Norah O’Donnell to Mike Pence: Why are you so beholden to Rush Limbaugh?
posted at 7:15 pm on January 28, 2009 by Allahpundit
A lefty friend e-mailed me this afternoon before this even aired asking why MSNBC was running so many segments today on Limbaugh being the new head of the GOP. Answer: For the same reason Obama name-checked him in that meeting with Republicans leaders last week, knowing full well that it’d leak. The more the left builds him up, the more they can tar the whole GOP with whatever controversial thing he’ll say tomorrow. Rest assured, if the stimulus tanks, the economy craters, and centrists lurch back towards the right and noninterventionism, this momentary media spotlight on him will disappear mighty quick. As for why Republican leaders are loath to criticize him, Gingrey already told us in his pathetic, groveling apology this morning: “Because of the high volume of phone calls and correspondence received by my office since the Politico article ran, I wanted to take a moment to speak directly to grassroots conservatives. Let me assure you, I am one of you.” Such is Limbaugh’s standing with the base that to criticize him, however gently, is sufficient to call one’s conservative authenticity into question. There’s only one person who trumps him in that regard, in fact, and it’s that person who’s the real de facto head of the party.
Below the O’Donnell clip you’ll find a long, entertaining exchange between Joan Walsh and Dick Armey from tonight’s Hardball on — guess what — whether Rush Limbaugh’s the head of the GOP. Click the image to watch.
Visit msnbc.com for Breaking News, World News, and News about the Economy
Blowback
Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.
Trackbacks/Pings
Trackback URL
Comments
Comment pages: 1 2 Next »
Pence to O’Donnell: Why are you so beholden to B. Hussein Obama?
Defector01 on January 28, 2009 at 7:19 PM
Obama’s the head of MSNBC.
snickelfritz on January 28, 2009 at 7:23 PM
LOL these people are morons.
Rush Limbaugh is a private citizen with a radio show.
Why he garners so much attention when he has no direct power in legislative matters nor votes on any committee, nor issues authoritative commands to anyone in the Republican Party is irrelevant; He is the head of the GOP in fantasy land.
BKennedy on January 28, 2009 at 7:24 PM
Classic media in the tank for the messiah, shameless!
grapeknutz on January 28, 2009 at 7:24 PM
Anyone heard from our de facto head in regards to this stimulus crap sandwich?
amerpundit on January 28, 2009 at 7:24 PM
MSNBC is worse than PRAVDA. A joke in every regard.
Allahpundit is right in one thing: Sarah & Rush are the leaders of this Party, and today also showed us that Obama has ZERO, ZILCH influence among conservatives in this country.
Also remember than despite the election results, more than twice as many Americans define themselves as “Conservative” versus “Liberal”.
Is it 2010/2012 yet?
Norwegian on January 28, 2009 at 7:25 PM
I don’t think so. At least not in my case. Sarah Palin has been in politics for what, less than 10 years? Rush has been the leader of conservatism for 20+ years. Sarah goes after Rush, bye bye Sarah, in my eyes.
Michael in MI on January 28, 2009 at 7:25 PM
Yeah like Congressional Republicans (ok maybe not Pence) listen to Rush
karasoth on January 28, 2009 at 7:25 PM
So is MoveOn or Kos the head of the DNC? (These people are colossal idiots.)
DaveS on January 28, 2009 at 7:26 PM
When is the last time there was a week spent on badgering the Democrats on why they were being led by George Soros/Moveon.org/CODE PINK/Daily Kos/Huffington Post? Oh yeah, never. When they pretty much *do* get their talking points and marching orders from those groups.
Michael in MI on January 28, 2009 at 7:28 PM
Damn, that’s one ugly woman!
Keemo on January 28, 2009 at 7:29 PM
The head of a movement does not necessarily have to be a politician.
Two words:
Paul Revere.
jgapinoy on January 28, 2009 at 7:30 PM
OMG, Armey is in so much trouble!!!
Cindy Munford on January 28, 2009 at 7:31 PM
Must admit though, she does have that Monica Lewinsky mouth shape thing going for herself.
Keemo on January 28, 2009 at 7:31 PM
That laugh of Matthews’ is like a dying duck’s call.
MadisonConservative on January 28, 2009 at 7:31 PM
” the more they can tar the whole GOP with whatever controversial thing he’ll say tomorrow.”
Rush is controversial? Since when is hard logic and the truth controversial? To whom?
Scotsman on January 28, 2009 at 7:32 PM
Answer: Rush gives the best cigars and liquor as Christmas Presents.
Mr. Joe on January 28, 2009 at 7:36 PM
I haven’t watched the Pence clip yet but Mr. Armey has it right, the MSM going crazy over Rush but totally ignoring that Mr. Gingrey has to answer to the folks in his district. The are dumber then a box of rocks.
Cindy Munford on January 28, 2009 at 7:37 PM
I hate to give the Moronic Slobbering Nitwit Barack Cabal credit for anything but…..
Nora is definitely the hottest news babe.
notagool on January 28, 2009 at 7:37 PM
Even the $155K cloned version of “Lancelot” could smell the fear MSNBC has for Limbaugh.
BHO Jonestown on January 28, 2009 at 7:38 PM
Why are Republicans so unwilling to unite behind socialism? Why do they have to so divisively stand up for individual liberty? Why can’t Republicans stop opposing bad ideas on their merits? Why do they complain about every little infringement of their civil liberties?
JohnJ on January 28, 2009 at 7:39 PM
They just want people in Congress to be afraid of making Keith Obermann angry. It must be kind of said that “The Worst Person in the World” award is in reality considered a badge of honor.
Cindy Munford on January 28, 2009 at 7:44 PM
I’ve said it here before. I will say it again — as a firm conservative. The GOP is little more than the modern day Whig Party.
Just dissolve and be done. There’s no message. No leadership. Diminished relevance.
At almost every turn the GOP is outmaneuvered by the Dimmicrats. Extend the permanent campaign and momentum by further making your opponent a cartoon characture. It must be like shooting fish in a barrel. And I like rush immensely. But he’s not the breadth and depth of the GOP. Nor is John McCain.
Exhibit A: Why does any self respecting conservative bother to go on to MSNBC? It makes no logical sense.
Exhibit B: Well here’s ONE reason … the GOP lacks the ability to vault over these nutroots to talk directly to the public via New Media. Let’s not point to those forgettable Web ads that are up for 20 minutes god knows where on the Internet.
The absolute vacuum is far too much for a bedrock Reaganite to stomach.
August Horch on January 28, 2009 at 7:44 PM
The media must destroy that of which they fear.
Palin
Joe the Plumber
Rush
And so on.
Conservative_SAHM on January 28, 2009 at 7:46 PM
#1. F**k Norah O’Donnell.
#2. Allah, you said, “A lefty friend e-mailed me this afternoon…”
A lefty friend? Excuse me, but the left is evil. They’re for abortion, taking your property at the point of a gun, and for surrendering America to terrorists.
You should not have any lefty friends. Get rid of it.
Sydney Carton on January 28, 2009 at 7:46 PM
To the losers that are trying to run the show.
N4646W on January 28, 2009 at 7:47 PM
Chris Matthews is co-POTUS. Really…
Connie on January 28, 2009 at 7:47 PM
Don’t criticize Sarah, Allahpundit, or I will call you a liberal!
/joke
terryannonline on January 28, 2009 at 7:47 PM
Etiquette and manners are by their very nature untruthfulness. Calling a fat woman “fat” is controversial, because it is true and she doesn’t want to hear the truth.
Calling Obama a socialist crook is controversial, because it is true and his O-bots don’t want to hear the truth.
TMK on January 28, 2009 at 7:48 PM
She wouldn’t be any relation to the other nonpartisan unbiased paragon of media excellence O’Donnell, would she? And I don’t mean Chris or Neal.
fiatboomer on January 28, 2009 at 7:48 PM
Woahza! Calm down!
terryannonline on January 28, 2009 at 7:48 PM
Hey Norah O’Donnell…………….
………….. why aren’t you?
If you and little Miss Chrissy didn’t have Rush to talk about since President Bush is off the radar…………
…….. you would have even less viewers than you do now.
In fact, if Allah didn’t post these threads, you wouldn’t exist in my Universe…..
….. so maybe you should say, “Thanks for helping me keep my job Rush!”
Seven Percent Solution on January 28, 2009 at 7:50 PM
Oh, for f**k’s sake. One of these. Usually it’s mostly the nutty lefties who let their politics interfere with their ability to associate with others.
MadisonConservative on January 28, 2009 at 7:50 PM
I will not calm down. The left has denounced conservatives as evil for decades. It’s time the truth was told: an ideology that supports abortion is evil. An ideology that views your property as the province of the state is evil. An ideology that apologizes for the existence of Western Civilization is evil.
The left is evil. Deal with it.
Sydney Carton on January 28, 2009 at 7:51 PM
And oh by the way, does anyone remember Bill Clinton’s war on Rush Limbaugh? BillJeff personally attacked him throughout his first term and later pretty much insinuated he and talk radio were responsible for Oklahoma City.
Rush has been here before and will handle this appropriately.
fiatboomer on January 28, 2009 at 7:52 PM
It’s quite simple really, Rush is driving the lead tank of the conservative vanguard. And he is firing on all cylinders.
tarpon on January 28, 2009 at 7:53 PM
Better question to Mike Pence: Why are you bothering with MSNBC? If you want to hear Obama’s, Reid’s and Pelosi’s talking points, you can get them directly without the middleman.
Hollowpoint on January 28, 2009 at 7:53 PM
I’m going to go away now since this thread is now officially hijacked. Nice going, Sid.
fiatboomer on January 28, 2009 at 7:53 PM
You have fun shunning 53% of the people you’re going to meet because they’re “evil”.
MadisonConservative on January 28, 2009 at 7:54 PM
Allahpundit lives in NYC. About 98 percent of NYC residents are liberals. (Not an actual figure but I’m probably pretty close.) Do you want AP not to have any friends?
terryannonline on January 28, 2009 at 7:55 PM
Why are Republicans so unwilling to unite behind socialism? Why do they have to so divisively stand up for individual liberty? Why can’t Republicans stop opposing bad ideas on their merits? Why do they complain about every little infringement of their civil liberties?
rplat on January 28, 2009 at 7:55 PM
“Tolerance becomes a crime when applied to EVIL.”
Thomas Mann
technopeasant on January 28, 2009 at 7:56 PM
We already knew you were cozy with liberals, thanks to your posts.
TMK on January 28, 2009 at 7:56 PM
I do. They can burn in hell for all I care.
Meh. Feel free to continue with the topic. Norah O’Donnell is a great example of the left’s evil, though. She’s a bitch who loves to trot out the Republicans are Racist line. Fight fire with fire next time, Mr. Pence.
Sydney Carton on January 28, 2009 at 7:57 PM
YAY, cali Uhaul going wrong way on the highway now.
Bishop on January 28, 2009 at 7:58 PM
I second that motion. Tactics? Weapons? ROE? I’m ready… but like many people, just looking for the right leadership.
drunyan8315 on January 28, 2009 at 7:59 PM
I live in New York City also. I live on the upper west side. I speak with experience. The left IS evil. If they found out I was a conservative, I’d be fired on the spot. If they found out I was anti-abortion, I’d be fired on the spot. Oh yes. The left is plenty evil.
I have no problem associating with a few sane people in Manhattan. I don’t make common cause with people who support baby murder or who want the city to be blown to hell by the terrorists (or who are too stupid to see that their policies would lead to that).
Geography doesn’t dictate my morality.
Sydney Carton on January 28, 2009 at 7:59 PM
BO tells Zucker, Zucker tells Capus, Capus passes it on to his minions. His minions double down on conservatives. That’s how it works.
d1carter on January 28, 2009 at 8:00 PM
He should have laughed and reminded her she’s on the Olbermann Network.
Patrick S on January 28, 2009 at 8:01 PM
Well, I guess this answers the question of who the left will demonize now that Bush is gone…
Rush= the new Bush. Heck, they only need to change one letter on the propaganda.
Damiano on January 28, 2009 at 8:01 PM
For sure AllahPundit, he should have followed your lead and polling data instead. He should have stood on YOUR kind of principals and said, “Screw Rush, and all you conservative voters who voted for me. Pres. Obama and the Democrats won dang it! They deserve our respect and support! I’m going to go along with them all the way down this crap hole because Pres. Obama has something like 70% approval rating and I need to keep my job for Pete’s Sake! Heck Ya’ll, don’t you know that when the economy turns around in two years the MSM will say it’s my fault and piss and moan at me for sticking to fiscally conservative principals??? You should understand that maintaining my job and at least SOME Republicans in Congress by numbers and statistics is more important than us actually DOING ANYTHING conservative either socially OR FISCALLY! Thank you for your time!”
Allah your act is tired…
Sultry Beauty on January 28, 2009 at 8:02 PM
he more they can tar the whole GOP with whatever controversial thing he’ll say tomorrow.
Well, yeah. Or any fake-controversial thing they can pin on him– remember Obama’s Rush/Immigration/Anti-McCain ad?
MayBee on January 28, 2009 at 8:03 PM
Jokes on them Allahpundit. Rush will be gone all next week. The MSM will have to drop it. Reid won’t be able to use Rush as a distraction. Reid will have to bring it up for a vote next week. And Reid does not have it in him. And I think Rush has a sense of leadership on this. IT is subtle but he KNOWS he is affecting policy. Rush has the wind at his back and an unparalleled amount of grassroots support.
I think the tide is finally shifting in the GOP the Republicans seem to losing strength and the grassroots seem to be getting stronger.
Theworldisnotenough on January 28, 2009 at 8:04 PM
wrong. the only person who trumps RUSH in the conservative pantheon..is REAGAN
right4life on January 28, 2009 at 8:06 PM
DEAD ON!
Sultry Beauty on January 28, 2009 at 8:09 PM
I heard Gingrey apologize on Limbaugh’s show today. It took stones to do that and intelligence. AP, I don’t mind you stirring the pot but have a little class.
Vince on January 28, 2009 at 8:15 PM
Why do Republicans even bother going on these programs? They have to know by now that they are only going to get dumped on. The press is going to make stuff up whether we are there a the time or not so stay home.
johnsteele on January 28, 2009 at 8:15 PM
I’d say making moral judgments based on party affiliation is evil.
Life isn’t simple. So the question is, what are you selling?
TheUnrepentantGeek on January 28, 2009 at 8:17 PM
Entelechy to media – why are you so beholden to Obama?
Entelechy on January 28, 2009 at 8:17 PM
Awwwwww, they caught her.
Bishop on January 28, 2009 at 8:20 PM
F*CK YOU MSNBC!
Teddy on January 28, 2009 at 8:21 PM
Yeah, I wish I could be like you, unable to handle a conversation with people for more than 10 seconds without demanding a listing of their votes for the last several years, and leaving if any of them dare disagree with you politically.
Meanwhile, I’m just a guy who takes a person at their character, not their ballot punching. I’m the guy who recognizes that right-wingers can be douchebags, and left-wingers can be good people. Naturally, that means I’m “cozy with liberals”.
Do some of you even leave your mother’s basement?
MadisonConservative on January 28, 2009 at 8:22 PM
Limbaugh is now a good chunk of MSNBC’s bread and butter. What would they be shouting about, and whom would they name “worst person”, with GWB gone, and with their entire beings in Obama’s crotch?
Entelechy on January 28, 2009 at 8:22 PM
George Soros said he owns the DNC. Why would this be any different, even if it were true?
DL13 on January 28, 2009 at 8:27 PM
Journalism is dead. My gawd, is it dead.
ex-Democrat on January 28, 2009 at 8:29 PM
Rush isn’t the head of the GOP. Never has been. Rush is head of the Conservative movement. No one in the Republican Party for the last 8 years has actually espoused Conservatism. They are beginning to see the error of their ways. Rush is showing them the way. The Dems are going nuts because it is getting more difficult for them to appear reasonable. Every day they show how reactionary they are. None of them have any ideas that are constructive. Socialism fails every time it is tried. It’s failing right before our very eyes. Obama knows it will fail, but he is arrogant enough to think he can pick it up and revive it. Not gonna happen. That’s why the Libs are in full attack mode. Now they are only going to have Obama to blame and they will go nuts before that happens.
BetseyRoss on January 28, 2009 at 8:35 PM
BetseyRoss on January 28, 2009 at 8:35 PM
Nicely stated Betsey!
Keemo on January 28, 2009 at 8:43 PM
I’m proud to have Mike Pence from my state. I was even shocked and amazed that my absent Congressman Dan Burton actually took to the floor to denounce Crap Sandwich.
Hey Nora, little less hackery and more shut the hell up, please.
Dr.Cwac.Cwac on January 28, 2009 at 8:44 PM
Neither of the above – everybody knows George Soros is the head of the DNC.
uncivilized on January 28, 2009 at 8:49 PM
Tru dat, playa. The “dark hand of Soros” filters its dirty money through all of the front groups, 527s, and 501-c-3′s like Media DontMatters, Daily Kooks, MoveOut and the CCCP.
Dr.Cwac.Cwac on January 28, 2009 at 8:53 PM
Ding!
MadisonConservative on January 28, 2009 at 8:55 PM
Dear Brainless Slut,
This is not a statement that invites an intelligent response.
Jaibones on January 28, 2009 at 9:13 PM
Armey being a Dick and Matthews and Norah just being themselves. Douche bags.
roninacreage on January 28, 2009 at 9:21 PM
Rush Limbaugh is the William Buckley of our day. He is carrying the banner of conservatism looking for a politician willing to accept the mantle of Leader. If you keep talking Rush, the leader will emerge.
Mallard T. Drake on January 28, 2009 at 9:30 PM
Rush Limbaugh is the W. Buckley of our day? Huh? Rush has been around for almost twenty years, no?
terryannonline on January 28, 2009 at 9:32 PM
O’Donnell is a twit of the highest caliber. Did you see her adjusting her knee pads for the next White House interview?
wepeople on January 28, 2009 at 9:33 PM
If Republican Congressmen feel such an urgency to accommodate the Democrats, why don’t they just dispense with formalities and switch parties? Then we could elect Republicans who will listen to their base without any shame.
chunderroad on January 28, 2009 at 9:34 PM
“I’m so damn glad that you could never be my wife…” And then it got good… lol
-
-
RalphyBoy on January 28, 2009 at 9:37 PM
Political figures don’t need to criticize Rush; the only reason for pols on the right to do it to ingratiate themselves to the media or left.
And re:Palin – to be frank, your assertion yesterday that we’d all be pro-amnesty if she came out that way is nothing short of an insult to your readers and politically aware conservatives in general.
I am led to think that you believe conservatives, like liberals, triumph personality over principle. That is not true of “conservatives” – though if you believe it’s true, it raises a couple interesting questions about why you think people visit this site.
Spirit of 1776 on January 28, 2009 at 9:44 PM
Rush libaugh is a symbol
But the real reason still is
the liberals control 95% of all the media in this country
and 95%of all the media is almost in bankrupcy court
A. they cannot have any dissent
B. they cannot make progress with 5% of the media (foz, talk radio and the few internet sites)
Making money (it proves that liberalism is not only a mental disorder
its now downright dangerous to our own countries survival..
jcila on January 28, 2009 at 9:45 PM
“How can you take pride in your individualism, and then call yourself a ‘dittohead’?”
One could ask the Democrats how they can take pride in their diversity and then engage in identity politics. Didn’t Dick Army think to make this point?
Turn their “Our differences bring us together” psycho-babble around on them. That’s why you’re on TV. Grow a pair.
chunderroad on January 28, 2009 at 9:46 PM
Sarah Palin was on MSNBC? when?
Noneya on January 28, 2009 at 9:47 PM
Damn, is that Walsh/Armey crosstalk contentious.
Almost makes me uncomfortable just watching it.
This is kinda like Lawrence O’Donnell’s breakdown on Scarborough.
KingGold on January 28, 2009 at 9:47 PM
The problem is that some people actually afford some degree of credibility to”C” average journalist majors like nutty Norah.
rplat on January 28, 2009 at 9:47 PM
Guess who I will be listening to @ noon tomorrow! Rush does keep msnbc floating!!! LOL
allrsn on January 28, 2009 at 9:54 PM
Chris Matthews almost got Joan Walsh to make a point instead of repeat “social justice” which is income redistribution. If you work and don’t pay taxes, but your payroll taxes pay into Social Security and Medicaid (socialist Democrat programs)… then you collect from programs you never paid into, but other people did, that is WELFARE, not social justice. If you make as much as a school teacher, social worker or a nurse while you flip burgers, that is not social justice. It certainly is not good for the economy, because productivity slows down if the incentive to work is absent.
Come on, Dick Army. Does he have the same problem as John McCain? Apparently, they think their job is to speak for the party by winking instead of explaining policy.
chunderroad on January 28, 2009 at 10:02 PM
Well,the Liberals want you to believe, there
nicy nice to Republicans, and they’re workin
real hard,after all,she says that America is
trying to come together!
What a load of moose poo!
So,it seems that this is ‘talkin points’on every
liberal show,
its clear,this is a agenda of the Liberal Party,
by political design!
The next Liberal stage will be the their ‘Fairness
Doctrine’!
canopfor on January 28, 2009 at 10:05 PM
And the winking thing was a Sarah Palin reference. But how come she’s the dumb one when she was the only one who could articulate our positions and make people listen. John McCain felt it should be obvious that Ayers’ actions in the past were despicable, and his failure to apologize made him a poor associate for a presidential candidate. Sarah Palin called Ayers and his wife a terrorist. Most Americans still think she was talking about Bin Laden or something, because McCain thought it went without saying.
chunderroad on January 28, 2009 at 10:07 PM
Sorry, but Palin is not my de facto leader. My first thought was the same as right4life’s, REAGAN. Then, Coulter, then Steyn. Sarah doesn’t make my list, unfortuneatly, as I’m looking for a politician to lead us not just our wonderful pundits.
-Aslan’s Girl
Aslans Girl on January 28, 2009 at 10:08 PM
Thanks for the link AP!
…and, I forget to thank you and Ed enough (AND THE BOSS!) for this website.
So…thanks to you all, and keep up the good work!
Saltysam on January 28, 2009 at 10:09 PM
Sarah Palin
Noneya on Jan 28,2009 at 9:47PM.
Noneya: You need to bottle up that HATE for the JIHADYS!
canopfor on January 28, 2009 at 10:12 PM
Rush has predicted that since Bush is gone, he will become the scapegoat for the media.
He’s right, again!
ToddonCapeCod on January 28, 2009 at 10:13 PM
Excellent responses from Rep. Mike Pence from Indiana. When a charge is brought of up racism (and I really wish Rush hadn’t said that, because it’s obvious how Obama got to be President) or the Republicans are accused of listening to Rush too much and being obstructionists, the immediate response should be to argue the merits of the stimulus. Rush is actually doing Republicans a favor by drawing attention to it and opening up a healthy debate.
chunderroad on January 28, 2009 at 10:17 PM
]
Let’s take this as having truth to it. If it does, then it shows how unbelievably desperate the Dems are to “tarnish” their opponents who are in the minority.
I hate to burst Allahpundit’s bubble, but I would say that his synopsis as about as false as it could get.
MSNBC is going on a false premise: That Limbaugh is the “head” of the GOP. The reason that Obama is attacking Rush is to tar the rest of the GOP, because they know damn well that their premise is false.
If Rush is wrong, then why do they want to shut him up? Why is he a threat to them? Why don’t they just let Rush be wrong and let him fall on his face? That would do more to harm to Rush’s reputation than this embarrassing manner in which they are giving Rush openings to point out every single flaw they have in their ‘stimulus’ Crap Sandwich.
They know damned well that they can’t “tarnish the whole GOP,” with what a radio talk show host says. The reason they are doing this is to shut up Rush Limbaugh. And if they can get Rush a bad enough, “reputation” on the airwaves of MSNBC then they can make a case that he is so, “offensive” that it warrants the government ignoring the first amendment right of free speech.
That’s what they are about with this, and it will become more obvious as time goes on.
JannyMae on January 28, 2009 at 10:18 PM
Ironic to hear Chrissy talking about “alters”. Being he never wanders far from his in front of the big “O”.
Hog Wild on January 28, 2009 at 10:20 PM
You might disagree that Sarah Palin is a Reagan conservative, and you may think being a governor and vice presidential nominee are insignificant leadership experience, but that’s why Sarah Palin is both of those things and calls herself a woman instead of a girl.
chunderroad on January 28, 2009 at 10:23 PM
JannyMae on January 28, 2009 at 10:18 PM
You may not be too far off.
But the Left is overreaching (already). This will backfire in their face, and they won’t even know what happened.
Saltysam on January 28, 2009 at 10:27 PM
BobAnthony to Norah O’Donnell–SHUT UP HAMMERHEAD!
BobAnthony on January 28, 2009 at 10:27 PM
Comment pages: 1 2 Next »