Has Obama gone to war with Nancy Pelosi?
posted at 11:30 am on February 4, 2009 by Ed Morrissey
Did Barack Obama encourage Blue Dog Democrats to abandon the stimulus bill in the House? That’s the claim of Tennessee Democrat Jim Cooper, who told Liberadio Sunday that Obama encouraged him to vote against the bill. Cooper says that Obama knows it’s a “messy bill”, and wants a purer stimulus package. Cooper also says that Democratic leadership has treated its members like “mushrooms”, a reference to a pungent joke:
The joke Cooper references says that people should treat a particular group of people — I’ve heard reporters and management among them — like mushrooms: feed them BS and keep them in the dark. Cooper accuses Pelosi and his party’s leadership of doing just that in this interview. At one point, he says that Pelosi and her clique “live in fear” that their members will actually start reading the bills Pelosi & Co shove down their throats.
But that’s not the big news in this interview. Some have speculated that Barack Obama would have to go to war with Nancy Pelosi if he really wanted to push for bipartisanship on Capitol Hill. The stimulus package was the first and most critical piece of Obama’s domestic agenda, and Pelosi not only blocked Republicans from negotiating its terms, she filled it with non-stimulus spending that turned it into an omnibus appropriation bill, full of objectionable projects and embarrassing components, like contraceptive spending.
Small wonder that Obama might have taken offense to Pelosi’s ham-handed tactics and decided to respond in kind. If Cooper’s on the level, and I’m not sure why he’d lie about this, Obama might become a factor in a growing rebellion against the imperious Speaker and could help push her out – if enough Democratic House members get tired of the mushroom treatment.
Update: Kleinheider has the inevitable Cooper walkback:
At no point did any member of President Obama’s staff encourage me to vote against the House economic recovery bill. I told them I believed that the bill had too much long-term spending and didn’t meet the president’s goal of getting 75% of the money into the economy within 18 months. After the conversation, I felt encouraged that the administration understood those concerns and shared my longstanding commitment to fiscal responsibility.
Well, read again what he actually told Liberadio and see how the two statements can be reconciled. They can’t. Translation: the White House told him to “clarify”.









Blowback
Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.
Trackbacks/Pings
Trackback URL
Comments
Comment pages: « Previous 1 2
He’ll gird his loins.
Steve Z on February 4, 2009 at 4:40 PM
More for enersto:
Here’s a quote from the latest news about the stock market tanking today from the headliner article on Drudge:
“Consumer spending is the lion’s share of the economy,” said Anthony Conroy, head trader for BNY ConvergEx in New York. “When consumers stop spending, the economy comes to a halt.”
Jenfidel on February 4, 2009 at 5:11 PM
Very well put.
mikeyboss on February 4, 2009 at 5:19 PM
Sheer embarrassment? Spread the blame? Looking for a good scapegoat?
tom on February 4, 2009 at 5:42 PM
Then again, maybe Obama actually told him this because he’s a typical politician who lies whenever it suits his purpose.
tom on February 4, 2009 at 6:21 PM
“Has Obama gone to war with Nancy Pelosi?”
“Did Barack Obama encourage Blue Dog Democrats to abandon the stimulus bill in the House?”
Answers, not questions, please. Thanks in advance!
Kevin M on February 4, 2009 at 6:39 PM
Sooo… if Obama actually does block the stimulus (in its present form) are we going to give him credit for it?
JackOfClubs on February 4, 2009 at 7:42 PM
Comment pages: « Previous 1 2