<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Obama plans 8% increase in defense budget?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://hotair.com/archives/2009/02/02/obama-plans-8-increase-in-defense-budget/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/02/02/obama-plans-8-increase-in-defense-budget/</link>
	<description>The world’s first, full-service conservative Internet broadcast network</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2012 18:01:37 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Military Power Supplies by Abbott Technologies</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/02/02/obama-plans-8-increase-in-defense-budget/comment-page-2/#comment-2542585</link>
		<dc:creator>Military Power Supplies by Abbott Technologies</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Aug 2009 18:03:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=42651#comment-2542585</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Military Power Supplies by Abbott Technologies...&lt;/strong&gt;

Otherwise, we\&#039;re just going through the throws of settling in. Finding power converters, organizing the apartment to fit our rhythm of life, locating the various supermarkets, buying spices for the kitchen, etc....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Military Power Supplies by Abbott Technologies&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>Otherwise, we\&#8217;re just going through the throws of settling in. Finding power converters, organizing the apartment to fit our rhythm of life, locating the various supermarkets, buying spices for the kitchen, etc&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Quince d&#237;as con el Presidente: las acciones y propuestas pol&#237;ticas de Obama (y III) &#171; Sarah Palin en Español</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/02/02/obama-plans-8-increase-in-defense-budget/comment-page-2/#comment-1857739</link>
		<dc:creator>Quince d&#237;as con el Presidente: las acciones y propuestas pol&#237;ticas de Obama (y III) &#171; Sarah Palin en Español</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 Feb 2009 15:35:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=42651#comment-1857739</guid>
		<description>[...] Tres. Obama también va a ampliar en un 8% el presupuesto del Departamento de Defensa. Es el presupuesto corriente, excluyendo gastos para las guerras en curso, y está en línea con la propuesta que dejó preparada … Bush. La información es de Congressional Quarterly, que explica que es casi un 11% menos de lo que pedía el propio Departamento de Defensa, pero que supone pasar de 487.7 mil millones en el año fiscal 2009 a 527 mil millones en el años fiscal 2010. Robert Gates estima que el esfuerzo militar en Iraq y Afganistán supondrá unos 70 mil millones adicionales, que serán financiados mediante leyes ad-hoc (Gracias a Ed Morrissey en HotAir). [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Tres. Obama también va a ampliar en un 8% el presupuesto del Departamento de Defensa. Es el presupuesto corriente, excluyendo gastos para las guerras en curso, y está en línea con la propuesta que dejó preparada … Bush. La información es de Congressional Quarterly, que explica que es casi un 11% menos de lo que pedía el propio Departamento de Defensa, pero que supone pasar de 487.7 mil millones en el año fiscal 2009 a 527 mil millones en el años fiscal 2010. Robert Gates estima que el esfuerzo militar en Iraq y Afganistán supondrá unos 70 mil millones adicionales, que serán financiados mediante leyes ad-hoc (Gracias a Ed Morrissey en HotAir). [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Key Senators To Call On The Stimulus (Updated Pork List) &#171; Utah Rattler</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/02/02/obama-plans-8-increase-in-defense-budget/comment-page-2/#comment-1850338</link>
		<dc:creator>Key Senators To Call On The Stimulus (Updated Pork List) &#171; Utah Rattler</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Feb 2009 23:10:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=42651#comment-1850338</guid>
		<description>[...] is the most up-to-date pork list I can find (note: if you click the link look at this update to the headline): • $83 billion in welfare payments • $81 billion for Medicaid • $66 billion [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] is the most up-to-date pork list I can find (note: if you click the link look at this update to the headline): • $83 billion in welfare payments • $81 billion for Medicaid • $66 billion [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: F3 Coalition - [Faith. Family. Freedom.] &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Obama&#8217;s Cabinet Taxed</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/02/02/obama-plans-8-increase-in-defense-budget/comment-page-2/#comment-1843806</link>
		<dc:creator>F3 Coalition - [Faith. Family. Freedom.] &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Obama&#8217;s Cabinet Taxed</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Feb 2009 06:34:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=42651#comment-1843806</guid>
		<description>[...] Obama&#8217;s Cabinet Taxed February 4, 2009 12:34 am Adam Graham Uncategorized  Clarification: The President is not cutting defense.  (Hat Tip: Hot Air.) [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Obama&#8217;s Cabinet Taxed February 4, 2009 12:34 am Adam Graham Uncategorized  Clarification: The President is not cutting defense.  (Hat Tip: Hot Air.) [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Obama&#8217;s Cabinet Taxed - adamsweb&#8217;s blog - RedState</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/02/02/obama-plans-8-increase-in-defense-budget/comment-page-2/#comment-1843783</link>
		<dc:creator>Obama&#8217;s Cabinet Taxed - adamsweb&#8217;s blog - RedState</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Feb 2009 06:15:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=42651#comment-1843783</guid>
		<description>[...] Clarification: The President is not cutting defense.  (Hat Tip: Hot Air.) [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Clarification: The President is not cutting defense.  (Hat Tip: Hot Air.) [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Obama Taxed</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/02/02/obama-plans-8-increase-in-defense-budget/comment-page-2/#comment-1843778</link>
		<dc:creator>Obama Taxed</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Feb 2009 06:08:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=42651#comment-1843778</guid>
		<description>[...] Clarification: The President is not cutting defense.  (Hat Tip: Hot Air.) [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Clarification: The President is not cutting defense.  (Hat Tip: Hot Air.) [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anchoress&#8217; 1-2-3 Stimulus Bill &#124; The Anchoress</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/02/02/obama-plans-8-increase-in-defense-budget/comment-page-2/#comment-1842147</link>
		<dc:creator>Anchoress&#8217; 1-2-3 Stimulus Bill &#124; The Anchoress</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Feb 2009 22:03:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=42651#comment-1842147</guid>
		<description>[...] please. Just give me back my money, okay? I&#8217;d like a refund. You can keep enough to fund the military, protect the borders, feed the hungry and the elderly, keep the Schip program where it is (in other [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] please. Just give me back my money, okay? I&#8217;d like a refund. You can keep enough to fund the military, protect the borders, feed the hungry and the elderly, keep the Schip program where it is (in other [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Reverse_Vampyr » Obama to increase defense budget?</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/02/02/obama-plans-8-increase-in-defense-budget/comment-page-2/#comment-1842083</link>
		<dc:creator>Reverse_Vampyr » Obama to increase defense budget?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Feb 2009 21:41:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=42651#comment-1842083</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;President Obama to increase the defense budget?...&lt;/strong&gt;

Time will tell, of course. And I know I&#039;m probably setting myself up for disappointment by giving President Obama the benefit of the doubt, but I&#039;m sincerely hoping this will be one place where he won&#039;t make good on his campaign pledge to gut the mi...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>President Obama to increase the defense budget?&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>Time will tell, of course. And I know I&#8217;m probably setting myself up for disappointment by giving President Obama the benefit of the doubt, but I&#8217;m sincerely hoping this will be one place where he won&#8217;t make good on his campaign pledge to gut the mi&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: lexhamfox</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/02/02/obama-plans-8-increase-in-defense-budget/comment-page-2/#comment-1840994</link>
		<dc:creator>lexhamfox</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Feb 2009 17:43:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=42651#comment-1840994</guid>
		<description>&quot;Budget comparisons are not that complicated — an increase is an increase, and a cut is a cut, but an increase above the rate of inflation is never a cut, in either the Bush or the Obama administration.&quot; Ed

I don&#039;t think these matters are straight forward. There are a number of games to be played with budget numbers especially in defense budgets. Keep in mind that there is a huge amount of defense and war related spending which has been kept outside the regular budget especially since the invasion of Iraq.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Budget comparisons are not that complicated — an increase is an increase, and a cut is a cut, but an increase above the rate of inflation is never a cut, in either the Bush or the Obama administration.&#8221; Ed</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t think these matters are straight forward. There are a number of games to be played with budget numbers especially in defense budgets. Keep in mind that there is a huge amount of defense and war related spending which has been kept outside the regular budget especially since the invasion of Iraq.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Blog of Bodnar &#187; Obama Appointee Withdrawals because of&#8230;.Tax Problems</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/02/02/obama-plans-8-increase-in-defense-budget/comment-page-2/#comment-1840935</link>
		<dc:creator>Blog of Bodnar &#187; Obama Appointee Withdrawals because of&#8230;.Tax Problems</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Feb 2009 17:28:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=42651#comment-1840935</guid>
		<description>[...] stories you should check out Stimulus losing support Obama might plan an 8% increase in defense spending New York Times calls for Daschle to [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] stories you should check out Stimulus losing support Obama might plan an 8% increase in defense spending New York Times calls for Daschle to [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Democrats play to type &#171; Internet Scofflaw</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/02/02/obama-plans-8-increase-in-defense-budget/comment-page-2/#comment-1840833</link>
		<dc:creator>Democrats play to type &#171; Internet Scofflaw</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Feb 2009 17:00:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=42651#comment-1840833</guid>
		<description>[...] UPDATE: The story is not so simple, after all.  Hot Air says the &#8220;cut&#8221; is in the usual sense of Washington double-speak: a cut relative to the [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] UPDATE: The story is not so simple, after all.  Hot Air says the &#8220;cut&#8221; is in the usual sense of Washington double-speak: a cut relative to the [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: moxie_neanderthal</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/02/02/obama-plans-8-increase-in-defense-budget/comment-page-2/#comment-1840780</link>
		<dc:creator>moxie_neanderthal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Feb 2009 16:51:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=42651#comment-1840780</guid>
		<description>Whatever. Obama is on the record favoring slashes in    defense spending on all sorts of programs and reducing and sometimes eliminating R&amp;D for complete systems. In short, he&#039;ll favor a position until he doesn&#039;t. Then we&#039;ll be lectured to as to why we didn&#039;t understand what he said in the first place. 

For years the press carried the Democrat&#039;s water by proclaiming that reductions in the rates of growth for social programs were cuts. Reducing expenditure growth for some social program from twice the rate of inflation to matching the inflation rate was a slash. Oh the children, grannies and destitute families. So if the Prez gets beat by the same political cudgel, sorry. Apply ice until the swelling goes down. Probably won&#039;t leave a mark. 

But on a more serious note,Obama has limited understanding of the military and no personal experience yet he demonstrates a high degree of confidence that borders on hubris. In many way, the new Prez seems to be the embodiment of an Über Technocrat, sort of a presidential version of Robert McNamara but without the operational and systems experience. 

McNamara&#039;s confidence was born out of his education and experience at Ford Motor. He and the other &quot;whiz kids&quot; represented the notion that really smart and proficient people could solve any problem. McNamara was thrown into the Secretary of Defense job with no military experience but approached the job based on his past operational experiences. How do the various parts work, what are the outputs and metrics. 

Like McCamara, Obama has the intellectual self confidence that comes from an Ivy League education and no prior experience for the job he now holds. But unlike McNamara who could rely on his management experience with systems and operations, Obama has no previous applicable managment experience. Rather, Obama&#039;s self confidence is based on working people and the system. We&#039;ll soon see what happens when indulgent self confidence and a fawning press meets a series of intractable problems. 

I think we&#039;re starting to see some cracks in the mirror.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Whatever. Obama is on the record favoring slashes in    defense spending on all sorts of programs and reducing and sometimes eliminating R&amp;D for complete systems. In short, he&#8217;ll favor a position until he doesn&#8217;t. Then we&#8217;ll be lectured to as to why we didn&#8217;t understand what he said in the first place. </p>
<p>For years the press carried the Democrat&#8217;s water by proclaiming that reductions in the rates of growth for social programs were cuts. Reducing expenditure growth for some social program from twice the rate of inflation to matching the inflation rate was a slash. Oh the children, grannies and destitute families. So if the Prez gets beat by the same political cudgel, sorry. Apply ice until the swelling goes down. Probably won&#8217;t leave a mark. </p>
<p>But on a more serious note,Obama has limited understanding of the military and no personal experience yet he demonstrates a high degree of confidence that borders on hubris. In many way, the new Prez seems to be the embodiment of an Über Technocrat, sort of a presidential version of Robert McNamara but without the operational and systems experience. </p>
<p>McNamara&#8217;s confidence was born out of his education and experience at Ford Motor. He and the other &#8220;whiz kids&#8221; represented the notion that really smart and proficient people could solve any problem. McNamara was thrown into the Secretary of Defense job with no military experience but approached the job based on his past operational experiences. How do the various parts work, what are the outputs and metrics. </p>
<p>Like McCamara, Obama has the intellectual self confidence that comes from an Ivy League education and no prior experience for the job he now holds. But unlike McNamara who could rely on his management experience with systems and operations, Obama has no previous applicable managment experience. Rather, Obama&#8217;s self confidence is based on working people and the system. We&#8217;ll soon see what happens when indulgent self confidence and a fawning press meets a series of intractable problems. </p>
<p>I think we&#8217;re starting to see some cracks in the mirror.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ryan Gandy</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/02/02/obama-plans-8-increase-in-defense-budget/comment-page-2/#comment-1840579</link>
		<dc:creator>Ryan Gandy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Feb 2009 16:06:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=42651#comment-1840579</guid>
		<description>MarkTheGreat on February 3, 2009 at 8:27 AM

If he has surgical gloves, its okay.  I think . . .</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>MarkTheGreat on February 3, 2009 at 8:27 AM</p>
<p>If he has surgical gloves, its okay.  I think . . .</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DarkCurrent</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/02/02/obama-plans-8-increase-in-defense-budget/comment-page-2/#comment-1840463</link>
		<dc:creator>DarkCurrent</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Feb 2009 15:23:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=42651#comment-1840463</guid>
		<description>Luxurious new bath houses for every base.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Luxurious new bath houses for every base.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: el gordo</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/02/02/obama-plans-8-increase-in-defense-budget/comment-page-2/#comment-1840452</link>
		<dc:creator>el gordo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Feb 2009 15:16:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=42651#comment-1840452</guid>
		<description>It seems to me that we just don´t know at this point.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It seems to me that we just don´t know at this point.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Supporting Obama &#124; The Loudest Cricket</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/02/02/obama-plans-8-increase-in-defense-budget/comment-page-2/#comment-1840319</link>
		<dc:creator>Supporting Obama &#124; The Loudest Cricket</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Feb 2009 14:40:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=42651#comment-1840319</guid>
		<description>[...] plans to increase the defense budget by 8%.&#160; As I have mentioned before, I will support Obama&#8217;s policies [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] plans to increase the defense budget by 8%.&nbsp; As I have mentioned before, I will support Obama&#8217;s policies [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hang on a second with that report on a Defense budget cut. &#171; HoodaThunk?</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/02/02/obama-plans-8-increase-in-defense-budget/comment-page-2/#comment-1840152</link>
		<dc:creator>Hang on a second with that report on a Defense budget cut. &#171; HoodaThunk?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Feb 2009 13:40:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=42651#comment-1840152</guid>
		<description>[...] on a second with that report on a Defense budget&#160;cut. Via Ed Morrissey at Hot Air, CQ Politics is reporting that the budget submitted by the Obama administration shows a $527B limit [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] on a second with that report on a Defense budget&nbsp;cut. Via Ed Morrissey at Hot Air, CQ Politics is reporting that the budget submitted by the Obama administration shows a $527B limit [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hang on a second with that report on a Defense budget cut. &#171; HoodaThunk?</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/02/02/obama-plans-8-increase-in-defense-budget/comment-page-2/#comment-1840153</link>
		<dc:creator>Hang on a second with that report on a Defense budget cut. &#171; HoodaThunk?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Feb 2009 13:40:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=42651#comment-1840153</guid>
		<description>[...] on a second with that report on a Defense budget&#160;cut. Via Ed Morrissey at Hot Air, CQ Politics is reporting that the budget submitted by the Obama administration shows a $527B limit [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] on a second with that report on a Defense budget&nbsp;cut. Via Ed Morrissey at Hot Air, CQ Politics is reporting that the budget submitted by the Obama administration shows a $527B limit [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: marklmail</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/02/02/obama-plans-8-increase-in-defense-budget/comment-page-2/#comment-1840144</link>
		<dc:creator>marklmail</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Feb 2009 13:34:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=42651#comment-1840144</guid>
		<description>HA! The &quot;Bush lied. People died.&quot; crowd who voted for Obama will have a flipping melt-down.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>HA! The &#8220;Bush lied. People died.&#8221; crowd who voted for Obama will have a flipping melt-down.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MarkTheGreat</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/02/02/obama-plans-8-increase-in-defense-budget/comment-page-2/#comment-1840142</link>
		<dc:creator>MarkTheGreat</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Feb 2009 13:32:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=42651#comment-1840142</guid>
		<description>How much you want to bet that this 8% increase is nothing more than show?  Word has gone out to the Democrats on the hill that Obama will have no problem if they produce a budget with substantial military cuts in it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How much you want to bet that this 8% increase is nothing more than show?  Word has gone out to the Democrats on the hill that Obama will have no problem if they produce a budget with substantial military cuts in it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dreamweaver</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/02/02/obama-plans-8-increase-in-defense-budget/comment-page-2/#comment-1840138</link>
		<dc:creator>Dreamweaver</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Feb 2009 13:28:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=42651#comment-1840138</guid>
		<description>This would seem to support the Fox version.

http://www.commentarymagazine.com/blogs/index.php/boot</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This would seem to support the Fox version.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.commentarymagazine.com/blogs/index.php/boot" rel="nofollow">http://www.commentarymagazine.com/blogs/index.php/boot</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MarkTheGreat</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/02/02/obama-plans-8-increase-in-defense-budget/comment-page-2/#comment-1840135</link>
		<dc:creator>MarkTheGreat</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Feb 2009 13:27:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=42651#comment-1840135</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;Someone check Cindy Sheehan’s pulse.

fogw on February 2, 2009 at 5:00 PM&lt;/blockquote&gt;

that would require actually touching her.  Eew.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Someone check Cindy Sheehan’s pulse.</p>
<p>fogw on February 2, 2009 at 5:00 PM</p></blockquote>
<p>that would require actually touching her.  Eew.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MarkTheGreat</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/02/02/obama-plans-8-increase-in-defense-budget/comment-page-2/#comment-1840133</link>
		<dc:creator>MarkTheGreat</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Feb 2009 13:26:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=42651#comment-1840133</guid>
		<description>DeathToMediaHacks on February 2, 2009 at 5:08 PM

I see many conservatives criticizing Fox news for this.

I have never seen you criticize a liberal, regardless of how descpicable they act.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>DeathToMediaHacks on February 2, 2009 at 5:08 PM</p>
<p>I see many conservatives criticizing Fox news for this.</p>
<p>I have never seen you criticize a liberal, regardless of how descpicable they act.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SKYFOX</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/02/02/obama-plans-8-increase-in-defense-budget/comment-page-2/#comment-1840105</link>
		<dc:creator>SKYFOX</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Feb 2009 12:58:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=42651#comment-1840105</guid>
		<description>Scorched_Earth on February 3

Their first satellite was named &quot;Hope&quot;.  Any bets on the name of their second?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Scorched_Earth on February 3</p>
<p>Their first satellite was named &#8220;Hope&#8221;.  Any bets on the name of their second?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Down 10% up 8% love that fuzzy math &#171; DaTechguy&#8217;s Blog</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/02/02/obama-plans-8-increase-in-defense-budget/comment-page-1/#comment-1840099</link>
		<dc:creator>Down 10% up 8% love that fuzzy math &#171; DaTechguy&#8217;s Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Feb 2009 12:54:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=42651#comment-1840099</guid>
		<description>[...] Congressional quarterly says that instead he will be increasing defense [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Congressional quarterly says that instead he will be increasing defense [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
