Quote of the day

Tanenhaus’ observation that the modern American right

defines itself not by what it yearns to conserve but by what it longs to destroy–”statist” social programs; “socialized medicine”; “big labor”; “activist” Supreme Court justices, the “media elite”; “tenured radicals” on university faculties; “experts” in and out of government.

These particular resentments as we have seen provide a very poor basis for governing.

And by “experts” in and out of government, reference SELF PROCLAIMED experts like Al Gore who never graduated from college but assumes expertise with his illogical defiance of historical records.

In order to conserve, where neo-liberal progression has erased the Constitution’s integrity to the point that rule of law no longer exists in daily life and in the courts, recognizing what went wrong focuses efforts for the rectification of the Constitution.

A basic differentiation between conservative (Constitution) vs. neo-liberal (not Classical Liberal) social conscience is tolerance. Conservatives tolerate liberals so far as the Constitution is not revised or obliterated by usurping Socialists. Whereas, neo-liberals do not tolerate conservatives under any circumstance. Therein, neo-liberals are NOT liberals, and have not been Liberals for a century. And the Socialist revision of textual definitions is a reprehensible means to demise civilization. “It depends on what the meaning of IS is.”

Tanenhaus is stuck on stupid.

As per incrimination of Palin, suck eggs. Her “fault” rests in association with the dud (not Dude) McCain. Her talents are exactly what the media WISH TO HIGH HEAVEN that Obama actually possesses. Since their dud Obama is such a loser, their best defense is to persist in offense. That rationale doesn’t legitimize their propaganda. On the contrary. To simply defile virtue “because you could” is all the more heinous.

Palin has plenty to learn, as does every person on earth. Unlike Obama, however, Palin learns. And Palin has the right instincts, so very unlike Obama. And Palin has executive experience. Meanwhile, Obama is exploiting the nation with his on the job training.

maverick muse on February 7, 2009 at 8:01 AM

To argue that given the current dire economy, the only correct legislative measure is to tax more in order to maintain big government ignores the alternative to cut government and delay projects until funds become available during an economic upswing.

Palin is not necessarily wrong to keep the tax burden low on Alaskans, particularly knowing that Obama and Congress hold the entire State of Alaska in the lowest regards with vindictive measures ahead, both in taxation and in depletion of business opportunities against Alaskans. Telling her state legislature to tighten the belt is the FIRST order of business for every responsible public servant.

See how Obama neglects the victims of the Bible Belt in dire storms now. Economy aside, Obama is physically abusive and cruel to the weak and the elderly, just as he was in Chicago. Obama consistently took tax money meant to provide clean living standards at public housing and every other project he “assisted” to enrich his own organized crime associates while leaving the wretched to worse ruin than before his criminal community organizing plague hit town. Obama kicks dead horses to make sure there’s nothing more to be had from the poor beast.

Palin would never execute such governance. She would personally direct the search to deliver life’s necessities to folks frozen in a storm.

maverick muse on February 7, 2009 at 8:27 AM