<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Heartache: Greenspan backs bank nationalization</title>
	<atom:link href="http://hotair.com/archives/2009/02/18/heartache-greenspan-backs-bank-nationalization/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/02/18/heartache-greenspan-backs-bank-nationalization/</link>
	<description>The world’s first, full-service conservative Internet broadcast network</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2012 02:39:11 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Federal Momma&#8217;s Apronstrings &#171; Justbkuz</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/02/18/heartache-greenspan-backs-bank-nationalization/comment-page-2/#comment-1895433</link>
		<dc:creator>Federal Momma&#8217;s Apronstrings &#171; Justbkuz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Feb 2009 16:05:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=44404#comment-1895433</guid>
		<description>[...] via Hot Air,  Greenspan backs bank [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] via Hot Air,  Greenspan backs bank [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Merovign</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/02/18/heartache-greenspan-backs-bank-nationalization/comment-page-2/#comment-1893981</link>
		<dc:creator>Merovign</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Feb 2009 03:05:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=44404#comment-1893981</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s not nearly as bad as the Great Depression, but boy are they trying!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s not nearly as bad as the Great Depression, but boy are they trying!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: angryed</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/02/18/heartache-greenspan-backs-bank-nationalization/comment-page-2/#comment-1893549</link>
		<dc:creator>angryed</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Feb 2009 01:34:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=44404#comment-1893549</guid>
		<description>nationalise some banks on a &lt;em&gt;&lt;strong&gt;temporary&lt;&lt;/strong&gt;/em&gt; basis

HA! Temporary my ass. Has anyone ever known anything temporary when it comes to the govt? Hell, it took 100 years to repeal the temporary tax on phones used to fund the Spanish-American war.&lt;/em&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>nationalise some banks on a <em><strong>temporary&lt;</strong>/em&gt; basis</p>
<p>HA! Temporary my ass. Has anyone ever known anything temporary when it comes to the govt? Hell, it took 100 years to repeal the temporary tax on phones used to fund the Spanish-American war.</em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Greenspan backs temporary nationalization of banks &#171; The Daley Gator</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/02/18/heartache-greenspan-backs-bank-nationalization/comment-page-2/#comment-1893337</link>
		<dc:creator>Greenspan backs temporary nationalization of banks &#171; The Daley Gator</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Feb 2009 00:49:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=44404#comment-1893337</guid>
		<description>[...] H/T Hot Air [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] H/T Hot Air [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Blacksmith8</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/02/18/heartache-greenspan-backs-bank-nationalization/comment-page-2/#comment-1893153</link>
		<dc:creator>Blacksmith8</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Feb 2009 00:12:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=44404#comment-1893153</guid>
		<description>I remember Greenspan. My 401k not so much.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I remember Greenspan. My 401k not so much.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kevin M</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/02/18/heartache-greenspan-backs-bank-nationalization/comment-page-2/#comment-1892689</link>
		<dc:creator>Kevin M</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Feb 2009 23:08:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=44404#comment-1892689</guid>
		<description>&quot;The US government may have to &lt;strong&gt;nationalise &lt;/strong&gt;some banks on a temporary basis... &quot;

This may be a scam, people.  Since when does Alan Greenspan speak in an English-spelled dialect?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;The US government may have to <strong>nationalise </strong>some banks on a temporary basis&#8230; &#8221;</p>
<p>This may be a scam, people.  Since when does Alan Greenspan speak in an English-spelled dialect?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: nukeemnow</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/02/18/heartache-greenspan-backs-bank-nationalization/comment-page-2/#comment-1892594</link>
		<dc:creator>nukeemnow</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Feb 2009 22:57:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=44404#comment-1892594</guid>
		<description>Lets not forget that this whole mess started with bendover Barney Frank,Chris Dodd and Bill Clinton buying black votes with free houses on taxpayer funded unsecured loans.May they all rot in hell! Come to think of it,they can take Greenspan and that lying ass OLD lady of his with them.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Lets not forget that this whole mess started with bendover Barney Frank,Chris Dodd and Bill Clinton buying black votes with free houses on taxpayer funded unsecured loans.May they all rot in hell! Come to think of it,they can take Greenspan and that lying ass OLD lady of his with them.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: EZ Credit Site » Heartache: Greenspan backs bank nationalization - Hotair.com</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/02/18/heartache-greenspan-backs-bank-nationalization/comment-page-2/#comment-1892263</link>
		<dc:creator>EZ Credit Site » Heartache: Greenspan backs bank nationalization - Hotair.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Feb 2009 22:06:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=44404#comment-1892263</guid>
		<description>[...] Post By Google News Click Here For The Entire Article    Share and Enjoy: These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Post By Google News Click Here For The Entire Article    Share and Enjoy: These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MB4</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/02/18/heartache-greenspan-backs-bank-nationalization/comment-page-2/#comment-1892210</link>
		<dc:creator>MB4</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Feb 2009 21:58:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=44404#comment-1892210</guid>
		<description>Owners of capital will stimulate the working class to buy more and more of expensive goods, houses and technology, pushing them to take more and more expensive credits, until their debt becomes unbearable. The unpaid debt will lead to bankruptcy of banks, which will have to be nationalized, and the State will have to take the road which will eventually lead to communism.
- Karl Marx (Das Kapital, 1867)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Owners of capital will stimulate the working class to buy more and more of expensive goods, houses and technology, pushing them to take more and more expensive credits, until their debt becomes unbearable. The unpaid debt will lead to bankruptcy of banks, which will have to be nationalized, and the State will have to take the road which will eventually lead to communism.<br />
- Karl Marx (Das Kapital, 1867)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Quetzal</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/02/18/heartache-greenspan-backs-bank-nationalization/comment-page-2/#comment-1892155</link>
		<dc:creator>Quetzal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Feb 2009 21:47:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=44404#comment-1892155</guid>
		<description>..so Greenspan advocates nationalizing banks  (temporarily??) - He has absolutely disqualified himself as a responsible advocate of laisser-faire capitalism, not to mention its &lt;strong&gt;&lt;em&gt;high priest&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;.  

Let&#039;s put this Randian flunkie to bed and go with Cato&#039;s formula: 

&lt;strong&gt;1) Sound money, Rule of Law, Property Rights
2) Don&#039;t make multiple mistakes
3) There is no single policy for prosperity
4) Small Gov is good for the Economy&lt;/strong&gt;

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jCaUA5l_bYc&amp;eurl=http://hotair.com/archives/2009/02/18/video-after-porkulus-now-what/&amp;feature=player_embedded.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>..so Greenspan advocates nationalizing banks  (temporarily??) &#8211; He has absolutely disqualified himself as a responsible advocate of laisser-faire capitalism, not to mention its <strong><em>high priest</em></strong>.  </p>
<p>Let&#8217;s put this Randian flunkie to bed and go with Cato&#8217;s formula: </p>
<p><strong>1) Sound money, Rule of Law, Property Rights<br />
2) Don&#8217;t make multiple mistakes<br />
3) There is no single policy for prosperity<br />
4) Small Gov is good for the Economy</strong></p>
<p><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jCaUA5l_bYc&#038;eurl=http://hotair.com/archives/2009/02/18/video-after-porkulus-now-what/&#038;feature=player_embedded" rel="nofollow">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jCaUA5l_bYc&#038;eurl=http://hotair.com/archives/2009/02/18/video-after-porkulus-now-what/&#038;feature=player_embedded</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Aronne</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/02/18/heartache-greenspan-backs-bank-nationalization/comment-page-2/#comment-1892021</link>
		<dc:creator>Aronne</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Feb 2009 21:18:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=44404#comment-1892021</guid>
		<description>Oh, joy.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh, joy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Always To The Right</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/02/18/heartache-greenspan-backs-bank-nationalization/comment-page-2/#comment-1891918</link>
		<dc:creator>Always To The Right</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Feb 2009 21:00:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=44404#comment-1891918</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Perfect...&lt;/strong&gt;

Heartache: Greenspan backs bank nationalization

Suddenly, Lindsey Graham&#8217;s a Greenspanian,
and the wrong man moved.  Alan Greenspan told Financial Times that the
US may have to nationalize banks as part of a once-per-century
necessity. ......</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Perfect&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>Heartache: Greenspan backs bank nationalization</p>
<p>Suddenly, Lindsey Graham&#8217;s a Greenspanian,<br />
and the wrong man moved.  Alan Greenspan told Financial Times that the<br />
US may have to nationalize banks as part of a once-per-century<br />
necessity. &#8230;&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Speakup</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/02/18/heartache-greenspan-backs-bank-nationalization/comment-page-2/#comment-1891847</link>
		<dc:creator>Speakup</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Feb 2009 20:40:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=44404#comment-1891847</guid>
		<description>You know, I think I can fix this mess, if the nation would just, make me the King.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You know, I think I can fix this mess, if the nation would just, make me the King.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rick007</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/02/18/heartache-greenspan-backs-bank-nationalization/comment-page-2/#comment-1891787</link>
		<dc:creator>Rick007</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Feb 2009 20:23:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=44404#comment-1891787</guid>
		<description>Sorry for the typos a broken finger. LOL</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sorry for the typos a broken finger. LOL</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rick007</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/02/18/heartache-greenspan-backs-bank-nationalization/comment-page-2/#comment-1891781</link>
		<dc:creator>Rick007</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Feb 2009 20:23:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=44404#comment-1891781</guid>
		<description>I finaly figured it out. If something happens to the &quot;O&quot; we get Biden. If something ha[[ens to Biden we ger Pelosi.

 Waht a great insurance program.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I finaly figured it out. If something happens to the &#8220;O&#8221; we get Biden. If something ha[[ens to Biden we ger Pelosi.</p>
<p> Waht a great insurance program.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Coronagold</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/02/18/heartache-greenspan-backs-bank-nationalization/comment-page-2/#comment-1891768</link>
		<dc:creator>Coronagold</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Feb 2009 20:20:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=44404#comment-1891768</guid>
		<description>When I look at Greenspan all I see is soylent green.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When I look at Greenspan all I see is soylent green.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: thmcbb</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/02/18/heartache-greenspan-backs-bank-nationalization/comment-page-2/#comment-1891751</link>
		<dc:creator>thmcbb</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Feb 2009 20:16:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=44404#comment-1891751</guid>
		<description>Why should this suprize anyone this man has always been a closet Lib.Just look who is his wife is.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why should this suprize anyone this man has always been a closet Lib.Just look who is his wife is.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: UNREPENTANT CONSERVATIVE CAPITOLIST</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/02/18/heartache-greenspan-backs-bank-nationalization/comment-page-2/#comment-1891737</link>
		<dc:creator>UNREPENTANT CONSERVATIVE CAPITOLIST</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Feb 2009 20:12:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=44404#comment-1891737</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;Hoovernomics &lt;/blockquote&gt;
sounds like it sucks</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Hoovernomics </p></blockquote>
<p>sounds like it sucks</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: voiceofreason</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/02/18/heartache-greenspan-backs-bank-nationalization/comment-page-2/#comment-1891724</link>
		<dc:creator>voiceofreason</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Feb 2009 20:09:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=44404#comment-1891724</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;WashJeff on February 18, 2009 at 1:54 PM&lt;/blockquote&gt;

I have no idea but probably someone I won&#039;t trust.  As for question 2, again I have no idea.  

Whomever it is, watch them very closely.  The potential for fraud and cronyism is just too great.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>WashJeff on February 18, 2009 at 1:54 PM</p></blockquote>
<p>I have no idea but probably someone I won&#8217;t trust.  As for question 2, again I have no idea.  </p>
<p>Whomever it is, watch them very closely.  The potential for fraud and cronyism is just too great.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: blackelkspeaks</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/02/18/heartache-greenspan-backs-bank-nationalization/comment-page-2/#comment-1891696</link>
		<dc:creator>blackelkspeaks</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Feb 2009 20:04:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=44404#comment-1891696</guid>
		<description>As a youth, during high school in the early 1970s, I was something of an Ayn Rand acolyte. I read anything and everything written by her (fiction, nonfiction) or those associated with her (Branden, Rothbard, Greenspan, Peikoff, et.al). Greenspan became famous as a contributor to &quot;Capitalism; The Unknown Ideal&quot;, which was a collection of economic essays, which included his piece on &quot;The Gold Standard&quot;.

Some years later, after the split that occurred between many members of her inner circle, I began to read the stories written by those who described each other&#039;s participation and contribution to the Ayn Rand phenomenon. I was surprised to discover that Rand never liked Greenspan and only deigned to include him in the book due to his friendship with Branden. Rand didn&#039;t like Greenspan&#039;s thinking and disagreed with him on many important issues. She later considered him a publicity-seeking hanger-on who rode her famous coattails to wealth and influence.

It was a revelation to me years afterward to acknowledge the true genius of Ayn Rand, who recognized early on the despicable character of Greenspan many years before he publicly revealed his true nature as just another statist bureaucrat.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As a youth, during high school in the early 1970s, I was something of an Ayn Rand acolyte. I read anything and everything written by her (fiction, nonfiction) or those associated with her (Branden, Rothbard, Greenspan, Peikoff, et.al). Greenspan became famous as a contributor to &#8220;Capitalism; The Unknown Ideal&#8221;, which was a collection of economic essays, which included his piece on &#8220;The Gold Standard&#8221;.</p>
<p>Some years later, after the split that occurred between many members of her inner circle, I began to read the stories written by those who described each other&#8217;s participation and contribution to the Ayn Rand phenomenon. I was surprised to discover that Rand never liked Greenspan and only deigned to include him in the book due to his friendship with Branden. Rand didn&#8217;t like Greenspan&#8217;s thinking and disagreed with him on many important issues. She later considered him a publicity-seeking hanger-on who rode her famous coattails to wealth and influence.</p>
<p>It was a revelation to me years afterward to acknowledge the true genius of Ayn Rand, who recognized early on the despicable character of Greenspan many years before he publicly revealed his true nature as just another statist bureaucrat.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ed Driscoll &#187; I Think That&#8217;s Why She Called It &#8220;Capitalism: The Unknown Ideal&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/02/18/heartache-greenspan-backs-bank-nationalization/comment-page-2/#comment-1891691</link>
		<dc:creator>Ed Driscoll &#187; I Think That&#8217;s Why She Called It &#8220;Capitalism: The Unknown Ideal&#8221;</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Feb 2009 20:02:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=44404#comment-1891691</guid>
		<description>[...] think we can safely say that whatever he learned as a young Objectivist, Alan Greenspan isn&#8217;t paying much attention to Ayn Rand&#8217;s philosophy these days. Maybe he&#8217;s worried about being demonized as a &#8220;Proud Father of Global [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] think we can safely say that whatever he learned as a young Objectivist, Alan Greenspan isn&#8217;t paying much attention to Ayn Rand&#8217;s philosophy these days. Maybe he&#8217;s worried about being demonized as a &#8220;Proud Father of Global [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JohnBissell</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/02/18/heartache-greenspan-backs-bank-nationalization/comment-page-2/#comment-1891605</link>
		<dc:creator>JohnBissell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Feb 2009 19:48:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=44404#comment-1891605</guid>
		<description>How did that pic above of Travis The Chimp get mixed up with this Greenspan thread?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How did that pic above of Travis The Chimp get mixed up with this Greenspan thread?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: flyfisher</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/02/18/heartache-greenspan-backs-bank-nationalization/comment-page-2/#comment-1891595</link>
		<dc:creator>flyfisher</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Feb 2009 19:47:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=44404#comment-1891595</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;starfleet_dude on February 18, 2009 at 2:32 PM&lt;/blockquote&gt;

I agree that it&#039;s not nearly as bad on the Great Depression on the ground in the general economy...today. But in the financial sector, it&#039;s much much worse. Our banking system is insolvent. If they fairly valued their assets our big banks would be already be shuttered. Just wait until the commercial real estate market explodes. Oh, and don&#039;t forget the derivatives market. Some estimates say there more than $700 trilion in derivatives, of which 10% are presumed worthless. 


Assuming a stimulus would even work, a premise I disagree with (the impact of debt service will only compound the problem), all it would do is preserve the existing order, an order which is simply unsustainable. If you understand the power of exponents it&#039;s easy to understand why I say it&#039;s unsustainable. We need a reset and fundamental changes. Anyway we cut it there will be pain.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>starfleet_dude on February 18, 2009 at 2:32 PM</p></blockquote>
<p>I agree that it&#8217;s not nearly as bad on the Great Depression on the ground in the general economy&#8230;today. But in the financial sector, it&#8217;s much much worse. Our banking system is insolvent. If they fairly valued their assets our big banks would be already be shuttered. Just wait until the commercial real estate market explodes. Oh, and don&#8217;t forget the derivatives market. Some estimates say there more than $700 trilion in derivatives, of which 10% are presumed worthless. </p>
<p>Assuming a stimulus would even work, a premise I disagree with (the impact of debt service will only compound the problem), all it would do is preserve the existing order, an order which is simply unsustainable. If you understand the power of exponents it&#8217;s easy to understand why I say it&#8217;s unsustainable. We need a reset and fundamental changes. Anyway we cut it there will be pain.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BPD</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/02/18/heartache-greenspan-backs-bank-nationalization/comment-page-2/#comment-1891588</link>
		<dc:creator>BPD</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Feb 2009 19:46:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=44404#comment-1891588</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;Five! Five Trillion! Five Trillion in Debt!!!!!!!!!!!!! and counting!

Atlanta Media Guy on February 18, 2009 at 2:30 PM&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Lol.... you know, someone should make a youtube video with a bunch of clips of Obama, saying &quot;Five! Five Trillion! Five Trillion in Debt!!!!!!!!!!!!!&quot; to the same tune in the actual subway commercial.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Five! Five Trillion! Five Trillion in Debt!!!!!!!!!!!!! and counting!</p>
<p>Atlanta Media Guy on February 18, 2009 at 2:30 PM</p></blockquote>
<p>Lol&#8230;. you know, someone should make a youtube video with a bunch of clips of Obama, saying &#8220;Five! Five Trillion! Five Trillion in Debt!!!!!!!!!!!!!&#8221; to the same tune in the actual subway commercial.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: orlandocajun</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/02/18/heartache-greenspan-backs-bank-nationalization/comment-page-2/#comment-1891538</link>
		<dc:creator>orlandocajun</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Feb 2009 19:37:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=44404#comment-1891538</guid>
		<description>Why doesn&#039;t that old coot just go away? He retired, but he keeps opening his mouth and delivering his two cents. He&#039;s part of the problem to begin with, and like Dodd and Frank, want to lecture the country on how to solve it.

As far as Graham, I still can&#039;t believe S.C. re-elected that RINO. Sooner or later, he&#039;ll go over to the dark side and make a deal to line his own pockets or head up a committee. He makes me sick.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why doesn&#8217;t that old coot just go away? He retired, but he keeps opening his mouth and delivering his two cents. He&#8217;s part of the problem to begin with, and like Dodd and Frank, want to lecture the country on how to solve it.</p>
<p>As far as Graham, I still can&#8217;t believe S.C. re-elected that RINO. Sooner or later, he&#8217;ll go over to the dark side and make a deal to line his own pockets or head up a committee. He makes me sick.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
