Animal sex….

It is always encouraging when an someone take the time to incoherently write a statement calling you a moron.

LOve ya bro, but you lost cool point on the reply.

jcila on February 19, 2009 at 7:36 PM

All quite irrelevant. There are places in my own city into which I would not venture – day or night. Muslims are a lost cause, in that there is no chance of ever modifying their stance. Christians, on the other hand, say that they are prepared to be tolerant, while making statements of faith which are presented as fact, and insisting upon including all in that statement, without so much as a by your leave.

Christians question Darwin, for example, by nit-picking bits of the theory that do not, yet, have a solution, in order to dispute the theory. Whereas, these same people make statements regarding their faith as absolute truth – without a shred of evidence with which to back it up, and then calmly state that all people are governed by this mantra – no buts.

“There are more muslims in the U.K than christian” , where the f did u get u moron

Equanim1ty found on February 19, 2009 at 2:43 PM

Does this make sense to anyone?

It is always encouraging when an someone take the time to incoherently write a statement calling you a moron.

Apparently he doesn’t know how to google to see if I might have read something he hasn’t.

so stop blaming christians when its proven statistically that since 1990 almost 15000 terrorist attacks world wide were reported and out of those
99.3% were committed by followers of the religion of pieces
.03% were committed by hindus
.02% were comitted by christians
.01% were comitted by a jew
.01% were comitted by unknow

And thats your belief fine..
then try to go to the muslim controlled areas
in any western country and explain your views to them..

Please?
i have a funny feeling all of these so called brave atheists wouldnt dare ..

For they like their heads in their current location
Attached..

So your point is that in predominantly Christian lands, most wars involved Christians?

So what?

malclave on February 19, 2009 at 4:31 PM

The “so what” is that Christians seem to have this “special status” thing, merely because a book tells them so. I suppose that Scientologists are told much the same thing.

In truth, Christianity has no claim on being different to any other humans in their behaviour through the ages. They have no rational claim on morality, ethics, standards etc, beyond that which can be claimed by anyone who achieves an improvement over generations. As did the writers of the Bible.

Archie Noble on February 19, 2009 at 10:55 AM

Elitist! :)

So your point is that in predominantly Christian lands, most wars involved Christians?

malclave on February 19, 2009 at 4:31 PM

Excellent point.

To repeat, my original and subsequent posts were about wars in Europe and the North. Nothing to do with Asia, or non-Christians.

Also, I did make the point that not all wars were fought on behalf of Christianity – merely that they were fought by Christians. The reason for any war, aggressive in nature, is immaterial.

OldEnglish on February 19, 2009 at 8:55 AM

So your point is that in predominantly Christian lands, most wars involved Christians?

So what?

Presumption: one or more atheists have either committed a crime or been victimized by a crime.
Conclusion: All, every, 100% of crimes involving atheists have involved atheists.

Pascal’s Wager has been thoroughly discredited.

maleman on February 19, 2009 at 2:01 PM

The fact that philosophers and thinkers have debates about it means that it has been “totally discredited”?. Not even to wikipedia link that you provide asserts that. I am not sure you understand what the wager is about.

A Statement Worth Considering.. “Blessed Are Those Who Make Peace, For They Shall Be Called The Children Of GOD”

GD on February 19, 2009 at 1:08 PM

And the Hebrew word of “make” was an action word…you have to take action to make peace…that may mean destroying evil, which God never had a problem with.

Why do Christians care so much about other peoples beliefs?

iamblue

I suggest you just skip over these posts…you don’t really want an answer.

maleman on February 19, 2009 at 2:01 PM

Pascal’s wager is not an argument for or against. It is the logical conclusion of the reality of these two situations.

Atheist is correct, christians wrong, net effect of living life by biblical teachings—-ZERO.

Christian is correct, atheists wrong, net effect of living life for self and not christ—Eternal Damnation.

Now, that being said, the link you provided to wikipedia is somewhat intersting in the sense that it comes back to Richard Dawkins. The thing that I find the most intriguing about Dawkins is his maniacal hatred of the God of the old testament. Why does his hatred focus squarely on the God of Abraham, Issac and Jacob and not at the god of Islam? Given the fact that there are more muslims in the UK than there are Christians, it almost seems like Dawkins feels that he has an easier target in the Christians.

As a side note, they are also less likely to cut his head off, so there is that aspect too.

Marine_Bio on February 19, 2009 at 1:57 PM

9-11 was over reaching on and not on our part.

Superior firepower is only ever a bad thing if you’re receiving it.

If the atheist is right, and there is no God – no Heaven, no Hell. . . then when we he and I die, nothing happnes.
If the Christians are right, I would not want to be the atheist.

Pascal’s Wager has been thoroughly discredited.

hawkdriver on February 19, 2009 at 1:42 PM

Meh. True but that’s not what I meant. In the context of the first part of your quote, “And you shall hear of wars and rumours of wars. See that ye be not troubled. For these things must come to pass.”, is the equality I was refering to.

There is no evidence of the US being a world power in the end times, unless it is in the context of the lions of tarsish.

In a contemporary context though, there is little reason to believe that our superiority will continue. As I see it, with the over reaching that is currently going on, we as a nation are in a very precarious position.

Superior firepower matters little, if you’re self imploding as a nation.

:)

Marine_Bio on February 19, 2009 at 1:24 PM

There is no equality in superior firepower…

By design.

hawkdriver on February 19, 2009 at 1:20 PM

Under the circumstance of all things being equal, yes.

Unfortunately, all things are not equal.

“Peace can be attained and maintained through superior firepower.”

I Suppose Man Finds Many Records Of Thought In His Time, Which Ones He Adheres To Declare His Wisdom Or Folly.. By Grace Are You Saved…The Fall Of Self-Righteousness Is Grace

GD on February 19, 2009 at 12:40 PM

Any other rule that man tries impose on man is arbitrary. Where shall we derive our morality?