<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: 87-11: Senate passes DeMint amendment to ban Fairness Doctrine</title>
	<atom:link href="http://hotair.com/archives/2009/02/26/87-11-senate-passes-demint-amendment-to-ban-fairness-doctrine/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/02/26/87-11-senate-passes-demint-amendment-to-ban-fairness-doctrine/</link>
	<description>The world’s first, full-service conservative Internet broadcast network</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 29 May 2012 22:03:57 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Radio Vice Online</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/02/26/87-11-senate-passes-demint-amendment-to-ban-fairness-doctrine/comment-page-1/#comment-2494769</link>
		<dc:creator>Radio Vice Online</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Jul 2009 20:42:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=45239#comment-2494769</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Senate votes to prevent Fairness Doctrine, but&#8230;...&lt;/strong&gt;

Within the last couple of hours, the United States Senate approved an amendment that would outlaw the Fairness Doctrine. The amendment passed by a wide margin, with only 11 senators voting against.
But, another amendment that could effectively cause th...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Senate votes to prevent Fairness Doctrine, but&#8230;&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>Within the last couple of hours, the United States Senate approved an amendment that would outlaw the Fairness Doctrine. The amendment passed by a wide margin, with only 11 senators voting against.<br />
But, another amendment that could effectively cause th&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Radio Vice Online</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/02/26/87-11-senate-passes-demint-amendment-to-ban-fairness-doctrine/comment-page-1/#comment-2494770</link>
		<dc:creator>Radio Vice Online</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Jul 2009 20:42:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=45239#comment-2494770</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Senate votes to prevent Fairness Doctrine, but&#8230;...&lt;/strong&gt;

Within the last couple of hours, the United States Senate approved an amendment that would outlaw the Fairness Doctrine. The amendment passed by a wide margin, with only 11 senators voting against.
But, another amendment that could effectively cause th...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Senate votes to prevent Fairness Doctrine, but&#8230;&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>Within the last couple of hours, the United States Senate approved an amendment that would outlaw the Fairness Doctrine. The amendment passed by a wide margin, with only 11 senators voting against.<br />
But, another amendment that could effectively cause th&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Christine</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/02/26/87-11-senate-passes-demint-amendment-to-ban-fairness-doctrine/comment-page-1/#comment-1927168</link>
		<dc:creator>Christine</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Feb 2009 18:26:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=45239#comment-1927168</guid>
		<description>Again, we are seeing brazen tactics by the Demos while the Repubs are actually doing something but are ultimately, neutered. How long can we take this jaw-dropping coup?

I agree with this: &quot;Stop posting. Start organizing - it’s almost too late.&quot;
Thank you Dorvillian. I&#039;m wasting my time here.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Again, we are seeing brazen tactics by the Demos while the Repubs are actually doing something but are ultimately, neutered. How long can we take this jaw-dropping coup?</p>
<p>I agree with this: &#8220;Stop posting. Start organizing &#8211; it’s almost too late.&#8221;<br />
Thank you Dorvillian. I&#8217;m wasting my time here.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Commentary &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Flotsam and Jetsam</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/02/26/87-11-senate-passes-demint-amendment-to-ban-fairness-doctrine/comment-page-1/#comment-1925870</link>
		<dc:creator>Commentary &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Flotsam and Jetsam</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Feb 2009 13:07:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=45239#comment-1925870</guid>
		<description>[...] bipartisanship: 87 Senators oppose the Fairness [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] bipartisanship: 87 Senators oppose the Fairness [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The News Factor: News, opinion, current events &#8212; a rewarding news experience &#187; Blog Archive</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/02/26/87-11-senate-passes-demint-amendment-to-ban-fairness-doctrine/comment-page-1/#comment-1925724</link>
		<dc:creator>The News Factor: News, opinion, current events &#8212; a rewarding news experience &#187; Blog Archive</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Feb 2009 06:34:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=45239#comment-1925724</guid>
		<description>[...] ► Department of Homeland Security is ready if the violence in Mexico spills over into the United States ► GOOD NEWS, SORT OF: 87-11: Senate passes DeMint amendment to ban Fairness Doctrine [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] ► Department of Homeland Security is ready if the violence in Mexico spills over into the United States ► GOOD NEWS, SORT OF: 87-11: Senate passes DeMint amendment to ban Fairness Doctrine [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cromagnum</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/02/26/87-11-senate-passes-demint-amendment-to-ban-fairness-doctrine/comment-page-1/#comment-1925474</link>
		<dc:creator>Cromagnum</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Feb 2009 04:16:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=45239#comment-1925474</guid>
		<description>When do we bring our muzzle loaders to the Hill?

All in fairness when we get a Tax from the 
King.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When do we bring our muzzle loaders to the Hill?</p>
<p>All in fairness when we get a Tax from the<br />
King.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Marxist Doctrine news &#171; The Daley Gator</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/02/26/87-11-senate-passes-demint-amendment-to-ban-fairness-doctrine/comment-page-1/#comment-1925307</link>
		<dc:creator>Marxist Doctrine news &#171; The Daley Gator</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Feb 2009 03:29:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=45239#comment-1925307</guid>
		<description>[...] Marxist Doctrine&#160;news  A win! And A loss! [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Marxist Doctrine&nbsp;news  A win! And A loss! [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: OneGyT</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/02/26/87-11-senate-passes-demint-amendment-to-ban-fairness-doctrine/comment-page-1/#comment-1925259</link>
		<dc:creator>OneGyT</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Feb 2009 03:10:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=45239#comment-1925259</guid>
		<description>Nice. &quot;Senate passes ban on Fairness Doctrine. In related news, Senate passes Fairness Doctrine.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice. &#8220;Senate passes ban on Fairness Doctrine. In related news, Senate passes Fairness Doctrine.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Senate Against-And For Fairness Doctrine &#171;</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/02/26/87-11-senate-passes-demint-amendment-to-ban-fairness-doctrine/comment-page-1/#comment-1925218</link>
		<dc:creator>Senate Against-And For Fairness Doctrine &#171;</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Feb 2009 02:58:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=45239#comment-1925218</guid>
		<description>[...] it politicians once again not reading what they&#8217;re voting for, but the Senate has managed to pass an amendment that would bar the FCC from reinstituting the fairness [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] it politicians once again not reading what they&#8217;re voting for, but the Senate has managed to pass an amendment that would bar the FCC from reinstituting the fairness [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: onlineanalyst</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/02/26/87-11-senate-passes-demint-amendment-to-ban-fairness-doctrine/comment-page-1/#comment-1925124</link>
		<dc:creator>onlineanalyst</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Feb 2009 02:25:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=45239#comment-1925124</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;Republicans have introduced the Broadcaster Freedom Act in the House as well, but Democrats are not expected to allow a vote on the bill…
That just about says it all. The Democrats then pass Durbin’s bill to&lt;strong&gt;&lt;/strong&gt; “encourage and promote diversity in communication media ownership, and to ensure that the public airwaves are used in the public interest.”

Yet they won’t “allow a vote” on a Republican bill. 

Which is what the Democrats intend, I am sure, in that Durbin language: “the public interest” and what is in that as to “diversity” is what the Left says it will be, apparently because, otherwise, why the language in that Durbin bill…

This is not a done-deal. I’m actually more concerned about that snip from the Durbin bill than earlier about the Unfairness Doctrine itself.

Lourdes on February 26, 2009 at 5:05 PM&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Precisely!  BTW Does the bolded section above from Durbin&#039;s bill mean that federal funds will be used to &quot;promote and encourage&quot;-- sort of like having ACORN or CRA on the airwaves?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Republicans have introduced the Broadcaster Freedom Act in the House as well, but Democrats are not expected to allow a vote on the bill…<br />
That just about says it all. The Democrats then pass Durbin’s bill to<strong></strong> “encourage and promote diversity in communication media ownership, and to ensure that the public airwaves are used in the public interest.”</p>
<p>Yet they won’t “allow a vote” on a Republican bill. </p>
<p>Which is what the Democrats intend, I am sure, in that Durbin language: “the public interest” and what is in that as to “diversity” is what the Left says it will be, apparently because, otherwise, why the language in that Durbin bill…</p>
<p>This is not a done-deal. I’m actually more concerned about that snip from the Durbin bill than earlier about the Unfairness Doctrine itself.</p>
<p>Lourdes on February 26, 2009 at 5:05 PM</p></blockquote>
<p>Precisely!  BTW Does the bolded section above from Durbin&#8217;s bill mean that federal funds will be used to &#8220;promote and encourage&#8221;&#8211; sort of like having ACORN or CRA on the airwaves?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: heshtesh</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/02/26/87-11-senate-passes-demint-amendment-to-ban-fairness-doctrine/comment-page-1/#comment-1925065</link>
		<dc:creator>heshtesh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Feb 2009 02:05:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=45239#comment-1925065</guid>
		<description>As we are on the suject of free speech you might want to check out this site The Obama forum.com what a treat this lot is.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As we are on the suject of free speech you might want to check out this site The Obama forum.com what a treat this lot is.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ynot4tony2</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/02/26/87-11-senate-passes-demint-amendment-to-ban-fairness-doctrine/comment-page-1/#comment-1925003</link>
		<dc:creator>ynot4tony2</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Feb 2009 01:50:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=45239#comment-1925003</guid>
		<description>Anyone want to guess how Al Franken would have voted, had he *shudder* been seated as a Senator?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Anyone want to guess how Al Franken would have voted, had he *shudder* been seated as a Senator?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dorvillian</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/02/26/87-11-senate-passes-demint-amendment-to-ban-fairness-doctrine/comment-page-1/#comment-1924992</link>
		<dc:creator>Dorvillian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Feb 2009 01:47:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=45239#comment-1924992</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;Like the boss says, the fight’s not over.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

No. It&#039;s over. Didn&#039;t you hear? We lost.

We lost pretty much everything, and it&#039;ll probably not be coming back for quite some time.

I guess writing and commenting on posts is a nice diversion, but it accomplishes nothing.

If the fight is indeed not over, I think it&#039;s time to start dipping some old t-shirts into glass containers filled with flammable liquids, or stock up on tar &amp; feathers, hell I&#039;d even settle for a good old fashioned demonstration of pitchforks.
&lt;strong&gt;
Stop posting. Start organizing - &lt;em&gt;it&#039;s almost too late.&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Like the boss says, the fight’s not over.</p></blockquote>
<p>No. It&#8217;s over. Didn&#8217;t you hear? We lost.</p>
<p>We lost pretty much everything, and it&#8217;ll probably not be coming back for quite some time.</p>
<p>I guess writing and commenting on posts is a nice diversion, but it accomplishes nothing.</p>
<p>If the fight is indeed not over, I think it&#8217;s time to start dipping some old t-shirts into glass containers filled with flammable liquids, or stock up on tar &amp; feathers, hell I&#8217;d even settle for a good old fashioned demonstration of pitchforks.<br />
<strong><br />
Stop posting. Start organizing &#8211; <em>it&#8217;s almost too late.</em></strong></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rovin</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/02/26/87-11-senate-passes-demint-amendment-to-ban-fairness-doctrine/comment-page-1/#comment-1924885</link>
		<dc:creator>Rovin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Feb 2009 01:17:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=45239#comment-1924885</guid>
		<description>The loss of our freedom of speech will be buried appropriately in an earmark.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The loss of our freedom of speech will be buried appropriately in an earmark.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: silverfox</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/02/26/87-11-senate-passes-demint-amendment-to-ban-fairness-doctrine/comment-page-1/#comment-1924798</link>
		<dc:creator>silverfox</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Feb 2009 00:54:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=45239#comment-1924798</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;And I thought Feinstein was the more sensible one.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

You should put &lt;em&gt;sensible&lt;/em&gt; in quotes though.
Feinstein said invading Iraq was not different than invading an ally like Portugal.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>And I thought Feinstein was the more sensible one.</p></blockquote>
<p>You should put <em>sensible</em> in quotes though.<br />
Feinstein said invading Iraq was not different than invading an ally like Portugal.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: silverfox</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/02/26/87-11-senate-passes-demint-amendment-to-ban-fairness-doctrine/comment-page-1/#comment-1924786</link>
		<dc:creator>silverfox</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Feb 2009 00:52:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=45239#comment-1924786</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;Boxer voted Yea?!!

And I thought Feinstein was the more sensible one.

eaglescout1998 on February 26, 2009 at 6:37 PM
&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Beat me to it, ES.  Was going to post the same thing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Boxer voted Yea?!!</p>
<p>And I thought Feinstein was the more sensible one.</p>
<p>eaglescout1998 on February 26, 2009 at 6:37 PM
</p></blockquote>
<p>Beat me to it, ES.  Was going to post the same thing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mr. Pickles</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/02/26/87-11-senate-passes-demint-amendment-to-ban-fairness-doctrine/comment-page-1/#comment-1924751</link>
		<dc:creator>Mr. Pickles</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Feb 2009 00:33:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=45239#comment-1924751</guid>
		<description>My prediction:  in 2 or 3 years time, the federal gov&#039;t will pass a massive bailout of the left-wing radio station owners who, like all left wing talkers before them, failed to make successful radio businesses, even though they were handed prime AM frequencies which were confiscated, in the name of public interest, from their previous conservative talk radio licensees.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My prediction:  in 2 or 3 years time, the federal gov&#8217;t will pass a massive bailout of the left-wing radio station owners who, like all left wing talkers before them, failed to make successful radio businesses, even though they were handed prime AM frequencies which were confiscated, in the name of public interest, from their previous conservative talk radio licensees.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jdawg</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/02/26/87-11-senate-passes-demint-amendment-to-ban-fairness-doctrine/comment-page-1/#comment-1924750</link>
		<dc:creator>jdawg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Feb 2009 00:33:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=45239#comment-1924750</guid>
		<description>The dems won&#039;t be happy until they completely silence all dissent, no matter how they slice it.  Truly &quot;fascism with a happy face.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The dems won&#8217;t be happy until they completely silence all dissent, no matter how they slice it.  Truly &#8220;fascism with a happy face.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: INC</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/02/26/87-11-senate-passes-demint-amendment-to-ban-fairness-doctrine/comment-page-1/#comment-1924743</link>
		<dc:creator>INC</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Feb 2009 00:30:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=45239#comment-1924743</guid>
		<description>DeMint is fully aware of what Durban is doing.  Some excerpts from his &lt;a href=&quot;http://twitter.com/JimDeMint&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;twitter&lt;/a&gt;.  The most recent ones are at the top.

&lt;blockquote&gt;We have closed the front door on Fairness Doctrine, but Durbin amend opens back door to censorship.

Durbin pass 57 – 41. All GOP opposed. Democrats exposed their plans to impose the fairness doctrine in the backdoor by FCC regulation

Durbin says &quot;the contents of media should reflect the diversity of America.&quot; translation: DC politicians decide what Americans hear 

Just spoke on Senate floor, Durbin now speaking, defending Fairness Doctrine and unwilling to admit the true intent to censor free speech&lt;/blockquote&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>DeMint is fully aware of what Durban is doing.  Some excerpts from his <a href="http://twitter.com/JimDeMint" rel="nofollow">twitter</a>.  The most recent ones are at the top.</p>
<blockquote><p>We have closed the front door on Fairness Doctrine, but Durbin amend opens back door to censorship.</p>
<p>Durbin pass 57 – 41. All GOP opposed. Democrats exposed their plans to impose the fairness doctrine in the backdoor by FCC regulation</p>
<p>Durbin says &#8220;the contents of media should reflect the diversity of America.&#8221; translation: DC politicians decide what Americans hear </p>
<p>Just spoke on Senate floor, Durbin now speaking, defending Fairness Doctrine and unwilling to admit the true intent to censor free speech</p></blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: greataunty</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/02/26/87-11-senate-passes-demint-amendment-to-ban-fairness-doctrine/comment-page-1/#comment-1924739</link>
		<dc:creator>greataunty</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Feb 2009 00:29:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=45239#comment-1924739</guid>
		<description>Dimint/Jindal 2012!!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dimint/Jindal 2012!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: INC</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/02/26/87-11-senate-passes-demint-amendment-to-ban-fairness-doctrine/comment-page-1/#comment-1924736</link>
		<dc:creator>INC</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Feb 2009 00:27:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=45239#comment-1924736</guid>
		<description>DeMint is fully awake.  &lt;a href=&quot;http://twitter.com/JimDeMint&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;From his twitter:&lt;/a&gt;

&lt;blockquote&gt;# Greg Walden joined me to talk about Fairness Doctrine ban and Democrats&#039; new backdoor censorship http://tinyurl.com/b2outsabout 3 hours ago from web

# Our ban on Fairness Doctrine passes 87-11. But fight not over, Dems have attacked from back door on media ownership, localism #tcotabout 4 hours ago from TwitterBerry

# We have closed the front door on Fairness Doctrine, but Durbin amend opens back door to censorship. The fight goes on #tcot #protectfairnessabout 5 hours ago from TwitterBerry

# Looks like our amend to ban Fairness Doctrine will pass. Victory for free speech #tcotabout 5 hours ago from TwitterBerry

# Durbin pass 57 – 41. All GOP opposed. Democrats exposed their plans to impose the fairness doctrine in the backdoor by FCC regulation #tcotabout 5 hours ago from TwitterBerry

# Here&#039;s an article on the Senate vote today on Fairness Doctrine http://tinyurl.com/cptnr8 #tcot #protectfairnessabout 5 hours ago from web

# Voting just started on Durbin&#039;s backdoor Fairness Doctrine amendment, mine to ban FD is up right after 
#tcotabout 5 hours ago from web

# Here&#039;s audio of the Fairness Doctrine floor debate: http://tinyurl.com/d2xzl6 #tcot #protectfairnessabout 6 hours ago from web

# Durbin says &quot;the contents of media should reflect the diversity of America.&quot; translation: DC politicians decide what Americans hear #tcotabout 7 hours ago from web

# Fairness Doctrine votes now set for 2pm, first on Durbin&#039;s backdoor FD amendment, then a vote on mine to ban FD. #tcotabout 7 hours ago from web

# Just spoke on Senate floor, Durbin now speaking, defending Fairness Doctrine and unwilling to admit the true intent to censor free speechabout 7 hours ago from web

# 2 votes on un-Fairness Doctrine today, my amend would ban FD, SenDurbin will offer amend imposing FD through FCC regulations #tcotabout 8 hours ago from web &lt;/blockquote&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>DeMint is fully awake.  <a href="http://twitter.com/JimDeMint" rel="nofollow">From his twitter:</a></p>
<blockquote><p># Greg Walden joined me to talk about Fairness Doctrine ban and Democrats&#8217; new backdoor censorship <a href="http://tinyurl.com/b2outsabout" rel="nofollow">http://tinyurl.com/b2outsabout</a> 3 hours ago from web</p>
<p># Our ban on Fairness Doctrine passes 87-11. But fight not over, Dems have attacked from back door on media ownership, localism #tcotabout 4 hours ago from TwitterBerry</p>
<p># We have closed the front door on Fairness Doctrine, but Durbin amend opens back door to censorship. The fight goes on #tcot #protectfairnessabout 5 hours ago from TwitterBerry</p>
<p># Looks like our amend to ban Fairness Doctrine will pass. Victory for free speech #tcotabout 5 hours ago from TwitterBerry</p>
<p># Durbin pass 57 – 41. All GOP opposed. Democrats exposed their plans to impose the fairness doctrine in the backdoor by FCC regulation #tcotabout 5 hours ago from TwitterBerry</p>
<p># Here&#8217;s an article on the Senate vote today on Fairness Doctrine <a href="http://tinyurl.com/cptnr8" rel="nofollow">http://tinyurl.com/cptnr8</a> #tcot #protectfairnessabout 5 hours ago from web</p>
<p># Voting just started on Durbin&#8217;s backdoor Fairness Doctrine amendment, mine to ban FD is up right after<br />
#tcotabout 5 hours ago from web</p>
<p># Here&#8217;s audio of the Fairness Doctrine floor debate: <a href="http://tinyurl.com/d2xzl6" rel="nofollow">http://tinyurl.com/d2xzl6</a> #tcot #protectfairnessabout 6 hours ago from web</p>
<p># Durbin says &#8220;the contents of media should reflect the diversity of America.&#8221; translation: DC politicians decide what Americans hear #tcotabout 7 hours ago from web</p>
<p># Fairness Doctrine votes now set for 2pm, first on Durbin&#8217;s backdoor FD amendment, then a vote on mine to ban FD. #tcotabout 7 hours ago from web</p>
<p># Just spoke on Senate floor, Durbin now speaking, defending Fairness Doctrine and unwilling to admit the true intent to censor free speechabout 7 hours ago from web</p>
<p># 2 votes on un-Fairness Doctrine today, my amend would ban FD, SenDurbin will offer amend imposing FD through FCC regulations #tcotabout 8 hours ago from web </p></blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Fairness Doctrine: Why Do I Keep Hearing About It!? &#8212; Objectively Biased</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/02/26/87-11-senate-passes-demint-amendment-to-ban-fairness-doctrine/comment-page-1/#comment-1924728</link>
		<dc:creator>Fairness Doctrine: Why Do I Keep Hearing About It!? &#8212; Objectively Biased</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Feb 2009 00:20:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=45239#comment-1924728</guid>
		<description>[...] Hotair adds: I thought they’d vote it down but in hindsight that was silly. Like I said in last week’s post [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Hotair adds: I thought they’d vote it down but in hindsight that was silly. Like I said in last week’s post [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DL13</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/02/26/87-11-senate-passes-demint-amendment-to-ban-fairness-doctrine/comment-page-1/#comment-1924708</link>
		<dc:creator>DL13</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Feb 2009 00:12:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=45239#comment-1924708</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m more worried about Durban&#039;s amendment that leaves the door open to change ownership for the betterment of the community at a later date. A creeping Fairness Doctrine in the works?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m more worried about Durban&#8217;s amendment that leaves the door open to change ownership for the betterment of the community at a later date. A creeping Fairness Doctrine in the works?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: stefanite</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/02/26/87-11-senate-passes-demint-amendment-to-ban-fairness-doctrine/comment-page-1/#comment-1924700</link>
		<dc:creator>stefanite</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Feb 2009 00:08:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=45239#comment-1924700</guid>
		<description>There is some serious bad news to this story, guys.  This is just an amendment to a bill giving congressional representation to the &lt;a href=&quot;http://thehill.com/leading-the-news/senate-approves-granting-d.c.-a-house-vote-2009-02-26.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;District of Columbia&lt;/a&gt;.

I&#039;m sorry... if this passes, &lt;strong&gt;we lose&lt;/strong&gt;.  No wonder so many dems voted for it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There is some serious bad news to this story, guys.  This is just an amendment to a bill giving congressional representation to the <a href="http://thehill.com/leading-the-news/senate-approves-granting-d.c.-a-house-vote-2009-02-26.html" rel="nofollow">District of Columbia</a>.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m sorry&#8230; if this passes, <strong>we lose</strong>.  No wonder so many dems voted for it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: eaglescout1998</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/02/26/87-11-senate-passes-demint-amendment-to-ban-fairness-doctrine/comment-page-1/#comment-1924634</link>
		<dc:creator>eaglescout1998</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Feb 2009 23:37:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=45239#comment-1924634</guid>
		<description>Boxer voted Yea?!!

And I thought Feinstein was the more sensible one.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Boxer voted Yea?!!</p>
<p>And I thought Feinstein was the more sensible one.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
