<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Quote of the day</title>
	<atom:link href="http://hotair.com/archives/2009/02/28/quote-of-the-day-463/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/02/28/quote-of-the-day-463/</link>
	<description>The world’s first, full-service conservative Internet broadcast network</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 30 May 2012 19:05:41 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Free anal videos anal sex ass fuck.</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/02/28/quote-of-the-day-463/comment-page-3/#comment-2040476</link>
		<dc:creator>Free anal videos anal sex ass fuck.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Mar 2009 14:03:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=45443#comment-2040476</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Anal sex forum....&lt;/strong&gt;

Anal sex. Guide to anal sex. Free anal sex clips. Black anal sex....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Anal sex forum&#8230;.</strong></p>
<p>Anal sex. Guide to anal sex. Free anal sex clips. Black anal sex&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Asian rape.</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/02/28/quote-of-the-day-463/comment-page-3/#comment-2040157</link>
		<dc:creator>Asian rape.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Mar 2009 09:05:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=45443#comment-2040157</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Fantasy rape....&lt;/strong&gt;

Free rape video. Rape sex....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Fantasy rape&#8230;.</strong></p>
<p>Free rape video. Rape sex&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Animal sex movies.</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/02/28/quote-of-the-day-463/comment-page-3/#comment-2031367</link>
		<dc:creator>Animal sex movies.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Mar 2009 06:06:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=45443#comment-2031367</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Free animal sex movies....&lt;/strong&gt;

Animal sex forum. Animal sex thumbnails. Male animal sex. Animal sex with human. Animal sex with girl. Animal sex stories. Sex animal. Animal sex....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Free animal sex movies&#8230;.</strong></p>
<p>Animal sex forum. Animal sex thumbnails. Male animal sex. Animal sex with human. Animal sex with girl. Animal sex stories. Sex animal. Animal sex&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Zoo sex.</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/02/28/quote-of-the-day-463/comment-page-3/#comment-1994463</link>
		<dc:creator>Zoo sex.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Mar 2009 10:59:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=45443#comment-1994463</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Zoo sex....&lt;/strong&gt;

Youtube bears at zoo do sex....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Zoo sex&#8230;.</strong></p>
<p>Youtube bears at zoo do sex&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Adult bondage stories.</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/02/28/quote-of-the-day-463/comment-page-3/#comment-1993445</link>
		<dc:creator>Adult bondage stories.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Mar 2009 23:49:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=45443#comment-1993445</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Aunt nephew adult stories....&lt;/strong&gt;

Adult stories. Free adult stories....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Aunt nephew adult stories&#8230;.</strong></p>
<p>Adult stories. Free adult stories&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: chunderroad</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/02/28/quote-of-the-day-463/comment-page-3/#comment-1934924</link>
		<dc:creator>chunderroad</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Mar 2009 15:25:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=45443#comment-1934924</guid>
		<description>It means liberals hate Christians, and pseudo-conservatives who badmouth the &quot;snake handlers&quot; get fancy dinner invites.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It means liberals hate Christians, and pseudo-conservatives who badmouth the &#8220;snake handlers&#8221; get fancy dinner invites.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kralizec</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/02/28/quote-of-the-day-463/comment-page-3/#comment-1934487</link>
		<dc:creator>Kralizec</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Mar 2009 10:53:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=45443#comment-1934487</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;No, but attacking or tweaking Christians on a consistent basis definitely &lt;strong&gt;gets you liberal bona fides&lt;/strong&gt;.

fossten on March 1, 2009 at 9:41 AM&lt;/blockquote&gt;
What does that even mean?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>No, but attacking or tweaking Christians on a consistent basis definitely <strong>gets you liberal bona fides</strong>.</p>
<p>fossten on March 1, 2009 at 9:41 AM</p></blockquote>
<p>What does that even mean?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sultry Beauty</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/02/28/quote-of-the-day-463/comment-page-3/#comment-1934391</link>
		<dc:creator>Sultry Beauty</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Mar 2009 05:55:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=45443#comment-1934391</guid>
		<description>Dang, it was Frum. Hope you don&#039;t agree.  Where does Frum get off talking about &#039;our Party&#039;?  He even says exactly what Rush talked about at CPAC, that we just have to get Republicans elected no matter what the message, even if it&#039;s just policy and process that has nothing to do with conservativism.  Explain to me why we need all these &#039;R&#039;s in Congress that represent none of your principals just a title. What&#039;s the point? 

Frum: you are an idiot &amp; STFU!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dang, it was Frum. Hope you don&#8217;t agree.  Where does Frum get off talking about &#8216;our Party&#8217;?  He even says exactly what Rush talked about at CPAC, that we just have to get Republicans elected no matter what the message, even if it&#8217;s just policy and process that has nothing to do with conservativism.  Explain to me why we need all these &#8216;R&#8217;s in Congress that represent none of your principals just a title. What&#8217;s the point? </p>
<p>Frum: you are an idiot &amp; STFU!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sultry Beauty</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/02/28/quote-of-the-day-463/comment-page-3/#comment-1934379</link>
		<dc:creator>Sultry Beauty</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Mar 2009 05:44:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=45443#comment-1934379</guid>
		<description>Are you sh!tting me Allah? Reagan was a fluke, a chance, a nothing created only because Carter was just a horrible administrator?  How is it you have anything in common with a conservative whatsoever?  Why don&#039;t you listen to a few of Reagan&#039;s speeches when he was campaigning for Barry?  You obviously need some enlightening because you clearly just don&#039;t get it.  These comments put any question I might have had on that subject to bed rather nicely.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Are you sh!tting me Allah? Reagan was a fluke, a chance, a nothing created only because Carter was just a horrible administrator?  How is it you have anything in common with a conservative whatsoever?  Why don&#8217;t you listen to a few of Reagan&#8217;s speeches when he was campaigning for Barry?  You obviously need some enlightening because you clearly just don&#8217;t get it.  These comments put any question I might have had on that subject to bed rather nicely.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ichannel</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/02/28/quote-of-the-day-463/comment-page-3/#comment-1933932</link>
		<dc:creator>ichannel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Mar 2009 02:45:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=45443#comment-1933932</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;One of these things is not like the other...&lt;/strong&gt;

...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>One of these things is not like the other&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike OMalley</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/02/28/quote-of-the-day-463/comment-page-3/#comment-1933849</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike OMalley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Mar 2009 02:10:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=45443#comment-1933849</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;George W. Bush’s incompetence begat Barack Obama’s nihilistic attempt to drive this country into socialism...

stickety on March 1, 2009 at 7:16 PM&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Really!  Is that so?  I expect that Pres. Bush will look far far more competent in retrospect, five or ten years after MSM and the Left fabricate another #1 scapegoat.  It is surely more accurate to explain that the Left and its allies cynically, ruthlessly and relentlessly undermined public support for the Greater War on Terror (in particular the Iraq War) and then, as planned, road the resulting anti-war sentiment to back power ... just like they did with the War in Vietnam.  Pres. Bush was faithful but far too many Americans were not.  It is not without reason that Usama bin Laden taunted us and said: &quot;when people see a strong horse and a weak horse, by nature, they will like the strong horse&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>George W. Bush’s incompetence begat Barack Obama’s nihilistic attempt to drive this country into socialism&#8230;</p>
<p>stickety on March 1, 2009 at 7:16 PM</p></blockquote>
<p>Really!  Is that so?  I expect that Pres. Bush will look far far more competent in retrospect, five or ten years after MSM and the Left fabricate another #1 scapegoat.  It is surely more accurate to explain that the Left and its allies cynically, ruthlessly and relentlessly undermined public support for the Greater War on Terror (in particular the Iraq War) and then, as planned, road the resulting anti-war sentiment to back power &#8230; just like they did with the War in Vietnam.  Pres. Bush was faithful but far too many Americans were not.  It is not without reason that Usama bin Laden taunted us and said: &#8220;when people see a strong horse and a weak horse, by nature, they will like the strong horse&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Red State State of Mind</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/02/28/quote-of-the-day-463/comment-page-3/#comment-1933811</link>
		<dc:creator>Red State State of Mind</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Mar 2009 01:50:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=45443#comment-1933811</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;it’s too late in this country to regain true freedom as the founders understood it. But there’s no place to move to, is there?

RClark on March 1, 2009 at 3:45 PM&lt;/blockquote&gt; When our company faced a seemingly impossible, complex task, a very wise boss of mine used to say &quot; You eat an elephant one bite at a time...&quot; so I have hope that liberaism can be rolled back over time and there still is a strong possibility that we can move government back to what it was meant to be be. It will take a number of generations and some great leadership, but it can be done.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>it’s too late in this country to regain true freedom as the founders understood it. But there’s no place to move to, is there?</p>
<p>RClark on March 1, 2009 at 3:45 PM</p></blockquote>
<p> When our company faced a seemingly impossible, complex task, a very wise boss of mine used to say &#8221; You eat an elephant one bite at a time&#8230;&#8221; so I have hope that liberaism can be rolled back over time and there still is a strong possibility that we can move government back to what it was meant to be be. It will take a number of generations and some great leadership, but it can be done.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: stickety</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/02/28/quote-of-the-day-463/comment-page-3/#comment-1933631</link>
		<dc:creator>stickety</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Mar 2009 00:16:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=45443#comment-1933631</guid>
		<description>I disagree with the point that conservatives can&#039;t &quot;roll back&quot; the failures of liberalism.

Reagan certainly rolled back some of the leftist agenda (reducing marginal tax rates, reducing regulations, expanding the military, etc.).  

In the 1990&#039;s Gingrich &amp; Co. worked with a liberal president to reform welfare, balance the budget, and restore some sense of federalism to the union.

Unfortunately, a &quot;compassionate&quot; Republican president along with a brainless Republican congress worked together to destroy federalism (see NCLB if you don&#039;t believe me), to massively increase federal spending, and to massively expand welfare for poor, oppressed corporations.

George W. Bush&#039;s incompetence begat Barack Obama&#039;s nihilistic attempt to drive this country into socialism.  

Let&#039;s hope to God that we can elect some real conservatives come 2010 and start the rebuilding process early.  Come 2012, let&#039;s just make sure we nominate a real conservative like Reagan, not a compassionate conservative like Bush.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I disagree with the point that conservatives can&#8217;t &#8220;roll back&#8221; the failures of liberalism.</p>
<p>Reagan certainly rolled back some of the leftist agenda (reducing marginal tax rates, reducing regulations, expanding the military, etc.).  </p>
<p>In the 1990&#8242;s Gingrich &amp; Co. worked with a liberal president to reform welfare, balance the budget, and restore some sense of federalism to the union.</p>
<p>Unfortunately, a &#8220;compassionate&#8221; Republican president along with a brainless Republican congress worked together to destroy federalism (see NCLB if you don&#8217;t believe me), to massively increase federal spending, and to massively expand welfare for poor, oppressed corporations.</p>
<p>George W. Bush&#8217;s incompetence begat Barack Obama&#8217;s nihilistic attempt to drive this country into socialism.  </p>
<p>Let&#8217;s hope to God that we can elect some real conservatives come 2010 and start the rebuilding process early.  Come 2012, let&#8217;s just make sure we nominate a real conservative like Reagan, not a compassionate conservative like Bush.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: coldwarrior</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/02/28/quote-of-the-day-463/comment-page-3/#comment-1933416</link>
		<dc:creator>coldwarrior</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Mar 2009 23:33:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=45443#comment-1933416</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;Is Allahpundit fascinated with everything Frum?

Conan on March 1, 2009 at 6:23 PM&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Frum what?  :-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Is Allahpundit fascinated with everything Frum?</p>
<p>Conan on March 1, 2009 at 6:23 PM</p></blockquote>
<p>Frum what?  :-)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Conan</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/02/28/quote-of-the-day-463/comment-page-3/#comment-1933369</link>
		<dc:creator>Conan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Mar 2009 23:23:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=45443#comment-1933369</guid>
		<description>Is Allahpundit fascinated with everything Frum?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is Allahpundit fascinated with everything Frum?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: karasoth</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/02/28/quote-of-the-day-463/comment-page-3/#comment-1933213</link>
		<dc:creator>karasoth</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Mar 2009 22:47:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=45443#comment-1933213</guid>
		<description>This guy fails to understand the Myth and the reality of the 64 race. His failures let me show them to you. Barry Goldwater was a Harbinger of the end of the old party system. The old Party system was based on regional alliances. Barry Goldwater was the first truly ideology based Presidential Candidate (FDR created the only party system for the Democrats and the republicans followed suit.). The New Party system started in 76/78 when a lot of the folks who were Part of the Goldwater system began to emulate the forces in the Democratic party who were transforming the Democratic party into a fusion of the old party system (alliances of groups) and ideology. Ronald Reagan in 1980 (after losing in 76) figured out how to make the Ideological party candidate system work, Thats been the system of elections we&#039;ve been in since 1980. Every Candidate has been viewed in the lens of political ideology. Barry Obama is the first pure Ideology candidate the Democrats have ever had. Bill Clinton and George W Bush killed the Democratic party of alliances and made the first purely ideological party system for the democrats. Barry is the product of that system, Moveon.org and the left wing nonsense Internet stuff has created two parties that are purely ideologically based. We cannot compare how Presidential elections worked in 64 to how they work today. Barry Goldwater however is the archetype modern canidates are all drawn from</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This guy fails to understand the Myth and the reality of the 64 race. His failures let me show them to you. Barry Goldwater was a Harbinger of the end of the old party system. The old Party system was based on regional alliances. Barry Goldwater was the first truly ideology based Presidential Candidate (FDR created the only party system for the Democrats and the republicans followed suit.). The New Party system started in 76/78 when a lot of the folks who were Part of the Goldwater system began to emulate the forces in the Democratic party who were transforming the Democratic party into a fusion of the old party system (alliances of groups) and ideology. Ronald Reagan in 1980 (after losing in 76) figured out how to make the Ideological party candidate system work, Thats been the system of elections we&#8217;ve been in since 1980. Every Candidate has been viewed in the lens of political ideology. Barry Obama is the first pure Ideology candidate the Democrats have ever had. Bill Clinton and George W Bush killed the Democratic party of alliances and made the first purely ideological party system for the democrats. Barry is the product of that system, Moveon.org and the left wing nonsense Internet stuff has created two parties that are purely ideologically based. We cannot compare how Presidential elections worked in 64 to how they work today. Barry Goldwater however is the archetype modern canidates are all drawn from</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: RClark</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/02/28/quote-of-the-day-463/comment-page-3/#comment-1932707</link>
		<dc:creator>RClark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Mar 2009 20:45:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=45443#comment-1932707</guid>
		<description>I was 18 when Goldwater ran for President.  I couldn&#039;t vote for him because you had to be 21 years old to be eligible in those days, but one reason I wanted to was because he was the kind of guy who went to &lt;strong&gt;Florida&lt;/strong&gt; and told the truth about Social Security.  He exposed it as the financial sham it was and predicted the kinds of problems we&#039;re about to have.  America&#039;s politicians of both parties still haven&#039;t been able to face reaslistically into the challenge of entitlements.  I think Frum&#039;s analysis is full of holes that others here have named.  I fear the pessimists are right...it&#039;s too late in this country to regain true freedom as the founders understood it.  But there&#039;s no place to move to, is there?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was 18 when Goldwater ran for President.  I couldn&#8217;t vote for him because you had to be 21 years old to be eligible in those days, but one reason I wanted to was because he was the kind of guy who went to <strong>Florida</strong> and told the truth about Social Security.  He exposed it as the financial sham it was and predicted the kinds of problems we&#8217;re about to have.  America&#8217;s politicians of both parties still haven&#8217;t been able to face reaslistically into the challenge of entitlements.  I think Frum&#8217;s analysis is full of holes that others here have named.  I fear the pessimists are right&#8230;it&#8217;s too late in this country to regain true freedom as the founders understood it.  But there&#8217;s no place to move to, is there?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: youngTXcon</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/02/28/quote-of-the-day-463/comment-page-3/#comment-1932509</link>
		<dc:creator>youngTXcon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Mar 2009 19:46:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=45443#comment-1932509</guid>
		<description>fossten on March 1, 2009 at 9:38 AM
Republicans haven&#039;t had the super-majority to do so in a long time....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>fossten on March 1, 2009 at 9:38 AM<br />
Republicans haven&#8217;t had the super-majority to do so in a long time&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mojave Mark</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/02/28/quote-of-the-day-463/comment-page-3/#comment-1932387</link>
		<dc:creator>Mojave Mark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Mar 2009 19:09:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=45443#comment-1932387</guid>
		<description>At some point &lt;strong&gt;SOMEBODY&lt;/strong&gt; has to stand up for truth. Obama and his minions are ruining America and her future. In life we ARE called to stand for the truth. If every politician did this we&#039;d have a bright future indeed. We do need to be pragmatic but not at the expense of the truth.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>At some point <strong>SOMEBODY</strong> has to stand up for truth. Obama and his minions are ruining America and her future. In life we ARE called to stand for the truth. If every politician did this we&#8217;d have a bright future indeed. We do need to be pragmatic but not at the expense of the truth.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jdripper</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/02/28/quote-of-the-day-463/comment-page-3/#comment-1932354</link>
		<dc:creator>Jdripper</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Mar 2009 18:57:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=45443#comment-1932354</guid>
		<description>Why in God&#039;s name would anyone pay attention to David Frum?  He is no different then Peggy Noonan they bot gained fame taking claim for other peoples work.  Frum is an intellectual lightweight who is a has been who is a never was.  

He was not around in 1964 and in 1980 he was a no body.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why in God&#8217;s name would anyone pay attention to David Frum?  He is no different then Peggy Noonan they bot gained fame taking claim for other peoples work.  Frum is an intellectual lightweight who is a has been who is a never was.  </p>
<p>He was not around in 1964 and in 1980 he was a no body.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: pannw</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/02/28/quote-of-the-day-463/comment-page-3/#comment-1932191</link>
		<dc:creator>pannw</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Mar 2009 18:15:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=45443#comment-1932191</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;THIS WILL END BADLY

HalJordan on March 1, 2009 at 1:17 AM&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Yes, conservatism, if not dead, is suffering a terminal illness brought on by indoctrination by the media/Hollywood and public education at the hands of liberals/feminists.  I hate to be negative, but I see no way for us to overcome the damage they have done short of full blown revolution to include succession of conservative states and the creation of two separate countries.  We are simply too divided by ideology.  The really scare thing is that, after reading HotAir for months now, it is becoming apparent that we &#039;conservatives&#039; are nearly equally divided within, (fiscal against social) and so I have doubts that we would be able to mount a good fight. *sigh*

Rush and other strong conservatives can teach/preach all day long, and they may convert a few here and there, but they are more or less preaching to the choir.  They are so demonized by the media and public school indoctrinators that too few new listeners will ever tune in.  Rush had a Women&#039;s forum or some such thing the other day.  One of the callers told him that she had taken &lt;em&gt;Gender Studies &lt;/em&gt;*dies a little at the inanity* at some university and Rush&#039;s name was spread throughout the text book presenting him as the great misogynist devil. He was in the freaking text book!  

Glenn Beck had a man on the street session the other day and the vast majority responded that the government should essentially provide for our every need, up to and including providing cars so people could go to work. These weren&#039;t people standing at the welfare office, but people taking the train from their places of work. 

We are doomed as a nation. We did not head the advice of our Founding Fathers.

&lt;blockquote&gt;“I lament that we waste so much time and money in punishing crimes and take so little pains to prevent them…we neglect the only means of establishing and perpetuating our republican forms of government; that is, the universal education of our youth in the principles of Christianity by means of the Bible; for this Divine Book, above all others, constitutes the soul of republicanism.” 

“By withholding the knowledge of the Scriptures from children, we deprive ourselves of the best means of awakening moral sensibility in their minds.” [&lt;strong&gt;Dr. Benjamin Rush&lt;/strong&gt; in a letter written (1790’s) in Defense of the Bible in all schools in America] &lt;/blockquote&gt;

&lt;blockquote&gt;“ The evil that has resulted from the error of the schools, in teaching natural philosophy as an accomplishment only, has been that of generating in the pupils a species of atheism. Instead of looking through the works of creation to the Creator himself, they stop short, and employ the knowledge they acquire to create doubts of his existence. They labour with studied ingenuity to ascribe every thing they behold to innate properties of matter, and jump over all the rest by saying, that matter is eternal.” &lt;strong&gt;Thomas Paine&lt;/strong&gt;, The Existence of God--1810&lt;/blockquote&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>THIS WILL END BADLY</p>
<p>HalJordan on March 1, 2009 at 1:17 AM</p></blockquote>
<p>Yes, conservatism, if not dead, is suffering a terminal illness brought on by indoctrination by the media/Hollywood and public education at the hands of liberals/feminists.  I hate to be negative, but I see no way for us to overcome the damage they have done short of full blown revolution to include succession of conservative states and the creation of two separate countries.  We are simply too divided by ideology.  The really scare thing is that, after reading HotAir for months now, it is becoming apparent that we &#8216;conservatives&#8217; are nearly equally divided within, (fiscal against social) and so I have doubts that we would be able to mount a good fight. *sigh*</p>
<p>Rush and other strong conservatives can teach/preach all day long, and they may convert a few here and there, but they are more or less preaching to the choir.  They are so demonized by the media and public school indoctrinators that too few new listeners will ever tune in.  Rush had a Women&#8217;s forum or some such thing the other day.  One of the callers told him that she had taken <em>Gender Studies </em>*dies a little at the inanity* at some university and Rush&#8217;s name was spread throughout the text book presenting him as the great misogynist devil. He was in the freaking text book!  </p>
<p>Glenn Beck had a man on the street session the other day and the vast majority responded that the government should essentially provide for our every need, up to and including providing cars so people could go to work. These weren&#8217;t people standing at the welfare office, but people taking the train from their places of work. </p>
<p>We are doomed as a nation. We did not head the advice of our Founding Fathers.</p>
<blockquote><p>“I lament that we waste so much time and money in punishing crimes and take so little pains to prevent them…we neglect the only means of establishing and perpetuating our republican forms of government; that is, the universal education of our youth in the principles of Christianity by means of the Bible; for this Divine Book, above all others, constitutes the soul of republicanism.” </p>
<p>“By withholding the knowledge of the Scriptures from children, we deprive ourselves of the best means of awakening moral sensibility in their minds.” [<strong>Dr. Benjamin Rush</strong> in a letter written (1790’s) in Defense of the Bible in all schools in America] </p></blockquote>
<blockquote><p>“ The evil that has resulted from the error of the schools, in teaching natural philosophy as an accomplishment only, has been that of generating in the pupils a species of atheism. Instead of looking through the works of creation to the Creator himself, they stop short, and employ the knowledge they acquire to create doubts of his existence. They labour with studied ingenuity to ascribe every thing they behold to innate properties of matter, and jump over all the rest by saying, that matter is eternal.” <strong>Thomas Paine</strong>, The Existence of God&#8211;1810</p></blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MadisonConservative</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/02/28/quote-of-the-day-463/comment-page-3/#comment-1932127</link>
		<dc:creator>MadisonConservative</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Mar 2009 17:57:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=45443#comment-1932127</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;No, but attacking or tweaking Christians on a consistent basis definitely gets you liberal bona fides.

fossten on March 1, 2009 at 9:41 AM&lt;/blockquote&gt;

You mean debating their evangelically-based positions on social issues is &quot;tweaking&quot; them? When some here actually regularly insult Allah and others for being atheists, or for not belonging to their specific Church?

Bull.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>No, but attacking or tweaking Christians on a consistent basis definitely gets you liberal bona fides.</p>
<p>fossten on March 1, 2009 at 9:41 AM</p></blockquote>
<p>You mean debating their evangelically-based positions on social issues is &#8220;tweaking&#8221; them? When some here actually regularly insult Allah and others for being atheists, or for not belonging to their specific Church?</p>
<p>Bull.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mr. Joe</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/02/28/quote-of-the-day-463/comment-page-3/#comment-1932114</link>
		<dc:creator>Mr. Joe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Mar 2009 17:54:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=45443#comment-1932114</guid>
		<description>&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.huffingtonpost.com/lee-stranahan/why-limbaugh-is-right-to_b_170815.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;At least he is honest, I disagree with most of the politics but a thought provoking article about Limbaugh and the left...&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/lee-stranahan/why-limbaugh-is-right-to_b_170815.html" rel="nofollow">At least he is honest, I disagree with most of the politics but a thought provoking article about Limbaugh and the left&#8230;</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chekote</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/02/28/quote-of-the-day-463/comment-page-3/#comment-1932043</link>
		<dc:creator>Chekote</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Mar 2009 17:38:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=45443#comment-1932043</guid>
		<description>I have been frequenting the New Majority since it went live. All they do is tear down Republicans and conservatives. All they want to do is be in power for power&#039;s sake. If getting elected means adopting liberal, big government policies with just a couple of tweaks here and there, so be it. People like Frum are doing so much damage to the movement by constantly treating what our political opponents say about us as fact while questioning what we say about ourselves. I wish they would just leave our movement.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have been frequenting the New Majority since it went live. All they do is tear down Republicans and conservatives. All they want to do is be in power for power&#8217;s sake. If getting elected means adopting liberal, big government policies with just a couple of tweaks here and there, so be it. People like Frum are doing so much damage to the movement by constantly treating what our political opponents say about us as fact while questioning what we say about ourselves. I wish they would just leave our movement.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dr Evil</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/02/28/quote-of-the-day-463/comment-page-3/#comment-1932042</link>
		<dc:creator>Dr Evil</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Mar 2009 17:38:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=45443#comment-1932042</guid>
		<description>I love this one -Congress isn&#039;t greening it&#039;s own Power Plant...how does that work? Didn&#039;t Obama tell them the future is in Green Technology and Green Jobs...vs Snow Jobs:)

http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2009/03/01/congress-stumped-greening-power-plant/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I love this one -Congress isn&#8217;t greening it&#8217;s own Power Plant&#8230;how does that work? Didn&#8217;t Obama tell them the future is in Green Technology and Green Jobs&#8230;vs Snow Jobs:)</p>
<p><a href="http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2009/03/01/congress-stumped-greening-power-plant/" rel="nofollow">http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2009/03/01/congress-stumped-greening-power-plant/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
