Michelle: The media’s guilty of a double standard on Obama’s Afghanistan surge
posted at 3:51 pm on February 19, 2009 by Allahpundit
Share on Facebook | printer-friendly
Eh, I don’t know. There is a double standard at work here, but it has less to do with who’s in office than with the fact that the left’s painted itself into a corner by using Afghanistan as a talking point against Iraq for the past six years. Afghanistan’s the “good war” to which we should be devoting our resources, the argument goes, not to the neocon rodeo in Mesopotamia. Disparities in public support for the two missions over the last four years have backed that position up. That being so, what can the media do now when The One says he’s ready to send 17,000 troops to Kabul except swallow hard?
Rest assured, he will eventually face pushback from the left for this — the first stirrings are already occurring — but they’re not going to ruin the honeymoon a month into his term. A more useful discussion for the Foxies than media bias would be why, oh why, with Hopenchange fever supposedly sweeping the globe, Europe refuses to kick in a few extra troops to win the war even liberals think (or so they say) needs to be won. Thanks to Legal Insurrection for that link.
You must be logged in to post a comment.

















Blowback
Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.
Trackbacks/Pings
Trackback URL
Comments
Comment pages: « Previous 1 2
Let’s hope Code Pink pickets the Whitehouse.
mistersurefire on February 20, 2009 at 10:43 AM
AP, do you seriously think the left would not have turned against US operations in Afghanistan, had we not tackled the second front in Iraq? They were already starting to before 2001 even drew to a close. Their “opposition” to our efforts in Iraq never had anything to do with Iraq per se; they simply seized on it as the opportunity they’d been searching for since 9/11 itself, as a wedge to try to turn the public against Bush.
Cylor on February 20, 2009 at 11:31 AM
Republicans = big national debt and spending
Republicans = un-just wars and agression
Republicans = racism
Hope and Change?
Now democrates = big national debt and spending
etc.
danabpetersen on February 20, 2009 at 12:54 PM
Comment pages: « Previous 1 2