Stimulus spends money too fast for accountability
posted at 3:50 pm on February 9, 2009 by Ed Morrissey
According to a front-page report by the Washington Post, we can expect billions in waste with the current stimulus plan, thanks to a lack of control over the spending mechanisms in DC. The already-overburdened acquisition system won’t keep pace with the demands of the bill, resulting in lost resources on a scale that could fund entire departments for a year:
The Obama administration’s economic stimulus plan could end up wasting billions of dollars by attempting to spend money faster than an overburdened government acquisition system can manage and oversee it, according to documents and interviews with contracting specialists.
The $827 billion stimulus legislation under debate in Congress includes provisions aimed at ensuring oversight of the massive infusion of contracts, state grants and other measures. At the urging of the administration, those provisions call for transparency, bid competition, and new auditing resources and oversight boards.
But under the terms of the stimulus proposals, a depleted contracting workforce would be asked to spend more money more rapidly than ever before, while also improving competition and oversight. Auditors would be asked to track surges in spending on projects ranging from bridge construction and schools to research of “green” energy and the development of electronic health records — a challenge made more difficult because many contracts would be awarded by state agencies.
The stimulus plan presents a stark choice: The government can spend unprecedented amounts of money quickly in an effort to jump-start the economy or it can move more deliberately to thwart the cost overruns common to federal contracts in recent years.
So it’s not enough that the bill itself would contain massive waste and pork. We also will spend the money badly, apparently like we did with TARP, and likely to the same effect. It would make sense to pull this bill back to break it up into more efficient pieces, and focus on real emergency spending and tax cuts in the near term. Perhaps that way we can ensure that we don’t waste tens of billions of dollars by hysterically throwing money without the resources to manage it properly.
It’s not the only waste in the new, “compromise” bill, as Tom Coburn’s office points out:
$2 billion earmark for FutureGen near zero emissions powerplant in Mattoon, IL
- $39 billion slush fund for “state fiscal stabilization” bailout
- $5.5 billion for making federal buildings “green” (including $448 million for DHS HQ)
- $200 million for workplace safety in USDA facilities
- $275 million for flood prevention
- $65 million for watershed rehabilitation
- $200 million for public computer centers at community colleges and libraries
- $650 million for the DTV transition coupon program
- $307 million for constructing NIST office buildings
- $1 billion for administrative costs and construction of NOAA office buildings
- $100 million for constructing U.S. Marshalls office buildings
- $300 million for constructing FBI office buildings
- $800 million for constructing Federal Prison System buildings and facilities
- $10 million to fight Mexican gunrunners
- $1.3 billion for NASA (including $450 million for “science” at NASA)
- $100 million to clean up sites used in early U.S. atomic energy program
- $10 million for urban canals
- $2 billion for manufacturing advanced batteries for hybrid cars
- $1.5 billion for carbon capture projects under sec. 703 of P.L. 110-140 (though section only authorizes $1 billion for five years)
- $300 million for hybrid and electric cars for federal employees
- $198 million to design and furnish the DHS headquarters
- $255 million for “priority procurements” at Coast Guard (polar ice breaker)
- $500 million for State and local fire stations
- $180 million for construction of Bureau of Land Management facilities
- $500 million for wildland fire management
- $110 million for construction for the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service
- $522 million for construction for the Bureau of Indian Affairs
- $650 million for abandoned mine sites
- $75 million for the Smithsonian Institution
- $1.2 billion for summer jobs for youth
- $412 million for CDC headquarters
- $500 million earmark for NIH facilities in Bethesda, MD
- $160 million for “volunteers” at the Corp. for National and Community Service
- $750 earmark for the National Computer Center in MD
- $224 million for International Boundary and Water Commission – U.S. and Mexico
- $850 million for Amtrak
- $100 million for lead paint hazard reduction
Some of these projects might well be worthy — but they’re hardly emergencies, nor will they result in immediate job creation.










Blowback
Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.
Trackbacks/Pings
Trackback URL
Comments
Comment pages: 1 2 Next »
Speechless
artist on February 9, 2009 at 3:54 PM
We’ve got to have someplace to dump all that money.
Laura in Maryland on February 9, 2009 at 3:54 PM
Oops, I forgot the obvious:
SHAFT!
Laura in Maryland on February 9, 2009 at 3:55 PM
Beyond waste there will be fraud on an unbelievable scale.
There is even a 200 million dollar price tag just for ‘oversight’. Imagine that! Spending 200 million dollars just to account for the money disbursed.
The crooks are going to loot this money bill so badly it will be historic levels of fraud.
Skandia Recluse on February 9, 2009 at 3:55 PM
$650 million for the DTV transition coupon program
$10 million to fight Mexican gunrunners
Priorities of gov’t!
artist on February 9, 2009 at 3:55 PM
I hope DeMint & friends stop it, stall it, any procedural way they can.
Wethal on February 9, 2009 at 3:57 PM
Anyone stocking up on Food, Ammo and Guns yet?
You think THAT is bad… check out HR 45. It doesn’t have co-sponsers YET, but expect it soon!
upinak on February 9, 2009 at 3:57 PM
Hope-N-change is now fear and loathing ….
tarpon on February 9, 2009 at 3:57 PM
payoff for all the Global Warming lies that hacks with NASA have put forth
jp on February 9, 2009 at 3:57 PM
- Milton Friedman
PackerBronco on February 9, 2009 at 3:58 PM
I don’t get the TV conversion. I heard a caller last week put it in context. Where was his free coupon when 8-tracks changed over to CD’s. Why is it the government responsibility to get people up to date with technology? Besides, I also heard that they ran out of coupons because scalpers scooped them up and are selling the converters on ebay.
ctmom on February 9, 2009 at 3:58 PM
Aren’t these the same people who were crying about all the unaccounted for billions in Iraq…?
Oh what a difference a (D) makes.
NeoKong on February 9, 2009 at 3:58 PM
Isn’t Obama’s Chief Performance Officer all over this? Can’t TurboTax Timmy lend a hand? No? Guess we’ll just have to trust Barry and the Dems on this one, and the next one, and the next one…
Christien on February 9, 2009 at 3:58 PM
they could buy over a Million Flat Panel TV’s with that.
jp on February 9, 2009 at 3:59 PM
“Send guns, gold, and lawyers! The poo has hit the fan.”
Weight of Glory on February 9, 2009 at 4:00 PM
We would literally be better off burning the money the gov’t is printing.
JiangxiDad on February 9, 2009 at 4:00 PM
There need to be mass arrests in Washington. This idiocy must be stopped before we are plunged into an irreversible fiscal night mare.
MrScribbler on February 9, 2009 at 4:00 PM
That I can see, with all the dems being caught evading taxes.
This one I am not sure, is it a misprint should it read “running from guns”?
Either way, not one bit about securing borders…
Now that wouldn’t be Clintons friends from Arkansas, the chicken family?
There is so much pork, they need $200 mill to regulate the pork.
right2bright on February 9, 2009 at 4:00 PM
My calculator says that all adds up to 62.803 Billion.
That’s less than one tenth of the total bill. 7.6% to be more precise.
We are sooooo screwed.
trubble on February 9, 2009 at 4:00 PM
According to Al Gore, just wait another month or two and all the ice at the poles will be melted…. what do they need to spend 255 million on a polar ice breaker for?
Maybe they don’t think the ice is melting?
Maxx on February 9, 2009 at 4:01 PM
Jack Bauer will be riding around in a Prius now, or the ugly Ford or GM version anyway.
they’ll be auctioning off all their current cars cheap somewhere.
jp on February 9, 2009 at 4:01 PM
Ed: I think your headline needs a “Duh….” in front of it.
Vashta.Nerada on February 9, 2009 at 4:01 PM
I would bet that, somewhere in this bill, there are reimbursement provisions for congresspeople for Botox, face lifts, boob jobs and hair replacement.
BigD on February 9, 2009 at 4:01 PM
One thing nobody has talked about is the overhead & administrative expenses being set aside in this bill. If I remember right, in the hosue bill, half of 1% was set aside for administrative/oversight expense to the agencies that are receiving the money. That’s a LOT of money – $4 billion dollars.
In each section, ADDITIONAL money is set aside for administrative expenses. I wouldn’t be surprised if a full 10% of that money never left Washington DC (or at least disappears before getting out to the public).
hawksruleva on February 9, 2009 at 4:01 PM
Bwhahahahahah!! You’re pulling my leg, right Ed?
Not one of the projects listed gets to the root of the problem. It’s just one big crapola sammich stuffed down our throats.
Those idiots could save us a lot of time and money if they’d just suspend mark-to-market on mortgage instruments.
BacaDog on February 9, 2009 at 4:02 PM
..and not a single freakin’ place to plug one in.
BacaDog on February 9, 2009 at 4:03 PM
Is there a bill yet to purchase pretty Purple Unicorns yet?
jp on February 9, 2009 at 4:03 PM
what ?
runner on February 9, 2009 at 4:05 PM
perhaps Conservatives should organize a Keynes book burning party like the Obama stimulus parties.
jp on February 9, 2009 at 4:05 PM
Jeez, and the Left was all upset over waste and fraud and no bid contracts re: Iraq. But a prokulous bill that dwarfs that? No problem.
rbj on February 9, 2009 at 4:05 PM
Fund the money hole!
My dad worked 2 jobs so he’d have money to throw in the great big hole.
lorien1973 on February 9, 2009 at 4:05 PM
$2 billion for manufacturing advanced batteries for hybrid cars
Cylon technology? Obama really is leading us all to our end.
/sarc
MrX on February 9, 2009 at 4:06 PM
start of the Obama Youth Corps.(draft) we made a big deal of couple months back?
jp on February 9, 2009 at 4:06 PM
That’s not enough money to provide for ten percent of the sewage in this bill.
Vashta.Nerada on February 9, 2009 at 4:06 PM
Limbaugh just demonstrated how parts of the Dem’s National Health program are also included, particularly the digitalization of health records and means testing for patient treatments by a national oversight board which decides if treatments are cost effective, considering life span, etc. Looks like they are slipping that in undercover.
a capella on February 9, 2009 at 4:06 PM
Isn’t global warming doing this for, like, free?
lorien1973 on February 9, 2009 at 4:07 PM
Well, duh!
ladyingray on February 9, 2009 at 4:07 PM
no wonder they are in a rush, if this list becomes common knowledge this bill could implode.
rob verdi on February 9, 2009 at 4:07 PM
Isn’t a box of bullets like $5?
lorien1973 on February 9, 2009 at 4:08 PM
This will be the mother of all spending bills that will finally sink the democratic party. It might sink our political system as we know it. I have a funny feeling that something major is about to break. And I mean break in a “bull in a china shop” sense of break.
izoneguy on February 9, 2009 at 4:08 PM
what is the expiration date on the state slush fund, or do they go on the federal dole permanently now.
rob verdi on February 9, 2009 at 4:08 PM
Lorien, up here for a box of .22 long rifle…. 18.00 to 28.00. I wish they were 5.00.
upinak on February 9, 2009 at 4:08 PM
How about $10 million to build a border wall, then?
Disturb the Universe on February 9, 2009 at 4:09 PM
This list needs to be put on Drudge in Red Font.
Drudge gets Millions of hits and its not all Republicans.
Parlay that with mass emails to everyone you know, for them to fwd. This is the crap the Dems did with Moveon.org emails
jp on February 9, 2009 at 4:09 PM
correction. I’m not sure the means testing is in this bill, Rush may have been referring to parts of Tom Daschle’s book on that one. But it is certainly on the horizen.
a capella on February 9, 2009 at 4:09 PM
Look, I don’t think we even need a stimulus (the market will correct itself), but some of these things seem to immediately create jobs. We need to be careful to only attack those things that are truly wasteful, otherwise the media will point out the few overreaches and pounce.
Things I don’t mind:
Trent1289 on February 9, 2009 at 4:09 PM
This debacle is going to raise future tax rates so high that there won’t be any more private sector jobs. And that is the whole point of this farce.
pedestrian on February 9, 2009 at 4:10 PM
Seems to me, that for $18-$20 (upinaks number, i dont own a gun) you could stop em without a fence.
lorien1973 on February 9, 2009 at 4:10 PM
I have yet to see anything in this bill that will “stimulate” me to go out and spend money. I am a small business accountant dealing with successful entrepreneurs and most of my clients are dealing with the uncertainty by cutting expenses and hording cash. This isn’t a result of current problems but looking forward to what will happen after the “stimulus ” bill passes. None of my clients (or friends for that matter) believe that this bill has anything in it for them. All see higher taxes on the way to pay for those who will benefit.
Ann on February 9, 2009 at 4:10 PM
Obama may use his trusted Policy advisor, Chris Rock, to tax bullets to where each Bullet cost $50,000
that would help pay for this bill afterall..
jp on February 9, 2009 at 4:10 PM
Stimulus Spends Money Too Fast for Accountability: Bush Blamed
obladioblada on February 9, 2009 at 4:11 PM
Lack of accountability is the goal. It is not a problem.
MarkTheGreat on February 9, 2009 at 4:12 PM
real Economic “Stimulation” would be to get rid of some regulations, lower Corporate and Investment Taxes and then watch the economy explode.
The money is out there, its just sitting on the sidelines with no Confidence.
jp on February 9, 2009 at 4:12 PM
We need more overseers to tell us how to spend our money.
lorien1973 on February 9, 2009 at 4:13 PM
The original conversion program provided money for converters basically because the shift to digital TV was ordered by the FCC, it wasn’t a market driven change. The FCC ordered the change in order to free up the spectrun used by analog TV for other services such as enhanced mobile telephone, advanced wireless networks, etc. It idea was that the FCC would auction off the spectrum as they have with other spectrum and this would bring in far, far more money to the treasury (taxpayers) than the cost of the conversion program.
Now there are allegations of political favoritism, one of Obama’s friends and advisors is involved with Sprint as I recall and it is in their best interests to delay the availability of spectrum to their competitors. Washington never changes.
johnsteele on February 9, 2009 at 4:13 PM
Once each bureaucracy is created to spend the money……….
………… it will never go away.
Seven Percent Solution on February 9, 2009 at 4:13 PM
In the above I forgot: Hope and Change :-)
johnsteele on February 9, 2009 at 4:14 PM
All too true. One of the things Reagan wanted to do was kill the Dept of Education. He never managed to pull it off and look at it now.
johnsteele on February 9, 2009 at 4:15 PM
Republicans need to stand firm against this administration and the Pelosi wing of the party. Obviously there will be plenty of rope to go round.
moxie_neanderthal on February 9, 2009 at 4:15 PM
Fish and Wildlife services? You are kidding right? Do you hunt or fish? Do you have any clues as to the regulations of certain items which are not concidered such as carrying capacity or conservation… by the Hunters and Fishermen? Also since the the BLM (Bureau of land management) is the Fish and Wildlife. UGH!!!!
The Bureau of Indian Affairs? You are smoking crack right????? Did you read ANY of the Stimulus???
upinak on February 9, 2009 at 4:17 PM
Sweet, more money for Amtrak, the government-owned train service that hasn’t turned a profit in 38 years. That will turn the economy around. *sigh*
Daft Punk on February 9, 2009 at 4:17 PM
if GOP can’t turn nation against this, we are screwed.
maybe this is testing just that, to see how much crap they really can get away with. before they go for the really Marxist, scary stuff.
jp on February 9, 2009 at 4:19 PM
Anyone have any idea how long it takes requisitions for construction and such to get through the federal bureaucracy???
I can just see this getting so bogged down in red-tape, that these projects get delayed for years.
I mean, don’t they have to fill environmental impact statements, permits, and what not with all this construction?
Is TAO just gonna wave a magic wand and make that all go away?
And then there will be the minority and union clauses so that everyone gets their fair share of the payoff.
Keith_Indy on February 9, 2009 at 4:19 PM
It’s more like effectiveness testing. What procedures are “effective,” i.e, including with what groups (age, for example). Once this is in place, they’ll have the basis for health care rationing (“not cost-effective-denied”), and a way of tracking doctor’s compliance (along with refusing to pay for anything not on the approved list, of course.)
This health care effectiveness panel is in the bill.
From the WSJ article on Canda’s health care system:
The Charter is their Bill of Rights.
Wethal on February 9, 2009 at 4:19 PM
I’m being lazy by asking but you seem to have done some research on this. Is there a black market in healthcare in Canada or other nationalized healthcare country?
genso on February 9, 2009 at 4:23 PM
The GOP’s only talking point needs to be in front of this list and then ask this simple question to the audience:
“How do any of these help you if you’re unemployed or if you’re in danger of losing your home?”
That’s it. It would speak to everyone about the irrelevance of this plan to the current situation.
beatcanvas on February 9, 2009 at 4:23 PM
Wait! There’s money for summer jobs for youth? That’s it, I’m on board now that I know that by September the economy will be zooming up, up, up.
Buy Danish on February 9, 2009 at 4:25 PM
I think that’s the point.
It’s not about ‘stimulating the economy’. It’s about consolidating even more power & control by not letting “a serious crisis go to waste.”
locomotivebreath1901 on February 9, 2009 at 4:26 PM
which of these areas is Soros connected to?
jp on February 9, 2009 at 4:28 PM
I remember seeing a Discovery show about a year ago about this new science lab they built in Antartica. This building, which was big (50,000 to 100,000 sq ft.), was built on stilts. Why? So they could raise the building in case the snow underneath started to consume the building. I think they could raise the building up to 20 ft.
What’s your guess that they are studing global warming in this building?
WashJeff on February 9, 2009 at 4:28 PM
This is a spending/appropriations bill. Pure and simple. Since the Federal “gubernment” is at the center of this you can be damn sure that the numbers you see here will go well above the advertised price tag. When you add the interest rates to the money we’ll have to borrow from China, Dubai, et al, the final cost to America will be astronomical. This for the mere expansion of the Feds.
Generally speaking I typically multiply the “gubernment” numbers by 1.5 for the final cost. So a projected cost of 500 million becomes 750 million. Local and state governments typically require a factor of 2X since most of the time cost overruns approach double the projected costs.
Mr Gus on February 9, 2009 at 4:28 PM
Some of those listed above would create jobs I think, but not enough of them. This bill shuld be chock a block full of these and little else in my opinion. I don’t like it, but would grudgingly accept it if this were the case.
jeanie on February 9, 2009 at 4:29 PM
I’ve heard that we could pay off about 90% of the mortgages in this country with the amount of money this bill will cost (or we could pay 90% of EVERYONE’s mortgage). That alternative would certainly save homeowners as well as stimulate the heck out of the economy.
sirnapsalot on February 9, 2009 at 4:30 PM
After watching what happened with Boston’s Big Dig and watching the cost estimates of light rail in Seattle constantly go up due to “unforseen” issues, the funds in this bill for construction are, in all likelihood only a down payment with someone in a few years time being left holding the empty wallet while trying to finish the projects.
This bill will cost WE, the Taxpayers, two to three times more than the current face “value”.
SouthernRoots on February 9, 2009 at 4:30 PM
Sorry, I just follow it in the WSJ, NRO and a few other places that have analyzed the plan from the conservative point of view. The WSJ article is in today’s on-line edition on the editorial page.
I do know Great Britain has National Health, but also has private insurers like BUPA. I expect Obama’s plan is to make it so difficult for a private company to make a profit that they all fold.
Wethal on February 9, 2009 at 4:31 PM
Billions of gold linings, a million here, a million there, for the pockets of each and every petty bureaucrat. It’s a No accountability free-for-all! Money to build schools where they are closing what they have due to declining enrollment. Where do you really think all that moolah will end up? This is a crime, many crimes, lined up and ready to be committed. This much money sitting around waiting to be spent is perfect for larcenous minds and purposes.
marybel on February 9, 2009 at 4:31 PM
Yes actually, I have read it.
The Fish and Wildlife portion of the bill reads “for priority road and bridge repair and replacement and critical deferred maintenance and improvement.”
For the Indian Affairs portion, the bill reads “for priority repair and replacement of schools, detention centers, roads, bridges, employee housing and critical deferred maintenance projects. ”
All construction jobs. Look, you can hate the agency receiving the money all you’d like, but (at least in an ideal world) this money isn’t going towards their projects and ideas, it’s only being spent on infrastructure and maintenance projects.
Trent1289 on February 9, 2009 at 4:31 PM
Thanks for the reply. I figure that it will be the doctors who see the immorality of this kind of system that might do some after-hour practice. Money will find a way and there will be a lot of doctors taking pay cuts.
genso on February 9, 2009 at 4:34 PM
$522M for construction of the Bureau of Indian Affairs?
They must have designed an amazing building. By comparison, the 60-story Trump Tower in Chicago was $800 million.
sherry on February 9, 2009 at 4:34 PM
I thought of that too, then I thought of the woman who crowed that Obama was going to pay her mortgage and put gas in her tank.
When you bail out people once, they come back for more (think of the deadbeat sponging relative). It would be the end of adult responsibity. Which, of course, is the point of making people dependent on the government. They let the government take care of them, and make their choices. Avoiding all risk and abdicating liberty.
Wethal on February 9, 2009 at 4:35 PM
One thing that amuses me???
This IS a spending and appropriations bill…
But Congress didn’t pass ANY of the REAL spending and appropriation bills for last year…. we are still on a conitnuing Resolution.
So, they will still have to do the regular bills… which is where this spending should have been in the first place, if it was so important.
Romeo13 on February 9, 2009 at 4:36 PM
Thanks. Your terminology is the correct one.
Not a good time to be entering the golden years or have a condition commonly refractive to treatment.
a capella on February 9, 2009 at 4:37 PM
Let’s combine these two programs. It beats makework for inner-city youth.
If that’s too harsh, fine. Increase the budget for fighting gunrunners a hundred- or a thousand-fold. Take if from the ACORN funding if that’s still in there.
As for the summer jobs, put them on trains and send them to the agricultural regions of the country to do the work otherwise done by the migrant farm workers. A little fresh air and time away from the inner-city would do these kids some good. It’s certainly better than giving them a placard so that they can show up at some community bank to extort money for supposedly discriminatory lending practices.
BuckeyeSam on February 9, 2009 at 4:37 PM
“Weimar Republic…here we come.”
sdd on February 9, 2009 at 4:40 PM
No culture wars please.
Trent1289 on February 9, 2009 at 4:40 PM
I think McCaskill has let out that if stuff was cut, they’d just put it back into the supplemental appropriations bill that is coming up in the near future. Supposed to be in the trillions, too. And then there’s TARP II… Drudge estimate – close to $10 trillion in the coming weeks in spending. And then there’s the 2010 budget.
Wethal on February 9, 2009 at 4:40 PM
From an e-mail sent around work:
Makes me want to puke.
Count to 10 on February 9, 2009 at 4:41 PM
Ed,
I’ve come to the conclusion that you are simply uneducable. If you really understood free market capitalism, and spent less time in the middle of the road, you would know that the only thing that makes sense is a bill that spends exactly ZERO dollars.
Only reducing the amount of Federal dollars spent is moral and practical. Only repealing legislation that brought America to this point (the list is nearly endless) is moral and practical. Only radically reducing the scope of Federal power is moral and practical.
There is a place in life for compromise. This is not it.
JDPerren on February 9, 2009 at 4:43 PM
The stimulus is like trying to flush a 20 lb canned ham down the toilet. There’s going to be alot of sharpnel, and the vast majority of it is going into the sewer.
Chuck Schick on February 9, 2009 at 4:44 PM
More love for Big Labor
Brat on February 9, 2009 at 4:46 PM
I’m not paying my taxes.
madmonkphotog on February 9, 2009 at 4:47 PM
Until they can implant the nuero-receivers in our brains, TV is the best way to feed us their daily pablum. So you see, it is terribly important to our free-spendin’ overlords.
juanito on February 9, 2009 at 4:54 PM
Yet The Messiah stood there in Elkhart today and brazenly declared that there is not a single earmark in this bill! Does he think nobody in this country can READ?
rockmom on February 9, 2009 at 4:57 PM
Obama’s turning the US government into Illinois’.
snickelfritz on February 9, 2009 at 4:58 PM
>>$10 million to fight Mexican gunrunners.
Translation – We need to close the loop hole so American citizens cant buy guns, that way they cant be stolen or illegally sold and will never reach the hands of Mexican gunrunners.
Badbrucskie on February 9, 2009 at 5:08 PM
Ummmmm…why would we need a “polar ice breaker” when, according to algore, Global Warming is melting the Polar ice cap?
uncivilized on February 9, 2009 at 5:26 PM
The economy is going to stroke out on all that pork. We’ve just guaranteed several years of “scandals” regarding “stimulus package fraud”.
GarandFan on February 9, 2009 at 5:29 PM
Comment pages: 1 2 Next »