The Obamessiah Effect
posted at 10:54 am on February 12, 2009 by Ed Morrissey
In perusing Rasmussen’s latest political polling, an interesting fact popped out on their war-on-terror survey. Amid quite a bit of good news, including more confidence among voters in the effort and a declining sense that the terrorists have the initiative, comes this comparison between Barack Obama and George Bush:
Over half (52%) of voters say the situation in Iraq will get better in the next six months. That is up from 46% last month and also a new high water mark of optimism.
Just 20% now say the situation in Iraq will get worse over the coming months.
What’s changed in the last month? We haven’t changed policies, or even troop levels. After signing the SOFA two months ago, the situation has been quite static.
Well, except for one thing:
Though he’s only been in the White House slightly more than two weeks, President Obama is already receiving higher marks on his handling of the Iraq situation than his predecessor. Forty-two percent (42%) of voters rate Obama’s performance on Iraq good or excellent, while 17% give him a poor rating. President Bush’s final ratings on the war showed that 34% said good or excellent, while 45% said he was doing a poor job.
That’s a 28-point delta on “poor” between Bush and Obama … and for what? How has Obama changed directions on Iraq in the three weeks since taking office? He hasn’t. In fact, he appears to be slowly and quietly reverting back to the Bush position of long-term presence in Iraq.
And yet, survey respondents clearly see a massive difference between Bush and Obama on Iraq, based on nothing but the change of residents at the White House. Call it the Obamessiah Effect; his very presence makes unpopular policies suddenly more attractive.
In this case, the proximate effect is welcome, as a withdrawal from Iraq would hurt long-term American interests, and apparently the Iraqis agree that it would hurt their interests as well. However, a cult of personality has never — never — benefited a democracy. This irrational reaction bodes ill for our country, if it continues.
Blowback
Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.
Trackbacks/Pings
Trackback URL
Comments
Comment pages: « Previous 1 2
They are asking questions that are somewhat absurd. Like about Obama’s track record on Iraq. He doesn’t have one.
ProfessorMiao on February 12, 2009 at 3:06 PM
I finally agree with the Left on something. A very large percentage of Americans are morons.
capitalist piglet on February 12, 2009 at 4:11 PM
There are just so many painfully ignorant Americans. The abysmal state of education in this country must be addressed if we are to move forward into the 21st century as a modern nation.
ronsfi on February 12, 2009 at 4:57 PM
Seems Americans are simply encouraged by the fact that they no longer have a blithering idiot president who finds a way to destroy everything he touches and is on the wrong side of nearly every issue. Obama has no track record on Iraq but he can’t help but do better, since the whole fiasco could not have been handled worse.
Constantine on February 12, 2009 at 5:00 PM
Oh, I would say those who are “encouraged by the fact that they no longer have a blithering idiot president” are, in fact, the blithering idiots. It is incorrect to say Obama has no track record on Iraq. I seem to recall the Community-Organizer-In-Chief saying the surge was sure to fail and would make the situation much, much worse, blah, blah, blah….. The surge worked. Bush was right. Deal with it.
Ramlady on February 12, 2009 at 11:33 PM
Comment pages: « Previous 1 2