Video: Schumer says no one cares about pork

posted at 2:13 pm on February 10, 2009 by Ed Morrissey

The worst part? He’s probably right:

And let me say this, to all of the chattering class, that so much focuses on those little, tiny — yes, porky — amendments: The American people really don’t care.

Let’s recall the “tiny” amendments added already to Porkulus, as provided by Tom Coburn — and this is by no means a complete list:

  • $2 billion earmark for FutureGen near zero emissions powerplant in Mattoon, IL
  • $39 billion slush fund for “state fiscal stabilization” bailout
  • $5.5 billion for making federal buildings “green” (including $448 million for DHS HQ)
  • $200 million for workplace safety in USDA facilities
  • $275 million for flood prevention
  • $65 million for watershed rehabilitation
  • $200 million for public computer centers at community colleges and libraries
  • $650 million for the DTV transition coupon program
  • $307 million for constructing NIST office buildings
  • $1 billion for administrative costs and construction of NOAA office buildings
  • $100 million for constructing U.S. Marshalls office buildings
  • $300 million for constructing FBI office buildings
  • $800 million for constructing Federal Prison System buildings and facilities
  • $10 million to fight Mexican gunrunners
  • $1.3 billion for NASA (including $450 million for “science” at NASA)
  • $100 million to clean up sites used in early U.S. atomic energy program
  • $10 million for urban canals
  • $2 billion for manufacturing advanced batteries for hybrid cars
  • $1.5 billion for carbon capture projects under sec. 703 of P.L. 110-140 (though section only authorizes $1 billion for five years)
  • $300 million for hybrid and electric cars for federal employees
  • $198 million to design and furnish the DHS headquarters
  • $255 million for “priority procurements” at Coast Guard (polar ice breaker)
  • $500 million for State and local fire stations
  • $180 million for construction of Bureau of Land Management facilities
  • $500 million for wildland fire management
  • $110 million for construction for the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service
  • $522 million for construction for the Bureau of Indian Affairs
  • $650 million for abandoned mine sites
  • $75 million for the Smithsonian Institution
  • $1.2 billion for summer jobs for youth
  • $412 million for CDC headquarters
  • $500 million earmark for NIH facilities in Bethesda, MD
  • $160 million for “volunteers” at the Corp. for National and Community Service
  • $750 earmark for the National Computer Center in MD
  • $224 million for International Boundary and Water Commission – U.S. and Mexico
  • $850 million for Amtrak
  • $100 million for lead paint hazard reduction

Reporting this kind of pork used to be called speaking Truth to Power.  Now it’s just called speaking Truth to Apathy, at least according to Uncle Chuck.

Breaking on Hot Air

Blowback

Trackbacks/Pings

Trackback URL

Comments

I thought Obama said that the bill had no pork.

amerpundit on February 10, 2009 at 2:14 PM

Power to Truth: Get lost.

Sadly appropriate.

crazy_legs on February 10, 2009 at 2:14 PM

Schumer says no one cares about pork

…because our children & grandchildren will pay for it.

jgapinoy on February 10, 2009 at 2:15 PM

Schumer, you’re going to be famous as a campaign ad in 2010.

Vashta.Nerada on February 10, 2009 at 2:16 PM

If people understood who will pay for it , and what it will cost , they would care.

So if MSM did explain it , it would change things.

the_nile on February 10, 2009 at 2:16 PM

So noone cares ???

I do…

But I’m a Conservative…

Mark Garnett on February 10, 2009 at 2:16 PM

focuses on those little, tiny — yes, porky — amendments

Tiny, little?
I don’t know, Senator.
A billion here, a billion there, & pretty soon you’re talking big money.

jgapinoy on February 10, 2009 at 2:17 PM

I thought Obama said that the bill had no pork.

He did, but his labradoodles in the press are too busy licking his toes to mind that he’s lying.

Topsecretk9 on February 10, 2009 at 2:17 PM

Could a great conservative please run against this fool?

jencab on February 10, 2009 at 2:18 PM

This SOB is up for reelection in 2010. Maybe some of his constituents who have lost their jobs might not appreciate their tax money going to $5 billion of construction for government buildings in Washington or $22 billion to Puerto Rico.

rockmom on February 10, 2009 at 2:18 PM

Schumer = Scourge

marklmail on February 10, 2009 at 2:18 PM

I thought Obama said that the bill had no pork.

amerpundit on February 10, 2009 at 2:14 PM

Is not pork, it’s swine.

neuquenguy on February 10, 2009 at 2:19 PM

Sounds like he’s poll tested it.

Topsecretk9 on February 10, 2009 at 2:19 PM

And let me say this, to all of the chattering working class, that so much focuses on those little, tiny — yes, porky — amendments: The American people congress and senate really don’t care.

There, fixed it.

TrickyDick on February 10, 2009 at 2:20 PM

Another fox gives advice to the hens…
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Vnp4kj5lLOU

hawksruleva on February 10, 2009 at 2:21 PM

I thought Obama said that the bill had no pork.

You should know that anything that begins with “Obama says” is an automatic lie or what the pols like to call Nuance.

portlandon on February 10, 2009 at 2:21 PM

Schumer, you’re going to be famous as a campaign ad in 2010.

Vashta.Nerada on February 10, 2009 at 2:16 PM

Great idea. The GOP should blast this across the country.

Surely there is enough money, power and common sense in Wall Street to back someone who will win against Schumer.

INC on February 10, 2009 at 2:22 PM

If people understood who will pay for it , and what it will cost , they would care.

So if MSM did explain it , it would change things.

the_nile on February 10, 2009 at 2:16 PM

If only we could set up a system where only those who don’t understand or don’t care would pay. But that would be regressive…

DarkCurrent on February 10, 2009 at 2:22 PM

$650 million for abandoned mine sites

Errr… are we going to throw money into the ground and hope that it grows into more money?

WTF? Abandoned mines are usually abandoned for a reason, last time I checked.

Damiano on February 10, 2009 at 2:22 PM

$750 earmark for the National Computer Center in MD

That’s cheap. Let’s keep that one.

Dr.Cwac.Cwac on February 10, 2009 at 2:23 PM

Ask yourself…who won the election?

He might have a point.

Either that, or foolish people shouldn’t complain when they bring snakes into their homes and get bit.

Asher on February 10, 2009 at 2:23 PM

“Abadah,abadah,abadah. That’s All folks.”- Chuck “Porky Pig” Schumer.

portlandon on February 10, 2009 at 2:24 PM

If they don’t care about it, Charles, then why do you and your pals fight so hard for it? What? Cat got your tongue?

You’re a pitiful liar.

Christien on February 10, 2009 at 2:25 PM

$750 earmark for the National Computer Center in MD

Great, they will upgrade from windows 3.1 to windows 98. It would be 1 billion if they wanted to go to XP.

portlandon on February 10, 2009 at 2:25 PM

Wow, what an arrogant POS.

Politicians are acting more and more like aristocrats every day.

Our government really is a shell of it’s former self. It looks more like Versailles than Capitol Hill.

reaganaut on February 10, 2009 at 2:25 PM

Like I said before, republican arguments here stem from a questioning of the premise behind this bill…that government can spend money counter-cyclically in an effort to keep unemployment rates from losing any more ground. Of course that whole list will look like pork if you’ve never come across a worthwhile government program…aside from anything the pentagon spends money on of course ;-)

Sure some of that money will get wasted. There is NO way to avoid that, at all, aside from not providing for any projects whatsoever…which no one suggests but the most hardline among you. However, spending a billion here for youth temp jobs or a couple hundred million there for an emissions free power plant…most americans wouldn’t object to that.

ernesto on February 10, 2009 at 2:26 PM

$650 million for abandoned mine sites

Errr… are we going to throw money into the ground and hope that it grows into more money?

Damiano on February 10, 2009 at 2:22 PM

No, its just that they cannot spend so much money so fast, so they plan to throw bundles of it down mineshafts just to say they did something.

Vashta.Nerada on February 10, 2009 at 2:27 PM

Wow…. Hubris…

Romeo13 on February 10, 2009 at 2:27 PM

Actually, what Schmucky Schumer (D-bag) means to say is “The not yet born Americans don’t care.”

Dr.Cwac.Cwac on February 10, 2009 at 2:27 PM

$10 million to fight Mexican gunrunners
$198 million to design and furnish the DHS headquarters

Que? Me thinks the priorities are a little backwards.

portlandon on February 10, 2009 at 2:27 PM

Our Republic is dead.

BierManVA on February 10, 2009 at 2:28 PM

Politicians are acting more and more like aristocrats every day.

Yeah, and he also said to Republicans “You Lost” which I could be wrong, but I have a hunch that while that’s true most taxpaying voters desire a bit more class and grace in elected officials .

Also, that “you lost” solidifies that this gynormous crap sandwich rest firmly on his and his fellow democrats shoulders.

This is a campaign ad to be sure.

Topsecretk9 on February 10, 2009 at 2:28 PM

Well, the smart money does care. The DJIA -367 and still heading south.

Cody1991 on February 10, 2009 at 2:29 PM

No pork, pork. One of them is lying.

Like the song says, “two men say they’re Jesus, one of them must be wrong.”

Bishop on February 10, 2009 at 2:29 PM

republican arguments here stem from a questioning of the premise behind this bill…that government can spend money counter-cyclically in an effort to keep unemployment rates from losing any more ground.

ernesto on February 10, 2009 at 2:26 PM

That’s because Keynesian economics has been proven a failure time and again. Nobody is questioning it, we already know its wrong.

Vashta.Nerada on February 10, 2009 at 2:30 PM

most americans wouldn’t object to that.

ernesto on February 10, 2009 at 2:26 PM

The DOW is down over 300 pts. There seems to be some objection.

PappaMac on February 10, 2009 at 2:31 PM

most americans wouldn’t object to that.

ernesto on February 10, 2009 at 2:26 PM

Thus another example of how pure democracy fails every time…

DarkCurrent on February 10, 2009 at 2:32 PM

I thought Obama said that the bill had no pork.

amerpundit on February 10, 2009 at 2:14 PM

Dear Leader and Pelosi both said it “would contain no pork”. But what is forgotten, is they are Democrats! So it don’t matter what they say, they know Americans are ignorant and they don’t care.

Helps to have the MSM lying for your side too.

kirkill on February 10, 2009 at 2:32 PM

How much for the border fence and other border security measures?

toliver on February 10, 2009 at 2:34 PM

They don’t care, Chucky. In that you are right. They will care, Chucky. In that I am right. Your pork will turn into saltines on their plate. That’s when they’ll care and you’ll be one of the first to hear about it.

Limerick on February 10, 2009 at 2:34 PM

OK looking at that list, I see increased federal jobs, and jobs for contractors to work (temporarily) on federal projects (at prevailing wages, no less).

This bill does virtually nothing to stimulate the private sector. It does allow more of our elected officials to add some more family members to the rolls of hack jobs. Those federal jobs won’t go away, taxpayers will be paying for those jobs and their pensions forever.

reaganaut on February 10, 2009 at 2:35 PM

The DOW is down over 300 pts. There seems to be some objection.
PappaMac on February 10, 2009 at 2:31 PM

Soon your 401k will be a 4K, the rest having been taken by an imploded market.

What the hell is the market supposed to see as the driving force in this stimulus disaster? Medical, aerospace, housing, heavy industry? There is NOTHING on which to hang your investment hat; STD prevention and “promoting greeniness” aren’t on the stock list.

We’re flocked.

Bishop on February 10, 2009 at 2:35 PM

Hello DOW 6,000, Hello $5 Gas, etc…

PappaMac on February 10, 2009 at 2:35 PM

62% want MORE tax cuts and LESS spending.

Charles is wrong.

artist on February 10, 2009 at 2:36 PM

Sure some of that money will get wasted. There is NO way to avoid that, at all, aside from not providing for any projects whatsoever…which no one suggests but the most hardline among you. However, spending a billion here for youth temp jobs or a couple hundred million there for an emissions free power plant…most americans wouldn’t object to that.

ernesto on February 10, 2009 at 2:26 PM

There’s no way to prevent waste? Even going item by item openly down the list and seeing the estimates for job creation? We can spend nearly a trillion dollars but nobody can afford to sit down and review the list factually?

As for objections, seen the market lately? It’s down nearly 400 as I write this.

amerpundit on February 10, 2009 at 2:37 PM

It’s not pork because in Liberal World everything they spend money on is necessary and vital, therefore it’s not pork.

Bishop on February 10, 2009 at 2:37 PM

Unfortunately too many people don’t care about a little pork as long as they get some. Bringing home the pork is what keeps getting Schumer elected.

katiejane on February 10, 2009 at 2:37 PM

No, its just that they cannot spend so much money so fast, so they plan to throw bundles of it down mineshafts just to say they did something.

Vashta.Nerada on February 10, 2009 at 2:27 PM

LOL

Think_b4_speaking on February 10, 2009 at 2:37 PM

The Democraps just can’t resist tossing lit matches in a dry corn field. They’ll keep tossing and then act totally surprised when their hair plugs are krinkled up on the top of their little heads.

Limerick on February 10, 2009 at 2:39 PM

Anybody up for some hogzilla photoshop?

forest on February 10, 2009 at 2:39 PM

I thought Obama said that the bill had no pork.

amerpundit on February 10, 2009 at 2:14 PM

yep, and “Tax Cuts” now is the same thing as Welfare checks. Thanks to the dishonesty of BHO

jp on February 10, 2009 at 2:39 PM

“The chattering classes.” In quote signs.

He doesn’t realize that is all of us.

Alana on February 10, 2009 at 2:40 PM

Same Schumer….different flies….

b4lucy on February 10, 2009 at 2:40 PM

Spread the word

http://cato.org/special/stimulus09/cato_stimulus.pdf

izoneguy on February 10, 2009 at 2:40 PM

He’s such an idiot.

BoSox_or_Bust on February 10, 2009 at 2:41 PM

Hello DOW 6,000, Hello $5 Gas, etc…
PappaMac on February 10, 2009 at 2:35 PM

Yay, my IRA’s are on life support anyway, might as well cut it down by 3/4 so it’s easier to kill completely.

Bishop on February 10, 2009 at 2:41 PM

Unfortunately too many people don’t care about a little pork as long as they get some. Bringing home the pork is what keeps getting Schumer elected.

katiejane on February 10, 2009 at 2:37 PM

Voters care about: O.D.P. “Other Districts Pork”

the fact they don’t care about their own so much, is why we have so much of it. All Politics is local

jp on February 10, 2009 at 2:41 PM

There’s a reason he’s called Chuck the Schmuck.

Andy in Agoura Hills on February 10, 2009 at 2:42 PM

Schumer … communist

darwin on February 10, 2009 at 2:42 PM

How is it, without consequence, that Schumer can arrogantly sneer at a uniformly lauded virtue encapsulated in the familiar saying, “waste not, want not.”

I hope this clip becomes this POS’s “let them eat cake” moment. What a wasteful prick.

BuckeyeSam on February 10, 2009 at 2:44 PM

Could a great conservative please run against this fool?

jencab on February 10, 2009 at 2:18 PM

This SOB is up for reelection in 2010. Maybe some of his constituents who have lost their jobs might not appreciate their tax money going to $5 billion of construction for government buildings in Washington or $22 billion to Puerto Rico.

rockmom on February 10, 2009 at 2:18 PM

Rudy G would be fantastic. But lots of folks here won’t support him because they’d rather scream RINO and lose the election…and watch pricks like Schumer (and, yes, Obama) take over.

funky chicken on February 10, 2009 at 2:45 PM

Permission to treat the Federal Government as a hostile witness…

Skywise on February 10, 2009 at 2:45 PM

However, spending a billion here for youth temp jobs or a couple hundred million there for an emissions free power plant…most americans wouldn’t object to that.

So how much waste in those programs?

The problem here isn’t a billion dollar spending bill for youth jobs programs, it’s that there are 400 of these billion dollar programs which ALL suddenly became vitally necessary.

Gawdamm this angers me more by the minute, this lacksadaisical attitude that the left has for blowing a trillion dollars on something which is basically a guess.

Bishop on February 10, 2009 at 2:45 PM

Hey Chucky!

Fiddle lessons are the next rage. You ought to get you some, quick like.

Limerick on February 10, 2009 at 2:45 PM

All of this is making me sick…

This is all just a huge cluster-f…

I think I’ll go back to reality and play World of Warcraft.

Mark Garnett on February 10, 2009 at 2:46 PM

I think I’ll go back to reality and play World of Warcraft.

Mark Garnett on February 10, 2009 at 2:46 PM

If the Dems have their way only Pong will be available.

Limerick on February 10, 2009 at 2:47 PM

Just wait until you see Barry’s bailout bill for the other WTO countries. Their taxpayers certainly can’t afford to pay for it.

Vashta.Nerada on February 10, 2009 at 2:49 PM

If the Dems have their way only Pong will be available.

Limerick on February 10, 2009 at 2:47 PM

“I don’t want anyone not to have thousands of colors in their games… I just want to spread those colors around” – Obama.

Skywise on February 10, 2009 at 2:50 PM

Hey Schu! Go crash a bank or something. Nobody cares.

whitetop on February 10, 2009 at 2:50 PM

Well he’s right. If we cared enough – or if enough of us cared – we’d vote the bastards out and get rid of the pork alltogether.

t.ferg on February 10, 2009 at 2:51 PM

I think I’ll go back to reality and play World of Warcraft.
Mark Garnett on February 10, 2009 at 2:46 PM

Typical NeoCon warmonger.

Bishop on February 10, 2009 at 2:53 PM

This video is timely – I just took a Schumer after lunch.

hamnj7 on February 10, 2009 at 2:54 PM

um should schumer really be pushing pork?

Dr Evil on February 10, 2009 at 2:55 PM

I disagree
over half of the american people are so pissed off at there jerkoffs
they are already sharpening their pitchforks.
and the next thing will be to light the torches

Our children will NOT be ENSLAVED BY
either obama, pelozi or shummer or reid..

Period
We would rather DIE..

jcila on February 10, 2009 at 2:55 PM

$650 million for abandoned mine sites

If the site is abandoned, why is it being funded then?

$300 million for hybrid and electric cars for federal employees

Everything in Washington is either within walking distance or via public transporation, so why do these clowns even need cars?

$1.2 billion for summer jobs for youth

Provided the “youth” happens to be the son/daughter/nephew/niece of Senator/Congressman/Committeman/Lobbyist/Your-Important-Sounding-Bureaucratic-Position Here/etc.

$160 million for “volunteers” at the Corp. for National and Community Service

If it’s “volunteer”, whats it need funding for?

And on and on and on….

Oh wait, just noticed. We aren’t funding cow flatuence studies anymore? What gives?!!!

pilamaye on February 10, 2009 at 2:56 PM

I think I’ll go back to reality and play World of Warcraft.
Mark Garnett on February 10, 2009 at 2:46 PM

Typical NeoCon warmonger.

Bishop on February 10, 2009 at 2:53 PM

ROFL !!!!

Bishop RULES!

Mark Garnett on February 10, 2009 at 2:58 PM

Oh wait, just noticed. We aren’t funding cow flatuence studies anymore? What gives?!!!
pilamaye on February 10, 2009 at 2:56 PM

Sure we are, they’re called “Congressional Salaries”.

Bishop on February 10, 2009 at 2:58 PM

Bishop on February 10, 2009 at 2:58 PM

Sir, you are killing me… LMAO!

Mark Garnett on February 10, 2009 at 2:59 PM

Out of touch Senator.

becki51758 on February 10, 2009 at 3:00 PM

Could a great conservative please run against this fool?

jencab on February 10, 2009 at 2:18 PM

Great conservatives are few and far between here in NY.

pmanley on February 10, 2009 at 3:02 PM

I disagree
over half of the american people are so pissed off at there jerkoffs
they are already sharpening their pitchforks.
and the next thing will be to light the torches

Our children will NOT be ENSLAVED BY
either obama, pelozi or shummer or reid..

Period
We would rather DIE..

jcila on February 10, 2009 at 2:55 PM

I wish this were true.

t.ferg on February 10, 2009 at 3:03 PM

No Chuck, it is you who does not care!

I hate them all. I screamed at Claire McCaskill’s aide this morning on the phone. I think I’ll call again just to make myself feel better.

We’re all gonna die…

JAM on February 10, 2009 at 3:06 PM

Schiff this thing is just getting started..Hyper Inflation anyone bueller bueller

Dr Evil on February 10, 2009 at 3:09 PM

The problem, he says, is the government is trying to perpetuate a “phony economy” based on borrowing and spending. With the U.S. consumer tapped out, the government is “now taking on the mantle” of consumer of last resort, he continues, predicting the bond bubble will soon burst – if it hasn’t already – ultimately leading to a collapse of the dollar and an “inflationary depression worse than anything any of us have ever seen.

Dr Evil on February 10, 2009 at 3:11 PM

Schumer used to be my senator when I lived in NY. What’s especially galling is that big spending liberals like Schumer, Durban, Pelosi, Reid, Obama, Kennedy, Kerry … well, you get the picture … these politicians say everyday Americans don’t care about earmark. What this shithead means is that democrat party leaders aren’t concerned about the level of earmark spending.

Congrats, America. You deserve the representation that you voted for.

jdflorida on February 10, 2009 at 3:12 PM

So noone cares ???

I do…

But I’m a Conservative…

Mark Garnett on February 10, 2009 at 2:16 PM

I do too.

But I’m under 25… and will probably be paying for this wit h my retirement fund.

Chaz706 on February 10, 2009 at 3:14 PM

“Nobody cares about pork”

Looking at the almost 400 point drop in the stock market today tells me “somebody cares”.

I am betting Americans will care in the very near future when the deficit that democrats used to care so much about is quadrupled and inflation is sweeping the nation.

Then we will cue this video right up genius.

Baxter Greene on February 10, 2009 at 3:16 PM

Kinky Freidman is right there is a wave of populism taking hold in this country. I can’t think of a better group of Politicians who deserve the backlash…they think they are untouchable? No one is beyond the reach of KARMA. What goes around comes around.

Dr Evil on February 10, 2009 at 3:17 PM

If the “chattering classes” don’t care about these little porky things its because they don’t know about them. The Kleptocracy has done their best to kept us serfs in the dark about their dastardly plans. Remember, Obama wanted this on his desk on Inauguration day, and debate among our representatives is so last century.

This is the new way forward:

Hiding health legislation in a stimulus bill is intentional. Daschle supported the Clinton administration’s health-care overhaul in 1994, and attributed its failure to debate and delay. A year ago, Daschle wrote that the next president should act quickly before critics mount an opposition. “If that means attaching a health-care plan to the federal budget, so be it,” he said. “The issue is too important to be stalled by Senate protocol.”

Buy Danish on February 10, 2009 at 3:20 PM

Yo Chucky.

Lots of people care and lots of people dropped you a note, you’re not listening, dick.

Two years ago the switchboards crashed when people raged against amnesty the Dems didn’t listen, the Right did and voted it down.
Switchboards raged at 100 to 1 against this harmful spending bill and the Right listened (mostly) and the liberals did not.

Voters need to get a clue which party cares about what We the People have to say and which, could give a crap less.

Speakup on February 10, 2009 at 3:21 PM

Like I said before, republican arguments here stem from a questioning of the premise behind this bill…that government can spend money counter-cyclically in an effort to keep unemployment rates from losing any more ground. …

ernesto on February 10, 2009 at 2:26 PM

There’s been a run on straw men lately. That’s not the basis of “republican arguments here,” ernesto. You’ve got some really sloppy reasoning going on.

The policy mix question is non-trivial. It’s not true that there are no Paretians in a foxhole. We’re entitled to ask, and keep on asking, whether the types of either spending or tax cuts in this huge bill are as stimulative as required.

Economists continue to discuss these things (try and stop us!) because — surprise — there are some unsettled questions left. I personally think it’s an open question what the net effect of the stimulus will be as it’s currently constructed, but I’m not saying not to do anything.

How would an economist go about this process? (1) figure out a rough size required for the stimulus; (2) develop an ordering of stimulative effects by broad categories of tax cuts or expenditures, backed up by the best literature available; (3) go down the list from most to least stimulative, including each in the bill until one reaches the spending limit determined in (1). Have you observed anything like that going on with this bill?

And McCaskill, I’ll say this for her — she wanted money put aside to expand the Feds’ contracting corps with new hires and training, in the hope that less money would be wasted that way.

DrSteve on February 10, 2009 at 3:23 PM

Watsa matta you Chuckie? I don’t care to see pork IN the bill. Chuck always gets it wrong?

kanda on February 10, 2009 at 3:23 PM

The unvarnished arrogance of these people is astounding.

I vote for revolution.

NoLeftTurn on February 10, 2009 at 3:24 PM

If, as Chuck says, people don’t care, can I have some stimulus? Please……

IlikedAUH2O on February 10, 2009 at 3:31 PM

The One should give everyone on earth $1,000,000 in US currency. That would really fight this scary recession and make us liked again. He may do this….

IlikedAUH2O on February 10, 2009 at 3:34 PM