Octuplets’ mom pretty sure she’ll be able to pay for kids — after she’s out of school
posted at 6:20 pm on February 6, 2009 by Allahpundit
Share on Facebook | printer-friendly
She’ll get around to it eventually. But first she needs to get that master’s degree she’s had her eye on. And then the money, it shall flow like a mighty river.
How much worse can this story get? Dude:
Nadya Suleman, 33, became pregnant with all 14 of her children after a 1999 injury during a riot at a state mental hospital where she worked, state Division of Workers’ Compensation documents show.
She stopped working, but had the six older children during that time, notes Early Show national correspondent Hattie Kauffman…
There were also mental health issues, Kauffman reports. Suleman was labeled as being at some risk for suicide, and diagnosed with a “depressive disorder.”
She collected just north of $165K in workers’ comp, which got cut off last year. The injury reportedly prevents her from “prolonged sitting, standing and walking,” but as long as none of those skills are required, the job market’s wide open. Exit question: Lauer asks Ann Curry how she’s planning to pay for the kids while she’s in school, to which the reply is, “She’s trying to figure that out.” Was even a moment’s thought given to financial planning at any point during this pregnancy?
Visit msnbc.com for Breaking News, World News, and News about the Economy
You must be logged in to post a comment.
Blowback
Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.
Trackbacks/Pings
Trackback URL
Comments
Comment pages: 1 2 Next »
Uh…yet she had 14 kids?
amerpundit on February 6, 2009 at 6:23 PM
Too bad Nadys’s mother did not use birth control.
infidel on February 6, 2009 at 6:23 PM
When the embryos were implanted, she was neither sitting, standing, nor walking, right?
unclesmrgol on February 6, 2009 at 6:24 PM
Fixed.
Cicero43 on February 6, 2009 at 6:24 PM
Fan-effin-tastic.
Stay out of the clinic, you skank!
HornetSting on February 6, 2009 at 6:27 PM
As a father whom pays child support, if I was the Doner Daddy I’d be sweating bullets at this time.
Alex Martinez on February 6, 2009 at 6:27 PM
How about when she delivered the kids?
amerpundit on February 6, 2009 at 6:28 PM
School? Ridiculous. Why? She assured herself of a full time job with her birthing addiction.
Can you imagine the stupidity of her sliding out to school every morning leaving the baby care to someone?
Also, no matter what she studies she will never earn the amount of money it will require to keep those 14 children fed and clothed. Poor kids.
FireBlogger on February 6, 2009 at 6:28 PM
Its the same amount of delusion it took to birth 16 babies as it takes to think even a Psychiatrist makes six figures and that much isn’t enough to support through college that many children.
Speakup on February 6, 2009 at 6:31 PM
Allah,
Leave it to you to focus the hate away from the crime going on in the Senate on an idiot Californian.
Here’s the quick response:
This woman is an unhinged loon who shouldn’t have any children let alone 14.
Her parents are enablers who should be ashamed of themselves.
Her doctors should have their licenses revoked for allowing this pregnancy in the first place.
Where did this woman get the money for the treatments necessary for this birth?
Why did she seek to bring life into the world when she’s unemployed and living at home (re: the enabler comment).
I hope this woman’s 14 kids don’t suffer but I have no compassion for the mother (aka birth unit).
highhopes on February 6, 2009 at 6:31 PM
I listened in horror to her today. She isn’t even fazed by the enormity of raising 14 children to be useful citizens. There really is something wrong with her. She hasn’t a clue about what she’s taken on or the responsibility she’s shouldered. Those kids and she need to be under constant scrutiny. There is trouble ahead.
jeanie on February 6, 2009 at 6:31 PM
I’m glad to see that everybody here is wishing her well.
Maxx on February 6, 2009 at 6:32 PM
Well, it looks as if she had enough money to get those freaky lip injections that insane women think look sexy.
Opinionnation on February 6, 2009 at 6:32 PM
Oh I don’t know, she should get a BA in political science. She’s as qualified as Obama to be President. Maybe she could get that job in four years. That would provide the kind of income she needs.
highhopes on February 6, 2009 at 6:34 PM
She’s counting on help from her dysfunctional family?
How much did NBC pay for this exclusive?
ctmom on February 6, 2009 at 6:36 PM
How much did NBC pay for the exclusive interview?
slp on February 6, 2009 at 6:37 PM
Why should she be “wished well?” for this?
The anti-Christian crowd hates the Duggar family who have 17? kids (and a series on TLC) but you know what. Those kids are happy, the family doesn’t rely on welfare to raise their kids, and they are really a family.
Not the case when an unemployed woman decides to pump out an additional eight lives with no apparent means of being able to support them.
highhopes on February 6, 2009 at 6:38 PM
And California just got another state-sponsored day care center.
sherry on February 6, 2009 at 6:39 PM
It’s obvious this woman is demented and has some sort of Angelina Jolie complex. Jolie has many children (and at multiple births as well), but look at this woman’s face — she’s obviously had work done to try and look like the actress. Sad…
D2Boston on February 6, 2009 at 6:39 PM
You’ve got to be kidding. Obviously this girl has a screw loose and those kids are going to become wards of the state. She’s like the crazy lady who has dozens of cats in her house.
ctmom on February 6, 2009 at 6:40 PM
Am I the only one who doesn’t give a damn about this story and wishes it would stop popping up?
Darth Executor on February 6, 2009 at 6:40 PM
Freaking train wreck. Anyone who hits adulthood and immediately seeks personal identity through mass offspring has a host of issues. Fourteen kids is a nightmare, expecting the public to be amazed and impressed, yielding money and goods is outrageous.
Even more sick is the attempt at using this to bash pro-lifers, strawmanning that they support it, which I don’t.
Child abuse.
MarcusBrody on February 6, 2009 at 6:41 PM
Hey! You don’t think that 14 kids is going to keep this woman away from clubbing with her girlfriends on the weekends do you?
highhopes on February 6, 2009 at 6:41 PM
Is she going to pay the medical bill of over $1000 per day per child in the neo natal icu, not including the doctors bill for months? Then the taking home of the kids expense. You, lady need some major help.
L
letget on February 6, 2009 at 6:41 PM
no
Jamson64 on February 6, 2009 at 6:42 PM
Wow…the meanness here gets worse all the time.
Wish the woman well, and her children, too. What is wrong with you all?
Yeah, maybe she’s mental….she’s not alone out there.
Cast the first stone, eh?
sheesh
bridgetown on February 6, 2009 at 6:43 PM
lorien1973 saying he’ld hit it, in 5, 4, 3, ….
mrfixit on February 6, 2009 at 6:45 PM
That woman has been under the knife for more than babies. She looks like she’s been botoxed and lifted to within an inch of her life.
Creee-py.
spmat on February 6, 2009 at 6:45 PM
I was thinking as Matt Lauer congratulated Ann Curry for getting the interview, “Don’t congratulate her. Congratulate all those pictures of Benjamin Franklin.”
L.N. Smithee on February 6, 2009 at 6:45 PM
Oh! I don’t think so. There are rules about how many infants can be in one of those places as a ratio to adults (and listening to this woman I’m guessing the current number is zero). So unless the state pays staff to come in, this isn’t a day care center.
highhopes on February 6, 2009 at 6:45 PM
This person is bat-$hit crazy. I’ll start the countdown to the inevitable foster care round-up.
Claypigeon on February 6, 2009 at 6:46 PM
it’s just what this country needs…
14 future idiots having more idiots, while grandma-idiot has lived long enough that technology can revive her dried up uterus so she can give birth to a whole new litter of idiots.
Opinionnation on February 6, 2009 at 6:48 PM
I agree with you. I was being flip simply because all eyes are on this woman and the bleeding hearts will find a way for state funds to be distributed to her. I don’t see any sponsors like Pampers or Gerbers touching this with a ten-foot pole.
sherry on February 6, 2009 at 6:49 PM
Tim Zank on February 6, 2009 at 6:49 PM
I’m just glad she had time to get her lips augmented.
savvydude on February 6, 2009 at 6:50 PM
Wh*re.
KSgop on February 6, 2009 at 6:50 PM
That’s exactly it. Like cockroaches, the offspring grow exponentially through successive generations, thus ensuring plenty of future enrollees to suckle off the government welfare teat.
KSgop on February 6, 2009 at 6:52 PM
I wish her well. Sincerely. And I hope for the very best for her many children.
The point (regardless of what you read here) is not to denigrate the woman; the point is to learn something as a society – so that this does not happen again.
I think it safe to assume that everybody hopes, at the very least, that her children grow up happy and healthy. But there are doubts about that happening – because of her choices.
Professor Blather on February 6, 2009 at 6:52 PM
Brainless freak.
Hardly any other way to put it.
Pray for the kids though, it gets bumpy from here for them.
Mike D. on February 6, 2009 at 6:53 PM
Wow…the meanness here gets worse all the time.
Wish the woman well, and her children, too. What is wrong with you all?
At one time in America, these actions taken by this lady would have been offensive to most Americans. Now this garbage is top billing.
Alex Martinez on February 6, 2009 at 6:54 PM
Tim Zank on February 6, 2009 at 6:55 PM
She is an EFFING MORON
ihasurnominashun on February 6, 2009 at 6:55 PM
Oh, I think that article makes it clear she has a financial plan and has identified a revenue source…interviews, articles, book sales, Oprah….the NBC story was just free publicity to to bait the hook.
BTW, she has a spokesman! Pretty clear to me what the plan is…she knows how this country works now.
AUINSC on February 6, 2009 at 6:56 PM
With interviews on Today, and Dateline it certainly looks like things are going as planned for her.
DFCtomm on February 6, 2009 at 6:59 PM
A product of the “I want it NOW” generation. She must be a liberal in that she did what felt right with little planning and forethought as to what next.
This is much akin to putting the
cartstroller before thehorsekidkaty on February 6, 2009 at 7:01 PM
No matter how much ‘well’ she is wished or otherwise, it doesn’t change the fact that she is mentally and emotionally unstable. This has the makings of tragedy, not for her perhaps, but for those kids.
jeanie on February 6, 2009 at 7:04 PM
Truth be told!
She is the ultimate semi-human
Breeder COW!
positionsize on February 6, 2009 at 7:04 PM
Re: highhopes 6:38 pm
The Duggar kids are as brainwashed as a North Korean party apparatchik. There’s a difference between happiness and ignorant bliss, you know. It could be worse, though–I can’t see the kids in this family having much of a shot at either happiness or bliss.
hicsuget on February 6, 2009 at 7:07 PM
BULLSHIITE. America was built on the backs of bigass broke families. Get real.
The Race Card on February 6, 2009 at 7:07 PM
Ans. It takes a village (of taxpayers).
whitetop on February 6, 2009 at 7:07 PM
I wish the children well (all 14 of them).
I hope the mother gets the help she needs… and I’m not talking about help with childcare.
malclave on February 6, 2009 at 7:09 PM
What would Ann Coulter say..
the_nile on February 6, 2009 at 7:10 PM
Yeah, bridgetown. Let’s wish her well. In fact, let’s do more than just wish her well, let’s have all the male participants on HA head on down to her doc’s office and donate our sperm so that she can have enough seven more kids, bringing the total to 22. Then they could have two teams to play touch football against each other!
You say “what is wrong with you all” — what’s wrong with YOU that you can’t see that no one single woman with no means of support should be popping out children to make up for a lonely childhood? That schtuff is already going on among teenage girls nowadays, but most of the time, they wise up after one or two, and there is usually someone they can sic the law on to help pay for their young ones. This lunatic planned to have seven children without a father (hello, Dan Quayle!), and seems to think that her masters degree (In WHAT? From WHERE?) is going to bring her enough money to raise a family of FIFTEEN in a job market where people with track records of success and marketable skills are taking pay cuts and going into fields unrelated to their degrees. ‘Wishing her children well’ is wishing at least some of her children go to (preferably) married couples who are responsible members of society, not staying in a madhouse run by a mad woman who can’t take care of herself without workers’ comp!
And please, knock off the gratuitous, out-of-context “cast the first stone” nonsense. In that scriptural account, nobody dared stone the harlot to death, but that didn’t mean nobody had the right to call her a harlot because she was a harlot! Sorry! This woman is a lunatic and I’m not going to pretend she’s not just to be “nice.”
L.N. Smithee on February 6, 2009 at 7:11 PM
Headed by single women? From sperm donors? Better get your money back on your history books, bud.
L.N. Smithee on February 6, 2009 at 7:14 PM
BULLSHIITE. America was built on the backs of bigass broke families. Get real.
The Race Card on February 6, 2009 at 7:07 PM
Yea well, big families did make America, as my father had 16 brothers and sisters. But the worked as a family, not as some freeking side show,so you get real!
Alex Martinez on February 6, 2009 at 7:14 PM
It’s like she’s starting her own army of morons.
TheSitRep on February 6, 2009 at 7:15 PM
She’s actually pretty. I was surprised. I figured she’s be unfortunate looking and that it would explain her need for unconditional love in the form of children.
I don’t know. Yes, she’s out of her mind, but I just can’t bring myself to be angry at her. She’s not on welfare, so it doesn’t affect me anyway. And in our current culture where two kids is one too many for most, I’m kinda glad to see someone have a ton of kids even though I think she’s made horrible decisions.
Esthier on February 6, 2009 at 7:19 PM
“Get real” is advice you should follow.
Certainly, Americans historically had large – and poor – families. But those large families served a specific purpose: free, high-quality labor. If you lived on a farm in Tennessee in 1870, your 14 children were how you survived. They pitched in and you all ensured your collective survival.
But you think THAT is what’s going to happen here? You think these 14 children are going to turn into a 21st century version of the Walton family?
Please. You know perfectly well what is likely to happen to this family and these children. Get real indeed.
Professor Blather on February 6, 2009 at 7:21 PM
I have two sons one just went into the marines
i am so proud of him..
With both myself and wife working
and 2o layoffs in 30 years
and 6 career changes
I could barely afford a 2 year colege degree
How in the hell does this woman think she will even be able to FEED 14 kids by herself..
something is wrong here..
I knew a family of 10 children and both the dad working full time and the mom at home full time
barely were able to make it..
so there is no way 1 woman can do this alone..
im sorry
where are all of those rich liberals now?
why dont they pay for her bills for the next 20 years?
jcila on February 6, 2009 at 7:23 PM
That’s not fair. Those type of women are paid by men for the privilege of “donating” their sperm. She paid the privilege of receiving it.
L.N. Smithee on February 6, 2009 at 7:24 PM
No but I think you have a great concept for a show there. Goodnight Juanboy.
The Race Card on February 6, 2009 at 7:24 PM
They don’t have to because we all are.
The Race Card on February 6, 2009 at 7:25 PM
Man, my daughter is almost 33 and she doesn’t have ANY children.
Darned responsible kids.
:)
Bob's Kid on February 6, 2009 at 7:35 PM
I call dibs on their Income Tax to fund my Social Security when I retire in 20 years.
Zaire67 on February 6, 2009 at 7:38 PM
The saddest part is that at least half of those kids will be voting for Democrats in 18 years.
Speedwagon82 on February 6, 2009 at 7:50 PM
If I didn’t know better I would say she is among the non taxpaying folks looking for some of that stimulus…..I really think she needs to cut back on any stimulus given she can’t sit, stand or walk. But multiple pregnancies her Doctor told her no problem. BREEDER. Is this what middle eastern women are reduced to if your not earnin your producin?
Dr Evil on February 6, 2009 at 7:53 PM
Try $5K/day x 8 premies = $40K/day x 42 days (6wks) = $1.68M just to get out of the NICU and kinda go home, maybe. Some good news is that many NICU student nurses and several Neonatal resident docs will learn a great deal about how to take care of these multiple premies who are at real risk of not making it. God help them all. I am most disgusted by that stupid selfish woman for putting her babies in such grave danger in and ex utero.
gracie on February 6, 2009 at 8:06 PM
Just think. The kids will be on welfare soon, food stamps, and addicted to the democrat rolls.
Kini on February 6, 2009 at 8:18 PM
Thankfully, the government will use its guns to come and steal some of my money to help this unfortunate loser of life’s lottery. God Bless America!
It’s the Idiocracy. It’s really happening!
King of the Britons on February 6, 2009 at 8:26 PM
I want to know:
1) Is this woman and her family covered by private health insurance or medicaid (or SCHIP)? I know she gave birth at Kaiser, but I have it on very good authority that she isn’t a member of that health plan. If her maternity adventures have all been on the taxpayer’s dime, it isn’t really accurate to say, as she has, that she isn’t on welfare.
2) Who paid for the in vitro? It’s a very pricey procedure that isn’t covered by most private health plans or, I assume, any taxpayer funded program. Or am I wrong about that?
It would be nice if the MSM had a little more curiosity about this aspect of the story.
Infidoll on February 6, 2009 at 8:26 PM
Look, just because you LOOK like Angelina Jolie doesn’t mean you should be in a contest to see if you could have more kids than she has.
ScoopPC11 on February 6, 2009 at 8:30 PM
More stimulative spending for the over stimulated.
We only need a few more thousand Nadya Suleman’s and this economy will start to roar back.
moxie_neanderthal on February 6, 2009 at 8:33 PM
So the kids who are posting nude pictures of themselves on their MySpace pages, with an Obama
ObeyHope poster on their walls, and attending the social engineering farms we call public schools are not?People have the right to protect their kids from the decay of modern society if they want to. The difference between this cow and the Duggars is the Duggars have two parents and they pay for their own children. You and I and the people of California are paying for this loon’s kids.
ExcessivelyDiverted on February 6, 2009 at 8:37 PM
Having seen the fallout from selfish parenting up close, I can only say “those poor kids.”
Guaranteed everything that happens from here on out will be all about Nadya. This is child abuse.
warbaby on February 6, 2009 at 8:39 PM
I hope she makes a large enough windfall to compensate her parents, pay for staff to tend to the practical tasks involved in this intensive next decade for this incredible brood.
If any blame is to be apportioned it belongs with the institutions and medical personnel involved. When the Doctors said they were ready to murder as many as asked for for a practical number, I wanted to kick said professionals in the nuts.
This unwoven mother needs help not scorn, save that for the Professionals.
BL@KBIRD on February 6, 2009 at 8:51 PM
Actually, she’s got a workers comp file 300 pages deep, and has cost the state over $250k in workers comp alone. Diggers are still digging for more – and I guarantee there’s plenty.
Now get this, all you “big family” proponents: There’s a story on the radio this week (supposedly from a personal friend of the family) that by “trying to have children” she means only artificial methods – she’s a virgin, never had sex. Now THAT’s what I call family values!
peski on February 6, 2009 at 9:10 PM
Not on welfare? Are you kidding me? Her public assistance graph is going to look like a hockey stick.
moxie_neanderthal on February 6, 2009 at 9:14 PM
Exactly – not out business – can’t bring myself to subscribe to the wingnut chicken littles….life’s to short.
Her Masters is almost completed, leave the women alone – mind your business if you dare.
AprilOrit on February 6, 2009 at 9:39 PM
She better watch out where she sits.
Okay, that was way mean. I apologize.
Come on, as for the link, it is better than they sitting around and getting high.
Mr. Joe on February 6, 2009 at 9:40 PM
I will boycott any company that gives this evil piece of garbage so much as a crumb. She did this for a payday, not a family. There are lots of disturbed, desperate, and coniving women out there watching this case. Unless we’re ready to support every fruit loop with a uterus and a turkey baster, don’t encourage the nuts.
Laura in Maryland on February 6, 2009 at 9:48 PM
I hope those kids are ok. There is something off about her. I wish her well though. She mentioned that she will use student loans to go to school??? There are many people in this area that has Masters Degrees in the same field. They cannot get work. Two have their offices in their homes. She had a lot of kids to begin with. There needs to be limits on women that do embryo plants. One thing that bugs me about my former daughter in law is she sells her eggs. That disgust me.
sheebe on February 6, 2009 at 9:50 PM
Exactly, she isn’t on Welfare. She is very pretty. Her mom told her that when she came home she wouldn’t be there. Wonder if she kept her word?
sheebe on February 6, 2009 at 10:05 PM
Maybe that’s how she intends to support her new, huge family.
/sarcasm
That said, how on earth can this woman hold down a job? Child care for 8 (or more) children will far exceed any salary that she can make; she’ll lose money by getting a job. Perhaps, when they are in elementary school, she can get a 9-5 job for them, but any job that pays good money requires hours that are incompatible with being the single mother of 14 children.
The thing that people always forget about Darwinism is that if there are too many dumb members of the species, not only do they die, but the entire species does, too.
Roxeanne de Luca on February 6, 2009 at 10:21 PM
She says all she ever wanted was children and all she ever wanted was to become a mother. And she purposefully decided to have 12 children and 2 extras popped into the scene, and she says that it turned out perfectly.
That sounds like the very definition of crazy to me, even if she was married. Her being a single mother (and in school for that matter!) makes it even more insane.
TheBlueSite on February 6, 2009 at 10:52 PM
I don’t understand how she says she’s going to be “available to her children” and yet she’s going to go to school and get a job to pay for them. How do you make yourself “available” to 8 infants, or to 8 toddlers at a time, not to mention the other six children, plus go to school and get a job.
I have nothing against large families, I think they can be great, but it should be done in a responsible manner. At least have either the money to pay for it, or a spouse or significant other who is there to support you and give their time to the children.
We obviously aren’t seeing what’s going on behind the scenes so I can’t judge her abilities as a mother, but honestly this shouldn’t be something that we embrace or encourage. That said, I wish nothing but the best for the children. They are innocent in this whole deal.
thevastlane on February 6, 2009 at 11:11 PM
This “she’s not on welfare” nonsense (here of all places) has to stop. She may not collect welfare per se, but her medical and delivery costs (which a friend informs me will be in the millions) are all on the taxpayers’ dime. And, although I haven’t had this confirmed yet, I’ll wager her kids’ healthcare is covered under medicaid or SCHIP.
And then there’s her education. Who do you think paid for her college education and, since her circumstances guarantee that she’ll be financial aid eligible well into the future, who do you think will be financing that graduate degree?
Wake up, people.
Infidoll on February 6, 2009 at 11:15 PM
Now why on earth would she worry about paying for her own kids when she KNOWS that we’ll pay for them.
Don’t worry, be happy. Yes we can.
What does she mean, she took a risk? What risk? Single parents are the major supplier of criminals for our society by the way. (I was a single parent for many years so don’t get riled.)
Mojave Mark on February 6, 2009 at 11:59 PM
Maybe my math is way off, but if she holds each child for 45 mins, isn’t that 12 hours or more per day of holding the kids?
TheBlueSite on February 7, 2009 at 12:04 AM
I am sorry i did watch her and she has something wrong upstairs..
i can sense it..
jcila on February 7, 2009 at 12:09 AM
I’ll put in the first $100 to have this psycho-hosebag’s holes sewn shut.
omnipotent on February 7, 2009 at 12:59 AM
Here is the funniest part of this story to me: With this whack job in California, now Angie Everhart is pregnant and bound to raise her child as a single mom…how come the MSM isn’t calling Ann Coulter back for an interview about that chapter in her book about the glorification of the single mom??????
chief65 on February 7, 2009 at 1:09 AM
I feel so bad for those babies, they are never going to get that quality one on one Mommy and Daddy time. Kids need it. I’m an expert in these matters my wife and I raised three kids.
Dadzilla on February 7, 2009 at 2:19 AM
I think I read somewhere that she was seeking a parenting show on TV.
Ugly on February 7, 2009 at 2:56 AM
What really cracks me up is that out here in SOCAL, the local radio hosts call her “OCTOMOM” That’s freaking hilarious. It brings to mind the image of a comic book hero. I can just see it now:
In a small town in Southern California, two masked men barge into a bank with guns drawn, “Put em up, gimme all the money in a bag NOW!” The poor scared teller says,HELP! Where is OCTOMOM??!!Suddenly, out of the corner of her eye, she sees a breast shaped searchlight reflected off the clouds, THEN, just a few minutes later, the doors crash open and in comes, O C T O M O M ! ! !She’s twenty feet tall with seven legs stuffed into fluffy slippers and 18 breasts in a powder blue spandex body suit with a big yellow O on a red shield between each one of her breasts, but you can’t see them because she has a baby in a sling hanging in front of every one of them. The sucking from the babies is so strong that her body seems to contract in and out giving her pulsing body the motion of a beating heart. Her head looks like the queen bee in Alien three…with curlers. Her ears are so sharp as to hear the slight movement of a cookie jar top from the other side of the house. Her superhero utility belt is stuffed with pampers and talc, and when she turns around, you notice a gummy bear stuck to her ass. As she moves her tremondous girth through the doors, breasts quivering and dripping lactation all over, people slipping in the breast milk trying to run out the doors, screaming in terror. The bank robbers, suddently smelling milk, turn around and with a look of absolute horror on their faces scream in unison,Oh My God!! It’s O C T O M O M!!!!Octomom takes one of the shoes off a foot and zings it at the bank robbers bouncing off both their heads. Octomom yells at the robbers in her angriest voice,You are grounded for a month BUSTER, with NO NINTENDO!!Then one robber starts crying and sobs to Octomom,That’s not fair, he made me do it!
Just a thought.
Bikerken on February 7, 2009 at 3:45 AM
This lady is a danger to her kids and they need to be taken from her and put in a foster home where they can receive proper care from a loving parent who isn’t just having them to make money from a publicity stunt.
Vegi on February 7, 2009 at 5:16 AM
That doesn’t bother me as much as the likelihood that the doctor implanted those eight embryos to begin with.
eaglescout1998 on February 7, 2009 at 5:44 AM
You know, 14 Cabbage Patch Kids would have been a lot less expensive.
fusionaddict on February 7, 2009 at 6:37 AM
She only holds these poor babies for 45 minutes out of the day. Babies need held…and rocked. No way she can give them that…and she says she loves these babies. What a selfish love.
becki51758 on February 7, 2009 at 6:51 AM
Read an article about this lady on aol yesterday. It said that she testified in her worker’s comp hearing that her injuries (she had a desk thrown at her during the riot) made it impossible for her to care for her child (this was when she only had one, apparently). The state of California needs to be investigating more than just the clinic that did the 6-embryo implantation, IMO. They also should be investigating why a woman who claimed she was too seriously injured to care for one child was somehow able to have 13 more.
The article also said that the woman had been married for 12 years. She divorced after the riot injury, and said that her divorce was partly due to those injuries. (She said it made her depressed and difficult to be around, and she wanted her husband to move on with his life). So I doubt she’s a virgin, as someone suggested above.
Also saw an ob/gyn on a cable show estimating that the cost of birthing and after-care in ICU for the 8 infants would be over $3 million.
AZCoyote on February 7, 2009 at 7:14 AM
Comment pages: 1 2 Next »