<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Did Obama allow exception for &#8220;temporary&#8221; CIA black sites?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://hotair.com/archives/2009/01/28/did-obama-allow-exception-for-temporary-cia-black-sites/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/01/28/did-obama-allow-exception-for-temporary-cia-black-sites/</link>
	<description>The world’s first, full-service conservative Internet broadcast network</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 29 May 2012 15:05:28 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Did Obama allow exception for âtemporaryâ CIA black sites? &#171; Top Daily Digest Reading</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/01/28/did-obama-allow-exception-for-temporary-cia-black-sites/comment-page-1/#comment-1931756</link>
		<dc:creator>Did Obama allow exception for âtemporaryâ CIA black sites? &#171; Top Daily Digest Reading</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Mar 2009 12:25:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=42090#comment-1931756</guid>
		<description>[...] Interesting? Proceed here. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Interesting? Proceed here. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Telling it straight: Must reads &#124; The Anchoress</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/01/28/did-obama-allow-exception-for-temporary-cia-black-sites/comment-page-1/#comment-1829719</link>
		<dc:creator>Telling it straight: Must reads &#124; The Anchoress</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Jan 2009 19:23:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=42090#comment-1829719</guid>
		<description>[...] Obama allow &#8220;exemption&#8221; to CIA Black ops sites? More [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Obama allow &#8220;exemption&#8221; to CIA Black ops sites? More [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steynian 318</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/01/28/did-obama-allow-exception-for-temporary-cia-black-sites/comment-page-1/#comment-1827300</link>
		<dc:creator>Steynian 318</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Jan 2009 00:14:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=42090#comment-1827300</guid>
		<description>[...] CAKE &amp; EAT IT, TOO&#8211; &#8220;Did Obama allow exception for “temporary” CIA black sites?&#8221; &#8230;. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] CAKE &amp; EAT IT, TOO&#8211; &#8220;Did Obama allow exception for “temporary” CIA black sites?&#8221; &#8230;. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steynian 318 &#171; Free Canuckistan!</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/01/28/did-obama-allow-exception-for-temporary-cia-black-sites/comment-page-1/#comment-1826877</link>
		<dc:creator>Steynian 318 &#171; Free Canuckistan!</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Jan 2009 22:38:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=42090#comment-1826877</guid>
		<description>[...] CAKE &amp; EAT IT, TOO&#8211; &#8220;Did Obama allow exception for “temporary” CIA black sites?&#8221; &#8230;. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] CAKE &amp; EAT IT, TOO&#8211; &#8220;Did Obama allow exception for “temporary” CIA black sites?&#8221; &#8230;. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: smellthecoffee</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/01/28/did-obama-allow-exception-for-temporary-cia-black-sites/comment-page-1/#comment-1823890</link>
		<dc:creator>smellthecoffee</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Jan 2009 01:58:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=42090#comment-1823890</guid>
		<description>He woke up in the morning, and forgetting about his Ex-Order, he thought the &quot;black sites&quot; were a minority set-aside program, so of course he asked for a temporary extension.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>He woke up in the morning, and forgetting about his Ex-Order, he thought the &#8220;black sites&#8221; were a minority set-aside program, so of course he asked for a temporary extension.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tom</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/01/28/did-obama-allow-exception-for-temporary-cia-black-sites/comment-page-1/#comment-1823549</link>
		<dc:creator>tom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Jan 2009 00:39:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=42090#comment-1823549</guid>
		<description>Here&#039;s the difference between Bush and Obama on these controversial but necessary options: Bush would publicly defend what he was doing rather than try to hide it, Obama will do the same things that Bush was so criticized for, but sneakily, so you never know exactly what is being done, all the while pretending to be above it.

I&#039;m still laughing at the guy who said the price of gas was coming down, &quot;now that was have an honest man in there.&quot; [the presidency]  These people can&#039;t recognize that Bush was honest, even when you didn&#039;t agree with him, and foolishly believe Obama is.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here&#8217;s the difference between Bush and Obama on these controversial but necessary options: Bush would publicly defend what he was doing rather than try to hide it, Obama will do the same things that Bush was so criticized for, but sneakily, so you never know exactly what is being done, all the while pretending to be above it.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m still laughing at the guy who said the price of gas was coming down, &#8220;now that was have an honest man in there.&#8221; [the presidency]  These people can&#8217;t recognize that Bush was honest, even when you didn&#8217;t agree with him, and foolishly believe Obama is.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brat</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/01/28/did-obama-allow-exception-for-temporary-cia-black-sites/comment-page-1/#comment-1822822</link>
		<dc:creator>Brat</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Jan 2009 22:29:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=42090#comment-1822822</guid>
		<description>There&#039;s that “flinty Chicago toughness” again.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There&#8217;s that “flinty Chicago toughness” again.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: eaglewingz08</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/01/28/did-obama-allow-exception-for-temporary-cia-black-sites/comment-page-1/#comment-1822654</link>
		<dc:creator>eaglewingz08</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Jan 2009 21:50:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=42090#comment-1822654</guid>
		<description>Temporary means until the day before Mr. Obama leaves office. Change we can believe in.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Temporary means until the day before Mr. Obama leaves office. Change we can believe in.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: profitsbeard</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/01/28/did-obama-allow-exception-for-temporary-cia-black-sites/comment-page-1/#comment-1822394</link>
		<dc:creator>profitsbeard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Jan 2009 20:47:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=42090#comment-1822394</guid>
		<description>Obama doesn&#039;t really mean what he says, he utters everything just because he wants power.

Whatever snookers enough suckers is what he will proclaim.

Then he will change course when caught in a lie and try some other form of b.s.

Three-card Monty meet Four-faced Barry.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Obama doesn&#8217;t really mean what he says, he utters everything just because he wants power.</p>
<p>Whatever snookers enough suckers is what he will proclaim.</p>
<p>Then he will change course when caught in a lie and try some other form of b.s.</p>
<p>Three-card Monty meet Four-faced Barry.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Obama’s Rendition Exception. — But As For Me</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/01/28/did-obama-allow-exception-for-temporary-cia-black-sites/comment-page-1/#comment-1822277</link>
		<dc:creator>Obama’s Rendition Exception. — But As For Me</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Jan 2009 20:16:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=42090#comment-1822277</guid>
		<description>[...] not nearly as sanguine about this as Ed was: EXCLUSIVE: Loophole allows terrorist [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] not nearly as sanguine about this as Ed was: EXCLUSIVE: Loophole allows terrorist [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Wyznowski</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/01/28/did-obama-allow-exception-for-temporary-cia-black-sites/comment-page-1/#comment-1822227</link>
		<dc:creator>Wyznowski</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Jan 2009 20:06:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=42090#comment-1822227</guid>
		<description>How long is &quot;permanent&quot; detention anyway?  6 months?  6 years?  Until death by natural causes?  

I bet more terrorist suspects start turning up dead... accidently, of course...or, dead as the result of attempted escapes, naturally.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How long is &#8220;permanent&#8221; detention anyway?  6 months?  6 years?  Until death by natural causes?  </p>
<p>I bet more terrorist suspects start turning up dead&#8230; accidently, of course&#8230;or, dead as the result of attempted escapes, naturally.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ChooseTheHero.com &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Obama’s Rendition Exception.</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/01/28/did-obama-allow-exception-for-temporary-cia-black-sites/comment-page-1/#comment-1822207</link>
		<dc:creator>ChooseTheHero.com &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Obama’s Rendition Exception.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Jan 2009 20:00:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=42090#comment-1822207</guid>
		<description>[...] not nearly as sanguine about this as Ed was: EXCLUSIVE: Loophole allows terrorist [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] not nearly as sanguine about this as Ed was: EXCLUSIVE: Loophole allows terrorist [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Obama&#8217;s Rendition Exception. - Moe_Lane&#8217;s blog - RedState</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/01/28/did-obama-allow-exception-for-temporary-cia-black-sites/comment-page-1/#comment-1822100</link>
		<dc:creator>Obama&#8217;s Rendition Exception. - Moe_Lane&#8217;s blog - RedState</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Jan 2009 19:34:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=42090#comment-1822100</guid>
		<description>[...] not nearly as sanguine about this as Ed was: EXCLUSIVE: Loophole allows terrorist [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] not nearly as sanguine about this as Ed was: EXCLUSIVE: Loophole allows terrorist [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Moe Lane &#187; Obama&#8217;s Rendition Exception.</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/01/28/did-obama-allow-exception-for-temporary-cia-black-sites/comment-page-1/#comment-1821877</link>
		<dc:creator>Moe Lane &#187; Obama&#8217;s Rendition Exception.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Jan 2009 18:53:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=42090#comment-1821877</guid>
		<description>[...] not nearly as sanguine about this as Ed was: EXCLUSIVE: Loophole allows terrorist [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] not nearly as sanguine about this as Ed was: EXCLUSIVE: Loophole allows terrorist [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jaibones</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/01/28/did-obama-allow-exception-for-temporary-cia-black-sites/comment-page-1/#comment-1821849</link>
		<dc:creator>Jaibones</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Jan 2009 18:48:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=42090#comment-1821849</guid>
		<description>One man&#039;s &quot;common sense&quot; is another man&#039;s &quot;my President is a liar and a fool&quot;.

Guess which is whose?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One man&#8217;s &#8220;common sense&#8221; is another man&#8217;s &#8220;my President is a liar and a fool&#8221;.</p>
<p>Guess which is whose?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ex-Democrat</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/01/28/did-obama-allow-exception-for-temporary-cia-black-sites/comment-page-1/#comment-1821820</link>
		<dc:creator>ex-Democrat</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Jan 2009 18:40:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=42090#comment-1821820</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;little-noticed loophole &lt;/blockquote&gt;

What do you mean a &quot;little-noticed loophole ?&quot;

How difficult is it for our vaunted press to read an EO and see this, and then REPORT IT?

Notice this is printed in the Wash &lt;em&gt;Times&lt;/em&gt;, not the seditious comPost.

CHANGE!


Not.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>little-noticed loophole </p></blockquote>
<p>What do you mean a &#8220;little-noticed loophole ?&#8221;</p>
<p>How difficult is it for our vaunted press to read an EO and see this, and then REPORT IT?</p>
<p>Notice this is printed in the Wash <em>Times</em>, not the seditious comPost.</p>
<p>CHANGE!</p>
<p>Not.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jcila</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/01/28/did-obama-allow-exception-for-temporary-cia-black-sites/comment-page-1/#comment-1821762</link>
		<dc:creator>jcila</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Jan 2009 18:27:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=42090#comment-1821762</guid>
		<description>Just like liberals 
they dont have the BALLS to do what is right
So they piggyback on the REAL presidents decisions
all the while denoucing him..

I am waiting for obama to get on his knees
and begin to BEG Abina WakJob forgiveness

Liberals they make me SICK..</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just like liberals<br />
they dont have the BALLS to do what is right<br />
So they piggyback on the REAL presidents decisions<br />
all the while denoucing him..</p>
<p>I am waiting for obama to get on his knees<br />
and begin to BEG Abina WakJob forgiveness</p>
<p>Liberals they make me SICK..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Badger40</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/01/28/did-obama-allow-exception-for-temporary-cia-black-sites/comment-page-1/#comment-1821711</link>
		<dc:creator>Badger40</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Jan 2009 18:14:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=42090#comment-1821711</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;Skywise on January 28, 2009 at 12:30 PM&lt;/blockquote&gt;

So basically, Obama has done NOTHING. He just made it&lt;em&gt; look&lt;/em&gt; like he actually did something.

I have high school students like that in Study Hall. They spend a lot of time &amp; effort making it look like they are actually working, when in reality, they aren&#039;t.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Skywise on January 28, 2009 at 12:30 PM</p></blockquote>
<p>So basically, Obama has done NOTHING. He just made it<em> look</em> like he actually did something.</p>
<p>I have high school students like that in Study Hall. They spend a lot of time &amp; effort making it look like they are actually working, when in reality, they aren&#8217;t.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: LimeyGeek</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/01/28/did-obama-allow-exception-for-temporary-cia-black-sites/comment-page-1/#comment-1821704</link>
		<dc:creator>LimeyGeek</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Jan 2009 18:13:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=42090#comment-1821704</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;Not anymore.

baldilocks on January 28, 2009 at 1:11 PM
&lt;/blockquote&gt;
Not for quite some time.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Not anymore.</p>
<p>baldilocks on January 28, 2009 at 1:11 PM
</p></blockquote>
<p>Not for quite some time.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: baldilocks</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/01/28/did-obama-allow-exception-for-temporary-cia-black-sites/comment-page-1/#comment-1821703</link>
		<dc:creator>baldilocks</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Jan 2009 18:12:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=42090#comment-1821703</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;Chuck Schick on January 28, 2009 at 1:10 PM&lt;/blockquote&gt;Heh.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Chuck Schick on January 28, 2009 at 1:10 PM</p></blockquote>
<p>Heh.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: LimeyGeek</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/01/28/did-obama-allow-exception-for-temporary-cia-black-sites/comment-page-1/#comment-1821699</link>
		<dc:creator>LimeyGeek</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Jan 2009 18:12:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=42090#comment-1821699</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;“African-American sites”, please!

Chuck Schick on January 28, 2009 at 1:10 PM
&lt;/blockquote&gt;
Why are you associating the brutha with prisons? RACIST!

&quot;Photon-deprived sites&quot;, if you please...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>“African-American sites”, please!</p>
<p>Chuck Schick on January 28, 2009 at 1:10 PM
</p></blockquote>
<p>Why are you associating the brutha with prisons? RACIST!</p>
<p>&#8220;Photon-deprived sites&#8221;, if you please&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: baldilocks</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/01/28/did-obama-allow-exception-for-temporary-cia-black-sites/comment-page-1/#comment-1821690</link>
		<dc:creator>baldilocks</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Jan 2009 18:11:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=42090#comment-1821690</guid>
		<description>One thing about this info being in the public domain: I don&#039;t think that we can count on our officials who compose EOs/docs/etc. for the president to endorse knowing which will/won&#039;t help the enemy.  Not anymore.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One thing about this info being in the public domain: I don&#8217;t think that we can count on our officials who compose EOs/docs/etc. for the president to endorse knowing which will/won&#8217;t help the enemy.  Not anymore.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chuck Schick</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/01/28/did-obama-allow-exception-for-temporary-cia-black-sites/comment-page-1/#comment-1821689</link>
		<dc:creator>Chuck Schick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Jan 2009 18:10:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=42090#comment-1821689</guid>
		<description>&quot;African-American sites&quot;, please!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;African-American sites&#8221;, please!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: gwelf</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/01/28/did-obama-allow-exception-for-temporary-cia-black-sites/comment-page-1/#comment-1821683</link>
		<dc:creator>gwelf</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Jan 2009 18:09:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=42090#comment-1821683</guid>
		<description>Change you can believe in! (if you don&#039;t read the fine print)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Change you can believe in! (if you don&#8217;t read the fine print)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Damiano</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/01/28/did-obama-allow-exception-for-temporary-cia-black-sites/comment-page-1/#comment-1821673</link>
		<dc:creator>Damiano</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Jan 2009 18:07:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=42090#comment-1821673</guid>
		<description>Someone please explain this whole fiasco to me. If I am getting this right, Obambi orders Gitmo and all the black sites closed... why?

Gitmo houses accused terrorist await trial. The only thing closing Gitmo accomplishes is to necessitate that we move the same people to a different place, most likely within the US since no one else will have them. We can&#039;t free them, also, because no one will have them (with the exception of the terrorist that we took them from). 

So, Obambi signs an order to close one prison for the purpose of incurring the costs and logistical challenges of building a new prison, transporting all his buddies to their new digs and leaving every conceivable other facet of things intact. How does this make any sense or benefit anyone?

Wouldn&#039;t it have been cheaper and easier to simply rename Gitmo to &quot;Unicorn House&quot; or &quot;Misunderstood Fundamentalist Housing Committee&quot; or something? 

And why would anyone think that signing an executive order that accomplishes nothing other than necessitating executive waivers and exceptions is progress of any sort?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Someone please explain this whole fiasco to me. If I am getting this right, Obambi orders Gitmo and all the black sites closed&#8230; why?</p>
<p>Gitmo houses accused terrorist await trial. The only thing closing Gitmo accomplishes is to necessitate that we move the same people to a different place, most likely within the US since no one else will have them. We can&#8217;t free them, also, because no one will have them (with the exception of the terrorist that we took them from). </p>
<p>So, Obambi signs an order to close one prison for the purpose of incurring the costs and logistical challenges of building a new prison, transporting all his buddies to their new digs and leaving every conceivable other facet of things intact. How does this make any sense or benefit anyone?</p>
<p>Wouldn&#8217;t it have been cheaper and easier to simply rename Gitmo to &#8220;Unicorn House&#8221; or &#8220;Misunderstood Fundamentalist Housing Committee&#8221; or something? </p>
<p>And why would anyone think that signing an executive order that accomplishes nothing other than necessitating executive waivers and exceptions is progress of any sort?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
