The Steele purge at the RNC

posted at 10:37 am on February 6, 2009 by Ed Morrissey

During the mini-campaign for the RNC chair since the disastrous national election (for Republicans, anyway), we heard rumblings that the most famous of the candidates might not get much institutional support.  According to Ben Smith, the feeling was mutual.  Michael Steele, fresh off of his fourth-ballot victory, wants to put his own imprint on the party — and has requested the resignations of the entire RNC staff as a start:

A Republican source says newly elected Republican National Committee Chairman Michael Steele has requested the resignations of the entire RNC staff and signaled a dramatic turnover at the party organization.

Some aides may be retained, though Republicans are under the impression that Steele will lead a large-scale changeover in the institution, which has about 100 staffers. Obama’s new team at the Democratic National Committee also requested mass resignations.

Many, including communications staffers, have been told their last day is Feb. 15.

Steele has a difficult task ahead of him, which is to convince voters that the GOP has changed and learned from two successive electoral defeats.  His election may give evidence to that, but until Steele shows some strength and — dare I say — change, that election will just look cosmetic.  In order to build on his own strength, the organization has to reflect Steele and his agenda for revamping the Republican Party into a force for majority rule.

It’s also not anything unexpected.  Political organizations usually have staff purges when new management arrives.  Many people leave on their own volition, either out of disagreement with the new governing philosophy or just to make sure they don’t get laid off with no other prospects.  Ben notes that the Democrats did the same thing, and for much the same reason — to put Obama’s stamp on the DNC.

With the Republicans, though, one has to wonder whether any other candidate would have replaced the entire staff as Steele did.  Ken Blackwell may have, as another outsider, but Mike Duncan would have kept his entire team in place.  Katon Dawson and Chip Saltsman, as relative insiders, might have looked for continuity, too.  Right now, continuity isn’t what the GOP needs.

Blowback

Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.

Trackbacks/Pings

Trackback URL

Comments

Comment pages: 1 2

eaglescout1998 on February 6, 2009 at 1:07 PM

Yeah, great minds….

HornetSting on February 6, 2009 at 1:25 PM

Global Warming coexist in a coherent philosophy?

Romeo13 on February 6, 2009 at 12:56 PM

I haven’t found much on his stance, do you have a quote or a link regarding his global warming beliefs?

right2bright on February 6, 2009 at 1:08 PM

Can I assume there is nothing to back up that statement, or at least anything significant as of now?
I haven’t found anything to show he is supporting Global Warming, but I just spent a few minutes Googling…let me know what you have to make that statement.

right2bright on February 6, 2009 at 1:30 PM

I would also like to see all primaries be closed primaries. A primary election is an internal party matter and should not be subject to influence by non-party members.

eaglescout1998 on February 6, 2009 at 1:35 PM

eaglescout1998 on February 6, 2009 at 1:35 PM

Ditto, ditto and ditto!!!!!!!!!!!!

oakpack on February 6, 2009 at 1:43 PM

purge them all!!!

scottjenn on February 6, 2009 at 2:31 PM

Shake it up!! (tune courtesy of The Cars)

Maquis on February 6, 2009 at 2:33 PM

Go after Snowe and all the TRAITORS! Call them out by name, let them caucus with the far left radicals, call them out I say!

Mark Garnett on February 6, 2009 at 2:54 PM

His housecleaning idea is great if he replaces the old with TRUE CONSERVATIVES. We have to get back to the conservative roots and stop trying to act like the Dems.

UnEasyRider on February 6, 2009 at 3:12 PM

right2bright on February 6, 2009 at 1:30 PM

Sorry, some of us do have lives outside of blogging…

When Steele was running for RNC chair, there was a position statement on it on the Steele for site…. but its apparently gone down the memory hole… I remember it being there, but can’t proove it…

What I did find interesting, when I went and looked was that there is apparently NOTHING Steele says about Global Warming out there.

Lots of stuff where he talks about Green Energy… and Ethanol type stuff… and Alternative energy… ie, very typical green language… but nothing on waming itself…

I find that…. interesting… this is a MAJOR issue with a lot of people, and to have NO idea of what his stand is on the issue?

Romeo13 on February 6, 2009 at 3:13 PM

After the vote on the Porkulus, Specter, Snow and Collins will be the three most unpopular people in the GOP. Will Steele support snow and specter in 2010 vs conservative challengers? that is the test.

james23 on February 6, 2009 at 3:42 PM

This is surprising.
It shows he really sees the party getting hung up on infighting. Sarah Palin would have done well to fire her staff, instead of letting them sabotage her.
The chatosphere in the last few weeks has demonstrated to me that the party is very diverse, not monolithic. The meaning of RINO is very subjective. And, Michael is going to do what any good organization should do, surround yourself with people whose talent you trust and know you.
It should be a no-brainer. But, considering that the statistical favourite has done so well at losing the last 3 years, fresh brains are very much in order.
MICHAEL, I NEED A JOB

anti-boomer on February 6, 2009 at 3:43 PM

Michael Steele was the person who apparently promulgated the “Drill, Baby, Drill” line regarding energy. http://blogs.wsj.com/washwire/2008/09/03/steele-gives-gop-delegates-new-cheer-drill-baby-drill/
Does that change anyone’s analysis about Steele’s alleged support for oppressive regulatory regimes to combat “global climate change?”

Outlander on February 6, 2009 at 3:55 PM

Outlander on February 6, 2009 at 3:55 PM

McCain was suddenly for drilling at that point too… and we know his position on CO2 Cap and Trade…

I’m still looking for somthing Steele said, either way… interesting there is so little out there…

Romeo13 on February 6, 2009 at 4:00 PM

Good for Michael Steele. At last someone to clean house. There are a few GOP senators that need to go as well. We know who those RINO’s are.

generouse on February 6, 2009 at 4:31 PM

Good for Michael Steele. At last someone to clean house. There are a few GOP senators that need to go as well. We know who those RINO’s are.

generouse on February 6, 2009 at 4:31 PM

We DO know who the RINOs are and Steele is one of them.
Don’t forget: Steele supports Gun Bans, Roe V Wade, and Affirmative Action.

Three of the most CRITICAL Conservative ideals and Steele doesn’t support them!

Just exactly HOW is Steele going to clean house of RINOs when he IS ONE?

nelsonknows on February 6, 2009 at 6:15 PM

just for those who are too lazy or stupid to do their homework on Michael Steele:

On gun bans:
Q: Should people have access to buy assault weapons?

A: Society should draw lines. What do you need an assault weapon for, if you’re going hunting? That’s overkill. But I don’t think that means you go to a total ban for those who want to use gun for skeet shooting or hunting or things like that But what’s the point of passing gun laws if we’re not going to enforce them? If you want to talk about gun control, that’s where you need to start. We’ve got 300 gun laws on the books right now. At the end of the day, it’s about how we enforce the law.

On Roe V Wade:
Q: Would you hope the US Supreme Court overturns Roe v. Wade?

A: My desire is that we follow what stare decisis is at this point. (Latin for “to stand by a decision,”)

On Affirmative Action:
I support the current system and improvements to the current system, keeping in mind that while we have done very well in affirmative action at our universities across this country, I look at our boardrooms across the country, I look at NBC, CNBC, Fox, all these stations, all the corporate, corporate companies-and I don’t see affirmative action necessarily being practiced there when I look at the management, when I look at the leadership, when I look at those who have a decision-making role.

Q: Are federal affirmative action programs necessary and effective?

A: Studies show enormous disparities still exist in education, healthcare, employment and economic opportunities along racial lines in the United States. I believe programs are still necessary to help close these divides. I support giving people opportunities. Programs must be fair to all Marylanders – of every color – and they should focus on economic empowerment.

These are quotes from Michael Steele himself.

nelsonknows on February 6, 2009 at 6:25 PM

~In a slow guttural tone~ …PURGE…purge them all….;)

jerrytbg on February 6, 2009 at 7:45 PM

too bad his being the first African American in this is dwarfed by Bomma making a black ‘first’. Thats my only regret at this point.

johnnyU on February 7, 2009 at 9:44 AM

Comment pages: 1 2