The list of lobbyists in the Obama administration

posted at 1:30 pm on February 3, 2009 by Ed Morrissey

The Times of India claimed that Barack Obama had appointed seventeen lobbyists to high government positions in the first 14 days of his administration.  Politico provided a list of twelve of these last week, a handy reference with which we can start building our lists of “exceptions” to the Obama Administration Ethics Policy:

Here are former lobbyists Obama has tapped for top jobs:

  • Eric Holder, attorney general nominee, was registered to lobby until 2004 on behalf of clients including Global Crossing, a bankrupt telecommunications firm [now confirmed].
  • Tom Vilsack, secretary of agriculture nominee, was registered to lobby as recently as last year on behalf of the National Education Association.
  • William Lynn, deputy defense secretary nominee, was registered to lobby as recently as last year for defense contractor Raytheon, where he was a top executive.
  • William Corr, deputy health and human services secretary nominee, was registered to lobby until last year for the Campaign for Tobacco-Free Kids, a non-profit that pushes to limit tobacco use.
  • David Hayes, deputy interior secretary nominee, was registered to lobby until 2006 for clients, including the regional utility San Diego Gas & Electric.
  • Mark Patterson, chief of staff to Treasury Secretary Timothy Geithner, was registered to lobby as recently as last year for financial giant Goldman Sachs.
  • Ron Klain, chief of staff to Vice President Joe Biden, was registered to lobby until 2005 for clients, including the Coalition for Asbestos Resolution, U.S. Airways, Airborne Express and drug-maker ImClone.
  • Mona Sutphen, deputy White House chief of staff, was registered to lobby for clients, including Angliss International in 2003.
  • Melody Barnes, domestic policy council director, lobbied in 2003 and 2004 for liberal advocacy groups, including the American Civil Liberties Union, the Leadership Conference on Civil Rights, the American Constitution Society and the Center for Reproductive Rights.
  • Cecilia Munoz, White House director of intergovernmental affairs, was a lobbyist as recently as last year for the National Council of La Raza, a Hispanic advocacy group.
  • Patrick Gaspard, White House political affairs director, was a lobbyist for the Service Employees International Union.
  • Michael Strautmanis, chief of staff to the president’s assistant for intergovernmental relations, lobbied for the American Association of Justice from 2001 until 2005.

This doesn’t count Tom Daschle, who never registered as a lobbyist but got paid millions for his political connections in pursuit of preferential treatment for his clients in the health-care industry.  The AP notes this in today’s look at the Lobbyist Administration:

Sloan and others said embarrassments over Daschle, one of several top Obama appointees with a history of influencing government for clients, should not detract from the president’s first-day vow to sharply limit the role of lobbyists in his administration.

Daschle, a former senator tapped to head Health and Human Services, is not technically a lobbyist. But he was paid more than $5.2 million over the past two years as he advised health insurers and hospitals and worked in other industries such as energy and telecommunications.

Fred Wertheimer of Democracy21 is one of Washington’s best-known advocates of more open and honest government. He called Obama’s executive order “unprecedented and almost revolutionary in nature” and “a direct attack on the culture of Washington and the way business is done here.”

“A few waivers will not undermine it,” he said, provided they are justified and limited.

Limited?  It’s been less than two weeks since Obama took office, and he’s appointed a lobbyist a day to a government position.  What kind of governing philosophy is that, if not a big “For Sale” sign on the White House, at least according to Obama’s own anti-lobbyist rhetoric on the campaign trail?  A lobbyist a day helps keeps accountability away.

Wertheimer demonstrates all that is wrong with these ersatz watchdog groups who really only are interested in partisan outcomes.  Can anyone seriously believe that Wertheimer would have had the same orgasmic reaction if George Bush had written that ethics policy and spent every day afterwards violating it?  Does he really expect anyone to believe that words matter more than action?

Well, the media might buy it, gauging by their coverage of this issue, but perhaps not for long.  If the AP has started to point it out, even this mildly, others may soon follow.

Blowback

Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.

Trackbacks/Pings

Trackback URL

Comments

Comment pages: 1 2

What’s a little lobbying amongst friends?

bloggless on February 3, 2009 at 1:32 PM

Am I mistaken, or has Barry yet to follow his own policy?

Vashta.Nerada on February 3, 2009 at 1:33 PM

The Times of India claimed…

NY Times outsourcing it’s job?

JiangxiDad on February 3, 2009 at 1:34 PM

JiangxiDad on February 3, 2009 at 1:34 PM

Times of India is just doing jobs that the NY Times refuses to. You know, like report on things.

lorien1973 on February 3, 2009 at 1:34 PM

“Don’t pay any attention to that man behind the curtain!”

OhEssYouCowboys on February 3, 2009 at 1:35 PM

The bottom is out of the tub.

carbon_footprint on February 3, 2009 at 1:36 PM

But at least he’s keeping the “Israel Lobby” out of his administration.

Attila (Pillage Idiot) on February 3, 2009 at 1:37 PM

And so it begins…

I (hate) Obama!

Califemme on February 3, 2009 at 1:37 PM

I (heart) Palin…

hurry up 2012!

Califemme on February 3, 2009 at 1:37 PM

I only count 12 here – I saw another number the other day of 17. Ed, can you update this with more as they are identified?

Ron

ElRonaldo on February 3, 2009 at 1:38 PM

Shocking.

Meanwhile Human Rights Watch adjusts its opinion on rendition to say that under certain circumstances it’s not so bad.

If the fraud of the media, the screaming liberal advocacy groups and Ogabe himself haven’t yet permeated your skull, you may need to get it trepanned.

The four year Presidential comedy routine has begun. Everyone start laughing.

Bishop on February 3, 2009 at 1:39 PM

How does this list compare to the old Bush Administration? Does Obama have more lobbyist then he did?

JeffinSac on February 3, 2009 at 1:42 PM

and after they crucified Romney for having one unpaid advisor that was a lobbyist?
this is disgusting……..

Drunk Report on February 3, 2009 at 1:42 PM

Its really much simpler than you all imagine.

Its simply the Lefts belief that rules do not matter, that the end justify the means.

They do not believe in any eternal consequence, and have prooven their ability to continue to get elected even when found with $90K in bribe money in their freezer…

Problem is that the “Silent Majority” is pretty fed up… and starting to find its voice again.

Romeo13 on February 3, 2009 at 1:43 PM

Can you imagine if Barry had the little (r) behind his name what the media outrage would be like?

grapeknutz on February 3, 2009 at 1:43 PM

“What kind of governing philosophy is that, if not a big “For Sale” sign on the White House, at least according to Obama’s own anti-lobbyist rhetoric on the campaign trail?”

Maybe in his naivete, born of inexperience, Obama was under the mistaken impression he would eliminate the lobbyist profession if he hired them all.

Dusty on February 3, 2009 at 1:45 PM

How does this list compare to the old Bush Administration? Does Obama have more lobbyist then he did?

JeffinSac on February 3, 2009 at 1:42 PM

Give Dear Leader time. It’s only been two weeks under the Lobbyist Full Employment and Full Paid Taxes Act of 2009.

rbj on February 3, 2009 at 1:46 PM

Lobbyists have corrupted both parties.

At some point, they will have to address this elephant in the room.

getalife on February 3, 2009 at 1:48 PM

How does this list compare to the old Bush Administration?

JeffinSac on February 3, 2009 at 1:42 PM

Any President’s policy on lobbyists was? Get over President Bush or any other President of the past.

Wade on February 3, 2009 at 1:49 PM

Double, triple, quadruple standard for Obama, et. al.

petunia on February 3, 2009 at 1:49 PM

The Obama administration…
The most honest administration in history.
The most forthright administration in history.
The most ethical administration in history.
The…administration in history.

whitetop on February 3, 2009 at 1:49 PM

If the AP has started to point it out, even this mildly, others may soon follow.

I have my (serious) doubts.

fiscallyconservative on February 3, 2009 at 1:50 PM

There will be no lobbyists…READ MY LIPS…

right2bright on February 3, 2009 at 1:51 PM

Lobbyists have corrupted both parties.
At some point, they will have to address this elephant in the room.
getalife on February 3, 2009 at 1:48 PM

Awwww….look how bipartisan you are now, how sweet.

Bishop on February 3, 2009 at 1:52 PM

“A few waivers will not undermine it,” he said, provided they are justified and limited.

A card with this on it should be in the wallet of Obama and everyone in his administration…it comes in so handy…

Rendition? Read this card…
Warrantless wire-tapping? Read this card…
Enhanced interrogation? Read this card…
Lobbyists in the administration? Read this card…

gwelf on February 3, 2009 at 1:52 PM

Man, Gibbs is a disaster as a spokesman for the Obama.

genso on February 3, 2009 at 1:52 PM

Its really much simpler than you all imagine.

Its simply the Lefts belief that rules do not matter, that the end justify the means.

They do not believe in any eternal consequence, and have prooven their ability to continue to get elected even when found with $90K in bribe money in their freezer…

Problem is that the “Silent Majority” is pretty fed up… and starting to find its voice again.

Romeo13 on February 3, 2009 at 1:43 PM

Bingo. It explains how feminists treat Palin, how many democrats treat Republican African Americans, and how they’ll do anything they can manage to sabotage people who they feel are “harmful.”

The ends justify the means. All values are subservient to The Cause.

TheUnrepentantGeek on February 3, 2009 at 1:52 PM

I’m so glad I got on the Obama-haters’ bus early…it’s a nice view from the front seat…you can see all the ruckus from here…and the popcorn is good, too.

ladyingray on February 3, 2009 at 1:53 PM

How does this list compare to the old Bush Administration? Does Obama have more lobbyist then he did?

JeffinSac on February 3, 2009 at 1:42 PM

Bush never campaigned on “no lobbyists”…so your attempt at a comparison is moot.
It is not only lobbyists, it is that Obama promised, campaigned, gave America his word that he would not do what he is doing…in other words he lied.

right2bright on February 3, 2009 at 1:53 PM

Man, Gibbs is a disaster as a spokesman for the Obama.

genso on February 3, 2009 at 1:52 PM

Gibbs is horrible, more “uuuhss, aaand, ummmm” then Obama…plus he is way out of his element, I give him a few more weeks, then he is gone.

right2bright on February 3, 2009 at 1:54 PM

Wow!!!! Thud. Speechless. Priceless.

That should slow down the bus.

Angry Dumbo on February 3, 2009 at 1:54 PM

For some reason the media has it’s ‘nuance’ switch set to ON.

gwelf on February 3, 2009 at 1:55 PM

Gibbs is horrible, more “uuuhss, aaand, ummmm” then Obama…plus he is way out of his element, I give him a few more weeks, then he is gone.

right2bright on February 3, 2009 at 1:54 PM

I’m watching now. He’s just begging his buddies in the media to go after him. He’s not tossing them any bones at all.

genso on February 3, 2009 at 1:56 PM

I’m confused.

Obama’s a liar and not The Messiah?

*heartache*

fogw on February 3, 2009 at 1:56 PM

Man, Gibbs is a disaster as a spokesman for the Obama.

genso on February 3, 2009 at 1:52 PM

He’ll be gone soon … he’s getting flustered. He never expected to be asked any questions.

darwin on February 3, 2009 at 1:57 PM

in other words he lied.
right2bright on February 3, 2009 at 1:53 PM

Whu bup bup bup bup….easy now. They’re not lies, they’re “errors”, and errors happen to everyone, except Republicans who will always be liars. Can’t we all just get along?

Bishop on February 3, 2009 at 1:57 PM

Man, Gibbs is a disaster as a spokesman for the Obama.

genso on February 3, 2009 at 1:52 PM

Gibbs is horrible, more “uuuhss, aaand, ummmm” then Obama…plus he is way out of his element, I give him a few more weeks, then he is gone.

right2bright on February 3, 2009 at 1:54 PM

Oh, I hope not…I find his stammering quite amusing.

ladyingray on February 3, 2009 at 1:57 PM

“A few waivers will not undermine it”

More Democratic “nuance”……a new definition for ‘few’.

GarandFan on February 3, 2009 at 1:58 PM

I only count 12 here – I saw another number the other day of 17. Ed, can you update this with more as they are identified?

Ron

ElRonaldo on February 3, 2009 at 1:38 PM

Actually I think the correct statement is that Obama has requested 17 waivers…not all were appointed, like Daschle was not listed.

right2bright on February 3, 2009 at 1:58 PM

Double, triple, quadruple standard for Obama, et. al.

petunia on February 3, 2009 at 1:49 PM

Obama got standards ,and if you don’t like them… well, he have others.

the_nile on February 3, 2009 at 2:01 PM

Fred Wertheimer of Democracy21

Fred Wertheimer of Democrats21 would be more accurate.

jon1979 on February 3, 2009 at 2:01 PM

Lobbyists have corrupted both parties.

At some point, they will have to address this elephant in the room.

getalife on February 3, 2009 at 1:48 PM

And what better way than to break your own promise to the American people 17 times in 14 days!

Chuck Schick on February 3, 2009 at 2:04 PM

“Does he really expect anyone to believe that words matter more than action?”

Yes. I give you millions and millions of People Magazine reading Obama voters as evidence.

Golden Boy on February 3, 2009 at 2:06 PM

Obama got standards ,and if you don’t like them… well, he have others.
the_nile on February 3, 2009 at 2:01 PM

Similar to the way the libs view the Constitution, President Ogabe’s stanards are “living, breathing” things.

Bishop on February 3, 2009 at 2:07 PM

I know that in every campaign, politicians make promises about cleaning up Washington. And most times, you end up disappointed when it doesn’t happen. So it’s easy to become cynical – to believe that change isn’t possible; that the odds are too great; that this year is bound to be no different from the last.

But I also know what I’ve seen and what I’ve done. I know that for me, reform isn’t just the rhetoric of a campaign; it’s been a cause of my career.

http://www.barackobama.com/2007/06/22/remarks_of_senator_barack_obam_17.php

Welcome to another episode of Barack’s Bullshit.

drjohn on February 3, 2009 at 2:07 PM

Hey wait, David Axelrod was a lobbyist too, count him in!

MangoDaddy on February 3, 2009 at 2:08 PM

I’m confused.

Obama’s a liar and not The Messiah?

*heartache*

fogw on February 3, 2009 at 1:56 PM

I think the correct term is “Messliah”

drjohn on February 3, 2009 at 2:09 PM

“A few waivers will not undermine it,” he said, provided they are justified and limited.

Do as I say, not as I do.

The Democratic motto.

MarkTheGreat on February 3, 2009 at 2:14 PM

“A few waivers will not undermine it,” he said, provided they are justified and limited.

These are Democratic lobbyists. They are untainted and pure of heart.
Unlike those evil Republican lobbyists.

MarkTheGreat on February 3, 2009 at 2:16 PM

Am I mistaken, or has Barry yet to follow his own policy?

Vashta.Nerada on February 3, 2009 at 1:33 PM

We’ve always known that everything Barry says comes with an expiration date. Apparently this covers written positions as well.

MarkTheGreat on February 3, 2009 at 2:17 PM

Lobbyists have corrupted both parties.

getalife on February 3, 2009 at 1:48 PM

God forbid the people be allowed to petition their government.

MarkTheGreat on February 3, 2009 at 2:20 PM

Tom Daschle, who never registered as a lobbyist but got paid millions for his political connections in pursuit of preferential treatment for his clients in the health-care industry

Which sounds pretty close to what the First Lady was up to in her last job. No wonder this President thought that was OK.

Splunge on February 3, 2009 at 2:20 PM

Corruption from a politician from chicago?

Seriously, this administration has fumbled, and fumbled big, every single day.

jukin on February 3, 2009 at 2:23 PM

Speaking of rats and roaches, that peanut butter news story up top is a riot (unless you’ve had a bad sandwich lately, that is).

whitetop on February 3, 2009 at 2:23 PM

Hows that “Hope and Chnage” thingy working for all of ya’………?

Seven Percent Solution on February 3, 2009 at 2:24 PM

Gibbs is horrible, more “uuuhss, aaand, ummmm” then Obama…plus he is way out of his element, I give him a few more weeks, then he is gone.

right2bright on February 3, 2009 at 1:54 PM

Maybe Barry didn’t want a press secretary that more eloquent than he is.

MarkTheGreat on February 3, 2009 at 2:24 PM

Obama got standards ,and if you don’t like them… well, he have others.
the_nile on February 3, 2009 at 2:01 PM

Like the weather, if you don’t like his opinions, Obama will change them.

MarkTheGreat on February 3, 2009 at 2:27 PM

The left can’t follow rules, even ones they set.

That’s because the rules apply ever only to other people.

They make their rules for OTHER PEOPLE, see, not themselves.

Clear?

Alana on February 3, 2009 at 2:34 PM

More intellectual dishonesty from HotAir, quelle suprise.

Obama’s lobbying policy has never been “no lobbysts.” His policy was that you can not be appointed to a job in an industry/area where you lobbied for the previous two years. You also can not accept a job in that field for 4 years after you leave the administration. The idea behind the policy is to prevent people who used to fight against environmental legislation in an oil company running the EPA, for example. Which is exactly what happened under Bush, those who worked against regulations then went on to administer them. With that in mind let’s go back to that list and be honest about what’s a violation and what is not.

Legit violation of Obama Ethics rule:

# William Lynn, deputy defense secretary nominee, was registered to lobby as recently as last year for defense contractor Raytheon, where he was a top executive.

# William Corr, deputy health and human services secretary nominee, was registered to lobby until last year for the Campaign for Tobacco-Free Kids, a non-profit that pushes to limit tobacco use.

And even this is like…clearly the spirit of his lobbying work is in line with his job in the government. Remember this is an ETHICS rule. And ethically this is consistent. Had he worked for Phillip Morris, that’d be something different.

Mark Patterson, chief of staff to Treasury Secretary Timothy Geithner, was registered to lobby as recently as last year for financial giant Goldman Sachs.

#

Totally Acceptable under Obama’s Ethics rule

Tom Vilsack, secretary of agriculture nominee, was registered to lobby as recently as last year on behalf of the National Education Association.

The NEA is an Agricultural Corporation Lobby? Well that’s news to me.

David Hayes, deputy interior secretary nominee, was registered to lobby until 2006 for clients, including the regional utility San Diego Gas & Electric.

The rule is the last two years, it’s 2009 no?

Ron Klain, chief of staff to Vice President Joe Biden, was registered to lobby until 2005 for clients, including the Coalition for Asbestos Resolution, U.S. Airways, Airborne Express and drug-maker ImClone.

Again, the rule is the last TWO years.

# Mona Sutphen, deputy White House chief of staff, was registered to lobby for clients, including Angliss International in 2003.

Sight, again with the two years. Did you even bother to read your own post Ed? Or Obama’s Ethics regulation. Of course not. And I might add, this is not a policy making position.

# Melody Barnes, domestic policy council director, lobbied in 2003 and 2004 for liberal advocacy groups, including the American Civil Liberties Union, the Leadership Conference on Civil Rights, the American Constitution Society and the Center for Reproductive Rights.

Again…the rule is last. two. years. Jeez Ed shape up.
Also Melody Barnes is entirely consistent with Hopenchange messaging. Get real.

# Cecilia Munoz, White House director of intergovernmental affairs, was a lobbyist as recently as last year for the National Council of La Raza, a Hispanic advocacy group.

Uh a lobbyist for them? Or was she just part of them. You didn’t say she was “registered” anywhere didn’t you. Playing fast and loose.

Patrick Gaspard, White House political affairs director, was a lobbyist for the Service Employees International Union.

When? Dates are key. And again, he’s on the left.

Michael Strautmanis, chief of staff to the president’s assistant for intergovernmental relations, lobbied for the American Association of Justice from 2001 until 2005.

Again with the last two years part of the ethics rules. Ed your post and faux outrage is lame. There are TWO people who represent a real violation of the act of the hundreds of people appointed. This is ridiculous. Care to do a comparison of the number of lobbyists in the Bush Admin?

DeathToMediaHacks on February 3, 2009 at 2:35 PM

DeathToMediaHacks on February 3, 2009 at 2:35 PM

HAHAHAHA!!! You crack me up, you are defending hiring lobbyists?

The NEA is an Agricultural Corporation Lobby? Well that’s news to me

….well it isn’t news to the ones who register the NEA as a lobbying group.
Listen fool, if they were so “clean”…then why did Obama legally request waivers for them, because they are still listed as lobbyists…Obama listed 17 waivers, so lobbyists could bypass his rules.
So either Obama is really stupid and requested waivers he never had to…or your facts are in error.
So….are you stupid or is Obama stupid…

right2bright on February 3, 2009 at 2:42 PM

Typical neocon sniping. Everyone knows that lobbyists only work for Republicans. Community organizers work for the democrats and Obama never said he wouldn’t hire community organizers who organize Congress, did he? /sarc

eaglewingz08 on February 3, 2009 at 2:48 PM

Something smells, I just can’t quite figure out what it is yet … I wonder, did some of the crime family stick to the soles.

tarpon on February 3, 2009 at 2:51 PM

Robert Gibbs told reporters Tuesday, “The bar that we set is the highest that any administration in the country has ever set.”

Ha ha ha ha ha! That’s like saying Nancy Pelosi and Harry Reid have the “most ethical Congress ever!”

eucher on February 3, 2009 at 2:52 PM

In 2005-2007, David Hayes represented the interests of Ford Motor Company at a notorious hazardous waste site in Ringwood, New Jersey where the company had “dumped lead-based paint sludge, near homes and streams” (Greenwire, N.J. asks feds to conduct a criminal investigation of Ford, July 28 2005).

Oh look media hack, you overlooked this one…
I am sure there are more, but I don’t have time to continue to undermine your foolish attempts to deceive…

right2bright on February 3, 2009 at 2:53 PM

What’s the big deal about lobbyists in the Administration? After all, ACORN’s former (unregistered) lobbyist now sits in the Oval Office.

TXUS on February 3, 2009 at 2:53 PM

When on offense, Obama/Axelrod/Emmanual are strong and formidable. When on defense, they get shaky. GOP, STAY ON OFFENSE AND KEEP HAMMERING.

marklmail on February 3, 2009 at 2:59 PM

Barry is so far over his head in this job it’s getting scary. If he gets us safely through the next four years, ANYONE, with ANY credentials can run for president. If Barry could do it, anyone could do it.

UnEasyRider on February 3, 2009 at 3:02 PM

HAHAHAHA!!! You crack me up, you are defending hiring lobbyists?

I’m defending a specific ethics policy. Not all lobbyists are bad people and not all of them violate the spirit of the Obama Administration, except for the few I acknowledged. As for the 17 waivers sounds like it was a transparency move. Again, Gibbs is right, he IS being the most forthcoming about who is in his admin that I’ve ever seen. The haterade is a little bit silly.

DeathToMediaHacks on February 3, 2009 at 3:12 PM

Write your congressional representatives to demand tax audits of every nominee and high-level advisor in the Obama administration.

notagool on February 3, 2009 at 3:16 PM

When on offense, Obama/Axelrod/Emmanual are strong and formidable. When on defense, they get shaky. GOP, STAY ON OFFENSE AND KEEP HAMMERING.

marklmail on February 3, 2009 at 2:59 PM

Exactly. We’ve been backpedaling and apologizing since Reagan. Time to buck up.

genso on February 3, 2009 at 3:23 PM

As for the 17 waivers sounds like it was a transparency move. Again, Gibbs is right, he IS being the most forthcoming about who is in his admin that I’ve ever seen. The haterade is a little bit silly.

He’s not being forthcoming. The only reason this is coming out is because the few conservatives that are left out there are reporting it.
I’ve yet to see a nominee where The Obamessiah announces him and says “Hey, um…he was um…a lobbyist um…for _____, um…but it’s ok, because um…he’s not going to ummm….work in that area in my um….administration”

webproze on February 3, 2009 at 3:24 PM

I want to be either
a. a lobbyist (so i can lie, cheat, steal and become rich and corrupt)
b. a reporter (so i can lie, cheat, steal and become rich and corrupt)
c. a politician (so i can lie, cheat, steal and become rich and corrupt)

Sheesh the only way to make it in the liberals new usa is too lie, cheat, steal and become rich and corrupt

Not by
Honesty
hard work
dilligence
obeying the laws
doing whats right
sweat and persperation

Sheesh what a wonderful new world the liberals have given us..

sheesh everyone just line up outside obamas office
Only credentials needed is
an arrest record..

jcila on February 3, 2009 at 3:30 PM

I’m defending a specific ethics policy. Not all lobbyists are bad people and not all of them violate the spirit of the Obama Administration, except for the few I acknowledged. As for the 17 waivers sounds like it was a transparency move. Again, Gibbs is right, he IS being the most forthcoming about who is in his admin that I’ve ever seen. The haterade is a little bit silly.

DeathToMediaHacks on February 3, 2009 at 3:12 PM

No, he is required by law to issue those waivers…and the few you acknowledged was shown to be incomplete and a farce. And the lobbyists he has chosen have represented what…the banks, auto industry, investment firms, everyone who is getting a bail-out…what a coincidence!
Now we find out the stimulus has a little gift for his Hollywood friends…my God, this man is the most corruptible politician I have ever seen, he is so naive, such a novice that he is being worked over by the pros.
He had a chance, now he flushing it down…he is even talking about withdrawing from fighting AQ, after President Bush has all but eliminated them, and he is talking about retreating…read the signs, he is a rookie.

right2bright on February 3, 2009 at 4:26 PM

I’m defending a specific ethics policy. Not all lobbyists are bad people and not all of them violate the spirit of the Obama Administration, except for the few I acknowledged. As for the 17 waivers sounds like it was a transparency move. Again, Gibbs is right, he IS being the most forthcoming about who is in his admin that I’ve ever seen. The haterade is a little bit silly.

DeathToMediaHacks on February 3, 2009 at 3:12 PM

You are defending a crafty public relations ploy.

Obama ran on a “clean up Washington” platform, vowing to not hire lobbyists (He did not caveat his campaign promises with ‘waivers’ for exceptional lobbyists).

He then signs an executive order placing his policy into effect (ergo, making good on the promise by producing a tactile representation of it: the EO).

He then proceeds to “waive” his EO on, so far, a daily basis. Not to fear. He then makes good on another campaign promise of “transparency”, allowing him to claim conformance with both promises by requiring a ‘waiver’, and then being public about not following the first promise.

It’s quite a feat to praised for breaking a promise. In other words, he had no plan to not hire lobbyists. What he did was make a rule that he could violate in a way that would confirm another rule.

Man, you are completely owned by the trance-like rhythm coming from Thulsa Doom.

BobMbx on February 3, 2009 at 4:31 PM

enshala, right Barack?

DamnYankee on February 3, 2009 at 4:50 PM

NY Times outsourcing it’s job?

JiangxiDad on February 3, 2009 at 1:34 PM

Had to. They no longer have any idea how to do it.

Jaibones on February 3, 2009 at 5:33 PM

This little piggy went to treasury, this little piggy went to transportation, this little piggy went to…

Hog Wild on February 3, 2009 at 5:57 PM

So….are you stupid or is Obama stupid…

right2bright on February 3, 2009 at 2:42 PM

I’m going with c) both a and b

AZfederalist on February 3, 2009 at 10:24 PM

That’s double the seven he was crucifying McCain over a few months back.

Seven.

Piker.

Bruce in NH on February 3, 2009 at 10:41 PM

Waiver!

The rallying cry of the Obama Administration.

PattyJ on February 4, 2009 at 12:38 AM

Funny how this administration has adapted what appears to be something simiar to the Islamic practice of abrogation, where what comes later clearly supersedes any earlier practice or understanding, and is therefore preferred.

BNCurtis on February 4, 2009 at 10:41 AM

Hey, aren’t these lobbyists’ groups the same people that helped the O get elected?
What a coincidence!

PaddyJ on February 4, 2009 at 12:27 PM

Comment pages: 1 2