<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Byrd: Obama&#8217;s consolidating power in the White House</title>
	<atom:link href="http://hotair.com/archives/2009/02/25/byrd-obamas-consolidating-power-in-the-white-house/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/02/25/byrd-obamas-consolidating-power-in-the-white-house/</link>
	<description>The world’s first, full-service conservative Internet broadcast network</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2012 03:59:57 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: saiga</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/02/25/byrd-obamas-consolidating-power-in-the-white-house/comment-page-1/#comment-1923388</link>
		<dc:creator>saiga</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Feb 2009 19:03:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=45129#comment-1923388</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;The tree of liberty must be refreshed from time to time with the blood of patriots and tyrants.-Thomas Jefferson

nemesis on February 26, 2009 at 1:53 AM

&lt;/blockquote&gt;

The way things are shaping up, the wheels will come off quickly/.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>The tree of liberty must be refreshed from time to time with the blood of patriots and tyrants.-Thomas Jefferson</p>
<p>nemesis on February 26, 2009 at 1:53 AM</p>
</blockquote>
<p>The way things are shaping up, the wheels will come off quickly/.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Byrd Has Concerns &#171; Beltway Snark</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/02/25/byrd-obamas-consolidating-power-in-the-white-house/comment-page-1/#comment-1922766</link>
		<dc:creator>Byrd Has Concerns &#171; Beltway Snark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Feb 2009 14:57:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=45129#comment-1922766</guid>
		<description>[...] to Comments I could make a KKK joke here, but it&#8217;s too easy and the old coot actually has a valid argument. In a letter to Obama on Wednesday, Byrd complained about Obama’s decision to create White House [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] to Comments I could make a KKK joke here, but it&#8217;s too easy and the old coot actually has a valid argument. In a letter to Obama on Wednesday, Byrd complained about Obama’s decision to create White House [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: nemesis</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/02/25/byrd-obamas-consolidating-power-in-the-white-house/comment-page-1/#comment-1922215</link>
		<dc:creator>nemesis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Feb 2009 06:53:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=45129#comment-1922215</guid>
		<description>The tree of liberty must be refreshed from time to time with the blood of patriots and tyrants.-Thomas Jefferson</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The tree of liberty must be refreshed from time to time with the blood of patriots and tyrants.-Thomas Jefferson</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ThereGoesTheNeighborhood</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/02/25/byrd-obamas-consolidating-power-in-the-white-house/comment-page-1/#comment-1922174</link>
		<dc:creator>ThereGoesTheNeighborhood</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Feb 2009 05:49:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=45129#comment-1922174</guid>
		<description>Byrd is right.  I agree, that&#039;s a scary thought.  But I comfort myself with this thought: Even a stopped clock is right twice a day, so Byrd can be right once in his 55 years in Congress.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Byrd is right.  I agree, that&#8217;s a scary thought.  But I comfort myself with this thought: Even a stopped clock is right twice a day, so Byrd can be right once in his 55 years in Congress.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: RD</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/02/25/byrd-obamas-consolidating-power-in-the-white-house/comment-page-1/#comment-1922071</link>
		<dc:creator>RD</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Feb 2009 04:47:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=45129#comment-1922071</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;I’m starting to wonder if Obama is a Short Seller and cashing in by simply opening his stupid mouth

jp on February 25, 2009 at 4:41 PM&lt;/blockquote&gt;

No kidding.  If not he should be.

&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;em&gt;Why doesn’t Obama just appoint Daschle as “health-care advisor” or something?&lt;/em&gt;
Just wait a couple of months. It’s coming.

GarandFan on February 25, 2009 at 4:33 PM&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Yep.  Agree with you &amp; all who posted this.

&lt;blockquote&gt;I don’t like Byrd, but he has a real point.

Look at Chu at the Department of Energy - he is an obvious figurehead, who will have no real authority.

Realist on February 25, 2009 at 4:26 PM&lt;/blockquote&gt;

By that rationale, I&#039;m not sure if Chu ended up in the right place, since he strikes me as precisely the kind of guy that Obama &lt;em&gt;does&lt;/em&gt; want in his inner circle.  Perhaps Obama made the staffing announcement too early (like November or December, wasn&#039;t it?), at a time when his 100% White House-driven czar-opolis was just a beautiful dream?  :-)  And then simply stuck with it, rather than play the &quot;new game&quot;?

I have to keep reminding myself, this guy (Obama) is also an &lt;em&gt;innovator&lt;/em&gt;.  If he tries something outrageous in January &lt;em&gt;and gets away with it&lt;/em&gt;, he&#039;s liable to try something even newer, bolder and more unprecedented in March or April.  And on and on...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>I’m starting to wonder if Obama is a Short Seller and cashing in by simply opening his stupid mouth</p>
<p>jp on February 25, 2009 at 4:41 PM</p></blockquote>
<p>No kidding.  If not he should be.</p>
<blockquote><p><em>Why doesn’t Obama just appoint Daschle as “health-care advisor” or something?</em><br />
Just wait a couple of months. It’s coming.</p>
<p>GarandFan on February 25, 2009 at 4:33 PM</p></blockquote>
<p>Yep.  Agree with you &amp; all who posted this.</p>
<blockquote><p>I don’t like Byrd, but he has a real point.</p>
<p>Look at Chu at the Department of Energy &#8211; he is an obvious figurehead, who will have no real authority.</p>
<p>Realist on February 25, 2009 at 4:26 PM</p></blockquote>
<p>By that rationale, I&#8217;m not sure if Chu ended up in the right place, since he strikes me as precisely the kind of guy that Obama <em>does</em> want in his inner circle.  Perhaps Obama made the staffing announcement too early (like November or December, wasn&#8217;t it?), at a time when his 100% White House-driven czar-opolis was just a beautiful dream?  :-)  And then simply stuck with it, rather than play the &#8220;new game&#8221;?</p>
<p>I have to keep reminding myself, this guy (Obama) is also an <em>innovator</em>.  If he tries something outrageous in January <em>and gets away with it</em>, he&#8217;s liable to try something even newer, bolder and more unprecedented in March or April.  And on and on&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ExcessivelyDiverted</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/02/25/byrd-obamas-consolidating-power-in-the-white-house/comment-page-1/#comment-1921917</link>
		<dc:creator>ExcessivelyDiverted</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Feb 2009 04:00:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=45129#comment-1921917</guid>
		<description>Byrd is not a Democrat, Byrd is a Dixiecrat.  Big difference.

He makes a good point about the secrecy of Dear Leader&#039;s White House.  Ironically, when the Bush/Cheney team was less than transparent, the liberals screamed and shrieked to the heavens.  A few days ago on Democratic Underground, there was a thread about how refreshingly honest and transparent the Obama administration is.  They keep sucking down the Kool-aid.

Maybe Byrd will squawk loud enough that someone will pay attention.  Most likely, Byrd will die first.  I&#039;m sure that is what Obama is hoping for.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Byrd is not a Democrat, Byrd is a Dixiecrat.  Big difference.</p>
<p>He makes a good point about the secrecy of Dear Leader&#8217;s White House.  Ironically, when the Bush/Cheney team was less than transparent, the liberals screamed and shrieked to the heavens.  A few days ago on Democratic Underground, there was a thread about how refreshingly honest and transparent the Obama administration is.  They keep sucking down the Kool-aid.</p>
<p>Maybe Byrd will squawk loud enough that someone will pay attention.  Most likely, Byrd will die first.  I&#8217;m sure that is what Obama is hoping for.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: orville</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/02/25/byrd-obamas-consolidating-power-in-the-white-house/comment-page-1/#comment-1921551</link>
		<dc:creator>orville</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Feb 2009 02:29:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=45129#comment-1921551</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;
&lt;strong&gt;Shadow Cabinet… plain and simple.&lt;/strong&gt;

Romeo13 on February 25, 2009 at 5:01 PM&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Bingo!  Making His Royal Heiny the perfect Hussein II bookend to Good Riddance Hussein.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>
<strong>Shadow Cabinet… plain and simple.</strong></p>
<p>Romeo13 on February 25, 2009 at 5:01 PM</p></blockquote>
<p>Bingo!  Making His Royal Heiny the perfect Hussein II bookend to Good Riddance Hussein.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rplat</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/02/25/byrd-obamas-consolidating-power-in-the-white-house/comment-page-1/#comment-1921523</link>
		<dc:creator>rplat</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Feb 2009 02:18:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=45129#comment-1921523</guid>
		<description>Of course he is.  We tried to tell his idiot constituents about his agenda but they were to stupid to understand. Well now you fools have your messiah and your communist state.  If you think things were bad before just wait a few years.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Of course he is.  We tried to tell his idiot constituents about his agenda but they were to stupid to understand. Well now you fools have your messiah and your communist state.  If you think things were bad before just wait a few years.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nervous Byrd? &#171; Political rumblings and rants</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/02/25/byrd-obamas-consolidating-power-in-the-white-house/comment-page-1/#comment-1921447</link>
		<dc:creator>Nervous Byrd? &#171; Political rumblings and rants</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Feb 2009 01:56:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=45129#comment-1921447</guid>
		<description>[...] go read the whole article.  It&#8217;s worth it.  It gives more commentary on Obama&#8217;s habit of appointing people, [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] go read the whole article.  It&#8217;s worth it.  It gives more commentary on Obama&#8217;s habit of appointing people, [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: fusionaddict</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/02/25/byrd-obamas-consolidating-power-in-the-white-house/comment-page-1/#comment-1921363</link>
		<dc:creator>fusionaddict</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Feb 2009 01:29:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=45129#comment-1921363</guid>
		<description>In other breaking news, a blind squirrel found an acorn.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In other breaking news, a blind squirrel found an acorn.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: moxie_neanderthal</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/02/25/byrd-obamas-consolidating-power-in-the-white-house/comment-page-1/#comment-1921117</link>
		<dc:creator>moxie_neanderthal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Feb 2009 00:28:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=45129#comment-1921117</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Then:&lt;/strong&gt; Anti Bush rant: Rich wisdom and sage advice from the Senior Senator from West Virginia. 
&lt;strong&gt;Now:&lt;/strong&gt; Anti Obama rant: crazy old coot who should have retired a long time ago. 

media ~nuance~</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Then:</strong> Anti Bush rant: Rich wisdom and sage advice from the Senior Senator from West Virginia.<br />
<strong>Now:</strong> Anti Obama rant: crazy old coot who should have retired a long time ago. </p>
<p>media ~nuance~</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MB4</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/02/25/byrd-obamas-consolidating-power-in-the-white-house/comment-page-1/#comment-1921035</link>
		<dc:creator>MB4</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Feb 2009 00:05:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=45129#comment-1921035</guid>
		<description>We hear praise of a power-wielding, arm-twisting President who “gets his program through Congress” by knowing the use of power. Throughout the course of history, there have been many other such wielders of power. There have even been dictators who regularly held plebiscites, in which their dictatorships were approved by an Ivory-soap-like percentage of the electorate. But their countries were not free, nor can any country remain free under such despotic power. Some of the current worship of powerful executives may come from those who admire strength and accomplishment of any sort. Others hail the display of Presidential strength simply because they approve of the result reached by the use of power. This is nothing less than the totalitarian philosophy that the end justifies the means If ever there was a philosophy of government totally at war with that of the Founding Fathers, it is this one.
- Barry Goldwater</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We hear praise of a power-wielding, arm-twisting President who “gets his program through Congress” by knowing the use of power. Throughout the course of history, there have been many other such wielders of power. There have even been dictators who regularly held plebiscites, in which their dictatorships were approved by an Ivory-soap-like percentage of the electorate. But their countries were not free, nor can any country remain free under such despotic power. Some of the current worship of powerful executives may come from those who admire strength and accomplishment of any sort. Others hail the display of Presidential strength simply because they approve of the result reached by the use of power. This is nothing less than the totalitarian philosophy that the end justifies the means If ever there was a philosophy of government totally at war with that of the Founding Fathers, it is this one.<br />
- Barry Goldwater</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: myrenovations</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/02/25/byrd-obamas-consolidating-power-in-the-white-house/comment-page-1/#comment-1920905</link>
		<dc:creator>myrenovations</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Feb 2009 23:37:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=45129#comment-1920905</guid>
		<description>Byrd was thrown under the bus before this Congress was seated - they took Appropriations away from him.  He&#039;s got nothing now and they are just waiting for him to go away and die.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Byrd was thrown under the bus before this Congress was seated &#8211; they took Appropriations away from him.  He&#8217;s got nothing now and they are just waiting for him to go away and die.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sackett</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/02/25/byrd-obamas-consolidating-power-in-the-white-house/comment-page-1/#comment-1920872</link>
		<dc:creator>Sackett</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Feb 2009 23:32:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=45129#comment-1920872</guid>
		<description>I believe it&#039;s called the &quot;Kitchen Cabinet&quot;?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I believe it&#8217;s called the &#8220;Kitchen Cabinet&#8221;?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DarkKnight3565</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/02/25/byrd-obamas-consolidating-power-in-the-white-house/comment-page-1/#comment-1920844</link>
		<dc:creator>DarkKnight3565</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Feb 2009 23:26:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=45129#comment-1920844</guid>
		<description>I agree that there is an oligarchic mentality to the Obama White House - that they are the smart ones, the chosen few, with the great ideas. 

And this mentality has lead them to undermine the rights of private enterprises and the rights of states. Furthermore they threaten to undermine the rights of the individual. 

All in everyone else&#039;s best interest, of course.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree that there is an oligarchic mentality to the Obama White House &#8211; that they are the smart ones, the chosen few, with the great ideas. </p>
<p>And this mentality has lead them to undermine the rights of private enterprises and the rights of states. Furthermore they threaten to undermine the rights of the individual. </p>
<p>All in everyone else&#8217;s best interest, of course.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: baldilocks</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/02/25/byrd-obamas-consolidating-power-in-the-white-house/comment-page-1/#comment-1920831</link>
		<dc:creator>baldilocks</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Feb 2009 23:24:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=45129#comment-1920831</guid>
		<description>Each day is stranger than the preceding one.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Each day is stranger than the preceding one.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: pugwriter</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/02/25/byrd-obamas-consolidating-power-in-the-white-house/comment-page-1/#comment-1920725</link>
		<dc:creator>pugwriter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Feb 2009 23:03:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=45129#comment-1920725</guid>
		<description>Obama is so far to the left that Senator Byrd and I are on the same side of an issue?
&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.restoreourliberty.org&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;
www.restoreourliberty.org&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Obama is so far to the left that Senator Byrd and I are on the same side of an issue?<br />
<a href="http://www.restoreourliberty.org" rel="nofollow"><br />
</a><a href="http://www.restoreourliberty.org" rel="nofollow">http://www.restoreourliberty.org</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rockmom</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/02/25/byrd-obamas-consolidating-power-in-the-white-house/comment-page-1/#comment-1920707</link>
		<dc:creator>rockmom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Feb 2009 22:59:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=45129#comment-1920707</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;What can we do about it?

Isn’t this unconstitutional?

If so then why is it happening anyway?

PrincipledPilgrim on February 25, 2009 at 4:36 PM&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Sue, sue, sue.  Larry Klayman will probably do it.  There was a successful lawsuit that recovered all the minutes and staff papers from Hillary&#039;s health care task force, and another one over the energy task force that Dick Cheney headed.  But the suits need to be filed NOW, not after the policies are made.

One thing the Republicans can really nail the Administration on is that almost all of these &quot;czars&quot; are white, while the actual Cabinet appointees are the window-dressing minorities.  Does anyone really think Lisa Jackson is calling the shots at EPA, with Carol Browner sitting there in the White House?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>What can we do about it?</p>
<p>Isn’t this unconstitutional?</p>
<p>If so then why is it happening anyway?</p>
<p>PrincipledPilgrim on February 25, 2009 at 4:36 PM</p></blockquote>
<p>Sue, sue, sue.  Larry Klayman will probably do it.  There was a successful lawsuit that recovered all the minutes and staff papers from Hillary&#8217;s health care task force, and another one over the energy task force that Dick Cheney headed.  But the suits need to be filed NOW, not after the policies are made.</p>
<p>One thing the Republicans can really nail the Administration on is that almost all of these &#8220;czars&#8221; are white, while the actual Cabinet appointees are the window-dressing minorities.  Does anyone really think Lisa Jackson is calling the shots at EPA, with Carol Browner sitting there in the White House?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: unclesmrgol</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/02/25/byrd-obamas-consolidating-power-in-the-white-house/comment-page-1/#comment-1920699</link>
		<dc:creator>unclesmrgol</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Feb 2009 22:54:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=45129#comment-1920699</guid>
		<description>Why is Byrd so upset?  Don&#039;t the laws still need to be passed by Congress?  I see nothing unConstitutional in the President having an independent research office inform himself.  If Congress doesn&#039;t like it, they omit funding from the budget for the people involved, and that&#039;s that.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why is Byrd so upset?  Don&#8217;t the laws still need to be passed by Congress?  I see nothing unConstitutional in the President having an independent research office inform himself.  If Congress doesn&#8217;t like it, they omit funding from the budget for the people involved, and that&#8217;s that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: PattyJ</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/02/25/byrd-obamas-consolidating-power-in-the-white-house/comment-page-1/#comment-1920684</link>
		<dc:creator>PattyJ</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Feb 2009 22:51:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=45129#comment-1920684</guid>
		<description>&quot;Obvious exit question: Why doesn’t Obama just appoint Daschle as “health-care advisor” or something?&quot;

Give him a couple of weeks.

I agree, this is a well thought out plan to centralize power, not save the economy.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Obvious exit question: Why doesn’t Obama just appoint Daschle as “health-care advisor” or something?&#8221;</p>
<p>Give him a couple of weeks.</p>
<p>I agree, this is a well thought out plan to centralize power, not save the economy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: neuquenguy</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/02/25/byrd-obamas-consolidating-power-in-the-white-house/comment-page-1/#comment-1920674</link>
		<dc:creator>neuquenguy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Feb 2009 22:49:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=45129#comment-1920674</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;What you end up with is essentially a Medieval court: no one doing any actual work; everyone intentionally kept at each other’s throats, jockeying for the king’s favor.

logis on February 25, 2009 at 5:46 PM&lt;/blockquote&gt;
I wouldn&#039;t mind that if it kept the democrats from spending a trillion a week.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>What you end up with is essentially a Medieval court: no one doing any actual work; everyone intentionally kept at each other’s throats, jockeying for the king’s favor.</p>
<p>logis on February 25, 2009 at 5:46 PM</p></blockquote>
<p>I wouldn&#8217;t mind that if it kept the democrats from spending a trillion a week.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: neuquenguy</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/02/25/byrd-obamas-consolidating-power-in-the-white-house/comment-page-1/#comment-1920669</link>
		<dc:creator>neuquenguy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Feb 2009 22:48:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=45129#comment-1920669</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;
Boxer Seeks to Ratify U.N. Treaty That May Erode U.S. Parental Rights

http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2009/02/25/boxer-seeks-ratify-treaty-erode-rights/

Sugarbuzz on February 25, 2009 at 4:58 PM
&lt;/blockquote&gt;
Not surprising. How long before we ratify Kioto so we can start the transfer of wealth to third world countries?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>
Boxer Seeks to Ratify U.N. Treaty That May Erode U.S. Parental Rights</p>
<p><a href="http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2009/02/25/boxer-seeks-ratify-treaty-erode-rights/" rel="nofollow">http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2009/02/25/boxer-seeks-ratify-treaty-erode-rights/</a></p>
<p>Sugarbuzz on February 25, 2009 at 4:58 PM
</p></blockquote>
<p>Not surprising. How long before we ratify Kioto so we can start the transfer of wealth to third world countries?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: logis</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/02/25/byrd-obamas-consolidating-power-in-the-white-house/comment-page-1/#comment-1920661</link>
		<dc:creator>logis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Feb 2009 22:46:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=45129#comment-1920661</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;“Aides say he believes the Cabinet structure is outdated because it doesn’t recognize that problems like global warming sprawl across several agencies, often requiring a sort of uber-Cabinet member – a czar – to confront them.” &lt;/blockquote&gt;

Taking away all the structure and official hierarchy from an organization doesn&#039;t make it more efficient.  Obama is taking away the Cabinet, and he&#039;s not replacing it with anything.  

What you end up with is essentially a Medieval court:  no one doing any actual work; everyone intentionally kept at each other&#039;s throats, jockeying for the king&#039;s favor.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>“Aides say he believes the Cabinet structure is outdated because it doesn’t recognize that problems like global warming sprawl across several agencies, often requiring a sort of uber-Cabinet member – a czar – to confront them.” </p></blockquote>
<p>Taking away all the structure and official hierarchy from an organization doesn&#8217;t make it more efficient.  Obama is taking away the Cabinet, and he&#8217;s not replacing it with anything.  </p>
<p>What you end up with is essentially a Medieval court:  no one doing any actual work; everyone intentionally kept at each other&#8217;s throats, jockeying for the king&#8217;s favor.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: James Dahl</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/02/25/byrd-obamas-consolidating-power-in-the-white-house/comment-page-1/#comment-1920655</link>
		<dc:creator>James Dahl</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Feb 2009 22:44:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=45129#comment-1920655</guid>
		<description>This is Bush 43&#039;s centralization of authority within the office of the presidency coming back to haunt him.  Removing so many checks and balances to bypass Democrats in the Senate and House in order to establish sweeping powers to fight the GWOT means now Obama has those exact same sweeping powers to do whatever he likes.

Forcing all government action to go through the house and senate may have seemed like a stupid idea a year ago, but I bet you&#039;re all regretting that so many cracks have been made in that system over the last 7 years.

Let this be a lesson to all of you:  checks and balances are good things.  They may make things harder when you&#039;re in power, but you sure appreciate them when you&#039;re not.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is Bush 43&#8242;s centralization of authority within the office of the presidency coming back to haunt him.  Removing so many checks and balances to bypass Democrats in the Senate and House in order to establish sweeping powers to fight the GWOT means now Obama has those exact same sweeping powers to do whatever he likes.</p>
<p>Forcing all government action to go through the house and senate may have seemed like a stupid idea a year ago, but I bet you&#8217;re all regretting that so many cracks have been made in that system over the last 7 years.</p>
<p>Let this be a lesson to all of you:  checks and balances are good things.  They may make things harder when you&#8217;re in power, but you sure appreciate them when you&#8217;re not.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: r keller</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/02/25/byrd-obamas-consolidating-power-in-the-white-house/comment-page-1/#comment-1920624</link>
		<dc:creator>r keller</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Feb 2009 22:34:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=45129#comment-1920624</guid>
		<description>I hope I don&#039;t miss the NBC report on the increasing power of the unitary executive.

If someone can give me the time, I&#039;ll set my TIVO.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I hope I don&#8217;t miss the NBC report on the increasing power of the unitary executive.</p>
<p>If someone can give me the time, I&#8217;ll set my TIVO.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
