<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Discredited Lancet study gets even more discredited</title>
	<atom:link href="http://hotair.com/archives/2009/02/05/discredited-lancet-study-gets-even-more-discredited/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/02/05/discredited-lancet-study-gets-even-more-discredited/</link>
	<description>The world’s first, full-service conservative Internet broadcast network</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2012 12:08:11 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Global Warming Hoax Enabler: The Lancet &#171; Gathering of Eagles: NY</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/02/05/discredited-lancet-study-gets-even-more-discredited/comment-page-2/#comment-2991861</link>
		<dc:creator>Global Warming Hoax Enabler: The Lancet &#171; Gathering of Eagles: NY</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Nov 2009 16:54:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=43018#comment-2991861</guid>
		<description>[...] The last time was when it developed and published a fake survey of Iraq war deaths at the behest of George Soros.  That survey was proven to be wildly in error. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] The last time was when it developed and published a fake survey of Iraq war deaths at the behest of George Soros.  That survey was proven to be wildly in error. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Six Meat Buffet &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Immigration Litigation Intimidation</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/02/05/discredited-lancet-study-gets-even-more-discredited/comment-page-2/#comment-2600178</link>
		<dc:creator>Six Meat Buffet &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Immigration Litigation Intimidation</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Aug 2009 00:59:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=43018#comment-2600178</guid>
		<description>[...] an exact number but having hard data has never stopped hard headed liberals before. Just ask a discredited Lancet study that every liberal sings by [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] an exact number but having hard data has never stopped hard headed liberals before. Just ask a discredited Lancet study that every liberal sings by [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joe Biden is Still a Fabulist — But As For Me</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/02/05/discredited-lancet-study-gets-even-more-discredited/comment-page-2/#comment-1923873</link>
		<dc:creator>Joe Biden is Still a Fabulist — But As For Me</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Feb 2009 20:20:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=43018#comment-1923873</guid>
		<description>[...] Democratic penchant for wildly exaggerating death tolls and other dire statistics in order to score political points. After all, it isn&#8217;t as though Louisiana is really losing 300 jobs a day and Biden just [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Democratic penchant for wildly exaggerating death tolls and other dire statistics in order to score political points. After all, it isn&#8217;t as though Louisiana is really losing 300 jobs a day and Biden just [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joe Biden is Still a Fabulist - Leon_H_Wolf&#8217;s blog - RedState</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/02/05/discredited-lancet-study-gets-even-more-discredited/comment-page-2/#comment-1923577</link>
		<dc:creator>Joe Biden is Still a Fabulist - Leon_H_Wolf&#8217;s blog - RedState</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Feb 2009 19:34:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=43018#comment-1923577</guid>
		<description>[...] Democratic penchant for wildly exaggerating death tolls and other dire statistics in order to score political points. After all, it isn&#8217;t as though Louisiana is really losing 300 jobs a day and Biden just [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Democratic penchant for wildly exaggerating death tolls and other dire statistics in order to score political points. After all, it isn&#8217;t as though Louisiana is really losing 300 jobs a day and Biden just [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: FamilyGreenberg.Com - Rewriting the Bush Legacy? Already???</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/02/05/discredited-lancet-study-gets-even-more-discredited/comment-page-2/#comment-1858821</link>
		<dc:creator>FamilyGreenberg.Com - Rewriting the Bush Legacy? Already???</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Feb 2009 15:51:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=43018#comment-1858821</guid>
		<description>[...] I read that the 2006 Lancet Study, which estimated Iraqi civilian deaths at more than 2% of Iraq’s pre-war population (around [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] I read that the 2006 Lancet Study, which estimated Iraqi civilian deaths at more than 2% of Iraq’s pre-war population (around [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hot Air &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Another Lancet embarrassment: Vaccine-scare doctor faked data</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/02/05/discredited-lancet-study-gets-even-more-discredited/comment-page-2/#comment-1858519</link>
		<dc:creator>Hot Air &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Another Lancet embarrassment: Vaccine-scare doctor faked data</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Feb 2009 13:41:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=43018#comment-1858519</guid>
		<description>[...] Lancet just took another high-profile hit over its study estimating Iraqi civilian deaths during the war, in which its author refused to [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Lancet just took another high-profile hit over its study estimating Iraqi civilian deaths during the war, in which its author refused to [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brutally Honest</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/02/05/discredited-lancet-study-gets-even-more-discredited/comment-page-2/#comment-1856234</link>
		<dc:creator>Brutally Honest</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Feb 2009 16:04:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=43018#comment-1856234</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Lancet study of Iraqi deaths now thoroughly rebuked...&lt;/strong&gt;

A little more than a year ago, I wrote about the Lancet study and the purposeful and intentional use of it by Religious Leftists to pass on a lie. I continue to believe that it speaks volumes to their character......</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Lancet study of Iraqi deaths now thoroughly rebuked&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>A little more than a year ago, I wrote about the Lancet study and the purposeful and intentional use of it by Religious Leftists to pass on a lie. I continue to believe that it speaks volumes to their character&#8230;&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: RD</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/02/05/discredited-lancet-study-gets-even-more-discredited/comment-page-2/#comment-1855766</link>
		<dc:creator>RD</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Feb 2009 05:43:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=43018#comment-1855766</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;Sorry I can’t help you, but I’m not in the rough &lt;strong&gt;casualty&lt;/strong&gt; estimation business. I leave statistical analysis &lt;strong&gt;of conflict-related and other demographic data&lt;/strong&gt; to professionals... 

RD on February 7, 2009 at 12:34 AM&lt;/blockquote&gt;

There, fixed it.  From time to time I will estimate things roughly, such as how many loads of firewood will fit into the bed of a truck, or how many shots of liquor are still left in the bottle.

Stuff that, incidentally, leftists can&#039;t use to skew international public opinion.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Sorry I can’t help you, but I’m not in the rough <strong>casualty</strong> estimation business. I leave statistical analysis <strong>of conflict-related and other demographic data</strong> to professionals&#8230; </p>
<p>RD on February 7, 2009 at 12:34 AM</p></blockquote>
<p>There, fixed it.  From time to time I will estimate things roughly, such as how many loads of firewood will fit into the bed of a truck, or how many shots of liquor are still left in the bottle.</p>
<p>Stuff that, incidentally, leftists can&#8217;t use to skew international public opinion.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: RD</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/02/05/discredited-lancet-study-gets-even-more-discredited/comment-page-2/#comment-1855757</link>
		<dc:creator>RD</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Feb 2009 05:37:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=43018#comment-1855757</guid>
		<description>Won&#039;t publish his methodology, huh?  Sounds &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.coyoteblog.com/coyote_blog/2007/08/letter-to-newsw.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;just like Hansen&lt;/a&gt;.  Guess they graduated from the same school of ethics.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Won&#8217;t publish his methodology, huh?  Sounds <a href="http://www.coyoteblog.com/coyote_blog/2007/08/letter-to-newsw.html" rel="nofollow">just like Hansen</a>.  Guess they graduated from the same school of ethics.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: RD</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/02/05/discredited-lancet-study-gets-even-more-discredited/comment-page-2/#comment-1855754</link>
		<dc:creator>RD</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Feb 2009 05:34:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=43018#comment-1855754</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;Just out of curiosity, what do you guys reckon is the correct number? ... I realize there are no exact figures, but what’s your rough estimate?

factoid on February 5, 2009 at 4:57 PM&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Sorry I can&#039;t help you, but I&#039;m not in the rough estimation business.  I leave statistical analysis to professionals with a commitment to transparency and who adhere to rigorous scientific and ethical standards.

The kind of thinking you espouse is what gets us into messes like this in the first place.  Don&#039;t you agree?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Just out of curiosity, what do you guys reckon is the correct number? &#8230; I realize there are no exact figures, but what’s your rough estimate?</p>
<p>factoid on February 5, 2009 at 4:57 PM</p></blockquote>
<p>Sorry I can&#8217;t help you, but I&#8217;m not in the rough estimation business.  I leave statistical analysis to professionals with a commitment to transparency and who adhere to rigorous scientific and ethical standards.</p>
<p>The kind of thinking you espouse is what gets us into messes like this in the first place.  Don&#8217;t you agree?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: small dead animals</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/02/05/discredited-lancet-study-gets-even-more-discredited/comment-page-1/#comment-1853516</link>
		<dc:creator>small dead animals</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Feb 2009 20:41:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=43018#comment-1853516</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Now They Notice...&lt;/strong&gt;

Fox News; The Executive Council of the American Association for Public Opinion Research said Dr. Gilbert Burnham, a Johns Hopkins University professor, had repeatedly refused to cooperate with an eight-month investigation into his research on the Iraqi...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Now They Notice&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>Fox News; The Executive Council of the American Association for Public Opinion Research said Dr. Gilbert Burnham, a Johns Hopkins University professor, had repeatedly refused to cooperate with an eight-month investigation into his research on the Iraqi&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: pussum207</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/02/05/discredited-lancet-study-gets-even-more-discredited/comment-page-1/#comment-1852167</link>
		<dc:creator>pussum207</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Feb 2009 15:25:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=43018#comment-1852167</guid>
		<description>I have to say that the notion of &quot;excess deaths&quot; in any war is itself beyond stupid, in any case.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have to say that the notion of &#8220;excess deaths&#8221; in any war is itself beyond stupid, in any case.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mags</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/02/05/discredited-lancet-study-gets-even-more-discredited/comment-page-1/#comment-1852101</link>
		<dc:creator>mags</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Feb 2009 15:00:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=43018#comment-1852101</guid>
		<description>Tomblvd on February 5, 2009 at 4:18 P
&#039;I’m glad we cleared that up. It’s always nice to admit you were wrong.&#039;

So you give weapons to a leader to use on his own citizens and others,watch him use them.
Then use it as a reason to invade causing millions of deaths and displacement.
You know these are not the weapons were talking about.The charge was that during sanctions and bombings Iraq managed to get weapons of mass destruction.

I will concede that yes he did have a weapon. The Euro.
Saddam changed from the petro dollar to the Euro for oil trading-he made more money.
After the invasion that was one of the first things changed back. Even though it made little sense.The Iraqi people lost 15% profit,this money was to rebuild.

Iran has changed it&#039;s trading currency to Euro/Yen other non-dollar currencies.


   &#039;No, Saddam, as you already admitted, was doing all the  killing, at a much greater rate, than after the invasion.&#039;


Saddam was toppled in 2003.You really believe that the post war planning had no consequences to events on the ground?
Was Alqaeda there in force before?

If you want to be judged on the same level as Saddam-he&#039;s done worse approach -then so be it.

The Iraqi people deserve to have it recognised what actually turned their country into a bloodbath during their &#039;liberation&#039;.

They should of had there death toll counted and recognised.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Tomblvd on February 5, 2009 at 4:18 P<br />
&#8216;I’m glad we cleared that up. It’s always nice to admit you were wrong.&#8217;</p>
<p>So you give weapons to a leader to use on his own citizens and others,watch him use them.<br />
Then use it as a reason to invade causing millions of deaths and displacement.<br />
You know these are not the weapons were talking about.The charge was that during sanctions and bombings Iraq managed to get weapons of mass destruction.</p>
<p>I will concede that yes he did have a weapon. The Euro.<br />
Saddam changed from the petro dollar to the Euro for oil trading-he made more money.<br />
After the invasion that was one of the first things changed back. Even though it made little sense.The Iraqi people lost 15% profit,this money was to rebuild.</p>
<p>Iran has changed it&#8217;s trading currency to Euro/Yen other non-dollar currencies.</p>
<p>   &#8216;No, Saddam, as you already admitted, was doing all the  killing, at a much greater rate, than after the invasion.&#8217;</p>
<p>Saddam was toppled in 2003.You really believe that the post war planning had no consequences to events on the ground?<br />
Was Alqaeda there in force before?</p>
<p>If you want to be judged on the same level as Saddam-he&#8217;s done worse approach -then so be it.</p>
<p>The Iraqi people deserve to have it recognised what actually turned their country into a bloodbath during their &#8216;liberation&#8217;.</p>
<p>They should of had there death toll counted and recognised.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DannoJyd</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/02/05/discredited-lancet-study-gets-even-more-discredited/comment-page-1/#comment-1851494</link>
		<dc:creator>DannoJyd</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Feb 2009 04:40:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=43018#comment-1851494</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;Now a research association has publicly rebuked Gilbert Burnham for not disclosing his methodology, and &lt;em&gt;Burnham may face action from his employer, Johns Hopkins:&lt;/em&gt; ...&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Never gonna happen.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Now a research association has publicly rebuked Gilbert Burnham for not disclosing his methodology, and <em>Burnham may face action from his employer, Johns Hopkins:</em> &#8230;</p></blockquote>
<p>Never gonna happen.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Obama: Drop AlQaeda charges &#38; stop drilling Utah &#124; The Anchoress</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/02/05/discredited-lancet-study-gets-even-more-discredited/comment-page-1/#comment-1851157</link>
		<dc:creator>Obama: Drop AlQaeda charges &#38; stop drilling Utah &#124; The Anchoress</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Feb 2009 02:32:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=43018#comment-1851157</guid>
		<description>[...] Unthuthers, even those given full credit by sympathetic media are still not telling the truth. Tax Cheats are still being offered up for positions of leadership [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Unthuthers, even those given full credit by sympathetic media are still not telling the truth. Tax Cheats are still being offered up for positions of leadership [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brian Mallard</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/02/05/discredited-lancet-study-gets-even-more-discredited/comment-page-1/#comment-1850719</link>
		<dc:creator>Brian Mallard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Feb 2009 00:45:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=43018#comment-1850719</guid>
		<description>Yeah, but it worked. Tell a lie and a few people will be sucked in. Tell a whopper and the whole world nods in agreement.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah, but it worked. Tell a lie and a few people will be sucked in. Tell a whopper and the whole world nods in agreement.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lancet Study Discredits Soros - Again. &#124; Political Vindication</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/02/05/discredited-lancet-study-gets-even-more-discredited/comment-page-1/#comment-1850582</link>
		<dc:creator>Lancet Study Discredits Soros - Again. &#124; Political Vindication</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Feb 2009 00:05:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=43018#comment-1850582</guid>
		<description>[...] Hot Air has a post up about the dishonest 2006 study by the the British medical journal Lancet concerning Iraqi civlian deaths during the war there (yes, it&#8217;s the one your liberal friends keep parroting).  In a rare display of outrage, the author of the study Gilbert Burnham has been publicly rebuked by the American Association for Public Opinion Research for violating its code of professional ethics by refusing to disclose the details behind the claims that 654,965 &#8220;excess&#8221; Iraqis died because America invaded Iraq. Both Iraq casualty studies were widely debated at the time of their release, shortly before U.S. elections. The 2004 report was released Oct. 29, just before that year&#8217;s presidential election; an Associated Press report at the time said the lead author, Les Roberts, had described himself as anti-war and said he&#8217;d insisted the study be released in advance of the election to prompt debate on the subject. The 2006 lead author, Burnham, said he had no political motivations: &#8220;We do this from science.&#8221; [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Hot Air has a post up about the dishonest 2006 study by the the British medical journal Lancet concerning Iraqi civlian deaths during the war there (yes, it&#8217;s the one your liberal friends keep parroting).  In a rare display of outrage, the author of the study Gilbert Burnham has been publicly rebuked by the American Association for Public Opinion Research for violating its code of professional ethics by refusing to disclose the details behind the claims that 654,965 &#8220;excess&#8221; Iraqis died because America invaded Iraq. Both Iraq casualty studies were widely debated at the time of their release, shortly before U.S. elections. The 2004 report was released Oct. 29, just before that year&#8217;s presidential election; an Associated Press report at the time said the lead author, Les Roberts, had described himself as anti-war and said he&#8217;d insisted the study be released in advance of the election to prompt debate on the subject. The 2006 lead author, Burnham, said he had no political motivations: &#8220;We do this from science.&#8221; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Instapundit &#187; Blog Archive &#187; DISCREDITED LANCET STUDY gets even more discredited. &#8220;The British medical journal Lancet published &#8230;</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/02/05/discredited-lancet-study-gets-even-more-discredited/comment-page-1/#comment-1850312</link>
		<dc:creator>Instapundit &#187; Blog Archive &#187; DISCREDITED LANCET STUDY gets even more discredited. &#8220;The British medical journal Lancet published &#8230;</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Feb 2009 23:06:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=43018#comment-1850312</guid>
		<description>[...] LANCET STUDY gets even more discredited. &#8220;The British medical journal Lancet published a study of civilian casualties in 2006 that [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] LANCET STUDY gets even more discredited. &#8220;The British medical journal Lancet published a study of civilian casualties in 2006 that [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: RightWinged</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/02/05/discredited-lancet-study-gets-even-more-discredited/comment-page-1/#comment-1850101</link>
		<dc:creator>RightWinged</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Feb 2009 22:24:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=43018#comment-1850101</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;His contribution of less than $100,000 to Burnham’s efforts were chump change, and bought him the propaganda he needed.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

So true, and some of us in this little bubble here might forget that millions of Americans bought in to the &quot;600k&quot; dead nonsense, and we&#039;ve heard countless celebrities and pundits repeat the bogus figure on TV for years.  This widely discredited &quot;study&quot; has been one of the most effective  pieces of propaganda we&#039;ve seen.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>His contribution of less than $100,000 to Burnham’s efforts were chump change, and bought him the propaganda he needed.</p></blockquote>
<p>So true, and some of us in this little bubble here might forget that millions of Americans bought in to the &#8220;600k&#8221; dead nonsense, and we&#8217;ve heard countless celebrities and pundits repeat the bogus figure on TV for years.  This widely discredited &#8220;study&#8221; has been one of the most effective  pieces of propaganda we&#8217;ve seen.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: PA Cat</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/02/05/discredited-lancet-study-gets-even-more-discredited/comment-page-1/#comment-1850001</link>
		<dc:creator>PA Cat</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Feb 2009 22:05:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=43018#comment-1850001</guid>
		<description>We&#039;re lucky Burnham&#039;s field isn&#039;t anthrax research.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We&#8217;re lucky Burnham&#8217;s field isn&#8217;t anthrax research.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: factoid</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/02/05/discredited-lancet-study-gets-even-more-discredited/comment-page-1/#comment-1849961</link>
		<dc:creator>factoid</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Feb 2009 21:57:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=43018#comment-1849961</guid>
		<description>Just out of curiosity, what do you guys reckon is the correct number? How many non-combatant Iraqi civilians died a violent death since 2003? I realize there are no exact figures, but what&#039;s your rough estimate?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just out of curiosity, what do you guys reckon is the correct number? How many non-combatant Iraqi civilians died a violent death since 2003? I realize there are no exact figures, but what&#8217;s your rough estimate?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tomblvd</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/02/05/discredited-lancet-study-gets-even-more-discredited/comment-page-1/#comment-1849725</link>
		<dc:creator>Tomblvd</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Feb 2009 21:18:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=43018#comment-1849725</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;Yes there was. America had the receipt’s.
Saddam used it to gas the kurds and chemical weapons for Iraq to use on Iranian civilians.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

I&#039;m glad we cleared that up. It&#039;s always nice to admit you were wrong.

&lt;blockquote&gt;As an occupying force,you had responibility for security.
They were not killing each other like that prior to the invasion&lt;/blockquote&gt;

No, Saddam, as you already admitted, was doing all the killing, at a much greater rate, than after the invasion.


An admission of error AND a self-refuting post all in one! Great work mags.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Yes there was. America had the receipt’s.<br />
Saddam used it to gas the kurds and chemical weapons for Iraq to use on Iranian civilians.</p></blockquote>
<p>I&#8217;m glad we cleared that up. It&#8217;s always nice to admit you were wrong.</p>
<blockquote><p>As an occupying force,you had responibility for security.<br />
They were not killing each other like that prior to the invasion</p></blockquote>
<p>No, Saddam, as you already admitted, was doing all the killing, at a much greater rate, than after the invasion.</p>
<p>An admission of error AND a self-refuting post all in one! Great work mags.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jcila</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/02/05/discredited-lancet-study-gets-even-more-discredited/comment-page-1/#comment-1849719</link>
		<dc:creator>jcila</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Feb 2009 21:16:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=43018#comment-1849719</guid>
		<description>Now remember those numbers..
Were estimated post war killings of iraqis in firefights with us troops..

but notice it never seperates ohh

All of the insurgant groups from the innocent iraqis

Also those numbers do not reflect the 
ten thousand murdered by muslim terrorists 
who mass butchered iraqi civilians..

so our soldiers did everything RIGHT..

I do wish one set of numbers was released..

the number of civilians who would have lived
IF the liberal news media
WASNT HELPING the Islamic terrorists..

I would bet you that number woul dhave been VERY high..

Liberals traitors with a new name
Democrats..</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Now remember those numbers..<br />
Were estimated post war killings of iraqis in firefights with us troops..</p>
<p>but notice it never seperates ohh</p>
<p>All of the insurgant groups from the innocent iraqis</p>
<p>Also those numbers do not reflect the<br />
ten thousand murdered by muslim terrorists<br />
who mass butchered iraqi civilians..</p>
<p>so our soldiers did everything RIGHT..</p>
<p>I do wish one set of numbers was released..</p>
<p>the number of civilians who would have lived<br />
IF the liberal news media<br />
WASNT HELPING the Islamic terrorists..</p>
<p>I would bet you that number woul dhave been VERY high..</p>
<p>Liberals traitors with a new name<br />
Democrats..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jcila</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/02/05/discredited-lancet-study-gets-even-more-discredited/comment-page-1/#comment-1849701</link>
		<dc:creator>jcila</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Feb 2009 21:14:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=43018#comment-1849701</guid>
		<description>It was Bull crap and everyone knew it..
I had idiots here screaming bush killed over half a million

And when i produced actual numbers published by both the us military and the iraqi morges (9,900) estimated at that time.

The leftists said (oh thats all made up) its all a conspiracy
yea BY the DEMOCRATS..

Morons..
I hope they throw this idiot in jail for FRAUD..</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It was Bull crap and everyone knew it..<br />
I had idiots here screaming bush killed over half a million</p>
<p>And when i produced actual numbers published by both the us military and the iraqi morges (9,900) estimated at that time.</p>
<p>The leftists said (oh thats all made up) its all a conspiracy<br />
yea BY the DEMOCRATS..</p>
<p>Morons..<br />
I hope they throw this idiot in jail for FRAUD..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bent Notes &#187; Blog Archive &#187; It was nowhere near that many civilian casualties</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/02/05/discredited-lancet-study-gets-even-more-discredited/comment-page-1/#comment-1849573</link>
		<dc:creator>Bent Notes &#187; Blog Archive &#187; It was nowhere near that many civilian casualties</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Feb 2009 20:52:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=43018#comment-1849573</guid>
		<description>[...] The very public spanking of Gilbert Burnham, chief author of that Lancet study on Iraqi deaths.  [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] The very public spanking of Gilbert Burnham, chief author of that Lancet study on Iraqi deaths.  [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
