Did Burris get caught on Blago tapes?

posted at 10:35 am on February 16, 2009 by Ed Morrissey

Federal investigators now want to talk with Roland Burris, the man appointed to the Senate by disgraced and impeached Governor Rod Blagojevich in Illinois.  According to Burris’ lawyers, the wiretaps may have caught Burris chatting about the Senate opening with Blagojevich or his staff.  Burris now has to fend off calls for his resignation by the legislature that has already expelled Blagojevich:

Burris’ evolving explanation of what happened took another twist when he said federal investigators want to talk about his appointment to the Senate seat that Blagojevich was charged with trying to sell.

“What I understand is some of the agents have reached out to my lawyers,” Burris said, adding “they want to meet with me.”

Burris attorney Timothy Wright acknowledged Burris may be on a covert recording in the Blagojevich investigation but declined to explain the senator’s comment about meeting with federal agents, saying “the FBI has not come to us and they’re not asking us for anything.”

Burris, a former attorney general, alternately looked nervous and feisty at a hastily arranged news conference in Chicago just a day before he was to embark on a statewide listening tour to meet the constituents he has represented for about a month. At times, Burris and his lawyer gave contradictory answers or no answers when pressed on whether he told the whole truth about his role.

Whoops!  Blago insisted that Burris was clean, although Illinois had little choice but to certify him in any case.  Now Burris may have starred in one or more of the conversations the feds have on tape, which means that the little pas de deux Burris played with the legislature makes it more interesting.  If Burris lied under oath, then the taped conversations could prove it.

Republicans in Illinois have already called for Burris to resign his seat and allow new Governor Pat Quinn to name a cleaner Senator to replace him.  They’ve also demanded an investigation in Illinois into potential perjury charges:

Illinois Republicans called Sunday for a perjury investigation of Sen. Roland W. Burris (D), who declared that he did not try to mislead state lawmakers about his contacts with associates of former governor Rod Blagojevich.

“I can’t believe anything that’s coming from Mr. Burris at this point,” said state Rep. Jim Durkin (R). He described Burris’s version of his contacts with Blagojevich insiders as a “continuously changing story.”

“I think it would be in the best interest of the state if he resigned,” Durkin said the day after news broke that Burris had filed an affidavit contradicting two earlier statements he made under oath.

Perjury is notoriously difficult to prove in court, but not impossible.  The Illinois legislature can also hold Burris in contempt, which will weaken him politically but won’t disqualify him from the Senate.  A significant FBI probe might make his position untenable anyway, as Harry Reid and Dick Durbin’s initial reluctance to seat Burris has been justified.  Reid and Durbin pointedly avoided any statements of support yesterday, with their offices saying that they would be looking at Burris’ changing statements very carefully to determine whether to take any action.

Really, this fruit is so low-hanging for Reid that it practically puts a divot in the ground.  Reid could make himself look like a crusader by forcing Burris out, through a fast Ethics Committee probe, and put the stench of Blagojevich behind the Democrats for good.  Will he?  I doubt that Reid has the guts to face down the Congressional Black Caucus, which will almost certainly object to the removal of the only African-American in the Senate.

Blowback

Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.

Trackbacks/Pings

Trackback URL

Comments

Comment pages: 1 2

Wait. Are you telling me the guy appointed to a senate seat by a guy who just got booted out of office, might possibly be corrupt?

Unfathomable.

lorien1973 on February 16, 2009 at 10:37 AM

Exactamundo as ever, Lo.

Basically, I now have “Chicago is corrupt beyond belief and a big piece of that corruption occupies the WH” as my default setting, and thus dont even look at stories like this anymore.

The next time a political story out of Chitown interests me it will have to say “Republican shocks world, wins Illinois Senate seat…women, minorities, & bipedal Chupacabras hardest hit”

Mike D. on February 16, 2009 at 1:11 PM

I have emailed my new senator from IL twice now, I was bored. Have not heard back from him yet. But then again I don’t live in Chicago so my vote does not count so I don’t expect to.

MTZinIL on February 16, 2009 at 1:01 PM

You don’t have to live in Chicago to vote here.

Knucklehead on February 16, 2009 at 1:23 PM

You don’t have to live in Chicago to vote here.

Knucklehead on February 16, 2009 at 1:23 PM

You don’t have to live at all to vote there or in St. Louis.

OmahaConservative on February 16, 2009 at 1:33 PM

My lib’(white) cousin claimes it is racism that motivates those who want to take down Burris…

OmahaConservative on February 16, 2009 at 12:50 PM

OC, pass this on to your (retarded) liberal white cousin:

Burris is a flaming nitwit, a future psych ward case (just Google it, fool), and has been rejected by the liberal crook Democrats of the State of Illinois too many times to name.

He was appointed by a guy who will be in Federal prison shortly, and denied entry by your white liberal nitwit heroes Reid and Durbin until their lawyers could no longer stall his entry.

GFY, clown.

Jaibones on February 16, 2009 at 1:36 PM

Leave Burris alone. At least he’s not as corrupt and dishonest as the guy he replaced.

Jim Treacher on February 16, 2009 at 2:20 PM

Leave Burris alone. At least he’s not as corrupt and dishonest as the guy he replaced.

Jim Treacher on February 16, 2009 at 2:20 PM

lol, Burris had me sucked in as a political innocent. When he went to the Senate and was poor mouthing his situation, I actually felt bad for him.

hawkdriver on February 16, 2009 at 3:44 PM

PLEASE!!!! Why else would a US Senator admit he committed purgery?

DenneyCrane on February 16, 2009 at 8:21 PM

Three words we should remember…Chicago Machine Democrat.
’nuff said.

ChicagoBlues on February 16, 2009 at 8:40 PM

Comment pages: 1 2