Weak: WaPo preemptively apologizes for monkey cartoon

posted at 4:27 pm on February 23, 2009 by Allahpundit

The boss is outraged and Howard Kurtz is mystified but it’s entirely predictable.

The headline, illustration and text of “Below the Beltway,” a column in The Washington Post Magazine today, may cause offense to readers. The magazine was printed before a widely publicized incident last week in which a chimpanzee attacked and badly mauled a woman in Stamford, Conn. In addition, the image and text inadvertently may conjure racial stereotypes that The Post does not countenance. We regret the lapse.

Why predictable? Because the Post has a habit of cravenly apologizing to head off controversy before so much as a single angry voice of public protest has been lifted. Remember when they torpedoed the “Opus” strip on Islam because an ad hoc focus group of their Muslim employees found it offensive? No one, not even CAIR, ended up getting worked up about it. In fact, their own ombudsman eventually scolded them for jumping to conclusions about reader reaction. When it comes to defending their contributors against bad-faith claims of prejudice, they’re happy to take the path of least resistance. Can you blame them, though? The lesson of the left’s calculated hysteria over McCain’s “celebrity” ads last summer was that racism is present if an identified victim says it is, regardless of whether it’s either intended or perceived by most of the audience. If someone’s offended, they simply must have good reason to be, which makes this WaPo apology the equivalent of those moronic warnings on coffee cups: “Caution: Hot beverage inside!” If all that stands between your business and liability is a formal disclaimer, why not be on the safe side and toss it out there unbidden? CYA.

Blowback

Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.

Trackbacks/Pings

Trackback URL

Comments

Comment pages: 1 2

Disturbing.

Dr. Manhattan on February 23, 2009 at 4:28 PM

missed opp: they could have turned it all on its head by making the loser with the droopy flower bouquet a black man!

max1 on February 23, 2009 at 4:31 PM

I am offended by the pre-apology. Apologize, WaPo!

rbj on February 23, 2009 at 4:32 PM

I never associate black people with apes until the Leberals tell me to…seems odd….

CCRWM on February 23, 2009 at 4:32 PM

Monkeys randomly typing on a typewriter being essentially a dead metaphor…
…the bill having not been written by P.BO…
How much of an @$$ do you have to be to jump to the conclusion that the cartoon was depicting the President as a chimp?

Count to 10 on February 23, 2009 at 4:32 PM

The boss is outraged

Not outraged.

Bitterly amused.

Michelle on February 23, 2009 at 4:32 PM

… you know, instead of using the Joel Siegel lookalike… :)

max1 on February 23, 2009 at 4:33 PM

It won’t be much longer before people will be hanging up apologies next to zoo signs…..just in case.

At that point we’ll know we finally have overcome racism.

GardenGnome on February 23, 2009 at 4:35 PM

Does it mean I’m a racist if I don’t get the cartoon? Or that I’m more outraged at the suggestion of bestiality?

Nethicus on February 23, 2009 at 4:35 PM

More pandering from the loon’s on the left…

OmahaConservative on February 23, 2009 at 4:36 PM

Blah blah blah blah blah blah blah.

That’s all they say anymore…

-The Sheikh

blatantblue on February 23, 2009 at 4:37 PM

How much of an @$$ do you have to be to jump to the conclusion that the cartoon was depicting the President as a chimp?

Count to 10 on February 23, 2009 at 4:32 PM

Ummm…Al Sharpton big?

Just guessin..

catmman on February 23, 2009 at 4:39 PM

So very, very lame.

Spirit of 1776 on February 23, 2009 at 4:40 PM

Bitterly amused.

Michelle on February 23, 2009 at 4:32 PM

That seems appropriate.

Honestly, it seems racist that they find the cartoon racist. If every time they see a cartoon monkey they think of black people, isn’t that more telling about them?

Esthier on February 23, 2009 at 4:40 PM

ummm…Im not offended. Of course, Im not black.

becki51758 on February 23, 2009 at 4:40 PM

It seems to me, that those who are “offended” by any alleged implication of likeness to simians, are embracing said implication of likeness, and admitting to same, precisely because they claim to be “offended.”

If somebody said that I looked like a porpoise, I, most assuredly, wouldn’t be “offended,” inasmuch as I don’t think that I look like a porpoise. A dolphin, maybe, but not a porpoise.

OhEssYouCowboys on February 23, 2009 at 4:41 PM

The 1st amendment is under the bus.
L

letget on February 23, 2009 at 4:41 PM

I really wish organizations would stop worrying about things said by Al Sharpton.

Where, oh where, is the company chief that will say, “Who cares what this guy has to say. If someone with a stitch of integrity has an issue with the comic, let me know. If it’s just this guy, I’m not going to bother with a response.”

JadeNYU on February 23, 2009 at 4:41 PM

|-0

That’s my new emoticon for a yawn.

Akzed on February 23, 2009 at 4:43 PM

Behold a nation of cowards.

~ ~ M. Malkin

Indeed

Plus, Kurtz thought the apology was “odd”. From MM’s site.

Entelechy on February 23, 2009 at 4:43 PM

Why is it the accused racists are rarely even slightly bigoted – and the ones doing the accusing are lock step with Bull Connor and don’t even know it?

Throw the water already…what a world.

kybowexar on February 23, 2009 at 4:43 PM

P.S. If you threw Al Sharpton into the Hudson river, there would have to be immediate efforts to contain the oil. The failure to do so would rival the Exxon Valdez disaster.

OhEssYouCowboys on February 23, 2009 at 4:44 PM

I’m really sorry: I had a banana with my cereal this morning while reading the Post online.

The ghost of Katherine Graham will haunt me forever.

Wow.

SteveMG on February 23, 2009 at 4:44 PM

This is offensive……………

……….. but a crucifix upside down in a jar of urine is art?

Seven Percent Solution on February 23, 2009 at 4:44 PM

Remember when Garfield was funny?

- The Cat

MirCat on February 23, 2009 at 4:45 PM

That whole monkey thing was stupid. I never took it as meaning Obama was a monkey…..clearly, Obama is a sock puppet.

What I took from the cartoon was two things:
A> reference to the monkey mauling the owners’ friend.
B> if you put a monkey in front of a typewriter for long enough, he would eventually type the constitution. That’s what this bill is, random and corrupt spending, not something well thought out.

The entire race baiting argument is bullcrap. Get a life Sharpton.

Spiritk9 on February 23, 2009 at 4:45 PM

They Bush Doctrine’d the apology. Man up WaPo.

V15J on February 23, 2009 at 4:47 PM

MirCat on February 23, 2009 at 4:45 PM

It’s gotten a new life.

Abby Adams on February 23, 2009 at 4:49 PM

We are chimps now.

Bishop on February 23, 2009 at 4:50 PM

I don’t recall the WaPo ever apologizing for those awful cartoons about Condi Rice. Such hypocrites. One good thing about the NY Post’s appology last week. They only appologized to anyone that was offended. That seemed to cover it.

BetseyRoss on February 23, 2009 at 4:54 PM

It’s especially rediculous when if you actually read the article, that the context of the picture was based on a study showing female humans are sexually aroused by videos of monkeys mating. The picture makes perfect sense, is completely in line with the gist of the whole article, and I don’t see how even the most “I’m a victim” mentality could have considered the picture racist.

If I were black, I’d be deeply offended that a newspaper would feel it has to apologize to me for showing a picture of an ape.

DrAllecon on February 23, 2009 at 4:54 PM

They actually apologized for that cartoon?!?

Un-friggin’-real.

JetBoy on February 23, 2009 at 4:55 PM

Ok, having read the article, which was linked in the headlines picks this morning, this is UTTERLY RIDICULOUS. The article was generally very strange, but did discuss the bonbo within the text.

So now publishers have become so afraid of legal action that they can’t feel comfortable publishing a relevant cartoon?

Where is my country? This isn’t it.

Marine_Bio on February 23, 2009 at 4:55 PM

Where is my country? This isn’t it.

Marine_Bio on February 23, 2009 at 4:55 PM

Yeah, we could actually learn something from the Danes when it comes to free speech and expression.

JetBoy on February 23, 2009 at 4:57 PM

If I were black, I’d be deeply offended that a newspaper would feel it has to apologize to me for showing a picture of an ape.

DrAllecon on February 23, 2009 at 4:54 PM

Exactly.

Marine_Bio on February 23, 2009 at 4:57 PM

Well at least that one LOOKS like Obama!

Lonetown on February 23, 2009 at 4:58 PM

If I were black, I’d be deeply offended that a newspaper would feel it has to apologize to me for showing a picture of an ape.

DrAllecon on February 23, 2009 at 4:54 PM

I am.

baldilocks on February 23, 2009 at 5:00 PM

We are chimps now.

Bishop on February 23, 2009 at 4:50 PM

Devolution

Entelechy on February 23, 2009 at 5:03 PM

mmmm…tasty censorship and suicide. Its a voluntary/subconscious censorship completely a consequence of political correctness.

Oh so sorry, we hope we didn’t offend anyone who lacks a sense of humor or basic ability to use reason and logic. We understand that you are weak and stupid. You should have probably died off naturally but we’ll play nice and keep you around to bite at the ankles of the rest of us so that soon we’ll all be bottom feeders chomping for something offensive that we can take issue with no matter how big or small or unintended.

Is this what it was like in the days before the Archduke Ferdinand event? Just waiting for something, anything to ignite the powder keg.

What are you looking at? Racist! Clearly you want to fight!

Paul_McD on February 23, 2009 at 5:03 PM

It’s especially rediculous when if you actually read the article, that the context of the picture was based on a study showing female humans are sexually aroused by videos of monkeys mating. The picture makes perfect sense, is completely in line with the gist of the whole article, and I don’t see how even the most “I’m a victim” mentality could have considered the picture racist.

DrAllecon on February 23, 2009 at 4:54 PM

IF ANYONE should be offended, it’s WOMEN who are being depicted as preferring sex with apes over sex with men. As a woman, I’m offended by other women who get aroused by ape porn.

Brat on February 23, 2009 at 5:03 PM

I am.

baldilocks on February 23, 2009 at 5:00 PM

“How sanctimonious of you” ~ ~ crr6

Entelechy on February 23, 2009 at 5:04 PM

Chimpanzees = Obama?

What about apes, gorillas or just plain old monkeys.
Does this mean no King Kong movies on TV for the next 4 years?

And then I wonder how many votes the name Obama is going to get for this one:
Name the baby Gorilla at the San Francisco Zoo.

albill on February 23, 2009 at 5:04 PM

I guess monkey/chimp/ape will be words stricken from the dictionary used at WaPo for atleast the next four years.

katiejane on February 23, 2009 at 5:05 PM

Look…I AM offended..and I am even more offended that you can not see why I am offended…quite frankly that is what is most offensive…you damn monkey!

winston on February 23, 2009 at 5:07 PM

Where are the apologies from cartoonists who spent eight years caricaturing George W. Bush as a rodent or cricket?

whitetop on February 23, 2009 at 5:07 PM

“How sanctimonious of you” ~ ~ crr6

Entelechy on February 23, 2009 at 5:04 PM

That really bothered you, didn’t it? Relax, girl. Only those with an inferiority complex concern themselves with the alleged superiority and sanctimony of others.

baldilocks on February 23, 2009 at 5:08 PM

Honestly, it seems racist that they find the cartoon racist. If every time they see a cartoon monkey they think of black people, isn’t that more telling about them?

Esthier on February 23, 2009 at 4:40 PM

White liberals and their reflexive cringing makes me want to hit them. This is a playground slur being raised to almost the level of a crime. Most white babies (and some adults) make me think of pigs. Pigs taste nice but they’re not nearly as cute as monkeys. So shall I arrest myself now, or am I just being honest and not cowardly.

Fortunata on February 23, 2009 at 5:09 PM

Saw a great bumper sticker over the weekend that applies here.
“No one can make you feel inferior without your consent”

goplibertygirl on February 23, 2009 at 5:10 PM

As an advanced culture we need to move beyond cartoon protests and apologies.

So let’s now begin a proper cultural cleansing campaign against any article or movie which references or depicts apes or monkeys in the context of humor and not science.

econavenger on February 23, 2009 at 5:11 PM

Saw a great bumper sticker over the weekend that applies here.
“No one can make you feel inferior without your consent”

goplibertygirl on February 23, 2009 at 5:10 PM

That wasn’t a bumper sticker, it was an entire Obama speech!

highhopes on February 23, 2009 at 5:13 PM

And they wonder why newspapers are going under…they are going to get what they deserve.
BTW, Gert is on Glen Beck…

d1carter on February 23, 2009 at 5:13 PM

monkey, monkey, monkey, monkey, monkey, monkey, monkey, monkey, monkey, monkey

winston on February 23, 2009 at 5:13 PM

I’m offended that they didn’t identify the monkey in question. Was it Mike, Davy, Mickey, or Peter????

ScottG on February 23, 2009 at 5:14 PM

The monkey word is hence forth known as the Mword

winston on February 23, 2009 at 5:15 PM

Darn, I guess one of my favorite movie lines will have to be edited ow

“Take your stinking paws off me you damn dirty ape!”\

we are all lower primates now…

max1 on February 23, 2009 at 5:16 PM

IF ANYONE should be offended, it’s WOMEN who are being depicted as preferring sex with apes over sex with men. As a woman, I’m offended by other women who get aroused by ape porn.

Brat on February 23, 2009 at 5:03 PM

Actually, the text is far more offensive/irritating than the goofy cartoon.

Marine_Bio on February 23, 2009 at 5:18 PM

Hard to draw the line about what is offensive after so many left-wing “Republicans” were hyperventillating over that “cross” in the back of a Huckabee ad. Anything to rig the primaries for McCain instead of putting up a candidate that might have been able to beat the filthy liar and do something to stop this national nightmare we are witnessing as the filthy liar and his corrupt party are using fear-mongering to fulfill 40 years of socialist initiatives.

So- Is the cartoon offensive? No. Am I pissed off at everybody who told me to STFU and vote for McCain instead of fighting back at the filthy liar that eventually won? Absolutely.

highhopes on February 23, 2009 at 5:19 PM

Only those with an inferiority complex concern themselves with the alleged superiority and sanctimony of others.

baldilocks on February 23, 2009 at 5:08 PM

I’ll keep this for next time someone throws a broom in my direction, for same reason s/he did to you.

It bothered me at the time, though imbecils deserve little attention. S/he is in hiding, or helping the deprived, those whom you and I “exploit”.

Entelechy on February 23, 2009 at 5:19 PM

“Take your stinking paws off me you damn dirty ape!”\

we are all lower primates now…

max1 on February 23, 2009 at 5:16 PM

Take your stinking paws off my money you filthy liar?

highhopes on February 23, 2009 at 5:20 PM

President Chimpy (aka Bush) had no comment…

right2bright on February 23, 2009 at 5:20 PM

With them apologizng and folding all the time I think they must have been bought by the French.

txaggie on February 23, 2009 at 5:21 PM

highhopes on February 23, 2009 at 5:19 PM

Your resentment lingers. Try a more positive message next time. You’ll come off sounding less like an petulant baboon child.

Abby Adams on February 23, 2009 at 5:23 PM

Monkey see, monkey do!

christene on February 23, 2009 at 5:23 PM

Hard to draw the line about what is offensive after so many left-wing “Republicans” were hyperventillating over that “cross” in the back of a Huckabee ad.

The reason people were hyperventilating is because he’d explicitly used the term “Christian leader” in an earlier ad. He had already made religion an overt basis for his candidacy. It’s not nutty to see subtext in ads after that.

Allahpundit on February 23, 2009 at 5:24 PM

So… do I need to apologize for having a “hope and change” button pinned to my daughter’s sock monkey doll?

anniekc on February 23, 2009 at 5:26 PM

It’s time to fess up. My 6-year old is a racist. He wasn’t raised that way, mind you, but maybe it’s just a gene thing. This morning I caught him watching a cartoon show on our local PBS station. And what I saw shocked, shocked me. The central character, a monkey which is owned by a white man in a safari outfit, was going about doing some really silly things and getting in trouble. And my kid was laughing, yes laughing, at the monkey. Of course, I turned off the TV and sent him to time-out. Right now I’m looking for an extended sensitivity training program for this little racist. Anybody else had this unfortunate Curious George type of problem?

TXUS on February 23, 2009 at 5:30 PM

If I were black, I’d be deeply offended that a newspaper would feel it has to apologize to me for showing a picture of an ape.

DrAllecon on February 23, 2009 at 4:54 PM

I thought that as well- The PC police are altogether too full of themselves.

anniekc on February 23, 2009 at 5:31 PM

TXUS on February 23, 2009 at 5:30 PM

My nephew has the same problem and I just don’t know what to do. I remember back when I was young I was a racist as well. I watched the “Great Grape Ape”. It was a large stupid ape who was OWNED by a white man. I saw the error of my ways so I moved to San Francisco so I could get properly indoctrinated.

txaggie on February 23, 2009 at 5:38 PM

I’m black, and what’s insulting to me is that WaPo has to apologize thinking I cannot look at a political cartoon and interpret the meaning. Some liberals of any color have to stop and think before they react. Oh yeah, it’s just a friggin cartoon!

Sanjoboy on February 23, 2009 at 5:38 PM

“The depiction of Dr. Condoleezza Rice by Jeff Danziger, Pat Oliphant and Garry Trudeau as an ebonics speaking, big-lipped, black mammy who just loves her ‘massa’ is a disturbing trend in editorial cartoons,” said Michelle D. Bernard, senior vice president of the Independent Women’s Forum. “These cartoons take the racism of the liberals who profess respect and adoration for black Americans to a new level. It is revolting.”

No apologies from these guys…and no demands from Sharpton…

right2bright on February 23, 2009 at 5:39 PM

Sanjoboy on February 23, 2009 at 5:38 PM

RACIST!! OREO!!

right2bright on February 23, 2009 at 5:40 PM

OK… when will someone have the huevos to actually draw The One as a chimp? That is the REAL question of the day.

BoomJunkie on February 23, 2009 at 5:40 PM

I confess.

I don’t get the cartoon.

Can someone explain? (not the monkey part).

wyntre on February 23, 2009 at 5:41 PM

RACIST!! OREO!!

right2bright on February 23, 2009 at 5:40 PM

Make it Double Stuff…..Yummy!

Sanjoboy on February 23, 2009 at 5:42 PM

txaggie on February 23, 2009 at 5:38 PM

If there are enough HA kid-racists like mine, maybe we can get a group rate for the sensitivity training.

TXUS on February 23, 2009 at 5:47 PM

I personally think this is an insult to all primates, if Rangel thinks this refers to Obama he is so wrong, Obama has bigger ears.:)

concernedsenior on February 23, 2009 at 6:04 PM

Aha. I wondered what Eric Holder was talking about when he called us a “nation of cowards” when it comes to race.

Slap my forehead…he was talkin’ about the Post!

jeanneb on February 23, 2009 at 6:09 PM

I am offended by the pre-apology. Apologize, WaPo!

rbj on February 23, 2009 at 4:32 PM

I am offend at your demand for an apology. Apologize, rbj.

Oops. I just offended myself…

Ugly on February 23, 2009 at 6:12 PM

Racist if you ‘Get It’

Racist if you don’t ‘Get It.’

Talk about your Win-Win.

TimBuk3 on February 23, 2009 at 6:13 PM

ChimpyMcObamahitler crushes freedom of expression!

Fascist AmeriKKKa!

profitsbeard on February 23, 2009 at 6:16 PM

such indignation over a cartoon? Where was all this outrage when Bush was called a chimp, a cockroach and a killer?

ObamatheMessiah on February 23, 2009 at 6:25 PM

I pray (God PLEEEZE) that South Park parodies this. Please please pleasepleaseplease

Ugly on February 23, 2009 at 6:32 PM

Let me officially and preemptively apologize for anything I will say, do or just think about saying or doing that might possibly–and probably in the mind of some PC wingnut–hurt someone’s feelings.

Now I feel better. Let the monkey business begin!

redfoxbluestate on February 23, 2009 at 6:49 PM

If Barry, as a” typical half black person” is offended by this? Perhaps he and brother Al should remember the hanging of Palin in California, which was protected as “art”. Amazing how silent Berry, brother Al and all those liberal were. This is just the start of pay/back to you spineless liberal pricks!
Maybe, just maybe, what goes around, is starting to come around?

Hey Al, how’s that Duke Lacrosse team gig working out for ya?

try again later on February 23, 2009 at 7:15 PM

WaPo preemptively apologizes for monkey cartoon

And the Obamamessiah said, “Then go forth and spread the news of my ascendancy and sin no more”.

MB4 on February 23, 2009 at 8:04 PM

WaPo is a newspaper in search of an excuse to play the race card. Suck it, WaPo. Just suck it.

Not too long from now, you’ll be down the drain with the NYT.

petefrt on February 23, 2009 at 8:27 PM

Why does anyone care what the liberals think? ChimpyOThadeus is a perfect description for Osime-a.

csdeven on February 23, 2009 at 8:39 PM

Sick of the race card ! Didn’t the left notice that a black man as President.?

But the racial tag game must go on! The left needs it because it feeds their political power painting the right as racist.

Its the same old game. Convince the poor and uneducated that the Dems really represent them . What a con job!

I always tell my black son in law, if the Dems really wanted equality , then why won’t they allow school vouchers ?

jerseyjoe99982002 on February 23, 2009 at 8:47 PM

Just to let you know… I buy the Washington Post, my African Grey poops on it…

M-14 2go on February 23, 2009 at 8:50 PM

How dare they make a cartoon portraying Obama as an ape who would steal white women from their white husbands!

RightWinged on February 23, 2009 at 9:14 PM

As a — Sundays only — subscriber to the Washington Post, I apologize for any offense the WaPo may have caused.

factoid on February 23, 2009 at 10:30 PM

This is actually the most humorous thing to emerge from a Gene Weingarten column.

I eagerly awaited his “humor” column every Sunday to marvel at how a guy could write so little each week and make it so unbelievably boring to boot.

Always with one little dig at President Bush, of course.

Weingarten is to humor, what the Post is to reporting.

You just wonder how they get paid at all for this stuff.

NoDonkey on February 23, 2009 at 10:33 PM

Really the obvious political cartoon given how much of this “We can’t say anything about Obama” garbage is basically showing a pro-obama crowd wanting someone burnt at the stake for heresy.

Dave_d on February 24, 2009 at 12:00 AM

Maybe the libs think. Say nothing to disgrace the office of the president, when the president is a disgrace.
Na

darktood on February 24, 2009 at 7:02 AM

Doesn’t anyone remember Bush being referred to as a CHIMP?

ctmom on February 24, 2009 at 9:15 AM

I suppose raccoons are now outlawed too?

Oink on February 24, 2009 at 10:00 AM

Doesn’t anyone remember Bush being referred to as a CHIMP?

ctmom on February 24, 2009 at 9:15 AM

Most definitely.

Oink on February 24, 2009 at 10:00 AM

Double standard? Here you go.

http://www.bushorchimp.com/

Oink on February 24, 2009 at 10:01 AM

Comment pages: 1 2