Chuck Todd: If anything, Obama’s vetting of Daschle was too thorough
posted at 6:08 pm on February 3, 2009 by Allahpundit
Share on Facebook | printer-friendly
Too thorough, that is, in the sense that they supposedly got bogged down in other issues and didn’t pay as much attention to taxes as they should have. Er, is that remotely plausible? Geithner paid his back taxes on November 21, the same day Obama nominated him for Treasury. From that day on, Team Barry had every reason to check and re-check the other nominees’ exposure to prevent precisely this sort of pattern from emerging and a media frenzy from erupting. Did they neglect to do that? Or did Daschle just lie to them when they asked? According to the Times, he didn’t mention his tax problem to them until late December or early January, weeks after he was nominated on December 11, despite having known about it since June.
The fact that they went ahead with Killefer’s nomination, whose tax lien was imposed four years ago, notwithstanding Geithner’s and Daschle’s snafus makes me think it’s not so much a vetting problem as a Messiah problem: They assumed the public would support The One no matter what, all the more so in a crisis environment with a deep blue Congress wielding a rubber stamp, so they gambled on pushing them all through. Only when the Geithner story took off did they realize they’d miscalculated. Oh well. Exit question via Jim Treacher: That John McCain sure did a sloppy job vetting Joe the Plumber, huh?
Visit msnbc.com for Breaking News, World News, and News about the Economy
You must be logged in to post a comment.

















Blowback
Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.
Trackbacks/Pings
Trackback URL
Comments
Comment pages: « Previous 1 2
A) Joe The Plumber had a lien, he knew about his back taxes and he was paying them back. He did not try to skirt or intentionally forget to pay them.
B) Obama’s tax policies are very relevant as they would increase our “fair share” of the burden whilst rebalancing that wealth beneath the people who did not work for it.
C) It’s amazing the double standards and hypocrisy that existing in the press. If this was how Bush started out in 2000…
D) Obama knew about Daschle’s tax problems since 1/4/2009. H is arrogant thinking that he could put him through. How much did Daschle pay Obama should be the question?
James on February 4, 2009 at 8:42 AM
Also, I might add. Obama is ultimately going to make the Clinton years look respectable in comparison. Amazing…
Obama got in way over his head, and his usual Chicago style of thuggery and placement of people in positions to “grease” the wheel so to speak is not working, even with his full court press adoration.
What will O resort too now?
James on February 4, 2009 at 8:45 AM
In the same sense that Nicole Brown Simpson’s real problem was that OJ “loved her too much.”
saint kansas on February 4, 2009 at 9:02 AM
And to think I was horrified that Hillary could actually become our President.
kelley in virginia on February 4, 2009 at 9:13 AM
Idea for PJTV feature: Joe The Plumber interviews Tom Daschle for tips on reducing this tax lien, and along the way informs us about the difference between the words “tax lien” and “tax evasion”.
drunyan8315 on February 4, 2009 at 9:55 AM
Yup…Obama did his job too good! Now that is a unique spin from an Obama butt boy! You probably need a good mouthwash after that, Chuckie!
sabbott on February 4, 2009 at 11:14 AM
I guess a do-over is out of the picture…
ladyingray on February 4, 2009 at 1:01 PM
Somehow, that 30 page Obama questionaire was not enough to sort these issues out? Well, I’m speechless. Is this part of that whole “share the wealth” thing they talked about? I got it, they left out share “of” the wealth.
HOPE = Have Opposing People Executed.
dthorny on February 4, 2009 at 7:14 PM
Comment pages: « Previous 1 2