Pirate Radio would Welcome him!

Pelosi, et al are nothing but a bunch of Stalinists attempting to impose their will and only their views upon the rest of us.

Radio stations will not go out of business!! That is patently false. Heck, I’ve identified a need here in Southern California – we definitely need those talk radio stations to play Mexican music. There just aren’t enough of those out here now, especially on the AM band.

NTropy on February 20, 2009 at 7:08 PM

Umm, since you’re in SoCal, aren’t those Mexican music stations among those things that have been outsourced to a country with lower wages?

Rovin – I am with you on the ground-swell on the national level and I hope to be in on the forefront with you.

“I am invisioning this ground-swell again on a national scale.

Rovin on February 20, 2009 at 2:38 PM”

Da Bama cannot be happy that Rush is putting him on the spot. Gotta love Rush.

Obama just said that he opposes a reimposition of the Fairness Doctrine, but wants to impose diversity through other means, such as new ownership rules and the like.

Isn’t that how we got into this mortgage crisis?

Rush to Obama: Declare yourself on free political speech

Rush Limbaugh throws down another challenge to Barack Obama on the pages of the Wall Street Journal,
this time on the Fairness Doctrine — and any other attempts to limit
political speech…..

MB4 has it right, Obama = Mussolini.

Geministorm on February 20, 2009 at 4:26 PM

But will the masses claim, as they falsely claimed about Mussolini, that Obama made the trains run on time?

[Presupposing that we will have trains running at all in a few months.]

Does Obama support free political speech and the marketplace? Or does he support the notion of government dictating political content of broadcasts? That’s the real question.

Hahahahahahahaha…are you seriously asking this question, or is it rhetorical?

EVERY action that President Obama has taken since entering office should guide you, even if you ignore all of his actions and words prior to the election, to the conclusion that he wants to stifle dissenting opinions and secure control over government to the National Socialists…err, Democratic party. By having the FCC utilize “local content” rules, the 1st Amendment can be successfully circumvented without ever taking a bill before Congress. And once its done, what federally appointed judge is going to take the case and rule in favor of Free Speech for citizens?

Waxman and the FCC will soon have complete control over the radio airwaves and the internet. Just check out what Waxman has been saying recently, they won’t stop at just talk radio, they are going to take on the internet as well. I’m guessing no one sees any kind of similarity to China…

MB4 has it right, Obama = Mussolini.

Rush to Obama: Declare yourself on free political speech

In order to save free speech I must destroy it.
- Barackito Obamolini

His resume is a complete fraud affirmative-action, literay masterpiece!

DrStock on February 20, 2009 at 3:29 PM

C’mon, give the guy a break. He’s so impo’tent that he penned two autobiographies before the age of forty-five. And there has not been a single interview with him concerning their arguably racist content. He can’t use the ‘he only sat in the church for 20 years but never heard racist comments’ excuse; the books have his name on the front cover.

Bottom line is that we don’t know much about BO. That was by design, and if you ask any questions, you’re a racist. Pretty obvious, isn’t it?

Also, he’s on the road and probably will be for much of his term. BO is a mouthpiece. That’s all. Now, who is really in charge? That’s what I want to know.

Time to start buying pitchforks, laterns, and ammo.

socaworld on February 20, 2009 at 3:23 PM

I dream about this . . . and living in a bunker.

If Obama was a scholar he would have written scholarly work. He has not done so, even though he was the “editor” of the Harvard Law Review.
They say this is because he didn’t want to leave an “ideological trail”. I’m sure his writings were too radical for even that Harvard rag.

RepubChica on February 20, 2009 at 3:10 PM

I don’t believe he has ever written anything scholarly, radical or not. I think he is a fraud, and by no measure is he a constitutional scholar. (Actually, I think he is a fraud on several front, but don’t want to go OT)

This is a complete joke! If an adjunct professor at any university ever claimed to be a professor, he would be laughed off the faculty.

DrStock on February 20, 2009 at 2:44 PM
Which is exactly why I don’t go round telling people I’m an adjunct professor, either.
I don’t exactly think it’s a big deal.

Badger40 on February 20, 2009 at 3:11 PM

Another fine example of 0′s hubris. He taught a single course at U of Chi! That is not even REMOTELY close to being a professor. His resume is a complete fraud!

Free speech provisions were part of the initial Federal Communications Law waaaay back in 1934. There have been incursions into free speech in broadcasting, but in limited-yet-controversial areas (obscenity/indecency, children’s commercials, etc.), but never a wholesale suppression/intimidation of free speech the way the administration is planning.

There is nothing Fair about the Fairness Doctrine; it is an Orwellian term. The organized Left will use it as a club to destroy individual freedoms.

Time to start buying pitchforks, laterns, and ammo.

I feel like this whole country is going off the rails on a crazy train… and I WANT OFF!

Chaz706 on February 20, 2009 at 3:17 PM

Sure seems that way, but I feel pretty optimistic today. I think it’s dawning on people that President Obama is exactly what we said he would be. It’s like he stepped out of a 1930′s era newsreel, he’s got the commie smirk, the arrogance, the threatening rhetoric, the whole works. I feel pretty confident that his appalling style will continue to disgust the voters and lead to an overwhelming defeat at the congressional polls in 2010.