gt; It showed what the Federation would &lt;em&gt;really &lt;/em&gt;be like.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>eaglescout1998 on February 28, 2009 at 7:38 PM</p></blockquote>
<p>That was done already. It was called <em>Blake&#8217;s 7.</em> It showed what the Federation would <em>really </em>be like.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ernesto</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/02/28/video-the-great-star-trek-debate/comment-page-1/#comment-1930609</link>
		<dc:creator>ernesto</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Mar 2009 00:49:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=45423#comment-1930609</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;eaglescout1998 on February 28, 2009 at 7:19 PM
&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Which is what provides the impetus for man to put down childish things and take to the stars. I think its time for DARPA to start working on those replicators, transporters, and warp drives.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>eaglescout1998 on February 28, 2009 at 7:19 PM
</p></blockquote>
<p>Which is what provides the impetus for man to put down childish things and take to the stars. I think its time for DARPA to start working on those replicators, transporters, and warp drives.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: eaglescout1998</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/02/28/video-the-great-star-trek-debate/comment-page-1/#comment-1930593</link>
		<dc:creator>eaglescout1998</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Mar 2009 00:38:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=45423#comment-1930593</guid>
		<description>I am also not too sure how I will respond to this new movie. Rather than reboot the original series, I would prefer it jump forward a few hundred years.

I think that part of the problem with the franchise is they they&#039;ve run out of unique stories to tell. Star Trek was a big cash cow for Paramount and they milked it for all it was worth. An interesting concept I thought of was a story in which the Federation are actually the antagonists.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am also not too sure how I will respond to this new movie. Rather than reboot the original series, I would prefer it jump forward a few hundred years.</p>
<p>I think that part of the problem with the franchise is they they&#8217;ve run out of unique stories to tell. Star Trek was a big cash cow for Paramount and they milked it for all it was worth. An interesting concept I thought of was a story in which the Federation are actually the antagonists.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: LifeTrek</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/02/28/video-the-great-star-trek-debate/comment-page-1/#comment-1930586</link>
		<dc:creator>LifeTrek</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Mar 2009 00:34:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=45423#comment-1930586</guid>
		<description>Sisco was a terrible actor -- the role could have been a good one, but he acted like he was trying to be a Black Kirk, if you .... know what.... I... mean!

Oh, and the gold in gold pressed latinum was worthless -- it was just a substance that held the valuable latinum.
David</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sisco was a terrible actor &#8212; the role could have been a good one, but he acted like he was trying to be a Black Kirk, if you &#8230;. know what&#8230;. I&#8230; mean!</p>
<p>Oh, and the gold in gold pressed latinum was worthless &#8212; it was just a substance that held the valuable latinum.<br />
David</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Fred 2</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/02/28/video-the-great-star-trek-debate/comment-page-1/#comment-1930572</link>
		<dc:creator>Fred 2</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Mar 2009 00:28:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=45423#comment-1930572</guid>
		<description>If you can replicate everything and you are afraid of corrupting other civilizations why exactly do you need Faster Than Light travel? Isn&#039;t it easier to stay home? The Next Generation never seemed to have a compelling excuse to do anything unless you believe that being a &quot;Taxi Cab to the Stars&quot; for diplomats is worth the effort.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If you can replicate everything and you are afraid of corrupting other civilizations why exactly do you need Faster Than Light travel? Isn&#8217;t it easier to stay home? The Next Generation never seemed to have a compelling excuse to do anything unless you believe that being a &#8220;Taxi Cab to the Stars&#8221; for diplomats is worth the effort.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: LifeTrek</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/02/28/video-the-great-star-trek-debate/comment-page-1/#comment-1930559</link>
		<dc:creator>LifeTrek</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Mar 2009 00:22:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=45423#comment-1930559</guid>
		<description>Enterprise, for me was a huge disappointment.  Who wants to go backward in Star Trek -- less tech for me was a deal breaker -- I watched more for the tech then the story.
David</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Enterprise, for me was a huge disappointment.  Who wants to go backward in Star Trek &#8212; less tech for me was a deal breaker &#8212; I watched more for the tech then the story.<br />
David</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: eaglescout1998</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/02/28/video-the-great-star-trek-debate/comment-page-1/#comment-1930546</link>
		<dc:creator>eaglescout1998</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Mar 2009 00:19:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=45423#comment-1930546</guid>
		<description>I grew up watching &quot;Next Generation&quot; and &quot;Deep Space Nine.&quot; I was not fond of &quot;Voyager&quot; and I just couldn&#039;t get that interested in &quot;Enterprise&quot; in spite of the fact it starred Scott Bakula (&quot;Quantum Leap&quot; was another favorite of mine).

This may sound nutty, but I have long thought of the Star Trek universe as one where communism actually works. Think about it. There is apparently limitless energy and the ability to turn energy into any material good. Thus, there is no longer the conflict between unlimited wants and limited resources.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I grew up watching &#8220;Next Generation&#8221; and &#8220;Deep Space Nine.&#8221; I was not fond of &#8220;Voyager&#8221; and I just couldn&#8217;t get that interested in &#8220;Enterprise&#8221; in spite of the fact it starred Scott Bakula (&#8220;Quantum Leap&#8221; was another favorite of mine).</p>
<p>This may sound nutty, but I have long thought of the Star Trek universe as one where communism actually works. Think about it. There is apparently limitless energy and the ability to turn energy into any material good. Thus, there is no longer the conflict between unlimited wants and limited resources.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: LifeTrek</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/02/28/video-the-great-star-trek-debate/comment-page-1/#comment-1930541</link>
		<dc:creator>LifeTrek</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Mar 2009 00:18:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=45423#comment-1930541</guid>
		<description>Voyager was panned but was actually more like the original in philsophy then any of the others (unknown space and races, limited oversight, solid principals, The Final Frontier -- less preachy then TNG), but I liked them all (DS-9 was my least favorite -- who wants to see an outpost where people come and go, passive trek!)

Ferengi&#039;s aren&#039;t part of the Federation -- but really the whole concept of being without money was foolish -- trading holodeck time is currency or at least bartering which only proves that capitalism is forever enduring.

Holodecks are the logical conclusion to po n -- I mean entertainment.  Progression = reading books, listening to the radio, watching television, interacting holodecks.

David
Giligans Island -- seriously, Janeway was second to only Kirk in bending the rules including the Prime Directive.  Both were rugged individualism in space!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Voyager was panned but was actually more like the original in philsophy then any of the others (unknown space and races, limited oversight, solid principals, The Final Frontier &#8212; less preachy then TNG), but I liked them all (DS-9 was my least favorite &#8212; who wants to see an outpost where people come and go, passive trek!)</p>
<p>Ferengi&#8217;s aren&#8217;t part of the Federation &#8212; but really the whole concept of being without money was foolish &#8212; trading holodeck time is currency or at least bartering which only proves that capitalism is forever enduring.</p>
<p>Holodecks are the logical conclusion to po n &#8212; I mean entertainment.  Progression = reading books, listening to the radio, watching television, interacting holodecks.</p>
<p>David<br />
Giligans Island &#8212; seriously, Janeway was second to only Kirk in bending the rules including the Prime Directive.  Both were rugged individualism in space!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Yngmarine</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/02/28/video-the-great-star-trek-debate/comment-page-1/#comment-1930485</link>
		<dc:creator>Yngmarine</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Feb 2009 23:43:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=45423#comment-1930485</guid>
		<description>The Ferengi are NOT in the federation. And seriously, what effect does money have when food and all material wants are provided by a machine. You don&#039;t buy anything because you can replicate everything. Thats not socialism, thats just freaking awesome. However, TNG episode the Neutral Zone made me think someone on the writers team cried a bit when the Berlin wall fell.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Ferengi are NOT in the federation. And seriously, what effect does money have when food and all material wants are provided by a machine. You don&#8217;t buy anything because you can replicate everything. Thats not socialism, thats just freaking awesome. However, TNG episode the Neutral Zone made me think someone on the writers team cried a bit when the Berlin wall fell.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gideon7</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/02/28/video-the-great-star-trek-debate/comment-page-1/#comment-1930477</link>
		<dc:creator>Gideon7</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Feb 2009 23:35:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=45423#comment-1930477</guid>
		<description>DS9 had great plot arcs and fun villians (Weyoun, Gul Dukat).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>DS9 had great plot arcs and fun villians (Weyoun, Gul Dukat).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: radjah shelduck</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/02/28/video-the-great-star-trek-debate/comment-page-1/#comment-1930471</link>
		<dc:creator>radjah shelduck</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Feb 2009 23:28:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=45423#comment-1930471</guid>
		<description>Gold PRESSED latinum, Ed, not gold plated latinum.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Gold PRESSED latinum, Ed, not gold plated latinum.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SeniorD</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/02/28/video-the-great-star-trek-debate/comment-page-1/#comment-1930442</link>
		<dc:creator>SeniorD</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Feb 2009 22:51:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=45423#comment-1930442</guid>
		<description>As I said previously, TOS had cast members enabled viewers to willingly suspend their disbelief.  TNG, DS9 and Voyager did not, the high tech backdrops, creation of new things (i.e. &#039;tetrion particles&#039;) simply gave the writers something to blame when they couldn&#039;t come up with valid reasons something didn&#039;t work.

Sure, I watched the various spin-offs, but got really annoyed.  For example, in DS9 Sisko is seen sitting in the Captain&#039;s chair, issuing commands to the helmsman while simultaneously commanding a fleet of Starships.  Also, the spacing between those ships is REAL tight.  Can one imagine a Galaxy-class starship doing tight turns within the range of another?  Stretches the imagination too far.

&#039;sides, I prefer forming the images in my head as I read good Science-Fiction (like David Weber or John Ringo).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As I said previously, TOS had cast members enabled viewers to willingly suspend their disbelief.  TNG, DS9 and Voyager did not, the high tech backdrops, creation of new things (i.e. &#8216;tetrion particles&#8217;) simply gave the writers something to blame when they couldn&#8217;t come up with valid reasons something didn&#8217;t work.</p>
<p>Sure, I watched the various spin-offs, but got really annoyed.  For example, in DS9 Sisko is seen sitting in the Captain&#8217;s chair, issuing commands to the helmsman while simultaneously commanding a fleet of Starships.  Also, the spacing between those ships is REAL tight.  Can one imagine a Galaxy-class starship doing tight turns within the range of another?  Stretches the imagination too far.</p>
<p>&#8216;sides, I prefer forming the images in my head as I read good Science-Fiction (like David Weber or John Ringo).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Feedie</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/02/28/video-the-great-star-trek-debate/comment-page-1/#comment-1930418</link>
		<dc:creator>Feedie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Feb 2009 22:26:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=45423#comment-1930418</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;Del Dolemonte on February 28, 2009 at 4:03 PM&lt;/blockquote&gt;
One thing I notice is most of today&#039;s actors look like modeling school drop-outs.  The casting couch hasn&#039;t been just-for-women for a long time.  Actors on the old shows had more of an everyman look and there were natural beauties among the actresses (not to mention talent).

When Boston Legal was watchable (barely), I watched because of Shatner.  He had a similar reputation anyway, and it was funny watching him play himself.

There is good and evil out there; TOS recognized this instinctively.  TNG tried the pacifist approach and ditched it late in the first season.  That&#039;s where it got its running legs.  People want to see the eternal conflict, and the consequences and lessons in a good story.  Liberal fantasies are boring and unrealistic.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Del Dolemonte on February 28, 2009 at 4:03 PM</p></blockquote>
<p>One thing I notice is most of today&#8217;s actors look like modeling school drop-outs.  The casting couch hasn&#8217;t been just-for-women for a long time.  Actors on the old shows had more of an everyman look and there were natural beauties among the actresses (not to mention talent).</p>
<p>When Boston Legal was watchable (barely), I watched because of Shatner.  He had a similar reputation anyway, and it was funny watching him play himself.</p>
<p>There is good and evil out there; TOS recognized this instinctively.  TNG tried the pacifist approach and ditched it late in the first season.  That&#8217;s where it got its running legs.  People want to see the eternal conflict, and the consequences and lessons in a good story.  Liberal fantasies are boring and unrealistic.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sulla</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/02/28/video-the-great-star-trek-debate/comment-page-1/#comment-1930417</link>
		<dc:creator>sulla</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Feb 2009 22:25:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=45423#comment-1930417</guid>
		<description>My guilty pleasure was Voyager.  And I very much enjoyed DS9, which seemed to have more than a few conservative undertones. TNG and Enterprise never did it for me.

But there&#039;s only one &lt;em&gt;Star Trek&lt;/em&gt;.  Only one Enterprise.  No bloody A, no bloody B, just the classic NCC-1701.  When men were men, women were underdressed, and everyone talked like starving Shakespearian actors on styrofoam stages.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My guilty pleasure was Voyager.  And I very much enjoyed DS9, which seemed to have more than a few conservative undertones. TNG and Enterprise never did it for me.</p>
<p>But there&#8217;s only one <em>Star Trek</em>.  Only one Enterprise.  No bloody A, no bloody B, just the classic NCC-1701.  When men were men, women were underdressed, and everyone talked like starving Shakespearian actors on styrofoam stages.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Del Dolemonte</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/02/28/video-the-great-star-trek-debate/comment-page-1/#comment-1930330</link>
		<dc:creator>Del Dolemonte</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Feb 2009 21:03:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=45423#comment-1930330</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;Feedie on February 28, 2009 at 2:20 PM
&lt;/blockquote&gt;

You got it exactly right. The original series (or as it&#039;s fondly known, &quot;TOS&quot;), had some absolutely brilliant stories.

Here in New England we have several stations still showing TOS. Fittingly enough, over the past 2 weeks they have been showing the classic episode &quot;The Savage Curtain&quot;-where Shatner gets to &quot;meet&quot; his hero, Abraham Lincoln.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Feedie on February 28, 2009 at 2:20 PM
</p></blockquote>
<p>You got it exactly right. The original series (or as it&#8217;s fondly known, &#8220;TOS&#8221;), had some absolutely brilliant stories.</p>
<p>Here in New England we have several stations still showing TOS. Fittingly enough, over the past 2 weeks they have been showing the classic episode &#8220;The Savage Curtain&#8221;-where Shatner gets to &#8220;meet&#8221; his hero, Abraham Lincoln.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rob verdi</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/02/28/video-the-great-star-trek-debate/comment-page-1/#comment-1930329</link>
		<dc:creator>rob verdi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Feb 2009 21:03:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=45423#comment-1930329</guid>
		<description>a private little war where both the federation and the klingons funnel weapons to competing sides is one of the more relevant pieces of science fiction.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>a private little war where both the federation and the klingons funnel weapons to competing sides is one of the more relevant pieces of science fiction.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
