Sweet: Jindal rejects $98 million in stimulus money for Louisiana

posted at 8:30 pm on February 20, 2009 by Allahpundit

In one fell swoop, he’s stolen Sanford’s thunder as stimulus critic-in-chief. Risky, but I like it.

Louisiana Gov. Bobby Jindal announced Friday that he will decline stimulus money specifically targeted at expanding state unemployment insurance coverage, becoming the first state executive to officially refuse any part of the federal government’s payout to states…

“The federal money in this bill will run out in less than three years for this benefit and our businesses would then be stuck paying the bill,” Jindal said. “We must be careful and thoughtful as we examine all the strings attached to the funding in this package. We cannot grow government in an unsustainable way.”

NOLA says he’ll accept cash for transportation infrastructure and a modest increase in unemployment benefits but drew the line at unemployment insurance lest it mean a $12 million tax hike for Louisiana businesses three years from now. Needless to say, he’s out of the gate quickly on this for two reasons: to give him fiscal conservative bragging rights vis-a-vis Palin and the rest of the GOP’s rising stars, and of course to give the weekend talk shows a chance to buzz about him before his rebuttal to The One’s State of the Union on Tuesday night. The left will naturally hammer him for hating the poor — or, per Jim Clyburn, black people — but by framing it as a savings to businesses he can sell it as something that’ll produce more employment in the long run. Exit question: Good move or no?

Blowback

Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.

Trackbacks/Pings

Trackback URL

Comments

Comment pages: 1 2 3 5

Jindal 2012!

Laura in Maryland on February 20, 2009 at 8:32 PM

Racist!!

RadioFreeUSA on February 20, 2009 at 8:33 PM

Definitely, for all the reasons you said. He’s in a great position to give the SOTU rebuttal…IF he’s got an alternative that doesn’t sound like strict opposition.

warrenmr on February 20, 2009 at 8:33 PM

“We must be careful and thoughtful as we examine all the strings attached to the funding in this package. We cannot grow government in an unsustainable way.”

Looks like someone finally read the bill…………..

…………. good for you, Gov. Bobby Jindal, let’s see how Mr. Teleprompter chokes on this.

Seven Percent Solution on February 20, 2009 at 8:33 PM

Hopefully it isn’t just a cynical ploy at limelight-grabbing as described above, but rather an actual action based on conservative principle.

innominatus on February 20, 2009 at 8:34 PM

I see a visit to Iowa, say mid 2010

SouthernGent on February 20, 2009 at 8:34 PM

Has Sanford accepted or declined yet? And isn’t Perry also planning on declining?

Nelsen on February 20, 2009 at 8:35 PM

Nice. He might as well get used to fighting the Left now if he’s ever gonna run for Prez.

fiatboomer on February 20, 2009 at 8:35 PM

Straight to ACORN.

artist on February 20, 2009 at 8:35 PM

racist

rob verdi on February 20, 2009 at 8:36 PM

Help us, Obi-Jindal-Wan, you’re our only hope.

He’s for real, innominatus. I posted on another Jindal thread that I’m friends with a Trooper who does escort for him. I commented that he seems like a good guy. I was told that he is, and frugal. FROOOOOOOOOOOGAL.

Jindal 2012/16!

LickyLicky on February 20, 2009 at 8:37 PM

Admirable. I doubt he’ll be the only one.

Spirit of 1776 on February 20, 2009 at 8:37 PM

Excellent move.

Haley Barbour said something similar last week but it was on Fox Business Network so I doubt many people saw it. He said the additional unemployment and food stamp funds come with a lot of strings that folks in Mississipi would not approve of. For example the extra food stamp money comes with a string that states have to relax the work requirements for recipients. Talk about a recipe for long term unemployment!

rockmom on February 20, 2009 at 8:38 PM

Good move, though I suppose he could’ve taken the money and bought gold.

J.J. Sefton on February 20, 2009 at 8:38 PM

god will provide

tomas on February 20, 2009 at 8:38 PM

Excellent decision from a true fiscal conservative. Jindal is one to watch & he has my full attention.

Ris4victory on February 20, 2009 at 8:38 PM

Good for him. I live in Alabama and I hope Riley does the same thing.

suzyk on February 20, 2009 at 8:38 PM

Nice start. One only hopes that other states follow suit.

moxie_neanderthal on February 20, 2009 at 8:38 PM

The Governors can decline, but there is a new rule in the porkolicious stimulus that allows the legislatures to disregard the Governor’s wishes and request the stimulus funds anyway. So a governor can say No, but if the legislature says Yes, he has no power to stop it. This is dangerous, but hey!, nobody asked me what I thought about it.

shomegirl on February 20, 2009 at 8:39 PM

The kooks aren’t very happy:

http://www.dailykos.com/story/2009/2/20/201952/586/736/699971

Nelsen on February 20, 2009 at 8:39 PM

Holy Shit!

Jaibones on February 20, 2009 at 8:39 PM

A great move by an evil raaaaccciiiissssst.

cobrakai99 on February 20, 2009 at 8:39 PM

raaaaaaaaaaaaaaaacist

joey24007 on February 20, 2009 at 8:39 PM

Delicious for a Friday night.

Did you see this ad?

Entelechy on February 20, 2009 at 8:39 PM

Rockmom, maybe this is part of that interview:

In an interview Friday, Barbour said he, too, would likely decline funds for broadening access to unemployment insurance.

“Subject to learning more, my position is that Mississippi won’t accept funds that require us to have a tax increase later, because [they would force] us to change our rules for qualifying for unemployment compensation,” he said.

Spirit of 1776 on February 20, 2009 at 8:41 PM

Heh, Nelsen, the rats at the daily Pos “Let the people suffer, er eat cake”. What a bunch of fools.

Entelechy on February 20, 2009 at 8:41 PM

Awesome.

Even if this is nothing more than a grab at the limelight, Gov. Jindal is raising the bar for fiscal conservatives all over the nation. We complain about Democrats and liberals being generous with other people’s money (which is easy); even harder than resisting that impulse is to refuse to be part of a tragedy of the commons. Louisianans will still have to pay for the stimulus; their taxes will still go up; their investments will still suffer if we experience hyperinflation. Too many people have taken the attitude that, since they are paying for the pie and everyone else gets a slice, they may as well get a piece, too.

Good on Jindal. Let’s hope that other fiscal conservatives follow suit. Barack Obama, Nancy Pelosi, and Harry Reid will be left explaining why their “pork-free” stimulus bill is being rejected by the people it’s supposed to help.

Roxeanne de Luca on February 20, 2009 at 8:41 PM

What I’d really like to see is a governor refusing to send state employees’ tax dollars to D.C.

jgapinoy on February 20, 2009 at 8:41 PM

Damn good move. Not just for for politics, but more importantly to cut off a business & jobs choking tax increase.

And if any calls him a racist, he’ll get to claim racism back, as Indian-Americans are a smaller minority.

rbj on February 20, 2009 at 8:42 PM

Apparently there were no allocations for the levees…you know since Bush hates black people etc. So the dems. did not like the repub. gov. so they witheld payouts…Their payouts will probably be more personal….acorn, etc.
Acorn will then take money and kick every repub. out of office..

He didn’t have much to gain by accepting this 98 million.

Obama hates white people. People in KY froze to death…birds chirping…no fema no msm no obama………..

nondhimmie on February 20, 2009 at 8:44 PM

Exit question: Good move or no?

Are you crazy? I don’t live in LA, so it’s an awesome move.

LastRick on February 20, 2009 at 8:44 PM

God! I wish I lived in a state with a Republican Governor again!!! Instead, I get Jeremiah Jay Nixon who is like a kid in the candy store. Gimme! Gimme!

shomegirl on February 20, 2009 at 8:44 PM

Awesome move! This puts in at the top of my list of Republican candidates.

taney71 on February 20, 2009 at 8:44 PM

Exit question: Good move or no?

I don’t give a crap if it’s a good move. It’s the right move. I’ve had it up to my eyeballs with Republicans acting out of political expediency rather than logic or principle. Living in California, with a freaking girly-man Governor, an leftist legislature, and a Republican caucus that doesn’t have the gonads to stick to promises they made 3 months ago has me in a pitchfork mood. Heads on a stick is the order of the day.

peski on February 20, 2009 at 8:45 PM

Exit question: Good move or no?

I assume that’s a rhetorical question. :-)

This is great. It’s a good set-up for his rebuttal of Obama.

INC on February 20, 2009 at 8:45 PM

I love Jindal. And he did this in a very well thought out way. Accept some, but reject the rest. Leaving egg on the faces of those who support the stimulus. Because in the end this stimulus will run out of money for the projects and programs its creating, as a stepping stone to more socialism.

Jindal highlights this clearly and methodically, so no one can dismiss him and his point. And his legislature cannot overrule him, because he accepted some and rejected the part that would lead to higher taxes. Nice.

Hopefully other Governors will follow.

Elisa on February 20, 2009 at 8:45 PM

Sometimes it’s worth it to be named Bobby! And for Ray Nagin, THAT N-WORD a-hole Mayor of New Orleans to call this politics, NO SOUP FOR YOU CHOCOLATE CITY HEAD! SAME GOES FOR BAKLAVA BREATH AT KOS! SUCK IT!

BobAnthony on February 20, 2009 at 8:45 PM

Sanford, Jindal and Parry should all just take the federal money, convince Perdue, Barbour and Riley to do the same, secede and we have a nice start to being a country in the black, invite Crist to join if he wants too.

cadams on February 20, 2009 at 8:45 PM

The kooks aren’t very happy:

http://www.dailykos.com/story/2009/2/20/201952/586/736/699971

Nelsen on February 20, 2009 at 8:39 PM

This a great endorsement. If the barking lunatics at the Daily Kook can’t stand him then we know he’s got the right stuff.

Jindal
Palin
Cantor

These are the next crop of leaders that give me…well…hope!

RadioFreeUSA on February 20, 2009 at 8:46 PM

The kooks aren’t very happy:

http://www.dailykos.com/story/2009/2/20/201952/586/736/699971

Nelsen on February 20, 2009 at 8:39 PM

I read through the comments and they’re mad at him which probably means it’s the right call *IF* (and it’s the biggest if of all), he’s able to make something positive happen in LA while the U.S. struggles by comparison. If his state falters while the U.S. recovers, he better find somewhere to hide.

LastRick on February 20, 2009 at 8:48 PM

Can he actually do that? The following provision in the bailout legislation gives the final say to the legislature:

SEC. 1607. (a) CERTIFICATION BY GOVERNOR Not later than 45 days after the date of enactment of this Act, for funds provided to any State or agency thereof, the Governor of the State shall certify that: 1) the State request and use funds provided by this Act , and; 2) funds be used to create jobs and promote economic growth.

(b) ACCEPTANCE BY STATE LEGISLATURE If funds provided to any State in any division of this Act are not accepted for use by the Governor, then acceptance by the State legislature, by means of the adoption of a concurrent resolution, shall be sufficient to provide funding to such State.

paustin110 on February 20, 2009 at 8:48 PM

He has a rainy day fund and oil revenue which will go up.

Another State will get it.

getalife on February 20, 2009 at 8:48 PM

shomegirl on February 20, 2009 at 8:44 PM

Having a Republican governor is not guarantee. Gov. Crist of Florida practically kissed Pres. Obama square on the lips, he was so happy about this Bill.

Cindy Munford on February 20, 2009 at 8:48 PM

Smart move. Louisiana wasn’t getting jack to begin with and nobody seemed to mind anyway.

The state has already received about a fifth of what is going into the stimulus scam and Jindal surely knows better how to spend it.

JammieWearingFool on February 20, 2009 at 8:48 PM

Let him write a success story with this move. It will be nice to hear it played over and over again right through 2012. No nannies in Lousianna.

sherry on February 20, 2009 at 8:51 PM

Exclt move – though he’s not so much out in front as taking his turn after Sanford and Palin, and to a lesser extent Barbour and others, have each taken their own wack at whatever appropriate stage of the process. As more of the governors, including the above-named, rinse, wash, and repeat on these and similar issues, they’ll a) put the lie to the notion that Republican governors support Porkulissimus, b) each have a chance to dance in the limelight to the tune of fiscal responsibility, c) put the onus on those governors and other officials who aren’t reading the fine print.

God knows that stimulated small government/fiscal conservatives nationwide…

CK MacLeod on February 20, 2009 at 8:51 PM

Can he actually do that?
paustin110 on February 20, 2009 at 8:48 PM

I’ve read through that several times and unless I’m wrong (totally possible), part (a) does not mean the Governor has to take all of the money. Which is what Sanford has also hinted at; take only what you need and use it how YOU see fit (ie. tax breaks or shoring up budget deficits). This way part (b) does not go into effect, also known as Clyburn wasting all the money on entitlement programs.

LastRick on February 20, 2009 at 8:52 PM

Hopefully he starts a trend!

tx2654 on February 20, 2009 at 8:52 PM

Well done Jindal……keep those steely balls

LimeyGeek on February 20, 2009 at 8:52 PM

Romney, Jindal, Cantor…things are looking up for 2012.

JA on February 20, 2009 at 8:52 PM

Jindal’s Gulch!

huckleberryfriend on February 20, 2009 at 8:55 PM

I really admire what Jindal is doing. I think this is one of the bravest moves I’ve seen by a politician in a long time. He’s sticking by his principles in a challenging time and his neck is way out there.

I’d like to see this gentleman run against the messiah next time around….

Wine_N_Dine on February 20, 2009 at 8:55 PM

Good for Jindal.

I hope Sanford does something similar. The way I understand this offer of Fed money is that states must sign up “eligible” welfare candidates with some of the funds. That is probably the main reason Clyburn was howling about it. We have a large population here that loves welfare, and lately it’s been obvious with all the rockin’ and rollin’ that some folks are expecting that money to be delivered.

Man, I could write a book about this $hit.

Cody1991 on February 20, 2009 at 8:56 PM

it’s obvious he hates black people.

jjok on February 20, 2009 at 9:01 PM

He makes a broader point. The stimulus money is obviously temporary. It should have been written up with a clause outlining that ALL the money, once alotted, should be considered “found money” in any case that isnt involving covering an operating shortfall. It should be spent on growth and expansion of things like research and higher ed development. Not on sliding the metrics around on insurance calculations or other areas where businesses bear the significant burden.

Jindal proves shrewder than I think you give him credit for. That move right there can be sold as the kind of real world results of just the kind of “pragmatic, thoughtful leadership” Obama successfully ran on.

ernesto on February 20, 2009 at 9:01 PM

I hope all the Repub Govs do the same…. let’s send a message to President Government that the Crap Sandwich ain’t so tasty….

BPD on February 20, 2009 at 9:01 PM

Awesome, other states will make use of those funds. Jindal’s popularity is pretty high so these decisions can only have a potentially net negative for him. Alot of these city mayors seem to have a lot of valuable projects lined up and I’m sure more than a few LA mayors are PISSED right now. It’s a little tough to get votes out of a city who’s machine isn’t excited about you cutting off federal funds that other states are getting.

DeathToMediaHacks on February 20, 2009 at 9:02 PM

Good move, especially on partial. CD media will make noise but not so much. “Which part of the baby do you want?”

This is just part of the reaction.

Flying Gadsden

Caststeel on February 20, 2009 at 9:03 PM

Enriching and inspiring article about Gov. Jindal.

Teh, heh, DTMH, like flies on shiite…

Entelechy on February 20, 2009 at 9:04 PM

Not sure if gop in Baton Rouge will vote against him but should be interesting to watch.

Turning down any money with New Orleans still not rebuilt is risky and probably a loser.

getalife on February 20, 2009 at 9:04 PM

Bobby Jindal doesn’t care about black people……..or something…

SoxNation on February 20, 2009 at 9:04 PM

It’s a great move, and goes a long way toward making up for the fact that three weeks ago he had his hand outstretched for whatever $$$ Washington was willing to send him. And he may be the first governor to officially turn down (some of) the cash, but the Cuda was out of the gate four days ago on this particular issue of the dangers of creating unfunded mandates that, once the federal money dries up, states won’t be able to maintain. She didn’t specifically say she would refuse the money, but the fact that she thought to mention it, and that she specifically requested only $150 million for five projects relating to the gas pipeline and the Kodiak launch facility, makes me think she probably intends to do the same thing. If Jindal stole anyone’s thunder, it’s Palin’s. She planted the seed on Monday and now it’s starting to germinate.

But it doesn’t really matter I suppose. Whatever it takes to force these guys to find their stones and refuse the pork.

NoLeftTurn on February 20, 2009 at 9:05 PM

Excellent move on Jindal’s part. He has pointed to the main problem of Obamanomics……..it’s not sustainable without more infusion of tax dollars. It doesn’t stimulate anything but growth of government.

GarandFan on February 20, 2009 at 9:06 PM

DeathToMediaHacks on February 20, 2009 at 9:02 PM

These are unemployment bennies, not construction or howsomever. Your argument needs redirection.

Flying Gadsden

Caststeel on February 20, 2009 at 9:06 PM

Awesome, other states will make use of those funds.
DeathToMediaHacks on February 20, 2009 at 9:02 PM

Knew it wouldn’t be too long before you showed up. Care to point out in Sec 1607 where it says funds not used go to other states? Or are you just saying that because it’s what you expect the liberal governors to do — take, take, take other people’s money?

LastRick on February 20, 2009 at 9:06 PM

The best part about this is it gives Jindal the opportunity to explain that these funds, as with everything with the federal government, comes with BIG strings and an even bigger bill in the future.

Good on em’.

Sugar Land on February 20, 2009 at 9:06 PM

Go Bobby!

baldilocks on February 20, 2009 at 9:09 PM

BOBBY – WE NEED YOU!!!

RobCon on February 20, 2009 at 9:09 PM

GarandFan on February 20, 2009 at 9:06 PM

Just so.

Flying Gadsden

Caststeel on February 20, 2009 at 9:09 PM

I hope my governor, Haley Barbour, follows suit. He’s the man.

seaplanes on February 20, 2009 at 9:11 PM

DeathToMediaHacks on February 20, 2009 at 9:02 PM

There’s no way this will be a net negative for Bobby. That pork of a stimulus bill is all tied up with strings.

This is going to be a net negative for Obama.

INC on February 20, 2009 at 9:13 PM

Jindal
Palin
Cantor

These are the next crop of leaders that give me…well…hope!

RadioFreeUSA on February 20, 2009 at 8:46 PM

Indians, wimmens and Joos, oh my!

The Left hates them. That should be enough reason to support them.

baldilocks on February 20, 2009 at 9:13 PM

Smart move. Louisiana wasn’t getting jack to begin with and nobody seemed to mind anyway.

The state has already received about a fifth of what is going into the stimulus scam and Jindal surely knows better how to spend it.

JammieWearingFool on February 20, 2009 at 8:48 PM

Liberals only care about New Orleans when its politically convienent. They make a big deal how Bush was evil and let New Orleans flood but not a damn one of them have come over here and invest in the city unless its for PR.

Right now nobody outside Louisiana is talking about the state the city is in and NOLA Democrats think Obama will take care of them. The problem with NOLA Dems is that they vote for people who have consistently fleeced them for years. Look at who’ve they put in power: Nagin, Morial, and Jefferson. All of them incompetant and corrupt. Mary Landrieu wouldn’t be a Senator right now if it wasn’t for this voting block.

The city council fights with each other and never gets anything done. One city council member yesterday claimed that white and blacks don’t trust each other in the city. You know what this was over? Transparency of government contracts because Nagin decided to make contract awards secret. How the hell is that a race thing?

The electorate in New Orleans is too stupid to realize they are getting screwed. Now some ministers want Cao out of office for voting no for the stimulus. The Times-Picayune reported that the 2nd district, which is most of New Orleans and a few suburbs, would get the least benefit in the bill.

I’m glad Jindal refused the money. He’s been trying to get more businesses here to create jobs. Last thing he needs is to have an unbusiness like string attached that scares companies and jobs away from the state.

Lay-Z on February 20, 2009 at 9:15 PM

Can he actually do that? The following provision in the bailout legislation gives the final say to the legislature:

SEC. 1607. (a) CERTIFICATION BY GOVERNOR Not later than 45 days after the date of enactment of this Act, for funds provided to any State or agency thereof, the Governor of the State shall certify that: 1) the State request and use funds provided by this Act , and; 2) funds be used to create jobs and promote economic growth.

(b) ACCEPTANCE BY STATE LEGISLATURE If funds provided to any State in any division of this Act are not accepted for use by the Governor, then acceptance by the State legislature, by means of the adoption of a concurrent resolution, shall be sufficient to provide funding to such State.

I wonder if you can fight this and claim sovereign state rights?

Like Texas just did.

WHEREAS, The Tenth Amendment to the Constitution of the United States reads as follows: “The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people”;
and

WHEREAS, The Tenth Amendment defines the total scope of federal power as being that specifically granted by the Constitution of the United States and no more; and

WHEREAS, The scope of power defined by the Tenth Amendment means that the federal government was created by the states specifically to be an agent of the states; and

WHEREAS, Today, in 2009, the states are demonstrably treated as agents of the federal government; and

WHEREAS, Many federal laws are directly in violation of the Tenth Amendment to the Constitution of the United States; and

WHEREAS, The Tenth Amendment assures that we, the people of the United States of America and each sovereign state in the Union of States, now have, and have always had, rights the federal government may not usurp; and

WHEREAS, Section 4, Article IV, of the Constitution says, “The United States shall guarantee to every State in this Union a Republican Form of Government,” and the Ninth Amendment states that “The enumeration in the Constitution, of certain rights, shall not be construed to deny or disparage others retained by the people” and

WHEREAS, The United States Supreme Court has ruled in New York v. United States, 112 S. Ct. 2408 (1992), that congress may not simply commandeer the legislative and regulatory processes of the states; and

WHEREAS, A number of proposals from previous administrations and some now pending from the present administration and from congress may further violate the Constitution of the United States; now, therefore, be it

RESOLVED, That the 81st Legislature of the State of Texas hereby claim sovereignty under the Tenth Amendment to the Constitution of the United States over all powers not otherwise enumerated and granted to the federal government by the Constitution of the United States; and, be it further

RESOLVED, That this serve as notice and demand to the federal government, as our agent, to cease and desist, effective immediately, mandates that are beyond the scope of these constitutionally delegated powers; and, be it further

RESOLVED, That all compulsory federal legislation that directs states to comply under threat of civil or criminal penalties or sanctions or that requires states to pass legislation or lose federal funding be prohibited or repealed; and, be it further

RESOLVED, That the Texas secretary of state forward official copies of this resolution to the president of the United States, to the speaker of the house of representatives and the president of the senate of the United States Congress, and to all the members of the Texas delegation to the congress with the request that this resolution be officially entered in the Congressional Record as a memorial to the Congress of the United States of America.

http://www.legis.state.tx.us/tlodocs/81R/billtext/html/HC00050I.htm

izoneguy on February 20, 2009 at 9:16 PM

I’m convinced. Jindal 2012.

JohnJ on February 20, 2009 at 9:16 PM

Sarah? Sarah!

Are you listening?

turfmann on February 20, 2009 at 9:16 PM

Actions speak louder than words

Its also a States Rights issue …. a good statement for the rebutal of the State of the Union

Just in time for Mardi Gras too ….

Cromagnum on February 20, 2009 at 9:17 PM

SUCH a good move. This is my guy in 2012.

fiscallyconservative on February 20, 2009 at 9:17 PM

The Left hates them. That should be enough reason to support them.

baldilocks on February 20, 2009 at 9:13 PM

Du liebe, du gute, du schlimme, du :)

Entelechy on February 20, 2009 at 9:17 PM

Bobby Jindal / 2012!!!!
Deal with it Obambi!

RobCon on February 20, 2009 at 9:17 PM

Clyburns ammendment to the stimulus allows the State Legislature to override a Governors denial of any funds offered from the stimulus. Ray Nagen was at the Mayors conference in DC today where he made a statement to the press anticipating this move by Jindal. The link is a web extra on page 2 Nagen is speaker 2

sonnyspats1 on February 20, 2009 at 9:17 PM

Well done Jindal……keep those steely balls

LimeyGeek on February 20, 2009 at 8:52 PM

He is one republican who has proven he has them and does not shrink from a fight. On top of that he has a very well developed conservative philosophy which he can articulate very clearly. Just needs sometimes to be careful not to sound too technical in his speeches but rather more inspiring to the average, less informed, voter and he’ll be a major force in national politics.

neuquenguy on February 20, 2009 at 9:18 PM

RadioFreeUSA on February 20, 2009 at 8:46 PM

baldilocks on February 20, 2009 at 9:13 PM

Add in the Man of Steele, and we’re one lion away from Voltron.

Kid from Brooklyn on February 20, 2009 at 9:18 PM

I don’t know, I am always suspicious of politicians and the sleight of hand…..the legislature can override him in this decision if they get enough votes.

shomegirl on February 20, 2009 at 9:18 PM

AWESOME!

If anyone knows of any protests in GA, NC, or TN -please let me know….georgia owl at (a gmail addy). If I don’t find a protest in GA this weekend I’m going to try and organize one myself for next weekend. I’ll need some help….it seems we’re not as fired up here as everyone else – or we just haven’t connected with each other yet. i’m so sick and tired of talking about it…let’s DO something.

OwlorNothing on February 20, 2009 at 9:20 PM

Ray Nagen is going to whine like a grown up in diapers.

Entelechy on February 20, 2009 at 9:20 PM

I really would be more impressed if he actually had the balls to refuse ALL federal moneys

Since this would send a real messaqge..
but still its an ok start..

jcila on February 20, 2009 at 9:20 PM

I sure hope my Governor here in the great state of California does the same!!!
….oh wait….

SoxNation on February 20, 2009 at 9:20 PM

And isn’t Perry also planning on declining?

I think our illustrious Guv has bowed to pressure (not sure from where exactly) and will be snatching up everything. For all his talk…

Good for Jindal! It’s not that he is denying his state everything, but pointing out that with unemployment insurance, it just isn’t worth the cost. If he can use his popularity to make his case to the state, he will be ok and maybe even cheered; but he has to get out in front with this and let them know that there are damned good reasons to say no. I am proud of the guy (and I’m one of those Palin/Jindal fans!)

XWing5 on February 20, 2009 at 9:20 PM

Raaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaacists:
LINK

In a statement coordinated by South Carolina Gov. Mark Sanford, who chairs the Republican Governors Association, Sanford, Barbour, Louisiana Gov. Bobby Jindal, Texas Gov. Rick Perry and Alaska Gov. Sarah Palin took a hard line against what they termed debt-increasing measures in the proposed economic recovery bill.

“I am seriously concerned by the large amount of debt being created by this legislation,” said Jindal, “that will be passed down to our children and our grandchildren.”

Palin said in the statement she worried some of the bill’s spending wouldn’t effectively address the economic crisis.

“My fear is that, as written, we are only pouring more dollars into federal programs that will become unfunded mandates for states to continue funding for generations,” Palin said. “None of us can afford that.”

The former vice presidential candidate acknowledged, however: “It’s a given that a stimulus package is needed and will happen.”

joey24007 on February 20, 2009 at 9:21 PM

Excellent move!

What the Governors should do other than out right rejection of the $ is to give it back to tax payers only in their perspective states.
That would be a slap in the face to Obama’s wealth redistribution plan.

katy on February 20, 2009 at 9:21 PM

If Palin could teach him how to give a speech or have a little charisma, he’d be all set.

Snark aside, good for him. I like to see the GOP developing a deep bench. Go, Bobby!

Jim62sch on February 20, 2009 at 9:22 PM

I’m convinced. Jindal 2012.

JohnJ on February 20, 2009 at 9:16 PM

He is right now my number one choice. I like Palin very much as well, but I get the sense that Jindal has an edge in terms of explaining the conservative principles underpinning his policy positions.

neuquenguy on February 20, 2009 at 9:23 PM

Good job Jindal! Keep it up, don’t look back. Onward & upward.

portlandon on February 20, 2009 at 9:24 PM

Oh Bobby! Love the man. What a conservative!

jencab on February 20, 2009 at 9:25 PM

What if Kalifornia had a Jindal? We can dream, can’t we. The closest we’re going to get is Ms. eBay.

pugwriter on February 20, 2009 at 9:25 PM

The only reason that Palin didn’t get called a racist for turning down Porkulus money is that P Diddy says there are no black people in Alaska.

Jim62sch on February 20, 2009 at 9:25 PM

Comment pages: 1 2 3 5