Video: Coulter at CPAC
posted at 2:02 pm on February 28, 2009 by Allahpundit
I tuned in halfway through, caught a bunch of well-delivered one-liners, and stuck around to the end of the Q&A to hear her tell Obama he’s kidding himself if he thinks we can win in Afghanistan. Evidently we’re the anti-war party now. Or the party that opposes The One just for the sake of opposing him.
Live TV : Ustream
Blowback
Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.
Trackbacks/Pings
Trackback URL
Comments
Comment pages: « Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 Next »
We are not the anti war party, what is our objective-mission in Afghanistan? Who are we after (Terrorist) and what is the goal? If we are in Afghanistan to pour our much needed dollars into them via Nation Building forget it(not by ourselves where is the International Community?) IF we are there to hunt down and destroy our enemies, then I am all for it. Now Identify our enemy. (Al Qeada) the Taliban, can be re absorbed into their tribes mainly Pashtun. The Terrorist are our enemy, marginalizing and destroying them should be our Goal.
Pakistan says wins key region on Afghan border. The Pakistanis have taken over one of the Key Agencies, and say they will have control of all 5 Agencies by the end of the year, and returned to Government control. Wouldn’t this be good news?
http://news.yahoo.com/s/nm/20090228/ts_nm/us_pakistan_bajaur_2
“Khan said he had no information about Zawahri’s whereabouts but his forces had killed and arrested several Arab fighters.
Officials say more than 1,500 militants were killed, along with about 100 soldiers, during the “Operation Sher Dil” launched in Bajaur in September. There has been no independent verification of that militant casualty estimate.
Hard-pressed militants led by an al Qaeda ally, Faqir Mohammad, this week declared a unilateral ceasefire in Bajaur. Khan said he rejected an offer of talks and went ahead with military operations.”
Dr Evil on February 28, 2009 at 4:20 PM
Uh, why would conservatives want their own equivalent to MoveOn.org, anyways?
terryannonline on February 28, 2009 at 4:22 PM
I’ve read your blog and certainly don’t think you’re a Socialist. But with the entire left ready to bash anyone on our side, I do wonder why do you feel the need to do it so fervently also? As far as RUsh, I don’t see your condemnations of his comments making very much sense. Honestly, as well written as your other stuff is, I get the impression by your comments that you don’t actually listen to much of Limbaugh.
If I wanted more Conservative bashing, I’d run over to HuffPo.
hawkdriver on February 28, 2009 at 4:23 PM
“Major-General Tariq Khan, who is commanding military operations in five of the seven agencies, said his paramilitary Frontier Corps (FC) had driven militants out of Bajaur, the smallest of the agencies but a major infiltration route into Afghanistan, after a six-month offensive.
“They have lost. They have lost their cohesion here,” Khan told reporters on a trip arranged by the military to Bajaur and Mohmand agencies. “The resistance has collapsed.”
He said his forces had also largely restored “a reasonable state of stability,” in the four other agencies under his command.
“If you are asking me about five agencies … I think somewhere by the end of the year or so we would, more or less, be over with the military operations,” he said.
Khan said his forces planned to hand over control of Bajaur, the most northerly of the tribal areas and opposite the Afghan province of Kunar, to government authorities next week.”
Fight Smarter NOT Harder.
http://news.yahoo.com/s/nm/20090228/ts_nm/us_pakistan_bajaur_2
Dr Evil on February 28, 2009 at 4:23 PM
Bappa Rawal. Times are different, but it’s definitely doable.
Christien on February 28, 2009 at 4:24 PM
Ann is a smartass, Bugs Bunny was too, its that smartass attitude that along with terms like FUBAR, won WWII and is fully part and parcel of every great success this nation has or will ever enjoy.
Its the wanton killing of the uniquely American spirit that is the legacy of liberalism.
Afghanistan is not Iraq, against a brutal organized dictator the conqueror card plays well, in the Afgani part of the world the tack employed so far of ally, aid abet, guide and enforce is exactly right, play the conqueror there and Ann will win that part of the argument.
Speakup on February 28, 2009 at 4:27 PM
You guys just don’t get it do ya? The feel good play nice horse-$hit has been played for years by the Bush kids. What did it get them? The dems just find another reason to bash them just as outrageously as they bash Ann or Rush. They can manufacture outrage over anything. So let them do it over Ann and at least we get a little sarcasm and satire to belittle them and their policies. That has always been one of the most effective means of winning the political debate, to show just how ridiculous your opponent is.
If you don’t have the stomach for the fight, don’t bitch about those who are doing your fighting for you!
conservnut on February 28, 2009 at 4:28 PM
Ann speaks for me! She’s witty and on target. She speaks the conservative truths as she sees them. Her purpose at CPAC is as much to fire up the troops as it is to lampoon the foolishness of our political opposition. She does well in getting to the heart of issues, as does Rush.
She’s not a politician. She doesn’t have to tip-toe diplomatically for a general audience. And she’s funny as hell.
“Johnson-esque” Bwahahahaha! You go, girl.
Better Ann as a conservative spokeswoman than the snide Noonan or Parker (who was beside herself in being allowed to fly with the Obamas to Chicago over the Valentine’s weekend. Ain’t love grand?)
onlineanalyst on February 28, 2009 at 4:28 PM
http://www.maplandia.com/pakistan/f-a-t-a/bajaur/
I would still like to know what the 17,000 more troops going into Afghanistan are going to be used for? What will their mission be?
Dr Evil on February 28, 2009 at 4:31 PM
“The Republican Party cannot be the anti-war Party and be, as it should be, the pro-military Party of national security and responsibility.”
We aren’t “anti” or “pro” war. We aren’t “anti” or “pro” the “military” as an abstraction. This is a major difference between liberals and conservatives.
They have a list of “good guys” and “bad guys”. They are anti-military, anti-war, anti-rich, anti-Jew, pro-criminal, pro-abortion, anti-business, pro-spending.
We are for the application of reason and principles to problem solving. We believed in war against Hitler, and Saddam Hussein, but have serious criticisms about Clinton’s various adventures in Somalia and the Balkans. We support our troops, but we are not blindly pro-military in that we spend money on every military project. We won World War III without firing a shot, remember?
One of the issues that annoys me most is “regulation”. Democrats say they are “pro-regulation” and accuse us of supporting “deregulation”. When it comes to regulations, obviously it matters WHAT regulations you’re talking about! Democrats refused regulation of the subprime mortgage issue, and then blamed this “deregulation” for the crisis, now justifying new, stupid regulations. Quantity of regulation, not substance of it, becomes the issue. I cringe every time I hear a liberal journalist ask a conservative, “Are you for regulation or deregulation?”
joe_doufu on February 28, 2009 at 4:36 PM
Just finished watching Ann’s speech.
Excellent speech!
Norwegian on February 28, 2009 at 4:42 PM
Terry, you never seem to miss an opportunity to slam her, but you also never read her or even listen to her (as evidenced by what you even said here).
For the record, she made jokes. People used to like that.
And as to her comment about Afghanistan, it’s not unfounded. She is right that many have tried, and many failed. And considering Obama wants to “win” while cutting funding for the military, does anyone here even believe she’s wrong?
It’ll be hard, and it’s being fought by an anti-war Democrat.
Though you criticize Coulter for opposing Obama, just because, many of you do the exact same with Coulter not even giving her the benefit of doubt that you’d give Obama, Matthews or Olberman. And then you cry when our own politicians won’t stand up for us and really stick it to Congress by saying the thing Dogbert (from Dilbert) said as though we actually reward people who do that.
Esthier on February 28, 2009 at 4:44 PM
That is if Bill Maher sold any books.
wryteacher on February 28, 2009 at 4:44 PM
Horrible, horrible and ignorant point. The Obama campaign slandered them both with an out-of-context quote.
Is this what you’re supporting? Because you don’t seem to know the difference.
Esthier on February 28, 2009 at 4:49 PM
We half way concede to the left when we cannibalize our own. We have enough enemies without fighting our own. Ann, when listened to, makes our argument. Stop with the political correctness, and fight like our country depends on it, because it does.
jainphx on February 28, 2009 at 4:52 PM
I LOVE COULTER!
GAWD, reading through the thread and all the Coulter bashing is such a yawn.
Is it possible to have a diverse conservative party, be entertained by the vast array of personalities and opinions and still appreciate the core of what we represent?
It appears that conservatives are adopting the sickness of the left in that some of us are striving for that perfect uptopian symbol of representation. Just enjoy the the players and give it a rest in the party. OY FREAKIN’ VEY folks.
katy on February 28, 2009 at 4:54 PM
To the ones that whine about Rush and Ann hurting the conservative or Republican cause, the liberals will always find someone to demonize. They both have the guts to tell the truth regardless of whether it causes people to not buy their book or listen to their program. They are the ones with the audience, are expected to have the ready answers, get physically and/or verbally accosted, and all you can manage is to sit at your keyboard and piss and moan about how abrasive they are. Get a thicker skin, because we’re only one month in and it’s going to get nastier.
donnak on February 28, 2009 at 4:55 PM
She’s right Obama is just continuing George W Bush’s national security policy. The circumstances in Pakistan, I posted above started back in September that is while Bush was in Office, this Pakistani Military leader is saying, what they started during the Bush Administration is what is bearing fruit now and securing an important Pakistan agency Bajaur. I don’t think that would have been undertaken under the Obama Administration.
Dr Evil on February 28, 2009 at 4:56 PM
Your leader rush is on CNN.
Just awful.
getalife on February 28, 2009 at 4:56 PM
#1 — Exactly where is there evidence of this?
And C) — “we’re” — you got a mouse in your pocket there Gumby? Who is it you think you speak for?
Stephen M on February 28, 2009 at 5:00 PM
Semi OT: Speaking of wars, the Truth Commission is going to be a reality, according to the Chicago Tribune.
youngTXcon on February 28, 2009 at 5:03 PM
These are my favorite conservatives.
The Dems don’t have anyone of their caliber or character. That’s why the Dems spend so much energy demonizing them. Pay attention to whom or what they belittle and lie about. Those are the conservative movement people that Dems fear.
onlineanalyst on February 28, 2009 at 5:09 PM
I think of Allahpundit as more of a Kathleen Parker conservative. Shave his head!
Blake on February 28, 2009 at 5:11 PM
“Really! And that’s not the left crying. It’s weenie’s on Hot Air!”
How right you are! Is Allah attracting all these “I’m so embarrassed by Ann Coulter” weenie, CINOs? Have the double Ds, Brooks and Frum, invaded Hot Air with a plethora of pen names and mushy moderate posts? We get called worse than Coulter could ever dream up every day for eight straight years, our government is being overrun by Bolsheviks and I’m going to be embarrassed by Ann Coulter? Uh, no.
ncjetsfan on February 28, 2009 at 5:14 PM
True conservatives never have been for such “nation building” in Crapistan Islamic Sharia based constitutions $hit-holes.
MB4 on February 28, 2009 at 5:15 PM
Why is AP such a sourpuss? Her speech was good and funny. Seriously, there’s a difference between being snarky and critical and just being negative. Sometimes it’s not even enjoyable to read you anymore because of how pessimistic, mean, and negative you are (emphasis on sometimes).
Ann Coulter is great, funny, and right about most of what she says. No she isn’t perfect, no everything she says isn’t going to be the best thing evar. But by and large she’s right and frankly is a lot more positive and constructive than you are AP.
Kronos on February 28, 2009 at 5:18 PM
Mitt Romney just won the CPAC straw poll for the third year in a row. Jindal came in second, Palin and Ron Paul tied for third. Gingrich came in fourth and Huckabee was fifth.
JA on February 28, 2009 at 5:23 PM
Circa 2012:
Just about four years ago I set out on Obama’s Afghanistan road,
Seekin’ my fame and glory, lookin’ to turn the place into a pot of gold.
Well, things got bad, and things got worse, I guess you will know the tune.
Oh ! lord, stuck in Obama’s Afghanistan again.
Flew in on a big plane, I hope I’ll be in one piece flyin out when I go.
I was just passin’ through, must now be yet another 2 tours or more.
Running out of time and patience, looks like they took more of my friends.
Oh ! lord, Im stuck in Obama’s Afghanistan again.
The Hope and Change man in the White House said yet again I was on my way.
Somewhere I lost his connection, he ran out of words to say.
I came into Kabul, a one year stand, looks like the plans fell through again
Oh ! lord, stuck in Obama’s Afghanistan again.
Mmmm…
If I only had a woman, for evry Obama tour Ive done.
And evry time Ive had to fight while Obama and Biden sat back home power drunk.
You know, Id like to catch the next plane back to where Im from.
Oh ! lord, Im stuck in Obama’s Afghanistan again.
Oh ! lord, Im stuck in Obama’s Afghanistan again.
- CCR Soldier Boy
MB4 on February 28, 2009 at 5:23 PM
rush is making a fool of himself and your party with his rant.
Total clown.
getalife on February 28, 2009 at 5:34 PM
Please, take your own name’s advise. You have nothing whatsoever to add here. Liberals are one thing, trolls are another, and I don’t even know what you are.
Esthier on February 28, 2009 at 5:34 PM
Rush is live on FOX news right now.
RedState is liveblogging his speech.
INC on February 28, 2009 at 5:35 PM
Coulter is true to herself. She calls a spade a spade as she sees it. Her type of honesty is almost non-existant on the liberal side.
docdave on February 28, 2009 at 5:40 PM
Esthier on February 28, 2009 at 5:34 PM
Just call em like I see em.
Embarrassing.
getalife on February 28, 2009 at 5:42 PM
CPAC’s convention reminds of a Star Trek convention. Freaks and Geeks.
Atlanta Voter on February 28, 2009 at 5:43 PM
Allahpundit needs to crawl back into the obscurity from which he arose and he can take Ed Morrissey with him. It’s time for MIA Michelle to bring some law and order (and conservatism) back to Hot Air.
Percy_Peabody on February 28, 2009 at 5:48 PM
No amount of study of getalife’s comments would permit us to infer the existence of a his having a life or a clue.
Tav on February 28, 2009 at 5:49 PM
we need more people like Ann and Rush and less people like Noonan and Frum. Ann and Rush know what true conservatism is.
Rose on February 28, 2009 at 5:50 PM
So why do you watch? Think any of us watch Olberman or Maddow? I have better thing to do with my time than listen those tools. Seriously, get a life. Leave Soros’s payroll and get a real job.
BuckeyeSam on February 28, 2009 at 5:54 PM
This is excellent.
therightwinger on February 28, 2009 at 5:55 PM
Comrade. You are confused. The orders were to use “rant” with Santelli. With Limbaugh, we are to use “fat”, “drug addicted, head of the Republican party.
JiangxiDad on February 28, 2009 at 5:56 PM
Esthier on February 28, 2009 at 5:34 PM
It was on CNN.
If he was good with a good message , I would say so.
It was a rant and he was all over the place.
A joke.
getalife on February 28, 2009 at 5:57 PM
We’re not quite surer if G.A.L is male.
Actually we’re not quite sure G.A.L. is female.
We’re just treading cautiously at this point.
katy on February 28, 2009 at 5:58 PM
Don’t we wish that our political leaders could think on their feet as well as Ann? No news anchor can push her around. She can put them in their place without any trouble (as she did with Couric a while back.) Her points are all valid and she is a better comedian than Leno or Letterman ever hoped to be. (And she writes her own stuff!)
Christian Conservative on February 28, 2009 at 5:59 PM
Ditto!!!
klickink.wordpress.com on February 28, 2009 at 6:00 PM
katy on February 28, 2009 at 5:58 PM
Does it matter?
getalife on February 28, 2009 at 6:00 PM
I can never understand that either. Why would anyone who wasn’t a Rep. or conservative come here to talk to/argue with other readers. (I can understand reading the stories–everyone likes the truth, even those Obama apologists who come here to learn what defenses they must develop for the next day.)
I’ve read the few HuffPo articles linked to from here, and occasionally have read Dem underground during the campaign, but I would never consider reading it regularly, let alone having a conversation with anyone there.
Seriously, I think the level of intelligence here is just too much for some to ignore. Literally, they can’t find it elsewhere.
JiangxiDad on February 28, 2009 at 6:01 PM
It’s funny that when Allahpundit posts something about truly intelligent conservatives with the correct attitude towards his The One that he exposes his love for our Marxist leader.
klickink.wordpress.com on February 28, 2009 at 6:02 PM
I was having a discussion with a liberal acquaintance at a DQ about The One and people wanting him to fail.
I let him now that I too stood firm with such an attitude.
“But if he fails the country fails!”
No, I argued. The man is the opposite of my political philosophy and therefore I have no choice but to oppose him.
Then I told him that since what AP’s The One wants will annihilate what little Liberty and Capitalism is left in this country, the man MUST fail.
The One’s failure will perhaps give us another opportunity to breathe life back into the principles of America.
klickink.wordpress.com on February 28, 2009 at 6:07 PM
Ditto.
klickink.wordpress.com on February 28, 2009 at 6:08 PM
JiangxiDad on February 28, 2009 at 6:01 PM
The level of intelligence I have seen at CPAC and the tea parties is very low.
Hell, rush still thinks he is in the majority and the tea parties never mention the greedy bankers.
It is good to read both sides and form your own opinion.
getalife on February 28, 2009 at 6:09 PM
As long as that worthless POS is sitting in the White House and forcing this great nation to swallow both socialism and pauperism just so the Democrats to turn this recession into votes, every conservative should be fighting back and fighting back hard.
As far as I can see, Coulter is a bit too easy on him…
TexasJew on February 28, 2009 at 6:09 PM
Yes GAL it does matter and you know it. Cause we’re conservatives and sex, race, age, religion… it all matters!
You of all people should know this. Let’s move on now!
We’ll continue to work through your issues with you cause we are compassionate racist, sexist, bigoted conservatives. Why can’t you get past this?!!
katy on February 28, 2009 at 6:14 PM
katy on February 28, 2009 at 6:14 PM
I have.
getalife on February 28, 2009 at 6:16 PM
I miss the good old days when dissent was the highest form of patriotism, as evidenced by all those liberals who yearned for the success of George W. Bush.
Kensington on February 28, 2009 at 6:35 PM
Out of curiosity, could you name a couple of those “greedy bankers?” Oh, and you can’t name anyone who was a major contributor to Barney Frank, Chris Dodd, or Barack Obama. Take a couple of weeks to think it over and get back to us.
By the way, tea parties are acts of defiance against oppressive government. Bankers are private citizens, at least for the moment, although Obama is working very hard to change that. So that’s why nobody talked about greedy bankers at the tea parties. Maybe after the banks are nationalized, you’ll hear some of what you’re looking for.
Doctor Zero on February 28, 2009 at 6:36 PM
Ha! Your esteemed opinion is right up there with having an admirer of Velvet Elvis and clown paintings critique Leonardo da Vinci as “embarrassing”.
Buy Danish on February 28, 2009 at 6:38 PM
Ah yes CPAC the nirvana of rational conservative activities and patriotism
Ron Paul beats Palin in the straw poll
Bolton waxes poetic about Chicago being vaporized
Kincaid gets cheers at the Birth cert Truthers
Ann says Afghanistan is a waste of blood and treasure
When will the idiots learn?
Bradky on February 28, 2009 at 6:39 PM
Well I call them like I see them too. You’re embarrassing yourself, and you’re a joke. To us, you’re the the punch line. You don’t read anthing but leftwing crap. Put the koolaid down if you’re going to talk with the big boys and girls.
roopster217 on February 28, 2009 at 6:42 PM
My wife tells me strong women lead families during crisis. Ann Coulter, Michelle Malkin, Monica Crowley, Laura Ingraham – we conservatives are fortunate that these women have national recognition and are fighting the good fight.
Palin 2012!!!!!
Archie Noble on February 28, 2009 at 6:42 PM
That’s profound. I never thought if it in those terms. You are absolutely correct.
TheBigOldDog on February 28, 2009 at 6:47 PM
BD,
Funny you mentioned clown on a comment about rush.
getalife on February 28, 2009 at 6:51 PM
It seems that Sarcasm and dry wit is lost on most of the posters here –
HA seems to be spiraling out off any vague form of Conservative Principles
defendfaithandfamily on February 28, 2009 at 6:52 PM
No…not really…
Tell me though…did you get your increase in pay for trolling this month?…
I heard there was a 5% increase…Any truth to that?
jerrytbg on February 28, 2009 at 6:52 PM
Anyone with any intellectual honesty has to admit that Ann Coulter and Rush Limbaugh are brilliant conservative voices; To offer the argument that they embarrass the party is laughable- as conservatives we are very sure of our positions, and to weaken ourselves by trying to appeal to liberals with “bipartisanship”, (snort) is simply watering down the soup to unpalatable levels. Some of the people on these boards need to grow up and get over their childish need to “be liked”.
anniekc on February 28, 2009 at 6:52 PM
No Rush video yet? I hope it will be available soon.
Kensington on February 28, 2009 at 6:53 PM
On point…
+1+10jerrytbg on February 28, 2009 at 6:56 PM
Put down the incense sticks you are burning to their pictures and get real.
Conservative philosophy is pretty recognizable and has been long before they were born. All Ann and Rush do is package it in schtick and gimmicks to make a very good living. good on them for their business acumen – but to call them the voice of the party is plain silly. Conservatives would gain more converts if the party faithful were better at spreading the message with something more compelling than “RUSH IS RIGHT”.
Bradky on February 28, 2009 at 6:56 PM
Good question.
Pretty bizarre week for the gop.
getalife on February 28, 2009 at 6:57 PM
lol!!!
jerrytbg on February 28, 2009 at 7:00 PM
But she didn’t call them the “voice of the…”
*sigh*
Oh, for crying out loud WHO LEFT GRANDPA ALONE WITH THE INTERNET?
Kensington on February 28, 2009 at 7:01 PM
Considering Ann and Laura have never had a family that is kind of an odd statement. As for Michelle and Monica what sort of crises did they lead their families through?
Bradky on February 28, 2009 at 7:01 PM
Bradky on February 28, 2009 at 6:56 PM
Excuse me. Please enlighten us as to the wisdom of “Bradky”. Perhaps you have a message we can attach ourselves to? Is there a particular conservative vision you have that you’de care to share? Let us know when you have enough information to entice 20 million listeners a day! And now if you’ll excuse me, I’ll be off to light those incense sticks.
anniekc on February 28, 2009 at 7:03 PM
dems fightin’ words… lol !!! You are such a fool…but don’t go away…I need a laugh every now and then…
jerrytbg on February 28, 2009 at 7:04 PM
Oh, for crying out loud WHO LEFT GRANDPA ALONE WITH THE INTERNET?
Kensington on February 28, 2009 at 7:01 PM
oh please. In his dreams he might one day become a grandpa. You need to move out of your parents basement first.
anniekc on February 28, 2009 at 7:05 PM
Ann can really give a speech. Where are the CANDIDATES who can speak like her?
Mojave Mark on February 28, 2009 at 7:05 PM
Gawd that blonde is on fire. She has an inimitable way of emasculating liberal men and shaming their female counterparts as mental midgets. You go, Sista Coulter!!
RepubChica on February 28, 2009 at 7:06 PM
LOL you are a tool indeed. 20 million listeners a day – sez who? Rush? What proof? none of course.
Been out of the basement for a long time and unlike you can actually formulate my own opinions and positions. Unlike you I don’t need to check with Rush for my talking points.
But go right ahead patting yourself on the back hon.
Bradky on February 28, 2009 at 7:08 PM
I’d call what we’re going through now a crisis. And I’m talking about a socialist/communist crisis. But I’m sure anyone who kisses Obama and friends collective feet see it as mana from…whatever it is they believe in.
roopster217 on February 28, 2009 at 7:08 PM
jerrytbg on February 28, 2009 at 7:09 PM
Your cruifixion of the English language provides me a few laughs as well.
Bradky on February 28, 2009 at 7:11 PM
jerrytbg on February 28, 2009 at 7:11 PM
LOL you are a tool indeed. 20 million listeners a day – sez who? Rush? What proof? none of course.
And Mr. Limbaugh is soooo insignificant that YOUR president, Mr. Obama has to call him out personally? You’re a joke, “Bradky” and you always have been. We laugh behind your back.
anniekc on February 28, 2009 at 7:12 PM
ooh… I’m so hurt…not…lol !!!
jerrytbg on February 28, 2009 at 7:13 PM
Hey doofus, he does have an estimated 20 million listeners per week. Look it up if can get your left foot to type fast enough.
RepubChica on February 28, 2009 at 7:13 PM
To be fair, according to Wikipedia, Rush’s audience amounts to somewhere in the neighborhood of at least 13.5 million listeners each week.
In talk radio terms, that’s enough to make him the most popular host on the dial, period. It’s even impressive compared to television ratings.
Kensington on February 28, 2009 at 7:14 PM
It’s high time Allah and Ed went rouge and started banning the tin foil hat wearing Far Right loons who comment here endlessly only for the sake of whiny sour grape laced partisanship and Truther madness about Obama.
Allah needs to evoke the memory of William F Buckley and drive these Bircher type loons back into Far Right hell where they belong.
AprilOrit on February 28, 2009 at 7:14 PM
news flash babe. Obama is Our president. He and Rush deserve each other as far as I see it. As for talking about yourself in plural… get some counseling.
Bradky on February 28, 2009 at 7:14 PM
Besides brakey… bradky or what eve your moniker is…
Have you ever had an orginal thought…
You’re the one who bought up taking points…gee…
tell me though…did you get your increase?
jerrytbg on February 28, 2009 at 7:17 PM
Bradky on February 28, 2009 at 7:14 PM
Sorry toots- Barry may sleep in the Whitehouse, but he’s not my president. And here’s another scary thought for you, “Bradky”, I’m the one giving the counseling.
anniekc on February 28, 2009 at 7:17 PM
Laura is a recent cancer survivor, probably unable to have children after treatment. She has adopted a child.
Cindy Munford on February 28, 2009 at 7:18 PM
Obama is my Resident..
right4life on February 28, 2009 at 7:18 PM
HI April!!!
jerrytbg on February 28, 2009 at 7:18 PM
I’ve heard credible reports that Ann Coulter is a transexual – she used to me a man. Just look at her Adam’s Apple.
Atlanta Voter on February 28, 2009 at 7:18 PM
you do know Buckley and Rush were great friends, Buckley mentored Rush…
right4life on February 28, 2009 at 7:19 PM
oooo…troll heaven !!!
jerrytbg on February 28, 2009 at 7:20 PM
Comment pages: « Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 Next »