<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Pethokoukis: Savior-based economics</title>
	<atom:link href="http://hotair.com/archives/2009/02/19/pethokoukis-savior-based-economics/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/02/19/pethokoukis-savior-based-economics/</link>
	<description>The world’s first, full-service conservative Internet broadcast network</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 30 May 2012 14:59:22 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Conan</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/02/19/pethokoukis-savior-based-economics/comment-page-2/#comment-1898813</link>
		<dc:creator>Conan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Feb 2009 06:53:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=44503#comment-1898813</guid>
		<description>Good post ED I like that you point out people were overextended. If someone agreed to a $2000.00 payment and that payment didn&#039;t change then where is the excuse for not having the $2000.00 now? You can say unemployment but the real jobs didn&#039;t get hit till recently and going from say 5.6% to 7.6% is still only 2% of the people flipping into umemployment over the previous rate. There HAS to be so many people who just don&#039;t like the fact they are paying $2000.00 and getting no equity at the moment. That or they never really planned to pay that money because otherwise where is their planned $2000.00 payment? I saw some ACORN rep on Cavuto and she said that she didn&#039;t know anybody like that. Huh? I swear that ACORN is the devil&#039;s workshop.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good post ED I like that you point out people were overextended. If someone agreed to a $2000.00 payment and that payment didn&#8217;t change then where is the excuse for not having the $2000.00 now? You can say unemployment but the real jobs didn&#8217;t get hit till recently and going from say 5.6% to 7.6% is still only 2% of the people flipping into umemployment over the previous rate. There HAS to be so many people who just don&#8217;t like the fact they are paying $2000.00 and getting no equity at the moment. That or they never really planned to pay that money because otherwise where is their planned $2000.00 payment? I saw some ACORN rep on Cavuto and she said that she didn&#8217;t know anybody like that. Huh? I swear that ACORN is the devil&#8217;s workshop.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sam Adams</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/02/19/pethokoukis-savior-based-economics/comment-page-2/#comment-1898145</link>
		<dc:creator>Sam Adams</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Feb 2009 02:17:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=44503#comment-1898145</guid>
		<description>Many people have said that our children and grandchildren will pay the price for all of this porkulus/stimulus spending.  I used to think that.  BUT, remember who voted this idiot into office...that&#039;s right.  The children!  This is what we get for allwoing children to vote.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Many people have said that our children and grandchildren will pay the price for all of this porkulus/stimulus spending.  I used to think that.  BUT, remember who voted this idiot into office&#8230;that&#8217;s right.  The children!  This is what we get for allwoing children to vote.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: moxie_neanderthal</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/02/19/pethokoukis-savior-based-economics/comment-page-2/#comment-1897901</link>
		<dc:creator>moxie_neanderthal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Feb 2009 01:16:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=44503#comment-1897901</guid>
		<description>There is absolutely &lt;strong&gt;NO&lt;/strong&gt; substitute for the market to establish a clearing price for real estate. The sheer size of the market means that no matter how much money it flushes down the toilet it cannot meaningfully prop up real estate prices, nor should it. 

Unfortunately, this also means that Barry and the gang will continue to careen through the wilderness, throwing good money after bad until a Darwinian flush occurs.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There is absolutely <strong>NO</strong> substitute for the market to establish a clearing price for real estate. The sheer size of the market means that no matter how much money it flushes down the toilet it cannot meaningfully prop up real estate prices, nor should it. </p>
<p>Unfortunately, this also means that Barry and the gang will continue to careen through the wilderness, throwing good money after bad until a Darwinian flush occurs.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Spectreman</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/02/19/pethokoukis-savior-based-economics/comment-page-2/#comment-1897714</link>
		<dc:creator>Spectreman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Feb 2009 00:24:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=44503#comment-1897714</guid>
		<description>Man this new president sucks.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Man this new president sucks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dr. ZhivBlago</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/02/19/pethokoukis-savior-based-economics/comment-page-2/#comment-1897360</link>
		<dc:creator>Dr. ZhivBlago</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Feb 2009 22:38:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=44503#comment-1897360</guid>
		<description>As time goes on, the argument of &quot;Well, I&#039;ve been paying my mortgage religiously&quot; wears more and more thin.  It&#039;s true, but more of us are going to be in the same fix even though we weren&#039;t part of the CRE-induced mortgage mess.

Because of Frank and the other &#039;chicken-in-every-pot&#039; Communists, this has gotten so out of hand as to cause people to lose their jobs (and thus their homes), and caused the excessive devaluation of the homes we have now.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As time goes on, the argument of &#8220;Well, I&#8217;ve been paying my mortgage religiously&#8221; wears more and more thin.  It&#8217;s true, but more of us are going to be in the same fix even though we weren&#8217;t part of the CRE-induced mortgage mess.</p>
<p>Because of Frank and the other &#8216;chicken-in-every-pot&#8217; Communists, this has gotten so out of hand as to cause people to lose their jobs (and thus their homes), and caused the excessive devaluation of the homes we have now.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BlameAmericaLast</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/02/19/pethokoukis-savior-based-economics/comment-page-2/#comment-1897283</link>
		<dc:creator>BlameAmericaLast</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Feb 2009 22:13:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=44503#comment-1897283</guid>
		<description>How does this help Michelle Obama&#039;s children?   &gt;.&lt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How does this help Michelle Obama&#8217;s children?   &gt;.&lt;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: &#8220;President Obama, are you listening?&#8221; &#124; Cold Fury</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/02/19/pethokoukis-savior-based-economics/comment-page-1/#comment-1897124</link>
		<dc:creator>&#8220;President Obama, are you listening?&#8221; &#124; Cold Fury</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Feb 2009 21:21:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=44503#comment-1897124</guid>
		<description>[...] and a new politics, and all that mumble-mumble folderol. That&#8217;s what power and control of a savior-based economy is all about, see.  Category: Second Coming &amp;#9830 [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] and a new politics, and all that mumble-mumble folderol. That&#8217;s what power and control of a savior-based economy is all about, see.  Category: Second Coming &amp;#9830 [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ColtsFan</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/02/19/pethokoukis-savior-based-economics/comment-page-1/#comment-1897021</link>
		<dc:creator>ColtsFan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Feb 2009 20:58:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=44503#comment-1897021</guid>
		<description>Excellent post, Ed.

I really enjoyed reading this.  The negative effects of &quot;Hope and Change&quot; will lead straight to socialism-Venzuela style- economics for the USA.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Excellent post, Ed.</p>
<p>I really enjoyed reading this.  The negative effects of &#8220;Hope and Change&#8221; will lead straight to socialism-Venzuela style- economics for the USA.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Califemme</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/02/19/pethokoukis-savior-based-economics/comment-page-1/#comment-1896979</link>
		<dc:creator>Califemme</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Feb 2009 20:48:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=44503#comment-1896979</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;When does the revolution begin?

NoLeftTurn on February 19, 2009 at 1:39 PM&lt;/blockquote&gt;

&lt;strong&gt;April 15th, 2009&lt;/strong&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>When does the revolution begin?</p>
<p>NoLeftTurn on February 19, 2009 at 1:39 PM</p></blockquote>
<p><strong>April 15th, 2009</strong></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hard Starboard</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/02/19/pethokoukis-savior-based-economics/comment-page-1/#comment-1896739</link>
		<dc:creator>Hard Starboard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Feb 2009 20:03:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=44503#comment-1896739</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Chicken Little Politics...&lt;/strong&gt;

Via Powerline: Earlier this evening, my wife had the Hannity show on television as she was working on dinner, and Sean showed clips of Barack Obama talking about his mortgage plan in which he used the word &quot;crisis&quot; probably&#160;twenty or&#160;thirty...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Chicken Little Politics&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>Via Powerline: Earlier this evening, my wife had the Hannity show on television as she was working on dinner, and Sean showed clips of Barack Obama talking about his mortgage plan in which he used the word &#8220;crisis&#8221; probably&nbsp;twenty or&nbsp;thirty&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sannhet</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/02/19/pethokoukis-savior-based-economics/comment-page-1/#comment-1896711</link>
		<dc:creator>sannhet</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Feb 2009 19:59:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=44503#comment-1896711</guid>
		<description>The Obama is in the details.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Obama is in the details.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rockmom</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/02/19/pethokoukis-savior-based-economics/comment-page-1/#comment-1896592</link>
		<dc:creator>rockmom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Feb 2009 19:35:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=44503#comment-1896592</guid>
		<description>It won&#039;t help a lot of people in California because their loan amounts are too high.  The program applies only to &quot;coforming&quot; loans that are within the Fannie/Freddie loan limits.  Right now that&#039;s $417,000.  So those poor saps who bought the $700,000 McMansions in Riverside with the no-down interest-only loans are still screwed.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It won&#8217;t help a lot of people in California because their loan amounts are too high.  The program applies only to &#8220;coforming&#8221; loans that are within the Fannie/Freddie loan limits.  Right now that&#8217;s $417,000.  So those poor saps who bought the $700,000 McMansions in Riverside with the no-down interest-only loans are still screwed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: NoLeftTurn</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/02/19/pethokoukis-savior-based-economics/comment-page-1/#comment-1896296</link>
		<dc:creator>NoLeftTurn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Feb 2009 18:39:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=44503#comment-1896296</guid>
		<description>Doesn&#039;t this plan already exist?  It&#039;s called a short-sale.

Just taking one market as an example . . . How would this scheme help, say, a middle-class person living in Southern California?  Prices there have dropped drastically of course, but still not enough to put even a modest home within reach of most working families.  $700,000 for a 2 BR, 1200 square foot shack (a term I do not use loosely) in Los Angeles?  This is INSANITY.  Certainly prices will never be in California what they are in other parts of the country b/c land is finite and so many people want to live in the Golden State.  But the market was more competitive in the early 90s after the last bubble burst, and I think it&#039;s safe to say that&#039;s because Washington wasn&#039;t meddling and artificially keeping prices high.  If they would stay out of it again this time, and let the people who can&#039;t afford to pay just default or work out their own terms with the lenders, eventually prices would settle at a place where people could start buying again and getting conventional loans to finance.  At the other end of the spectrum, I have a piece of property in Florida that I own outright.  I would dearly love to sell it, but no one is buying. Of course, I don&#039;t qualify for any &quot;help&quot; because I&#039;m not upside down on the house.  But the schmoes down the street who are, are gonna get a bail out.

This Plan o&#039; Salvation for homeowners is NOT going to make homeownership more attainable -- it&#039;s going to do the opposite.  And once again, those of us who follow the rules, who don&#039;t get in over our heads, who have enough in the way of basic arithmetic skills to figure out that we can&#039;t afford to fritter half our take home pay away on a mortgage, get stuck holding the bag.

When does the revolution begin?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Doesn&#8217;t this plan already exist?  It&#8217;s called a short-sale.</p>
<p>Just taking one market as an example . . . How would this scheme help, say, a middle-class person living in Southern California?  Prices there have dropped drastically of course, but still not enough to put even a modest home within reach of most working families.  $700,000 for a 2 BR, 1200 square foot shack (a term I do not use loosely) in Los Angeles?  This is INSANITY.  Certainly prices will never be in California what they are in other parts of the country b/c land is finite and so many people want to live in the Golden State.  But the market was more competitive in the early 90s after the last bubble burst, and I think it&#8217;s safe to say that&#8217;s because Washington wasn&#8217;t meddling and artificially keeping prices high.  If they would stay out of it again this time, and let the people who can&#8217;t afford to pay just default or work out their own terms with the lenders, eventually prices would settle at a place where people could start buying again and getting conventional loans to finance.  At the other end of the spectrum, I have a piece of property in Florida that I own outright.  I would dearly love to sell it, but no one is buying. Of course, I don&#8217;t qualify for any &#8220;help&#8221; because I&#8217;m not upside down on the house.  But the schmoes down the street who are, are gonna get a bail out.</p>
<p>This Plan o&#8217; Salvation for homeowners is NOT going to make homeownership more attainable &#8212; it&#8217;s going to do the opposite.  And once again, those of us who follow the rules, who don&#8217;t get in over our heads, who have enough in the way of basic arithmetic skills to figure out that we can&#8217;t afford to fritter half our take home pay away on a mortgage, get stuck holding the bag.</p>
<p>When does the revolution begin?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: technopeasant</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/02/19/pethokoukis-savior-based-economics/comment-page-1/#comment-1896129</link>
		<dc:creator>technopeasant</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Feb 2009 18:21:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=44503#comment-1896129</guid>
		<description>You know who the Messiah and his disciples remind me of; ironically the Pharisees, who orchestrated the crucifixion of Christ. Substitute &#039;not healing on the Sabbath&#039; for Mary Landrieu&#039;s statement that &#039;the age of individual empowerment is dead&#039;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You know who the Messiah and his disciples remind me of; ironically the Pharisees, who orchestrated the crucifixion of Christ. Substitute &#8216;not healing on the Sabbath&#8217; for Mary Landrieu&#8217;s statement that &#8216;the age of individual empowerment is dead&#8217;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alana</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/02/19/pethokoukis-savior-based-economics/comment-page-1/#comment-1895877</link>
		<dc:creator>Alana</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Feb 2009 17:37:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=44503#comment-1895877</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;Ed,
correct me if I’m wrong, but isn’t there another provision which will allow judges to adjust the PRINCIPAL as well? That would even more devastating&lt;/blockquote&gt;.

Having dinner last night, we heard on TV something about the government paying up to $1,000 on the principle each year.

I said to my husband, how can we get them to give us $1,000 a year off our principle?  Cause that would be sweet.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Ed,<br />
correct me if I’m wrong, but isn’t there another provision which will allow judges to adjust the PRINCIPAL as well? That would even more devastating</p></blockquote>
<p>.</p>
<p>Having dinner last night, we heard on TV something about the government paying up to $1,000 on the principle each year.</p>
<p>I said to my husband, how can we get them to give us $1,000 a year off our principle?  Cause that would be sweet.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rae</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/02/19/pethokoukis-savior-based-economics/comment-page-1/#comment-1895848</link>
		<dc:creator>Rae</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Feb 2009 17:31:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=44503#comment-1895848</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;“It kills me that the Dems seem to think the right to healthcare is in the Constitution…BUT the right to life is not.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Considering their &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601039&amp;refer=columnist_mccaughey&amp;sid=aLzfDxfbwhzs&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;HIT Squad&lt;/a&gt; will be killing off the elderly (and all of us) to save money for the good of the collective, it&#039;s not really that much of a contradiction, is it?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>“It kills me that the Dems seem to think the right to healthcare is in the Constitution…BUT the right to life is not.</p></blockquote>
<p>Considering their <a href="http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601039&amp;refer=columnist_mccaughey&amp;sid=aLzfDxfbwhzs" rel="nofollow">HIT Squad</a> will be killing off the elderly (and all of us) to save money for the good of the collective, it&#8217;s not really that much of a contradiction, is it?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Christien</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/02/19/pethokoukis-savior-based-economics/comment-page-1/#comment-1895810</link>
		<dc:creator>Christien</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Feb 2009 17:22:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=44503#comment-1895810</guid>
		<description>Obama needs to explain how he plans to bail out the bailout mentality he&#039;s enabling.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Obama needs to explain how he plans to bail out the bailout mentality he&#8217;s enabling.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rapunzel77</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/02/19/pethokoukis-savior-based-economics/comment-page-1/#comment-1895801</link>
		<dc:creator>rapunzel77</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Feb 2009 17:21:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=44503#comment-1895801</guid>
		<description>&quot;I could not have summed it up any better!!! Well Done.&quot;


Agreed!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;I could not have summed it up any better!!! Well Done.&#8221;</p>
<p>Agreed!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rapunzel77</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/02/19/pethokoukis-savior-based-economics/comment-page-1/#comment-1895795</link>
		<dc:creator>rapunzel77</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Feb 2009 17:20:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=44503#comment-1895795</guid>
		<description>I meannt that health care is not a right.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I meannt that health care is not a right.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mph</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/02/19/pethokoukis-savior-based-economics/comment-page-1/#comment-1895790</link>
		<dc:creator>mph</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Feb 2009 17:20:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=44503#comment-1895790</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;OT: OK man pulled over, investigated for anti-Obama bumper sticker.

Sticker seized. Secret Service goes to home.

Abort Obama, not the unborn

Dissent is no longer patriotic.

faraway on February 19, 2009 at 10:12 AM&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Not really off topic is it? First, they take the bumper stickers!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>OT: OK man pulled over, investigated for anti-Obama bumper sticker.</p>
<p>Sticker seized. Secret Service goes to home.</p>
<p>Abort Obama, not the unborn</p>
<p>Dissent is no longer patriotic.</p>
<p>faraway on February 19, 2009 at 10:12 AM</p></blockquote>
<p>Not really off topic is it? First, they take the bumper stickers!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rapunzel77</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/02/19/pethokoukis-savior-based-economics/comment-page-1/#comment-1895787</link>
		<dc:creator>rapunzel77</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Feb 2009 17:19:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=44503#comment-1895787</guid>
		<description>&quot;It kills me that the Dems seem to think the right to healthcare is in the Constitution…BUT the right to life is not.
Our rights are..the right to LIFE, liberty and the pursuit of happiness. That means to me that killing a child in the womb is taking the right of life away from that child.

becki51758 on February 19, 2009 at 10:40 AM&quot;


I totally agree.  Health care a right but it would be nice if it could be more affordable.  We need it because we do get sick, etc but it isn&#039;t something enshrined in our constitution.  The right to LIFE is and yet the democrats in particular has enshrined in their platform the supposed &quot;right&quot; to kill the pre-born.  What about their right to life???</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;It kills me that the Dems seem to think the right to healthcare is in the Constitution…BUT the right to life is not.<br />
Our rights are..the right to LIFE, liberty and the pursuit of happiness. That means to me that killing a child in the womb is taking the right of life away from that child.</p>
<p>becki51758 on February 19, 2009 at 10:40 AM&#8221;</p>
<p>I totally agree.  Health care a right but it would be nice if it could be more affordable.  We need it because we do get sick, etc but it isn&#8217;t something enshrined in our constitution.  The right to LIFE is and yet the democrats in particular has enshrined in their platform the supposed &#8220;right&#8221; to kill the pre-born.  What about their right to life???</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: labwriter</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/02/19/pethokoukis-savior-based-economics/comment-page-1/#comment-1895681</link>
		<dc:creator>labwriter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Feb 2009 16:57:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=44503#comment-1895681</guid>
		<description>I want to know when we&#039;re going to take to the streets. I&#039;m not a leader, but I&#039;m a damn good follower, and my pitchfork is hanging in the garage. Just let me know.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I want to know when we&#8217;re going to take to the streets. I&#8217;m not a leader, but I&#8217;m a damn good follower, and my pitchfork is hanging in the garage. Just let me know.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Count to 10</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/02/19/pethokoukis-savior-based-economics/comment-page-1/#comment-1895629</link>
		<dc:creator>Count to 10</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Feb 2009 16:45:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=44503#comment-1895629</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;“Foreclosures are actually resulting in overpriced homes burdened with too much debt being moved into the hands of new buyers, who are paying drastically reduced prices. They can therefore purchase using a traditional mortgage. … Delaying and dragging out the downturn by artificially propping up home prices will arguably work against the market healing.”&lt;/blockquote&gt;
And there you have it.
Anything else is just pandering.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>“Foreclosures are actually resulting in overpriced homes burdened with too much debt being moved into the hands of new buyers, who are paying drastically reduced prices. They can therefore purchase using a traditional mortgage. … Delaying and dragging out the downturn by artificially propping up home prices will arguably work against the market healing.”</p></blockquote>
<p>And there you have it.<br />
Anything else is just pandering.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Susanboo</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/02/19/pethokoukis-savior-based-economics/comment-page-1/#comment-1895590</link>
		<dc:creator>Susanboo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Feb 2009 16:39:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=44503#comment-1895590</guid>
		<description>&lt;&lt;blockquote&gt;blockquote&gt;Better still, we just built a 2,000 student high school without a pool. Who the hell builds a HS without a frackin’ pool?

Bishop&lt;/blockquote&gt;


Hey Bishop, just curious, where do you live?  Do they really typically put swimming pools in high schools where you live, or were you being sarcastic? Seriously, I live in a far West Texas border town, and no school except the University , has a pool. Too property poor, no money for luxuries like pools.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&lt;<br />
<blockquote>blockquote&gt;Better still, we just built a 2,000 student high school without a pool. Who the hell builds a HS without a frackin’ pool?</p>
<p>Bishop</p></blockquote>
<p>Hey Bishop, just curious, where do you live?  Do they really typically put swimming pools in high schools where you live, or were you being sarcastic? Seriously, I live in a far West Texas border town, and no school except the University , has a pool. Too property poor, no money for luxuries like pools.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Always To The Right</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/02/19/pethokoukis-savior-based-economics/comment-page-1/#comment-1895572</link>
		<dc:creator>Always To The Right</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Feb 2009 16:35:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=44503#comment-1895572</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;We Used To Call This Elitism...&lt;/strong&gt;

Pethokoukis: Savior-based economics
...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>We Used To Call This Elitism&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>Pethokoukis: Savior-based economics<br />
&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
